Comparison of two cervical cerclages for the prevention of preterm birth and neonatal complications

Objective: To investigate the outcomes of singleton pregnant women with cervical insufficiency undergoing two different cervical cerclages.

Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of women who underwent a history- or ultrasound-indicated cerclage (either Shirodkar or McDonald) at a tertiary referral center from 2002 to 2014. Outcome parameters (delivery age, postoperative cervical length, preterm premature rupture of membranes, preterm delivery rate and neonatal complications) were compared between the two cerclage procedures. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was applied to control for significant variables of preterm birth. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was used to demonstrate delivery age to percentage of term delivery by cerclage type.

Results: Ninety-four cases were initially included. After excluding cases not meeting the study criteria, 60 pregnancies (Shirodkar 36 and McDonald 24) were recruited for analysis. The mean delivery age in the Shirodkar group was more advanced than that in the McDonald group (37.1?±?3.3 versus 34.8?±?4.9 weeks, p?=?0.039). There were significantly fewer deliveries <37 gestational weeks in the Shirodkar group than in the McDonald group (30.6% versus 58.3%, p?=?0.033) but no significant differences in deliveries <28, 32 and 34 gestational weeks. No significant differences were found in neonatal complications except for respiratory distress syndrome (5.6% in Shirodkar versus 29.2% in McDonald, p?=?0.023).

Conclusion: In the setting of history-indicated or ultrasound-indicated cerclage, Shirodkar was superior to McDonald in the prevention of late preterm birth and neonatal respiratory distress syndrome.     

Pregnancy outcomes and factors affecting the clinical effects of cervical cerclage when used for different indications: A retrospective study of 326 cases

ObjectiveTo compare pregnancy outcomes resulting from the use of cervical cerclage for different indications and investigate factors that might influence the clinical effects of cervical cerclage.Materials and methodsThis was a retrospective study of pregnant women who received cervical cerclage in The Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, China. Patients were divided into three groups: a history-indicated group; an ultrasound-indicated group and a physical examination-indicated group. The pregnancy outcomes of the three groups were then compared. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed to assess the independent risk factors.ResultsStatistical differences were evident when the history-indicated group and the ultrasound-indicated group were compared with the physical examination-indicated group for gestational age at delivery [37.3(33.3–38.9), 35.4(28.9–38.4) vs. 26.1 (24.3–28.4) weeks, respectively, P < 0.05], percentage of cases delivered at < 28 weeks of gestation (13.4%, 20.3% vs. 74.3%, respectively, P < 0.05), percentage of cases delivered at < 37 weeks of gestation (42.7%, 54.2% vs. 91.4%, respectively, P < 0.05) and fetal survival rate (88.4%, 81.4% vs. 40.0%, respectively, P < 0.05). The history-indicated group and the ultrasound-indicated group were similar with regards to these outcomes. The independent risk factors affecting the clinical effects of cervical cerclage include age, body mass index (BMI), history of prior preterm birth and second-trimester loss, C-reactive protein (CRP) >5 mg/L and cervical dilation ≥3 cm (P < 0.05).ConclusionPregnancy outcomes were similar when compared between history-indicated and ultrasound-indicated cerclage. Serial cervical surveillance is beneficial for pregnant with a history of cervical insufficiency, and the placement of cervical cerclages in response to ultrasonographically detected shortening of the cervical length is a medically acceptable alternative to the use of history-indicated cerclage.     

Pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) and cerclage success

Objective: This study was performed to evaluate the effect of pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) on the success of cerclage.

Materials and methods: A retrospective cohort study of women who had a history-indicated (HIC) or ultrasound-indicated cerclage (UIC) placed between 1994 and 2011. Based on pre-pregnancy BMI (World Health Organization criteria), three cohorts were defined: normal/overweight (BMI: 20.0–29.9?kg/m²), obese class I/II (BMI: 30.0–39.9?kg/m²) and obese class III (BMI?≥?40.0?kg/m²). The primary outcome was spontaneous preterm birth (sPTB) <35 weeks. The secondary outcomes included but were not limited to gestational age of delivery, sPTB <37, <32 and <28 weeks, preterm premature rupture of membranes and birth weight.

Results: 375 women were included for analysis. Demographics were similar in the three BMI categories, except black race (p?=?0.01). The rates of sPTB <35 weeks were similar between each cohort: 24.3%, 23.0% and 27.7%, respectively (p?=?0.81). BMI was not a predictor of any of the secondary outcomes. A HIC was placed in 47.2% and an UIC was placed in 52.8% women. Both unadjusted and adjusted analysis showed no significant difference in sPTB <35 weeks between BMI categories overall or by cerclage type (HIC or UIC).

Conclusions: Pre-pregnancy BMI is not a significant predictor of sPTB <35 weeks in women with HIC or UIC.     

Does the rate of cervical shortening after cerclage predict preterm birth?

Objective: The objective of this study is to evaluate whether the rate of cervical shortening after cerclage can predict spontaneous preterm birth (SPTB).

Methods: Women who had cervical length (CL) assessments after cerclage placement were identified. The rate of cervical shortening and its relationship with SPTB was established using a generalized linear regression model. Secondary outcomes included relationship between cervical shortening and risk of SPTB in those with a post-cerclage CL?<25?mm versus ≥25?mm at 18–20 weeks; and the rate of cervical shortening in women who delivered preterm compared with those who delivered at term.

Results: One hundred thirty-four patients were included and 30 (22.4%) delivered at <36 weeks. A rate of cervical shortening of 1?mm/week conferred a risk of SPTB of 22%. Among women with cerclage who had a CL?<25?mm at 18–20 weeks, 1?mm/week of cervical shortening was associated with a 59% risk of SPTB. Patients with cerclage who delivered at term had a slower rate of cervical shortening compared to those who delivered preterm (0.62?mm versus 1.40?mm per week, p?=?0.008).

Conclusions: The rate of cervical shortening after cerclage placement is associated with the risk of SPTB. Sonographic surveillance of the rate of cervical shortening may be useful in assessing risk for SPTB in patients with cerclage.     

The retrospective study for effectiveness of cervical cerclage in preventing recurrent preterm birth

ObjectiveThis study aimed to clarify the effectiveness of cervical cerclage in preventing recurrent preterm births.Materials and methodsA retrospective study was conducted using the perinatal registration database of the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology for the Perinatal Center from 2014 to 2016. The efficacies of history-indicated, ultrasound-indicated, and physical examination-indicated cerclage as preventive treatments for women with a history of preterm birth were evaluated by comparing cerclage and non-cerclage cases. Fisher's exact test was performed to evaluate any significant differences in patient backgrounds. Prior to the evaluation, propensity score matching was performed for history-indicated and ultrasound-indicated cerclage patients.ResultsFor this study, 6060 multiparous women with a history of preterm birth were reviewed. After excluding 17 patients with unknown indications for cervical cerclage, 6043 patients were included in the study. History-indicated and ultrasound-indicated cerclage did not reduce the risk of preterm birth in subsequent pregnancies for any of the pregnancy periods (p = 0.413, p = 1.000). In contrast, physical examination-indicated cerclage significantly reduced the risk of subsequent preterm births for all pregnancy periods (p < 0.001).ConclusionSubsequent preterm births were effectively prevented only in physical examination-indicated cerclage cases. For history- or ultrasound-indicated cerclage, statistically significant differences in subsequent preterm births were not evident.     

Pregnancy outcomes following placement of elective,urgent and emergent cerclage

Objective.?To describe pregnancy outcomes following elective (history-indicated), urgent (ultrasound-indicated) or emergent (physical-exam indicated) cerclage placement.

Materials and Methods.?Study design was retrospective chart review. Women with singleton gestation and cervical cerclage were categorised into: elective, urgent and emergent group.

Results.?One hundred and thirty-three women were included; 89 in elective, 26 in urgent and 18 in emergent group. Difference was detected when elective and urgent groups were compared with emergent group for: gestation at delivery (35.9 ± 5.1 vs. 34.2 ± 5.9 vs. 29.3 ± 7.2 weeks, respectively, P < 0.05), delivery beyond 36 weeks, (73.9%, 57.7%vs. 23.5%, respectively, P < 0.05), neonatal death (6.8%, 9.5%vs. 43.8%, respectively, P < 0.05) and Apgar score <7 at 5 min (9.1%, 11.5%vs. 47.1%, respectively, P < 0.05). Difference was also detected between elective vs. urgent and emergent groups for: preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) (19.3%vs. 38.5%vs. 64.7%, respectively, P < 0.05) and chorioamnionitis (1.4%vs. 18.2%vs. 42.9%, respectively, P < 0.05).

Conclusions.?Emergent cerclage group had the poorest obstetric outcomes. The urgent cerclage group reached similar gestational age at delivery as the elective group but is more likely to have PPROM and chorioamnionitis.     

Outcomes after periviable ultrasound-indicated cerclage

Background: Cerclage placed for a sonographically short cervix has been shown to reduce the risk of preterm delivery in women with a history of prior preterm birth. While short cervix is traditionally placed before viability, the threshold gestational age at which viability is achieved continues to decrease, and, as a result, a larger subset of women may be ineligible to receive this potentially beneficial procedure.

Objective: To evaluate the association between obstetric outcomes and perioperative complications after placement of an ultrasound-indicated cerclage at periviability compared to placement in the previable period.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent ultrasound-indicated cerclage evaluated obstetric outcomes and perioperative complications based on gestational age at cerclage placement. Ultrasound-indicated cerclage was considered to have been placed at periviability if placed at 22 to <24 weeks (exposed) and at previability if placed at 16 to <22 weeks gestational age (unexposed). The primary outcome was preterm delivery <36 weeks. Secondary outcomes included mean gestational age at delivery, preterm delivery <32 weeks, <28, and <24 weeks, preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM), chorioamnionitis, and perioperative complications. Adjusted analyses were performed to account for demographic and obstetric factors.

Results: Of the 426 patients included in the analysis, 94 (22%) had cerclage placed between ≥22 weeks to <24 weeks, while 332 (78%) had cerclage placed at <22 weeks. On univariate analysis, women who had a periviable cerclage placed were less likely to have a recurrent preterm delivery <36 weeks compared to women with previable cerclage placement (26.6 versus 38.3%, respectively, p?=?.04). The adjusted model did not demonstrate a significant difference in risk for preterm delivery <36 weeks associated with periviable versus previable cerclage (odds ratio 0.66, 95%CI 0.37–1.17). Secondary outcomes were similar between the previable and periviable groups, including mean gestational age at delivery (35.1 versus 36.2 weeks, respectively, p?=?.08) and preterm delivery before 32-week gestation (20.7 versus 13.8%, respectively, p?=?.17). Intraoperative and postoperative complications were rare and rates were similar between groups.

Conclusions: Obstetric outcomes between patients receiving periviable and previable cerclage are similar. Ultrasound-indicated cerclage placement is associated with a relatively low rate of complications. Given the evidence supporting benefit of cerclage for women with short ultrasound cervical length and prior preterm birth, our findings demonstrate that benefits of placement at ≥22 weeks to <24 weeks may outweigh risks.     

The impact of cerclage in twin pregnancies on preterm birth rate before 32 weeks

Purpose: To evaluate whether cerclage in twins reduces the rate of spontaneous preterm birth <32 weeks when compared to expectant management.

Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of twin pregnancies with the following indications for cerclage from two institutions: history of prior preterm birth, ultrasound-identified short cervix ≤2.5?cm, and cervical dilation ≥1.0?cm. The “cerclage” cohort received a cerclage from a single provider at a single institution from 2003–2016. The “no cerclage” group included all patients with similar indications that were expectantly managed from 2010–2015, at a second institution where cerclages are routinely not performed in twin pregnancies. The primary outcome was the rate of spontaneous preterm birth at <32 weeks. Secondary outcomes were the rates of spontaneous and overall (including medically indicated) preterm births at <32 weeks, Results: In all, 135 women were included in two cohorts: cerclage (n?=?96) or no cerclage (n?=?39). The rates of spontaneous preterm birth <32 weeks were 10.4% (n?=?10) with cerclage versus 28.2% (n?=?11) without cerclage (OR 0.23, CI 0.08–0.70, p?=?.017). After adjusting for cerclage indication, clinical history, age, chorionicity, insurance type, race, BMI, in-vitro fertilization, and multifetal reduction, there remained a significant reduction in the cerclage group of spontaneous preterm birth <32 weeks (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.24, CI 0.06–0.90, p?=?.035), spontaneous preterm birth <36 weeks (aOR 0.34, CI 0.04–0.81, p?=?.013) as well as in overall preterm birth <32 weeks (aOR 0.31, CI 0.1–0.86, p?=?.018), and overall preterm birth <36 weeks (aOR 0.37, CI 0.10–0.84, p?=?.030). When stratified by short cervix or cervical dilation in the cerclage versus no cerclage groups, there was a significant decrease in spontaneous preterm birth <32 weeks in the cerclage group with cervical dilation (11.1 versus 41.2%, p?=?.01) but not in the cerclage group with short cervix only, even for cervical length <1.5?cm. Pregnancy latency was 91 days in the cerclage group versus 57 days in the no cerclage group (p?=?.001), with a median gestational age at delivery of 35 versus 32 weeks (p?=?.002). There was no increase in chorioamnionitis in the cerclage group. Furthermore, there was a significant increase in birth weight (median 2278 versus 1665?g, p?p?=?.001).

Conclusions: Cerclage in twin pregnancies significantly decreased the rate of spontaneous preterm birth <32 weeks compared to expectant management. However, when stratified by cerclage indication, this decrease in primary outcome only remained significant in the group with cervical dilation.     

Fetal fibronectin,cervical length,and the risk of preterm birth in patients with an ultrasound or physical exam indicated cervical cerclage

Objective: The objective of this study is to estimate the risk of preterm birth in patients with an ultrasound or physical exam indicated cervical cerclage based on the results of fetal fibronectin (fFN) and cervical length (CL) screening.

Methods: Retrospective cohort of patients with a singleton pregnancy and an ultrasound or physical exam indicated Shirodkar cerclage placed by one maternal–fetal medicine practice from November 2005 to January 2015. Patients routinely underwent serial CL and fFN testing from 22 to 32 weeks. Based on ROC curve analysis, a short CL was defined as?≤15?mm. All fFN and CL results included are from after the cerclage placement.

Results: One hundred and four patients were included. Seventy eight (75%) patients had an ultrasound-indicated cerclage and 26 (25%) patients had a physical exam-indicated cerclage. A positive fFN was associate with preterm birth?<32 weeks (15.6% versus 4.2%, p?=?0.043), <35 weeks (37.5% versus 11.1%, p?=?0.002), <37 weeks (65.6% versus 20.8%, p?<?0.001), and earlier gestational ages at delivery (35.2?±?3.9 versus 37.4?±?2.9, p?=?0.001). A short CL was also associated with preterm birth?<35 weeks (50.0% versus 11.9%, p?<?0.01), preterm birth?<37 weeks (55.0% versus 29.8%, p?=?0.033), and earlier gestational ages at delivery (34.8?±?4.1 versus 37.2?±?3.0, p?=?0.004). The risk of preterm birth?<32, <35, and?<37 weeks increased significantly with the number of abnormal markers.

Conclusion: In patients with an ultrasound or physical exam indicated cerclage, a positive fFN and a short CL are both associated with preterm birth. The risk of preterm birth increases with the number of abnormal biomarkers.     

Ultrasound-indicated cerclage: Shirodkar vs. McDonald

Objective: To compare the efficacy of Shirodkar to McDonald cerclage in patients with singleton pregnancies undergoing an ultrasound-indicated cerclage. Methods: Historical cohort of all patients with singleton pregnancies undergoing cerclage for the indication of a short cervix on ultrasound (ultrasound indicated) at one institution in 2005–2010. We compared outcomes based on cerclage type, Shirodkar or McDonald. Outcome measures were gestational age (GA) at delivery, delivery ≥35 weeks, ≥32 weeks, and PPROM. Multivariable regression analysis was performed to control for significant variables. Results: Seventy-four patients with singleton pregnancies underwent an ultrasound-indicated cerclage in the study period (47 Shirodkar, 27 McDonald). Shirodkar was associated with later GA at delivery (mean GA at delivery 36.98 +/? 3.39 vs. 33.34 +/? 6.37 weeks, p = 0.006), a higher likelihood of delivering ≥35 weeks (83 vs. 55.6%, p = 0.011) and ≥32 weeks (91.5 vs. 59.3%, p = 0.001), and a lower likelihood of preterm premature rupture of membrane (PPROM) (13.0 vs. 46.2%, p = 0.002). On adjusted analysis controlling for differing baseline characteristics, Shirodkar remained significantly associated with an increased incidence of delivery ≥32 weeks (odds ratio [OR]: 5.180, 95% CI: 1.024–26.205). Conclusion: Compared to the McDonald technique, the Shirodkar technique was more effective in prolonging pregnancy in patients with singleton pregnancies undergoing ultrasound-indicated cerclage. A prospective trial is needed to compare these two techniques.     

Relationship between interpregnancy interval and cervical length in high-risk women

Objective: Our objective was to evaluate the relationship between the interpregnancy interval (IPI) and next-pregnancy mid-trimester cervical length (CL) in women at high risk for recurrent spontaneous preterm birth (SPTB).

Methods: Retrospective review identified high-risk women, defined as a prior SPTB <36 weeks, who began scheduled serial transvaginal sonographic CL screening at 16–18 weeks gestation between December 2008 and November 2010. All CL assessment ended by 22^6/7 weeks, and weekly 17-α hydroxyprogesterone caproate, 250?mg IM, was recommended to all patients. Details of the prior and current pregnancy were collected, and regression models were used to evaluate the relationship between IPI and CL shortening.

Results: One hundred and eight women with singleton gestations and a qualifying SPTB underwent CL screening. The mean (SD) birth gestational age (GA) of the last pregnancy was 25 (10) weeks, the median IPI was 613 (range 49–6038) days, and the mean (SD) delivery GA in the current pregnancy was 36 (5.3) weeks. Linear regression found no significant relationship between the IPI and the GA of the current birth (p?=?0.98). There was a weak significant relationship between IPI and shortest CL (p?=?0.04). However, after controlling for the GA of the prior pregnancy, this relationship was non-significant (p?=?0.13).

Conclusions: IPI does not predict next birth outcome or next-pregnancy mid-trimester CL in high-risk women managed with progesterone and ultrasound-indicated cerclage.     

Prior cerclage: to repeat or not to repeat? That is the question

Our objective was to compare obstetrical outcomes of women with a prior cerclage for nontraditional indications who in the subsequent pregnancy either received a history-indicated cerclage or were followed by transvaginal ultrasound (TVU) cervical length (CL). All women with a history- or ultrasound- indicated cerclage in a prior pregnancy and who had a subsequent pregnancy were retrospectively identified from a preexisting database of women at risk for preterm birth between 1995 and 2002. Only women who reached >or= 12 weeks of gestation were included for analysis. Women with a diagnosis other than classic cervical insufficiency were managed in the subsequent pregnancy either by history-indicated cerclage or by serial TVU CL. The primary outcome was spontaneous preterm birth < 35 weeks. We identified 56 women with a prior cerclage for nontraditional indications. In the subsequent pregnancy, 28 women were followed with TVU and 28 matched controls received history-indicated cerclage. The groups were matched for demographics and risk factors. There were no differences between the two groups in the incidence of preterm labor < 35 weeks (21% versus 11%; P = 0.5), preterm premature rupture membranes < 35 weeks (7% versus 11%; P = 1.0), spontaneous preterm birth < 35 weeks (11% versus 11%; P = 1.0), or the gestational age at delivery (36.3 +/- 6.6 versus 36.5 +/- 5.6; P = 0.5). We concluded that in women with prior cerclage for indications other than classic cervical insufficiency, repeat history-indicated cerclage may not improve outcome compared with management with TVU CL follow-up.     

Re-evaluation of the subgroup analysis from the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists randomized controlled trial of cervical cerclage

History-indicated cervical cerclage is offered to patients who are at risk of spontaneous preterm birth (SPTB), though the indications are controversial. A common practice of offering cerclage after three prior SPTBs or midtrimester losses (MTLs) is based on findings of the subgroup analysis of the 1993 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) randomized trial of cervical cerclage. The subgroup analysis was performed by repeating the primary analysis within individual subgroups, which can lead to erroneous conclusions. We repeated the subgroup analysis by evaluating the interaction between the characteristic of interest and treatment allocation in a regression model. The interaction between cerclage and any prior PTB as a binary variable was non-significant. Among subjects delivering at <37 weeks, there was a significant interaction between cerclage and prior PTBs as a continuous variable or ≥ 3 (p-values 0.04 and 0.03, respectively). There were no significant interactions between cerclage and the aforementioned outcomes among women who delivered at <33 weeks, though this may have been secondary to a smaller number of SPTB in this range. Our findings lend credence to the current recommendations regarding the use of history-indicated cerclage, though they remain subject to the inherent limitations of subgroup analyses.     

Contemporary use of cervical cerclage

Although it was devised over 50 years ago, only recently controlled randomized trials have evaluated the efficacy of cervical cerclage. Cerclage was originally devised for women with both prior preterm birth (PTB) and cervical changes in the current pregnancy. Evidence suggests that transvaginal cerclage probably prevents second trimester loss/PTB in women with >or=3 PTB/second trimester loss (history-indicated cerclage best placed at 12 to 14 wk); and in women with a prior PTB 16 to 36 weeks and transvaginal ultrasound cervical length<25 mm in the current pregnancy (ultrasound-indicated cerclage at 14 to 23 6/7 wk).     

Vaginal fetal fibronectin as a predictor of spontaneous preterm delivery in the patient with cervical cerclage

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the validity of vaginal fetal fibronectin as a screening test for spontaneous preterm birth in patients with cervical cerclage. STUDY DESIGN: A historic cohort of 117 patients who underwent cervical cerclage placement between 1996 and 2002 were identified. All patients were followed up in a maternal-fetal medicine faculty practice in a university setting. Serial fetal fibronectin samples of vaginal secretions were collected every 2 to 3 weeks, starting at 22 weeks of gestation and continuing until 32 weeks or delivery, whichever came first. RESULTS: There were 81 singleton, 23 twin, 12 triplet, and 1 quadruplet pregnancies. There were 61 ultrasound-indicated, 47 prophylactic, and 9 emergency cerclages that were placed. Most cerclages were of the modified Shirodkar type (95%) with a median gestational age at cerclage placement of 16.6 weeks. Overall, 33.3% of gestations were delivered spontaneously before 37 weeks of gestation; 17.1% of gestations were delivered spontaneously before 34 weeks. For deliveries within 2 weeks and 3 weeks of a single fetal fibronectin assessment, the test had a sensitivity of 50% and 48.3%, a specificity of 90% and 91.1%, a positive predictive value of 16.3% and 28.6%, and a negative predictive value of 97.9% and 96%, respectively. Subgroup analysis by number of fetuses (singleton, twin, and higher order multiple gestations) revealed similar values. For delivery before 34 weeks of gestation, fetal fibronectin had a sensitivity of 50%, a specificity of 78.4%, a positive predictive value of 33.3%, and a negative predictive value of 88%. CONCLUSION: This study is the first to evaluate the use of vaginal fetal fibronectin assessments to screen for preterm birth in patients who had undergone cervical cerclage procedures. We conclude that this test has similar validity to predict spontaneous preterm delivery in these high-risk pregnancies, as in previously published cohorts.     

Suture type and ultrasound-indicated cerclage efficacy

Objective: To assess whether type of suture material affects cerclage efficacy for preterm birth (PTB) prevention. Methods: Secondary analysis of a multicenter trial of ultrasound-indicated cerclage for short cervical length (CL), in which women with prior spontaneous PTB at 16–33 6/7 weeks, a singleton gestation and CL < 25 mm between 16–22 6/7 weeks, were randomized to McDonald cerclage or no cerclage. Outcomes of women who underwent cerclage were analyzed by type of suture material, comparing polyester braided thread (Mersilene? or Ethibond?) to Mersilene tape?. Primary outcome was PTB < 35 weeks. Results: 138 women underwent McDonald cerclage: 84 (61%) received polyester braided thread and 46 (33%) Mersilene tape?. Eight (6%) received monofilament suture and were excluded from analysis. Rates of PTB < 35 weeks were similar, 35% for polyester braided thread vs 24% for Mersilene tape? (p = .24). Birth gestational age was also similar among the 2 groups (p = .18). Conclusion: Type of suture material may not affect ultrasound-indicated cerclage efficacy in high-risk women with short CL, but further study is needed. Polyester braided thread (Mersilene? or Ethibond?) and polyester braided Mersilene tape? seem to have similar efficacy.     

Preterm delivery in triplet pregnancies

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to assess the rate of spontaneous preterm birth (SPTB) versus indicated preterm birth (IPTB) in triplet pregnancies and determine factors associated with these outcomes.

Materials and methods: This is a review of triplet pregnancies delivering at our institution from 2003 to 2015. Patients delivering prior to 24 weeks gestational age (GA) were excluded. SPTB included cases of preterm labor or preterm premature rupture of membranes <37 weeks. IPTB was defined as deliveries <37 weeks for maternal or fetal complications.

Results: Of 80 triplet pregnancies, 18 (22.5%) were not complicated by SPTB or IPTB and reached their scheduled delivery date. In the remaining 62 pregnancies, IPTB occurred in 31 patients and SPTB in 31 patients. Parity was the only significant factor associated with reaching a scheduled delivery, with 56.3% of parous women reaching a scheduled delivery versus 14.1% of nulliparous women (p?=?0.001). There were no significant differences in maternal age, parity, chorionicity, or use of ART between the SPTB and ITPB groups.

Conclusions: While the majority of our triplet patients delivered preterm, IPTB occurred as frequently as SPTB in our population. Parous women were significantly less likely to experience SPTB or to require preterm delivery for maternal or fetal indications.     

Obstetrical outcomes of emergency compared with elective cervical cerclage

Objective: To study obstetric outcomes of emergency cerclage compared with elective cerclage.

Study design: Retrospective cohort study of pregnancy outcomes of patients who underwent cervical cerclage, performed according to ACOG guidelines, between January 2006 and December 2014. Patients who underwent emergency cerclage, due to cervical shortening or cervical dilation (emergency cerclage group) were compared with patients who underwent history-indicated cerclage (elective cerclage group). Emergency cerclage was not performed in patients with uterine contractions, vaginal bleeding, or signs of chorioamnionitis. Procedure-related complications were defined as rupture of membranes or chorioamnionitis occurring after cerclage placement and before 24 weeks of gestation.

Results: Overall, 154 patients with elective cerclage and 47 patients with emergency cerclage were included. Mean gestational age at cerclage operation was 13.1?±?1 and 20.2?±?3 weeks, respectively. There were no differences between the emergency cerclage group and the elective cerclage group regarding mean gestational age at delivery (36.1?±?3 versus 35.6?±?3, respectively, p?=?0.7), rate of deliveries beyond 34 weeks of gestation (81.81% versus 78.72%, respectively, p?=?0.67), rate of deliveries beyond 37 weeks of gestation (64.93% versus 59.57%, respectively, p?=?0.6), cesarean deliveries (33.11% versus 39.13%, p?=?0.48, respectively), or birthweight (2848 versus 2862 grams, respectively, p?=?0.9). Regarding procedure-related complications, there were no differences between the elective and the emergency cerclage groups in the rate of chorioamnionitis (1.29% versus 4.34%, respectively, p?=?0.22), or ruptured membranes (1.29% versus 4.34%, respectively, p?=?0.22).

Conclusion: Pregnancy outcomes of emergency cerclage are comparable with those of elective cerclage.     

Risk of intrapartum cervical lacerations in women with cerclage

Objective: The aim of our study was to estimate whether the placement of cerclage in pregnancy to prevent preterm birth (PTB) is associated with higher incidence of intrapartum cervical lacerations. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on singleton pregnancies with risk factors for PTB. The study group consisted of women with either a history- or ultrasound-indicated cerclage placed between 12 and 24 weeks of gestation, while the control group consisted of women with similar risk factors for PTB but who did not receive a cerclage. Primary outcome was the incidence of intrapartum cervical lacerations. A sample size calculation was performed on the basis of the results of previous studies on cervical lacerations. Results: We identified 134 women who had a cerclage placed in pregnancy. They were compared with 236 controls with no cerclage. Cases and controls had similar risk factors for cervical lacerations. Cervical lacerations occurred with similar frequencies in the cerclage and no-cerclage group (2.2 vs 1.3%, p = 0.78). There was no significant difference between the two groups for the risk of cervical lacerations (RR 1.76, 95% CI: 0.36–8.60). Conclusions: Cerclage placement during pregnancy is not associated with an increased risk of intrapartum cervical lacerations.