A retrospective radiographic analysis of bone loss following placement of TiO2 grit-blasted implants in the posterior maxilla and mandible

PURPOSE: Cortical bone is a determinant of implant esthetics and may contribute to the biomechanical integrity of the implant-supported prosthesis. Historically, approximately 1.0 to 1.5 mm of bone loss has occurred immediately following second-stage surgery and implant loading. Recent consideration of implant design suggests that surface topography may affect crestal bone responses at the implant interface. The aim of this retrospective study of 102 implants in 48 subjects supporting posterior fixed partial dentures was to radiographically define the behavior of crestal bone at TiO2 grit-blasted implants following surgical placement and subsequent loading in the posterior maxilla and mandible. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The crestal bone position relative to the implant reference point (junction of the crestal bevel with the TiO2 grit-blasted surface) was evaluated at implant placement, at abutment placement, and 6 to 36 months following restoration, with an average recall period of 2.3 years. The implant position and dimension were recorded. A single investigator using 7x magnification assessed all radiographs. RESULTS: Crestal bone loss from the time of implant placement up to 36 months following restoration ranged from 0.0 to 2.1 mm. Of the 102 implants, 14 implants showed greater than 1.0 mm of crestal bone loss. They were not clustered at any particular tooth position. Eighty of the implants showed less than 0.5 mm of radiographically measured bone loss. Mean crestal bone loss was 0.36 mm (+/- 0.6 mm). Averages of 0.57 and 0.24 mm loss were shown for 3.5- and 4.0-mm-diameter implants, respectively (P < .051). Bone gain was seen at several 4.0-mm-diameter implants. DISCUSSION: This retrospective evaluation indicates that the radiographically measured bone loss may be expected to be less than 1 mm following placement and loading of TiO2 grit-blasted implants. The close approximation of bone with the implant/abutment interface suggests the attenuation of any microgap-induced bone loss. Additional reasons for crestal bone maintenance may include factors attributed to implant surface roughness and loading along a tapered implant/abutment interface. CONCLUSIONS: Several clinical advantages for maintaining crestal bone at implants supporting posterior prostheses can be identified.     

Influence of a machined collar on crestal bone changes around titanium implants: a histometric study in the canine mandible

Background: It has been shown that peri‐implant crestal bone reactions are influenced by both a rough–smooth implant border in one‐piece, non‐submerged, as well as an interface (microgap [MG] between implant/abutment) in two‐piece butt‐joint, submerged and non‐submerged implants being placed at different levels in relation to the crest of the bone. According to standard surgical procedures, the rough–smooth implant border for implants with a smooth collar should be aligned with the crest of the bone exhibiting a smooth collar adjacent to peri‐implant soft tissues. No data, however, are available for implants exhibiting a sandblasted, large‐grit and acid‐etched (SLA) surface all the way to the top of a non‐submerged implant. Thus, the purpose of this study is to histometrically examine crestal bone changes around machined versus SLA‐surfaced implant collars in a side‐by‐side comparison. Methods: A total of 60 titanium implants (30 machined collars and 30 SLA collars) were randomly placed in edentulous mandibular areas of five foxhounds forming six different subgroups (implant subgroups A to F). The implants in subgroups A to C had a machined collar (control), whereas the implants in subgroups D to F were SLA‐treated all the way to the top (MG level; test). Furthermore, the MGs of the implants were placed at different levels in relation to the crest of the bone: the implants in subgroups A and E were 2 mm above the crest, in subgroups C and D 1 mm above, in subgroup B 3 mm above, and in subgroup F at the bone crest level. For all implants, abutment healing screws were connected the day of surgery. These caps were loosened and immediately retightened monthly. At 6 months, animals were sacrificed and non‐decalcified histology was analyzed by evaluating peri‐implant crestal bone levels. Results: For implants in subgroup A, the estimated mean crestal bone loss (± SD) was ?0.52 ± 0.40 mm; in subgroup B, +0.16 ± 0.40 mm (bone gain); in subgroup C, ?1.28 ± 0.21 mm; in subgroup D, ?0.43 ± 0.43 mm; in subgroup E, ?0.03 ± 0.48 mm; and in subgroup F, ?1.11 ± 0.27 mm. Mean bone loss for subgroup A was significantly greater than for subgroup E (P = 0.034) and bone loss for subgroup C was significantly greater than for subgroup D (P <0.001). Conclusions: Choosing a completely SLA‐surfaced non‐submerged implant can reduce the amount of peri‐implant crestal bone loss and reduce the distance from the MG to the first bone–implant contact around unloaded implants compared to implants with a machined collar. Furthermore, a slightly exposed SLA surface during implant placement does not seem to compromise the overall hard and soft tissue integration and, in some cases, results in coronal bone formation in this canine model.     

Crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A histometric evaluation of unloaded non-submerged and submerged implants in the canine mandible

BACKGROUND: Today, implants are placed using both non-submerged and submerged approaches, and in 1- and 2-piece configurations. Previous work has demonstrated that peri-implant crestal bone reactions differ radiographically under such conditions and are dependent on a rough/smooth implant border in 1-piece implants and on the location of the interface (microgap) between the implant and abutment/restoration in 2-piece configurations. The purpose of this investigation was to examine histometrically crestal bone changes around unloaded non-submerged and submerged 1- and 2-piece titanium implants in a side-by-side comparison. METHODS: A total of 59 titanium implants were randomly placed in edentulous mandibular areas of 5 foxhounds, forming 6 different implant subgroups (types A-F). In general, all implants had a relatively smooth, machined coronal portion as well as a rough, sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) apical portion. Implant types A-C were placed in a non-submerged approach, while types D-F were inserted in a submerged fashion. Type A and B implants were 1-piece implants with the rough/smooth border (r/s) at the alveolar crest (type A) or 1.0 mm below (type B). Type C implants had an abutment placed at the time of surgery with the interface located at the bone crest level. In the submerged group, types D-F, the interface was located either at the bone crest level (type D), 1 mm above (type E), or 1 mm below (type F). Three months after implant placement, abutment connection was performed in the submerged implant groups. At 6 months, all animals were sacrificed. Non-decalcified histology was analyzed by evaluating peri-implant crestal bone levels. RESULTS: For types A and B, mean crestal bone levels were located adjacent (within 0.20 mm) to the rough/smooth border (r/s). For type C implants, the mean distance (+/- standard deviation) between the interface and the crestal bone level was 1.68 mm (+/- 0.19 mm) with an r/s border to first bone-to-implant contact (fBIC) of 0.39 mm (+/- 0.23 mm); for type D, 1.57 mm (+/- 0.22 mm) with an r/s border to fBIC of 0.28 mm (+/- 0.21 mm); for type E, 2.64 mm (+/- 0.24 mm) with an r/s border to fBIC of 0.06 mm (+/- 0.27 mm); and for type F, 1.25 mm (+/- 0.40 mm) with an r/s border to fBIC of 0.89 mm (+/- 0.41 mm). CONCLUSIONS: The location of a rough/smooth border on the surface of non-submerged 1-piece implants placed at the bone crest level or 1 mm below, respectively, determines the level of the fBIC. In all 2-piece implants, however, the location of the interface (microgap), when located at or below the alveolar crest, determines the amount of crestal bone resorption. If the same interface is located 1 mm coronal to the alveolar crest, the fBIC is located at the r/s border. These findings, as evaluated by non-decalcified histology under unloaded conditions, demonstrate that crestal bone changes occur during the early phase of healing after implant placement. Furthermore, these changes are dependent on the surface characteristics of the implant and the presence/absence as well as the location of an interface (microgap). Crestal bone changes were not dependent on the surgical technique (submerged or non-submerged).     

Crestal bone loss around submerged and exposed unloaded dental implants: a radiographic and microbiological descriptive study

The successful maintenance of crestal bone surrounding dental implants is imperative for long-term implant success. Crestal bone loss is reportedly related to stress. However, early perforation and partial exposure of the implant's covering device are a focus for plaque accumulation, which, if left untreated, may result in inflammation. The objective of this study was to evaluate the crestal bone levels adjacent to submerged and exposed unloaded dental implants during the initial healing phase. In addition, the microbiota around exposed implants were studied. Bilateral implants were placed in the mandible of 10 patients. In one quadrant, the implants were covered by the flap. In the other quadrant, the flap was sutured, leaving the cover screws completely exposed. Standardized periapical radiographs were obtained at implant placement and 4 months later. Radiographs were digitalized, aligned, and analyzed with a computer-assisted method. Cultures were obtained from exposed implant sites. All patients showed more crestal bone loss around exposed dental implants compared to submerged implants. Prevotella sp., Streptococcus beta-hemoliticus, and Fusobacterium sp. were the microorganisms identified in most of the sites. The exposure of the implant covering device created foci for bacterial plaque accumulation, which may have facilitated periimplant crestal bone loss. The initial healing phase follow-up may be critical for implant success.     

Platform switching minimises crestal bone loss around dental implants: truth or myth?

The aim was to assess the role of platform switching (PS) in minimising crestal bone loss around dental implants through a systematic review of the currently available clinical evidence. To address the focused question ‘Does PS minimise crestal bone loss compared with non‐platform‐switched (NPS) implants?’, PubMed/Medline and Google Scholar databases were explored from 1986 up to and including December 2013 using the following key words in different combinations: ‘bone loss’, ‘dental implant’, ‘diameter’, ‘mandible’, ‘maxilla’ and ‘platform switching’. Letters to the Editor, unpublished data, historical reviews, case reports and articles published in languages other than English were excluded. Fifteen clinical studies were included. In seven studies, PS and NPS implants were placed in both the maxilla and mandible. In 13 studies, implants were placed at crestal bone levels whereas in one study, implants were placed supracrestally. Three studies reported the bucco‐lingual (or transversal) width of the alveolar ridge which ranged between 7–8 mm. Seven studies reported that implants placed according to the PS concept did not minimise crestal bone loss as compared with NPS implants. 3D‐Implant positioning, width of alveolar ridge and control of micromotion at the implant‐abutment interface are the more critical factors that influence crestal bone levels than PS.     

Influence of flap design on peri-implant interproximal crestal bone loss around single-tooth implants

The anterior maxilla represents a therapeutic challenge for single-tooth replacement with implants. The surgical trauma delivered to soft and hard tissues during implant placement can influence the future esthetic result. The clinician should use surgical techniques that prevent esthetic complications, such as increased crown length or loss of interdental papillae, without compromising osseointegration. This prospective study investigated the interproximal crestal bone loss occurring after placement of single-tooth implants using 2 different flap designs: a widely mobilized flap design that included papillae, and a limited flap design that protected papillae. The interproximal crestal bone loss was of practical importance and statistically significantly less following the use of a limited flap design versus the widely mobilized flap procedure.     

Clinical and radiographic changes around dental implants inserted in different levels in relation to the crestal bone, under different restoration protocols, in the dog model

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to evaluate clinical and radiographic changes that occur around dental implants inserted in different levels in relation to crestal bone under different restoration protocols. METHODS: Thirty-six implants were inserted in the edentulous mandible of six mongrel dogs. Each implant was assigned to an experimental group according to the distance from the top of the implant to the crestal bone: Bone Level (at crestal bone level), Minus 1 (1 mm below crestal bone), or Minus 2 (2 mm below crestal bone). Each hemimandible was submitted to a restoration protocol: conventional (prosthesis was installed 120 days after implant placement, including 30 days with healing cap) or immediate (prosthesis was installed 24 hours after implant placement). Fixed partial prostheses were installed bilaterally in the same day. After 90 days, clinical and radiographic parameters were evaluated. RESULTS: As long as the implants were inserted in more apical positions, the first bone-to-implant contact (fBIC) was positioned more apically (P <0.05). However, the apical positioning of the implants did not influence the ridge loss or the position of the soft tissue margin (PSTM) (P >0.05). In addition, in immediately restored sites, the PSTM was located significantly more coronally than that in conventionally restored sites (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the more apical positioning of the fBIC, the height of the peri-implant soft tissues and ridge was not jeopardized. Moreover, the immediate restoration protocol was beneficial to the maintenance of the PSTM. Further studies are suggested to evaluate the significance of these results in longer healing periods.     

Effect of early exposure on the integration of dental implants: Part 2--Clinical findings at 6 months postloading

Implant exposure during initial healing after placement has been considered important in both implant integration and postloading effects. This study evaluated the effect of early implant exposure on the clinical findings prerestoration and 6 months postrestoration. Forty-eight implants (24 CPTi and 24 Ti-13-13) were placed in maxillary and mandibular posterior sites in six baboons. Implant exposure was evaluated for 24 of the submerged implants at placement and at each weekly visit for 3 weeks after implant placement. The crestal bone level at maxillary posterior sites was measured at 6-month uncovering, and mandibular sites were measured at 3-month uncovering. All sites were again measured 6 months after restoration placement. Periotest readings were recorded at implant uncovering and again 6 months postloading. Arbitrary groupings of the Periotest values were assigned as good = -7 to -1; guarded = 0 to +2; and poor = +3 to +27. At 6 months postloading, there were no statistical differences between CPTi and Ti-13-13 for change in crestal bone height in either arch. The mean change in maxillary crestal bone height varied from a 0.59- to 1.35-mm loss. The differences between the mean exposed and nonexposed changes were not statistically significant The mean change in mandibular crestal bone height varied from a 0.25- to 0.88-mm loss. Changes in crestal bone height for nonexposed sites from 3-month implant uncovering to 6 months postloading were statistically significant at the mesial, buccal, and lingual aspects. The mean change for the nonexposed distal aspect approached significance. The differences between the mean exposed and nonexposed changes were not statistically significant. The overall percentage of maxillary implants in the good category for nonexposed sites decreased by 41% from uncovering to 6 months after loading, while no change occurred for exposed sites; the percentage of implants in the good category was comparable for early exposed and nonexposed sites (57% and 59%, respectively). At 6 months after loading, the percentage of implants in the good category was more favorable for early exposed (88%) than nonexposed sites (50%). A one-stage implant approach should provide similar postloading clinical results as the two-stage surgical approach.     

Crestal bone changes around titanium implants. Part I: A retrospective radiographic evaluation in humans comparing two non-submerged implant designs with different machined collar lengths

BACKGROUND: Experimental studies demonstrated that peri-implant crestal hard and soft tissues are significantly influenced in their apico-coronal position by the rough/smooth implant border as well as the microgap/ interface between implant and abutment/restoration. The aim of this study was to evaluate radiographically the crestal bone level changes around two types of implants, one with a 2.8 mm smooth machined coronal length and the other with 1.8 mm collar. METHODS: In 68 patients, a total of 201 non-submerged titanium implants (101 with a 1.8 mm, 100 with a 2.8 mm long smooth coronal collar) were placed with their rough/smooth implant border at the bone crest level. From the day of surgery up until 3 years after implant placement crestal bone levels were analyzed digitally using standardized radiographs. RESULTS: Bone remodeling was most pronounced during the unloaded, initial healing phase and did not significantly differ between the two types of implants over the entire observation period (P >0.20). Crestal bone loss for implants placed in patients with poor oral hygiene was significantly higher than in patients with adequate or good plaque control (P <0.005). Furthermore, a tendency for additional crestal bone loss was detected in the group of patients who had been diagnosed with aggressive periodontitis prior to implant placement (P = 0.058). In both types of implants, sand-blasted, large grit, acid-etched (SLA) surfaced implants tended to have slightly less crestal bone loss compared to titanium plasma-sprayed (TPS) surfaced implants, but the difference was not significant (P >0.30). CONCLUSION: The implant design with the shorter smooth coronal collar had no additional bone loss and may help to reduce the risk of an exposed metal implant margin in areas of esthetic concern.     

AICRG, Part II: Crestal bone loss associated with the Ankylos implant: loading to 36 months

PROBLEM: The Ankylos endosseous dental implant is a new implant design that will be available in the United States in early 2004. It features an internal tapered abutment connection, a smooth polished collar without threads at the coronal part of the implant body, and a roughened surface with variable threads on the body of the implant fixture. A precise, tapered, conical abutment connection eliminates the microgap often found in 2-stage implant systems. This microgap may allow the accumulation of food debris and bacteria, as well as micromovement between the parts during clinical function, both of which can lead to a localized inflammation and crestal bone loss. PURPOSE: The purpose of this section of the study was to assess any crestal bone loss associated with this new implant. METHOD: The clinical performance of this new implant design was studied under well-controlled clinical conditions. Over 1500 implants were placed and restored. The vertical crestal bone loss was measured "directly" between the time of implant placement and uncovering, using a periodontal probe. Serial dental radiographs were taken between loading, and the 12-, 24-, and 36-month follow-up visits to determine "indirect" crestal bone loss within a specific period. RESULTS: Bone loss varied among the participating centers from less than 0.5 mm to 2.0 mm. The largest amount of bone loss occurred between the time of placement and uncovering. Following loading, the mean bone loss for all implants for a period of 3 years was about 0.2 mm/y. CONCLUSIONS: The extent of the crestal bone loss after loading was minimal for patients regardless of age, gender, prosthetic applications, bone density, and remote or crestal incisions, as well as for smokers or nonsmokers. Bone loss per year is well within the guidelines of 0.2 mm/y proposed by others.     

Loss of crestal bone around dental implants: a retrospective study

The loss of crestal bone associated with dental implants is a significant clinical phenomenon. The occurrence of such bone loss will often compromise long-term prognosis and, if extensive, ultimately lead to failure. Relatively few studies have focused on the reasons for loss of crestal-supporting bone around implants, although numerous explanations for the phenomenon have been proposed. This retrospective investigation examines one potential causative factor for implant-associated crestal bone loss, which has only recently received attention, i.e., location of the implant/transmucosal abutment interface (ITAI) relative to the crestal bone. A retrospective clinical evaluation of 350 individual implants in 255 patients indicates a direct relationship between subgingival placement of the ITAI and loss of crestal supporting bone. In addition, scanning electron microscopic examination of 45 failed implants showed significant plaque accumulation at the ITAI, the transmucosal abutment/prosthesis interface (TAPI), and the interface between the implant smooth collar and subjacent plasma-spray coated surface.     

Rotated palatal flap in immediate implant procedures. Clinical evaluation of 26 consecutive cases

Immediate implant placement after tooth extraction is a successful treatment modality. Primary flap closure is important for satisfactory final results in these procedures. The purpose of this article was to evaluate a surgical approach that would enable predictable primary soft tissue closure over implants placed into fresh extraction sockets. In 24 patients, 26 consecutive implants were placed immediately following extraction of one anterior or premolar maxillary tooth. Primary closure was achieved by a surgical technique based on a rotated palatal flap (RPF), covering the implant. Deproteinized bovine bone was used as grafting material. The apicocoronal distance between the buccal alveolar crestal bone and the coronal aspect of the implant body was measured at time of implant placement (mean 2.6 mm, SD 1.72) and at second stage surgery (mean 0.6 mm, SD 0.70). The difference between both records was calculated. The mean gain in crestal bone was 2.0 mm (SD 1.69, P < 0.001). In 1 patient, where the implant cover screw became exposed early, crestal bone loss was noted. This technique offers a predictable valuable treatment approach to achieve and maintain primary soft tissue coverage and crestal bone regeneration over implants immediately placed within a bony envelope, after extracting maxillary teeth, without the use of barrier membranes.     

Comparison of crestal bone loss and implant stability among the implants placed with conventional procedure and using osteotome technique: a clinical study

To overcome the limitations of implant placement in knife-edge ridges, Summer introduced the osteotome technique in 1994. It has been claimed that using bone condensing to prepare the implant site in soft maxillary bone avoids the risk of heat generation, and implants can be placed precisely with increased primary stability. The purpose of this clinical study was to evaluate the crestal bone loss exhibited by the bone around early nonfunctionally loaded implants placed with conventional implant placement technique and with Summer's osteotome technique and to evaluate whether the bone-compression technique provides better primary stability than the conventional technique. A total of 10 Uniti implants were placed in the maxillary anterior region of 5 patients. One implant site was prepared using the conventional technique with drills (control group A), and second site was prepared using the osteotome technique (experimental group B) and an MIS bone compression kit. Resonance frequency measurements (RFMs) were made on each implant at the time of fixture placement and on the 180th day after implant fixture placement. The peri-implant alveolar bone loss was evaluated radiographically. Differences between the alveolar crest and the implant shoulder in radiographs were obtained immediately after implant insertion and on the 180th day after implant placement. The RFMs demonstrated a significantly higher stability of implants in control group A than in experimental group B on the day of surgery (P = .026). However, no statistically significant difference in stability was found between both groups on 180th day after implant placement (P = .076). A significant difference was found in the crestal bone levels after 180 days of surgery between two groups (P = 0) with less crestal bone loss with group A. Within the limitations of this study we concluded that the osteotome technique is good for the purpose for which it was introduced, that is, for knife-edge ridges, and it should not be considered a substitute for conventional procedures for implant placement.     

愈合期埋植型和非埋植型种植体周围牙槽骨吸收情况观察

目的：观察比较愈合期两段式埋植型和非埋植型种植体周围牙槽骨吸收情况是否存在差异。方法：收集种植义齿修复下颌后牙区牙体缺损患者44例共94颗,其中54颗两段式埋植型Frialit-2种植体和40颗两段式非埋植型ITI种植体,根据种植体植入术后和愈合后数字化全景X线片来进行种植体周围牙槽骨高度的测量。结果：显示愈合期两段式埋植型Frialit-2种植体和非埋植型ITI种植体周围骨吸收值不存在统计学差异（p=0．667〉0．05）。结论：在本实验条件下,愈合期埋植型和非埋植型种植体周围牙槽骨骨吸收改变与种植体的植入方式无关。     

Evaluation of peri-implant bone loss around platform-switched implants

This clinical and radiographic prospective study evaluated bone loss around two-piece implants that were restored according to the platform-switching protocol. One hundred thirty-one implants were consecutively placed in 45 patients following a nonsubmerged surgical protocol. On 75 implants, a healing abutment 1 mm narrower than the implant platform was placed at the time of surgery. On the remaining implants, a healing abutment of the same diameter as the implant was inserted. All implants were positioned at the crestal level. Clinical and radiographic examinations were performed prior to surgery, at the end of surgery, 8 weeks after implant placement, at the time of provisional prosthesis insertion, at the time of definitive prosthesis insertion, and 12 months after loading. The data collected showed that vertical bone loss for the test cases varied between 0.6 mm and 1.2 mm (mean: 0.95 +/- 0.32 mm), while for the control cases, bone loss was between 1.3 mm and 2.1 mm (mean: 1.67 +/- 0.37 mm). These data confirm the important role of the microgap between the implant and abutment in the remodeling of the peri-implant crestal bone. Platform switching seems to reduce peri-implant crestal bone resorption and increase the long-term predictability of implant therapy.     

The causes of early implant bone loss: myth or science?

The success of dental implants is highly dependent on integration between the implant and intraoral hard/soft tissue. Initial breakdown of the implant-tissue interface generally begins at the crestal region in successfully osseointegrated endosteal implants, regardless of surgical approaches (submerged or nonsubmerged). Early crestal bone loss is often observed after the first year of function, followed by minimal bone loss (< or =0.2 mm) annually thereafter. Six plausible etiologic factors are hypothesized, including surgical trauma, occlusal overload, peri-implantitis, microgap, biologic width, and implant crest module. It is the purpose of this article to review and discuss each factor Based upon currently available literature, the reformation of biologic width around dental implants, microgap if placed at or below the bone crest, occlusal overload, and implant crest module may be the most likely causes of early implant bone loss. Furthermore, it is important to note that other contributing factors, such as surgical trauma and penimplantitis, may also play a role in the process of early implant bone loss. Future randomized, well-controlled clinical trials comparing the effect of each plausible factor are needed to clarify the causes of early implant bone loss.     

Spontaneous early exposure of submerged endosseous implants resulting in crestal bone loss: a clinical evaluation between stage I and stage II surgery

Spontaneous early exposure of submerged implants during the osseointegration healing phase may be a harmful factor that results in early crestal bone loss around the implants. The objective of this study was to assess the effect of spontaneous early exposure on crestal bone loss around submerged implants, with special attention given to the relationship between the degree of exposure and the amount of peri-implant bone loss. Crestal bone level relative to the shoulder of the implant was measured at the time of placement and at the time of exposure 4 to 5 months later. During the period between stage I and stage II surgery, implant sites were observed, and each implant site in which spontaneous early exposure was detected was recorded. Perforations were classified according to the degree of implant exposure from Class 0 (no perforation) to Class IV (complete exposure). Measurements from 206 implants in 64 patients produced 85 groups valid for statistical comparison; each of these contained at least 2 lesions of different types. There was a statistically significant difference between bone loss associated with intact mucosa (Class 0) and Class I, Class II, and Class III lesions, and between Class I and II lesions. There were no significant differences between Class I and III and between Class II and III. In Class II and III lesions, there was more bone loss associated with the buccal aspect of the implants. Of the 115 perforated sites, 10 were associated with bone loss exceeding 2 mm, 2 presented 3 to 4 mm bone loss, 1 showed more than 4 mm, and 1 displayed more than 5 mm. In view of the clinical implications that spontaneous early exposure may have on the success of osseointegration, prematurely partially exposed implants should be exposed as soon as possible after the perforation is observed.     

A 10-year prospective study of ITI dental implants placed in the posterior region. I: Clinical and radiographic results

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the long-term fixture success rate, crestal bone loss and peri-implant soft tissue parameters around ITI dental implants placed in the posterior region of partially edentulous patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 192 ITI dental implants were consecutively placed in premolars and molars of 83 partially edentulous patients admitted for treatment at Geneva Dental School. All implants were restored by means of ceramic-to-metal fused fixed partial dentures and single crowns. Patients were followed as part of a prospective longitudinal study focusing on implant success. Surgical, radiographic and clinical variables were collected at the 1-year recall after implant placement and at the most recent clinical evaluation. RESULTS: The mean observation time was 6 years (range 5-10 years). Four implants failed, yielding a 10-year cumulative survival rate of 97.9%. The mean annual crestal bone loss was -0.04+/-0.2 mm. Hollow-cylinder implants displayed more crestal bone loss (-0.13+/-0.24 mm) than hollow-screw implants (-0.02+/-0.19 mm; P=0.032). Clinical parameters such as age, gender, implant length and bone quality did not affect crestal bone levels. Increase in recession depth (P=0.025) and attachment level (P=0.011) were significantly associated with crestal bone loss. CONCLUSIONS: ITI dental implants placed in the posterior jaw demonstrate excellent long-term clinical success. Hollow-cylinder implants seem to display a higher risk for crestal bone loss. Recession depth and attachment levels appear to be good clinical indicators of peri-implant bone loss.     

Retrospective clinical evaluation of tapered screw-vent implants: results after up to eight years of clinical function

Uncertainty about the causes of peri-implant bone loss and difficulties in measuring it often have resulted in omission of bone loss data from published long-term implant studies. This nonrandomized, uncontrolled, retrospective study evaluated the clinical outcomes of treatment with tapered, multithreaded implants with a special emphasis on peri-implant crestal bone status. Chart reviews were conducted of 60 patients who had been treated with 267 implants for the placement of 1 or more missing and/or unsalvageable teeth, and who met general inclusion criteria for dental implant therapy. In all cases, marginal bone changes were calculated from the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) or the implant neck to the crestal bone level with standardized radiographs taken at implant placement (baseline) and during annual follow-up. After a mean followup of 7.5 years, implant survival was 98.5% (263/267) for all implants placed, and implant success was 96.2% (253/263) for all surviving implants. No discernible bone loss was evident in 88% of surviving implants. Crestal bone loss was observed in 25% (15/60) of total study subjects and in 12% (32/263) of all surviving implants: 29 implants exhibited 1 mm of bone loss and 3 implants lost 2 mm of bone. Low-density maxillary jawbone and more extensive bone remodeling, which were required around implants immediately placed into extraction sockets, were the probable causes of observed bone loss in this study. Implants exhibited excellent long-term outcomes with little or no bone loss.     

Peri-implant bone reactions to immediate implants placed at different levels in relation to crestal bone. Part I: a pilot study in dogs

Purpose: The aim of the present study was to evaluate bone remodeling and bone‐to‐implant contact (BIC) after immediate placement at different levels in relation to the crestal bone of Beagle dogs. Materials and methods: The mandibular bilateral second, third and fourth premolars of six Beagle dogs were extracted and six implants were immediately placed in the hemi‐arches of each dog. Randomly, three cylindrical and three tapered implants were inserted crestally (control group) and 2 mm subcrestally (experimental group). Both groups were treated with a minimal mucoperiosteal flap elevation approach. A gap from the buccal cortical wall to the implant was always left. Three dogs were allowed a 4‐week submerged healing period and the other three an 8‐week submerged healing period. The animals were sacrificed and biopsies were obtained. Biopsies were processed for ground sectioning. Histomorphometric analysis was carried out in order to compare buccal and lingual bone height loss, and BIC between the two groups. Results: All implants osseointegrated clinically and histologically. Healing patterns examined microscopically at 4 and 8 weeks for both groups (crestal and subcrestal) yielded similar qualitative bone findings. The distance from the top of the implant collar to the first BIC in the lingual crest (A–Lc) showed a significant difference (P=0.0313): 1.91 ± 0.2 mm in the control group and 1.08 ± 0.2 mm in the experimental group. There was less bone resorption in subcrestal implants than crestal implants. The mean percentage of newly formed BIC was greater with the cylindrical implant design (46.06 ± 4.09%) than with the tapered design (32.64 ± 3.72%). Conclusion: These findings suggest that apical positioning of the top of the implant does not jeopardize bone crest and peri‐implant tissue remodeling. However, less resorption of the Lc may be expected when implants are placed 2 mm subcrestally. To cite this article:
Negri B, Calvo‐Guirado JL, Pardo‐Zamora G, Ramírez‐Fernández MP, Delgado‐Ruíz RA, Muñoz‐Guzón F. Peri‐implant bone reactions to immediate implants placed at different levels in relation to crestal bone. Part I: a pilot study in dogs.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 23 , 2012; 228–235.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2011.02158.x