On the role of noradrenaline in psychostimulant-induced psychomotor activity and sensitization

Rationale Psychostimulant drugs exert their behavioral effects primarily through enhancement of monoaminergic neurotransmission. Augmented dopamine activity is thought to play a critical role in the psychomotor stimulant effects of amphetamine and cocaine, as well as in the development of long-term behavioral sensitization evoked by repeated exposure to amphetamine. However, despite the fact that brain dopamine and noradrenaline systems are closely interconnected, the extent to which noradrenergic transmission contributes to these behavioral effects of psychostimulants is a relatively unexplored issue. Objectives By inhibiting noradrenergic neurotransmission with the α₂-adrenoceptor agonist clonidine, the α₁-antagonist prazosin and the β-antagonist propranolol, we investigated the involvement of noradrenaline neurotransmission in the psychomotor stimulant and long-term sensitizing effects of d-amphetamine and cocaine in rats. Methods Clonidine (0.003–0.1 mg/kg), prazosin (0.1–3.0 mg/kg) and propranolol (1.0–3.0 mg/kg) were administered prior to d-amphetamine (1.0 mg/kg), cocaine (15 mg/kg) or apomorphine (1.0 mg/kg) and psychomotor activity was measured. In separate studies, clonidine (0.03 mg/kg), prazosin (1.0 mg/kg) or propranolol (3.0 mg/kg) were co-administered with d-amphetamine (2.5 mg/kg) or cocaine (30 mg/kg) for 5 days, and locomotor sensitization was assessed 3 weeks post-treatment. Results The psychomotor stimulant effect of d-amphetamine, but not that of cocaine or apomorphine, was dose-dependently inhibited by clonidine and prazosin, and enhanced by propranolol. Clonidine, prazosin, and propranolol did not influence the induction of sensitization by amphetamine or cocaine. Conclusions Enhancement of synaptic noradrenaline concentrations contributes to the psychomotor stimulant effect of d-amphetamine, but not cocaine or apomorphine. In addition, noradrenergic neurotransmission is not critically involved in the induction of psychostimulant sensitization.     

Effects of cannabinoid receptor ligands on psychosis-relevant behavior models in the rat

Abstract Rationale. Marijuana is known to have psychotropic effects in humans. In this study, we used rat models of sensorimotor gating, hyperactivity and stereotypy to explore whether CB₁ receptor stimulation or blockade induces behavioral changes consistent with psychotomimetic or antipsychotic agents, respectively. Objectives. We determined whether (a) the cannabinoid agonist CP 55940 decreased pre-pulse inhibition (PPI) as might be expected from a psychotomimetic agent, and (b) the selective CB₁ receptor antagonist, SR 141716A, had any effect on PPI on its own or following disruptions by psychotomimetic agents. In addition, we investigated the effects of SR 141716A on elevated levels of hyperactivity and stereotypy elicited by d-amphetamine. Methods. These studies were conducted in rats using standard methodologies for determination of PPI following acoustic stimuli, and d-amphetamine-induced hyperactivity and stereotypies. Results. Decreased startle responses to 120 dB stimuli were observed in rats treated with CP 55940 (0.1 mg/kg IP) in the absence and presence of a 73 dB pre-pulse. These effects were reversed by SR 141716A (5 and 10 mg/kg, respectively). SR 141716A (0.1, 5, 10 mg/kg) had no effect on PPI on its own or following disruptions by apomorphine, d-amphetamine or MK-801. Conversely, in separate experiments different antipsychotic agents reversed disruptions in PPI induced by d-amphetamine (haloperidol), apomorphine (haloperidol or clozapine) or MK-801 (clozapine or olanzapine). In addition, unlike haloperidol, SR 141716A (5 mg/kg) did not reverse d-amphetamine-mediated increases in hyperactivity or stereotypy. Conclusions. The CP 55940-mediated decreases in startle amplitude confound assessment of the effects of CB₁ receptor activation on PPI. The failure of SR 141716A to reverse disruptions in PPI, hyperactivity or stereotypy induced by non-cannabinoid psychotomimetic agents suggests that blockade of the CB₁ receptor on its own is not sufficient for antipsychotic therapy. Electronic Publication     

Dopaminergic stimulation disrupts sensorimotor gating in the rat

Prepulse inhibition is a cross-species phenomenon in which reflex responses to discrete sensory events are modified by weak prestimulation. In experiments designed to investigate the neuropharmacological mechanism of this form of information processing, and its relevance to schizophrenic psychopathology, apomorphine (0.125–4.0 mg/kg) and d-amphetamine (0.5–4.0 mg/kg) were administered to rats in an attempt to modify prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle response. Rats were presented with 40 ms, 118 dB[A] acoustic pulses which were intermittently preceded by a weak 80 dB[A] acoustic prepulse. Both apomorphine and d-amphetamine induced a significant loss of prepulse inhibition, as reflected by increased pulse-preceded-by-prepulse versus pulse-alone startle magnitudes. Haloperidol (0.1 mg/kg), a specific D2 dopamine receptor antagonist, prevented the effects of 2.0 mg/kg apomorphine on prepulse inhibition, while having little effect by itself. An additional study investigated the effects of chronic intermittent administration of 2.5 mg/kg d-amphetamine. Rats given amphetamine for 8 consecutive days also displayed a loss of prepulse inhibition, with no evidence of tolerance. Finally, prepulse inhibition was examined under high- and low-intensity startle stimulus conditions; apomorphine (1.0 mg/kg) induced a loss of prepulse inhibition under both intensity conditions in approximately equal proportion. The results of these studies suggest a connection between sensorimotor gating, as measured by prepulse inhibition, and dopaminergic overactivity, supporting suggestions that information processing deficits in schizophrenia may be responsible for some psychotic symptoms and their effective treatment by antipsychotic D2 dopamine antagonists.     

Effects of triadimefon on a multiple schedule of fixed-interval performance: Comparison with methylphenidate, d-amphetamine and chlorpromazine

Triadimefon is a fungicide that has recently been shown to increase motor activity and rates of schedule-controlled responding. These findings indicate that triadimefon resembles psychomotor stimulants and in this respect is a unique pesticide. The present experiment was designed to evaluate triadimefon's effects on performance maintained by a multiple schedule of reinforcement and to compare triadimefon to known psychomotor stimulants. Four rats were trained to perform under a mult FI 1-min FI 5-min schedule of milk reinforcement. They then received a series of dosages of triadimefon (10–170 mg/kg, IP) and of methylphenidate (1–17.3 mg/kg, IP) in a counterbalanced order. Triadimefon increased response rates in both the FI 1-min and FI 5-min components. Methylphenidate did not consistently alter response rates in either component. Temporal patterns of responding were disrupted much more in the FI 5-min component than in the FI 1-min component by both triadimefon and methylphenidate. Performances were then evaluated following a series of dosages of d-amphetamine (0.3–3.0 mg/kg, IP) and chlorpromazine (0.5–2.0 mg/kg, IP). Response rates were increased d-amphetamine in the FI 1-min component but not in the FI 5-min component. Like triadimefon and methylphenidate, d-amphetamine produced a greater disruption of response patterning in FI 5-min than in FI 1-min. Only chlorpromazine decreased response rates in both components. Chlorpromazine also disrupted FI 5-min response patterning, but left FI 1-min patterning intact. Although triadimefon did not closely resemble any of the comparison drugs, it had opposite effects on response rates from chlorpromazine in both components of the schedule and resembled d-amphetamine in its effects on FI 1-min response rates. The rate-increasing effects frequently obtained with psychomotor stimulants were more evident for triadimefon than for either methylphenidate or d-amphetamine.     

CRF1 receptor antagonists do not reverse pharmacological disruption of prepulse inhibition in rodents

Rationale

As enhanced corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) transmission is associated with induction of sensorimotor gating deficits, CRF₁ receptor antagonists may reverse disrupted prepulse inhibition (PPI), an operational measure of sensorimotor gating.

Objectives

To determine the effects of CRF₁ receptor antagonists in pharmacological models of disrupted PPI and to determine if long-term elevated central CRF levels alter sensitivity towards PPI disrupting drugs.

Methods

CP154,526 (10–40 mg/kg), SSR125543 (3–30 mg/kg) and DMP695 (40 mg/kg) were tested on PPI disruption provoked by d-amphetamine (2.5, 3 mg/kg), ketamine (5, 30 mg/kg) and MK801 (0.2, 0.5 mg/kg) in Wistar rats, C57Bl/6J and CD1 mice, and on spontaneously low PPI in Iffa Credo rats and DBA/2J mice. PPI-disrupting effects of d-amphetamine (2.5–5 mg/kg) and MK801 (0.3–1 mg/kg) were examined in CRF-overexpressing (CRFtg) mice, which display PPI deficits. Finally, we determined the influence of CP154,526 on d-amphetamine-induced dopamine outflow in nucleus accumbens and prefrontal cortex of CRFtg mice using in vivo microdialysis.

Results

No CRF_1?antagonists improved PPI deficits in any test. CRFtg mice showed blunted PPI disruption in response to MK801, but not d-amphetamine. Further, d-amphetamine-induced dopamine release was less pronounced in CRFtg versus wild-type mice, a response normalized by pretreatment with CP154,526.

Conclusion

The inability of CRF₁ receptor antagonists to block pharmacological disruption of sensorimotor gating suggests that the involvement of CRF1 receptors in the modulation of dopaminergic and glutamatergic neurotransmission relevant for sensory gating is limited. Furthermore, the alterations observed in CRFtg mice support the notion that long-term elevated central CRF levels induce changes in these neurotransmitter systems.     

Effects of acute ethanol or amphetamine administration on the acoustic startle response and prepulse inhibition in adolescent and adult rats

Rationale Adolescents differ from adults in their sensitivity to a variety of psychoactive drugs. For example, adolescent rats are less sensitive to locomotor stimulant and stereotypic effects of amphetamine as well as to motor-impairing and hypnotic effects of ethanol while more sensitive to ethanol-induced disruption of brain plasticity.Objective The current study further explored age differences in psychopharmacological sensitivity by examining the effects of d-amphetamine (1.0 and 4.0 mg/kg) or ethanol (0.5, 1.0 and 1.5 g/kg) given interperitoneally on the acoustic startle response (ASR) and prepulse inhibition (PPI) in male adolescent and adult Sprague–Dawley rats.Materials and methods The animals were given five startle trials (120 dB for 40 ms) before semi-randomized presentation of 12 startle trials interspersed with ten trials at each prepulse intensity (40 ms pulse of 5, 10, or 20 dB above background; 100 ms before the startle stimulus).Results Adolescent controls showed significantly less PPI than adults, replicating previous ontogenetic findings. The higher dose of amphetamine disrupted PPI in adult but not in adolescent animals, extending previous reports of an adolescent insensitivity to amphetamine to include this measure of sensorimotor gating. Ethanol exposure failed to alter PPI at either age, although both the 1.0 and 1.5 g/kg doses of ethanol significantly suppressed the magnitude of the ASR at both ages, potentially reflecting sedative or anxiolytic effects.Conclusion These data provide further evidence of the relative insensitivity of adolescent animals to amphetamine, although no age effects were found in terms of ethanol sensitivity using these measures of startle and sensorimotor gating.     

Long-term d-amphetamine in rats: Lack of change in post-synaptic dopamine receptor sensitivity

Treatment of rats with d-amphetamine (5 mg/kg) once daily for 25 days did not change locomotor responses, on day 7 of withdrawal, to dopamine (DA) or d-amphetamine into the nucleus accumbens. Nor was there a change in ³H-spiperone binding of caudate nucleus membranes. There was no effect of treatment on the locomotor response of rats to 1.0, 1.5 or 2.0 mg/kg d-amphetamine IP. However, d-amphetamine-treated rats were significantly less sensitive to 0.5 mg d-amphetamine. Although 1, 2 or 3 mg/kg apomorphine produced the same degree of stereotypy in both treatment groups, there was a significant difference in the response of the two groups to 0.5 mg apomorphine, d-amphetamine-treated animals being less sensitive than vehicle-treated animals. No change was found in brain DA levels with or without synthesis inhibition. The present data do not support the hypothesis that chronic treatment of rats with d-amphetamine can produce supersensitive post-synaptic DA receptors.     

Studies on electroencephalogram (EEG) in rats suggest that moderate doses of cocaine ord-amphetamine activate D1 rather than D2 receptors

The effects of cocaine andd-amphetamine, two psychomotor stimulant drugs with pronounced addictive properties, on the electroencephalogram (EEG) of rats were studied by telemetric recordings from the skull in non-anesthetized, freely moving rats. The electrocorticogram (ECoG) was recorded. Both cocaine (10 mg/kg IP) andd-amphetamine (0.4 mg/kg IP) produced a desynchronization, characterized by a general lowering in power in all of the frequency bands. These effects of both drugs were mimicked by the selective agonist at D₁ receptors SK&F 38393 (3 mg/kg SC) and were reversed by the antagonist at D₁ receptors SCH 23390 (0.2 mg/kg IP) but not influenced by haloperidol (0.1 mg/kg IP) in a dose which is likely to block D₂ rather than D₁ receptors. These doses of cocaine ord-amphetamine did not produce stereotyped behaviour and slight, if any, increases in locomotor activity only. Large doses of cocaine (30 mg/kg IP) ord-amphetamine (4 mg/kg IP) produced stereotyped behaviour and alterations in EEG which are, based on previous own studies, characteristic for additional stimulation of D₂ receptors. This was manifest in a selective increase in power of the alpha-1 band. A similar effect was also produced by the agonist both at D₁ and D₂ receptors, apomorphine (0.5 mg/kg SC). These results suggest that moderate, but probably rewarding doses of cocaine ord-amphetamine mainly activate D₁ dopamine receptors. This activation might be relevant for the rewarding properties of these drugs.     

Altered prepulse inhibition in rats treated prenatally with the antimitotic Ara-C: an animal model for sensorimotor gating deficits in schizophrenia

Rationale Sensorimotor gating disruption is one of many neurocognitive deficits seen in schizophrenia. Disorganized thought is one of the cardinal symptoms associated with sensorimotor gating. In an attempt to model sensorimotor gating deficits in rats relevant to the neurodevelopmental hypothesis for schizophrenia, we have used prenatal injections of the antimitotic drug, cytosine arabinoside (Ara-C) to subtly perturb the development of the rat CNS and disrupt sensorimotor gating.Objective To produce rats with either basal sensorimotor gating deficits or increased vulnerability to the disruption of sensorimotor function by apomorphine or phencyclidine (PCP). Prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the acoustic startle response was used to assess sensorimotor gating.Methods Three different cohorts of pregnant Sprague Dawley female rats were injected with Ara-C (30 mg/kg in saline) or saline at embryonic days 19.5 and 20.5. The Ara-C and control rats were tested for acoustic startle response and PPI at preadolescent and post-adolescent ages; postnatal day (Pnd) 35 and 56, respectively. Apomorphine (2.0 mg/kg) or phencyclidine (3.0 mg/kg), was given prior to PPI sessions in order to disrupt PPI.Results At Pnd 35, Ara-C treatment did not significantly affect acoustic startle amplitudes or PPI. However, at PND 56, Ara-C treated rats had significantly lower acoustic startle amplitudes and significantly diminished sensorimotor gating. Pharmacological challenge with the dopamine agonist apomorphine and the glutamate antagonist PCP significantly disrupted sensorimotor gating in the control subjects. Apomorphine did not further disrupt the existing deficit in the Ara-C treated rats. Ara-C treatment did not cause gross loss of neuronal tissue, although there was a subtle and variable disorganization of the pyramidal cell layer in the hippocampal CA_2/3 region.Conclusion The results provide evidence to suggest that late embryonic exposure to Ara-C disrupts the circuitry involved in mediating PPI. While the dopamine agonist apomorphine caused a significant disruption in the control rats it did not further disrupt the existing deficit in the Ara-C treated rats. These data provide evidence to support the contention that modest neurodevelopmental insults can significantly affect sensorimotor gating processes in an adult onset dependent manner.     

Differential effects of ketamine on gating of auditory evoked potentials and prepulse inhibition in rats

Schizophrenic patients suffer from deficits in information processing. Patients show both a decrease in P50 gating [assessed in the conditioning-testing (C-T) paradigm] and prepulse inhibition (PPI), two paradigms that assess gating. These two paradigms might have a related underlying neural substrate. Gating, as measured in both the C-T paradigm (the gating of a component of the auditory evoked potential (AEP)], and PPI can easily be measured in animals as well as in humans. This offers the opportunity to model these information processing paradigms in animals in order to investigate the effects of neurotransmitter manipulations in the brain. In order to validate the animal model for disturbances in AEP gating, d-amphetamine (0.5 and 1 mg/kg, IP) was administered. Gating of an AEP component was changed due to injection of d-amphetamine (1 mg/kg) in the same way as seen in schizophrenic patients: both the amplitude to the conditioning click and the gating were significantly reduced. Next, the effect of the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonist ketamine (2.5 and 10 mg/kg, IP) was investigated to assess its effects in the two gating paradigms. It was found that ketamine (10 mg/kg) did not affect gating as measured with components of the AEP. However, ketamine (10 mg/kg) disrupted PPI of the startle response to the extent that prepulse facilitation occurred. Firstly, it is concluded that AEP gating was disrupted by d-amphetamine and not by ketamine. Secondly, PPI and the C-T paradigm reflect distinct inhibitory sensory processes, since both paradigms are differentially influenced by ketamine. Received: 24 September 1997/Final version: 23 July 1998     

Influence of naloxone upon motor activity induced by psychomotor stimulant drugs

Naloxone, an opioid receptor antagonist, attenuates a wide range of behavioral effects ofd-amphetamine, such as the stimulation of motor activity. To investigate the pharmacological selectivity of the naloxone/amphetamine interaction, we assessed the effects of naloxone (5.0 mg/kg SC) upon motor activity induced in rats by a range of psychomotor stimulant drugs with a mechanism of action either similar to or different from that ofd-amphetamine. Each of the drugs tested caused dose-dependent increases in both gross and fine activity. Naloxone attenuated the gross but not the fine activity response tod- andl-amphetamine, but had no influence upon the other catecholamine-releasing drugs, methamphetamine and phendimetrazine. In contrast, naloxone increased the gross but not the fine activity response to the catecholamine uptake inhibitors cocaine and mazindol, but had no effects upon the motor response to methylphenidate. The responses to other stimulant drugs (apomorphine, caffeine, scopolamine) were unaffected by naloxone pretreatment. The present findings extend the range of conditions under which naloxone and, by inference, endogenous opioid systems, modulate the behavioral response to psychomotor stimulants. However, the differential effects of naloxone upon the motor response to individual stimulant drugs support previous suggestions of fundamental differences in mechanisms of action among these compounds.     

Lamotrigine prevents ketamine but not amphetamine-induced deficits in prepulse inhibition in mice

Rationale Lamotrigine, a broad-spectrum anticonvulsant known to block brain sodium channels, is effective in the treatment of persons with bipolar disorder, perhaps by virtue of its ability to reduce glutamate release. Furthermore, lamotrigine decreases the perceptual abnormalities produced by the N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) antagonist ketamine in humans, similar to the effects of the atypical antipsychotic clozapine. Acutely manic bipolar patients, like persons with schizophrenia, Tourette's, and obsessive compulsive disorder, exhibit decreases in sensorimotor gating, as measured by prepulse inhibition of the startle response (PPI). Objective We assessed the ability of lamotrigine to reduce the PPI–disruptive effects of ketamine and the dopaminergic agent amphetamine in two inbred mouse strains, C57BL/6J and 129SvPasIco. Methods Mice were tested in a standard PPI paradigm after administration of lamotrigine (0, 6.7, 13, or 27 mg/kg) or a combination of lamotrigine (27 mg/kg) and either d-amphetamine (10 mg/kg) or ketamine (100 mg/kg). Results In the 129SvPasIco mice, lamotrigine reversed the ketamine-induced PPI deficit, without altering PPI in control mice. In C57BL/6J mice, however, 27 mg/kg lamotrigine generally increased PPI in both control and ketamine-treated mice. Lamotrigine did not ameliorate the amphetamine-induced PPI deficit in either strain. Conclusions In conclusion, lamotrigine can increase PPI on its own and prevent ketamine-induced, but not amphetamine-induced, disruptions of PPI. These results suggest that lamotrigine may exert its effects on PPI through the glutamatergic system.     

Differential effects of apomorphine on prepulse inhibition of acoustic startle reflex in two rat strains

Apomorphine disruption of prepulse inhibition (PPI) has been proposed as an animal model of sensorimotor gating deficits exhibited by schizophrenics. The effects of apomorphine on PPI of the acoustic startle reflex in male rats of Wistar and CD (Sprague-Dawley derived) strains were compared under identical test conditions. In Wistar rats, subcutaneous administration of 0.25–1.0 mg/kg apomorphine blocked PPI without affecting startle amplitude. In CD rats, apomorphine (0.3–3.0 mg/kg, SC) had no effect on PPI, but increased startle amplitude. Therefore, choice of rat strain is an important factor in the design of experiments studying apomorphine effects on PPI.     

Effects of central dopamine depletion on thed-amphetamine discriminative stimulus in rats

The discriminative stimulus properties ofd-amphetamine, cocaine, and apomorphine were assessed in rats trained in a two-lever, food-reinforced drug discrimination paradigm to discriminate 1.0 mg/kgd-amphetamine from saline. After determination of these dose-response relationships, the rats were divided into two groups. One group (6-OHDA) was given injections of desmethylimipramine (DMI, 30 mg/kg, IP) and 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA, 100 g/10 l each ventricle), while the other group (sham) was given the same dose of DMI and 6-OHDA vehicle (intraventricularly). Beginning approximately 45 days after intraventricular injections, dose-response relationships were redetermined for all three drugs. Larger doses ofd-amphetamine were required to elicit the same response in the 6-OHDA group (i.e. the dose-response relationship was shifted to the right), while no change was observed in the sham group. Any changes in the dose-response relationships for cocaine and apomorphine were comparable in the 6-OHDA and sham group. The rate-decreasing effects were not altered in either group for any of the drugs. Upon sacrifice, dopamine (DA) was found to be significantly depleted in the accumbens, caudate and rest of brain of the 6-OHDA group. Levels of norepinephrine and serotonin were unaltered. These data suggest that central DA-containing neurons play a role in the discriminative stimulus properties of psychomotor stimulants in rats.     

Evidence for dissociable mechanisms of amphetamine-and stress-induced behavioral sensitization: effects of MK-801 and haloperidol pretreatment

The present study examined the ability of pretreatment with MK-801 or haloperidol to block the induction of behavioral sensitization to amphetamine challenge by repeated immobilization stress in male Sprague-Dawley rats. Fifteen minutes before each of ten 30-min restraint sessions, rats were administered saline, MK-801 (0.01, 0.10 or 0.25 mg/kg IP) or haloperidol (0.10 or 0.25 mg/kg IP). Control rats received the same injection regimen without restraint. An additional experiment examined the ability of MK-801 to block the induction of sensitization by repeatedd-amphetamine. In this experiment, rats were administered saline or MK-801 (0.25 mg/kg IP) 15 min before each of ten amphetamine injections (1.0 mg/kg IP, administered under the same regimen as immobilization stress). Four days after the final immobilization or amphetamine injection, rats were tested for locomotor response to novelty, saline andd-amphetamine (1.5 mg/kg IP). Exposure to repeated immobilization stress significantly enhanced the locomotor response to amphetamine challenge but not to saline challenge whether rats were pretreated with saline, MK-801 or haloperidol. Secondary analysis of dose effects in each pretreatment group revealed that at 0.25 mg/kg, repeated MK-801 in itself induced sensitization to the response to amphetamine in control rats and potentiated stress-induced sensitization in restrained rats. In contrast, the sensitization induced by repeated amphetamine was attenuated by MK-801 pretreatment. Neither dose of haloperidol affected the locomotor response to saline or amphetamine in control or stressed rats. These results indicate that the effects of MK-801 on the induction of sensitization are complex and suggest that amphetamine-and stress-induced behavioral sensitization may arise through different mechanisms.     

Effects of tryptophan deficiency on prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle in rats

Rationale Serotonin (5-HT) plays a key role in the pathophysiology of psychotic disorders, presumably through a modulation of dopamine (DA) transmission. Reduction of 5-HT signaling has been suggested to enhance dopaminergic responses in animal models of psychosis. An intriguing naturalistic strategy to reduce 5-HT brain content is afforded by the dietary restriction to its precursor, l-tryptophan (TRP). Objective We investigated the impact of a TRP-deficient diet in rats on the prepulse inhibition of the startle (PPI), a measure of sensorimotor gating which is typically impaired by psychotomimetic substances. Materials and methods After either short-term (6 h) or long-term (14 days) TRP deprivation, rats were tested for startle reflex and PPI. Moreover, we assessed the impact of both TRP deprivation regimens on PPI reduction induced by the psychotomimetic substance d-amphetamine (AMPH). Results Both TRP-deficient regimens failed to significantly affect PPI responses. However, chronic, but not short-term, TRP-deficient diet induced a significant sensitization to the effects of AMPH (1.25–2.5 mg/kg, subcutaneous). The enhanced predisposition to PPI disruption elicited by prolonged TRP deprivation was completely reversed 24 h after reinstatement of TRP in the diet, as well as pretreatment with antipsychotic drugs haloperidol (0.1 mg/kg, intraperitoneal) and clozapine (5 mg/kg, intraperitoneal), which exert their therapeutic action mostly through blockade of DA D₂ receptors. Conclusions The present results confirm and extend previous findings on the impact of serotonergic signaling in the modulation of DA transmission in schizophrenia and point to chronic TRP deprivation as a potential model of environmental manipulation that may produce a sensitization to psychotic-like symptoms induced by dopaminergic activation. Fabio Fadda and Roberto Stancampiano contributed equally to the study.     

Interaction between d-amphetamine and ethanol with respect to locomotion,stereotypies, ethanol sleeping time,and the kinetics of drug elimination

The interaction between d-amphetamine and ethanol with respect to locomotor activity, stereotyped behavior, and sleeping time was investigated in rats. Ethanol 0.8 g/kg i.p. enhanced and prolonged locomotor activity produced by d-amphetamine 1 mg/kg s.c. The increased motility after 5 mg/kg d-amphetamine was not influenced by alcohol 0.8 g/kg i.p. or 3.2 g/kg orally, but slightly protracted. Stereotyped head and paw movements as well as stereotyped licking, were distinctly strengthened and protracted by 3.2 g/kg ethanol orally. The modified d-amphetamine motility and stereotypies can be explained by alcohol-induced prolongation of the life of d-amphetamine. The effect is produced by alcohol's inhibition d-amphetamine p-hydroxylation in rat liver. After 3.2 g/kg ethanol i.p., the sleeping time of male rats amounted to 153 min. Simultaneous administration of 5 mg/kg d-amphetamine s.c. reduced the sleeping time to 84 min. This is obviously based on a central antagonism.     

The effects of pimozide and phenoxybenzamine pretreatments on amphetamine and apomorphine potentiation of the acoustic startle response in rats

A series of three experiments investigated the individual roles of neurons containing dopamine (DA) and norepinephrine (NE) in modulating the amplitude of the acoustic startle response (ASR) in rats. Experiment I investigated the effects of 0.1, 0.5, and 2.5 mg/kg pimozide or 5, 10, and 20 mg/kg phenoxybenzamine alone on startle amplitude. Experiments II–III investigated the effects of pretreatment with either 2.5 mg/kg pimozide or 10 mg/kg phenoxybenzamine on the potentiation of startleamplitude by either d-amphetamine (8 mg/kg), l-amphetamine (32 mg/kg), or apomorphine (3 mg/kg). Treatment with pimozide (2.5 mg/kg given 85 min before testing) and phenoxybenzamine (10 mg/kg, given 25 min before testing) resulted in a significant reduction in startle amplitude, supporting the conclusion that neurons containing NE and DA both tonically facilitate the ASR. The startlepotentiating effect of d- and l-amphetamine and apomorphine were totally blocked by pretreatment with pimozide (2.5 mg/kg, injected 2 h before these drugs), which supports the hypothesis that these agents potentiate startle at least in part by acting through dopaminergic neural systems. Phenoxybenzamine pretreatment (10 mg/kg, given 0.5 h before) also blocked the startle-potentiating effects of l-amphetamine and apomorphine, which suggests that noradrenergic neural systems are also involved in the potentiation of ASR by these agents, possibly through the interaction of dopaminergic and noradrenergic neural systems. The potentiating effect of d-amphetamine on ASR magnitude was not attenuated by phenoxybenzamine.     

Heritable differences in the dopaminergic regulation of sensorimotor gating

Sensorimotor gating, measured by prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the startle reflex, is reduced in schizophrenia patients and in rats treated with dopamine (DA) agonists. Strain and substrain differences in the sensitivity to the PPI-disruptive effects of DA agonists may provide insight into the basis for human population differences in sensorimotor gating. We have reported greater sensitivity to the PPI disruptive effects of the D₁/D₂ agonist apomorphine in Harlan Sprague-Dawley (SDH) versus Long Evans (LEH) rats. In the present study, we assessed the generational pattern of this phenotypic difference across parental SDH and LEH strains under in- and cross-fostering conditions, offspring (F1) of an SDH×LEH cross, and subsequent offspring (N2) of an SDH×F1 cross. Apomorphine sensitivity followed a gradient across generations that suggested relatively simple additive effects of multiple genes. Cross fostering studies confirmed that SDH>LEH apomorphine sensitivity did not reflect post-natal maternal influences. Generational patterns of PPI apomorphine sensitivity were not associated with albino versus hooded phenotypes per se, but apomorphine sensitivity in hooded N2 rats was strongly related to body surface area of fur pigmentation. The association between pigmentation and PPI apomorphine sensitivity may provide an important clue to specific biochemical and genetic substrates responsible for population differences in the regulation of sensorimotor gating.     

D1 and D2 dopamine receptor antagonists reverse prepulse inhibition deficits in an animal model of schizophrenia

The amplitude of the acoustic startle response is decreased if the startle stimulus is preceded by a nonstartle eliciting stimulus. This sensorimotor gating phenomenon, known as prepulse inhibition, is diminished in schizophrenic individuals. In rats, the dopamine agonist apomorphine disrupts prepulse inhibition and this disruption is reversed by classical and atypical antipsychotics. Furthermore, the ability of antipsychotics to reverse the apomorphine disruption is correlated with clinical potency and D₂ receptor affinity. In the present study, the role of the D₁ receptor in prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle response was studied; the effects of the D₁ receptor antagonist SCH 23390 were examined and compared to the effects of the D₂ receptor antagonist eticlopride. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were placed into a startle chamber and presented with auditory stimuli consisting of either 95 or 105 dB noise bursts presented alone or preceded by a 75 dB noise burst. Trials consisting of no stimulus and the 75 dB prepulse stimulus alone were also included. These six trial types (ten each) were randomly presented within a 35-min session. Rats treated with 2.0 mg/kg apomorphine (SC) demonstrated a significant disruption of prepulse inhibition compared to vehicle controls. Pretreatment with the D₁ antagonist SCH 23390 (0.01, 0.05, 0.1 mg/kg SC) or the D₂ antagonist eticlopride (0.01, 0.05, 0.1 mg/kg SC) attenuated the disruptive effects of apomorphine. These results indicate that selective blockade of either the D₁ or D₂ receptor subtype is sufficient in reversing the sensorimotor gating deficits produced by apomorphine. The effects of eticlopride and SCH 23390 on prepulse inhibition in saline-treated rats were also examined. Each antagonist produced a dose-related facilitation of prepulse inhibition, suggesting that endogenous DA acting at either receptor subtype plays a role in the tonic modulation of sensorimotor gating.