Graft-versus-host disease after nonmyeloablative versus conventional hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

It is unknown whether the severity, timing, and quality of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) may be different after nonmyeloablative as compared with myeloablative hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Therefore, GVHD incidence, morbidity of skin, liver, and gut, requirements for immunosuppressive therapy, and survival were retrospectively analyzed in 44 patients who underwent nonablative HSCT and 52 who underwent ablative HSCT (median ages, 56 and 54 years, respectively). The nonablative transplantation regimen consisted of low-dose total body irradiation (TBI), preceded in some patients by fludarabine administration and followed in all patients by immunosuppression with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and cyclosporine (CSP). Those who underwent myeloablative HSCT were prepared with different TBI- and non-TBI-containing regimens and received CSP plus methotrexate or MMF for GVHD prophylaxis. The cumulative incidence of grades II-IV acute GVHD was lower after nonablative transplantation (64% vs 85%; P =.001), but there were no differences in the cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD requiring treatment (73% vs 71%; P =.96). Nonablative transplantation was associated with the delayed initiation of steroid treatment for GVHD (0.95 months vs 3.0 months; P <.001) and with the use of fewer systemic immunosuppressants in the first 3 months after transplantation (P 相似文献   

Cytomegalovirus infections in allogeneic stem cell recipients after reduced-intensity or myeloablative conditioning assessed by quantitative PCR and pp65-antigenemia

Since the incidence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) may depend on the intensity of the pretreatment, we studied the incidence of CMV infections after reduced-intensity compared to myeloablative conditioning. A total of 82 patients with matched related or unrelated donors were prospectively monitored for CMV infections after HSCT by CMV-PCR techniques, CMV-antigenemia and clinical observation. A total of 45 patients received reduced-intensity conditioning consisting of fludarabine, busulfan and ATG and 37 patients received myeloablative conditioning. Leukocyte engraftment occurred after a median of 15 vs 18 days (P=0.012) and platelet engraftment after 12 days vs 20 days (P=0.001), respectively. Acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) grade II-IV was observed in 58 vs 54% patients (P=0.737), respectively. The onset and peak values of CMV-antigenemia and DNAemia and the incidence of CMV infections did not differ statistically significantly between the two treatment groups. Multivariate analysis confirmed CMV seropositivity of the recipient (P=0.035), acute GVHD II-IV (P=0.001) but not the type of conditioning as significant risk factors for CMV-antigenemia. In conclusion, the kinetics of CMV-antigenemia and DNAemia and the incidence of CMV infections were not statistically different in patients who received HSCT after reduced-intensity conditioning with fludarabine, busulfan and ATG compared to myeloablative conditioning.     

Mycophenolate‐based graft versus host disease prophylaxis is not inferior to methotrexate in myeloablative‐related donor stem cell transplantation

We retrospectively reviewed 242 patients who received related donor myeloablative peripheral blood hematopoietic cell transplantation. We compared patients who received mycophenolate (MMF)/cyclosporine (CSA) (n = 71), to historical controls who received methotrexate (MTX)/CSA (n = 172). There were no differences in overall survival, nonrelapse mortality, and relapse. The MMF/CSA group had significantly faster neutrophil and platelet engraftment: medians of 13 versus 18 days and 10 versus 14 days, respectively (P = 0.001). The cumulative incidence of acute graft versus host disease (GVHD) (Grades, 2–4) was significantly lower in the MMF/CSA group (45.1 vs. 74.4%, P < 0.001). The MMF/CSA group showed a lower incidence of skin (51.5 vs. 72.1%, P < 0.001) and liver acute GVHD (11.3 vs. 54.2%, P < 0.001) and a higher incidence of lung (42.2 vs. 19.0%, P = 0.045), eye (59.7 vs. 30.1%, P < 0.001), and mouth (72.8 vs. 56.4%, P = 0.001) chronic GVHD but only eye chronic GVHD was confirmed in propensity score matching (PSM) analysis. The incidence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) viremia was higher in the MMF/CSA group (55.8 vs. 39.6%, P < 0.001) but this was not confirmed in PSM analysis. MMF/CSA was identified as an independent favorable factor for acute GVHD (P < 0.001, hazard ratio, 0.41) but as a possible adverse risk factor for CMV viremia as this was not found to be statistically significant in PSM analysis. MMF/CSA in myeloablative matched related donor peripheral blood stem cell transplant is not inferior as GVHD prophylaxis in comparison with MTX/CSA and is associated with faster engraftment but a potentially higher risk of CMV viremia.Am. J. Hematol. 90:392–399, 2015. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Sirolimus-based graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis protects against cytomegalovirus reactivation after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a cohort analysis

Sirolimus-based immunosuppressive regimens in organ transplantation have been associated with a lower than expected incidence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease. Whether sirolimus has a similar effect on CMV reactivation after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is not known. We evaluated 606 patients who underwent HSCT between April 2000 and June 2004 to identify risk factors for CMV reactivation 100 days after transplantation. The cohort included 252 patients who received sirolimus-tacrolimus for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis; the rest received non-sirolimus-based regimens. An initial positive CMV DNA hybrid capture assay was observed in 225 patients (37.1%) at a median 39 days after HSCT for an incidence rate of 0.50 cases/100 patient-days (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.44-0.57). Multivariable Cox modeling adjusting for CMV donor-recipient serostatus pairs, incident acute GVHD, as well as other important covariates, confirmed a significant reduction in CMV reactivation associated with sirolimus-tacrolimus-based GVHD prophylaxis, with an adjusted HR of 0.46 (95% CI, 0.27-0.78; P = .004). The adjusted HR was 0.22 (95% CI, 0.09-0.55; P = .001) when persistent CMV viremia was modeled. Tacrolimus use without sirolimus was not significantly protective in either model (adjusted HR, 0.66; P = .14 and P = .35, respectively). The protective effect of sirolimus-containing GVHD prophylaxis regimens on CMV reactivation should be confirmed in randomized trials.     

Surveillance of cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNAemia in pediatric allogeneic stem cell transplantation: incidence and outcome of CMV infection and disease.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) remains a serious problem after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). To investigate the incidence of CMV infection and outcome we retrospectively analyzed 70 consecutive pediatric allogeneic HSCTs monitored by CMV polymerase chain reaction (PCR), with at least 1-year follow-up or until death. All patients at risk for CMV infection (CMV-seropositive patients and CMV-seronegative recipients transplanted from CMV-seropositive donors) received hyperimmune anti-CMV globulins whereas in the group of HSCT patients with both donor and recipient CMV negativity, polyvalent immunoglobulins were given, both at a dose of 400 mg/kg. All patients received acyclovir at prophylactic doses for at least 6 months. Patients were monitored twice a week by CMV PCR. Patients with 2 positive results for CMV DNAemia received ganciclovir for 14 days and continued until 2 consecutive negative results were obtained. The incidence of CMV DNAemia was 12.8% (9/70) in the whole group, with significant higher risk for patients with CMV-seropositive recipient status, 8 out of 22 (36%), vs. patients with seronegative status, 1 out of 48 (2%) (P=0.0002). Three out of 9 patients with DNAemia developed CMV disease despite adequate preemptive treatment. The transplant-related mortality was higher in the CMV-seropositive recipient group (P=0.05). Age, use of hyperimmune anti-CMV globulins at a high dose, and the low incidence of graft-versus-host disease might be contributing factors to this low incidence.     

Comparison of Myeloablative and Nonmyeloablative Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Treatment of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

This retrospective study compared outcomes for 81 chronic myeloid leukemia patients who underwent myeloablative or nonmyeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Sixty-five patients received myeloablative HSCT, and 16 patients received fludarabine (Fd), low-dose busulfan (Bu), and antithymocyte globulin (ATG) in nonmyeloablative HSCT. We determined overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), as well as the occurrence of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). The incidences of acute GVHD of grades II to IV were 14.0% and 18.7% for the myeloablative and nonmyeloablative groups, respectively. The incidence of chronic GVHD was significantly higher in the nonmyeloablative group (80% versus 66%). Five-year OS and DFS rates were significantly higher in nonmyeloablative group (70% for both), compared with 56% and 54%, respectively, for the myeloablative group. A univariate analysis, however, revealed a strong but statistically insignificant trend for enhanced overall OS and DFS in the nonmyeloablative group (P = .1 and .07, respectively). A multivariate analysis with the factors of treatment, age, sex, acute and chronic GVHD, and disease status at the time of transplantation revealed that both OS and DFS were significantly higher in the nonmyeloablative group than in the myeloablative group. These findings suggest that nonmyeloablative Fd/Bu/ATG treatment is at least not inferior (and quite probably superior) in terms of patient outcome compared with standard myeloablative therapy. Further larger-scale randomized clinical trials are warranted to clarify the efficacy of this treatment regimen.     

High-dose acyclovir and pre-emptive ganciclovir in prevention of cytomegalovirus disease in pediatric patients following peripheral blood stem cell transplantation

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease remains an important cause of morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). We evaluated high-dose acyclovir (HDACV) and pre-emptive ganciclovir to prevent CMV disease in 76 children who underwent peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) and were at risk for CMV reactivation and disease (both recipient and donor seropositive) from May 1998 to April 2003. All received HDACV from day -9 to 6 months post transplant in conjunction with weekly CMV pp65 antigenemia monitoring. The incidence of antigenemia in this cohort was 19.7%, at a median of 22 days post-PBSCT. The frequencies were 26.4 and 4.4% in allogeneic and autologous groups, respectively (P=0.03). Patients with nonmalignant disease had higher CMV antigenemia than those with malignant disease (30.8 vs 8.1%, P=0.02). Age at PBSCT, sex, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis regimen and presence of acute GVHD did not affect the risk of CMV antigenemia. None of the patients who had positive pp65 antigenemia developed CMV disease during the study period. We conclude that pp65 antigenemia-guided HDACV and pre-emptive ganciclovir may prevent CMV disease in children undergoing PBSCT.     

Virological, clinical, and ophthalmologic features of cytomegalovirus retinitis after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

We identified 10 patients who developed cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis after HSCT during a 14-year period. The median day of diagnosis of CMV retinitis after transplantation was day 251 (range, days 106--365). CMV retinitis was associated with CMV serostatus of donor or recipient (P=0.01), CMV reactivation before day 100 (P=0.007), delayed lymphocyte engraftment (P<0.05), and chronic graft versus host disease (GVHD; P<0.001). In allogeneic recipients of HSCT who were alive at day 100 after transplantation and had chronic clinical extensive GVHD, the incidence of GVHD was 1.4% (8 of 577). Five of 10 patients had other manifestation of CMV disease before retinitis occurred (4 with gastrointestinal disease and 1 with interstitial pneumonia; median time, 70 days before onset of CMV retinitis; range, 58--279 days), and 4 others had CMV excretion. CMV retinitis was bilateral in 4 patients; 9 of 10 patients had ocular symptoms (i.e., decreased vision and floaters). Six of 7 patients responded well to ganciclovir or foscarnet systemic treatment, 1 improved only after switching to cidofovir, and 1 patient who received a transplant in 1983 did not respond to acyclovir treatment. In conclusion, CMV retinitis is an uncommon late complication after HSCT that occurs mainly in seropositive allograft recipients with previous CMV reactivation and chronic GVHD, and with delayed engraftment of lymphocytes.     

Risks and outcomes of idiopathic pneumonia syndrome after nonmyeloablative and conventional conditioning regimens for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Idiopathic pneumonia syndrome (IPS) is a significant noninfectious complication of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). We compared the incidences and outcomes of IPS among patients who underwent allogeneic HSCT after nonmyeloablative (n = 183) compared with conventional (n = 917) conditioning between December 1997 and December 2001. Patients given nonmyeloablative conditioning were older than those given conventional conditioning (median ages, 53 vs 41 years; P =.001). The cumulative incidence of IPS was significantly lower at 120 days after nonmyeloablative conditioning than conventional conditioning (2.2% vs 8.4%; P =.003). In addition, greater patient age (older than 40 years), diagnosis of acute leukemia or myelodys-plastic syndrome, and severe acute graft-versus-host disease were associated with significantly increased risks for IPS. Among older patients (older than 40 years) given conventional conditioning, high-dose total body irradiation (TBI) was associated with an increased risk for IPS than were non-TBI-based regimens (16% vs 5.8%; P =.001). IPS occurred early after transplantation, progressed rapidly, and was associated with a high mortality rate (75%) despite aggressive support. Initiation of mechanical ventilation and the presence of renal insufficiency at IPS onset were associated with increased risks for death after IPS. These findings support the concept that lung damage from the conditioning regimen plays a crucial role in the development of IPS after HSCT.     

Increased risk of complicated CMV infection with the use of mycophenolate mofetil in allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is increasingly used for prophylaxis and therapy of GVHD in allogeneic stem cell transplantation. In some recent reports of use of MMF in solid organ transplantation a high incidence of CMV disease has been described. We evaluated the frequency and course of active CMV infection in patients who received MMF compared to those who did not receive MMF after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. We retrospectively analyzed 48 adult patients who consecutively underwent unmanipulated allogeneic bone marrow (n = 15) or peripheral stem cell transplantation (n = 33) from HLA-compatible family donors (n = 30) or unrelated donors (n = 18) from February 1997 to September 2000 at our institution. Only patients who were evaluable for the first 100 days were included in this analysis. Sixteen patients received MMF post transplant (MMF+). CMV-antigenemia was monitored by CMV-pp65 antigen. CMV-antigenemia occurred in 14 patients and was virtually only observed in CMV-IgG+ recipients (13/23, 56%). CMV-IgG+/MMF+ patients developed a higher incidence of CMV-antigenemia (8/9, 89%) compared to the CMV-IgG+/MMF- patients (5/14, 35%; P < 0.05). Moreover, five of six patients with persistent or recurrent CMV-antigenemia received MMF. No patient in either group developed CMV disease or died of CMV-related complications. In multivariate analysis including MMF treatment, unrelated vs related donor, GVHD, CMV-serostatus of the donor and stem cell graft type, only MMF treatment was found to be a significant risk factor for both overall and complicated CMV infection.     

Delayed donor red cell chimerism and pure red cell aplasia following major ABO-incompatible nonmyeloablative hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Delayed donor red cell engraftment and pure red cell aplasia (PRCA) are well-recognized complications of major ABO-incompatible hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (SCT) performed by means of myeloablative conditioning. To evaluate these events following reduced-intensity nonmyeloablative SCT (NST), consecutive series of patients with major ABO incompatibility undergoing either NST (fludarabine/cyclophosphamide conditioning) or myeloablative SCT (cyclophosphamide/high-dose total body irradiation) were compared. Donor red blood cell (RBC) chimerism (initial detection of donor RBCs in peripheral blood) was markedly delayed following NST versus myeloablative SCT (median, 114 versus 40 days; P <.0001) and strongly correlated with decreasing host antidonor isohemagglutinin levels. Antidonor isohemagglutinins declined to clinically insignificant levels more slowly following NST than myeloablative SCT (median, 83 versus 44 days; P =.03). Donor RBC chimerism was delayed more than 100 days in 9 of 14 (64%) and PRCA occurred in 4 of 14 (29%) patients following NST, while neither event occurred in 12 patients following myeloablative SCT. Conversion to full donor myeloid chimerism following NST occurred significantly sooner in cases with, compared with cases without, PRCA (30 versus 98 days; P =.008). Cyclosporine withdrawal appeared to induce graft-mediated immune effects against recipient isohemagglutinin-producing cells, resulting in decreased antidonor isohemagglutinin levels and resolution of PRCA following NST. These data indicate that significantly delayed donor erythropoiesis is (1) common following major ABO-incompatible NST and (2) associated with prolonged persistence of host antidonor isohemagglutinins. The clinical manifestations of these events are affected by the degree and duration of residual host hematopoiesis.     

Pre‐transplant cytomegalovirus (CMV) serostatus remains the most important determinant of CMV reactivation after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in the era of surveillance and preemptive therapy

B. George, N. Pati, N. Gilroy, M. Ratnamohan, G. Huang, I. Kerridge, M. Hertzberg, D. Gottlieb, K. Bradstock. Pre‐transplant cytomegalovirus (CMV) serostatus remains the most important determinant of CMV reactivation after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in the era of surveillance and preemptive therapy.
Transpl Infect Dis 2010: 12: 322–329. All rights reserved Abstract: Between January 2001 and June 2008, 315 adult patients (median age 43 years, range 16–65) including 203 males and 112 females undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) had serial monitoring for cytomegalovirus (CMV) followed by initiation of preemptive therapy. The majority (62.1%) had a conventional myeloablative transplant with 116 (36.9%) having a reduced‐intensity conditioning (RIC) transplant, using either matched sibling/family (63.3%) or unrelated donors (36.7%). Graft source was peripheral blood stem cells in 257 (81.5%), bone marrow in 41 (13.1%), and cord blood in 16 (5.4%). T‐cell depletion with anti‐thymocyte globulin or alemtuzumab was used in 35%. Based upon CMV serostatus, patients were classified into low risk (donor [D]?/recipient [R]?), intermediate risk (D+/R?), or high risk (D?/R+ or D+/R+). Serial weekly monitoring for CMV viremia was performed using a qualitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and when positive, quantification was done using either pp65 antigen or a quantitative PCR. CMV reactivation was seen in 123 patients (39.1%) at a median of 50 days post HSCT (range 22–1978). CMV serostatus was the most important risk factor with incidence of 53% in the high‐risk group (53.3%) compared with 10.2% in the intermediate risk and 0% in the low‐risk group (P<0.0001). Other significant risk factors identified included use of alemtuzumab during conditioning (P=0.03), RIC transplants (P=0.06), and the presence of acute graft‐versus‐host disease (GVHD) (P<0.0001). On a multivariate analysis, CMV serostatus, RIC transplants, and acute GVHD remained independent predictors of CMV reactivation. All were treated with antiviral therapy with responses seen in 109 (88.6%). Sixteen patients (13%) developed CMV disease at a median of 59 days post HSCT (range 26 days–46 months), 8 of whom died. At a median follow up of 43 months (range 6–93), 166 patients (52.6%) are alive with a significantly higher survival among patients without CMV reactivation (57.2%) as compared with patients with CMV reactivation (45.5%; P=0.049). CMV reactivation and disease remains a major problem in high‐risk patients undergoing allogeneic HSCT. Novel prophylactic measures such as immunotherapy and drug prophylaxis need to be considered in this specific group of patients.     

Risk for cytomegalovirus infection following reduced intensity allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Preliminary data suggest a faster immune recovery following non-myeloablative stem cell transplantation because of the persistence of recipient T cells, but the real impact on post-transplant infectious complications remains unknown. We retrospectively analysed the incidence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in twenty patients following reduced intensity conditioning with busulfan/fludarabine±thiotepa and post-transplant immunosuppression with cyclosporine A/mycophenolate mofetil. Results were compared with 20 patients receiving myeloablative transplants during the same time period and who were matched for CMV risk group and for donor origin. The cumulative incidence of CMV infection following reduced intensity vs. myeloablative transplants was 60.4% vs. 40.0%, respectively (p value 0.1, log rank test). The risk for CMV infection in both cohorts was increased after in vivo T cell depletion with antithymocyte globulin (75% and 60%, respectively). Acute GVHD preceded the diagnosis of CMV infection by a median of 25 (range, 9–61) days following reduced intensity transplants and a median of 14 (range, 10–34) days in myeloablative transplants. Recurrent CMV infections were observed only in patients receiving reduced intensity transplants. Using multivariate analysis only reduced intensity transplantation and in vivo T cell depletion had a significant impact on the risk of CMV infection. In our series the incidence for CMV infection following reduced intensity transplants seems to be increased as compared with risk-matched myeloablative transplants. When adding anti-T cell antibodies to the conditioning regimen, the risk for CMV infection increases by up to 75%. Thorough studies of the risk of post-transplant viral infection are necessary to optimize surveillance as well as pre-emptive and/or prophylactic treatment strategies in the non-myeloablative transplantation setting.     

Infections after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with a nonmyeloablative conditioning regimen

Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) following nonmyeloablative conditioning (NMSCT) may be associated with a reduced risk of infection compared to standard allogeneic HCT. We retrospectively analyzed incidence and risk factors of infection in 62 patients undergoing NMSCT with low-dose TBI +/- fludarabine and postgrafting CsA and MMF. The proportion of patients with any infection was 77%, but the majority of infectious events occurred beyond day 30. Donor other than sibling, older age, early disease and male gender were significant risk factors. The incidence of bacteremia was 55% at 1 year and the number of bacteremic episodes was 0.9 per patient (0.08 before day 30). The risk of bacteremia increased with older age and the use of a donor other than an HLA-identical sibling, but not with neutropenia. The incidence of infections other than bacteremia correlated with the use of corticosteroids. The risk of CMV infection increased with high-risk CMV serology, and risk of CMV disease with high-risk CMV serology, older age, first transplantation and a diagnosis of lymphoma. In conclusion, after NMSCT, infections are not frequent in the first 30 days post transplant but careful long-term monitoring is necessary thereafter.     

High-dose acyclovir and pre-emptive ganciclovir to prevent cytomegalovirus disease in myeloablative and non-myeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation

We evaluated high-dose acyclovir and pre-emptive ganciclovir to prevent cytomegalovirus disease in myeloablative and non-myeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation. One hundred and seventy-four consecutive patients who were at risk for CMV infection (either recipient or donor seropositive) and received either intensive chemoradiotherapy and a T cell-depleted stem cell transplant followed by delayed add-back of donor T cells (TCDT: n = 98), or a non-myeloablative preparative regimen followed by an unmanipulated peripheral blood stem cell transplant (NMT: n = 76) from an HLA-identical sibling donor were studied. All received high-dose acyclovir (HDACV) from day - 7 for 3 months post-transplant in conjunction with weekly CMV pp65 antigenemia monitoring and pre-emptive treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin (not CMV-specific) and ganciclovir. The actuarial probabilities of developing pp65 antigenemia were 83 +/- 4% after TCDT and 41 +/- 6% after NMT (P < 0.00001) with reactivation occurring earlier in the TCDT group (the median 36 days vs 55 days). We observed no reactivation of CMV in seronegative recipients with a seropositive donor (n = 23). A total of 11 patients (5 in TCDT, 6 in NMT) developed CMV disease within 400 days after transplantation, and one death was clearly attributable to CMV interstitial pneumonitis (IP). This strategy was associated with effective control of CMV antigenemia in the majority of patients and near-complete eradication of fatal CMV IP.     

Risks and outcomes of invasive fungal infections in recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplants after nonmyeloablative conditioning

The incidence of invasive mold infections has increased during the 1990s among patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) after myeloablative conditioning. In this study, we determined risk factors for invasive mold infection and mold infection-related death among 163 patients undergoing allogeneic HCT with nonmyeloablative conditioning. The cumulative incidence rates of proven or probable invasive fungal infections, invasive mold infections, invasive aspergillosis, and invasive candidiasis during the first year after allogeneic HCT with nonmyeloablative conditioning were 19%, 15%, 14%, and 5%, respectively, which were similar to those after conventional myeloablative HCT. Invasive mold infections occurred late after nonmyeloablative conditioning (median, day 107), with primary risk factors including severe acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), chronic extensive GVHD, and cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease. The 1-year survival after diagnosis of mold infections was 32%. High-dose corticosteroid therapy at diagnosis of mold infection was associated with an increased risk for mold infection-related death. Overall, nonrelapse mortality was estimated at 22% (36 patients) after nonmyeloablative conditioning, of which 39% (14 patients) were mold infection-related (9% of the overall mortality). More effective strategies are needed to prevent invasive mold infections, which currently account for a notable proportion of nonrelapse mortality after nonmyeloablative allogeneic HCT.     

抢先抗巨细胞病毒治疗策略在不同类型造血干细胞移植中的疗效比较

目的 对不同类型异基因造血干细胞移植(HSCT)的巨细胞病毒(CMV)感染患者采用统一的抢先治疗指征,比较抗病毒治疗的效果,从而评价抢先治疗策略的临床应用价值.方法 进行异基因HSCT患者318例,自移植后采用实时定量(RQ)-PCR法监测血浆CMV-DNA水平,其中136例出现CMV感染,全相合HSCT 31例,亲缘半相合HSCT 88例,非血缘HSCT 17例.三种类型移植采用相同的抗病毒抢先治疗指征,比较CMV-DNA拷贝数的转阴率、CMV病的发生率及患者的长期生存率.结果 136例CMV感染患者分别采用更昔洛韦、膦甲酸钠或缬更昔洛韦进行抗病毒抢先治疗,全相合、半相合及非血缘移植组治疗的中位时间相近,三组患者CMV-DNA最终转阴率相似(96.8%,93.2%,88.2%),组间比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).抢先治疗后三组患者发生CMV肺炎及肠炎的比例及死于CMV病几率的差异也无统计学意义(P>0.05).各类型移植患者的长期生存率差异无统计学意义(P=0.88),发生Ⅱ～Ⅳ度急性移植物抗宿主病(aGVHD)患者生存率明显低于0～Ⅰ度aGVHD患者(P=0.036).结论 不同类型造血干细胞移植术后的CMV感染患者,采用基于RQ-PCR监测的抢先治疗策略可达到相同的疗效.     

A prospective randomized trial comparing cyclosporine and short course methotrexate with cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil for GVHD prophylaxis in myeloablative allogeneic bone marrow transplantation

Cyclosporine (CSP) and short course methotrexate (MTX) have been the gold standard for GVHD prophylaxis for decades. Problems associated with MTX include increased time to hematopoietic engraftment, mucositis, and other organ toxicities. The combination of CSP with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has been used successfully for the prevention of graft rejection and GVHD in nonmyeloablative transplantation. We performed a prospective randomized trial comparing CSP and MTX with CSP and MMF in myeloablative (busulfan based) allogeneic 6/6 matched sibling bone marrow transplantation (BMT). The group receiving MMF (n = 21) had significantly less severe mucositis than did the group receiving MTX (n = 19) (21 vs 65%, P = 0.008). Median time to neutrophil engraftment was more rapid in the MMF group (11 vs 18 days, P < 0.001). The incidence of acute GVHD, as well as 100 day survival, was similar for both groups. The reduced toxicity of the CSP and MMF arm resulted in premature study closure. We conclude that a GVHD prophylaxis regimen of CSP and MMF after a myeloablative allogeneic preparative regimen is associated with faster hematopoietic engraftment, decreased incidence of mucositis, similar incidence of aGVHD, and comparable survival as compared to CSP and MTX.     

Review of “Minitransplantation”: Nonmyeloablative Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Nonmyeloablative conditioning regimens for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) have been developed over the past few years as important alternatives to conventional myeloablative conditioning regimens for older or medically unfit patients with hematologic malignancies, as well as for patients with certain nonmalignant hematologic diseases or renal cell cancer. This review summarizes the biological background, current clinical applications, and indications for this novel treatment approach for treating hematologic malignancies. Historically, allogeneic HSCT has been based on the use of cytotoxic and myeloablative chemotherapy and radiotherapy conditioning regimens that are intended both to eradicate malignancy and to eliminate host hematopoiesis and immune cells. Such a regimen was followed by the infusion of histocompatible donor marrow or peripheral blood stem cells to rescue hematopoiesis. For older patients or for those who had previously been treated with intensive chemotherapy or radiotherapy, the toxicity of myeloablative conditioning was prohibitive. Although most hematologic malignancies occur in older patients, these patients had not been previously eligible for the potentially curative therapy offered by allogeneic HSCT. Based in large part on preclinical studies with the dog model of HSCT and on an improved understanding of the mechanisms for controlling immune modulation, successful development of nonmyeloablative conditioning regimens for clinical use has occurred. Clear evidence of a therapeutic graft-versus-tumor effect mediated by allogeneic T-cells prompted an exploration for HSCT regimens that rely solely on nonmyeloablative immunosuppression to facilitate allogeneic engraftment. In lieu of intensive chemoradiotherapy before transplantation, engrafted donor T-cells are used to accomplish the task of eradicating the host's malignant cells. We review the updated results of an ongoing multicenter study to investigate the safety and efficacy of nonmyeloablative HSCT using a regimen of 2 Gy total body irradiation in patients with advanced hematologic malignancies who were ineligible for conventional myeloablative conditioning. In addition, we review the results of reduced-intensity HSCT trials from other transplantation centers.