Osteoporosis in men treated with androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer

PURPOSE: We surveyed the growing literature on osteoporosis secondary to androgen deprivation therapy and provide suggestions regarding its identification and treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed pertinent studies of male osteoporosis, osteoporotic fracture incidence or bone mineral density loss as a possible side effect of prostate cancer treatment and potential therapies for this side effect. RESULTS: Hypogonadism is a well-known cause of secondary osteoporosis in men. There is evidence of decreased bone mineral density with all types of androgen deprivation therapy, presumably due to its anti-testosterone effect. Bone mineral density loss is 3% to 5% yearly in the first few years of androgen deprivation therapy with an increase in osteoporotic fracture incidence. There are little data on potential treatments, although bisphosphonates and intermittent androgen deprivation therapy may have salutary effects. CONCLUSIONS: Osteoporosis is an important and debilitating side effect of androgen deprivation therapy, although precise estimates of its incidence, degree and cost are not completely elucidated. Until more data are available, it is prudent for all men beginning androgen deprivation therapy to receive calcium and vitamin D, and maintain a moderate exercise regimen. Baseline and at least 1 followup bone density measurement seem appropriate with bisphosphonate treatment a possibility in those in whom osteoporosis develops. More research is needed to explore the effect of bisphosphonates, calcium and vitamin D supplementation, exercise, calcitonin, selective estrogen re-uptake inhibitors, estrogens and intermittent androgen deprivation therapy on the course of androgen deprivation therapy induced osteoporosis. The osteoporotic fracture incidence and bone mineral density should be regularly incorporated into studies involving the hormonal treatment of prostate cancer.     

Osteoporosis and spinal fractures in men with prostate cancer: risk factors and effects of androgen deprivation therapy

PURPOSE: We determined the risk factors for osteoporosis and spinal fractures in men with prostate cancer receiving androgen deprivation therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 87 consecutive men with prostate cancer receiving androgen deprivation therapy referred for evaluation of osteoporosis. Data were comprised of lateral thoracolumbar radiographs, bone densitometry, serum biochemistry and a detailed assessment of osteoporotic risk factors. Multivariate regression analysis was used to determine the major risk factors for osteoporosis and spinal fractures. RESULTS: There were 38 (44%) men who were 74.5 years old with radiographic evidence of spinal fractures. They had an initial mean prostate specific antigen of 52.8 ng/ml and had received androgen deprivation therapy for a mean of 39.6 months (95% confidence interval 28.7 to 50.4). Mean spinal (quantitative computerized tomography t-score -4.2) and femoral neck bone mineral densities (dual energy x-ray absorptiometry t-score -2.1) were significantly lower than in men without spinal fractures (p < 0.001 for all measurements). In the regression analysis the duration of androgen deprivation therapy (p = 0.002), serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels (p = 0.003) and a history of alcohol excess (defined as more than 4 standard drinks daily, p = 0.04) were the main determinants of spinal fractures. CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged androgen deprivation therapy, low serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels and a history of alcohol excess are important risk factors for osteoporosis and spinal fractures in men with prostate cancer.     

A prospective, randomized pilot study evaluating the effects of metformin and lifestyle intervention on patients with prostate cancer receiving androgen deprivation therapy

Study Type – Therapy (RCT) Level of Evidence 1b What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Men with prostate cancer have higher rates of non‐cancer mortality and CV morbidity and some of that excess risk has been attributed to the treatment they receive. ADT is an established treatment option for men with locally‐advanced and metastatic prostate cancer and, although it has been shown to confer a disease‐free survival advantage, it has also been associated with an increased incidence of CV disease and the metabolic syndrome (characterized by a cluster of CV risk factors, including insulin resistance). The benefits of the insulin sensitizer metformin and lifestyle intervention for reducing the incidence of metabolic syndrome have been shown in patients with impaired glucose tolerance. At the time of writing, the present study is the first to use metformin and lifestyle intervention in men with prostate cancer with the aim of reducing the risk of developing ADT‐related CV morbidity and the metabolic syndrome. The study shows that lifestyle changes and metformin may indeed reduce the complications of androgen suppression in these men. Although further investigations are needed to establish which of the two interventions may be most beneficial, the favourable effects of a combination of these interventions on patients' quality of life and the potential for improved overall survival are of clinical significance.

OBJECTIVE

• ? To investigate the effects of metformin and lifestyle changes on the development of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT)‐related metabolic syndrome.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

• ? Men with prostate cancer due to receive ADT were recruited and randomized.
• ? Controls received ADT alone.
• ? Men in the intervention arm received ADT with 6 months of metformin, a low glycaemic index diet and an exercise programme.
• ? All patients were investigated pretreatment and at 6 months for the metabolic syndrome, as well as for related biochemical and physical parameters.

RESULTS

• ? In total, 40 men were recruited and randomized (20 to each arm).
• ? After 6 months, significant improvements in abdominal girth (P= 0.05), weight (P < 0.001), body mass index (P < 0.001) and systolic blood pressure (P= 0.01) were seen in the intervention arm compared to controls.
• ? Biochemical markers of insulin resistance did not differ significantly.

CONCLUSIONS

• ? The present study shows the potential benefits of metformin and lifestyle changes in ADT‐treated men.
• ? Further studies will aim to determine which intervention is most important, and may show that overall survival can be improved.

     

Quality of life of asymptomatic men with nonmetastatic prostate cancer on androgen deprivation therapy

PURPOSE: We evaluate the quality of life of asymptomatic men with nonmetastatic prostate cancer who receive androgen deprivation therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Quality of life was longitudinally evaluated in a cohort of 144 men with locally advanced prostate cancer or prostate specific antigen relapse after local therapy who chose to receive (79 patients) or not to receive (65 patients) androgen deprivation therapy. Androgen deprivation therapy consisted of orchiectomy, leuprolide alone or leuprolide plus flutamide. Multivariate analysis of variance was used to test the effect of different treatment regimens on patient quality of life. RESULTS: Men who received androgen suppression had more fatigue, loss of energy, emotional distress and a lower overall quality of life than men who deferred hormone therapy. Combined androgen blockade had a greater adverse effect on quality of life than monotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Androgen deprivation therapy may significantly impair the physical and emotional health of asymptomatic patients with nonmetastatic prostate cancer.     

Androgens and prostate cancer risk: a prospective study

BACKGROUND: Androgens have been implicated in prostate tumorigenesis, but prospective studies have overall reported no association between circulating levels of androgens and risk of prostate cancer. However, some recent studies have shown that a high level of testosterone increase the risk of non-aggressive tumors but is associated with a decreased risk of aggressive tumors. METHODS: We prospectively measured plasma levels of total testosterone, androstanediol glucuronide (A-diol-g) and sex hormone binding globuline (SHBG) and calculated estimated levels of free testosterone, in a nested case-control study of 392 cases and 392 matched controls. RESULTS: None of the studied hormones were significantly associated with prostate cancer risk in the full study group or in subgroups according to tumor aggressiveness. Odds ratios in the full study group, for top versus bottom quartile, was for total testosterone 1.25 (95% CI = 0.79-2.00; P(trend) = 0.51); free testosterone, 1.31 (95% CI = 0.82-2.07; P(trend) = 0.35); A-diol-g, 0.88 (95% CI = 0.59-1.33; P(trend) = 0.77); and for SHBG, 1.01 (95% CI = 0.64-1.58; P(trend) = 0.94). CONCLUSIONS: We found no significant associations between androgen levels and risk of prostate cancer in this population-based, non-screened cohort.     

Changes in bone mineral density, lean body mass and fat content as measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry in patients with prostate cancer without apparent bone metastases given androgen deprivation therapy

PURPOSE: We characterize the consequences of androgen deprivation therapy on body composition in elderly men. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using a dual energy x-ray absorptiometry instrument, we determined the changes in bone mineral density, bone mineral content, fat body mass and lean body mass in 35 patients with prostate cancer without bone metastases who received luteinizing hormone releasing hormone analogue for 12 months. RESULTS: At baseline conditions 46% of cases were classified as osteopenic and 14% as osteoporotic at the lumbar spine and 40% were osteopenic and 4% osteoporotic at the hip. Androgen deprivation significantly decreased bone mineral density either at the lumbar spine (mean gm./cm.2 [SD] 1.00 [0.194], 0.986 [0.172] and 0.977 [0.182] at baseline, and 6 and 12 months, respectively, p <0.002) or the hip (0.929 [0.136], 0.926 [0.144] and 0.923 [0.138], p <0.03). A more than 2% decrease in bone mineral density was found at the lumbar spine in 19 men (54.3%) and at the hip in 15 (42.9%). Bone mineral content paralleled the bone mineral density pattern. Lean body mass decreased (mean gm. [SD] 50,287 [6,656], 49,296 [6,554] and 49,327 [6,345], p <0.003), whereas fat body mass consistently increased (18,115 [6,209], 20,724 [6,029] and 21,604 [5,923] p <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Serial bone densitometry evaluation during androgen deprivation therapy may allow the detection of patients with prostate cancer at risk for osteoporotic fractures, that is those with osteopenia or osteoporosis at baseline and fast bone loss. The change in body composition may predispose patients to accidental falls, thus increasing the risk of bone fracture.     

Bone mineral density changes in patients with prostate cancer during the first 2 years of androgen suppression

PURPOSE: We characterized bone mineral density changes in patients with prostate cancer on androgen deprivation therapy during the first 2 years of uninterrupted therapy, and identified which location most reflects bone mass loss. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, bone mineral density was prospectively assessed in patients with nonmetastatic prostate cancer at the lumbar spine and femoral neck, Ward's triangle, trochanter and total hip. Measurements were performed at baseline and yearly thereafter in patients on ADT, and at baseline and 1 year in controls (age matched patients with prostate cancer, free of biochemical progression after radical prostatectomy). RESULTS: A total of 62 patients were included in the study, 31 in each group. Median age (70 and 69 years, respectively), mean Gleason score and mean baseline serum testosterone did not significantly differ. Patients receiving ADT experienced a significant bone mass loss at 12 months in all locations, ranging from 2.29% to 5.55% (p <0.001). In contrast, bone mineral density did not change significantly (0.64% to 1.68%) in patients not receiving ADT. In the 20 patients on ADT after 24 months, the second year decrease was not as severe, nor was it significant compared to first year values. The major bone mass loss occurred in Ward's triangle, with decreases of 5.55% at 12 months and 7.05% at 24 months. CONCLUSIONS: Bone mineral density decreases during the first 24 months of androgen suppression with the most relevant effect occurring in the first year. Ward's triangle is the axial skeletal site that reflects the major bone mass loss. Because the deleterious impact of long-term androgen suppression on bone mineral density is inversely related to fracture risk and indirectly related to survival in patients with prostate cancer, early diagnosis and prevention of bone mass loss are warranted in these patients.     

The effect of androgen deprivation therapy on periodontal disease in men with prostate cancer

PURPOSE: We tested the hypothesis that men undergoing androgen deprivation therapy as treatment for prostate cancer are at greater risk for periodontitis and tooth loss. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 81 men with a mean age of 68.5 years who had prostate cancer were consecutively recruited among 325 enrolled in an academic osteoporosis study. Of these men 68 were eligible to participate in the research. The prevalence of periodontal disease in 41 men with prostate cancer undergoing androgen deprivation for a mean of 1.5 years was compared to that in 27 with prostate cancer not undergoing androgen deprivation, who served as controls. The prevalence of periodontal disease was examined in relation to bone mineral density in men with prostate cancer with and without androgen deprivation therapy. A periodontist (PF) blinded to androgen deprivation status recorded probing depth, clinical attachment level, bleeding, plaque scores, gingival recession, missing teeth and calculus. Logistic regression models were used to test the association between androgen deprivation therapy and periodontal disease. Linear regression models were used to assess the association between periodontal disease and bone mineral density in the 2 groups with prostate cancer (treated/untreated). We adjusted for variables known to influence periodontal disease, including patient age, race, smoking and periodontal disease history. RESULTS: The prevalence of periodontal disease was 80.5% in men on androgen deprivation therapy compared with 3.7% in those not on androgen deprivation therapy (OR 3.33, 95% CI 1.07-10.35). Men on androgen deprivation therapy had significantly greater probing depth and higher plaque scores (p<0.001 and <0.09, respectively). A total of 81 men (76.9%) completed bone mineral density examinations. There was no relationship between bone mineral density and periodontal disease. CONCLUSIONS: Men with prostate cancer undergoing androgen deprivation therapy were more likely to have periodontal disease than men not on androgen deprivation therapy. If confirmed in larger studies, this observation could have important public health implications, given the increasing use of androgen deprivation therapy to treat prostate cancer.     

Bone health in men receiving androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer

PURPOSE: Patients with recurrent or metastatic prostate cancer generally receive androgen deprivation therapy, which can result in significant loss of bone mineral density. We explored androgen deprivation therapy related bone loss in prostate cancer, current treatments and emerging therapies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Literature published on the pathogenesis and management of androgen deprivation therapy related bone loss was compiled and interpreted. Recent drug therapy findings were reviewed, including treatment guidelines. RESULTS: Men with prostate cancer often present with bone loss and the initiation of androgen deprivation therapy can trigger further rapid decreases. This results in an increased fracture risk, and greater morbidity and mortality. Early detection of osteoporosis through androgen deprivation therapy screening and prompt initiation of therapy are critical to prevent continued decreases. Lifestyle changes such as diet, supplementation and exercise can slow the rate of bone loss. Pharmacological therapy with oral and intravenous bisphosphonates has been demonstrated to prevent or decrease the bone loss associated with androgen deprivation therapy. However, important differences exist among various bisphosphonates with respect to efficacy, compliance and toxicity. Only zoledronic acid has been shown to increase bone mineral density above baseline and provide long-term benefit by decreasing the incidence of fracture and other skeletal related events in men with bone metastases. CONCLUSIONS: Androgen deprivation therapy associated bone loss adversely affects bone health, patient quality of life and survival in men with prostate cancer. Increased awareness of this issue, identification of risk factors, lifestyle modification and initiation of bisphosphonate therapy can improve outcomes. Education of patients and physicians regarding the importance of screening, prevention and treatment is essential.     

Failure after primary radiation or surgery for prostate cancer: differences in response to androgen ablation

PURPOSE: Androgen ablation is the standard treatment for recurrent and metastatic prostate cancer. Surprisingly few studies have documented the specific results for local and distant failure in patients treated primarily with radiation or radical prostatectomy. We report the long-term outcome of a series of those patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We followed until death 94 patients in whom primary radiation therapy failed and 67 in whom radical prostatectomy failed. All patients received androgen ablation. RESULTS: Statistically (p = 0.04) more patients in the radiation group (78%) died of prostate cancer than in the radical prostatectomy group (63%). Of the radiation group with local failure alone 63%, died of prostate cancer at a median of 5.03 years. Of the surgery group with isolated local failure 50% died of cancer at a median of 9.83 years. Of the patients treated with radiation with distant metastasis 93% died of cancer with a median time to death of 2.34 years. Of the patients treated with surgery 69% died of prostate cancer at a median of 3.27 years. The differences in survival between the 2 groups was significant. CONCLUSIONS: This study is unique in providing followup until death of patients treated with radical prostatectomy and radiation who had clinical failure and were treated with androgen ablation. Compelling is the finding that survival after androgen ablation after surgical failure is superior to that for radiation. If confirmed, this would be a significant consideration for future studies of patients in whom primary therapy fails.     

Reduced circulating androgen bioactivity in patients with prostate cancer

BACKGROUND: Previous studies on immunoreactive androgen levels in serum have revealed equivocal associations with the risk of prostate cancer (CaP). The aim of this study was to compare serum biological androgen activity between men with newly diagnosed CaP and age-matched men with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). METHODS: Caucasian men with newly diagnosed, untreated CaP (n = 101) and age-matched patients with BPH (n = 103) were investigated. Serum androgen bioactivity (ABA) levels were measured using a recently developed recombinant cell bioassay. RESULTS: In comparison to men with BPH, CaP patients with Gleason score >or=8 (n = 16) had lower serum ABA (P < 0.05), and patients with Gleason score or=8 (P = 0.07) displayed suppressed ABA levels in relation to serum testosterone. As the entire group, men with CaP (n = 101) had significantly lower serum ABA than age-matched men with BPH (n = 103): median 3.0 nM (range, 0.8-6.4 nM) versus 3.2 nM (range, 0.8-7.9 nM) testosterone equivalents, respectively (P < 0.005). By contrast, serum immunoreactive testosterone and SHBG concentrations and free androgen indices did not differ significantly between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CaP have lower serum ABA than controls with BPH, and men with low or high Gleason score display suppressed circulating ABA-to-testosterone ratio. These features may reflect interaction between variables such as the degree of tumor differentiation and tumor volume with androgen metabolism.     

Predictors of secondary cancer treatment in patients receiving local therapy for prostate cancer: data from cancer of the prostate strategic urologic research endeavor

PURPOSE: Secondary cancer treatment is common after definitive local therapy for prostate cancer and it may be an indicator of the efficacy and cost of primary local treatment. We determined predictors of secondary cancer treatment in patients initially treated with radical prostatectomy or external beam radiation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined 2,336 patients in Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor, a longitudinal registry of patients with prostate cancer, who underwent initial treatment with radical prostatectomy (1,744) or external beam radiation (592). Patients had at least 1 month of followup and all pretreatment information was available. The percent of patients receiving secondary cancer treatment, time to secondary treatment and type of secondary treatment delivered was determined. Multivariate analysis was done to determine independent predictors of secondary cancer treatment. In patients initially treated with prostatectomy a similar analysis was performed to identify predictors of receiving androgen deprivation versus radiation. RESULTS: A total of 590 patients (25%) received secondary cancer treatment, including prostatectomy in 391 (22%) and radiation in 199 (34%). Secondary cancer treatment was equally divided between radiation and androgen deprivation in 52% and 47%, respectively, of those initially treated with prostatectomy, while 92% initially treated with radiation received androgen deprivation. Predictors of any secondary treatment included patient age, biopsy Gleason score and prostate specific antigen at diagnosis. There was a trend toward increased secondary treatment more than 6 months after local therapy in patients initially treated with radiation. Increased age and lymph node metastases were independent predictors of receiving androgen deprivation after prostatectomy, while there was increased use of radiation in patients with positive surgical margins or extracapsular disease extension. CONCLUSIONS: Secondary treatment differs in patients initially treated with radical prostatectomy and radiation. Pretreatment factors can be used to counsel patients regarding the likelihood of secondary treatment, while age and prostatectomy results appear to determine the type of secondary treatment in those initially treated with prostatectomy.     

Her-2/neu expression in prostate cancer: high level of expression associated with exposure to hormone therapy and androgen independent disease

PURPOSE: HER-2/neu is a proto-oncogene that encodes a transmembrane receptor belonging to the family of epidermal growth factor receptors. Increasing evidences indicates that HER-2/neu may contribute to hormone resistance in prostate cancer. We investigated HER-2/neu expression in primary, androgen dependent and advanced androgen independent prostate cancer, and its potential value as a marker of disease progression. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Immunohistochemical testing was performed to investigate HER-2/neu expression in 81 patients with prostate cancer, including 31 with pathological stage C disease treated with radical prostatectomy without preoperative androgen ablation therapy (untreated group), 30 with pathological stage C disease treated before surgery with androgen ablation therapy (treated group) and 20 with advanced androgen independent prostate cancer (androgen independent group). Tumors were classified based on the percent of tumor cells showing HER-2/neu membrane immunoreactivity as low (50% or less) and high (50% or greater) expression. RESULTS: Of the 31 prostate tumors in the untreated group 9 (29%) showed high HER-2/neu expression versus 15 of 30 (50%) in the treated and 17 of 20 (85%) in the androgen independent groups. The difference in HER-2/neu expression was significant in the untreated and androgen independent (p <0.001) and in the treated and androgen independent (p = 0.016) groups. There was a significant association of Gleason score with HER-2/neu expression in the untreated group (p = 0.038) but not in the treated group. No association was found of tumor substage with HER-2/neu expression. In the untreated group patients with tumors showing high HER-2/neu expression had a decreased survival rate (p = 0.044). CONCLUSIONS: High HER-2/neu expression is highly associated with exposure to hormone therapy and androgen independence. It may contribute to androgen independence in prostate cancer and identify patients with prostate cancer more likely to have disease progression, particularly those not exposed to previous hormone therapy.     

前列腺癌去雄激素治疗不良反应的预防和处理

目的观察去雄激素治疗前列腺癌的不良反应,并探讨其预防和治疗。方法回顾性分析1998年7月-2006年1月112例去雄激素治疗晚期前列腺癌的临床资料。结果112例患者中,97例完成了不良反应的调查。随访3-36月,去雄激素治疗后潮热、性功能障碍、病理性骨折发生率分别为46％、75％、4％;患者潮热、精神疲乏、四肢乏力、纳差症状明显加重(P<0．05);性功能明显减退(P<0．05)。12例潮热症状严重者使用抗抑郁药博乐欣(25mg,tid)1-2周症状减轻。7例有骨转移性疼痛或严重骨质疏松患者,应用唑来膦酸4mg静脉滴注,每45d一次,骨痛症状缓解。结论去雄激素对前列腺癌患者生活质量有一定影响。博乐欣可减轻患者潮热症状,唑来膦酸可预防和治疗去雄激素相关的骨质疏松并发症。