Alveolar recruitment improves ventilatory efficiency of the lungs during anesthesia

PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to analyze the effect of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), with and without a lung recruitment maneuver, on dead space. METHODS: 16 anesthetized patients were sequentially studied in three steps: 1) without PEEP (ZEEP), 2) with 5 cm H(2)O of PEEP and 3) with 5 cm H(2)O of PEEP after an alveolar recruitment strategy (ARS). Ventilation was maintained constant. The single breath test of CO(2) (SBT-CO(2)), arterial oxygenation, end-expiratory lung volume (EELV) and respiratory compliance were recorded every 30 min. RESULTS: Physiological dead space to tidal volume decreased after ARS (0.45 +/- 0.01) compared with ZEEP (0.50 +/- 0.07, P < 0.05) and PEEP (0.51 +/- 0.06, P < 0.05). The elimination of CO(2) per breath increased during PEEP (25 +/- 3.3 mL.min(-1)) and ARS (27 +/- 3.2 mL.min(-1)) compared to ZEEP (23 +/- 2.6 mL.min(-1), P < 0.05), although ARS showed larger values than PEEP (P < 0.05). Pa-etCO(2) difference was lower after recruitment (0.9 +/- 0.5 kPa, P < 0.05) compared to ZEEP (1.1 +/- 0.5 kPa) and PEEP (1.2 +/- 0.5 kPa). Slope II increased after ARS (63 +/- 11%/L, P < 0.05) compared with ZEEP (46 +/- 7.7%/L) and PEEP (56 +/- 10%/L). Slope III decreased significantly after recruitment (0.13 +/- 0.07 1/L) compared with ZEEP (0.21 +/- 0.11 1/L) and PEEP (0.18 +/- 0.10 1/L). The angle between slope II and III decreased only after ARS. After lung recruitment, PaO(2), EELV, and compliance increased significantly compared with ZEEP and PEEP. CONCLUSION: Lung recruitment improved the efficiency of ventilation in anesthetized patients.     

Effects of Positive End-expiratory Pressure and Different Tidal Volumes on Alveolar Recruitment and Hyperinflation

Background: The morphologic effect of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and of two tidal volumes were studied by computed tomography to determine whether setting the tidal volume (Vt) at the upper inflection point (UIP) of the pressure-volume (P-V) curve of the respiratory system or 10 ml/kg have different effects on hyperinflation and alveolar recruitment.

Methods: Alveolar recruitment and hyperinflation were quantified by computed tomography in nine patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). First, end expiration was compared without PEEP and with PEEP set at the lower inflection point of the P-V curve; second, at end inspiration above PEEP, a reduced Vt set at the UIP (rVt) and a standard 10 ml/kg Vt (Vt) ending above the UIP were compared. Three lung zones were defined from computed tomographic densities: hyperdense, normal, and hyperinflated zones.

Results: Positive end-expiratory pressure induced a significant decrease in hyperdensities (from 46.8 +/- 18% to 38 +/- 15.1% of zero end-expiratory pressure (ZEEP) area; P < 0.02) with a concomitant increase in normal zones (from 47.3 +/- 20.9% to 56.5 +/- 13.2% of the ZEEP area; P < 0.05), and a significant increase in hyperinflation (from 8.1 +/- 5.9% to 17.8 +/- 12.7% of ZEEP area; P < 0.01). At end inspiration, a significant increase in hyperinflated areas was observed with Vt compared with rVt (33.4 +/- 17.8 vs. 26.8 +/- 17.3% of ZEEP area; P < 0.05), whereas no significant difference was observed for both normal and hyperdense zones.     

'Alveolar recruitment strategy' improves arterial oxygenation during general anaesthesia

Abnormalities in gas exchange during general anaesthesia are caused partly by atelectasis. Inspiratory pressures of approximately 40 cm H2O are required to fully re-expand healthy but collapsed alveoli. However, without PEEP these re-expanded alveoli tend to collapse again. We hypothesized that an initial increase in pressure would open collapsed alveoli; if this inspiratory recruitment is combined with sufficient end-expiratory pressure, alveoli will remain open during general anaesthesia. We tested the effect of an 'alveolar recruitment strategy' on arterial oxygenation and lung mechanics in a prospective, controlled study of 30 ASA II or III patients aged more than 60 yr allocated to one of three groups. Group ZEEP received no PEEP. The second group received an initial control period without PEEP, and then PEEP 5 cm H2O was applied. The third group received an increase in PEEP and tidal volumes until a PEEP of 15 cm H2O and a tidal volume of 18 ml kg-1 or a peak inspiratory pressure of 40 cm H2O was reached. PEEP 5 cm H2O was then maintained. There was a significant increase in median PaO2 values obtained at baseline (20.4 kPa) and those obtained after the recruitment manoeuvre (24.4 kPa) at 40 min. This latter value was also significantly higher than PaO2 measured in the PEEP (16.2 kPa) and ZEEP (18.7 kPa) groups. Application of PEEP also had a significant effect on oxygenation; no such intra-group difference was observed in the ZEEP group. No complications occurred. We conclude that during general anaesthesia, the alveolar recruitment strategy was an efficient way to improve arterial oxygenation.      

Alveolar Recruitment in Pulmonary and Extrapulmonary Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Comparison Using Pressure-Volume Curve or Static Compliance

Background: Alveolar recruitment in response to positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) may differ between pulmonary and extrapulmonary acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and alveolar recruitment values may differ when measured by pressure-volume curve compared with static compliance.

Methods: The authors compared PEEP-induced alveolar recruitment in 71 consecutive patients identified in a database. Patients were classified as having pulmonary, extrapulmonary, or mixed/uncertain ARDS. Pressure-volume curves with and without PEEP were available for all patients, and pressure-volume curves with two PEEP levels were available for 44 patients. Static compliance was calculated as tidal volume divided by pressure change for tidal volumes of 400 and 700 ml. Recruited volume was measured at an elastic pressure of 15 cm H2O.

Results: Volume recruited by PEEP (10 +/- 3 cm H2O) was 223 +/- 111 ml in the pulmonary ARDS group (29 patients), 206 +/- 164 ml in the extrapulmonary group (16 patients), and 242 +/- 176 ml in the mixed/uncertain group (26 patients) (P = 0.75). At high PEEP (14 +/- 2 cmH2O, 44 patients), recruited volumes were also similar (P = 0.60). With static compliance, recruitment was markedly underestimated and was dependent on tidal volume (226 +/- 148 ml using pressure-volume curve, 95 +/- 185 ml for a tidal volume of 400 ml, and 23 +/- 169 ml for 700 ml; P < 0.001).     

Alveolar recruitment in pulmonary and extrapulmonary acute respiratory distress syndrome: comparison using pressure-volume curve or static compliance

BACKGROUND: Alveolar recruitment in response to positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) may differ between pulmonary and extrapulmonary acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and alveolar recruitment values may differ when measured by pressure-volume curve compared with static compliance. METHODS: The authors compared PEEP-induced alveolar recruitment in 71 consecutive patients identified in a database. Patients were classified as having pulmonary, extrapulmonary, or mixed/uncertain ARDS. Pressure-volume curves with and without PEEP were available for all patients, and pressure-volume curves with two PEEP levels were available for 44 patients. Static compliance was calculated as tidal volume divided by pressure change for tidal volumes of 400 and 700 ml. Recruited volume was measured at an elastic pressure of 15 cm H2O. RESULTS: Volume recruited by PEEP (10 +/- 3 cm H2O) was 223 +/- 111 ml in the pulmonary ARDS group (29 patients), 206 +/- 164 ml in the extrapulmonary group (16 patients), and 242 +/- 176 ml in the mixed/uncertain group (26 patients) (P = 0.75). At high PEEP (14 +/- 2 cmH2O, 44 patients), recruited volumes were also similar (P = 0.60). With static compliance, recruitment was markedly underestimated and was dependent on tidal volume (226 +/- 148 ml using pressure-volume curve, 95 +/- 185 ml for a tidal volume of 400 ml, and 23 +/- 169 ml for 700 ml; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In a large sample of patients, classification of ARDS was uncertain in more than one third of patients, and alveolar recruitment was similar in pulmonary and extrapulmonary ARDS. PEEP levels should not be determined based on cause of ARDS.     

Effects of Recruitment Maneuver on Atelectasis in Anesthetized Children

Background: General anesthesia is known to promote atelectasis formation. High inspiratory pressures are required to reexpand healthy but collapsed alveoli. However, in the absence of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), reexpanded alveoli collapse again. Using magnetic resonance imaging, the impact of an alveolar recruitment strategy on the amount and distribution of atelectasis was tested.

Methods: The authors prospectively randomized 24 children who met American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II criteria, were aged 6 months-6 yr, and were undergoing cranial magnetic resonance imaging into three groups. After anesthesia induction, in the alveolar recruitment strategy (ARS) group, an alveolar recruitment maneuver was performed by manually ventilating the lungs with a peak airway pressure of 40 cm H2O and a PEEP of 15 cm H2O for 10 breaths. PEEP was then reduced to and kept at 5 cm H2O. The continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) group received 5 cm H2O of continuous positive airway pressure without recruitment. The zero end-expiratory pressure (ZEEP) group received neither PEEP nor the recruitment maneuver. All patients breathed spontaneously during the procedure. After cranial magnetic resonance imaging, thoracic magnetic resonance imaging was performed.

Results: The atelectatic volume (median, first and third standard quartiles) detected in the ZEEP group was 1.25 (0.75-4.56) cm3 in the right lung and 4.25 (3.2-13.9) cm3 in the left lung. The CPAP group had 9.5 (3.1-23.7) cm3 of collapsed lung tissue in the right lung and 8.8 (5.3-28.5) cm3 in the left lung. Only one patient in the ARS group presented an atelectasis of less than 2 cm3. An uneven distribution of the atelectasis was observed within each lung and between the right and left lungs, with a clear predominance of the left basal paradiaphragmatic regions.     

Effects of recruitment maneuver on atelectasis in anesthetized children

BACKGROUND: General anesthesia is known to promote atelectasis formation. High inspiratory pressures are required to reexpand healthy but collapsed alveoli. However, in the absence of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), reexpanded alveoli collapse again. Using magnetic resonance imaging, the impact of an alveolar recruitment strategy on the amount and distribution of atelectasis was tested. METHODS: The authors prospectively randomized 24 children who met American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II criteria, were aged 6 months-6 yr, and were undergoing cranial magnetic resonance imaging into three groups. After anesthesia induction, in the alveolar recruitment strategy (ARS) group, an alveolar recruitment maneuver was performed by manually ventilating the lungs with a peak airway pressure of 40 cm H2O and a PEEP of 15 cm H2O for 10 breaths. PEEP was then reduced to and kept at 5 cm H2O. The continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) group received 5 cm H2O of continuous positive airway pressure without recruitment. The zero end-expiratory pressure (ZEEP) group received neither PEEP nor the recruitment maneuver. All patients breathed spontaneously during the procedure. After cranial magnetic resonance imaging, thoracic magnetic resonance imaging was performed. RESULTS: The atelectatic volume (median, first and third standard quartiles) detected in the ZEEP group was 1.25 (0.75-4.56) cm3 in the right lung and 4.25 (3.2-13.9) cm3 in the left lung. The CPAP group had 9.5 (3.1-23.7) cm3 of collapsed lung tissue in the right lung and 8.8 (5.3-28.5) cm3 in the left lung. Only one patient in the ARS group presented an atelectasis of less than 2 cm3. An uneven distribution of the atelectasis was observed within each lung and between the right and left lungs, with a clear predominance of the left basal paradiaphragmatic regions. CONCLUSION: Frequency of atelectasis was much less following the alveolar recruitment strategy, compared with children who did not have the maneuver performed. The mere application of 5 cm H2O of CPAP without a prior recruitment did not show the same treatment effect and showed no difference compared to the control group without PEEP.     

Effects of lung recruitment maneuver and positive end-expiratory pressure on lung volume,respiratory mechanics and alveolar gas mixing in patients ventilated after cardiac surgery

BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is needed to maintain the improved oxygenation and lung volume achieved after a lung recruitment maneuver in patients ventilated after cardiac surgery performed in the cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). METHODS: A prospective, randomized, controlled study in a university hospital intensive care unit. Sixteen patients who had undergone cardiac surgery in CPB were studied during the recovery phase while still being mechanically ventilated with an inspired fraction of oxygen (FiO2) 1.0. Eight patients were randomized to lung recruitment (two 20-s inflations to 45 cmH2O), after which PEEP was set and kept for 2.5 h at 1 cmH2O above the pressure at the lower inflexion point (14+/-3 cmH2O, mean +/-SD) obtained from a static pressure-volume (PV) curve (PEEP group). The remaining eight patients were randomized to a recruitment maneuver only (ZEEP group). End-expiratory lung volume (EELV), series dead space, ventilation homogeneity, hemodynamics and PaO2 (oxygenation) were measured every 30 min during a 3-h period. PV curves were obtained at baseline, after 2.5 h, and in the PEEP group at 3 h. RESULTS: In the ZEEP group all measures were unchanged. In the PEEP group the EELV increased with 1220+/-254 ml (P<0.001) and PaO2 with 16+/-16 kPa (P<0.05) after lung recruitment. When PEEP was discontinued EELV decreased but PaO2 was maintained. The PV curve at 2.5 h coincided with the curve obtained at 3 h, and both curves were both steeper than and located above the baseline curve. CONCLUSIONS: Positive end-expiratory pressure is required after a lung recruitment maneuver in patients ventilated with high FiO2 after cardiac surgery to maintain lung volumes and the improved oxygenation.     

Regional gas exchange and cellular metabolic activity in ventilator-induced lung injury

BACKGROUND: Alveolar overdistension and repetitive derecruitment-recruitment contribute to ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). The authors investigated (1) whether inflammatory cell activation due to VILI was assessable by positron emission tomography and (2) whether cell activation due to dynamic overdistension alone was detectable when other manifestations of VILI were not yet evident. METHODS: The authors assessed cellular metabolic activity with [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose and regional gas exchange with [(13)N]nitrogen. In 12 sheep, the left ("test") lung was overdistended with end-inspiratory pressure of 50 cm H(2)O for 90 min, while end-expiratory derecruitment of this lung was either promoted with end-expiratory pressure of -10 cm H(2)O in 6 of these sheep (negative end-expiratory pressure [NEEP] group) or prevented with +10 cm H(2)O in the other 6 (positive end-expiratory pressure [PEEP] group) to isolate the effect of overdistension. The right ("control") lung was protected from VILI. RESULTS: Aeration decreased and shunt fraction increased in the test lung of the NEEP group. [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose uptake of this lung was higher than that of the control lung and of the test lung of the PEEP group, and correlated with neutrophil count. When normalized by tissue fraction to account for increased aeration of the test lung in the PEEP group, [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose uptake was elevated also in this group, despite the fact that gas exchange had not yet deteriorated after 90 min of overdistension alone. CONCLUSION: The authors could detect regional neutrophil activation in VILI even when end-expiratory derecruitment was prevented and impairment of gas exchange was not evident. Concomitant end-expiratory derecruitment converted this activation into profound inflammation with decreased aeration and regional shunting.     

Effects of the Beach Chair Position, Positive End-expiratory Pressure, and Pneumoperitoneum on Respiratory Function in Morbidly Obese Patients during Anesthesia and Paralysis

Background: The authors studied the effects of the beach chair (BC) position, 10 cm H2O positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), and pneumoperitoneum on respiratory function in morbidly obese patients undergoing laparoscopic gastric banding.

Methods: The authors studied 20 patients (body mass index 42 +/- 5 kg/m2) during the supine and BC positions, before and after pneumoperitoneum was instituted (13.6 +/- 1.2 mmHg). PEEP was applied during each combination of position and pneumoperitoneum. The authors measured elastance (E,rs) of the respiratory system, end-expiratory lung volume (helium technique), and arterial oxygen tension. Pressure-volume curves were also taken (occlusion technique). Patients were paralyzed during total intravenous anesthesia. Tidal volume (10.5 +/- 1 ml/kg ideal body weight) and respiratory rate (11 +/- 1 breaths/min) were kept constant throughout.

Results: In the supine position, respiratory function was abnormal: E,rs was 21.71 +/- 5.26 cm H2O/l, and end-expiratory lung volume was 0.46 +/- 0.1 l. Both the BC position and PEEP improved E,rs (P < 0.01). End-expiratory lung volume almost doubled (0.83 +/- 0.3 and 0.85 +/- 0.3 l, BC and PEEP, respectively; P < 0.01 vs. supine zero end-expiratory pressure), with no evidence of lung recruitment (0.04 +/- 0.1 l in the supine and 0.07 +/- 0.2 in the BC position). PEEP was associated with higher airway pressures than the BC position (22.1 +/- 2.01 vs. 13.8 +/- 1.8 cm H2O; P < 0.01). Pneumoperitoneum further worsened E,rs (31.59 +/- 6.73; P < 0.01) and end-expiratory lung volume (0.35 +/- 0.1 l; P < 0.01). Changes of lung volume correlated with changes of oxygenation (linear regression, R2 = 0.524, P < 0.001) so that during pneumoperitoneum, only the combination of the BC position and PEEP improved oxygenation.     

Effects of Mechanical Ventilation on Release of Cytokines into Systemic Circulation in Patients with Normal Pulmonary Function

Background: Mechanical ventilation with high tidal volumes (VT) in contrast to mechanical ventilation with low VT has been shown to increase plasma levels of proinflammatory and antiinflammatory mediators in patients with acute lung injury. The authors hypothesized that, in patients without previous lung injury, a conventional potentially injurious ventilatory strategy with high VT and zero end-expiratory pressure (ZEEP) will not cause a cytokine release into systemic circulation.

Methods: A total of 39 patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-II and without signs of systemic infection scheduled for elective surgery with general anesthesia were randomized to receive mechanical ventilation with either (1) VT = 15 ml/kg ideal body weight on ZEEP, (2) VT = 6 ml/kg ideal body weight on ZEEP, or (3) VT = 6 ml/kg ideal body weight on positive end-expiratory pressure of 10 cm H2O. Plasma levels of proinflammatory and antiinflammatory mediators tumor necrosis factor, interleukin (IL)-6, IL-10, and IL-1 receptor antagonist were determined before and 1 h after the initiation of mechanical ventilation.

Results: Plasma levels of all cytokines remained low in all settings. IL-6, tumor necrosis factor, and IL-1 receptor antagonist did not change significantly after 1 h of mechanical ventilation. IL-10 was below the detection limit (10 pg/ml) in 35 of 39 patients. There were no differences between groups.     

Positive End-expiratory Pressure Improves Respiratory Function in Obese but not in Normal Subjects during Anesthesia and Paralysis

Background: Morbidly obese patients, during anesthesia and paralysis, experience more severe impairment of respiratory mechanics and gas exchange than normal subjects. The authors hypothesized that positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) induces different responses in normal subjects (n = 9; body mass index < 25 kg/m2) versus obese patients (n = 9; body mass index > 40 kg/m2).

Methods: The authors measured lung volumes (helium technique), the elastances of the respiratory system, lung, and chest wall, the pressure-volume curves (occlusion technique and esophageal balloon), and the intraabdominal pressure (intrabladder catheter) at PEEP 0 and 10 cm H2O in paralyzed, anesthetized postoperative patients in the intensive care unit or operating room after abdominal surgery.

Results: At PEEP 0 cm H2O, obese patients had lower lung volume (0.59 +/- 0.17 vs. 2.15 +/- 0.58 l [mean +/- SD], P < 0.01); higher elastances of the respiratory system (26.8 +/- 4.2 vs. 16.4 +/- 3.6 cm H2O/l, P < 0.01), lung (17.4 +/- 4.5 vs. 10.3 +/- 3.2 cm H2O/l, P < 0.01), and chest wall (9.4 +/- 3.0 vs. 6.1 +/- 1.4 cm H2O/l, P < 0.01); and higher intraabdominal pressure (18.8 +/- 7.8 vs. 9.0 +/- 2.4 cm H2O, P < 0.01) than normal subjects. The arterial oxygen tension was significantly lower (110 +/- 30 vs. 218 +/- 47 mmHg, P < 0.01; inspired oxygen fraction = 50%), and the arterial carbon dioxide tension significantly higher (37.8 +/- 6.8 vs. 28.4 +/- 3.1, P < 0.01) in obese patients compared with normal subjects. Increasing PEEP to 10 cm H2O significantly reduced elastances of the respiratory system, lung, and chest wall in obese patients but not in normal subjects. The pressure-volume curves were shifted upward and to the left in obese patients but were unchanged in normal subjects. The oxygenation increased with PEEP in obese patients (from 110 +/- 30 to 130 +/- 28 mmHg, P < 0.01) but was unchanged in normal subjects. The oxygenation changes were significantly correlated with alveolar recruitment (r = 0.81, P < 0.01).     

Effects of the beach chair position, positive end-expiratory pressure, and pneumoperitoneum on respiratory function in morbidly obese patients during anesthesia and paralysis

BACKGROUND: The authors studied the effects of the beach chair (BC) position, 10 cm H2O positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), and pneumoperitoneum on respiratory function in morbidly obese patients undergoing laparoscopic gastric banding. METHODS: The authors studied 20 patients (body mass index 42 +/- 5 kg/m2) during the supine and BC positions, before and after pneumoperitoneum was instituted (13.6 +/- 1.2 mmHg). PEEP was applied during each combination of position and pneumoperitoneum. The authors measured elastance (E,rs) of the respiratory system, end-expiratory lung volume (helium technique), and arterial oxygen tension. Pressure-volume curves were also taken (occlusion technique). Patients were paralyzed during total intravenous anesthesia. Tidal volume (10.5 +/- 1 ml/kg ideal body weight) and respiratory rate (11 +/- 1 breaths/min) were kept constant throughout. RESULTS: In the supine position, respiratory function was abnormal: E,rs was 21.71 +/- 5.26 cm H2O/l, and end-expiratory lung volume was 0.46 +/- 0.1 l. Both the BC position and PEEP improved E,rs (P < 0.01). End-expiratory lung volume almost doubled (0.83 +/- 0.3 and 0.85 +/- 0.3 l, BC and PEEP, respectively; P < 0.01 vs. supine zero end-expiratory pressure), with no evidence of lung recruitment (0.04 +/- 0.1 l in the supine and 0.07 +/- 0.2 in the BC position). PEEP was associated with higher airway pressures than the BC position (22.1 +/- 2.01 vs. 13.8 +/- 1.8 cm H2O; P < 0.01). Pneumoperitoneum further worsened E,rs (31.59 +/- 6.73; P < 0.01) and end-expiratory lung volume (0.35 +/- 0.1 l; P < 0.01). Changes of lung volume correlated with changes of oxygenation (linear regression, R2 = 0.524, P < 0.001) so that during pneumoperitoneum, only the combination of the BC position and PEEP improved oxygenation. CONCLUSIONS: The BC position and PEEP counteracted the major derangements of respiratory function produced by anesthesia and paralysis. During pneumoperitoneum, only the combination of the two maneuvers improved oxygenation.     

Prospective,randomized, controlled evaluation of the preventive effects of positive end-expiratory pressure on patient oxygenation during one-lung ventilation

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: This prospective, randomized, controlled study evaluated the effects on oxygenation by applying a selective and patient-specific value of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) to the dependent lung during one-lung ventilation. METHODS: Fifty patients undergoing thoracic surgery under combined epidural/general anaesthesia were randomly allocated to receive zero PEEP (Group ZEEP, n = 22), or the preventive application of PEEP, optimized on the best thoracopulmonary compliance (Group PEEP, n = 28). Patients' lungs were mechanically ventilated with the same setting during two- and one-lung ventilation (FiO2 = 0.5; VT = 9mL kg(-1), inspiratory :expiratory time = 1 : 1, inspiratory pause = 10%). RESULTS: Lung-chest wall compliance decreased in both groups during one-lung ventilation, but patients of Group PEEP had 10% higher values than patients with no end-expiratory pressure (ZEEP) applied--Group ZEEP (P < 0.05). During closed chest one-lung ventilation, the PaO2 : FiO2 ratio was lower in Group PEEP (232 +/- 88) than in Group ZEEP (339 +/- 97) (P < 0.05); but no further differences were reported throughout the study. No differences were reported between the two groups in the need for 100% oxygen ventilation (10 patients of Group ZEEP (45%) and 14 patients of Group PEEP (50%) (P = 0.78)) or re-inflation of the operated lung during surgery (two patients of Group ZEEP (9%) and three patients of Group PEEP (10%) (P = 0.78)). Postanaesthesia care unit discharge required 48 min (25th-75th percentiles: 32-58 min) in Group PEEP and 45 min (30-57 min) in Group ZEEP (P = 0.60). CONCLUSIONS: The selective application of PEEP to the dependent, non-operated lung increases the lung-chest wall compliance during one-lung ventilation, but does not improve patient oxygenation.     

Positive end-expiratory pressure improves respiratory function in obese but not in normal subjects during anesthesia and paralysis.

BACKGROUND: Morbidly obese patients, during anesthesia and paralysis, experience more severe impairment of respiratory mechanics and gas exchange than normal subjects. The authors hypothesized that positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) induces different responses in normal subjects (n = 9; body mass index < 25 kg/m2) versus obese patients (n = 9; body mass index > 40 kg/m2). METHODS: The authors measured lung volumes (helium technique), the elastances of the respiratory system, lung, and chest wall, the pressure-volume curves (occlusion technique and esophageal balloon), and the intraabdominal pressure (intrabladder catheter) at PEEP 0 and 10 cm H2O in paralyzed, anesthetized postoperative patients in the intensive care unit or operating room after abdominal surgery. RESULTS: At PEEP 0 cm H2O, obese patients had lower lung volume (0.59 +/- 0.17 vs. 2.15 +/- 0.58 l [mean +/- SD], P < 0.01); higher elastances of the respiratory system (26.8 +/- 4.2 vs. 16.4 +/- 3.6 cm H2O/l, P < 0.01), lung (17.4 +/- 4.5 vs. 10.3 +/- 3.2 cm H2O/l, P < 0.01), and chest wall (9.4 +/- 3.0 vs. 6.1 +/- 1.4 cm H2O/l, P < 0.01); and higher intraabdominal pressure (18.8 +/-7.8 vs. 9.0 +/- 2.4 cm H2O, P < 0.01) than normal subjects. The arterial oxygen tension was significantly lower (110 +/- 30 vs. 218 +/- 47 mmHg, P < 0.01; inspired oxygen fraction = 50%), and the arterial carbon dioxide tension significantly higher (37.8 +/- 6.8 vs. 28.4 +/- 3.1, P < 0.01) in obese patients compared with normal subjects. Increasing PEEP to 10 cm H2O significantly reduced elastances of the respiratory system, lung, and chest wall in obese patients but not in normal subjects. The pressure-volume curves were shifted upward and to the left in obese patients but were unchanged in normal subjects. The oxygenation increased with PEEP in obese patients (from 110 +/-30 to 130 +/- 28 mmHg, P < 0.01) but was unchanged in normal subjects. The oxygenation changes were significantly correlated with alveolar recruitment (r = 0.81, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: During anesthesia and paralysis, PEEP improves respiratory function in morbidly obese patients but not in normal subjects.     

Influence of positive end-expiratory pressure on extravascular lung water during the formation of experimental hydrostatic pulmonary oedema

The influence of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on extravascular lung water measured with the double-indicator dilution technique (EVLWi) has been studied during formation of hydrostatic pulmonary oedema in a canine model. The oedema was created by elevating the mean pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) to 30 mmHg (4.0 kPa) by inflation of a left atrial balloon, and a simultaneous intravenous saline infusion of 15 ml.kg-1.h-1. All dogs were ventilated with zero end-expiratory pressure (ZEEP) until the initial EVLWi had increased by 50%. In one group (n = 5) a PEEP of 10 cmH2O (1.0 kPa) was applied and the dogs were studied for a further 4 h and in the other group (n = 5) ZEEP was maintained throughout the study. During the first 2 h after ZEEP/PEEP application EVLWi increased from 13.7 +/- 2.1 to 20.2 +/- 1.2 ml.kg-1 with ZEEP ventilation and from 13.6 +/- 1.2 to 18.6 +/- 1.9 ml.kg-1 with PEEP ventilation. EVLWi remained unchanged during the last 2 h in both groups. The gas exchange improved with PEEP, arterial oxygen tension increased from 30.4 +/- 8.9 kPa to 38.6 +/- 2.5 kPa (P less than 0.01), and the shunt fraction decreased from 6.0 +/- 3.8% to 1.2 +/- 0.8% (P less than 0.001). There were significant differences (P less than 0.01) in both PaO2 and shunt fraction between the ZEEP and PEEP groups throughout the study. In conclusion, positive end-expiratory pressure improves gas exchange but does not protect against increasing extravascular lung water during the creation of hydrostatic pulmonary oedema.     

The effect of prolonged inspiration time and PEEP on compliance and gas exchange in ventilated patients (author's transl)

The effect of prolonged inspiration time and PEEP on compliance, haemodynamics and gas exchange was studied on 15 patients, who were ventilated because of respiratory distress syndrome. The patients were ventilated by the Servoventilator 900 BR connected with a calculation unit. The inspiration time varied from 35 to 70%, the PEEP from 0 to 20 cm H2O. All patients were ventilated with constant tidal volumes (10-15 ml/kg b.w.). The compliance rose from 48 ml/H2O (ZEEP) to 61,5 ml/cm H2O (PEEP + 8 ml H2O). A further increase of PEEP caused a decrease of compliance to 48 ml/cm H2O (PEEP + 20 cm H2O). A prolongation of inspiration time of up to 53% showed an augmentation of compliance from 48 ml/cm H2O to 53 ml/cm H2O. Both modes of assisted ventilation caused an improvement of alveolar ventilation. The simultaneous consideration of various parameters of gas exchange, compliance and haemodynamics guaranteed the optimal mode of ventilation and minimal side effects.     

Effects of recruiting maneuvers in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome ventilated with protective ventilatory strategy

BACKGROUND: A lung-protective ventilatory strategy with low tidal volume (VT) has been proposed for use in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Alveolar derecruitment may occur during the use of a lung-protective ventilatory strategy and may be prevented by recruiting maneuvers. This study examined the hypothesis that the effectiveness of a recruiting maneuver to improve oxygenation in patients with ARDS would be influenced by the elastic properties of the lung and chest wall. METHODS: Twenty-two patients with ARDS were studied during use of the ARDSNet lung-protective ventilatory strategy: VT was set at 6 ml/kg predicted body weight and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and inspiratory oxygen fraction (Fio2) were set to obtain an arterial oxygen saturation of 90-95% and/or an arterial oxygen partial pressure (Pao2) of 60- 80 mmHg (baseline). Measurements of Pao2/Fio2, static volume-pressure curve, recruited volume (vertical shift of the volume-pressure curve), and chest wall and lung elastance (EstW and EstL: esophageal pressure) were obtained on zero end-expiratory pressure, at baseline, and at 2 and 20 min after application of a recruiting maneuver (40 cm H2O of continuous positive airway pressure for 40 s). Cardiac output (transesophageal Doppler) and mean arterial pressure were measured immediately before, during, and immediately after the recruiting maneuver. Patients were classified a priori as responders and nonresponders on the basis of the occurrence or nonoccurrence of a 50% increase in Pao2/Fio2 after the recruiting maneuver. RESULTS: Recruiting maneuvers increased Pao2/Fio2 by 20 +/- 3% in nonresponders (n = 11) and by 175 +/- 23% (n = 11; mean +/- standard deviation) in responders. On zero end-expiratory pressure, EstL (28.4 +/- 2.2 vs. 24.2 +/- 2.9 cm H2O/l) and EstW (10.4 +/- 1.8 vs. 5.6 +/- 0.8 cm H2O/l) were higher in nonresponders than in responders (P < 0.01). Nonresponders had been ventilated for a longer period of time than responders (7 +/- 1 vs. 1 +/- 0.3 days; P < 0.001). Cardiac output and mean arterial pressure decreased by 31 +/- 2 and 19 +/- 3% in nonresponders and by 2 +/- 1 and 2 +/- 1% in responders (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Application of recruiting maneuvers improves oxygenation only in patients with early ARDS who do not have impairment of chest wall mechanics and with a large potential for recruitment, as indicated by low values of EstL.     

Regional Gas Exchange and Cellular Metabolic Activity in Ventilator-induced Lung Injury

Background: Alveolar overdistension and repetitive derecruitment-recruitment contribute to ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). The authors investigated (1) whether inflammatory cell activation due to VILI was assessable by positron emission tomography and (2) whether cell activation due to dynamic overdistension alone was detectable when other manifestations of VILI were not yet evident.

Methods: The authors assessed cellular metabolic activity with [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose and regional gas exchange with [13N]nitrogen. In 12 sheep, the left ("test") lung was overdistended with end-inspiratory pressure of 50 cm H2O for 90 min, while end-expiratory derecruitment of this lung was either promoted with end-expiratory pressure of -10 cm H2O in 6 of these sheep (negative end-expiratory pressure [NEEP] group) or prevented with +10 cm H2O in the other 6 (positive end-expiratory pressure [PEEP] group) to isolate the effect of overdistension. The right ("control") lung was protected from VILI.

Results: Aeration decreased and shunt fraction increased in the test lung of the NEEP group. [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose uptake of this lung was higher than that of the control lung and of the test lung of the PEEP group, and correlated with neutrophil count. When normalized by tissue fraction to account for increased aeration of the test lung in the PEEP group, [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose uptake was elevated also in this group, despite the fact that gas exchange had not yet deteriorated after 90 min of overdistension alone.     

Effects of Recruiting Maneuvers in Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Ventilated with Protective Ventilatory Strategy

Background: A lung-protective ventilatory strategy with low tidal volume (VT) has been proposed for use in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Alveolar derecruitment may occur during the use of a lung-protective ventilatory strategy and may be prevented by recruiting maneuvers. This study examined the hypothesis that the effectiveness of a recruiting maneuver to improve oxygenation in patients with ARDS would be influenced by the elastic properties of the lung and chest wall.

Methods: Twenty-two patients with ARDS were studied during use of the ARDSNet lung-protective ventilatory strategy: VT was set at 6 ml/kg predicted body weight and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and inspiratory oxygen fraction (Fio2) were set to obtain an arterial oxygen saturation of 90-95% and/or an arterial oxygen partial pressure (Pao2) of 60- 80 mmHg (baseline). Measurements of Pao2/Fio2, static volume-pressure curve, recruited volume (vertical shift of the volume-pressure curve), and chest wall and lung elastance (EstW and EstL: esophageal pressure) were obtained on zero end-expiratory pressure, at baseline, and at 2 and 20 min after application of a recruiting maneuver (40 cm H2O of continuous positive airway pressure for 40 s). Cardiac output (transesophageal Doppler) and mean arterial pressure were measured immediately before, during, and immediately after the recruiting maneuver. Patients were classified a priori as responders and nonresponders on the basis of the occurrence or nonoccurrence of a 50% increase in Pao2/Fio2 after the recruiting maneuver.

Results: Recruiting maneuvers increased Pao2/Fio2 by 20 +/- 3% in nonresponders (n = 11) and by 175 +/- 23% (n = 11; mean +/- standard deviation) in responders. On zero end-expiratory pressure, EstL (28.4 +/- 2.2 vs. 24.2 +/- 2.9 cm H2O/l) and EstW (10.4 +/- 1.8 vs. 5.6 +/- 0.8 cm H2O/l) were higher in nonresponders than in responders (P < 0.01). Nonresponders had been ventilated for a longer period of time than responders (7 +/- 1 vs. 1 +/- 0.3 days;P < 0.001). Cardiac output and mean arterial pressure decreased by 31 +/- 2 and 19 +/- 3% in nonresponders and by 2 +/- 1 and 2 +/- 1% in responders (P < 0.01).