Binaural cochlear implantation after bilateral temporal bone fractures

Abstract

In this clinical note we discuss the indications, feasibility, and outcomes of binaural simultaneous cochlear implantation (CI) following bilateral transverse temporal bone (TB) fractures. A 41-year-old male, totally deaf after a bilateral TB fracture, underwent an audiological, electrophysiological, and imaging investigation in order to assess the integrity of the VIIIth cranial nerves. Five months later he received a simultaneous bilateral CI. Speech perception tests were conducted at different time points. A significant advantage by dichotic listening was observed since the beginning of the habilitation program. The patient achieved a 100% word and sentences recognition in quiet at 12 months. His listening skills in noisy conditions were improved by the use of two implants. A CI in TB fractures is feasible if the VIII nerve is intact and the cochlea is spared by the fracture rim. The early timing of the procedure probably contributed to its success by preventing cochlear fibrosis and ossification.

Sumario

En esta nota clínica discutimos las indicaciones, la factibilidad, y los resultados de la implantación coclear (CI) bilateral simultánea posterior a fracturas transversas bilaterales del hueso temporal (TB). Un varón de 41 años de edad, totalmente sordo después de una fractura bilateral del TB, fue sometido a una investigación audiológica, electrofisiológica y por imágenes, para evaluar la integridad de ambos octavos nervios craneales. Cinco meses después, el sujeto recibido IC bilaterales simultáneos. Se realizaron pruebas de percepción de lenguaje en diferentes momentos. Se observó una ventaja significativa en la audición dicótica desde el inicio del programa de habilitación. El paciente logró un 100% de reconocimiento de palabras y frases en silencio a los 12 meses. Sus habilidades para escuchar mejoraron con el uso de dos implantes. Una IC en fracturas del TB es factible si el VIII par está intacto y la cóclea no está involucrada en el trazo de la fractura. La oportuna realización del procedimiento probablemente contribuyó al éxito al prevenir la fibrosis coclear y la osificación.     

Bilateral cochlear implantation in a patient with long-term deafness

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: 1) To report the case of a 70-year-old patient with a history of auditory deprivation for 80% of his life and who received bilateral cochlear implants and 2) to discuss different aspects of the case, including duration of auditory deprivation, the decision for bilateral implantation, age at implantation, and the use of this treatment modality for tinnitus. CASE REPORT: A two-stages bilateral cochlear implantation was performed in a 70-year-old patient with long-term deafness without operative or post-operative problems with excellent functional result. DISCUSSION: Various studies have reported that in patients with long-term auditory deprivation, the results of cochlear implants are delayed and sometimes unsatisfactory when compared to patients with more recent post-lingual deafness. However they did not contraindicate the surgery. The positive results with the first implant (both for the tinnitus and the hearing loss) motivated the patient and medical team to proceed to bilateral implantation. CONCLUSION: Patients with longstanding auditory deprivation can achieve good functional results even though at a slower rate. The use of bilateral cochlear implants accelerates and optimizes the final outcome.     

Histopathology of temporal bone fractures: Implications for cochlear implantation

Temporal bone fractures often cause loss of audiovestibular function. Those patients with bilateral profound sensorineural hearing losses secondary to temporal bone fractures become candidates for cochlear implantation. The authors present the histopathology of five temporal bone fractures in three patients, evaluating specifically the traumatic effects on the neural elements of the inner ear. Transverse fractures of the temporal bone result in severe loss of hair cells, ganglion cells, and other supporting cells in the inner ear. Occasionally labyrinthitis ossificans may occur as a consequence of trauma or infection. While longitudinal fractures do not violate the otic capsule, these same neural elements may be damaged by concussion.     

Bilateral cochlear implantation in bilateral Langerhans cell histiocytosis

Abstract

Background

Langerhans’ cell histiocytosis (LCH) is a rare proliferative disorder that can have otologic manifestations in up to 30% of patients. Treatment of local and systemic disease may include medical, surgical, and radiation therapies. Involvement of the temporal bone can lead to conductive and, rarely, sensorineural hearing loss. Post-labyrinthectomy cochlear implantation can be an effective treatment option for sensorineural hearing loss in the setting of persistent LCH.

Methods

A retrospective case review at a tertiary academic medical center. Hearing in Noise Test (HINT) performed before and after bilateral cochlear implantation was examined.

Results

Following bilateral partial labyrinthectomy, post-operative testing showed a HINT in quiet of 17%. Left-sided cochlear implant followed by immunosuppressive therapy for persistent disease showed marked improvement with post-operative HINT in a quiet room of 80% and 63% at 1 and 2 years. Fifty-five months after left implantation, and 10 months after right cochlear implantation, binaural post-operative HINT in quiet was 81%.

Conclusion

Surgical excision of LCH lesion remains a mainstay of treatment for temporal bone involvement. Bilateral cochlear implant with adjuvant immunosuppression in our patient demonstrated both immediate and delayed improvement in auditory function after staged cochlear implantation in the setting of persistent disease.     

汉语语后聋患者双侧人工耳蜗植入一例

人工耳蜗主要是帮助通过助听器得不到有效补偿，不能满足听觉和言语交流目的的重度听力障碍人群。对于健听者，双耳聆听较单耳聆听时具有声音信号更清晰饱满，提高噪声环境时的交流能力和对声源定位等优点。然而目前绝大多数人工耳蜗是单侧植入，且非植入耳使用助听器效果很差。因此如何进一步提高言语交流能力，特别是在噪声环境时及对声源定位等是亟待解决的问题。     

Bilateral cochlear implantation

Cochlear implantation (CI) is the standard of care for the treatment of children and adults with bilateral severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss. Because the ultimate and continuous goal of CI teams is to improve patient performance, a potential method is bilateral CI. The potential benefits of bilateral CI include binaural summation, squelch, equivalent head shadow for each ear, improved hearing in noise, sound localization ability, and spatial release from masking. The potential disadvantages include additional or prolonged surgical procedure, unproven cost/benefit profile, and the elimination of the ability to use future technologies and/or medical therapies in the implanted ear.     

Cochlear implantation in posttraumatic bilateral temporal bone fracture

Temporal bone (TB) fractures can cause loss of audiovestibular function. Four cases of profound hearing impairment following bilateral TB fracture are presented in this report. All patients received a cochlear implant. All 4 patients became regular users of their implants. None of the patients experienced facial nerve stimulation. Implant-aided audiometry demonstrated a hearing threshold of 28 dB HL. The performance in speech understanding was comparable to standard postlingual adult patients implanted. We believe that cochlear implantation in patients suffering from profound sensorineural hearing losses secondary to TB fractures can be an effective tool for rehabilitation.     

Bilateral cochlear implantation in children

AIMS: to determine the benefit of bilateral cochlear implantation in a child on speech and language development. METHOD: This child got her first implant, a Nucleus 24-system, on the right side at the age of 2.5 years. The left side was implanted at the age of 4.4 years with a Nucleus 24Contour-system. On the right side she's now wearing an Esprit 24-speechprocessor (SPR). On the left side she has a Sprint-SPR. M. goes to a mainstream school and receives Speech and Language therapy in a Speech and Hearing Rehab Centre. The etiology of her deafness was hyperbilirubinemia. Auditory capacity and speech recognition tests were performed for both ears separately and together. RESULTS: Aided thresholds give a PTA of 28 dBA with the first implant, 22 dBA with the second implant and with both implants we get a PTA of 23 dBA. Results for speech identification and recognition demonstrated an increased performance when both implants are used together. Speech and language development was equivalent to the mean of age 4.5. At the time of testing M. was 4.8 years. At this time the speech and language development show no delays with normal hearing children. CONCLUSIONS: bilateral cochlear implantation in children may have additional value for their speech and language development. Also, implantation may be considered when auditory neuropathy is likely.     

Bilateral cochlear implantation in children with Noonan syndrome

Noonan syndrome is a mostly autosomal dominant inherited disorder, which can be accompanied by hearing disorders or deafness, coagulation disorders, combined heart defects and developmental disorders. We are reporting on two children with an established Noonan syndrome with a severe bilateral hearing loss of respectively 95 and 100 dB and proper findings in the CT/MRI of the petrous bone. After complete otologic and radiologic diagnostics, both children underwent bilateral cochlear implantation successfully. According to the authors’ knowledge, this is the first time that cochlear implant therapy is discussed in patients with Noonan syndrome.     

Histopathology of the temporal bone following multichannel cochlear implantation.

The temporal bone histopathologic findings of a patient having received a Nucleus 22-channel cochlear implant (Cochlear Corp, Englewood, Colo) following bilateral transverse otic capsule fractures is presented. The case was complicated by perilymph fistulas, labyrinthitis, meningitis, and death due to drowning. The left cochlea revealed complete labyrinthitis ossificans; the implanted right cochlea demonstrated new bone formation in the basal turn of the scala tympani, degeneration of the organ of Corti, but normal ganglion cell counts. Results of psychophysical and speech perception 4 months after implantation are presented.     

Successful cochlear implantation in a patient with MNGIE syndrome

Abstract A 28-year-old woman with mitochondrial neurogastrointestinal encephalomyopathy (MNGIE syndrome) undergoing evaluation for multichannel cochlear implantation is described. The case history, diagnosis of mitochondrial disease, and assessment of the benefits of cochlear implantation are documented. The hearing level with cochlear implant and speech recognition were improved significantly for this patient. MNGIE syndrome is a rare congenital disorder of mitochondrial DNA (mt-DNA). It is crucial for the otolaryngologist to have awareness of MNGIE syndrome and other mitochondrial encephalomyopathies when patients present with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). Cochlear implantation can be recommended to patients with MNGIE syndrome and satisfactory results can be achieved.     

Successful cochlear implantation in a patient with superficial siderosis

OBJECTIVE: To define the presentation and outcome of cochlear implantation in a patient with profound sensorineural hearing loss due to superficial siderosis. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case review. RESULTS: Postimplantation speech reception threshold was 34 dB, and hearing in noise testing sentences were 71% demonstrating a successful outcome. These results have been maintained for 5 years after implantation. CONCLUSION: Cochlear implantation is a potentially successful rehabilitation option for certain patients with profound sensorineural hearing loss due to superficial siderosis.     

Benefits of bilateral cochlear implantation: a review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Although unilateral cochlear implantation generally provides good speech understanding under quiet conditions, cochlear implantation patients frequently report difficulty understanding speech when exposed to background noise and with sound localization. Since these two listening functions require binaural stimulation for normal individuals and hearing aid recipients, it is not surprising that there is growing interest in binaural implants. This update reviews the basics of binaural listening and the advantages and disadvantages of binaural cochlear implantation. RECENT FINDINGS: Although the psychoacoustic literature has long demonstrated the benefits of binaural hearing, only recently have studies shown improvement in speech intelligibility with bilateral implants compared with unilateral implants. Of the three known binaural mechanisms, the head shadow effect provides greater benefit than binaural squelch or summation. In addition, binaural cochlear implants improve the ability to localize sound. SUMMARY: Bilateral implantation provides multiple benefits to patients with severe to profound hearing loss. Research is currently directed at improving speech intelligibility by utilizing evolving technologies in speech-processing strategies.