Current income profile for academic pediatric emergency medicine faculty.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To survey academic pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) programs for information on financial compensation and patient care activities of PEM faculty and compare the results to the financial data published by the AAEM, AAAP, and MGMA. METHODS: A survey was mailed to program directors requesting information on medical school affiliation, ED census, recruitment, patient care activity and annual income for each academic rank. The survey also included questions on CME benefits, and income adjustment mechanisms/bonus plans for PEM faculty. The survey income data were stratified by program size and geographic region and then compared to income data from the AAMC, AAAP, and MGMA. RESULTS: Of 47 eligible programs, 37 (78.7%) responded,and four were excluded. Mean number of clinical hours per week for academic faculty and clinical faculty were 27.9 +/- 3.5 and 32.4 +/- 3.9, respectively, (P = 0.000). Clinical appointments in academic departments were offered by 82% of the programs. Mean annual income for all academic ranks was $121,503 +/- $15,795, and is nearly $37,000 less than the annual income for academic adult emergency medicine (AEM) faculty. Compared to medium and large programs, small programs are offering higher salaries to recent fellowship graduates (P = 0.004). When income data were stratified by program size or geographic region, no significant difference in average annual income was observed. Bonus or incentive plans were available only in 45.5% of the programs. CONCLUSION: Direct patient care responsibility of PEM academic faculty has not changed significantly in the past 13 years, despite the availability of clinical appointments within most of the surveyed programs. Our data indicate that the annual income for PEM faculty in academic institutions is significantly less than AEM faculty. No significant difference was observed between programs at the assistant, associate, or full professor level when stratified by size or geographic region. Bonus/incentive plans for exceptional patient care or scholarly activity were available in less than half of the surveyed programs.     

The training of pediatric residents in the care of acutely ill and injured children

OBJECTIVES: To describe the current educational experience of pediatric residents in pediatric emergency care, to identify areas of variability between residency programs, and to distinguish areas in need of further improvement. DESIGN: A 63-item survey mailed to all accredited pediatric residency training program directors in the United States and Puerto Rico. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Pediatric residency programs and their directors. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary training settings, required and elective rotations related to the care of the acutely ill and injured child, supervision of care, procedural and technical training, and didactic curriculum in pediatric emergency medicine (PEM). RESULTS: One hundred fifty-three (72%) of 213 residency programs responded. One hundred nine (71%) were based at general or university hospitals, the remaining 44 (29%) were based at freestanding children's hospitals. Residents most commonly saw patients in pediatric emergency departments (54%), followed by acute care clinics (21%), general emergency departments (21%), and urgent care clinics (5%). The mean number of weeks of PEM training required was 11, but varied widely from 0 to 36 weeks. Forty programs (27%) required their residents to spend 4 or fewer weeks rotating in an emergency department setting. The best predictor of the number of weeks spent in emergency medicine was residency program size, with small programs requiring fewer weeks (7 weeks for small [1-8 postgraduate year 1 residents] vs 13 for medium [9-17 postgraduate year 1 residents] vs 15 for large [> or =18 postgraduate year 1 residents]). Pediatric surgery (18%), orthopedic (8%), anesthesia (6%), and toxicology (4%) rotations were rarely required. Ninety-two percent of the programs had 24-hour on-site attending physician coverage of the emergency department. Supervising physicians varied widely in their training and included PEM attendings and fellows, general emergency medicine attendings, and general pediatric attendings. Small programs were less likely to have PEM coverage (57% at small vs 95% at large) and more likely to have general emergency medicine coverage (79% at small vs 29% at large). Reported opportunities to perform procedures were uniformly high and did not differ by program size or affiliated fellowship. Residency program directors were uniformly confident in their residents' training in medical resuscitation, critical care, emergency care, airway management, and minor trauma. Thirty-seven percent of all respondents were not confident in their residents' training in major trauma. Most programs reported that they had a didactic PEM curriculum (77%), although the number of hours devoted to the lectures varied substantially. CONCLUSIONS: Wide variability exists in the amount of time devoted to emergency medicine within pediatric residency training curricula and in the training background of attendings used to supervise patient care and resident education. Nevertheless, pediatric residency training programs directors feel confident in their residents training in most topics related to PEM. Residents' training in major trauma resuscitation was the most frequently cited deficiency.     

Proposal for an administrative curriculum in pediatric emergency medicine fellowship training.

Administrative tasks make up a significant component of the practice of pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) physicians. Our survey of 10 academic pediatric emergency departments revealed that PEM physicians who are primarily clinical spent an average of 15% of their time on administrative tasks, and PEM physicians whose positions are administrative as well as clinical spent 30 to 60% of their time on administrative tasks. Of the 101 programs responding to our survey of 220 pediatric residency programs, 80% did not address hospital administrative issues, and many that did address these issues allowed these topics only one hour of presentation time per year. It is clear that there is a discrepancy between the demands placed upon PEM physicians to perform administrative tasks and the sparse or nonexistent opportunities for learning about administrative issues during residency training. It is incumbent upon pediatric emergency fellowship programs to provide an inclusive and well-structured administrative curriculum for their trainees. This article suggests a framework for such a curriculum.     

Practitioners of pediatric emergency medicine: a 5-year longitudinal study

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To describe the evolution of the responsibilities, goals and expectations of sub-Board-certified practitioners of pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) over a 5-year period. METHODS: This was a prospective, cohort study. A questionnaire was mailed in January 1994 to all physicians sub-Board-certified in PEM by either the American Board of Pediatrics or the American Board of Emergency Medicine. It included questions about the type of work the physicians did and expectations for the future. This group of physicians was surveyed again in January 1999. The primary outcome measures were changes in the physicians' goals and expectations for the future. Table. RESULTS: Questionnaires were mailed to 232 PEM sub-Board-certified physicians in January 1994. By June 1994, 183 of the 232 responded to the survey. Follow-up questionnaires were mailed to the cohort of 183 physicians in January 1999. By June 1999, 170 of the 183 (93%) had replied. The table summarizes results. In 1994, the most commonly listed career goals were to increase research productivity (52%) and develop excellent teaching skills (35%). In 1999, the most commonly listed goals were to improve hours/lifestyle (61%) and increase administrative work (33%). CONCLUSION: The priorities of this cohort of PEM sub-Board-certified physicians have changed as the physicians grow older. Lifestyle issues must be taken into consideration to ensure longevity in the subspecialty.     

Emergency physician perspectives on child passenger safety: a national survey of attitudes and practices

ObjectiveTo understand attitudes and self-reported practices of pediatric and general emergency physicians regarding child passenger safety.MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional mailed national survey of 600 pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) physicians and 600 emergency medicine (EM) physicians who provide clinical care in the United States randomly sampled from the American Medical Association Physician Masterfile. Survey questions explored attitudes related to the role of the physician and the emergency department (ED) in child passenger safety and self-reported frequency of performing specific child passenger safety practices.ResultsResponses were received from 638 of 1000 (64%) eligible physicians with a valid mailing address. Surveys were completed by 367 PEM and 271 EM physicians. Regardless of their training background, emergency physicians overwhelmingly agreed that it is their role to educate parents about child passenger safety (95% PEM vs 82% EM) and that they can make a difference in how parents restrain their child (92% PEM vs 93% EM). Physicians were similar in their views that the most appropriate person to provide child passenger safety information in their ED was a nurse/midlevel provider followed by a physician. Self-report of child passenger safety practices in response to 2 hypothetical scenarios showed physicians infrequently provide best-practice safety recommendations to families.ConclusionsEmergency physicians are supportive of the ED as a setting to promote child passenger safety, yet do not consistently promote child passenger safety themselves. Differences between PEM and EM physicians’ attitudes toward child passenger safety may necessitate different approaches on injury prevention in general and pediatric EDs.     

Oral versus intravenous: rehydration preferences of pediatric emergency medicine fellowship directors

OBJECTIVE: The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) recommends oral rehydration therapy (ORT) for management of uncomplicated childhood gastroenteritis with mild-moderate dehydration. However, ORT is widely underused relative to their recommendations. We compared ORT use by directors of Pediatric Emergency Medicine (PEM) fellowship training programs with AAP recommendations, and sought to identify their barriers to ORT. METHODS: Mail/fax survey of the directors of U.S. and Canadian PEM fellowship programs. The survey included 10 scenarios of mild or moderately dehydrated children with gastroenteritis, a personal innovativeness scale, self-assessment of ORT experience and knowledge, and open-ended questions regarding perceived barriers to ORT use. RESULTS: 60/67 (89.6%) PEM fellowship program directors responded. All reported experience with and knowledge about ORT. Only 10/58 (17.2%) believe ORT is usually better than intravenous (i.v.) rehydration in all 10 clinical scenarios, and only 4/58 (6.7%) usually use ORT in all 10 scenarios. 18/58 (31%) usually use ORT for all mildly but no moderately dehydrated children. ORT use did not correlate with personal innovativeness scores. Important barriers cited by respondents include additional time requirements for ORT relative to i.v. rehydration (76.7%) and expectation of i.v. rehydration by parents (41.7%) or primary care physicians (10%). CONCLUSIONS: Relative to AAP recommendations, PEM fellowship directors underuse ORT, especially for moderately dehydrated children. Physician innovativeness does not influence ORT use. Further study of effectiveness, length of stay, staff requirements, and ORT acceptance in the emergency department setting, especially in children with moderate dehydration, may influence ORT use.     

Management of febrile infants and children by pediatric emergency medicine and emergency medicine: comparison with practice guidelines

OBJECTIVES: Management of febrile infants and children remains controversial despite the 1993 publication in Pediatrics and Annals of Emergency Medicine of practice guidelines. Our aim was to determine the management of febrile infants and children by pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) fellowship directors and emergency medicine (EM) residency directors and compare their approach with the published practice guidelines. METHODS: Four case scenarios were sent to 64 PEM directors and 100 EM directors in the United States and Canada, describing four febrile, nontoxic infants and children aged 25 days (case 1), 7 weeks (case 2), 5 months (case 3), and 22 months (case 4). Respondents were asked to select which laboratory tests and radiographs they would obtain and to decide on treatment and disposition for each hypothetical case. RESULTS: Ninety-two percent (53/64) of PEM directors and 64% (64/100) of EM directors responded (overall response rate 74%). Compliance with the guidelines (PEM/EM) was 54%/16% for case 1, 31%/6% for case 2, 35%/19% for case 3, and 20%/11% for case 4. Only 11% of PEM and 2% of EM directors followed the guidelines for all four cases. Overall, directors performed fewer laboratory tests, ordered more chest radiographs and treated fewer patients with antibiotics than the expert panel suggested. EM directors ordered more chest radiographs (cases 1-4) and admitted more patients (case 2) than PEM directors. CONCLUSIONS: There is poor compliance with published practice guidelines in the management of febrile infants and children among PEM and EM directors.     

Are carbon dioxide detectors useful in neonates?

Maintenance of neonatal normocarbia may prevent chronic lung disease and periventricular leucomalacia, but this requires frequent arterial sampling, which has risks. Alternative methods for measuring CO2 are therefore desirable. These include end tidal CO2, capillary sampling, and transcutaneous measurements. CO2 detectors have also proved effective and rapid indicators of endotracheal intubation. However, this method relies on the presence of exhaled CO2, which may be reduced in certain situations, such as cardiopulmonary arrest. Colorimetric CO2 detectors are therefore valuable adjuncts for airway management, especially during resuscitation, but Pa(CO2) is still the best measure of CO2 in neonatal practice.     

End-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring in pediatric emergencies

End-tidal carbon dioxide (CO2) monitoring is useful in the prehospital setting, emergency department, intensive care unit, and operating room. Capnography provides valuable, timely information about the function of both the cardiovascular and respiratory systems. End-tidal CO2 monitoring is the single most useful method in confirming endotracheal tube position. It also provides information about dead space, cardiac output, and airway resistance. A thorough understanding of cardiopulmonary physiology and the technical nuances of capnometry is required for its optimal use in children. This review examines the basic physiology pertinent to end-tidal CO2 monitoring, its clinical applications, and evidence supporting its use in infants and children.     

Reported Knowledge and Management of Potential Penicillin Allergy in Children

BackgroundPediatric emergency medicine (PEM) and primary care provider (PCP) providers are the most likely physicians to initially label a child as allergic to penicillin. Differences in knowledge and management of reported penicillin allergy between these 2 groups have not been well characterized.MethodsA cross-sectional, 20-question survey was administered to PEM and PCPs to ascertain differential knowledge and management of penicillin allergy. Knowledge regarding high- and low-risk symptoms for true allergy and extent of history taking regarding allergy were compared between the 2 groups using t tests, Chi-square, and Wilcoxon tests.ResultsIn total, 182 PEM and 54 PCPs completed the survey. PEM and PCPs reported that 74.1 ± 19.5% and 69.0 ± 23.8% of patients with remote low-risk symptoms of allergy could tolerate penicillin without an allergic reaction. PEM and PCPs incorrectly identified low-risk symptoms of allergy as high-risk, including vomiting with medication administration and delayed skin rash. PCPs took more detailed allergy histories when compared with PEM providers. In total, 143 (78.5%) of PEM providers and 51 (94.4%) PCPs were interested in using a penicillin allergy questionnaire to segregate children into high- or low-risk categories.ConclusionsMost pediatric providers believe that children with a remote history of low-risk allergy symptoms could tolerate penicillin without an allergic reaction; however, this is infrequently acted upon. Both PEM and PCP providers were likely to classify low-risk symptoms as high-risk and infrequently referred children for further detailed allergy assessment. Both groups were receptive to decision support measures to facilitate improved penicillin allergy classification and labeling and support antibiotic appropriateness in their patients.     

Metered-dose inhaler: the emergency department orphan.

OBJECTIVE: Physicians providing emergency department care to children primarily use nebulizers for the delivery of bronchodilators and these physicians have misconceptions regarding the advantages and disadvantages of using metered-dose inhalers (MDIs) with a spacer (MDI + S) for acute asthma exacerbations. DESIGN: Self-administered mail survey. SETTING: Emergency department. PARTICIPANTS: Emergency medicine section members of the American Academy of Pediatrics and Canadian Pediatric Society. INTERVENTIONS: Bronchodilator delivery methods in acute pediatric asthma. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The 2 principal outcomes for bivariate analysis were self-reported nebulizer use in all patients and MDI + S use in patients with mild acute asthma. RESULTS: Of eligible physicians, 333 (51%) of 567 responded. The majority were dual trained in pediatrics and pediatric emergency medicine (72%) and practiced full time (83%) in an urban (83%) pediatric emergency department (80%). The most commonly cited advantages of MDIs were their cost (33%) and speed of use (28%). The most commonly cited disadvantages were patient or parent dissatisfaction (24%) and relative ease of nebulizer use (23%). Only 10% to 21% of participants used MDIs in the emergency department and reserved this delivery method for children with mild asthma exacerbations. There were no significant associations between selected respondent demographic variables and the use of MDIs. CONCLUSIONS: Misconceptions regarding the efficacy and safety of MDI + S for the treatment of acute asthma exacerbations exist but are limited to a minority of surveyed emergency medicine physicians caring for children. Nebulizers remain the preferred method of routine bronchodilator delivery by physicians providing care to pediatric asthmatics in the emergency department.     

Pediatric emergency medicine fellowships: a survey

A survey of 24 existing pediatric emergency medicine fellowship programs as of December 1987 was conducted in order to characterize the following attributes of training in pediatric emergency medicine: amount of clinical time, required and elective rotations, didactic and research experience, patient volume, and staffing. Time spent in the emergency department varies between three and 10 months annually, with a mean of 34.5 hours per week. Twenty-two (92%) of the programs have required rotations. All responding programs require research and some degree of didactic education. Patient volume varies between 20,000 and 70,000, with a median of 41,000. The data offered should act as a reference for the further development of new and existing programs.     

Prophylaxis against possible human immunodeficiency virus exposure after nonoccupational needlestick injuries or sexual assaults in children and adolescents

BACKGROUND: Nonoccupational human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) for adults has been described, although the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Ga, offer no specific recommendations. There is limited information about its use in children and adolescents. OBJECTIVE: To describe the current practices of physicians in pediatric infectious disease (PID) and pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) departments regarding nonoccupational HIV PEP for children and adolescents. DESIGN: Survey. PARTICIPANTS: Directors of all PID and PEM departments with fellowship programs in the United States and Canada between July and November 1998. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: General questions regarding HIV PEP and questions concerning 2 scenarios (5-year-old with a needlestick injury and a 15-year-old after sexual assault). RESULTS: The return rate was 67 (78%) of 86 for PID and 36 (75%) of 48 for PEM physicians. Fewer than 20% of physicians reported institutional policies for nonoccupational HIV PEP; 33% had ever initiated nonoccupational HIV PEP. In both scenarios, PID physicians were more likely than PEM physicians to recommend or offer HIV PEP in the first 24 hours after the incident (55 [83%] of 66 vs 20 [56%] of 36 for needlestick injuries [odds ratio, 4.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.6-10.1] and 47 [72%] of 65 vs 16 [50%] of 32 for sexual assault [odds ratio, 2.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-6.3]). Seven different antiretroviral agents in single, dual, or triple drug regimens administered for 2 to 12 weeks were suggested. CONCLUSIONS: Although few physicians reported institutional policies, and only one third had ever initiated HIV PEP, many would offer or recommend HIV PEP for children and adolescents within 24 hours after possible HIV exposure. A wide variation of regimens have been suggested. There is a need for a national consensus for nonoccupational HIV PEP.     

Neonatal resuscitation: review of ventilation equipment and survey of practice in Australia and New Zealand

OBJECTIVE: The equipment used to provide positive pressure ventilation at neonatal resuscitation varies between institutions. Available devices were reviewed and their use surveyed in a geographically defined region. The aim of this study was to establish which resuscitation equipment is used at neonatal intensive care units in Australia and New Zealand. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to a neonatologist at each of the 29 neonatal intensive care units in Australia and New Zealand, asking which resuscitation equipment they used. If it was not returned, follow up was by email and telephone. RESULTS: Data was obtained from all units. Round face masks are used at all centres. Anatomically shaped masks are infrequently used at two of the three centres (10%) that have them. Straight endotracheal tubes are used exclusively at 23 (79%) centres. Shouldered tubes are used infrequently at three of the six centres that have them. The Laerdal Infant Resuscitator self-inflating bag is used at 22 (76%) centres. Flow-inflating bags are used at 12 (41%) centres. The Neopuff Infant Resuscitator is used at 14 (48%) centres. Varying oxygen concentrations are provided at delivery at 6/25 (24%) centres. CONCLUSIONS: There is a paucity of evidence for the efficacy of the equipment used currently to resuscitate newborn infants. This complete survey of the tertiary centres in a geographical region shows considerable variation in practice, reflecting this lack of evidence and consequent uncertainty among clinicians. Further research is necessary to determine which devices are preferable for this most important and common intervention.     

Pediatric emergency medicine fellowship training in the new millennium

OBJECTIVE Fellowship training in pediatric emergency medicine has been available since the early 1980s. Its availability increased rapidly in the late 1980s and early 1990s, but its growth has been much slower in recent years. In this report, we characterize and compare the training programs of today to those that existed 10 years ago. Our study deals with program content and design, focusing on five aspects of fellowship training: demographics, curriculum, clinical emergency department time, research, and benefits. The data gathered in this study are meant to assist programs, both new and old, in enhancing their fellowship training.METHODS A 43-question survey was mailed to all known pediatric emergency medicine fellowship program directors in March of 2000. Two additional attempts were made to obtain survey responses. Forty of the 50 program directors responded, for a response rate of 80%. Statistical analysis was performed, and the data were compared with data that were gathered in two previous studies of fellowship training programs conducted in 1988 and 1991.RESULTS Fellowship training in pediatric emergency medicine continues to grow but at a slower pace than previously experienced. The number of training programs has increased by 27% over the past 10 years; however, the number of first-year positions has only increased by 15%. Clinical fellow supervision has increased significantly over the years, likely as a result of changes in reimbursement. In 1990, 75% of fellows worked unsupervised in the emergency department versus 23% of first-year fellows, 56% of second-year fellows, and 74% of third-year fellows in the year 2000. The structure of the fellowship curriculum has become more standardized during the past 10 years, with numerous core rotations required by most programs. The percentage of programs offering protected research time has changed significantly over the years, with the amount of time increasing from 40% in 1988, to 95% in 1990, to 100% in 2000. The amount of clinical time has also increased with the transition to a 3-year program.CONCLUSIONS Pediatric emergency medicine continues to expand as a pediatric subspecialty but at a slower rate. During the previous decade, fellowship training has become more structured, with greater emphasis being placed on fellow supervision, standardization of education, and research. These data are meant to assist new as well as established fellowship programs with the development of their training curriculum.     

Sedation, analgesia, and neuromuscular blockade in the pediatric intensive care unit: survey of fellowship training programs.

OBJECTIVE: To survey current sedation, analgesia, and neuromuscular blockade practices in pediatric critical care fellowship training programs in the United States. DESIGN: Questionnaire survey sent by all program directors. The survey could be submitted either via a Web site, fax, or mail. SETTING: University school of medicine. SUBJECTS: Fifty-nine pediatric critical care fellowship training program directors in the United States, listed on the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Web site. INTERVENTIONS: Survey. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The response rate was 59.3% (35 questionnaires). Midazolam, lorazepam, morphine, and fentanyl are the most frequently used drugs in pediatric intensive care units for analgesia and sedation. Most pediatric intensive care units surveyed have a written sedation policy (66%). The majority of units responding to the survey (85.7%) routinely use a scoring system to assess agitation and pain in children, with the most common being the COMFORT score. All of the pediatric intensive care units surveyed reported weaning drugs slowly to try to prevent drug withdrawal. Movement disorders related to prolonged sedation and analgesia seem to be more common than is reported in the literature, with 65.7% of units reporting cases. There is good consensus on the indications for neuromuscular blockade, with vecuronium being the most popular drug. CONCLUSIONS: When compared with a similar survey from 1989, this survey suggests that pediatric critical care units with fellowship training programs have made some changes in their approach to sedation and analgesia over the past decade. More fellowship directors report the use of sedation protocols and better recognition, prevention, and management of drug withdrawal. Similar analgesic, sedative, and neuromuscular blocking drugs are being used but some more commonly than a decade ago.     

Survey of neonatal respiratory support strategies

AIM: To survey current practice regarding neonatal respiratory support strategies to determine whether it reflected evidence from randomised trials. METHODS: A questionnaire (in Supplementary Material online) survey of all U.K. neonatal units was undertaken to determine what modes of ventilation, types of endotracheal tube, lung function monitoring and oxygen saturation levels were used. RESULTS: There was an 80% response rate. Most (73%) units used in prematurely born infants (in the first 24 h) the intermittent positive pressure ventilation, and other respiratory modes included: CPAP (2%), triggered ventilation with or without volume guarantee (22%) and high frequency oscillation (2%). Only 15% of units used assist control mode for weaning; the preferred weaning mode was synchronous intermittent mandatory ventilation (73%). Few units used shouldered endotracheal tubes (3%) or lung function measurements (25%) to aid choice of ventilator settings. Oxygen saturation levels from 80% to 98% were used, levels greater or equal to 95% were used by 11% of units for infants with acute respiratory disease but by 34% of units for BPD infants (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Many practitioners do not base their choice of neonatal respiratory support strategies on the results of large randomised trials; more effective methods are required to ensure evidence-based practice.     

Disposable colorimetric carbon dioxide detector use as an indicator of a patent airway during noninvasive mask ventilation

Colorimetric carbon dioxide detectors are useful indicators of proper endotracheal tube placement. We have found that they also are helpful during bag and mask ventilation as an indicator of a patent airway. In this report, we describe our experience with these devices for use during preintubation airway stabilization as observed during videotaped performances from a prospective, randomized trial of intubation premedication.