Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist therapy is associated with prolonged patient and graft survival after renal transplantation

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) or angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers (ARB) reduce cardiovascular death in the general population, but data for renal transplant recipients remain elusive. Similarly, ACEI/ARB have been shown to reduce proteinuria, but data on graft survival are lacking. Therefore a retrospective open cohort study was conducted of 2031 patients who received their first renal allograft at the Medical University of Vienna between 1990 and 2003 and survived at least 3 mo. Patient and graft survival was compared between patients with versus without ACEI and/or ARB therapy. Data were analyzed with and without propensity score models for ACEI/ARB therapy. Medication and comorbidities were analyzed as time-dependent variables in the Cox regression analyses. Ten-year survival rates were 74% in the ACEI/ARB group but only 53% in the noACEI/ARB group (P<0.001). The hazard ratio (HR) of ACEI/ARB use for mortality was 0.57 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.40 to 0.81) compared with nonuse. Ten-year actual graft survival rate was 59% in ACEI/ARB patients but only 41% in nonusers (P=0.002). The HR of actual graft failure for ACEI/ARB recipients was 0.55 (95% CI 0.43 to 0.70) compared with nonusers; the HR of functional graft survival was 0.56 (95% CI 0.40 to 0.78). Ten-year unadjusted functional graft survival rates were 76% among ACEI/ARB patients and 71% in noACEI/ARB recipients (P=0.57). In summary, the use of ACEI/ARB therapy was associated with longer patient and graft survival after renal transplantation. More frequent use of these medications may reduce the high incidence of death and renal allograft failure in these patients.     

No improvement of patient or graft survival in transplant recipients treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers: a collaborative transplant study report

It was reported recently that treatment of kidney transplant recipients with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) or angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers (ARB) is associated with strikingly improved long-term graft and patient survival. This finding has important implications for future posttransplantation therapy recommendations. In an analysis of 17,209 kidney and 1744 heart transplant recipients, an association of treatment with ACEI/ARB with improved transplant outcome could not be confirmed. It is concluded that recommendations for a widespread use of ACEI/ARB treatment in transplant recipients are unwarranted.     

缬沙坦与贝那普利联用治疗移植肾慢性损伤的远期效果

目的 探讨血管紧张素受体拮抗剂缬沙坦与血管紧张素转化酶抑制剂贝那普利联合应用治疗肾移植患者移植肾慢性损伤的远期效果. 方法非糖尿病患者肾移植术后尿蛋白＞0.5g/d或SCr＞177 mmol/L(＞2 mg/d)32例,随机分2组:①治疗组23例.男9例,女14例.平均40岁.病理诊断慢性移植物肾病(CAN)13例、环孢素中毒3例、肾小球疾病7例.②对照组9例.男4例,女5例.平均35岁.CAN 6例、环孢素中毒1例、肾小球疾病2例.治疗组给予缬沙坦(80mg/d)与贝那普利(20 mg,2次/d)联合治疗3年,对照组未进行此项处理.比较2组患者治疗前后SCr、24 h尿蛋白变化及移植肾生存时间.结果 随访3年后,治疗组SCr为(252.2±117.9)mmol/L,对照组为(375.3±203.0)mmol/L,2组比较差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05).治疗组CAN患者SCr为(282.4±147.3)mmol/L,对照组为(528.7±107.8)mmol/L,2组比较差异有统计学意义(P＜0.01).治疗组24 h尿蛋白为(1.0±0.6)g,对照组为(1.3±0.7)g,组问差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05).移植肾存活时间治疗组76个月,对照组为71个月,组间差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05).结论 缬沙坦与贝那普利联合应用可保护移植肾功能,对蛋白尿及移植肾远期存活的影响有待进一步观察.     

Blood pressure, antihypertensive treatment, and graft survival in kidney transplant patients

Whether the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker inhibitor (ACEI/ARB) is beneficial in renal transplant recipients remains controversial. In this retrospective study on 505 renal transplant recipients, we analyzed blood pressure and graft survival according to antihypertensive treatment with ACE-I/ARB and/or calcium channel blockers (CCB) over a period of 10 years. Patients were stratified according to their blood pressure 1 year after transplantation [controlled (≤130/80 mmHg; CTR, 181 patients) and noncontrolled (>130/80 mmHg; non-CTR, 324 patients)] and according to antihypertensive treatment (ACE-I/ARB and/or CCB taken for at least 2 years). One year after transplantation, 88.4% of CTR and 96.6% of non-CTR received antihypertensive treatment ( P  < 0.05). Graft survival was longer in CTR than in non-CTR ( P  < 0.05). Importantly, graft survival was longer in patients who received long-term treatment with ACEI/ARB, CCB, or a combination of ACEI/ARB and CCB ( P  < 0.001). The beneficial effect of ACEI/ARB therapy was more pronounced in non-CTR compared with that of CTR. We conclude that blood pressure control is a key target for long-term graft survival in renal transplant patients. Long-term ACEI/ARB and CCB therapy is beneficial for graft survival, especially in patients with diabetes and/or albuminuria.     

Risk factors and prognosis for proteinuria in renal transplant recipients

INTRODUCTION: Proteinuria in renal transplant recipients has been recognized as a risk factor of progression of chronic allograft nephropathy and for cardiovascular disease, the main causes of transplant failure. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed the risk factors for persistent proteinuria (>0.5 g/day) among 337 kidney allograft recipients with a minimum follow-up of 6 months, among a series of 375 transplants performed during a decade, as well as their association with allograft and patient survivals. Patients with proteinuria greater than 0.5 g/d were treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) and/or angiotensin-receptor blockers. RESULTS: After a mean follow-up of 53.35 +/- 52.63 months, 68 patients (20.17%) had persistent proteinuria greater than 0.5 g/d. Female patients (P = .012), body mass index (BMI) >25 (P = .008), pretransplant HLA sensitization (P = .039), and delayed graft function (DGF; P = .001) were associated with proteinuria. Induction treatment with antithymocyte globulin (P = .030) and treatment with tacrolimus instead of cyclosporine (P = .046) were associated with an increased risk of proteinuria. Multivariate analysis confirmed the independent value of DGF (RR = 2.23; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.22 to 4.07; P = .009) and BMI >25 (RR = 1.968; 95% CI 1.05 to 3.68; P = .035) to predict postransplant proteinuria. The mean values of serum creatinine (P = .000) and systolic blood pressure (P < .05) were persistently higher from the early stages after transplantation in the proteinuric group. Graft survival at 5 years was 69% among patients who developed proteinuria and 93% in those without proteinuria (P = .000), with no differences in patient survival (P = .062). CONCLUSION: Proteinuria in renal transplant recipients was related to immunological and nonimmunological factors, some of which, such as hypertension and obesity could be modifiable. Proteinuria in renal transplant recipients predicted a worse allograft survival despite of intensive treatment of hypertension including ACEI/angiotensin-receptor blockers.     

ACE-inhibitor or AT2-antagonist therapy of renal transplant recipients is associated with an increase in serum potassium concentrations.

BACKGROUND: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) or angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers (ARB) are frequently prescribed to renal transplant recipients with a reduced glomerular filtration rate (GFR). The aim of this study was to investigate the association of ACEI/ARB use and serum potassium levels in renal graft recipients. METHODS: We conducted an open cohort study of 2041 first renal allograft recipients, transplanted at the Medical University of Vienna between 1990 and 2003. Serum potassium levels were compared over an up to 10 years of observation period between subjects with versus without ACEI/ARB therapy using a mixed effects general linear model. The analysis was adjusted for several covariables known to influence serum potassium such as the use of diuretics, beta blockers, calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) based immunosuppression, estimated GFR, time since renal transplantation, diabetes, years on dialysis and recipient age. RESULTS: The overall adjusted estimated serum potassium difference between recipients with versus without ACEI/ARB therapy was 0.08 mmol/l (P < 0.001). The use of diuretics was associated with a 0.11 mmol/l (P < 0.001) lower potassium concentration whereas each GFR decrease by 10 ml/min led to an increase of 0.04 mmol/l (P < 0.001). CNI intake increased serum potassium by 0.06 mmol/l (P = 0.002). Furthermore, serum potassium increased by 0.17 mmol/l within the first decade after transplantation (P < 0.001) while holding the other covariables constant. No effect modification between ACEI/ARB and time since transplantation was observed. Nineteen subjects (2.4%) discontinued the ACEI/ARB therapy due to hyperkalaemia. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, relevant hyperkalaemia associated with ACEI/ARB therapy is negligible in renal transplant recipients during long-term follow-up. The hyperkalaemic effect of ACEI/ARB is balanced by the use of diuretics.     

Association of Serum Uric Acid With Graft Survival After Kidney Transplantation: A Time‐Varying Analysis

The association of serum uric acid (UA) with kidney transplant outcomes is uncertain. We examined the predictive value of UA during the first year posttransplant as a time‐varying factor for graft survival after adjustment for time‐dependent and independent confounding factors. Four hundred and eighty‐eight renal allograft recipients transplanted from January 2004 to June 2006 and followed for 41.1 ± 17.7 months were included. Data on UA, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), tacrolimus level, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and prednisone doses, use of allopurinol, angiotensin‐converting enzyme‐inhibitor/angiotensin‐receptor‐blocker (ACEi/ARB) and diuretics at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months were collected. Primary endpoint of the study was graft loss, defined as graft failure and death. Cox proportional hazard models and generalized estimating equations were used for analysis. UA level was associated with eGFR, gender, retransplantation, decease‐donor organ, delayed graft function, diuretics, ACEi/ARB and MMF dose. After adjustment for these confounders, UA was independently associated with increased risk of graft loss (HR: 1.15, p = 0.003; 95% CI: 1.05–1.27). Interestingly, UA interacted with eGFR (HR: 0.996, p < 0.05; 95% CI: 0.993–0.999 for interaction term). Here, we report a significant association between serum UA during first year posttransplant and graft loss, after adjustment for corresponding values of time‐varying variables including eGFR, immunosuppressive drug regimen and other confounding factors. Its negative impact seems to be worse with lower eGFR.     

Statin use is associated with prolonged survival of renal transplant recipients

The efficacy of statins for the prevention of cardiovascular events is well established in the general population but remains unknown in renal transplant recipients. In this study, the association of statin use with patient and graft survival was investigated in a cohort of 2041 first-time recipients of renal allografts between 1990 and 2003. Multivariable Cox regression demonstrated that statin use was independently associated with lower mortality rates. Twelve-year survival rates were 73% for statin users and 64% for nonusers (P = 0.055). The adjusted hazard ratio for all-cause mortality associated with statin use was 0.64 (95% confidence interval 0.48 to 0.86). Graft survival rates during the same time period were 76% for statin users and 70% for nonusers (P = 0.055). The adjusted hazard ratio for graft survival associated with statin use was 0.76 (95% confidence interval 0.55 to 1.04). Results from marginal structural models were virtually identical. In summary, statin use was associated with prolonged patient survival, but no difference in graft survival was detected. Although these results are encouraging, a definitive causal relationship can be determined only from randomized clinical trials.     

IgA nephropathy in kidney allograft recipients-therapeutic perspective

INTRODUCTION: A growing number of patients are losing their kidney allografts due to glomerulonephritis. Although posttransplant IgA nephropathy (IgAN) is regarded as benign, it may lead to late allograft loss in a substantial number of patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of posttransplant IgAN on long-term transplantation outcomes, risk factors for progression of graft dysfunction, and effectiveness of therapeutic interventions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We evaluated, potential risk factors for accelerated graft loss among 27 kidney allograft recipients with posttransplant IgAN, comparing graft survival in a control group matched for population and transplantation-related parameters. We evaluated the effectiveness of therapeutic interventions regarding immunosuppressive regimen, and hypertension control including angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) usage with Kaplan-Meier, Cox proportional hazard plots, and log-rank tests in statistical analyses. RESULTS: Compared with the control group, patients with IgAN experienced a 6.57 higher risk for dialysis dependence (P < .01, 95% CI 1.4 to 30.83). The risk for accelerated graft loss in the course of IgAN was associated with graft dysfunction (RR = 2.16 for additional 1 mg/dL of serum creatinine at glomerulonephritis presentation; P < .03, 95% CI 1.2 to 4.36) and intense proteinuria as evidenced by a RR = 4.67 for the presence of the nephrotic syndrome (P < .05, 95% CI 0.95 to 22.8). Immunosuppression enhancement resulted in a significantly decreased risk of dialysis dependence, namely, RR = 4.76 (95% CI 1.12 to 20, P < .04). With ACEI treatment there was a tendency for a 2.8-fold decreased risk of dialysis dependence, without reaching statistical significance (P = .14). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with posttransplant IgAN may benefit from intensifying maintenance immunosuppression, which slows progression to end-stage graft dysfunction.     

Influence of pretransplant midodrine use on outcomes after kidney transplantation

Evaluation of potential kidney transplant recipients is important to identify and treat conditions that may influence graft or patient survival after transplantation. We performed a single‐center, observational cohort study to determine whether pretransplant midodrine use influences outcomes after kidney transplantation. We analyzed graft and patient outcomes for adult patients who underwent a kidney‐only transplantation at Barnes‐Jewish Hospital from January 1999 to December 2015. We quantified adjusted associations of pretransplant midodrine use with post‐transplant complications by multivariable Cox regression. Among the 2621 kidney transplant recipients analyzed, 37 (1.4%) were taking midodrine immediately prior to transplantation. Midodrine users were more commonly older (56.5 vs 50.4 years) and obese (67.6% vs 33.6%). Midodrine users were also more likely to be on hemodialysis (86.5% vs 59.2%), to have a longer duration of dialysis dependence (646 months vs 577 months), and to have higher levels of sensitization (peak panel reactive antibody >20%, 32.4% vs 15.8%) compared to nonusers. Pretransplant midodrine users had significantly higher rates of delayed graft function (DGF) (32.4% vs 6.7%, P < 0.001). No difference in the incidence of DGF was observed based on the midodrine dosing regimen. After multivariable adjustment for recipient and donor characteristics, pretransplant midodrine use was independently associated with graft failure at 1 year (adjusted hazard ratio, 5.11; 95% confidence interval, 2.09‐12.49).     

Inhibition of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 by angiotensin II receptor blockers on cyclosporine-treated renal allograft recipients

INTRODUCTION: We previously showed that proteinuria from a renal graft was significantly decreased by administration of losartan potassium, an angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB). To further evaluate the mechanism, we performed another clinical study focusing on the change in plasma plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) levels among cyclosporine (CyA)-treated renal allograft recipients. METHODS: Among 12 hypertensive CyA-treated kidney transplant patients, four received 25 to 50 mg/day of losartan; four, 4 to 8 mg/day of candesartan cilexetil; and another four, 20 to 40 mg/day of nifedipine. Four CyA-treated kidney-transplanted patients without hypertension were selected as a control group. Informed consent was obtained from all participants. PAI-1 and serum creatinine (S-Cr) levels were monitored every 3 months for 1 year. RESULTS: Considering the pretreatment of PAI-1 as 100%, the mean percent of PAI-1 at 1 year after the onset of study for losartan, candesartan, nifedipine, and control groups were 78.6 +/- 6.7%, 81.4 +/- 8.0%, 96.7 +/- 7.6%, and 110.4 +/- 9.2%, respectively. The ARB groups demonstrated significant differences from the control group (P < .01), while the nifedipine group did not. S-Cr levels among ARB-administered groups were increased slightly but temporarily. As for S-Cr levels, no significant differences were seen among the four groups. CONCLUSIONS: Control of hypertension itself is important for all renal graft recipients; however, PAI-1 reduction by ARBs was thought to be a key for renal preservation. We expect that ARBs will contribute to prolonged renal allograft survival.     

Proteinuria after conversion to sirolimus in kidney transplant recipients: impact of pre‐existing proteinuria,graft function,and angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin‐receptor antagonists

Marx C, Busch M, Ott U, Gerth J, Wolf G. Proteinuria after conversion to sirolimus in kidney transplant recipients: impact of pre‐existing proteinuria, graft function, and angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin‐receptor antagonists.
Clin Transplant 2009 DOI:10.1111/j.1399‐0012.2009.01142.x.
© 2009 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract: Background: Proteinuria is a known side effect of therapy with sirolimus. The effect of angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin‐receptor blockers (ACEI/ARB ) on sirolimus‐associated proteinuria has not yet been assessed. Patients and methods: A retrospective cohort study of renal transplant patients treated with sirolimus (n = 55) was performed. Results: Of 55 patients, 24 (44%) had no proteinuria (<0.15 g/d) prior to conversion. Of 24 patients, 11 (46%) showed de novo proteinuria >0.15 g/d after 12 months, only 2 developed proteinuria > 1 g/d. The total number of proteinuria >1 g/d after 12 months including patients with pre‐existing proteinuria >1 g/d (n = 3) was seven of 55 patients (13%). Multivariate regression analysis revealed pre‐existing proteinuria > 0.15 g/d and reduced glomerular filtration rate as independent predictors for the development of proteinuria after conversion to sirolimus. Conclusion: Reduced glomerular filtration rate and pre‐existing proteinuria but not therapy with ACEI/ARB are independent predictors for proteinuria after conversion to sirolimus. Treatment with ACEI/ARB did not reduce pre‐existing proteinuria after conversion except in single cases with severe proteinuria.     

The benefits of renin-angiotensin blockade in renal transplant recipients with biopsy-proven allograft nephropathy.

BACKGROUND: Allograft nephropathy, regardless of aetiology, leads to progressive renal injury and eventual graft loss. In native kidney disease, treatment of hypertension, in particular with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB), has proven beneficial in retarding renal function decline. In the present study, we reviewed the clinical course of a renal transplant recipient cohort that was prescribed either an ACEi or ARB for biopsy-proven allograft nephropathy. METHODS: Patients were followed from the time of post-biopsy initiation of ACEi/ARB and were stratified based on biopsy findings. Outcomes of interest included safety, allograft survival, renal function and change in slope of renal function pre- and post-ACEi/ARB. RESULTS: The 5 year allograft survival after biopsy diagnosis of allograft nephropathy was 83%. Serum creatinine was 191+/-97 (86-377) micromol/l at the time of biopsy and 228+/-102 (102-575) micromol/l at last follow-up. The slopes of reciprocal creatinine vs time were used to calculate the decline in renal function and were compared pre- and post-ACEi/ARB. The mean slope+/-SD was -0.06+/-0.21 l/micromol x 10(-3) per month in the 12 months prior to therapy and -0.03+/-0.09 l/micromol x 10(-3) per month following therapy. The absolute difference in slopes was 0.03 (P =<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with ACEi/ARB may be beneficial in the management of allograft nephropathy.     

Graft survival following living-donor renal transplantation: a comparison of tacrolimus and cyclosporine microemulsion with mycophenolate mofetil and steroids

BACKGROUND: Registry databases offer the statistical power to analyze differences in graft survival rates that may not be detected in randomized clinical trials. This study analyses 2-year graft survival using tacrolimus (tac) or cyclosporine (CsA) with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and steroids. METHODS: Data reported to the United Network for Organ Sharing Renal Transplant Registry for living-donor kidney patients receiving a transplant during 1998 to 1999 were included. The primary end point was graft survival after adjustment for confounding variables. A Cox model multivariate analysis was used to adjust for potential confounding factors. RESULTS: Patients receiving CsA-MMF (n=4,686) and tac-MMF (n=2,393) were included. Unadjusted all-cause 2-year graft survival rate was significantly higher with CsA-MMF than tac-MMF (94.3% vs. 92.2%, P=0.0006). After adjustment for potential confounding factors, risk of graft failure at 2 years was significantly higher in patients receiving tac-MMF versus CsA-MMF for both all-cause graft failure (hazards ratio [HR] 1.28, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09-1.49, P=0.002) and death-censored graft failure (HR 1.25, 95% CI 1.05-1.49, P=0.013). Other independent risk factors for graft failure were recipient or donor age greater than 55 years, female sex, pretransplant blood transfusions, one or two haplotype mismatches compared with zero haplotype mismatch, and panel reactive antibody (PRA) greater than 30%. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate that 2-year renal allograft survival is significantly higher in living-donor recipients receiving CsA compared with tac as initial immunosuppression in combination with MMF.     

Renin-angiotensin system blockade in biopsy-proven allograft nephropathy

Allograft nephropathy leads to progressive renal injury and ultimate graft loss. In native kidney disease, the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) is beneficial in retarding the decline of renal function. We reviewed a cohort of renal transplant recipients who were prescribed either an ACEi or ARB for biopsy-proven allograft nephropathy. Patients were followed from time of initiation of ACEi/ARB and were stratified based on biopsy findings. Outcomes of interest included safety, allograft survival, renal function, and rate of renal function decline pre- and post-ACEi/ARB. The 5-year allograft survival after biopsy was 83%. Mean serum creatinine was 2.2 +/- 1.1 mg/dL (range 1.0 to 4.3) at time of biopsy and 2.6 +/- 1.2 mg/dL (1.2 to 6.5) at last follow-up. The mean slope of the creatinine versus time (SD) was 2.43 (7.93) in the 12 months prior to therapy and 1.45 (3.66) following therapy, with the absolute difference in slope -3.38 (6.06) (P =.0004). We conclude that treatment with ACEi/ARB is beneficial in the management of allograft nephropathy.     

Three‐month pancreas graft function significantly influences survival following simultaneous pancreas‐kidney transplantation in type 2 diabetes patients

Successful simultaneous pancreas‐kidney transplantation (SPK) improves quality‐of‐life and prolongs kidney allograft and patient survival in type‐1 diabetic (T1DM) patients. However, the use of SPK in type‐2 diabetic (T2DM) patients remains limited. We examined a national transplant registry for 35 849 T2DM kidney disease patients who received transplant between 2000 and 2016 and survived the first 3 months with a functioning kidney, and categorized as: deceased‐donor kidney transplant alone (DD‐KA, 68%), living‐donor kidney transplant alone (LD‐KA, 30%), or SPK (2%). Among SPK recipients, 6% had pancreas allograft failure within 3 months (SPK,P‐) and 94% had a functional pancreas (SPK,P+). Associations of transplant type with kidney allograft failure and death (multivariable‐adjusted hazard ratio, _95%LCLaHR_95%UCL), over follow‐up through December 2018, were quantified by multivariable inverse probability of treatment weighted survival analyses. SPK recipients had better kidney graft and patient survival than LD‐KA or DD‐KA recipients. Compared to SPK,P+, DD‐KA, or LD‐KA recipients had significantly higher risk of kidney allograft failure (DD‐KA: aHR _1.532.20_3.17; LD‐KA: aHR _1.291.87_2.71) and death (DD‐KA: aHR _2.123.25_5.00; LD‐KA: aHR _1.542.35_3.59). SPK,P‐ recipients had significantly higher risk of death (aHR _1.683.30_6.50). Similar to T1DM, T2DM patients with SPK have a survival benefit compared to those with kidney transplant alone, but this benefit depends upon successful early pancreas function.     

Posttransplantation glomerulonephritis: risk factors associated with kidney allograft loss

AIM OF THE STUDY: Chronic glomerulonephritis (GN) is reported as a common cause of late kidney allograft loss. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors associated with kidney allograft loss in the course of posttransplantation GN. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study analyzed 75 kidney allograft recipients with biopsy-confirmed posttransplantation GN, including 27 cases of immunoglobulin (Ig)A nephropathy (IgAN), 30 of membranous GN (MGN), 6 of mesangiocapillary GN (MCGN); and 12 of focal segmental GN (FSGS). The risk factors for kidney allograft loss, defined as dialysis reintroduction after GN onset, were identified through are historical cohort study. CLINICAL FINDINGS: After the onset of posttransplantation GN, the median time to dialysis introduction was 46 months. The risk factors for kidney allograft loss were as follows: male gender (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.92; 95% confidence intervall [CI] 1.0-3.70; P = .052), initial unsatisfactory kidney function (HR = 1.86 per 1 mg/dL serum creatinine increment; 95% CI 1.0-3.46; P < .05), graft dysfunction at diagnosis (HR = 1.65 per 1 mg/dL serum creatinine increment; 95% CI 1.32-2.07; P < .001), nephrotic syndrome (HR = 2.3; 95% CI 1.13-4.99; P < .05) late-onset GN (HR = 1.1 per each additional year of observation, 95% CI 1.0-1.21; P < .05), and MPGN as a type of GN. Enhanced immunosuppression increased and ACEI and/or statin treatment decreased the risk of return to dialysis, respectively: HR = 1.56, 95% CI 0.76-3.18, P = .22; HR = 0.39, 95% CI 0.16-0.98, P = .0037; and HR = 0.367, 95% CI 0.15-0.88, P = .025. CONCLUSIONS: Identification of risk factors can help discover patients who will have a faster progression to kidney allograft loss due to GN. In posttransplantation GN, statins and/or ACEI should be prescribed, if there are no contraindications.     

Deceased donor renal transplantation--does side matter?

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to determine whether the deceased donor kidney side (left or right kidney) was predictive of subsequent kidney transplant outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was undertaken of the left-right deceased donor kidney pairs transplanted into recipients with end-stage renal failure in Queensland between 1 April 1994 and 31 March 2004. RESULTS: A total of 201 left-right deceased donor kidney pairs were transplanted into 402 patients. The baseline characteristics of the recipients in the two groups were comparable, except that the patients receiving right kidneys had lower body mass indices and shorter cold ischaemic times. No differences were seen between the left and right kidney recipient groups with respect to operative duration (3.02 +/- 0.67 vs 3.12 +/- 0.72 h, P = 0.16), warm ischaemic time (0.62 +/- 0.18 vs 0.65 +/- 0.21, P = 0.09), delayed graft function (4 vs 6%, respectively, P = 0.26) or a composite vascular, haemorrhagic, ureteric and infective post-operative complication end-point (22 vs 22%, P = 0.90). Estimated glomerular filtration rates were almost identical at 1 month (52.7 +/- 39.6 vs 51.0 +/- 24.0 ml/min/1.73 m(2), P = 0.34) and remained comparable thereafter. Respective death-censored graft survival rates for left and right kidney recipients were 100 and 100% at 1 year, 99.4 and 96.4% at 3 years and 96.3 and 95.5% at 5 years, respectively (P = 0.67). CONCLUSIONS: Although left and right deceased donor kidneys present different operative challenges, the present results suggest that the probability of early post-operative complications, delayed graft function, impaired early and medium-term renal allograft function or death-censored graft failure is comparable between left and right kidney recipients.     

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition but not angiotensin II receptor blockade regulates matrix metalloproteinase activity in patients with glomerulonephritis

Equivalent long-term effects on the kidney are attributed to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) and angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers (ARB). Nevertheless, it is unknown to which degree effects of these compounds on individual inflammatory mediators, including matrix metalloproteinases (MMP), are comparable. On the basis of structural and functional differences, it was hypothesized that ACEI and ARB differentially regulate MMP activity. In a randomized, prospective crossover trial, the effect of an ACEI (fosinopril; 20 mg/d) and of an ARB (irbesartan; 150 mg/d) on MMP activity was evaluated. Ten hypertensive patients with glomerulonephritis and normal or mildly reduced creatinine clearance were studied. MMP activity and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinase (TIMP) levels were analyzed in serum and urine: without therapy, with ACEI, with ARB, and with both agents combined. Treatment periods continued for 6 wk separated by periods of 4 wk each without therapy. Untreated patients with glomerulonephritis displayed distinctively higher serum levels of MMP-2 but much lower MMP-1/-8/-9 concentrations compared with healthy control subjects. Immunohistology of MMP-2 and MMP-9 in kidney biopsy specimen was accordingly. However, these patients excreted higher amounts of MMP-2 and MMP-9 in urine than healthy control subjects, possibly reflecting ongoing glomerular inflammation. In patients with glomerulonephritis, ACEI significantly reduced overall MMP serum activity to 25%, whereas ARB did not show any effect. Activities of MMP-1/-2/-8/-9 were also significantly inhibited by fosinopril but not by irbesartan. Levels of TIMP-1/-2 remained unaffected. In conclusion, ACEI and ARB differentially regulate MMP activity, which may ultimately have consequences in certain types of MMP-dependent glomerulonephritis.