Immunoglobulin isotype-specific characterization of anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies eluted from explanted renal allografts

To evaluate the immunoglobulin isotypes of anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies harbored in rejected renal allografts, we isolated proteins by acid elution accumulated in 94 rejected and explanted kidneys and characterized their antibody specificities by complement-dependent cytotoxicity, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and flow cytometry (Luminex) techniques. In addition, we differentially analyzed non-complement-binding immunolglobulin (Ig) G2/4 and IgA1/2 antibodies in the eluates using two modified solid phase assays. We found non-complement-binding IgG2 and IgG4 antibodies in 16/58 (28%) of the IgGall-positive eluates, 15 eluates with anti-HLA class I and 4 with anti-HLA class II specificities, respectively. Anti-HLA class I IgG2/4 antibodies directed against the donor were found in 7 eluates (54% of the IgG2/4-pos. eluates), whereas 2 eluates (50%) had class II IgG2/4 antibodies directed against the donor. IgA1/2 antibodies could be detected in 9 eluates (16%); 5 of them had anti-HLA class I and 5 anti-HLA class II antibodies. We could clearly exhibit that explanted kidney allografts harbor anti-HLA antibodies. Moreover, our study demonstrates that non-complement-binding anti-HLA antibodies accumulate in rejected renal allografts.     

Good kidney transplant outcome in recipients with presensitization against HLA class II but not HLA class I

It is a matter of debate whether pretransplant anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class II antibodies contribute to the increased graft rejection rate found in presensitized recipients. We investigated the influence of preformed anti-HLA class II antibodies on graft survival in 5949 cadaver kidney transplants. Pretransplant recipient sera were tested in enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for immunoglobulin (Ig)G-anti-HLA class I and IgG-anti-HLA class II antibodies. A total of 672 recipients with antibodies against HLA class II but not against HLA class I had a 3-year graft survival rate of 80 +/- 2%, identical to the 80 +/- 1% rate in 4561 recipients who were negative for anti-HLA class I and II (p = NS). Graft survival was significantly lower in 365 recipients who were positive for both anti-HLA class I and II (65 +/- 3%, p < 0.0001). Compatibility for HLA-A+B+DR influenced graft survival significantly in anti-HLA class I- and II-positive recipients (p = 0.0016), whereas no significant HLA effect was found in patients with antibodies directed against only class I or II. Surprisingly, not even incompatibility for HLA class II antigens of the DR locus caused a significant impairment of graft survival in anti-class II-positive recipients. We conclude that the risk associated with sensitization against HLA class II in the absence of sensitization against HLA class I is negligible.     

A limited number of HLA epitopes are recognized from HLA class I-specific antibodies detected in the serum of sensitized patients

The goal of this study was to evaluate the epitope specificity of HLA class I-specific antibodies detected in the serum of sensitized patients awaiting retransplantation. The study group consisted of 22 sensitized from previous graft patients, who produced stable IgG HLA class I-specific antibodies. A total of 60 serum samples were screened and analyzed by two techniques in parallel: the antihuman globulin augmented CDC (AHG-CDC) technique and an ELISA technique. All recipients and donors were typed for class I HLA antigens by a standard lymphocytotoxicity technique. The epitope identification was based on class I HLA antigens sequencing, where the multiple immunogenic epitopes are differentially shared among various HLA antigens. The unique epitope configuration on one HLA antigen represents the private epitope of the specific HLA antigen while epitopes shared by more than one HLA antigen represent public determinants. In some HLA antigens (HLA-A1), more than one private epitope has been defined, while in others (HLA-B35, -B51), the private epitopes are not yet known. In a total of 36 antibody reactivity patterns, the majority of the definable IgG HLA class I-specific antibodies corresponded to the A-locus (75%), and only 25% had specificities against the B-locus antigens, although the number of incompatibilities concerning both loci were almost identical (29 for the HLA antigens of the A-locus and 26 for those of B-locus). All patients produced HLA class I-specific antibodies with specificities against the private epitopes of the immunogenic mismatched HLA antigen(s). In 6/21 cases (28.6%), HLA class I alloreactivity spreading to nongraft HLA antigens was detected and 9 public (shared) immunogenic alloepitopes were recognized. In conclusion, appling the epitope analysis of HLA class I-specific antibodies produced by sensitized from previous graft patients, we were able to define the immunogenic alloepitopes. We consider that the immunogenic alloepitopes, during transplantation course, are mainly private epitopes of mismatched HLA antigens and, in certain cases, shared epitopes between the donor alloantigens and other HLA antigens. This knowledge may offer the potential of transplanting sensitized patients through improved donor selection.     

A broad and strong humoral immune response to donor HLA after implantation of cryopreserved human heart valve allografts

Cryopreserved human heart valves are used for valve replacement in patients with congenital or acquired heart disease. Although no blood group or human leukocyte antigens (HLA) matching is performed and no immunosuppression is administered, the clinical results are relatively good. After valve replacement, the majority of the patients develop HLA antibodies, whereas a smaller group of patients shows valve-related events at the long term after right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction. Therefore, we hypothesized that not the mere presence, but rather the titers of antidonor HLA antibodies may be related to valve allograft failure. The presence and specificity of HLA class I antibodies were determined by complement-dependent microlymphocytotoxicity (CDC) test in longitudinally taken peripheral blood samples of 35 valve allograft recipients. In eight patients with an antibody response specific against donor-HLA class I, the titers were measured by this CDC method after stepwise dilution of the plasma. Panel reactive antibodies of more than 10% were found in 31 of 35 (89%) valve allograft recipients. From these 31 patients, 24 (77%) developed donor-specific HLA class I antibodies. All eight selected patients had detectable donor-specific antibody titers, ranging from 1:2 to 1:8,000. Two donor valve recipients before retransplantation had (donor-specific) HLA antibodies and showed high titers of 1:256 and 1:8,000 shortly after the second allograft valve replacement, which was associated with an early graft failure in the latter patient. We conclude that transplantation of cryopreserved human heart valve allografts leads to a broad and strong humoral response, which is probably the result of a lack of immunosuppressive therapy after valve transplantation. Patients receiving a second or following valve allograft appeared to be sensitized and developed early and high allo-antibody titers after second valve allograft implantation. Valve failure was diagnosed in a patient with extremely high titers. These findings suggest that preoperative cross-matching may identify patients with high donor-specific HLA antibody titers and may reduce the risk for early recurrent graft failure.     

Donor-specific sensitization by cadaveric venous allografts used for arterial reconstruction in peripheral arterial occlusive vascular disease

The use of allogeneic venous grafts from postmortal organ donors allows for the reconstruction of critically affected arteries in patients with peripheral occlusive vascular disease. We were interested to determine the prevalence and specificity of anti-HLA antibodies in patients after allogeneic vein transplantation. Anti-HLA class I and II alloantibodies were analyzed by flowcytometric analysis using color-coded microbeads coated with HLA antigens including recombinant single antigens. Nine out of 10 patients involving 12 venous allografts were positive for anti-HLA alloantibodies. All antibody-positive patients carried both anti-HLA class I and II alloantibodies. Anti-donor HLA specificity of the anti-HLA alloantibodies was seen in seven out of nine patients for anti-class I antibodies and in eight out of nine patients for anti-HLA class II antibodies. A high rate of donor-specific allosensitization was seen after allogeneic venous transplantation. In conclusion, allosensitization not only includes a humoral response against the constitutively expressed class I antigens but also extends to class II antigens.     

Post transplant development of MICA and anti-HLA antibodies is associated with acute rejection episodes and renal allograft loss

This study was undertaken with the primary aim of analyzing the clinical relevance of posttransplant appearance of anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) and major histocompatibility (MHC) class I related chain A (MICA) antibodies in response to live related donor (LRD) renal transplantation. A total of 185 consecutive post renal transplant recipient serum samples were analyzed for the detection of anti-HLA by enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay (ELISA) and MICA antibodies using Luminex techniques. Patients with IgG HLA class I antibodies had more acute rejection episodes compared to the negative group (67% vs. 20%, chi(2) = 7.95, p = 0.005) and also had poor graft survival (44% vs 86%, chi(2) = 6.67, p = 0.01). Similarly, patients with anti-HLA class II antibodies also had significantly lower graft survival and a higher number of rejection episodes as compared to the antibody negative group (p = 0.002 and p = 0.000, respectively). Following transplantation, 30 patients (16%) developed antibodies against any of the MICA alleles (MICA*001, MICA*002, MICA*004, MICA*008, or MIC*009). The graft survival was significantly compromised in these patients as compared to the negative group (60% vs 86%, chi(2) = 10.26, p = 0.001). Further, patients carrying both antibodies (MICA+/HLA+) were the worst affected and showed significantly poor graft survival as compared to the MICA-/HLA- group (17% vs 89%, chi(2) = 19.63, p = 0.000). Similarly, patients with only MICA antibodies or those with only HLA antibodies also had significantly lower graft survival and a higher number of acute rejection episodes (p = 0.035 and p = 0.001, respectively) as compared to the nonsensitized group. The study illustrates that posttransplant monitoring of antibodies to both MICA as well as HLA could be an important prognostic marker in renal transplant subjects.     

Impact of HLA-C and Bw epitopes disparity on liver transplantation outcome

The occurrence of graft rejection episodes after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) despite the use of immunosuppressive drugs designed to suppress T lymphocyte functions, indicates the involvement of other types of cells in this process. The activity of natural killer cells and their killer immunoglobulin-like receptors (KIR) is regulated by human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I determinants; C and Bw epitopes. Because recipient/donor pairs are usually HLA mismatched, recipient natural killer alloreactivity may be the mediating factor in rejection. In this retrospective study, we have analyzed rejection occurrence and outcome in 66 OLT recipients, 42 with and 24 without C or Bw epitope disparity in the rejection direction. Recipients transplanted from donors with no C epitope disparity had significantly fewer rejection episodes in the first year after transplantation compared with recipients transplanted across C epitope disparity (p = 0.0002). Moreover, this effect was more pronounced when the outcome was analyzed in OLT recipients across negative crossmatching for the anti-HLA class I and II antibodies. In contrast, Bw epitope disparity did not affect the outcome. In conclusion, C epitopes disparity between recipients and donors in the rejection direction appears to influence posttransplant liver outcome. This finding may be helpful in the choice of appropriate liver donor and planning immune suppression.     

Influence of HLA disparity, immunosuppressive regimen used, and type of kidney allograft on production of anti-HLA class-I antibodies after transplant and occurrence of rejection

We studied the effects of HLA disparity, immunosuppressive regimen used, and the type of kidney allograft on production of anti-HLA antibodies after transplant and the occurrence of rejection episodes. Five living-unrelated donors and 4 living-related donors kidney recipients received quadruple therapy (including sirolimus and mycophenolate mofetil). Fifteen living-unrelated donors and 19 living-related donors received triple therapy (excluding sirolimus). A single bolus of 4 to 6 mg/kg rabbit anti-human T-lymphocyte immune serum was included with both regimens. Recipients were studied over a 3-year period. Human leukocyte antigen profiles were determined by DNA (SSP) typing, and anti-HLA class-I antibodies were determined by the complement-dependent microcytotoxicity assay and an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The degree of HLA disparity did not appear to affect anti-HLA antibody production or the occurrences of rejection episodes. None of the patients who received quadruple therapy developed anti-HLA class-I antibodies. Two living-unrelated donors and 2 living-related donors recipients who received triple therapy developed anti-HLA class-I antibodies. One of the 2 living-unrelated donors antibody-positive patients rejected the kidney and returned to dialysis, and the other patient has normal graft function 3 years after the transplant. The 2 living-related donors patients with normal graft function were antibody-positive 1 year after the transplant but were antibody-negative at 2 and 3 years after transplant. Sirolimus appeared to inhibit production of antibodies after transplant. Moreover, use of present day immunosuppressive agents diminishes the role of HLA matching in relation to the occurrence of rejection episodes.     

Prevalence and specificity of immunoglobulin G and immunoglobulin A non-complement-binding anti-HLA alloantibodies in retransplant candidates

The role of complement-binding donor-directed anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies in graft rejection is well established, whereas the prevalence and relevance of non-complement-binding (NCB) anti-HLA antibodies are less well defined. The aim of our study was to establish a sensitive and reliable test system for the detection and the specification of these NCB anti-HLA antibodies. Sera from 60 patients awaiting retransplantation were analysed for the presence of anti-HLA class I alloantibodies with complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) tests. Immunoglobulin (Ig)G(all) anti-HLA class I and class II alloantibodies were differentiated on generic level by plate-based solid phase enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Subsequently, a modified bead-based (Luminex) assay was applied, allowing the investigation of IgG(2/4) NCB isotypes as well as IgA(1/2). The anti-HLA specificities of the NCB alloantibodies were determined and compared with known mismatches from previous transplants. Seventeen of the 60 sera (28%) were positive in the CDC increasing to 26 of 60 (43%) in the class I and 33 of 60 (55%) in the class II plate-based assay. Using the modified bead-based system 24 of 60 sera (40%) contained NCB IgG(2/4), which were mostly donor specific. In addition, a high prevalence of NCB IgA antibodies was detected (26 of 60 sera), which occurred independently of IgG(2/4) NCB, and half of which were donor specific. NCB anti-HLA alloantibodies, including the IgA isotype, can reliably be detected using the modified bead-based test system. These NCB alloantibodies had a high prevalence in retransplant candidates and were mostly donor specific.     

Xenogeneic recognition of soluble and cell surface HLA class II antigens by proliferative murine T cells

In order to characterize the murine anti-human xenogeneic mixed lymphocyte reactions (MLR), we studied T cell proliferative responses against various human lymphoid cells by immunization of mice either with cellular or purified HLA-DR antigens. Data presented here indicated that small amounts of soluble HLA-DR antigen were able to prime mice, and that the xenogeneic MLR depends on the expression of HLA class II antigens on the stimulating cells. Experiments using a mutant cell line clearly showed that HLA-DP molecules were also sufficient in eliciting a primary or a secondary xenogeneic MLR while no secondary proliferative response was obtained with cells expressing only HLA class I molecules. Using a large panel of human cells with various haplotypes, our results also showed that (a) nonpolymorphic determinants of HLA class II antigens trigger dominantly the murine T cells and (b) the xenogeneic response required I-E and L3T4 accessory molecules and was not inhibited with anti I-A and monomorphic anti-HLA class II antigen monoclonal antibodies. Altogether these results suggest that HLA class II antigens act as nominal antigens in triggering a murine anti-human proliferative response.     

A high proportion of sera of heroin addicts possesses anti-HLA class I and class II reactivity

The anti-HLA reactivity of sera from 210 heroin addicts was tested by the direct binding with 125I-labeled preparations of HLA class I and class II molecules purified from human B-cell lines of various HLA haplotypes. A high proportion (81.7%) of the sera tested possessed anti-HLA class I and II reactivity. The reactivity did not show any allospecificity and was apparently mediated by antibodies. The control included 100 healthy blood donors, 25 male homosexuals positive for anti-HIV (human immunodeficiency virus) antibodies, and 25 patients positive for HBsAg (hepatitis B surface antigen). Of these controls, only one of the healthy blood donors was positive for anti-HLA reactivity (P much less than 0.001). Among heroin addicts, the reactivity was independent of the presence of either HBsAg or anti-HIV antibodies in the serum.     

A novel ELISA-based crossmatch procedure to detect donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies responsible for corneal allograft rejections

Previous studies had shown that donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies may highly influence the survival rate of corneal allografts, although the anterior chamber generally represents an immune-privileged compartment of the eye. We postulated that the introduction of a novel crossmatch procedure for the detection of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies in recipients awaiting a corneal graft would be adequate to investigate their influence on the outcome of the graft survival. The Antibody Monitoring System (AMS) HLA class I & II crossmatch ELISA was adapted for the use of material from the outer scleral rim instead of blood lymphocytes to isolate the donors' HLA molecules. In case of detectable donor-specific anti-HLA class I and/or class II antibodies (DSA) this result was confirmed using an identification ELISA to specify the detectable recipient's anti-HLA antibodies. PCR-based genetic tissue typing of the donors was performed also using their outer scleral rims. 45 recipients of corneal grafts were analyzed for DSA prior to or after grafting, respectively. 75% of the recipients with preformed DSA exhibited immunological complications up to the complete graft loss in four cases during the first two months. In contrast 77% of the recipients without DSA did not show any complications during the follow up period of averagely 18months. Only two cases of graft loss were observed in this group after 17 and 23months, respectively. The results demonstrate the impact of preventing donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies which are for the first time reliably detectable in any laboratory's daily work using the adapted AMS-ELISA.     

Shared cadaver donor-husband HLA class I mismatches as a risk factor for renal graft rejection in previously pregnant women

During the last few years, we have observed four cases in which accelerated rejection of a cadaver donor kidney in a previously pregnant woman could be clearly attributed to the rapid emergence of anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies that had been stimulated by mismatched paternal antigens but were completely undetectable at the time of transplantation. In addition to reviewing those cases, we also reviewed data on 19 other women with a history of at least one pregnancy who underwent transplantation with a first cadaveric kidney since 1991 and were followed for at least six months. The HLA antigens of the husbands had to have been determined and all accelerated rejection or early graft losses due to confirmed or presumed immunological causes were considered. Of the 19 additional women meeting these inclusion criteria, three suffered early immunological graft loss. As in our index cases, two of these women had also received kidneys from donors who shared at least one major immunogenic mismatched antigen with the respective husband for a total of six of seven women with early immunological graft loss. Only one of the 16 women without accelerated rejection or early immunological graft loss had a donor who shared a mismatched antigen with her husband. The difference between the two groups is statistically significant (p = 0.0005). These findings, considered with individual cases reported by other groups, indicate that transplantation from a cadaver donor with immunogenic mismatched class I HLA antigen(s) shared with the husband should be avoided in women with a previous history of pregnancy even when anti-HLA antibodies are not currently detected.     

Should epitope-based HLA compatibility be used in the kidney allocation system?

The new kidney allocation system (KAS) still applies donor-recipient HLA compatibility mostly at the antigen level and although some four-digit alleles have been included. This system is used to record unacceptable mismatches for sensitized transplant candidates with serum HLA antibodies. Since the reactivities of such antibodies are specifically associated with epitopes rather than HLA antigens, a more scientifically accurate assessment of mismatch acceptability could be based on epitopes. HLA class I and class II epitope specificity analyses can now be readily performed with serum antibody assays with single allele panels. This report describes an epitope-based HLA compatibility system for KAS and involves recipient and donor HLA typing at the four-digit allele level. It focuses on sensitized patients who have serum antibodies specific for HLA epitopes that can be entered as unacceptable mismatches in the transplant candidate database. Newly developed software programs could readily identify compatible HLA types.     

Evaluation of three different laboratory methods to detect preformed human leukocyte antigen antibodies in a South African kidney transplant population

BackgroundAnti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies (anti-HLA) play a crucial role in graft. Detection of anti-HLA, both pre- and post-transplant is a crucial investigation in clinical organ transplantation.ObjectivesThree methodologies for the detection of lymphocytotoxic antibodies were compared to establish which of these is best suited to optimise pre-transplant donor-recipient matching.MethodsSerum samples from 15 renal transplant patients were tested for the presence of anti-HLA by i) cytotoxic-dependent cross-match (CDCXM), ii) flow cytometric cross-match (FCXM) and iii) Luminex-based donor specific antibody cross-match (DSAXM) method, Confirmatory tests for the presence of preformed HLA antibodies were tested using Luminex methodology.ResultsTwo (13%) of the 15 patients had positive HLA Class I antibodies (Ab) using all 3 methods. An additional 2 HLA Class I Ab were identified with FCXM/CDCXM. DSAXM identified 1 HLA Class I positive, not indicated by CDCXM/FCXM.High HLA Class II positivity (40%), identified by CDCXM, while DSAXM and FCXM identified two and one patients, respectively. CDCXM produced 4 false-positive results confirmed by lymphocyte single antigen (LSA) assay.ConclusionsThe DSAXM method appears to add value in pre-transplantation screening to identify pre-sensitised patients that may not reject the donor graft due to the absence of donor-specific antibodies.     

Incidence and impact of allele-specific anti-HLA antibodies and high-resolution HLA genotyping on assessing immunologic compatibility

The ability to identify specific HLA molecules against which a patient has alloantibodies has revolutionized assessment of immunologic compatibility. Anti-HLA antibodies are typically evaluated as reactive against well-defined serologic antigen groups. Thus, donor HLA genotyping is aimed at defining HLA at the serologic split-antigen level to avoid incompatible antigen-antibody combinations. However, anti-HLA antibodies can have reactivities not accurately described by well-defined serologic antigens. While existence of these antibodies is acknowledged, their precise impact on clinical practice is not clear. We performed a single-center review of 2 years of pre-and post-transplant anti-HLA antibody testing data combined with high-resolution HLA genotyping data for living and deceased organ donors to evaluate the clinical impact of anti-HLA antibodies with reactivities outside of commonly defined serologic antigen groups. We find approximately 15% of patients awaiting transplantation have alloantibodies with differential reactivity for HLA proteins encoded by specific alleles within a serologic antigen group. Allele-specific antibodies are associated with positive cellular crossmatches not accurately predicted by standard donor HLA genotyping and can manifest as post-transplant donor-specific antibodies. Our data highlights the importance of evaluating anti-HLA antibodies at the allele-level and provides evidence supporting utility for high-resolution HLA genotyping in solid organ transplantation.     

Presence of Antibodies against Self Human Leukocyte Antigen Class II Molecules in Autoimmune Hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) can arise de novo after liver transplantation (LT) for non-autoimmune liver diseases. Considering the identical features of de novo AIH after LT and classical AIH, as well as the importance of anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies in graft rejection, we investigated the presence of circulating anti-HLA class II antibodies in the sera of 35 patients with AIH, 30 patients with primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC), and 30 healthy donors using fluorescent dye-impregnated beads bound to HLA molecules. We then investigated the allele specificity of the antibodies and identified the HLA alleles in each patient using DNA-based HLA typing. We also examined HLA class II expression in liver samples using immunohistochemistry. Anti-HLA class II antibodies were detected significantly more frequently in the patients with AIH (88.1%) than in the patients with PBC (33.3%) or in the healthy donors (13.3%) (both P <0.01). We confirmed that the anti-HLA class II antibodies in the AIH patients showed specificity for several HLA class II alleles, including self HLA class II alleles. Moreover, positive reactivity with anti-self HLA class II antibodies was associated with higher serum transaminase levels. In conclusion, we demonstrated, for the first time, that antibodies against self HLA class II alleles were detectable in patients with AIH. Our results suggest that an antibody-mediated immune response against HLA class II molecules on hepatocytes may be involved in the pathogenesis or acceleration of liver injury in AIH.     

Anti-HLA class II antibodies in kidney retransplant patients

The relevance of anti-HLA class II antibodies for kidney graft survival is still controversial. In part, this can be attributed to difficulties to detect and differentiate anti-HLA class II antibodies. Anti-HLA class II IgG antibody screening was performed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Subsequently, all anti-HLA class II-positive sera were subjected to the determination and specification using color-coded microspheres coated with purified HLA antigens. In a cohort of 934 patients awaiting kidney transplantation, 41 sera (4.4%) were positive for IgG anti-HLA class II antibodies. The presence was confirmed in 90.2% sera by retesting. Subsequently, all anti-HLA class II-positive patients (n = 27) who in the past had undergone a kidney transplantation with an HLA-DR and/or -DQ-mismatched graft were selected. In 25 of 27 sera (92.6%), the alloantibody specificities corresponded to the known previous transplant mismatches on a broad antigen level. In 20 of 27 sera (74.1%), anticlass I antibodies were detected as well. Anti-HLA-DP antibodies were seen in 24 of the 27 sera of this cohort. In the majority of the cases, the reactivities with different DPB1 alleles could be explained by involvement of a single, specific DPB1 epitope. Donor-specific anti-HLA-DR and -DQ antibodies were seen in the majority of cases with graft failure following HLA class II alloantigen exposure in prior kidney transplantations. In addition, HLA-DP may serve as a transplantation antigen in kidney transplantation, leading to a humoral response.