Treatment and outcomes of nonagenarians with ST-elevation myocardial infarction

There is no age limit for reperfusion therapy in the current guidelines for the treatment of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Reperfusion therapy, although associated with better outcomes, is not always offered to the oldest patients. A retrospective analysis at our institution of all patients ≥ 90 years of age with a diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome at discharge from 2004 to 2008 identified 24 patients with STEMI. The majority of patients were Caucasian, females, hypertensive, with a low incidence of dementia and diabetes. Only 29% of patients presented to the hospital in less than 6 hours. Thirteen patients were treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and 11 patients were treated medically. The in-hospital mortality was 23% in the PCI group and 36% in the medical therapy group. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated a survival benefit favoring PCI, which disappeared when only patients presenting after 6 hours to the hospital were analyzed. PCI-treated patients had no procedure-associated complications and had a good prognosis if they survived to hospital discharge. PCI should be offered to nonagenarians presenting with STEMI.     

Racial disparity in clinical outcomes following primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST elevation myocardial infarction: influence of process of care

Previous studies have shown that compared with white patients, non-white patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) have worse clinical outcomes. Differences in co-morbidities, extent and severity of coronary artery disease, health insurance, and socioeconomic status have been identified as possible reasons for this disparity. However, an alternative explanation for such observed disparities in outcomes could be differences in process of care. For example, in most of these studies, non-white patients were less likely to receive reperfusion therapy, and if treated, were more likely to receive thrombolysis than to undergo primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We hypothesized that if all patients were treated similarly with primary PCI, there would be no difference in clinical outcomes. We analyzed the demographic, angiographic, in-hospital clinical outcomes, and long-term mortality rates of a racially diverse group of patients presenting to the same hospital with STEMI, all of whom were treated with primary PCI. Our data demonstrate that compared with white patients, non-white patients with STEMI who undergo primary PCI have similar in-hospital clinical outcomes and one-year mortality. This suggests that the previously observed differences in mortality rates may be, at least in part, attributable to differences in the process of care, and not solely to differences in patient factors or differential therapeutic effects.     

Risk stratification for ST segment elevation myocardial infarction in the era of primary percutaneous coronary intervention

Acute coronary syndromes presenting with ST elevation are usually treated with emergency reperfusion/revascularisation therapy. In contrast current evidence and national guidelines recommend risk stratification for non ST segment elevation myocardial infarction(NSTEMI) with the decision on revascularisation dependent on perceived clinical risk. Risk stratification for STEMI has no recommendation. Statistical risk scoring techniques in NSTEMI have been demonstrated to improve outcomes however their uptake has been poor perhaps due to questions over their discrimination and concern for application to individuals who may not have been adequately represented in clinical trials. STEMI is perceived to carry sufficient risk to warrant emergency coronary intervention [by primary percutaneous coronary intervention(PPCI)] even if this results in a delay to reperfusion with immediate thrombolysis. Immediate thrombolysis may be as effective in patients presenting early, or at low risk, but physicians are poor at assessing clinical and procedural risks and currently are not required to consider this. Inadequate data on risk stratification in STEMI inhibits the option of immediate fibrinolysis, which may be cost-effective. Currently the mode of reperfusion for STEMI defaults to emergency angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention ignoring alternative strategies. This review article examines the current risk scores and evidence base for risk stratification for STEMI patients. The requirements for an ideal STEMI risk score are discussed.     

Fate of patients with prehospital resuscitation for ST-elevation myocardial infarction and a high rate of early reperfusion therapy (results from the PREMIR [Prehospital Myocardial Infarction Registry])

Patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) needing prehospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) have a very high adverse-event rate. However, little is known about the fate of these patients and predictors of mortality in the era of early reperfusion therapy. From March 2003 through December 2004, 2,317 patients with prehospital diagnosed STEMI were enrolled in the Prehospital Myocardial Infarction Registry. One hundred ninety patients (8.2%) underwent prehospital CPR and were included in our analysis. Overall 90% of patients were treated with early reperfusion therapy, 56.3% received prehospital thrombolysis and 1/2 of these patients received early percutaneous coronary intervention after thrombolysis, 28.4% of patients were treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention, and 5.3% received in-hospital thrombolysis. Total mortality was 40.0%. The highest mortality was seen in patients with asystole (63%) or pulseless electric activity (64%). Independent predictors of mortality were need for endotracheal intubation and older age, whereas ventricular fibrillation as initial heart rhythm was associated with survival. In conclusion, in this large registry with prehospital diagnosed STEMI, incidence of prehospital CPR was about 8%. Even with a very high rate of early reperfusion therapy, in-hospital mortality was high. Especially in elderly patients with asystole as initial heart rhythm and with need for endotracheal intubation, prognosis is poor despite aggressive reperfusion therapy.     

Quantitative analysis of the impact of total ischemic time on myocardial perfusion and clinical outcome in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction

Early reperfusion of the infarct-related coronary artery is an important issue in improvement of outcomes after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). In this study, the clinical significance of total ischemic time on myocardial reperfusion and clinical outcomes was evaluated in patients with STEMI treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention and thrombus aspiration and additional triple-antiplatelet therapy. Total ischemic time was defined as time from symptom onset to first intracoronary therapy (first balloon inflation or thrombus aspiration). All patients with STEMI treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention with total ischemic times ≥30 minutes and <24 hours from 2005 to 2008 were selected. Ischemic times were available in 1,383 patients, of whom 18.4% presented with total ischemic times ≤2 hours, 31.2% >2 to 3 hours, 26.8% >3 to 5 hours, and 23.5% >5 hours. Increased ischemic time was associated with age, female gender, hypertension, and diabetes. Patients with total ischemic times <5 hours more often had myocardial blush grade 3 (40% to 45% vs 22%, p <0.001) and complete ST-segment resolution (55% to 60% vs 42%, p = 0.002) than their counterparts with total ischemic times >5 hours. In addition, patients with total ischemic times ≤5 hours had lower 30-day mortality (1.5% vs 4.0%, p = 0.032) than patients with total ischemic times >5 hours. In conclusion, in this contemporary cohort of patients with STEMI treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention, triple-antiplatelet therapy, and thrombus aspiration, short ischemic time was associated with better myocardial reperfusion and decreased mortality. After a 5-hour period in which outcomes remain relatively stable, myocardial reperfusion becomes suboptimal and mortality increases.     

Reperfusion strategies in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a comprehensive review of contemporary management options

There are an estimated 500,000 ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) events in the U.S. annually. Despite improvements in care, up to one-third of patients presenting with STEMI within 12 h of symptom onset still receive no reperfusion therapy acutely. Clinical studies indicate that speed of reperfusion after infarct onset may be more important than whether pharmacologic or mechanical intervention is used. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), when performed rapidly at high-volume centers, generally has superior efficacy to fibrinolysis, although fibrinolysis may be more suitable for many patients as an initial reperfusion strategy. Because up to 70% of STEMI patients present to hospitals without on-site PCI facilities, and prolonged door-to-balloon times due to inevitable transport delays commonly limit the benefit of PCI, the continued role and importance of the prompt, early use of fibrinolytic therapy may be underappreciated. Logistical complexities such as triage or transportation delays must be considered when a reperfusion strategy is selected, because prompt fibrinolysis may achieve greater benefit, especially if the fibrinolytic-to-PCI time delay associated with transfer exceeds approximately 1 h. Selection of a fibrinolytic requires consideration of several factors, including ease of dosing and combination with adjunctive therapies. Careful attention to these variables is critical to ensuring safe and rapid reperfusion, particularly in the prehospital setting. The emerging modality of pharmacoinvasive therapy, although controversial, seeks to combine the benefits of mechanical and pharmacologic reperfusion. Results from ongoing clinical trials will provide guidance regarding the utility of this strategy.     

Reperfusion strategies in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a comprehensive review of contemporary management options.

There are an estimated 500,000 ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) events in the U.S. annually. Despite improvements in care, up to one-third of patients presenting with STEMI within 12 h of symptom onset still receive no reperfusion therapy acutely. Clinical studies indicate that speed of reperfusion after infarct onset may be more important than whether pharmacologic or mechanical intervention is used. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), when performed rapidly at high-volume centers, generally has superior efficacy to fibrinolysis, although fibrinolysis may be more suitable for many patients as an initial reperfusion strategy. Because up to 70% of STEMI patients present to hospitals without on-site PCI facilities, and prolonged door-to-balloon times due to inevitable transport delays commonly limit the benefit of PCI, the continued role and importance of the prompt, early use of fibrinolytic therapy may be underappreciated. Logistical complexities such as triage or transportation delays must be considered when a reperfusion strategy is selected, because prompt fibrinolysis may achieve greater benefit, especially if the fibrinolytic-to-PCI time delay associated with transfer exceeds approximately 1 h. Selection of a fibrinolytic requires consideration of several factors, including ease of dosing and combination with adjunctive therapies. Careful attention to these variables is critical to ensuring safe and rapid reperfusion, particularly in the prehospital setting. The emerging modality of pharmacoinvasive therapy, although controversial, seeks to combine the benefits of mechanical and pharmacologic reperfusion. Results from ongoing clinical trials will provide guidance regarding the utility of this strategy.     

Missed Opportunities in the Management of ST‐Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in the Arab Middle East: Patient and Physician Impediments

Background

Lack of timely reperfusion therapy in patients with ST‐elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has been associated with worse outcomes. The aim of this study is to identify the frequency and predictors of delayed presentation and missed reperfusion in patients with STEMI in the Gulf Register of Acute Coronary Events (Gulf RACE) registry. Delayed Presentation and missed reperfusion is associated with increased in hospital mortality in STEMI patients.

Methods

Gulf RACE is a prospective, multinational study of all consecutive patients hospitalized with the final diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome in 65 centers in 6 Arab countries. In this analysis, we included 3197 patients with STEMI. The independent predictors of delayed presentation and missed reperfusion therapy were identified using multivariate logistic regression.

Results

In total, 929 patients presented > 12 hours after symptom onset. The independent predictors of late presentation are older age, atypical symptoms, no family history of coronary artery disease, and being in Yemen. Of the 2268 STEMI patients presenting early, a total of 205 patients (9.3%) did not receive reperfusion therapy despite no contraindications (shortfall). The independent predictors of not receiving appropriate reperfusion therapy are older age, prior stroke, being in Yemen, and atypical symptoms. Lack of reperfusion therapy due to shortfall or delayed presentation was associated with increased in‐hospital mortality.

Conclusions

Nearly one‐third of patients with STEMI in the Arab Middle East present to the hospital > 12 hours after symptom onset, and nearly 1 in 10 eligible patients do not receive any reperfusion therapy. Community and physician awareness programs are needed to increase the utilization of appropriate lifesaving therapies. Copyright © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. The authors have no funding, financial relationships, or conflicts of interest to disclose.     

Regionalization of ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes care: putting a national policy in proper perspective

A uniform policy for regionalization of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) care raises several concerns. Transferring all STEMI patients to obtain primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) may be less effective than transferring only high-risk STEMI patients. Delays in time to treatment >60 min associated with transferring patients for primary PCI may result in increased mortality for the average patient as compared with providing immediate fibrinolytic therapy at their initial hospital; yet more than 95% of patients transferred for primary PCI in the U.S. exceed this 60-min benchmark. Superior outcomes associated with treatment at higher-volume regional STEMI centers are inconsistent among centers, and there is no direct evidence that patients will benefit by a transfer to a high-volume hospital from a low-volume hospital. Published data suggest as many as 800 PCI patients would need to be transferred to a high-volume PCI hospital to avoid a single death at a low-volume PCI hospital. Although European randomized trial data suggest transferring patients with STEMI for primary PCI may be superior to immediate fibrinolytic therapy, these findings are unlikely to generalize to the U.S. health care system given size, geography, and organization. ST segment elevation myocardial infarction care regionalization would require a massive redistribution of health care resources, depriving several hospitals of advanced cardiac care facilities, expertise, and associated revenue. Clearer evidence of the benefits and discussion of potential harms are needed before adopting a national STEMI regionalization policy.     

Regionalization of ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes care: putting a national policy in proper perspective.

A uniform policy for regionalization of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) care raises several concerns. Transferring all STEMI patients to obtain primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) may be less effective than transferring only high-risk STEMI patients. Delays in time to treatment >60 min associated with transferring patients for primary PCI may result in increased mortality for the average patient as compared with providing immediate fibrinolytic therapy at their initial hospital; yet more than 95% of patients transferred for primary PCI in the U.S. exceed this 60-min benchmark. Superior outcomes associated with treatment at higher-volume regional STEMI centers are inconsistent among centers, and there is no direct evidence that patients will benefit by a transfer to a high-volume hospital from a low-volume hospital. Published data suggest as many as 800 PCI patients would need to be transferred to a high-volume PCI hospital to avoid a single death at a low-volume PCI hospital. Although European randomized trial data suggest transferring patients with STEMI for primary PCI may be superior to immediate fibrinolytic therapy, these findings are unlikely to generalize to the U.S. health care system given size, geography, and organization. ST segment elevation myocardial infarction care regionalization would require a massive redistribution of health care resources, depriving several hospitals of advanced cardiac care facilities, expertise, and associated revenue. Clearer evidence of the benefits and discussion of potential harms are needed before adopting a national STEMI regionalization policy.     

Management Strategies and Outcomes of ST‐Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients Transferred After Receiving Fibrinolytic Therapy in the United States

Fibrinolytic therapy is still used in patients with ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) when the primary percutaneous coronary intervention cannot be provided in a timely fashion. Management strategies and outcomes in transferred fibrinolytic‐treated STEMI patients have not been well assessed in real‐world settings. Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 2008 to 2012, we identified 18 814 patients with STEMI who received fibrinolytic therapy and were transferred to a different facility within 24 hours. The primary outcome was in‐hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included gastrointestinal bleeding, bleeding requiring transfusion, intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), length of stay, and cost. The patients were divided into 3 groups: those who received medical therapy alone (n = 853; 4.5%), those who underwent coronary artery angiography without revascularization (n = 2573; 13.7%), and those who underwent coronary artery angiography with revascularization (n = 15 388; 81.8%). Rates of in‐hospital mortality among the groups were 20% vs 6.6% vs 2.1%, respectively (P < 0.001); ICH was 8.5% vs 1.1% vs 0.6%, respectively (P < 0.001); and gastrointestinal bleeding was 1.1% vs 0.4% vs 0.4%, respectively (P = 0.011). Multivariate analysis identified increasing age, higher Charlson Comorbidity Index score, cardiogenic shock, cardiac arrest, and ICH as the independent predictors of not performing coronary artery angiography and/or revascularization in patients with STEMI initially treated with fibrinolytic therapy. The majority of STEMI patients transferred after receiving fibrinolytic therapy undergo coronary angiography. However, notable numbers of patients do not receive revascularization, especially patients with cardiogenic shock and following a cardiac arrest.     

影响ST段抬高心肌梗死患者再灌注决定延迟的因素

目的 调相急性ST段抬高心肌梗死(STEMI)患者的再灌注决定延迟程度并分析其影响因素.方法 本研究为多中心现况调查.入选2006年1月1日至12月31日期间就诊于北京市19所医院并接受心肌再灌注治疗的635例急性STEMI患者.入院1周内,通过与患者进行结构式访谈及查阅病例记录收集资料.再灌注决定延迟定义为院内完成首份心电图至患者或家属签署治疗同意书的时间间隔.根据再灌注决定延迟时间分为早决定组(≤30 min)和晚决定组(＞30 min),采用单凶素和多因素分析识别影响再灌注决定延迟的相关凶素.结果 接受溶栓者129例(20.3%),接受直接PCI者506例(79.7%).中位再灌注决定延迟时间为47 min,中位进门-溶栓时间为82 min,中位进门-球囊扩张时间为135 min.多元logistic回归分析显示,了解再灌注治疗(OR=1.723,95%CI:1.156～3.212,P=0.040)、有院前心电图(OR=1.566,95% CI:1.018～2.409,P=0.036)、入院时心功能Killip分级≥2(OR=1.579,95% CI:1.004～2.483,P=0.021)以及就诊于心血管专科医院(OR=5.075,95%CI:1.380～18.655,P=0.014)是再灌注决定延迟≤30 min的独立预测因素.早决定组的中位进门-溶栓时间(47 min比103 min,P＜0.001)和中位进门-球囊扩张时间(100 min比154min,P＜0.001)明显短于晚决定组.结论 STEMI的再灌注决定延迟时间偏长,是院内延迟的主要部分.普及再灌注治疗知识以及通过救护车转运增加院前心电图完成率可能缩短院内延迟.     

Appropriate invasive and conservative treatment strategies for patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The goal of treatment strategies for patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction is to reperfuse the occluded coronary artery, as rapidly and safely as possible. This review discusses evidence regarding the appropriate treatment strategy for patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction taking into consideration geographical and logistical barriers. RECENT FINDINGS: Primary percutaneous coronary intervention is considered the gold standard of myocardial reperfusion. As therapy is time dependent, logistical barriers limit its use to no more than 29% of ST elevation myocardial infarction patients worldwide. Most patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction who undergo primary angioplasty achieve mechanical reopening of the infarct-related artery beyond the established time limit from which left ventricular preservation and clinical benefit are less probable. In contrast, early administration of newer fibrin-specific thrombolytics is at least as effective as primary angioplasty, and can abort infarction and dramatically reduce mortality when given during the first 1-2 hours of onset. Consequently, key elements from the current guidelines recommend that patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction should be reperfused either by primary percutaneous coronary intervention performed 90 minutes after the first medical contact or by thrombolysis within 30 minutes of presentation to hospital. These advantages and disadvantages should generate distinct viewpoints on reperfusion strategies for patients with infarction. For patients admitted in a hospital with primary percutaneous coronary intervention facilities, this should be considered the reperfusion strategy. Options for patients admitted to community hospitals without percutaneous coronary intervention facilities include administration of fibrinolysis or transfer to a tertiary care center for primary percutaneous coronary intervention. SUMMARY: Implementation of reperfusion strategies should vary based on the mode of transportation of the patient and capabilities at the receiving hospital.     

Reperfusion options in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients with expected delays

Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) is the optimal reperfusion strategy for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients when performed in a timely manner by experienced providers. Unfortunately, only 25% of US hospitals have percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) capability. Transfer for PPCI has also been shown to improve outcomes if transfer times are short and PCI can be performed within 90 minutes. However, many STEMI patients cannot be transferred in a timely fashion because of long distances, adverse weather, or process-of-care delays. Recent data support strategies that combine fibrinolysis with transfer for PCI under these circumstances. The critical issue that is still debated is the timing of PCI (immediate vs delayed vs rescue). The significance of time to reperfusion to mortality is important but less critical for PCI than for fibrinolysis, but time still matters. To optimize time to reperfusion for STEMI patients, all hospitals need to have predetermined protocols in place based on hospital characteristics and proximity to a catheterization laboratory.     

Combined Thrombolysis with Abciximab Favourably Influences Platelet-Leukocyte Interactions and Platelet Activation in Acute Myocardial Infarction

Background: The standard of care for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is prompt coronary reperfusion with thrombolysis or percutaneous coronary intervention. Women have higher mortality rates than men following STEMI and fewer women are considered eligible for reperfusion therapy. We analyzed the impact of gender, and other factors, on the outcome and treatment of STEMI in the TETAMI trial and registry.Methods: This exploratory analysis included 2741 patients from Treatment with Enoxaparin and Tirofiban in Acute Myocardial Infarction (TETAMI) presenting with STEMI within 24 hours of symptom onset. The primary composite end point was the combined incidence of all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction, and recurrent angina, at 30 days. Three multivariate analyses were performed to determine predictors of not receiving reperfusion therapy, the composite end point, or death.Results:The triple end point occurred in 17.8% of women versus 13.3% of men. Reperfusion therapy was utilized in 38.2% of women versus 47.3% in men. However, age > 75 years, delayed presentation, high systolic blood pressure (> 100) and region (South Africa), were significant, independent predictors of not receiving reperfusion therapy. Significant predictors of the triple end point included not receiving reperfusion therapy, age > 60 years, and higher Killip class. Predictors of death included age > 60 years, low systolic blood pressure, higher Killip class, high heart rate, delayed presentation, and region (South Africa and South America).Conclusion: Female gender was not an independent predictor of outcome or underutilization of reperfusion therapy. Factors more common in female STEMI patients (advanced age and delayed presentation) were associated with not receiving reperfusion therapy and adverse outcome. Increased awareness is needed to reduce delayed presentation after symptom onset, especially among women.Abbreviated abstract. In this analysis of 2741 ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients in the TETAMI trial and registry, a trend was observed for women being less likely to receive reperfusion therapy and more likely to have an adverse outcome than men. This was related to factors more common in female patients (advanced age and delayed presentation), and showed that an increased awareness is needed to reduce delayed presentation after symptom onset, especially among women.Supported by a grant from sanofi-aventis, Bridgewater, NJ, USA.     

Current perspectives on reperfusion therapy for acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: integrating pharmacologic and mechanical reperfusion strategies

The therapeutic approach to patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has advanced rapidly over the past decade. Intravenous fibrinolytic therapy remains the most common form of reperfusion therapy worldwide, since fibrinolytics are associated with a dramatic reduction in mortality rates. However, primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with improved outcomes and less bleeding complications compared with fibrinolytic therapy, but it is not widely available. Adjunctive therapies with intracoronary stents, glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors, and more potent antithrombin agents have shown great promise for the initial treatment of STEMI and have stimulated further investigation of combined pharmacological/mechanical reperfusion strategies that may be synergistic. Although the optimal combination of fibrinolytics, antiplatelet agents, antithrombins, and mechanical reperfusion at hospitals with and without primary PCI facilities remains elusive, results from recent studies suggest that such a combined approach may facilitate transfer of patients with STEMI from a referral hospital to an invasive hospital for definitive primary PCI after administration of a potent pharmacologic regimen designed to enhance early infarct-related artery reperfusion. Thus, as the reperfusion era continues to evolve, the ideal treatment strategy for patients with STEMI is being redefined to integrate pharmacologic and mechanical approaches to reperfusion.     

Effect of clopidogrel on 1-year mortality in hospital survivors of acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in clinical practice.

AIMS: We sought to assess the effect of clopidogrel on clinical events 1 year after discharge in survivors of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in clinical practice. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analysed data of consecutive survivors of acute STEMI and either concomitant therapy with aspirin or aspirin plus clopidogrel at discharge, who were prospectively enrolled in the Acute Coronary Syndromes (ACOS) registry between July 2000 and November 2002. A total of 5886 (3795 with and 2091 without clopidogrel) patients were included into this analysis. Patients were divided into three groups according to the initial reperfusion therapy: no reperfusion therapy (n=1445), fibrinolysis (n=1734), or primary PCI (n=2707). The multivariable analysis for 12+2 month mortality after discharge using the propenstiy score with adjustment for baseline characteristics and treatments (age, sex, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, prior MI, hyperlipidaemia, renal insufficiency, cardiogenic shock, heart rate, systolic blood pressure, anterior infarct location, reduced left ventricular function, elective revascularization, beta-blockers, statins, ACE-inhibitors) showed that mortality was significantly lower in the aspirin plus clopidogrel group compared with the aspirin group in the total group and patients with reperfusion therapy [total group odds ratio (OR) 0.48, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.48-0.61; no reperfusion therapy OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.65-1.45; fibrinolysis OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.32-0.87; primary percutaneous coronary intervention OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.23-0.62]. CONCLUSION: In clinical practice, adjunctive therapy with clopidogrel, in addition to aspirin, in survivors after STEMI is associated with a reduction in 1-year mortality in patients treated with early reperfusion therapy.     

Gender differences in acute myocardial infarction in the era of reperfusion (the MITRA registry)

There is conflicting information about gender differences in presentation, treatment, and outcome after acute ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in the era of thrombolytic therapy and primary percutaneous coronary intervention. From June 1994 to January 1997, we enrolled 6,067 consecutive patients with STEMI admitted to 54 hospitals in southwest Germany in the Maximal Individual TheRapy of Acute myocardial infarction (MITRA), a community-based registry. Women were 9 years older than men, more often had hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and congestive heart failure, and had a history of previous myocardial infarction less often. Women had a longer prehospital delay (45 minutes), had anterior wall infarction more often (odds ratio [OR] 1.21; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08 to 1.36), and received reperfusion therapy less often (OR 0.83; 95% CI 0.74 to 0.94). The percentage of patients who were eligible for thrombolysis and received no reperfusion was higher in women (OR 1.7; 95% CI 1.56 to 1.89). Women had recurrent angina (OR 1.45; 95% CI 1.23 to 1.71) and congestive heart failure (OR 1.26; 95% CI 1.01 to 1.56) more often. There was a trend toward a higher hospital mortality in women (age-adjusted OR 1.16, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.35; multivariate OR 1.21, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.51), but there was no gender difference in long-term mortality after multivariate analysis (age-adjusted OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.15; multivariate OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.19). Thus, women with STEMI receive reperfusion therapy less often than men. They experience recurrent angina and congestive heart failure more often during their hospital stay. The age-adjusted long-term mortality is not different between men and women, but there is a trend for a higher short-term mortality in women.     

Hospitalphase der Patienten mit STEMI im Essener Herzinfarktverbund

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The myocardial infarction network "Herzinfarktverbund Essen", existing since 2004, was designed to introduce guideline therapy of ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) into everyday clinical practice using primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) as the preferred reperfusion strategy, early prescribing recommended medication and optimizing patient's pathway from the first symptom to rehabilitation in a city of 580,000 inhabitants. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In the 1st year, 489 patients were treated in five high-volume PCI centers. 444 primary PCIs were performed (90.8%). RESULTS: In-hospital mortality was 7.6% and thus lower than in other, historical STEMI registers with similar baseline characteristics but lower PCI rate. The best risk predictor was left ventricular function. Patients with an ejection fraction (EF) 相似文献   

Clinical characteristics, hospital morbidity and mortality, and up to 1-year follow-up events of acute myocardial infarction patients: the first report from Iran

BACKGROUND: Few data exist about the clinical epidemiology of acute myocardial infarction and its complications and mortality in Iran. To fill this knowledge gap, we studied clinical characteristics and the outcome for a group of Iranian patients with acute myocardial infarction, who were, for the first time in our country, followed after discharge from hospital for 1 year. METHODS: All patients (139 individuals) with confirmed acute myocardial infarction who were treated at the coronary care unit of Dr Shariati Hospital and followed up over a 1-year period (June 2002 to June 2003) were prospectively studied. Numerous relevant variables including epidemiologic data, treatments received, in-hospital course and complications were recorded. The survivors were followed at 1, 6 and 12 months after discharge. RESULTS: In all, there were 101 men and 38 women aged 58.6+/-11.8 years. Only 35.9% of patients received thrombolytic therapy, and primary percutaneous coronary intervention was performed in 6.4% of cases. In-hospital death occurred in 21 of 139 (15.1%), with an equal distribution between the two sexes. One-month, 6-month and 12-month cumulative mortality rates were 17.3, 20.1 and 21.6%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Although our patients were younger than myocardial infarction patients in developed countries, they had a higher rate of in-hospital mortality than those of the international statistics. This may be due, in part, to the lower rate of administration of primary reperfusion strategies in our center, namely primary percutaneous coronary intervention and thrombolytic therapy, which have proved to be effective in reducing the mortality from myocardial infarction in the west. Wider application of primary percutaneous coronary intervention, in particular, is recommended.