Race, nutritional status, and survival from breast cancer

The effects of nutritional status on differences in the survival of black and white women with breast cancer were studied in a cohort of 1,960 Georgia women diagnosed during 1975-1979. After data were adjusted for stage of disease, socioeconomic status, and other prognostic factors, poorer survival rates were shown in black women. Within each stage classification, lower levels of serum albumin and hemoglobin and higher relative body weight were more common among blacks and were independently associated with poorer survival. Among women with stage 3 disease, adjustment for these variables substantially reduced the excess mortality rate among blacks, suggesting that racial differences in survival may be partly explained by differences in nutritional status or extent of disease within stage.     

Race, socioeconomic status, and other prognostic factors for survival from prostate cancer

Survival data on prostate cancer patients from 11 Comprehensive Cancer Centers contributing data to the Centralized Cancer Patient Data System were analyzed to examine the contribution of various factors to the probability of survival from prostate carcinoma. Application of a number of exclusion criteria resulted in a series of 2,513 patients (1,032 blacks and 1,481 Caucasians) for whom complete data on variables of interest were available. The stage of disease at diagnosis was a major determinant of survival. The proportion of blacks presenting the disease in advanced stage was substantially higher than that of Caucasians--a difference which was maintained within each socio-economic status (SES) category. Caucasian patients had a better prognosis than blacks for each disease stage. A dose-response relationship between SES and survival prognosis was observed and this relationship persisted for each stage of the disease. Although both race and SES turned out to be significant in regression models in which one or the other was considered, the model including both race and SES showed only SES to be a significant factor. Hence it can be hypothesized that the racial difference in the survival prognosis for prostate cancer is, to a large extent due to the differences in the distribution of SES in the two races.     

Familiality of breast cancer and socioeconomic status in blacks

Familial patterns of the occurrence of breast cancer were studied in a population-based case-control series of black women from the Cancer and Steroid Hormone study. The risks of breast cancer among relatives of breast cancer cases were compared to those of controls who were matched for age and locale. Using the term "proband" to indicate either case or control status, significant predictors of risk to the relatives of probands included case/control status of the proband and the number of years of education completed by the proband. Genetic segregation analysis of the case families using external risks generated from SEER data indicated that the familial aggregation was consistent with Mendelian recessive transmission of a single major gene. The use of internally estimated risks, which are much less stable than the SEER risks, no longer permitted discrimination among the major locus models examined. To avoid possible reporting bias, we also performed segregation analysis on families of probands who had completed at least 12 years of education. The results from this analysis reflected the results from the entire data.     

Race,ethnicity, and socioeconomic status influence the survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in the United States

BACKGROUND:

Racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic disparities in the survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) continue to exist. The authors of this report hypothesized that these differences result from inequities in access to care and in response to therapy.

METHODS:

Patients with HCC (n = 20,920) were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, and patients who underwent liver transplantation for HCC (n = 4735) were identified from the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database. Clinical and pathologic factors were compared after patients were stratified by race and ethnicity.

RESULTS:

The survival of patients with HCC improved over time for all racial, ethnic, and income groups (P < .001). Black and low income individuals had the poorest long‐term survival (P < .001). On multivariate analysis, black race was predictive of the poorest survival (hazard ratio [HR], 1.15; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09‐1.22; P < .001), whereas Asian race was associated with the best survival (HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.83‐0.91; P < .001). After liver transplantation, black patients had the worst graft survival and overall survival (median survival [MS], 30.5 months and 39.7 months, respectively; P < .001), whereas Hispanics had the best survival (MS, 83.4 months and 86.6 months, respectively; P < .001). In a multivariate analysis of transplantation patients, race and ethnicity were associated significantly with outcome.

CONCLUSIONS:

Significant racial and ethnic disparities in the outcome of patients with HCC persist despite the receipt of comparable treatment. The authors concluded that further investigations are warranted to identify the reasons for the stark disparity in outcomes between black patients and Hispanic patients after liver transplantation for HCC. Cancer 2010. © 2010 American Cancer Society.     

Effect of individual and neighborhood socioeconomic status on oral cancer survival

This population-based study investigated the relationship between individual and neighborhood socioeconomic status (SES) and oral cancer mortality. A population-based follow-up study was conducted of 3607 oral cancer patients (predominantly male) who were diagnosed between 2004 and 2005. Each patient was traced to death or for 2 years. Individual SES was defined by enrollee category. Neighborhood SES was defined by income, and numbers of doctors, and neighborhoods were grouped into advantaged and disadvantaged areas. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to compare the death-free survival rate between the different SES groups after adjusting for possible confounding and risk factors. In oral cancer patients aged below 65 years, death rates among those with low SES were highest in disadvantaged neighborhoods. After adjusting for patient characteristics (age, gender, Charlson Comorbidity Index Score, urbanization, and area of residence), tumor extent, treatment modalities (operation, adjuvant therapy), hospital characteristics (ownership, teaching level, caseload), and year of diagnosis, oral cancer patients with low individual SES in disadvantaged neighborhoods conferred a 1.46- to 1.64-fold higher risk for death, compared with patients with high individual SES in advantaged neighborhoods. No statistically significant difference was found in risk of death between different SES groups in patients aged 65 and above. Our findings indicate that oral cancer patients with low individual SES have the highest risk of mortality even under a universal health-care system. Public health strategies and welfare policies must continue to focus on this vulnerable group.     

Improvements in breast cancer survival over time,related to adjuvant treatment and node status

Background

There has been an increase in the use and effectiveness of adjuvant treatment for operable breast cancer and the aim of this study was to examine whether this has resulted in improved survival for all prognostic groups.

Methods

A retrospective study of 1517 patients with invasive breast cancer treated between 1980 and 2002 was carried out. The use of adjuvant treatment was compared between two time periods in patients based on nodal status, and survival was calculated by Kaplan–Meier life table analysis. Independent predictors for recurrence-free survival (RFS) were determined by Cox regression analysis.

Results

The use of adjuvant therapy increased for all prognostic groups. On multivariate analysis the use of radiotherapy and endocrine therapy was positively associated with RFS which was significant in the second time period. Outcome in node positive patients improved: five-year RFS from 59% to 76%, p < 0.01 and breast cancer specific survival (BCSS) from 70% to 83%, p < 0.01. However, there was no survival improvement in the larger group of node negative patients; BCSS 93% versus 95%, p = 0.99. Within the node negative group, patients with tumours ≥ 2 cm had an improved RFS from 80% to 88%, p = 0.02.

Conclusion

The increased use of adjuvant therapy was associated with an improved outcome in node positive patients. For node negative patients with good prognostic features the evidence of benefit was marginal.     

Impact of socioeconomic status on prostate cancer diagnosis,treatment, and prognosis

BACKGROUND:

The objective of the current study was to evaluate the impact of socioeconomic disparities on prostate cancer presentation, treatment, and prognosis in Geneva, Switzerland, in which healthcare costs, medical coverage, and life expectancy are considered to be among the highest in the world.

METHODS:

This population‐based study included all patients diagnosed with invasive prostate cancer among the resident population between 1995 and 2005. Patients were divided into 3 socioeconomic groups according to their last known occupation. Compared were patient and tumor characteristics and treatment patterns between socioeconomic groups. Cox multivariate regression analysis was used to assess and explain socioeconomic inequalities in prostate cancer‐specific mortality.

RESULTS:

Compared with patients of high socioeconomic class, those of low socioeconomic class were more often foreigners, were found less frequently to have screen‐detected cancer, were found to have a more advanced stage of disease at diagnosis, and less often had information regarding disease characteristics and staging. These patients underwent prostatectomy less frequently and were more often managed with watchful waiting. The risk of dying as a result of prostate cancer (hazards ratio [HR]) in patients of a low versus high socioeconomic status was increased 2‐fold (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.5‐2.6). After adjustment for patient and tumor characteristics and treatment, the mortality risk was no longer found to be significantly increased (HR, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.8‐1.6).

CONCLUSIONS:

In the current study, patients of low socioeconomic class were found to be at increased risk of dying as a result of their prostate cancer. This increased mortality is largely attributable to delayed diagnosis, poor diagnostic workup, and less invasive treatments in these individuals. Cancer 2009. © 2009 American Cancer Society.     

Race, socioeconomic status and stage at diagnosis for five common malignancies

Background: African-Americans are more likely than Caucasians to be diagnosed at an advanced stage of colorectal, lung, breast, cervical, and prostate cancers. This study explores if racial differences in stage at diagnosis can be explained by socioeconomic status (SES) differences. Previous studies investigating this association have used aggregate SES indicators from census tract of residence; we used census block-group data, representing a smaller, potentially more homogenous group. Methods: We included all African-American and Caucasian invasive cancers of the colon and rectum, lung and bronchus, female breast, cervix uteri, and prostate that were diagnosed between January 1, 1988 and December 31, 1992 in the Detroit area. Stage of disease at diagnosis was grouped as local or non-local. An SES value was calculated for each case using aggregate 1990 US Census data for education, poverty status, and occupation specific to each case's census block-group. Logistic regression analysis was used to model the probability of non-local stage using SES, race, age group, and sex as covariates. Results: SES was an independent predictor of stage at diagnosis for each cancer site, with cases from the highest SES block-group more likely to present with local stage disease than those from the lowest SES group. Race independently predicted stage only for breast and prostate cancers; African-Americans presented with more advanced stage than Caucasians. Conclusions: Based on census block-group aggregate data, SES is an important predictor of stage at diagnosis, most likely accounting for much of the disparity in stage between African-Americans and Caucasians for colorectal, lung, and cervical cancers. Biological factors may play a role in racial disparities for breast and prostate cancer stage at diagnosis.     

Health disparities in breast cancer: biology meets socioeconomic status

Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women worldwide, accounting for just over 1 million new cases annually. Population-based statistics show that globally, when compared to whites, women of African ancestry (AA) tend to have more aggressive breast cancers that present more frequently as estrogen receptor negative (ERneg) tumors. ERneg tumors fail to respond to current established targeted therapies, whether for treatment or prevention. Subsets of the ERneg phenotype include those that are also negative for the progesterone receptor (PR) and HER2; these are called “triple negative” (TN) breast cancers. TN tumors frequently have pathological characteristics resembling “basal-like” breast cancers. Hence, the latter two terms are often used interchangeably; yet, despite extensive overlap, they are not synonymous. The ERneg, TN, and basal-like phenotypic categories are important because they carry worse prognoses than ER-positive (ERpos) tumors, in addition to lacking obvious molecular targets, such as HER2 and the ER, for known therapies. Furthermore, among premenopausal women the three subsets occur more frequently in women of African descent compared to white women with breast cancer. The contribution of these three subtypes of poor-prognosis tumors to the higher breast cancer mortality in black women is the focus of this review. We will attempt to clarify some of the issues, including risk factors, in terms of their contribution to that component of health disparities that involves biological differences in breast cancer between women of AA and white women.     

Regional variations in cancer survival: Impact of tumour stage,socioeconomic status,comorbidity and type of treatment in Norway

Cancer survival varies by place of residence, but it remains uncertain whether this reflects differences in tumour, patient and treatment characteristics (including tumour stage, indicators of socioeconomic status (SES), comorbidity and information on received surgery and radiotherapy) or possibly regional differences in the quality of delivered health care. National population‐based data from the Cancer Registry of Norway were used to identify cancer patients diagnosed in 2002–2011 (n = 258,675). We investigated survival from any type of cancer (all cancer sites combined), as well as for the six most common cancers. The effect of adjusting for prognostic factors on regional variations in cancer survival was examined by calculating the mean deviation, defined by the mean absolute deviation of the relative excess risks across health services regions. For prostate cancer, the mean deviation across regions was 1.78 when adjusting for age and sex only, but decreased to 1.27 after further adjustment for tumour stage. For breast cancer, the corresponding mean deviations were 1.34 and 1.27. Additional adjustment for other prognostic factors did not materially change the regional variation in any of the other sites. Adjustment for tumour stage explained most of the regional variations in prostate cancer survival, but had little impact for other sites. Unexplained regional variations after adjusting for tumour stage, SES indicators, comorbidity and type of treatment in Norway may be related to regional inequalities in the quality of cancer care.     

Choice of geographic unit influences socioeconomic inequalities in breast cancer survival

Socioeconomic differences in age-standardised crude survival for women diagnosed with breast cancer during 1991-1999 in England were influenced by the population of the geographic area used to assign the deprivation index, but not by the choice of index.     

Race,socioeconomic status,and breast carcinoma in the U.S: what have we learned from clinical studies

BACKGROUND: Whether African-American women have biologically more aggressive breast carcinoma compared with white women and whether race acts as a significant independent prognostic factor for survival have not been determined. Alternatively, race merely may be a surrogate for socioeconomic status (SES). METHODS: A literature review was performed of clinical trials and retrospective studies in the U.S. that compared survival between white women and black women with breast carcinoma after adjustment for known prognostic factors (patient age, disease stage, lymph node status, and estrogen receptor status) to assess the impact of race and SES. RESULTS: Single institutional and clinical studies suggest that, when black patients are treated appropriately and other prognostic variables are controlled, their survival is similar to the survival of white patients. Twelve retrospective studies and 1 analysis of a clinical trial included SES and race as variables for survival. Only three of those studies revealed race as a significant prognostic factor for survival after adjusting for SES. CONCLUSIONS: SES replaces race as a predictor of worse outcome after women are diagnosed with breast carcinoma in many studies. However, black women present with more advanced disease that appear more aggressive biologically, and they present at a younger age compared with white women. Further research should be conducted concerning the precise elements of SES that account for the incidence of breast carcinoma, age at diagnosis, hormone receptor status, and survival to devise better strategies to improve outcome.