Long-term effects of drug-eluting stents versus bare metal stents on patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: outcomes of 3-year clinical follow-up

Background  The long-term safety and efficacy of drug-eluting stents (DES) versus bare metal stents (BMS) are unclear and controversial issues in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The purpose of this study was to compare the long-term outcome of STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI with DES versus BMS implantation.  

Methods  A total of 191 patients with acute STEMI undergoing PCI from Jan. 2005 to Dec. 2007 were enrolled. Patients received DES (n=83) or BMS (n=108) implantation in the infarction related artery according to physician’s discretion. The primary outcome was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), which was defined as a composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI), target vessel revascularization (TVR) and stent thrombosis. The difference of MACE was observed between DES and BMS groups.

Results  The clinical follow-up duration was 3 years ((41.7±16.1) months). MACE occurred in 20 patients during three years follow-up. Logistic regression analysis showed that the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was an independent predictor for MACE in the follow-up period (P=0.0301). There was no significant difference in all-cause mortality (3.61% vs. 7.41%, P=0.2647), the incidence of myocardial infarction (0 vs. 0.93%, P=0.379) and stent thrombosis (1.20% vs. 1.85%, P=0.727) between the DES group and BMS group. The incidence of MACE was significantly lower in the DES group compared to the BMS group (4.82% vs. 14.81%, P=0.0253). The rate of TVR was also lower in the DES group (0 vs. 5.56%, P=0.029). In the DES group, there was no significant difference in the incidence of MACE between sirolimus eluting stents (SES, n=73) and paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES, n=10) subgroups (2.74% vs. 20.00%, P >0.05).

Conclusions  This finding suggested that drug-eluting stents significantly reduced the need for revascularization in patients with acute STEMI, without increasing the incidence of death or myocardial infarction. Use of DES significantly decreased the incidence of MACE compared with BMS during the 3-year follow-up.     

Sirolimus-eluting stents for treatment of drug-eluting versus bare-metal stents restenosis: 42-month clinical outcomes from a Chinese single center

Background  Restenosis of bare-metal stents (BMS) and drug-eluting stents (DES) has been increasingly treated with sirolimus-eluting stents (SES), but the long-term outcomes are unknown.

Methods  In our study, 388 consecutive patients (144 DES restenosis and 244 BMS restenosis) with 400 lesions (147 DES restenosis and 253 BMS restenosis) treated with SES were included. The rates of target lesion revascularization (TLR) and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 42 months were analyzed.

Results  At the mean follow-up of 42 months, the rates of death (3.5% vs. 3.3%, P=1.000) and myocardial infarction (2.8% vs. 1.2%, P=0.431) in the DES group and BMS group were comparable. Compared with the BMS group, ischemia-driven TLR occurred with a higher frequency in the DES group (18.8% vs.10.7%, P=0.024). This translated into an increased rate of MACE in the DES group (22.2% vs. 14.0%, P=0.034). Stent thrombosis occurred with a similar frequency in both groups (2.8% vs. 1.6%, P=0.475). Multivariate analysis showed that DES restenosis (OR=1.907, 95% CI 1.108–3.285, P=0.020) and smoking (OR=2.069; 95% CI 1.188–3.605; P=0.010) were independent predictors of MACE.

Conclusions  Although SES implantation appears to be safe and effective, it was associated with higher TLR recurrence for DES than BMS restenosis.

     

Firebird sirolimus eluting stent versus bare mental stent in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

Background There are few evidences about the value of drug eluting stent in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction （STEMI）. We prospectively designed a randomized controlled trial to compare the safety and efficacy of Firebird sirolimus eluting stent （Firebird stent） and bare metal stent （BMS）. Methods Patients with STEMI enrolled during one year period were randomized to undergo implantation of Firebird stent or BMS, and clinical and angiographic follow-up. The primary endpoint of the present study was in-lesion late lumen loss （LLL） at 6 months, and secondary endpoint includes stent thrombosis and major adverse cardiac events （MACE） at 6 months. Results During one year period, 156 patients were randomized into the Firebird stent group （101 patients with an average age of 57.8 years） or the BMS group （55 patients with 59.7 years on average）. Six-month angiographic follow-up was available in 66.3% and 63.7% of patients assigned to Firebird stent and BMS, respectively. At 6-month follow-up, mortality, target vessel revascularization （TVR） and MACE were 2.0%, 6.9% and 9.9% in the Firebird stent group, while 3.6%, 30.9% and 36.4% in the BMS group （P〈0.05）. Subacute thrombosis occurred in 1 patient in both groups, respectively. The mean LLL was 0.18 mm in the Firebird stent group versus 0.72 mm in the BMS group. Conclusion Implantation of Firebird sirolimus eluting stent for STEMI may greatly reduce TVR and MACE at 6 months with low incidence of acute/subacute stent thrombosis compared with BMS.     

Comparison of drug-eluting stents with bare metal stents implantation for the treatment of acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction: 2-year clinical outcomes from single-center registry

Background  Some larger scale, randomized studies have demonstrated the superiority of drug-eluting stents (DES) over bare metal stents (BMS) for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). This study aimed to investigate the impact of DES, in comparison with BMS, on the 2-year clinical outcomes in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).

Methods  From January 2002 to December 2008, a total of 1301 consecutive STEMI patients treated with coronary stenting in Shenyang Northern Hospital were prospectively registered. Patients received BMS (n=868) or DES (n=435) implantation in the infarction related artery according to physician’s discretion. A propensity score analysis was performed and two well matched subgroups were selected (BMS, n=288; DES, n=288) to evaluate the 2-year clinical outcomes. The primary outcome was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), which was defined as a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), or target vessel revascularization (TVR).

Results  Survival salvage analysis showed that 2-year cumulative hazards were not significantly different between the two groups with respect to TVR (2.8% vs. 3.1%, log-rank P=0.780), stent thrombosis (1.7% vs. 4.2%, log-rank P=0.079) and MACE (8% vs. 10.8%, log-rank P=0.236). Multivariate analysis showed that DES was an independent protective factor of MI (HR: 0.211, 95% CI: 0.049 to 0.908) and stent thrombosis (HR: 0.327, 95% CI: 0.107 to 0.994).

Conclusion  DES was associated with similar 2-year clinical outcomes to those of BMS for the treatment of STEMI in daily practice.

     

药物洗脱支架与金属裸支架置入术后对糖尿病患者远期死亡、心肌梗死和支架血栓发生情况的影响

目的本研究通过比较糖尿病患者置入金属裸支架(bare metal stents,BMS)vs药物洗脱支架(drug eluting stents,DES)后发生死亡、心肌梗死(myocardial infarction,MI)、再次血运重建和支架血栓的情况,以评价糖尿病患者置入DES后的远期安全性和有效性。方法本研究于2003年7月～2005年12月连续入选了834例因冠心病合并糖尿病在首都医科大学附属北京安贞医院心内科行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(percutaneous coronary intervention,PCI)的患者,按置入支架类型将患者分为DES组(n=583)和BMS组(n=251)。主要终点事件为24个月时全因病死率;次要终点事件为24个月时非致死性MI、再次血运重建以及主要不良心血管事件(major adverse cardiac events,MACE)的发生率。结果本研究结果经多因素回归分析显示,DES组明显降低了24个月时死亡[3.2%vs 5.1%,危险比(hazard ratio,HR)0.34,95%可信区间(confidential interval,CI)0.12～0.94,P=0.038]和心性死亡的风险(2.2%vs 4.4%,HR=0.29,95%CI:0.13～0.87,P=0.027),非致死性MI和心性死亡与非致死性MI复合终点发生风险比较差异无统计学意义;明确和可能的支架血栓的发生风险比较差异也没有统计学意义(1.9%vs 2.0%,HR=0.96,95%CI:0.51～2.17,P=0.351)。DES明显降低了再次血运重建的风险(10.5%vs 20.7%,HR=0.24,95%CI:0.11～0.78,P<0.001)和靶血管再次血运重建的风险(8.9%vs 17.1%,HR=0.33,95%CI:0.16～0.87,P<0.001);与BMS组比较DES组的MACE的风险也明显降低,差异有统计学意义(15.8%vs 27.9%,HR=0.19,95%CI:0.09～0.85,P<0.001);其主要与DES组患者的死亡和靶血管再次血运重建的风险降低有关。结论与BMS相比,DES可显著降低糖尿病患者的24个月时死亡、再次血运重建和MACE的风险,而未增加非致死性MI和支架血栓的风险。置入DES后死亡风险的降低原因,主要与DES降低再狭窄后的死亡和MI风险,获得更高的完全血运重建率以及未增加支架血栓的风险相关。     

Comparison of long-term clinical outcome after successful implantation of Firebird sirolimus- and Taxus paclitaxel-eluting stents in Chinese population: analysis of a large single center registry

Background Recent studies have shown that drug eluting stent （DES） implantation improved clinical outcome concerning efficacy compared with bare-metal stent （BMS） implantation, and sirolimus-eluting stent （SES） seemed superior to paclitaxel-eluting stent （PES） in improving the outcomes. Firebird SES is the most widely used SES in China. Long-term comparison of safety and efficacy between Firebird SES and Taxus PES in Chinese popuation is still not available. The aim of this research was to compare the safety and efficacy at 24 months after the successful implantation of Firebird SES and TAXUS PES in Chinese population.Methods From April 2004 to October 2006, 3110 consecutive patients who underwent successful DES （Firebird SES 2274; Taxus PES 836） implantation were prospectively enrolled into this study. All enrolled patients were divided into two groups based on stent type. By outpatient clinic visit and telephone interview, we obtained 24-month clinical outcome including death, myocardial infarction （Ml）, thrombosis, target lesion revascularization （TLR）, target vessel revascularization （TVR）, and major adverse cardiac events （MACE, the composite of death, Ml, and TVR）. We used Cox＇s proportional-hazards models to assess relative risks of all the outcome measures before and after propensity match. Results Unadjusted clinical outcomes indicated that the patients treated with Firebird SES were associated with lower risk of TLR （HR0.38, 95%CI 0.26-0.54）, TVR （HR 0.51,95%CI 0.38-0.68） and MACE （HR 0.53, 95%CI 0.41-0.68）. The results after propensity match were consistent with that before matching, lower risk of TLR （HR 0.33, 95%CI 0.19-0.58）, TVR （HR 0.41, 95%CI 0.26-0.64）, MACE （HR 0.48, 95%CI 0.33-0.68） in Firebird group.Conclusion Compared with Taxus PES, the use of domestic Firebird SES may decrease the risk of TLR, TVR and MACE in daily practice.     

Long-term outcome of patients of over 85 years old with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary stenting: a comparison of bare metal stent and drug eluting stent

Background Patients aged over 85 years have been under-represented in percutaneous coronary intervention （PCI） trials despite an increase in referrals for PCI. The long-term safety and efficacy of percutaneous coronary stenting in patients aged over 85 years with acute coronary syndrome （ACS） remain unclear. Moreover it is unknown whether there are differences between bare metal stent （BMS） and drug eluting stent iDES） in this special population.
Methods A total of 80 patients with ACS aged over 85 years undergoing stenting （BMS group n=21 vs DES group n=59） were retrospectively studied. In-hospital, one year and overall clinical follow-up （12-36 months） of major adverse cardiac events （MACEs） including cardiac deaths, myocardial infarction, target lesion revascutarization （TLR） and target vessel revascularization （TVR） as well as stroke and other major bleeding were compared between the two groups.
Results In the entire cohort, the procedure success rate was 93.8% with TIMI-3 coronary flow post-PCI in 93.8% of the vessels and the procedure related complication was 17.5%. The incidence of in-hospital MACEs in BMS group was higher （14.3% vs 6.8%, P=0.30）. The 1-year incidence of MACEs in DES group was 7.0% while there was no MACE in the BMS group. Clinical follow-up for 12-36 months showed that the overall survival free from MACE was 82.9% and the incidence of MACE in the BMS group was lower （5.3% vs 21.1%, P=0.20）. Multivariate regression analysis showed that the creatinine level （OR：. 1.013; 95%CI： 1.006-1.020; P=0.004） and hypertension （OR; 3.201; 95%CI： 1.000-10.663; P=0.04） are two major factors affecting the long-term MACE.
Conclusions Percutaneous coronary stenting in patients aged over 85 years is safe and provides good short and tona-term efficacy. Patients with renal dvsfunction and hvoertension may have a relatively hiah incidence of MACE.     

药物洗脱支架和金属裸支架治疗冠状动脉小血管病变的疗效

目的 评估雷帕霉素洗脱支架(SES)治疗小管径冠状动脉内粥样硬化病变的疗效. 方法 回顾性分析448例小血管病变SES植入病人和124例裸金属支架(BMS)植入病人的长期疗效.统计并比较住院期间及9个月不良心血管事件发生率(MACE). 结果 SES组治疗复杂病变更多,平均支架长度更长,9个月后再狭窄率明显低于BMS组(1.6% vs 9.9%,P＜0.001);MACE发生率也显著低于BMS组(4.3% vs 13.90%;P＜0.001). 结论 与BMS组相比,在小血管复杂病变中植入SES是有效的,能明显减少术后9个月再狭窄和靶病变血运重建率.     

Clinical outcomes and cost-utility after sirolimus-eluting versus bare metal stent implantation

Background Randomized studies have shown beneficial effects of drug-eluting stent （DES） in reducing the risk of repeated revascularization. Other studies have shown higher proportion of death, myocardial infarction （MI） and increased cost concerning DES. However the long term safety and effectiveness of DES have been questioned recently.Methods To compare long term clinical outcomes, health-related quality of life （HRQOL） and cost-utility after sirolimus-eluting stent （SES） and bare metal stent （BMS） implantation in angina patients in China, 1241 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary revascularization （PCl） with either SES （n=632） or BMS （n=609） were enrolled continuously in this prospective, nonrandomized, multi-center registry study.Results Totally 1570 stents were implanted for 1334 lesions. Follow-up was completed in 1205 （97.1%） patients at 12 months. Rates of MI, all causes of death were similar between the two groups. Significant differences were found at rate of cardiovascular re-hospitalization （136 （22.4%） in BMS group vs. 68 （10.8%） in SES group, P=0.001） and recurrent angina （149 （24.5%） vs. 71 （11.3%）, P=0.001）. Dramatic difference was observed when compared the baseline and 9-month HRQOL scores intra-group （P 〈0.001）. However no significant difference was found inter-group either in baseline or follow-up HRQOL. Compared with SES, the total cost in BMS was significantly lower on discharge （62 546.0 vs. 78 245.0 Yuan, P=0.001）. And follow-up expenditure was remarkably higher in the BMS group than that in the SES group （13 412.0 vs. 8 812.0 Yuan, P=0.0001）.Conclusions There were no significant differences on death, in-stent thrombosis, MI irrespective of stent type. SES was superior to BMS on improvement of life quality. SES was with higher cost-utility compared to BMS.     

Long-term outcomes following drug-eluting stent implantation in unprotected left main bifurcation lesions

Background The safety and efficacy of drug-eluting stents （DES） implantation in unprotected left main （LM） bifurcation lesions has yet to be determined. The aim of the present report was to evaluate the long-term outcome following implantation of DES in unprotected LM bifurcation lesions. Methods We identified 70 consecutive patients treated with DES in unprotected LM bifurcation lesions from April 2003 to January 2005. Of them, 42 patients were treated with sirolimus-eluting stent （SES） and 28 patients were treated with paclitaxel-eluting stent （PES）. Results Stents to the left anterior descending and to the circumflex were implanted in 62 patients. During 1-year follow-up, 3 （4.3%） patients died of cardiac causes. One of them had myocardial infarction and adjudicated as possibly due to stent thrombosis. Angiographic follow-up was available in 80% of patients. The per lesion restenosis rate was 13.4% in the entire cohort, of which 10.7% occurred in lesions treated with SES and 16.1% in those treated with PES （P=0.58）. All restenosis was focal and occurred in the lesions treated with a stent with stent size to post-procedural reference vessel diameter ratio 〈1.0 （17.6% vs 0, P=0.04）. The per patient target lesion revascularization rate at 1 year was 17.1%. One year survival free from major adverse cardiac events was 77.1%. Conclusions Treatment of LM bifurcation lesions using DES is a safe and feasible way with a low one-year mortality. The need for revascularization in 17% of patients demands for improvement.     

Comparison of long-term clinical outcome after successful implantation of FIREBIRD and CYPHER sirolimus-eluting stents in daily clinical practice: analysis of a large single-center registry

Background  Recent data have shown that sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) reduced not only the incidences of restenosis but also of target vessel revascularization (TVR). CYPHER and FIREBIRD stents are both widely used SES in China. However, comparative data concerning differences in long-term safety and efficacy regarding CYPHER and FIREBIRD stents in the Chinese population are still not available.

Methods  From April 2004 to October 2006, 3979 consecutive patients who underwent successful SES (FIREBIRD 2274; CYPHER 1705) implantation were prospectively enrolled into this study. All enrolled patients were divided into two groups based on stent type. Follow-up data, including death, myocardial infarction (MI), thrombosis, target lesion revascularization (TLR), TVR, and major adverse cardiac events (MACE, the composite of death, MI, and TVR) were obtained at 24 months. Cox’s proportional-hazards models were used to assess relative risks of all the outcome measures between the two groups before and after propensity match.

Results  Unadjusted clinical outcomes demonstrated higher TVR (hazard ratio (HR) 1.78, 95%CI 1.26–2.50) and MACE (HR 1.40, 95%CI 1.08–1.82) for patients treated with FIREBIRD SES. After propensity match, the results showed a non-significant trend towards superiority of the CYPHER stent in all the analyzed parameters, however, no significant differences were found for all events at 24 months between FIREBIRD and CYPHER groups, and all thrombosis rates by Academic Research Consortium (ARC) definition were comparable between the two groups.

Conclusions  In this large, real-world population, the use of domestic FIREBIRD SES in China was associated with nearly the same safety and efficacy versus the imported CYPHER SES. FIREBIRD SES can be taken as an alternative for CYPHER SES in daily practice.

     

雷帕霉素洗脱支架对吻术与单支架术对冠状动脉分叉病变疗效的影响

目的比较雷帕霉素洗脱支架对吻技术与单支架技术对真性分叉病变的近、远期疗效的影响。方法 200名分叉病变患者,随机分为对吻支架术和单支架术两组。随访1年,观察两组节段内再狭窄率、死亡率、非致死性心肌梗死率、靶病变再次血运重建率和支架内血栓形成率。结果术后1年,单支架组与对吻支架组相比,再狭窄率、死亡率、心肌梗死发生率、靶病变再次血运重建率、支架内血栓发生率及严重心血管不良事件发生率差异均无统计学意义（P〉0.05）;分支预扩张后,出现夹层的患者分析提示单支架与对吻支架组节段内再狭窄率、靶病变再次血运重建率及严重心血管不良事件发生率差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）,而支架内血栓率、死亡率及心肌梗死率差异无统计学意义（P〉0.05）。结论对于直径较大的分叉病变患者,对吻支架技术的近、远期疗效与单支架术相近。预扩张后分支出现夹层应采用对吻支架术,没有夹层则应采用单支架植入。     

Influence of insulin resistance on long-term outcomes in patients

Background Insulin resistance（IR）is significantly associated with coronary artery disease and cardiovascular events in patients with or without type 2 diabetes mellitus.This study aimed to evaluate the influence of IR on long-term outcomes of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention（PCI）with sirolimus-eluting stent（SES）implantation.Methods A total of 467 consecutive patients undergoing SES-based PCI were divided into lR group（n=104）and non-IR group（n=363）.The patients were followed up for one year.The rate of major adverse cardiac events（MACEs） including death, non-fatal myocardial infarction and recurrent angina pectoris was compared by the log-rank test,and the independent risk factors were identified by the Cox regression analysis.Results MACEs occurred more frequently,and cumulative survival rate was lower in the IR group than in the non-IR group during the follow-up （all P〈0.05）.IR was an independent risk factor for the occurrence of cardiac death and non-fatal myocardial infarction（OR=2176,95% CI=1.35-5.47,P=0.034）.Old age,diabetes,and multi-vessel disease were determinants for recurrent angina pectoris after PCI（P〈0.05）.Subgroup analysis revealed that IR（OR=3.35,95% CI=1.07-13.59,P=0.013）and multi-vessel disease（OR=2.19,95%CI=1.01-5.14,P=0.044）were independent risk predictors for recurrent angina pectoris in patients with diabetes after PCI.Conclusions IR is associated with reduced MACE-free survival and remains an independent predictor for recurrent angina pectoris after PCI with SES implantation.     

Comparison of drug eluting stents with bare metal stents in daily practice for bifurcation lesions in Chinese patients

Background Recently, numerous randomized and controlled trials have demonstrated great advantages of drug eluting stents (DES) with respect to significant reduction of restenosis and recurrence of symptoms and improvement of clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Little is known about the comparative effects between DES and bare metal stents (BMS) for bifurcation angioplasty in the Chinese population. We compared the inpatient and 7-month follow-up outcomes between DES and BMS for the treatment of bifurcation lesions. Methods From April 2004 to October 2005, 291 Chinese patients [85.9% male, mean age (57.8±10.4) years] underwent DES (387 lesions) and/or BMS (297 lesions) implantation for bifurcation lesions. Clinical and angiographic follow-up was performed at 7 months. Results Compared with BMS group, patients in DES group had significantly lower rates of restenosis at main branch (9.5% vs 28.7%, P < 0.001) or side branch (14.5% vs 37.0%, P < 0.001) and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (14.0% vs 26.3%, P = 0.000). The occurrence rate of late in-stent thrombosis did not differ between the two groups in both main (0.8% vs 0, P = 0.224) and side branches (1.4% vs 0, P = 0.198). Target lesion revascularization (TLR) was less frequent in DES group for main branch (8.3% vs 21.3%, P < 0.001) and for side branch (7.6% vs 23.5%, P < 0.001). Multivariate regression analysis revealed that total stent length (OR = 1.029, P = 0.01), postprocedural in-stent minimum lumen diameter (OR = 0.476, P = 0.03) and stent type (OR = 3.988, P = 0.0001) were independent predictors of TLR for main branch. Prior history of coronary intervention (OR = 2.424, P = 0.041), angulated lesion (OR = 2.337, P = 0.033), postdilation (OR = 0.267, P = 0.035) and stent type (DES vs BMS, OR = 5.459, P = 0.000) were independent predictors of TLR for side branch. Conclusion The implantation of DES may be associated with greater reduction of restenosis and TLR than BMS in bifurcations angioplasty.     

Firebird and Cypher sirolimus-eluting stents and bare metal stents in treatment of very long coronary lesions

Background As a kind of sirolimus-eluting stent （SES） made in China, Firebird SES is more effective than bare metal stent （BMS） and not inferior to Cypher SES for short coronary lesions in terms of reduction of restenosis and revascularization. However, Firebird SES does not show any benefits in patients with a very long coronary lesion （VLCL）. The present study was undertaken to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Firebird SES for VLCL by comparison of Cypher SES and BMS. Methods In this prospective, nonrandomized and comparative study, eligible patients with de novo coronary lesion （≥ 30 mm） between January 2005 and June 2006 were allocated into Firebird SES group, Cypher SES group or BMS group. They were subjected to an angiographic follow-up of 6 months and a clinical follow-up of 12 months. The primary endpoints constitute the in-stent and in-segment restenosis rates at 6 months. The secondary endpoint was defined as a major adverse cardiovascular event （MACE） that was a 12-month combined endpoint of all-cause deaths, reinfarction or in-stent thrombosis, and target-lesion revascularization. The 12-month in-stent thrombosis was also evaluated to address the safety of Firebird SES implantation exceptionally. Results A total of 468 patients were assessed for eligibility. Of 113 patients who were finally included according to the prior inclusion and exclusion criteria, 39 （41 lesions） were treated with Firebird SES, 37 （39 lesions） with Cypher SES, and 37 （37 lesions） with BMS. There were no significant differences in the baseline characteristics between the three groups; but there were longer lesions, more frequent use of overlapping stent in the Firebird SES group and the Cypher SES group. Angiographic follow-up showed that the rates of binary stenosis were similar between the Firebird SES group and the Cypher SES group （in-segment： 14.6% vs 12.8%, relative risk （RR）1.14, P=0.81; in-stent： 9.8% vs 10.3%, RR 0.95, P=0.94）, and significantly lower than those in the B     

Coronary stenting does not improve the long-term cardiovascular outcome of patients with mild to moderate renal insufficiency

Background Several studies have shown that coronary stenting reduces the frequency of clinical and angiographic restenosis in patients with mild to moderate renal insufficiency. However, less is known about the long-term benefits of stent use in this population. This study was aimed to determine the impact of coronary stenting on extended （5 years） long-term outcomes of patients with chronic renal insufficiency. Methods The study included 602 consecutive patients who underwent successful percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting. Renal insufficiency was defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate 〈60 rrd.min-1-｜.73 m-2. The major adverse cardiac events were compared for patients with （n=160） and without （n=442） renal insufficiency. Results After the third year of follow-up, nonfatal myocardial infarction and revascularization rates were significantly increased in patients with renal insufficiency compared with those without renal dysfunction （16.9% vs 7.7%, P=0.001; 29.4% vs 15.8%, P 〈0.001）. In patients who had recurrent cardiovascular events, a significantly higher rate of de novo stenosis revascularization was found in patients with renal insufficiency than without renal insufficiency （57.7% vs 22.7%, P 〈0.001）, while there was no significant difference in target lesion revascularization between the groups （51.9% vs 43.6%, P=0.323）. Multivariate analysis demonstrated an independent impact of the presence of renal insufficiency on the major adverse cardiac events （hazard ratio： 1.488, 95% confidence interval： 1.051-2.106, P=0.025） and de novo stenosis （hazard ratio： 5.505, 95% confidence interval： 2.151-14.090, P 〈0.001）. Conclusions The late major adverse cardiac events, after successful coronary stenting, is increased in patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate 〈60 ml.min-1.1.73m-2. This might be associated with increased risk of de novo stenosis in this population. Chin Med J 2009; 122（2）： 158-164     

国产药物洗脱支架在冠心病中的临床应用

目的评价国产药物洗脱支架(Firebird)临床应用的安全性和有效性。方法对110例冠心病患者置入Firebird支架治疗,术后对患者进行随访,观察有无胸痛复发、心电图异常改变、重要心脏不良事件发生等。结果110例患者共置入Firebird支架146枚,手术即刻成功率100%。对患者至少随访3个月,平均8个月,无重要心脏不良事件发生,38例患者6个月后复查造影2例出现再狭窄,再狭窄率5.2%。结论Firebird支架置入即刻成功率高,能有效预防PCI术后再狭窄,治疗冠心病安全、有效。     

Two-year clinical outcome after successful implantation of drug-eluting and bare metal stents in diabetic patients: results from a real-world single center registry

Background Drug-eluting stents （DES） have revolutionized the field of interventional cardiology by dramatically improving clinical and angiographic outcomes. Patients with diabetes mellitus （DM） are associated with an increased risk of adverse clinical outcomes after a percutaneous coronary intervention （PCI）. Available information on the efficacy and safety of DES and bare metal stent （BMS） in diabetic patients remains scarce.
Methods From April 2004 to October 2006, 1565 patients with diabetes, who successfully underwent elective stenting at Fu Wai Hospital in Beijing, China, were enrolled in this study. All enrolled patients were assigned to a drug eluting stent group and a bare metal stent group. We obtained follow-up data： death, myocardial infarction （MI）, thrombus, target lesion revascularization （TLR）, and target vessel revascularization （TVR） at 30 days and 12 and 24 months, as defined by the Academic Research Consortium （ARC）. We calculated and compared all the unadjusted cumulative frequencies of the various adverse events in the two groups. Cox＇s proportional-hazards models adjusted with the propensity score were used to assess the relative risks of all the outcome measures at 24 months.
Results At 24 months, all ARC defined stent thrombosis in the two groups were similar; at 30 days, a more definite thrombosis was found in the BES group （0.08% vs 0.81%, P=0.016）. Patients treated with DES showed a significant lower risk of TLR （3.88% vs 10.89%; hazard ratio （HR） 0.159 （95% CI： 0.151-0.444）, P 〈0.001）, TVR （5.48%vs 11.69%; HR 0.383 （95% CI： 0.232-0.633）, P 〈0.001）, and any revascularization （12.47% vs 18.55%; HR 0.555 （95% CI： 0.370-0.831）, P=0.0004） at 24 months. No significant difference was apparent in terms of all-cause mortality, MI, and all-cause mortality/MI.
Conclusions In contemporary society＇s large, diabetic population, the use of DES is associated with long-term significant reductions in the risks of TLR, TVR, and any revascularization. There is no significant difference in all-cause mortality, MI, and thrombosis between DES and BMS in the patients with diabetes at 24-month follow-up.     

急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死合并急性肾损伤的危险因素及其对预后的影响

目的：探讨急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者并发急性肾损伤(AKI)的危险因素及其对预后影响。方法选择我院2009年7月至2014年6月急性STEMI住院患者302例,根据是否发生AKI将患者分成AKI组和非AKI组。分析AKI发生的相关危险因素,观察住院期间主要不良心血管事件(充血性心力衰竭、恶性心律失常、心源性休克)发生率及死亡率。随访观察出院后1年全因死亡率。结果 STEMI患者并发AKI 75例,发病率为24.83%。多因素Logistic回归分析结果显示,左心室射血分数(LVEF)降低(OR=0.013,95%CI：0.000~0.327)、KillipⅣ级(OR=20.050,95%CI：6.520~61.654)、利尿剂(OR=3.102,95%CI：1.250~7.697)是AKI发生的独立危险因素;与非AKI组患者比较,AKI组患者住院期间主要不良心血管事件发生率及住院死亡率(5.28%vs 13.33%)显著升高,两组间比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组患者随访1年的生存曲线结果显示,AKI组患者全因死亡率明显高于非AKI组,两组间比较差异有统计学意义(P=0.003)。结论 LVEF降低、KillipⅣ级及利尿剂应用是STEMI患者并发AKI的独立危险因素;STEMI患者并发AKI增加住院不良心血管事件发生率及死亡率,降低患者1年生存率。     

Comparison of in-hospital and long-term outcomes between a Cypher stent and a Taxus stent in Chinese diabetic patients with coronary artery disease

Background  The sirolimus and paclitaxel distribution patterns and tissue residence time may be modified in atherosclerotic lesions for patients with diabetes, and the biological mechanisms of action for these agents differ significantly. Previous clinical trials have yielded discrepant results of major adverse cardiac events and restenosis between a sirolimus-eluting stent and a paclitaxel-eluting stent in coronary artery disease. Therefore, this study was conduced to compare in-hospital and long-term clinical outcomes between patients receiving sirolimus-eluting stent (Cypher or Cypher Select stent) and paclitaxel-eluting stent (Taxus Express stent) after percutaneous intervention (PCI) in Chinese patients with diabetes.
Methods  One hundred and sixty-four consecutive diabetic patients underwent PCI in Fuwai Hospital from April 2004 to December 2004. Of them, 101 patients received Cypher or Cypher Select stents (Cypher group, 145 stents) and 63 patients received Taxus Express stents (Taxus group, 129 stents). Repeat coronary angiography was performed at 6-month and clinical outcomes were evaluated at 1- and 3-year follow-up. Stent thrombosis was classified according to Academic Research Consortium (ARC).
Results  The two groups did not differ significantly with respect to cardiac death, recurrent myocardial infarction (re-MI), target vessel revascularization (TVR) and occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE). And the MACE-free cumulative survival at 1- and 3-year follow-up and early, late and very late thrombosis rates were also similar in the two groups (all P>0.05). There was a trend favoring PES over SES with regard to reducing cardiac death (0 vs 2.0%, P=0.524), re-MI (0 vs 2.0%, P=0.524), the composite of the cardiac death and re-MI (0 vs 4.0%, P=0.299) and very late thrombosis (0 vs 3.0%, P=0.295) between 1-year and 3-year follow-up.
Conclusion  The study indicates that PCI with either Cypher or Taxus stents is associated with similar efficacy and safety in the small population of Chinese diabetic patients during long-term follow-up.