Treatment of non-dipper hypertension with bedtime administration of valsartan

BACKGROUND: Previous results have indicated that valsartan administration at bedtime, as opposed to upon wakening, may improve the diurnal: nocturnal ratio of blood pressure without loss in 24-h coverage and efficacy. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the administration time-dependent antihypertensive efficacy of valsartan in non-dipper patients. METHODS: We studied 148 non-dipper patients with grade 1-2 essential hypertension, aged 53.0+/-12.6 years, who were randomly assigned to receive valsartan (160 mg/day) as a monotherapy either on awakening or at bedtime. Blood pressure was measured every 20 min during the day and every 30 min at night for 48 consecutive hours before and after 3 months of treatment. Physical activity was simultaneously monitored every minute by wrist actigraphy to accurately calculate the diurnal and nocturnal means of blood pressure on a per subject basis. RESULTS: The significant blood pressure reduction after 3 months of valsartan (P<0.001) was similar for both treatment times (13.1 and 8.5 mmHg reduction in the 24-h mean of systolic and diastolic blood pressure with morning administration; 14.7 and 10.3 mmHg with bedtime administration; P>0.126 for treatment-time effect). The diurnal: nocturnal ratio of blood pressure was significantly increased only when valsartan was administered before bedtime, which resulted in 75% of the patients in this group reverting to dippers, a significant increase in the percentage of patients with controlled blood pressure over 24 h, and a reduction in urinary albumin excretion. CONCLUSIONS: In non-dipper hypertensive patients, dosing time with valsartan should be chosen at bedtime, for improved efficacy during the nocturnal resting hours, as well as the potential associated reduction in cardiovascular risk.     

Administration time-dependent effects of valsartan on ambulatory blood pressure in hypertensive subjects

This study investigated the administration time-dependent antihypertensive efficacy of valsartan, an angiotensin II receptor blocker. We studied 90 subjects (30 men and 60 women), 49.0+/-14.3 (mean+/-SD) years of age with stage 1 to 2 essential hypertension; they were randomly assigned to receive valsartan (160 mg/d) as a monotherapy either on awakening or at bedtime. Blood pressure was measured by ambulatory monitoring every 20 minutes during the day and every 30 minutes at night for 48 consecutive hours before and after 3 months of treatment. Physical activity was simultaneously monitored every minute by wrist actigraphy to accurately calculate the diurnal and nocturnal means of blood pressure on a per-subject basis. The highly significant blood pressure reduction after 3 months of treatment with valsartan (P<0.001) was similar for both treatment times (17.0 and 11.3 mm Hg reduction in the 24-hour mean of systolic and diastolic blood pressure with morning administration and 14.6 and 11.4 mm Hg reduction with bedtime administration; P>0.174 for treatment time effect). Valsartan administration at bedtime as opposed to on wakening resulted in a highly significant average increase by 6% (P<0.001) in the diurnal-nocturnal ratio of blood pressure; this corresponded to a 73% relative reduction in the number of nondipper patients. The findings confirm that valsartan efficiently reduces blood pressure throughout the entire 24 hours, independent of treatment time. They also suggest that time of treatment can be chosen according to the dipper status of a patient to optimize the effect of antihypertensive therapy, an issue that deserves further investigation.     

Comparison of the efficacy of morning versus evening administration of telmisartan in essential hypertension

Valsartan administration at bedtime as opposed to on wakening improves the sleep time-relative blood pressure decline toward a more dipper pattern without loss in 24-hour efficacy. Yet to be determined is whether this administration time-dependent efficacy is a class-related feature, characteristic of all angiotensin receptor blockers or specific only to valsartan. Terminal half-life is a major difference between angiotensin receptor blockers, being largest ( approximately 24 hours) for telmisartan. This trial investigated the administration time-dependent antihypertensive efficacy of telmisartan. We studied 215 patients with hypertension (114 men and 101 women), 46.4+/-12.0 years of age, randomly assigned to receive telmisartan (80 mg/d) as a monotherapy either on awakening or at bedtime. Blood pressure was measured for 48 hours before and after 12 weeks of treatment. The significant blood pressure reduction after treatment was similar for both groups. Bedtime administration of telmisartan, however, was more efficient than morning dosing in reducing the nocturnal blood pressure mean. The sleep time-relative blood pressure decline was slightly reduced after telmisartan on awakening but significantly increased with bedtime dosing, thus reducing the prevalence of nondipping from baseline by 76%. Telmisartan administered at bedtime, as opposed to morning dosing, improved the sleep time-relative blood pressure decline toward a more dipper pattern without loss in 24-hour efficacy. Nocturnal BP regulation is significantly better achieved with bedtime dosing of telmisartan. Results from this prospective trial suggest that these beneficial features of bedtime dosing may be class related for angiotensin receptor blockers. These results should be taken into account when prescribing this class of antihypertensive medication for treatment of essential hypertension.     

Effects of time of day of treatment on ambulatory blood pressure pattern of patients with resistant hypertension

Patients with resistant hypertension present high prevalence of a non-dipper blood pressure pattern. Recent results indicate that non-dipping is related partly to the absence of 24-hour therapeutic coverage in patients treated with single morning doses. Accordingly, we investigated the impact of treatment time on the blood pressure pattern in 700 patients with resistant hypertension on the basis of clinic measurements who were studied by 48-hour ambulatory monitoring. Among them, 299 patients received all their medication on awakening, and 401 were taking > or =1 antihypertensive drug at bedtime. The percentage of patients with controlled ambulatory blood pressure was double in patients taking 1 drug at bedtime (P=0.008). Among the 578 patients with true resistant hypertension, subjects receiving 1 drug at bedtime showed a significant reduction in the 24-hour mean of systolic and diastolic blood pressure (3.1 and 1.6 mm Hg, respectively; P<0.011). This reduction was much more prominent during nighttime (5.1 and 3.0 mm Hg; P<0.001). Accordingly, the diurnal/nocturnal blood pressure ratio was significantly increased by 2.7 and the prevalence on non-dipping reduced (56.9 versus 81.9%; P<0.001) in patients taking 1 drug at bedtime. Compared with patients receiving all drugs on awakening, subjects with 1 drug at bedtime also showed significant reductions in the average values of glucose, cholesterol, fibrinogen, and urinary albumin excretion (P<0.011). In patients with resistant hypertension, pharmacological therapy should take into account when to treat with respect to the rest-activity cycle of each patient to improve control and to avoid the non-dipper pattern associated to higher cardiovascular risk.     

An alpha-adrenergic blocker titrated by self-measured blood pressure recordings lowered blood pressure and microalbuminuria in patients with morning hypertension: the Japan Morning Surge-1 Study

BACKGROUND: The impact on microalbuminuria of strict treatment aimed at lowering of self-measured morning blood pressure using an adrenergic blockade is unclear. METHODS: We conducted an open-label multicenter trial, the Japan Morning Surge-1 Study, that enrolled 611 hypertensive patients, whose self-measured morning systolic blood pressure levels were more than 135 mmHg while taking antihypertensive drugs. These were randomly allocated to an experimental group, whose members received bedtime administration of 1-4 mg doxazosin (doxazosin group) or a control group whose members continued without any add-on medication (control group). The urinary albumin/creatinine ratio was investigated at the baseline and 6 months after the randomization. RESULTS: Both the morning and evening blood pressures and urinary albumin/creatinine ratio (-3.4 vs. 0.0 mg/gCr for urinary albumin/creatinine ratio; P < 0.001) were more markedly reduced in the doxazosin group than in the control group. This difference in the urinary albumin/creatinine ratio between the two groups was more marked in the patients with microalbuminuria (n = 238, -27.9 vs. -8.1 mg/gCr, P < 0.001). The reduction of urinary albumin/creatinine ratio was significantly associated with the use of doxazosin, and the change in all self-measured blood pressures (morning, evening, the average morning-evening), and these associations were independent of each other (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Adding a bedtime dose of an alpha-adrenergic blocker titrated by self-measured morning blood pressure in treated hypertensive patients with uncontrolled morning hypertension significantly reduced blood pressure and urinary albumin excretion rate, particularly in those with microalbuminuria.     

Differing administration time-dependent effects of aspirin on blood pressure in dipper and non-dipper hypertensives

Aspirin is a potent antioxidative agent that reduces vascular production of superoxide, prevents angiotensin II-induced hypertension, and induces NO release. Low-dose aspirin administered at bedtime, but not on awakening, has also been shown to reduce blood pressure, possibly enhancing the nocturnal trough in NO production. Because endothelium-dependent vasodilation is blunted through a decrease in NO release in non-dipper compared with dipper patients, we compared the administration time-dependent influence of aspirin on ambulatory blood pressure in dipper and non-dipper hypertensive subjects. We studied 257 patients with mild hypertension (98 men and 159 women), 44.6+/-12.5 years of age, randomly assigned to receive 100 mg per day of aspirin either on awakening or at bedtime. Ambulatory blood pressure was measured for 48 hours at baseline and after 3 months of intervention. Blood pressure was slightly elevated after aspirin on awakening (increase of 1.5/1.0 mm Hg in the 24-hour mean of systolic/diastolic blood pressure; P<0.028). A highly significant blood pressure reduction was observed in patients who received aspirin at bedtime (decrease of 7.2/4.9 mm Hg in systolic/diastolic blood pressure; P<0.001). The reduction in nocturnal blood pressure mean was double in non-dippers (11.0/7.1 mm Hg) compared with dippers (5.5/3.3 mm Hg; P<0.001). This prospective trial corroborates the significant administration time-dependent effect of low-dose aspirin on blood pressure, mainly in non-dipper hypertensive patients. The timed administration of low-dose aspirin could thus provide a valuable approach, beyond prevention of cardiovascular disease, in the blood pressure control of patients with mild hypertension.     

Effects of telmisartan 80 mg and valsartan 160 mg on ambulatory blood pressure in patients with essential hypertension

OBJECTIVES: This trial investigated and compared the antihypertensive efficacy of telmisartan and valsartan, two angiotensin II receptor blockers, used in monotherapy at their maximum recommended dose in hypertensive patients. METHODS: We studied 70 subjects (32 men and 38 women) aged 47.6 +/- 12.2 (mean +/- SD) years, with mild to moderate essential hypertension; they were randomly assigned to receive monotherapy with either telmisartan (80 mg) or valsartan (160 mg), in the form of a single daily tablet upon awakening. Blood pressure was measured by ambulatory monitoring every 20 min during the day and every 30 min at night for 48 consecutive hours before and after 3 months of treatment. Physical activity was simultaneously monitored every minute by wrist actigraphy to calculate accurately the diurnal and nocturnal means of blood pressure on a per subject basis. RESULTS: There was a highly significant blood pressure reduction during the 24 h with both drugs. The blood pressure reduction in the 24-h mean was significantly larger for valsartan 160 mg (18.6 and 12.1 mmHg for systolic and diastolic blood pressure, respectively) than for telmisartan 80 mg (10.8 and 8.4 mmHg; P < 0.001 between treatment-groups). There was also a highly significant reduction (P < 0.001) of 6.5 mmHg in the 24-h mean of pulse pressure after valsartan administration only. The trough : peak ratio and the smoothness index were slightly higher in systolic, but similar in diastolic blood pressure, for telmisartan as compared to valsartan. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a shorter half-life, 160 mg/day valsartan was more effective in lowering blood pressure over 24 h than 80 mg/day telmisartan. Furthermore, valsartan was also more effective in lowering arterial pulse pressure, an observation that may have important therapeutic implications, given the mounting evidence that pulse pressure may be a risk factor for future cardiovascular events.     

Diurnal blood pressure pattern may predict the increase of urinary albumin excretion in normotensive normoalbuminuric type 1 diabetes mellitus patients

To characterise the relationship between diurnal blood pressure and the subsequent increase of urinary albumin excretion (UAE) in normotensive normoalbuminuric type 1 diabetic patients, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) was performed in 53 patients, who were then followed for 5 years. Albumin excretion rate changed from 12.4 (8.9-17.2) to 29.3 (15.2-47.0) mg/day. Macroalbuminuria developed in 2 (3.8%), microalbuminuria in 22 (41.5%) patients, 29 (54.7%) remained normoalbuminuric. Night-time diastolic blood pressure was significantly higher (64.3+/-6.5 vs. 60.9+/-5.5 mmHg, P<0.05), diastolic diurnal index significantly lower (15.5+/-9.7 vs. 22.3+/-6.2%, P<0.01) in patients who later progressed to micro- or macroalbuminuria. Diastolic diurnal index (r=-0.40; P<0.01) and nocturnal diastolic pressure (r=0.35; P<0.01) were correlated to the change in albumin excretion. In a multivariate analysis model with the change of albumin excretion as dependent, and means and diurnal indices of systolic and diastolic blood pressure, baseline UAE, cholesterol, triglycerides, HbA1c and retinopathy as independent parameters (r=0.68; P=0.001), diurnal index for diastolic blood pressure (beta=-0.30; r=0.013), baseline HbA1c (beta=0.32; P=0.010) and retinopathy (beta=0.44; P=0.001) were significant independent correlates. We conclude that the relative increase of nocturnal blood pressure is associated with the subsequent increase of albuminuria, which in turn is predictive of overt diabetic nephropathy.     

Evaluation of dosing time-related anti-hypertensive efficacy of valsartan in patients with type 2 diabetes

The aim of this study was to evaluate which administration timing of valsartan provides satisfactory blood pressure (BP) control, once daily in the morning, once daily in the evening, or twice daily in total 160 mg. Hypertensive patients with mild-to-moderate diabetic nephropathy were enrolled, but those with more than three anti-hypertensive agents, renal insufficiency (serum creatinine ≥ 3 mg/ dL), or hepatic insufficiency were excluded. They were randomized to receive valsartan 160mg once daily in the morning, valsartan 160 mg once daily in the evening, or valsartan 80 mg twice daily for 12 weeks according to a three-period crossover design. Office blood pressure (OBP), home blood pressure (HBP) self-measured by patients, and urinary albumin excretion adjusted by creatinine excretion (UAE) were measured every 12 weeks. In 34 patients, (male: 18, mean age: 57.5 ± 10.3), valsartan with ether all administration timing demonstrated significant reductions in OBP and HBP compared to baseline: valsartan 160 mg once daily in the morning: -12.2/-9.5 mmHg (p < 0.01); valsartan 160 mg once daily in the evening: -14.2/-10.3 mmHg (p < 0.01); valsartan 80 mg twice daily: -15.0/-10.2 mmHg (p < 0.01) There was no statistically significant differences in a decrease in OBP and HBP, and reduction of UAE among three administration timing. In conclusion, these data indicate that the efficacy on BP-lowering does not depend on administration timing of valsartan in patients with diabetic nephropathy.     

Chronotherapy improves blood pressure control and reverts the nondipper pattern in patients with resistant hypertension

Therapeutic strategies in resistant hypertension include adding another drug or changing drugs in search for a better synergic combination. Most patients, however, receive all of their drugs in a single morning dose. We have evaluated the impact on the circadian pattern of blood pressure on modifying the time of treatment without increasing the number of prescribed drugs. We studied 250 hypertensive patients who were receiving 3 antihypertensive drugs in a single morning dose. Patients were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups according to the modification in their treatment strategy: changing 1 of the drugs but keeping all 3 in the morning or the same approach but administering the new drug at bedtime. Blood pressure was measured for 48 hours before and after 12 weeks of treatment. There was no effect on ambulatory blood pressure when all of the drugs were taken on awakening. The baseline prevalence of nondipping (79%) was slightly increased after treatment (86%; P=0.131). The ambulatory blood pressure reduction was statistically significant (9.4/6.0 mm Hg for systolic/diastolic blood pressure; P<0.001) with 1 drug at bedtime. This reduction was larger in the nocturnal than in the diurnal mean of blood pressure. Thus, whereas only 16% of the patients in this group were dippers at baseline, 57% were dippers after therapy (P<0.001). Results indicate that, in resistant hypertension, time of treatment may be more important for blood pressure control and for the proper modeling of the circadian blood pressure pattern than just changing the drug combination.     

24-Hour and Nighttime Blood Pressures in Type 2 Diabetic Hypertensive Patients Following Morning or Evening Administration of Olmesartan

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) allows determining of the nocturnal blood pressure fall (NBPF). An NBPF below 10% (nondipper pattern) has been related to increased cardiovascular risk, and it is a common finding in type 2 diabetic hypertensive patients. The authors evaluated the impact on 24-hour blood pressure, NBPF, and albuminuria of olmesartan 40 mg, administered in a morning- vs a nocturnal-based dosing scheme, in type 2 diabetic patients with newly diagnosed hypertension. Using a crossover design, 40 patients (42.1% men) received olmesartan 40 mg once daily at wake up or bedtime for 8 weeks. Patients underwent 24-hour ABPM at baseline and at weeks 8 and 16, and albumin to creatinine ratio was measured at baseline and 8 weeks. Night systolic blood pressure (BP) ( P =.007) and mean BP ( P =.012) were significantly reduced following the bedtime dose, compared with morning dosing. Night BP fall (%) was significantly reduced by bedtime dosing, compared with morning dosing ( P =.0001). No differences were seen for urinary albumin excretion between both arms at week 8. Without affecting 24-hour BP control, night dosing of olmesartan increases nocturnal BP fall significantly more than conventional morning dosing, increasing the number of dipper diabetic hypertensive patients.     

缬沙坦治疗高血压合并糖调节受损患者早期肾损害的短期临床疗效

目的 探讨原发性高血压合并糖调节受损（IGR）患者早期肾损害的情况与缬沙坦的短期干预效果.方法 顺序纳入275例高血压合并IGR的患者测定尿微量蛋白,对高血压合并IGR早期肾损害患者,使用缬沙坦80 mg/d治疗8周,治疗前后分别测定尿微量蛋白[尿白蛋白（Alb）、微量白蛋白尿排泄率（UAER）].结果 共筛查275例高血压合并IGR患者,有189例存在早期肾损害（68.73％）,男女患病率分别为25.45％、43.27％,女性较男性高（x2=9.573,P=0.00）.高血压合并IGR伴早期肾损害189例患者在缬沙坦治疗8周后收缩压、舒张压及脉压均有明显下降（均为P＜0.05）;虽然空腹血糖无明显变化,但可以显著降低餐后2h血糖水平（P＜0.01）,微量白蛋白尿也显著降低.结论 高血压合并IGR的患者存在早期肾损害者较多.缬沙坦在控制血压的同时,具有改善糖代谢异常,降低微量蛋白尿的作用.     

Weighted Fourier analysis of blood pressure curves after lisinopril versus atenolol administration in young hypertensives

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare the effects of lisinopril versus atenolol administration on the diurnal blood pressure profile and the nocturnal blood pressure fall in young mild-to-moderate essential hypertensives.METHODS: Thirty patients were studied. After a 2-week placebo run-in period, they were single-blind randomly assigned to receive 20 mg lisinopril or 100 mg atenolol. Using a SpaceLabs 90207 device, their ambulatory blood pressure was measured before and after 12 weeks of therapy. The readings were analysed using Fourer series with four harmonics. RESULTS: Lisinopril and atenolol administration significantly decreased office and ambulatory blood pressure values compared with the placebo period. The daily blood pressure curves obtained from Fourier analysis showed that the circadian rhythm was not altered by lisinopril and atenolol administration. From the night:day ratio for the nocturnal blood pressure fall, we found that atenolol administration minimized the average night-time blood pressure dip by increasing the number of non-dippers. In contrast, lisinopril administration did not modify the day-night difference, preserving the nocturnal blood pressure fall. CONCLUSION: Lisinopril and atenolol administration as a first-step treatment of young essential hypertensives produced comparable degrees of diurnal control of arterial pressure. The blood pressure fall at night in patients treated with atenolol was slightly less than that found with lisinopril treatment.     

Diurnal Variation in Blood Pressure in Insulin-dependent Diabetic Smokers and Non-smokers with and without Microalbuminuria

In subjects with essential hypertension, loss of the normal nocturnal dip in blood pressure is associated with a greater risk of developing end-organ complications. In subjects with diabetes, smoking carries a similar association. To assess whether these factors may have an aetiological and synergistic role in the vascular complications of diabetes, 24-hour blood pressure monitoring was performed in insulin-dependent diabetic (IDDM) patients with normal albumin excretion (n = 19) and microalbuminuria (n = 21) of comparable age and duration of diabetes, and with no evidence of autonomic neuropathy or hypertension. The potential influence of smoking was examined by subdividing the groups, depending on smoking status. Ten of the microalbuminuric group and 9 of the normoalbuminuric group were current smokers, the remaining patients never having smoked. There was a significant difference between mean (±SD) daytime vs nocturnal blood pressure in patients with normal albumin excretion (114 ± 3/70 ± 4 vs 102 ± 3/62 ± 3 mmHg; p < 0.001) and microalbuminuria (109 ± 5/75 ± 5 vs 101 ± 3/65 ± 4 mmHg; p < 0.001) but mean blood pressure values did not differ significantly between the groups. A similar fall in nocturnal blood pressure was found in smokers and non-smokers with and without microalbuminuria (p < 0.001), but there was no difference between the mean blood pressure values in the different subgroups. In conclusion, normotensive IDDM patients, who do not have autonomic neuropathy, retain a significant diurnal variation in blood pressure, irrespective of smoking habit or presence of microalbuminuria. © 1997 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

吲哒帕胺联合氯沙坦对老年高血压病人血尿酸及β2-微球蛋白的影响

目的 探讨氯沙坦联合吲哒帕胺对老年高血压患者的血压、血尿酸（UA）及血、尿β2-微球蛋白（β2-MG）的影响。方法 50例老年高血压患者随机分成两组，对照组（吲哒帕胺组）24例，观察组（氯沙坦加吲哒帕胺组）26例，观察12w，比较治疗前后患者血压、血钾、血UA及血、尿β2-MG等指标的变化。结果 治疗后两组收缩压及舒张压均较治疗前明显下降（P〈0．01），两组比较无差异（P〉0．05）；对照组治疗前后比较，血UA浓度明显升高（P〈0．01），血、尿β2-MG浓度无明显变化，血钾明显降低（P〈0．05），观察组治疗前后血UA及血、尿β2-MG均明显下降（P〈0．01）。结论 吲哒帕胺和氯沙坦联合治疗老年高血压病，较单独用药更有效地控制血压，降低血UA及减少低血钾的发生，保护靶器官，具有良好的安全性和耐受性。     

Comparison of morning vs bedtime administration of the combination of valsartan/amlodipine on nocturnal brachial and central blood pressure in patients with hypertension

The aim of this study was to compare the effect of morning and bedtime administration of valsartan/amlodipine combination therapy (80/5 mg) on nocturnal brachial and central blood pressure (BP) measured by ambulatory BP monitoring in patients with hypertension. This was a 16‐week prospective, multicenter, randomized, open‐label, crossover, noninferiority clinical trial. Patients underwent 24‐hour ambulatory BP monitoring at randomization, at switching, and at the end of the study. Twenty‐three patients (mean age, 68.0 years) were studied. The difference in nocturnal brachial systolic BP between the morning and bedtime administrations of combination valsartan/amlodipine was −3.2 mm Hg, and the two‐sided 95% confidence interval ranged from −6.8 to 0.4 mm Hg. The difference in nocturnal central systolic BP was −4.0 mm Hg (95% confidence interval, −7.6 to −0.4 mm Hg). The upper limit of the 95% confidence interval was below the margin of 3.0 mm Hg in both nocturnal brachial and central systolic BP, confirming the noninferiority of morning administration to the bedtime administration of valsartan/amlodipine combination therapy.     

Renoprotective effects of low-dose valsartan in type 2 diabetic patients with diabetic nephropathy

It is unknown whether the angiotensin receptor antagonist valsartan exerts a renoprotective effect on patients with type 2 diabetes and diabetic nephropathy independent of its hypotensive effects. Forty patients with type 2 diabetes participated in this study. All patients received valsartan 40 mg, a dose with no clinical effect on blood pressure levels. Blood pressure, urinary albumin excretion (UAE), and creatinine clearance were determined at baseline and at the end of the 6-month treatment period. Antihypertensive and/or antidiabetic drugs, including insulin, were permitted throughout the study. After 6 months of valsartan therapy, mean UAE decreased from 86.8 +/- 196 to 46.9 +/- 97 microg/min (n = 37). In addition, a significant decrease was observed in the UAE of the subgroup of patients displaying diabetic nephropathy (UAE > 20 microg/min, n = 14), from 219.4 +/- 275 to 102.7 +/- 141 microg/min, (P < 0.01). Changes in UAE for valsartan correlated significantly with UAE at baseline (r = -0.935, P < 0.0001). Serum creatinine levels and creatinine clearance remained stable before and after treatment with valsartan. No significant differences were observed between pre- and post-treatment body mass index, glycosylated hemoglobin, or systolic and diastolic blood pressure. In type 2 diabetic patients with diabetic nephropathy, 6 months of treatment with low dose valsartan, an angiotensin-II receptor antagonist, thus reduced UAE with no reduction in systemic blood pressure. The drug may be safely administered in this subset of type 2 diabetic patients. The long-term benefits in terms of risk reduction must still be evaluated in further trials.     

Long-term effects of angiotensin II receptor blockade with valsartan on carotid arterial stiffness and hemodynamic alterations in patients with essential hypertension

Increased arterial stiffness and intima media thickness (IMT) in the common carotid artery (CCA) are related to cardiovascular risk in essential hypertension. Angiotensin II plays an important role in structural and functional changes in the vasculature. In this study, we evaluated the long-term effect of the angiotensin II receptor blocker, valsartan, on IMT, arterial stiffness, and hemodynamics in the CCA in patients with essential hypertension. A prospective 24 month study of treatment with valsartan (80-160 mg/day) was performed in 24 hypertensive patients. An ultrasound of the CCA was carried out to determine IMT, the cross-sectional distensibility coefficient (CSDC), the carotid arterial stiffness index beta, and diastolic flow velocity to systolic flow velocity ratio (Vd/Vs). Treatment with valsartan for 24 months reduced systolic and diastolic blood pressure significantly. Compared to baseline, the decrease in pulse pressure was greater after 24 months treatment than after 12 months treatment. Valsartan did not influence IMT; however, after 24 months, it caused a significant increase in CSDC and a decrease in stiffness index beta compared to baseline. These changes were not observed after 12 months of treatment. In addition, Vd/Vs, a sensitive marker of relative diastolic blood flow, increased after 24 months' treatment with valsartan. These results suggest that long-term treatment with valsartan improves vascular wall function and hemodynamics in patients with essential hypertension.     

The bedtime administration of doxazosin controls morning hypertension and albuminuria in patients with type-2 diabetes: evaluation using home-based blood pressure measurements

The control of high blood pressure (BP) after awakening in the morning (morning hypertension) as determined by home BP (HBP), as well as BP control throughout the day, may prevent diabetic vascular complications. We examined the effect of an alpha-adrenergic blocker (doxazosin) on BP measurements taken by HBP after awakening and during clinic visits (CBP) in 50 patients with type-2 diabetes and morning hypertension. We evaluated the urinary albumin excretion rate as an indicator of nephropathy. Doxazosin was taken orally once at bedtime for 1 to 3 months. The mean (+/- SD) dose was 2.9 +/- 2.1 mg/day (1 to 8 mg/day). The BP was measured monthly at the clinic during the day and at home after awakening in the morning. In this short-term trial (2.8 +/- 0.4 months), the systolic HBP decreased significantly from 164 +/- 17 mmHg before treatment to 146 +/- 19 mmHg after treatment, and the diastolic HBP decreased significantly from 85 +/- 14 mmHg before treatment to 80 +/- 9 mmHg after treatment. The systolic, but not the diastolic CBP, decreased significantly after treatment. There was no significant difference in the systolic or diastolic values between the HBP and the CBP after treatment. The percentage change in the systolic HBP after treatment was three times greater than for the systolic CBP. The median (interquartile) urinary albumin excretion rate decreased significantly (P < 0.001) from 62 (25-203) mg/g creatinine before treatment to 19 (9-76) mg/g creatinine after treatment. On multiple regression analysis, the decrease in the systolic HBP with treatment positively correlated with the reduction in urinary excretion of albumin. The control of morning hypertension reduced the albuminuria found in both untreated and treated hypertensive patients with type-2 diabetes. Bedtime administration of doxazosin appears to be safe and effective in reducing morning hypertension as measured by HBP. This finding also demonstrates that HBP taken in the morning has a stronger predictive power for the albuminuria level than does CBP.     

The Bedtime Administration of Doxazosin Controls Morning Hypertension and Albuminuria in Patients with Type-2 Diabetes: Evaluation Using Home-Based Blood Pressure Measurements

The control of high blood pressure (BP) after awakening in the morning (morning hypertension) as determined by home BP (HBP), as well as BP control throughout the day, may prevent diabetic vascular complications. We examined the effect of an α-adrenergic blocker (doxazosin) on BP measurements taken by HBP after awakening and during clinic visits (CBP) in 50 patients with type-2 diabetes and morning hypertension. We evaluated the urinary albumin excretion rate as an indicator of nephropathy. Doxazosin was taken orally once at bedtime for 1 to 3 months. The mean (± SD) dose was 2.9 ± 2.1 mg/day (1 to 8 mg/day). The BP was measured monthly at the clinic during the day and at home after awakening in the morning. In this short-term trial (2.8 ± 0.4 months), the systolic HBP decreased significantly from 164 ± 17 mmHg before treatment to 146 ± 19 mmHg after treatment, and the diastolic HBP decreased significantly from 85 ± 14 mmHg before treatment to 80 ± 9 mmHg after treatment. The systolic, but not the diastolic CBP, decreased significantly after treatment. There was no significant difference in the systolic or diastolic values between the HBP and the CBP after treatment. The percentage change in the systolic HBP after treatment was three times greater than for the systolic CBP. The median (interquartile) urinary albumin excretion rate decreased significantly (P < 0.001) from 62 (25–203) mg/g creatinine before treatment to 19 (9–76) mg/g creatinine after treatment. On multiple regression analysis, the decrease in the systolic HBP with treatment positively correlated with the reduction in urinary excretion of albumin. The control of morning hypertension reduced the albuminuria found in both untreated and treated hypertensive patients with type-2 diabetes. Bedtime administration of doxazosin appears to be safe and effective in reducing morning hypertension as measured by HBP. This finding also demonstrates that HBP taken in the morning has a stronger predictive power for the albuminuria level than does CBP.