Phase II study of gemcitabine plus cisplatin in metastatic breast cancer

Our objectives were to assess the efficacy and toxicity of gemcitabine plus cisplatin as first-line therapy in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Patients with stage IV MBC and no prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease were treated with gemcitabine 1200 mg/m on days 1 and 8, and cisplatin 75 mg/m on day 1 every 21 days. Up to 6 cycles were given. A total of 46 patients with a median age of 49 years (range 24-77) and Karnofsky performance status of 80 or above were enrolled. In total, 238 cycles were administered. Of the 42 patients evaluable for response, seven (17%) achieved a complete response and 27 (64%) a partial response, for an overall response rate of 81% [95% confidence interval (CI) 69-93%]. Median time to progression was 14.9 months (95% CI 0-30.2 months). Median duration of response was 24.2 months (95% CI 11.2-37.3 months). The median survival was 27.9 months (95% CI 23.1-32.7 months), and the 1- and 2-year survival probabilities were 71.4 and 61.4%, respectively. All patients were evaluable for toxicity, and grade 3/4 WHO toxicities included neutropenia (41.3%), anemia (8.7%), thrombocytopenia (8.7%), alopecia (26.1%) and nausea/vomiting (32.6%). We conclude that gemcitabine plus cisplatin is a highly effective and safe first-line treatment for patients with MBC. The time to progression of 14.9 months compares favorably with other standard treatments (anthracyclines, taxanes). A randomized study is required to further investigate the role of this combination as first-line treatment for MBC.     

Phase II study of gemcitabine in combination with vinorelbine versus gemcitabine followed by vinorelbine for metastatic breast cancer

Background No clear data are available concerning the superiority of combination chemotherapy to sequential therapy using agents beyond 1st or 2nd line chemotherapy for treating patients with metastatic breast cancer. Methods Patients were randomized to receive a combination of gemcitabine and vinorelbine or gemcitabine until disease progression followed by vinorelbine monotherapy. Quality of life was assessed using EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaires. Results Forty-two patients were randomized to the combination arm and 40 were randomized to the sequential arm. Baseline characteristics were well balanced between the arms. The median number of chemotherapy cycles was 4 (range, 1–23) for the combination arm and 6 (range, 1–25) for the sequential arm. Patients receiving combination therapy had a higher composite response rate (26.8% vs. 12.5%; P = 0.106) but a shorter median time to treatment failure (3.6 vs. 4.4 months, P = 0.252) as compared to patients receiving sequential monotherapy. Median overall survival for the combination and sequential arms was 10.6 months and 8.9 months, respectively (P = 0.436). Toxicities were manageable and similar in both arms. Quality of life measurements in global health, role, and social function were superior in the combination arm (P < 0.05). Conclusions Combined gemcitabine and vinorelbine therapy appears comparable to sequential monotherapy for heavily pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer as demonstrated by improved quality of life outcomes with similar therapeutic efficacies and incidences of adverse events.     

Phase II study of gemcitabine as first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced or metastatic breast cancer

In this phase II study, the efficacy and tolerability of gemcitabine were studied in 42 patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer who had received up to one prior chemotherapy regimen in an adjuvant setting. Ten patients had received adjuvant chemotherapy. Twenty-eight patients (67%) had visceral disease spread at entry. Gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2) was administered weekly on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle. The mean number of completed cycles was 3.9 and the mean dose delivered was 942.2 mg/m2. Ninety-seven percent of injections were administered as assigned. No complete responses were observed, but there were six partial responses and 24 patients with stable disease lasting 2-9 months. The overall response rate was 14.3% (95% CI 5.4-28.5%). The median survival for all patients was 15.2 months. Maximum WHO grade 3 and 4 toxicities were observed in five patients for nausea and vomiting, one patient for diarrhea, one patient for pain, seven patients for alanine transaminase, and eight patients for segmented neutrophils. There were no grade 3 and 4 toxicities for alopecia. These data confirm modest single-agent gemcitabine activity in advanced or metastatic breast cancer. Gemcitabine's favorable toxicity profile makes it an ideal candidate for combination chemotherapy.     

Phase II trial of gemcitabine as prolonged infusion in metastatic breast cancer.

Gemcitabine is an active agent in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. The phosphorylation of gemcitabine into the active gemcitabine triphosphate (dFdCTP) is catalyzed by deoxycytidine kinase. This enzyme is saturated at plasma concentrations achieved after an infusion over 30 min. Therefore accumulation of higher intracellular dFdCTP concentrations, which may result in an enhanced antineoplastic activity, cannot be achieved by higher dosage, but only by prolonged infusion time. In a previous phase I trial the maximum tolerated dose of gemcitabine given as a 6 h i.v. infusion was 250 mg/m2. The objective of this phase II trial was to determine the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine as prolonged infusion in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Twenty patients [median age 50.4 years, range 35-63 years; performance status EORTC 0 (17 patients), 1 (two patients), 2 (one patient)] with metastatic breast cancer were treated with 250 mg/m2 gemcitabine as infusion over 6 h on days 1, 8 and 15 q3 weeks for up to six courses (median 3.9 courses). Treatment was first line for four patients, second line for five patients and third line or higher for 11 patients. Metastatic sites were liver in 14 patients, bone in 12 patients, lung in eight patients and lymph nodes in nine patients. Nine patients presented two metastatic sites, three patients three and five patients four. All patients were evaluable for response and toxicity. One patient (5%) achieved a complete remission (CR) and four patients (20%) a partial remission (PR) (one patient with CR of visceral metastases but stable bone metastases), for an overall response rate of 25% (five of 20). In addition, six patients (30%) had stable disease and nine (45%) failed to respond to the treatment. Time to progression ranged from 2 to 23 months with a median of 6.3 months. Hematologic toxicity was mild with leukopenia grade 3 in only three patients (15%) and no grade 3 thrombocytopenia. Moderate elevations of liver enzymes (three patients grade 3), nausea and vomiting (two patients grade 2), and mild alopecia were observed, but only one patient had to be withdrawn due to toxicity. In conclusion gemcitabine as prolonged infusion is an effective treatment in metastatic breast cancer. Toxicity, especially myelosuppression, is surprisingly mild. Therefore, gemcitabine seems to be ideal for combination therapies.     

A randomized phase II of gemcitabine and sorafenib versus sorafenib alone in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer

Purpose Patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer have limited therapeutic options. The role of the Ras-Raf-MAPK pathway and of vascular endothelial growth factor in pancreatic carcinogenesis provided the rational to evaluate the efficacy of sorafenib with or without gemcitabine in a randomized phase II study. Methods Patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer were randomized to sorafenib alone (arm A) or sorafenib with gemcitabine (arm B). Results Arm A was closed to accrual at interim analysis due to the lack of objective response. Median PFS and OS were 2.3 and 4.3 months respectively. There was one partial response among the 37 patients in arm B. Median PFS and OS were 2.9 and 6.5 months respectively. There were more grade 3 and 4 toxicities in arm B with the most common being neutropenia (17%), thrombocytopenia (8%), alkaline phosphatase elevation (14%), venous thromboembolism (8%), diarrhea, hypokalemia and ALT elevation (5%) each. Several associations were noted between single nucleotide polymorphisms in ribonucleotide reductase, Cox-2, vascular endothelial growth factor and survival in patients treated with gemcitabine and sorafenib. Conclusions Neither sorafenib alone or sorafenib in combination with gemcitabine manifested promising activity in metastatic pancreatic cancer.     

A phase II study of epirubicin in breast cancer.

We evaluated the efficacy of epirubicin in a phase II trial in breast cancer, as well as its cardiac toxicity. The study was carried out on 40 female patients with advanced, metastatic, or recurrent breast cancer. The patients were grouped into two groups: group I received 30 mg/m2 epirubicin weekly, and group II 90 mg/m2 epirubicin every 3 weeks. Cardiac monitoring was by ECG, roentgenography, echocardiography and endomyocardial biopsies. Clinical results were 35.3% overall response in group I, and 50% overall response in group II. No untoward cardiac toxicities were encountered. We conclude that epirubicin is an effective agent in breast cancer with relatively little cardiac toxicity.     

Phase II study of deoxyspergualin in metastatic breast cancer

We conducted a phase II trial of the novel immunomodulatory/cytotoxic agent 15-deoxyspergualin in patients with metastatic breast cancer who had failed treatment with front-line chemotherapy. Thirty-eight courses of treatment were administered to fourteen patients enrolled in this trial, 25 at a dose of 1800 mg/m²/ d (dose level 0) and 13 at a dose of 2150 mg/m²/d (dose level +1) administered by continuous intravenous infusion for 5 days. Treatment was well tolerated with neuromuscular side-effects (myalgias, paresthesias) and granulocytopenia (nadir granulocyte count of 0.50–0.99 x 10⁹/1) in two and three courses, respectively, as the only grade III toxicities. The neuromuscular toxicity of deoxyspergualin is probably related to the occurrence of hypomagnesemia. No partial or complete responses were observed in this study. One patient achieved a minor response but had progressive disease 65 weeks after enrollment. The response was observed coincident with an increase in T4/T8 ratio in the peripheral blood. The median time to progression for the entire cohort was eight weeks (range, 4–65 weeks). There was no clinical evidence of immunosuppression and no decrease in total peripheral blood lymphocyte counts or helper T-cells was observed. At the doses and schedule employed in this trial, deoxyspergualin does not appear to have significant activity against metastatic breast cancer resistant to front-line chemotherapy. The correlation between hypomagnesemia and neuromuscular toxicity of deoxyspergualin is an intriguing, previously unknown observation and requires further investigation.     

A phase II study of dose-dense docetaxel and mitoxantrone in the treatment of patients with high-risk metastatic breast cancer

Doxetaxel (DCT) and mitoxantrone (MX) are highly active and potentially synergistic agents in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer (MBC). This pilot study evaluates the combination of dose-dense DCT and MX in patients with MBC to determine the efficacy and toxicity of this therapy. Thirty-six patients (56.1+/-1.7 years) were studied. The patients received DCT (35 mg/m(2) q1w) and MX (6 mg/m(2) q2w) for 6 weeks of an 8-week interval. Patients with tumor response or stable disease (SD) continued the treatment for a maximum of two additional periods. Hematologic and non-hematologic parameters were determined using the WHO common toxicity score. During this study 14 patients (40%) experienced partial response, 14 (40%) SD. In 20% of the cases the disease progressed on therapy. The treatment with DCT and MX was well tolerated. Seventeen patients (47%) experienced grade 3 leukopenia. Other hematologic and non-hematologic side effects did not exceed grade 2. One patient died during therapy because of a pulmonary embolism, which was unlikely related to active agents. Dose-dense DCT and MX combines both clinical activity and convenience for the patient. Therefore, we conclude that this regimen is a promising therapy in MBC, which warrants confirmation by large-scale clinical trials.     

Oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil for heavily pretreated metastatic breast cancer: a preliminary phase II study

Oxaliplatin shows in vitro and in vivo synergism with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). In this study we evaluate the clinical efficacy of oxaliplatin and 5-FU in heavily pretreated metastatic breast cancer. Eligible patients had to be pretreated with both anthracyclines and taxanes. Pretreatment with capecitabine was recommended but not mandatory. Chemotherapy: oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2/2 h day 1, folinic acid 400 mg/m2/2 h day 1, 5-FU 400 mg/m2 i.v. push day 1, 5-FU 2400 mg/m2 continuous infusion/48 h day 1, q2w. Fourteen patients were included: one male and 13 females; age: median 53 years (38-62); ECOG 0: three patients, 1: nine patients, 2: two patients; all patients were pretreated with anthracyclines and taxanes, capecitabine: nine patients, vinorelbine: six patients, trastuzumab: four patients, hormonal therapy: 12 patients; lines of prior palliative chemotherapy: 0: one patient, 1: three patients, 2: one patient, 3: three patients, 4: four patients, 5: two patients. Results: median number of cycles: 8 (range 1-17). Toxicity (14 patients evaluable; no. of patients with Common Toxicity Criteria grade 3/4): asthenia: 2/-, paraesthesia 3/-, leuko/neutropenia: 1/2, no neutropenic fever, other (alopecia, skin): 2/-. Response (12 patients evaluable, all with bidimensionally measurable disease): complete remission: no patients, partial remission: four patients (33%, all confirmed), stable disease: five patients, progressive disease: three patients. We conclude that despite the small number of patients, the combination of 5-FU and oxaliplatin shows promising efficacy in this heavily pretreated population.     

Phase II study of ionidamine in patients with metastatic breast cancer

Summary The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group conducted a phase II study of lonidamine in patients with metastatic breast cancer. The drug was given orally to a maximum daily dose of 340 mg/m². Forty-two patients were entered on study. One partial response was observed; there were no life-threatening toxicities. The results of this study are compared to two similar phase II trials.Other participating institutions include: Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA (CA-18281); Medical College of Ohio, Toledo, OH; Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical Center, Chicago, IL (CA-25988), Evanston Hospital (CCOP), Evanston, IL.     

Prolonged infusion of gemcitabine in stage IV breast cancer: a phase I study

Gemcitabine is an effective agent in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. The phosphorylation of gemcitabine into the active gemcitabine triphosphate (dFdCTP) is catalyzed by deoxycytidine kinase. This enzyme is saturated at plasma concentrations achieved after an infusion over 30 min. Therefore accumulation of higher intracellular dFdCTP concentrations, which may result in an enhanced antineoplastic activity, cannot be achieved by higher dosage, but only by prolonged infusion time. The objectives of this phase I trial were to determine the dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of gemcitabine given as a 6 h i.v. infusion. Patients with metastatic breast cancer were treated with gemcitabine as a 6 h infusion on days 1, 8 and 15 every 4 weeks. The starting dose was 200 mg/m2 with an interindividual escalation in 50 mg/m2 increments. Sixteen patients received 196 doses through three dose levels. All patients were assessable for toxicity, 13 assessable for response. The MTD was 250 mg/m2. DLT was observed at 300 mg/m2 consisting of a reversible elevation of transaminases WHO grade 3 in two patients and cutaneous toxicity grade 3 in one patient. Most common non-hematologic toxicities were mild to moderate and rapidly reversible elevation of liver enzymes in all patients, nausea and vomiting (four patients grade 2, five patients grade 3), and mild alopecia. Hematologic toxicity was mild with neutropenia WHO grade 3 and 4 in only one patient each, and no grade 3 thrombocytopenia. One patient achieved a complete remission and another patient a partial response, for an overall response rate of 15% (two of 13). In addition, seven patients (54%) had stable disease and four (31%) failed to respond to the treatment. We conclude gemcitabine 250 mg/m2 days 1, 8 and 15 every 4 weeks can be safely administered as 6 h infusion. Toxicity, especially myelosuppression, is surprisingly mild. Based on this result a phase II study with 250 mg/m2 administered over 6 h was initiated to determine the efficacy.     

A phase II study of epirubicin, vinorelbine and cisplatin in advanced breast cancer

Our objective was to evaluate the activity and safety of the combination of cisplatin, epirubicin and vinorelbine (CEV) in advanced breast cancer patients. Patients with advanced breast cancer, locally advanced or metastatic, received epirubicin 75 mg/m2 and cisplatin 50 mg/m2 on day 1, and vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 on day 8. Cycles were repeated every 3 weeks. A total of 35 patients were treated. Thirty-one patients were evaluated for response. One hundred and fifty-five cycles of chemotherapy were administered overall. The objective response rate (ORR) was 84%, including complete response in 13% of patients. All stage III patients achieved a downstaging, with a pathological complete response in two out of 10 patients. Patients with stage IV disease obtained objective response in 67% of cases. Toxicity was mild to moderate. The most common grade 3-4 adverse event was febrile neutropenia, which occurred in 17% of patients. We conclude that CEV combination represents an effective treatment for patients with previously untreated advanced breast cancer, allowing an important ORR. Moreover this regimen appears to be well tolerated.     

A phase II study of the halichondrin B analog eribulin mesylate in gemcitabine refractory advanced pancreatic cancer

Background Eribulin mesylate is a halichondrin B analog that inhibits microtubule dynamics. Pre-clinical studies have suggested anti-tumor activity in pancreatic cancer. This phase II study of eribulin in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer previously treated with gemcitabine was conducted by the Princess Margaret Hospital Phase II consortium. Patients and Methods Eligibility criteria included locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma and previous treatment with gemcitabine. The study was a single arm phase II trial using a Simon 2-stage design. The primary endpoint was response rate, secondary endpoints included time to progression and overall survival. Results Fifteen patients were enrolled, 14 received treatment, and 12 were evaluable for response. The median age was 61, and the majority of patients were ECOG performance status 1. Grade 3 or greater adverse events included neutropenia (29%), fatigue (14%), peripheral neuropathy (7%) and thrombosis (7%). There were no complete or partial responses and therefore the study was closed after the first stage. The best response was stable disease in 5/12 (42%) of patients. Of these five patients, three had stable disease for 9 months or greater. Median time to progression was 1.4 months, and median overall survival was 6.1 months. Conclusion Eribulin was well tolerated but did not result in any objective responses in gemcitabine refractory pancreatic cancer. However, several patients had prolonged stable disease, suggesting that further studies of eribulin in pancreatic cancer may be warranted.     

A phase II study of an oxaliplatin/vinorelbine/5-fluorouracil combination in patients with anthracycline-pretreated and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer

The aim of this phase II study was to evaluate safety and efficacy of an oxaliplatin/vinorelbine/5-fluorouracil (FON) combination in anthracycline and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer patients. The following treatment was given: on day 1 of a 21-day cycle, oxaliplatin 130 mg/m (2-h intravenous infusion); on days 1 and 5, vinorelbine [dose level (DL) 1: 17.5 mg/m; DL2: 22 mg/m]; on days 1-5, continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil (DL1: 600 mg/m/day; DL2: 750 mg/m/day). Forty-seven patients were treated (DL1: 43; DL2: 4). Median age was 54 years; 68% had liver metastases, 53% were taxane refractory/resistant and 38% were anthracycline refractory/resistant. Patients received a median of six treatment cycles. Of 46 eligible patients, 16 had partial response; the overall response rate was 34.8% (95% confidence interval 21.3-50.3%), 11 had stable disease lasting more than 4 months. Median follow-up was 13.0 months, median time to progression 5.7 months and estimated overall survival 18.8 months. DL2 was too toxic with three patients having grade 3-4 toxicity, including one death. At DL1, 26 patients (60%) experienced grade 3-4 neutropenia (six febrile neutropenia) and eight had grade 3 oxaliplatin-specific peripheral neuropathy after a median of 646.4 mg/m oxaliplatin (range 124-1619 mg/m). Oxaliplatin (130 mg/m, day 1)/vinorelbine (17.5 mg/m, days 1,5)/5-fluorouracil (600 mg/m/day, days 1-5) demonstrate encouraging activity and a manageable safety profile in anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer patients.     

A phase II study of rebeccamycin analog NSC 655649 in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

The analog, rebeccamycin tartrate salt (NSC 655649, Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, National Cancer Institute) has broad preclinical anti-neoplastic activity. Preliminary data from phase I study demonstrated anti-tumor activity in colorectal carcinoma. This phase II trial evaluates its efficacy in patients with minimally treated metastatic colorectal cancer. Eligibility included Karnofsky performance status 70%, age 18 years and bidimensionally measurable disease. Thirteen patients were treated with NSC 655649 at 500mg/m² by central venous catheter once every 3 weeks by bolus injection. Thirty-four cycles (median [range] 2 [1–6]) of therapy were administered. Twelve patients are eligible for response assessment. No major objective responses were seen using the RECIST criteria; however stable disease was observed in three patients with mean duration of 15 weeks. The median time to progression was 8 weeks. There was no toxic death. Four patients received only one cycle of treatment, and three had disease progression. Toxicities were tolerable and hematologic toxicity was the most common. The median (range) granulocyte and platelet nadir counts were 2043/l (116–16,374/l) and 276×10³/l (5–769), respectively. Non-hematologic toxicities were moderate, including generalized weakness/fatigue, nausea/vomiting, diarrhea and anorexia. One patient required dose reduction; three patients required dose delays. NSC 655649 at this dose and schedule is inactive against advanced previously minimally treated metastatic colorectal cancer and further study of this drug as a single agent in this disease using an every three-week schedule is not warranted.     

Weekly docetaxel in patients with pretreated metastatic breast cancer: a phase II trial

Docetaxel has consistently demonstrated its high activity as an antineoplastic agent in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. However, 90% of patients receiving the recommended dose of 100 mg/m2 every 3 weeks will develop grade 3 or 4 neutropenia. Recent data suggest that the safety profile of a weekly docetaxel regimen compared favorably with the standard 3-week schedule. Thus, we initiated a phase II study to assess the efficacy and toxicity of weekly docetaxel in pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer. Twenty patients with advanced, anthra-cycline-refractory breast cancer were included in this phase II trial. Docetaxel was administered at a starting dose of 40 mg/m2, repeated once a week for 3 consecutive weeks followed by a 1-week rest period (1 cycle). Patients were evaluated for tumor response every 8 weeks (after every other cycle). Therapy was continued for a maximum of six courses in patients showing tumor response or stable disease. Twenty patients received a total of 204 weekly infusions of docetaxel. The mean number of treatments was 10.2 (range 1-18). Eighteen patients were assessable for response. Five patients achieved a partial response and six patients showed either stable disease or a minor response. Seven patients had disease progression. The median survival was 7.8 months. Grade 3/4 leukopenia occurred in two patients. No other grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicities were observed. The following grade 3/4 non-hematologic toxicities were seen: nausea/vomiting (one patient), infection (one patient), mucositis (two patients) and diarrhea (one patient). Three patients withdrew from the study due to dose-limiting toxicities (one due to severe neutropenia and two due to mucositis). We conclude that administration of docetaxel at a dose of 40 mg/m2 was effective and well tolerated even in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer. This regimen is associated with only mild myelosuppression.     

A phase II randomized study of cetuximab and bevacizumab alone or in combination with gemcitabine as first-line therapy for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma

The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab plus cetuximab with or without gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma, previously untreated, were randomized to bevacizumab (10 mg/kg q2w) plus cetuximab (400/250 mg/m(2) initial/weekly), either with (Arm A) or without (Arm B) gemcitabine (1000 mg/m(2) weekly × 3 of 4 weeks). Tumor assessments were performed q8w. Primary study endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Sixty-one patients were randomized to Arm A (n = 30) or Arm B (n = 31). Median treatment duration was 9 weeks in Arm A and 8 weeks in Arm B (range, 2.0-40.4). Patients in Arm A had median PFS and overall survival values of 3.55 months and 5.41 months, respectively, compared to 1.91 months and 4.17 months in Arm B. The study closed early due to lack of sufficient efficacy in both treatment arms. Although both regimens were well tolerated, patients treated with gemcitabine experienced more grade 3-4 toxicities, including proteinuria and thromboembolic events. The combination of cetuximab and bevacizumab did not result in promising activity with or without gemcitabine, suggesting that a strategy of dual EGFR/VEGF inhibition in pancreatic cancer does not warrant further development. To our knowledge, this is one of the first trials to evaluate a completely noncytotoxic regimen in the first-line treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00326911).     

Weekly administration of bendamustine as salvage therapy in metastatic breast cancer: final results of a phase II study

Single-agent bendamustine has shown promise in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. As toxicity was low after weekly administration of this drug in other solid tumors, the present double-center phase II trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of weekly bendamustine as salvage treatment in metastatic breast cancer. A total of 34 patients with anthracycline (88%) and/or taxane (71%) pretreated for metastatic breast cancer received 60 mg/m bendamustine on day 1, 8 and 15 every 28 days for six cycles. In addition, 10 patients with HER2/neu-overexpressing tumors either continued (five patients) or started treatment with 2 mg/kg trastuzumab weekly (loading dose 4 mg/kg) at study entry. Patients had predominantly visceral disease and had received one (88%) or two chemotherapy regimens for metastatic breast cancer. All patients were eligible for toxicity and 27 for response evaluation. No grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicity occurred. Only three patients experienced grade 3 nonhematologic toxicity. Five patients (19%) reached a partial response. Stable disease for at least 6 months was achieved in eight patients, for a clinical benefit rate of 48%. The median progression-free survival and median overall survival were 6 months (range, 1-16) and 15 months (range, 2-28), respectively. We conclude that weekly bendamustine is a valid treatment option in patients with anthracycline-pretreated and/or taxanepretreated metastatic breast cancer; in particular, due to its low toxicity profile. Future trials should evaluate higher single doses of bendamustine in a weekly schedule.