Emergency physician perspectives on child passenger safety: a national survey of attitudes and practices

ObjectiveTo understand attitudes and self-reported practices of pediatric and general emergency physicians regarding child passenger safety.MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional mailed national survey of 600 pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) physicians and 600 emergency medicine (EM) physicians who provide clinical care in the United States randomly sampled from the American Medical Association Physician Masterfile. Survey questions explored attitudes related to the role of the physician and the emergency department (ED) in child passenger safety and self-reported frequency of performing specific child passenger safety practices.ResultsResponses were received from 638 of 1000 (64%) eligible physicians with a valid mailing address. Surveys were completed by 367 PEM and 271 EM physicians. Regardless of their training background, emergency physicians overwhelmingly agreed that it is their role to educate parents about child passenger safety (95% PEM vs 82% EM) and that they can make a difference in how parents restrain their child (92% PEM vs 93% EM). Physicians were similar in their views that the most appropriate person to provide child passenger safety information in their ED was a nurse/midlevel provider followed by a physician. Self-report of child passenger safety practices in response to 2 hypothetical scenarios showed physicians infrequently provide best-practice safety recommendations to families.ConclusionsEmergency physicians are supportive of the ED as a setting to promote child passenger safety, yet do not consistently promote child passenger safety themselves. Differences between PEM and EM physicians’ attitudes toward child passenger safety may necessitate different approaches on injury prevention in general and pediatric EDs.     

The art of communication: strategies to improve efficiency, quality of care and patient safety in the emergency department

The practice of pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) has been supported by wonderful advancements in diagnostic testing, particularly in medical imaging. One of the most remarkable has been CT, which has arguably become our most valuable diagnostic tool in the emergency department (ED). PEM specialists have grown increasingly aware of quality and safety concerns in the care of children in emergency medical settings, spurred in part by a rapid growth in ED utilization and significant overcrowding. In the midst of this comes the revelation that one of our most valued diagnostic tools might place our youngest patients at a significant risk for the development of fatal cancer. This article reinforces the fundamental importance of communication and teamwork as a means to promote patient care quality and safety in the ED, and it offers partnership strategies for PEM and pediatric radiology specialists to consider as they address these important concerns.     

Patient complaints in a pediatric emergency department: averting lawsuits

All emergency departments (EDs) receive complaints from patients and their families. Consumers of pediatric emergency care are becoming more astute about the care they receive, and the malpractice climate is rapidly changing. In order to improve patient care services and reduce the frequency of lawsuits, it is crucial that pediatric emergency medicine physicians become facile at preventing and managing such complaints. All ED physicians should have a well-defined complaint management process in place. Lessons learned from the complaints should be shared with the ED health care providers. Complaints can illustrate the deficiencies in the provision of care and serve as an opportunity for improvement.     

Traditional practices, “folk remedies,” and the western biomedical model: bridging the divide

Pediatric emergency physicians are well-trained in addressing and treating illness within the Western biomedical model. However, more often than commonly realized, the practitioner will encounter families whose beliefs and assumptions about the etiology and appropriate treatment for various illnesses differ markedly from their own. Failure to recognize the ways that folk beliefs and therapies can impact a child’s illness may result in genuine physical harm. Conversely, the uninformed practitioner may mistake harmless folk remedies for abuse and presume that a child is in danger. This article presents a framework for understanding the role of folk medicine in the emergency care of children. This framework is followed by case studies that emphasize the importance of developing a working knowledge of the folk practices common in the populations served by the emergency medicine provider.     

The febrile child-missed meningitis and bacteremia

Children with fever often present to the emergency department (ED) for cart. Most have self-limited viral infections; some have life-threatening bacterial infections. Misdiagnosis of children with sepsis and meningitis are among the most common and most costly course for medical malpractice suits in emergency medicine. Unfortunately, there are no foolproof guidelines to prevent error in diagnosing a febrile child. Physicians are advised to use great caution if a febrile infant remains irritable and has persistent vomiting or lethargy during evaluation in the ED. If a patient does not seem improved after a period of observation and perhaps dehydration, hospital admission and empirical antibiotics arc recommended. Use particular caution when evaluating a child with fever and a petechial rash. Meticulous documentation of care provided to febrile infants and children may prevent a lawsuit in the cent of a poor outcome. In addition, it is imperative to arrange follow-up within 12 to 24 hours when there is concern about a baby's condition or when an infant's illness warranted a sepsis work-up. A follow-up phone call to the child's family may help clarify instructions and identify problems. Febrile patients who return to the ED for additional care should be carefully re-examined.     

McMediate care: Pediatric urgent care in the new millennium: What relationships should we be serving up next?

Urgent care centers are here to stay. Pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) providers treat a spectrum of diseases that range from medical and surgical emergencies to benign, low-acuity medical conditions. Therefore, it makes intuitive sense for PEM providers to be integrally involved in the development, support, and operations of urgent care (UC) centers as they evolve to meet the acute episodic health care needs of children and their families. This report outlines the spectrum of UC centers that exist, the interrelationship with PEM providers, and the balancing of UC centers within the spectrum of ambulatory care for children.     

Emergency ultrasound diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis in the pediatric emergency department: a case series

The diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) has traditionally been limited to examinations by radiologists and ultrasound technicians. Although contrast venography is considered the criterion standard for diagnosis of DVT, time, personnel, cost, exposure to radiation, and the invasive nature of the study (need for venous access) potentially limit the ability to perform the study in an emergent setting. Ultrasonography is an alternative method for thrombus detection and is widely preferred. However, in many health care settings, consultative ultrasound services may not be available immediately, especially after hours and on weekends. Based on recent studies demonstrating accuracy in adult patients, emergency sonographic evaluation of DVT by emergency physicians is considered a core emergency ultrasound application and is recently recommended as standard training to all emergency medicine residents. The diagnosis of DVT in children by emergency ultrasound in the pediatric ED has not been previously described. We present 3 cases of DVT in adolescents identified by emergency ultrasound evaluation in the pediatric ED.     

Pediatric Asthma in the Community Emergency Department: Room for Improvement and Aligned Incentives

Asthma is a common reason for emergency department (ED) visits in children. Over 80% of children who visit an ED go to a general, not a pediatric-specific, ED. The treatment children with asthma receive in general EDs is not as compliant with national guidelines as is treatment in pediatric-specific centers. Several studies document improvements in pediatric asthma care through quality improvement initiatives, but few address the emergency care of pediatric asthma in the community setting. National programs such as Pathways for Improving Pediatric Asthma and Translating Emergency Knowledge for Kids provide resources to community EDs for improving pediatric asthma care. More research is needed to determine if programs such as these, as well as partnerships at the local level, can have a positive impact on the emergency care of pediatric asthma. It is essential that we bridge the gaps in care between community and pediatric-specific EDs to improve the quality of emergency care for the over 7 million children in the US with asthma.     

Pediatric Emergency Medicine Attending Perspectives on Maintaining Professionalism

Attending physicians are the primary role models of professionalism, but little is known what their perspective is on the maintenance of their professionalism. This study characterizes the pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) attending perspective on maintaining professionalism during their career. Two qualitative methods were used: field observation and semi-structured interviews. Field observations were conducted in one pediatric emergency department (ED) based on a framework for professionalism education. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of PEM attendings from across the country. Interviews were transcribed and themes analyzed using an iterative, inductive process. The two differing methods allowed for data triangulation. Forty-five hours of ED observation were completed with thematic coding of observations. Seventeen interviews were conducted with PEM physicians around the country with a wide variety of demographic characteristics. Observations and interviews revealed several themes describing the PEM attending’s perspective on professionalism. Challenges to professionalism include: patient related factors (such as high volume and acuity, difficult medical situations and dissatisfied families), staff interactions (RN, ancillary, etc), trainee education and interaction, ED environment, academic pressures, and personal factors. By understanding the PEM attending perspective on professionalism, resources and education can be better targeted for professional development and interventions to solve the challenges that PEM physicians identify. Understanding the PEM attending perspective may also be useful in developing assessment tools for attendings and may provide deeper insight into the impact of role models on trainee professionalism education.     

Risk management: medical malpractice and Emergency Department

Because of the limited number of comprehensive paediatric centres, providing the entire continuum of paediatric care, including subspecialty care, and generally serving as regional referral centres for tertiary paediatrics, paediatric emergency care in Italy is often provided in adult facilities within primarily adult hospital institutions. Consequently, most paediatricians working in hospitals with a separate paediatric ward or department provide Emergency Department (ED) on-call coverage with serious liability concerns: such concerns are due to the fact that successful care of infants and children in an emergency situation requires appropriately sized equipment, well trained staff, appropriate and specialised triage and destination guidelines but, unfortunately, not all Italian facilities fulfil all these criteria. Risk management training of the entire ED staff may reduce the institution's involvement in malpractice litigation. Another useful tool within a paediatric ED is an Observation Unit (OU) for well-defined illnesses (such as asthma, croup, bronchiolitis, gastroenteritis, abdominal pain, mild dehydration, overdoses or poisoning, seizures), which can assure better patient's care, a decrease in missed diagnosis and acuity and decreased lenght of stay, and, consequently, a better risk management, decreased malpractice liability and cost effectiveness. Furthermore, in our paper we aimed to highlight the importance of aspects with a potential risk exposure in our profession, such as informed consent, exculpatory release forms, incident reports and complete ED record documentation of paediatric patients. In addition to that, the quality of care provided at ED in Italy has been assessed by analysing ED-related paediatric malpractice claims in the last 10 years. Finally, the importance of a joint commission within the Italian Paediatrics Society is underlined in order to discuss practice guidelines for paediatricians involved in emergency care.     

Best Practices for Discussing Injury Prevention With Pediatric Patients and Families

Pediatric emergency centers treat millions of unintentional injuries cases every year, and many of these injuries could have potentially been avoided by proper counseling about trauma safety and prevention. Through such discussions, clinicians have the ability to meaningfully decrease the number of these unintentional injuries. Not enough attention has been placed on critically injured children and adolescents who have a substantial burden on health care resources and morbidity. Emergency medicine providers and pediatricians have the responsibility to educate patients and families about proper child passenger safety and to remain up to date on this information. However, numerous barriers still exist for physicians to fully counsel patients and their families about firearms. Pediatric emergency medicine physicians can play a foundational role in the safety, prevention, and treatment of childhood injuries. Clinicians can become effective instructors for injury prevention by using the Haddon Matrix: host, agent, and environment; and the 3 Es of injury prevention: education, engineering, and enforcement of strategies. Legislative changes, educational approaches, and product modifications must come together to effectively achieve this goal. Although the idea of educating families in the emergency department may seem ideal because the immediacy of the current injury may make the families more receptive to the counseling, the integration of primary care physicians is beneficial for regular follow-ups and maintenance.     

The training of pediatric residents in the care of acutely ill and injured children

OBJECTIVES: To describe the current educational experience of pediatric residents in pediatric emergency care, to identify areas of variability between residency programs, and to distinguish areas in need of further improvement. DESIGN: A 63-item survey mailed to all accredited pediatric residency training program directors in the United States and Puerto Rico. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Pediatric residency programs and their directors. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary training settings, required and elective rotations related to the care of the acutely ill and injured child, supervision of care, procedural and technical training, and didactic curriculum in pediatric emergency medicine (PEM). RESULTS: One hundred fifty-three (72%) of 213 residency programs responded. One hundred nine (71%) were based at general or university hospitals, the remaining 44 (29%) were based at freestanding children's hospitals. Residents most commonly saw patients in pediatric emergency departments (54%), followed by acute care clinics (21%), general emergency departments (21%), and urgent care clinics (5%). The mean number of weeks of PEM training required was 11, but varied widely from 0 to 36 weeks. Forty programs (27%) required their residents to spend 4 or fewer weeks rotating in an emergency department setting. The best predictor of the number of weeks spent in emergency medicine was residency program size, with small programs requiring fewer weeks (7 weeks for small [1-8 postgraduate year 1 residents] vs 13 for medium [9-17 postgraduate year 1 residents] vs 15 for large [> or =18 postgraduate year 1 residents]). Pediatric surgery (18%), orthopedic (8%), anesthesia (6%), and toxicology (4%) rotations were rarely required. Ninety-two percent of the programs had 24-hour on-site attending physician coverage of the emergency department. Supervising physicians varied widely in their training and included PEM attendings and fellows, general emergency medicine attendings, and general pediatric attendings. Small programs were less likely to have PEM coverage (57% at small vs 95% at large) and more likely to have general emergency medicine coverage (79% at small vs 29% at large). Reported opportunities to perform procedures were uniformly high and did not differ by program size or affiliated fellowship. Residency program directors were uniformly confident in their residents' training in medical resuscitation, critical care, emergency care, airway management, and minor trauma. Thirty-seven percent of all respondents were not confident in their residents' training in major trauma. Most programs reported that they had a didactic PEM curriculum (77%), although the number of hours devoted to the lectures varied substantially. CONCLUSIONS: Wide variability exists in the amount of time devoted to emergency medicine within pediatric residency training curricula and in the training background of attendings used to supervise patient care and resident education. Nevertheless, pediatric residency training programs directors feel confident in their residents training in most topics related to PEM. Residents' training in major trauma resuscitation was the most frequently cited deficiency.     

Emergency medicine and injury prevention: meeting at the intersection

Emergency medicine (EM) physicians need little convincing that injury prevention is a public health priority. Clinical experience alone creates a clear appreciation for the impact that injuries have on children and their families. The role of the EM physician is evolving from primary responsibility for the acute care of injuries to a more expanded prevention role including education, research and advocacy. Many emergency department (ED)-based injury prevention projects have been developed and individual EM physicians have emerged as leaders in the field of injury prevention. However, challenges remain. Development of effective interventions which can realistically be implemented in a busy ED are lacking. Expansion of the role of the emergency health care provider outside the hospital, in the community, has great potential for success. The goal of this paper is to discuss the current status of primary injury prevention within emergency medicine, barriers that exist and areas of opportunity.     

The Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN): rationale,development, and first steps

Since its formal recognition as a medical specialty, the field of pediatric emergency medicine has made substantial advances with respect to its scope and sophistication. These advances have occurred in clinical practice as well as in the research base to improve clinical practice. There remain, however, many areas in emergency medical services for children (EMSC) in the out-of-hospital, emergency department (ED), and hospital settings that suffer from a lack of data to guide practice. In an effort to expand the quality and quantity of research in pediatric emergency care, the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) was created in October of 2001. PECARN is the first federally funded national network for research in EMSC and is the result of cooperative agreement grants funded through the Health Resources and Services Administration with the purpose of developing an infrastructure capable of overcoming inherent barriers to EMSC research. Among these recognized barriers are low incidence rates of serious pediatric emergency events, the need for large numbers of children from varied backgrounds to achieve broadly representative study samples, lack of an infrastructure to test the efficacy of pediatric emergency care, and the need for a mechanism to translate study results into clinical practice. PECARN will serve as a national platform for collaborative research involving the continuum of care within the EMSC system, including out-of-hospital care, patient transport, ED and in-hospital care, and rehabilitation. This article describes the history of EMSC, the need for a national collaborative research network in EMSC, the organization and development of PECARN, and the work plan for the network.     

The role of the pediatrician in rural emergency medical services for children

In rural America, pediatricians can play a key role in the development, implementation, and ongoing supervision of emergency medical services for children. Pediatricians may represent the only source of pediatric expertise for a large region and are a vital resource for rural physicians (eg, general and family medicine, emergency medicine), other rural health care professionals (physician assistants, nurse practitioners, emergency medical technicians), and local emergency medical services medical directors. They can provide education about management and prevention of pediatric illness and injury; appropriate equipment for the acutely ill or injured child; and acute, chronic, and rehabilitative care. In addition to providing clinical expertise, the pediatrician may be involved in quality assurance, clinical protocol development, and advocacy and may serve as a liaison between emergency medical services and other entities working with children (eg, school nurses, child care centers, athletic programs, and programs for children with special health care needs).     

Reported Knowledge and Management of Potential Penicillin Allergy in Children

BackgroundPediatric emergency medicine (PEM) and primary care provider (PCP) providers are the most likely physicians to initially label a child as allergic to penicillin. Differences in knowledge and management of reported penicillin allergy between these 2 groups have not been well characterized.MethodsA cross-sectional, 20-question survey was administered to PEM and PCPs to ascertain differential knowledge and management of penicillin allergy. Knowledge regarding high- and low-risk symptoms for true allergy and extent of history taking regarding allergy were compared between the 2 groups using t tests, Chi-square, and Wilcoxon tests.ResultsIn total, 182 PEM and 54 PCPs completed the survey. PEM and PCPs reported that 74.1 ± 19.5% and 69.0 ± 23.8% of patients with remote low-risk symptoms of allergy could tolerate penicillin without an allergic reaction. PEM and PCPs incorrectly identified low-risk symptoms of allergy as high-risk, including vomiting with medication administration and delayed skin rash. PCPs took more detailed allergy histories when compared with PEM providers. In total, 143 (78.5%) of PEM providers and 51 (94.4%) PCPs were interested in using a penicillin allergy questionnaire to segregate children into high- or low-risk categories.ConclusionsMost pediatric providers believe that children with a remote history of low-risk allergy symptoms could tolerate penicillin without an allergic reaction; however, this is infrequently acted upon. Both PEM and PCP providers were likely to classify low-risk symptoms as high-risk and infrequently referred children for further detailed allergy assessment. Both groups were receptive to decision support measures to facilitate improved penicillin allergy classification and labeling and support antibiotic appropriateness in their patients.     

Emergency Care of the Technology-Assisted Child

As more special needs children reside in community settings, emergency physicians will continue to play an important role in the overall care of these children. To this end, emergency medical services providers and ED physicians should have a familiarity in recognizing and managing acute complications of chronic disease states and in troubleshooting equipment problems. In addition to assisting with acute crises, the emergency provider can be instrumental in helping families with CSHCN integrate successfully into the community by reminding families of important measures that they should take to optimize their child's medical care. In particular, families should be encouraged to have medical summary information and go-bags wherever they travel and to develop written emergency care plans in concert with their primary care provider. The Emergency Information Form co-developed by the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American College of Emergency Physicians is an excellent resource for families with CSHCN [45]. In addition, it is important for families of chronically ill and technology-assisted children to notify community emergency medical services departments and local utility companies of their residence [5]. Together, the medical community and families can partner to ensure optimal medical care and community integration of special needs children.     

Pediatric trauma: an approach to the injured child

The approach to the injured child requires great care and clinical acumen to establish the diagnosis and institute appropriate treatment. Loss of life from occult internal hemorrhage or neurologic sequelae from a missed unstable cervical spine injury may be devastating. Yet, physicians in the ED must also know which children need only a careful physical examination, and when laboratory testing or admission is unnecessary. We have described a schema for providing appropriate care to children with trauma in such a way that specific issues about management can be reasonably approached by the emergency physician.