Postmenopausal hormone use and secondary prevention of coronary events in the nurses' health study. a prospective, observational study.

BACKGROUND: The Heart and Estrogen/progestin Replacement Study (HERS) was the first randomized clinical trial of combined hormone therapy and secondary prevention of coronary events. The trial had overall null results but reported an unexpected increased risk for recurrent events in the initial year, followed by a decrease during the final years. OBJECTIVE: To provide additional data on a time trend in risk for recurrent heart disease. DESIGN: A prospective, observational cohort study of secondary prevention of coronary heart disease. SETTING: Nurses' Health Study. PATIENTS: 2489 postmenopausal women with previous myocardial infarction or documented atherosclerosis; 213 cases of recurrent nonfatal myocardial infarction or coronary death were identified from 1976 through 1996. MEASUREMENTS: Information on hormone status and on recurrent disease was collected by using biennial questionnaires. Multivariable-adjusted relative risks and 95% CIs were calculated from logistic regression models. RESULTS: A trend of decreasing risk for recurrent major coronary heart disease events with increasing duration of hormone use was observed (P for trend = 0.002). For short-term current users, the multivariate-adjusted relative risk for major coronary heart disease was 1.25 (95% CI, 0.78 to 2.00) compared with never-users. However, after longer-term hormone use, the rate of second events was lower in current users than in never-users (relative risk, 0.38 [CI, 0.22 to 0.66]). No clear differences emerged between users of estrogen alone and users of estrogen combined with progestin. Overall, with up to 20 years of follow-up, the relative risk for a second event among current users of hormone therapy was 0.65 (CI, 0.45 to 0.95) compared with never-users. CONCLUSIONS: The risk for recurrent major coronary events seems to increase among short-term hormone users with previous coronary disease but to decrease with longer-term use.     

Lipid changes on hormone therapy and coronary heart disease events in the Heart and Estrogen/progestin Replacement Study (HERS)

Background

Despite the effect of lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and raising high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels, combination hormone therapy did not reduce the incidence of coronary heart disease (CHD) events in the Heart and Estrogen/progestin Replacement Study (HERS). To explore possible mechanisms, we examined the association between lipid changes and CHD outcomes among women assigned to hormone therapy.

Methods

HERS participants were postmenopausal women with previously diagnosed CHD who were randomly assigned to receive conjugated estrogens and medroxyprogesterone or identical placebo and then followed-up for an average of 4.1 years. Among women assigned to hormone therapy, associations between baseline-to-year-1 lipid level changes and CHD events were compared with the associations observed for baseline lipids using multivariate proportional hazards models.

Results

Among women assigned to hormone therapy, CHD events were independently predicted by baseline LDL-C levels (relative hazard [RH] 0.94 per 15.6 mg/dL decrease, 95% CI 0.88-1.01) and HDL-C levels (RH 0.89 per 5.4 mg/dL increase, 95% CI 0.81-0.99), but not by triglyceride levels (RH 1.01 per 13.2mg/dL increase, 95% CI 0.97-1.06). CHD events were marginally associated with first-year reductions in LDL-C levels (RH 0.95 per 15.6mg/dL decrease, 95% CI 0.86-1.04), and were not associated with increases in HDL-C levels ( RH 1.03 per 5.4 mg/dL increase, 95% CI 0.91-1.16) or triglyceride levels (RH 1.01 per 13.2 mg/dL increase, 95% CI 0.98-1.05).

Conclusion

Changes in lipid levels with hormone therapy are not predictive of CHD outcomes in women with heart disease in the HERS trial.     

A prospective, observational study of postmenopausal hormone therapy and primary prevention of cardiovascular disease

BACKGROUND: Most primary prevention studies have found that long-term users of postmenopausal hormone therapy are at lower risk for coronary events, but numerous questions remain. An adverse influence of hormone therapy on cardiovascular risk has been suggested during the initial year of use; however, few data are available on short-term hormone therapy. In addition, the cardiovascular effects of daily doses of oral conjugated estrogen lower than 0.625 mg are unknown, and few studies have examined estrogen plus progestin in this regard. OBJECTIVE: To investigate duration, dose, and type of postmenopausal hormone therapy and primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. DESIGN: Prospective, observational cohort study. SETTING: Nurses' Health Study, with follow-up from 1976 to 1996. PATIENTS: 70 533 postmenopausal women, in whom 1258 major coronary events (nonfatal myocardial infarction or fatal coronary disease) and 767 strokes were identified. MEASUREMENTS: Details of postmenopausal hormone use were ascertained by using biennial questionnaires. Cardiovascular disease was established by using a questionnaire and was confirmed by medical record review. Logistic regression models were used to calculate relative risks and 95% CIs, adjusted for confounders. RESULTS: When all cardiovascular risk factors were considered, the risk for major coronary events was lower among current users of hormone therapy, including short-term users, compared with never-users (relative risk, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.52 to 0.71]). Among women taking oral conjugated estrogen, the risk for coronary events was similarly reduced in those currently taking 0.625 mg daily (relative risk, 0.54 [CI, 0.44 to 0.67]) and those taking 0.3 mg daily (relative risk, 0.58 [CI, 0. 37 to 0.92]) compared with never-users. However, the risk for stroke was statistically significantly increased among women taking 0.625 mg or more of oral conjugated estrogen daily (relative risk, 1.35 [CI, 1.08 to 1.68] for 0.625 mg/d and 1.63 [CI, 1.18 to 2.26] for >/=1.25 mg/d) and those taking estrogen plus progestin (relative risk, 1.45 [CI, 1.10 to 1.92]). Overall, little relation was observed between combination hormone therapy and risk for cardiovascular disease (major coronary heart disease plus stroke) (relative risk, 0.91 [CI, 0.75 to 1.11]). CONCLUSIONS: Postmenopausal hormone use appears to decrease risk for major coronary events in women without previous heart disease. Furthermore, 0.3 mg of oral conjugated estrogen daily is associated with a reduction similar to that seen with the standard dose of 0.625 mg. However, estrogen at daily doses of 0.625 mg or greater and in combination with progestin may increase risk for stroke.     

The incidence of unrecognized myocardial infarction in women with coronary heart disease

BACKGROUND: Several cohort studies in populations without coronary heart disease have demonstrated that up to 40% of incident myocardial infarctions are clinically unrecognized. OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of unrecognized myocardial infarction in women with coronary heart disease in the Heart and Estrogen/progestin Replacement Study (HERS). DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of conjugated estrogens plus medroxyprogesterone or identical placebo with 4.1 years of follow-up. SETTINGS: Outpatient and community settings at 20 U.S. clinical centers. PATIENTS: 2763 postmenopausal women younger than 80 years of age with coronary heart disease and an intact uterus. MEASUREMENTS: Annual electrocardiograms were obtained for all participants during follow-up (mean, 4.1 years) and were evaluated by using the NOVACODE computer algorithm and visual confirmation. A total of 13 715 electrocardiograms were obtained. Suspected unrecognized myocardial infarctions were investigated by comparing a participant's previous surveillance electrocardiograms with the electrocardiograms obtained from all of her intervening hospitalizations. Characteristics of patients with recognized and unrecognized myocardial infarction were compared. RESULTS: Among the 256 nonfatal myocardial infarctions, 11 were unrecognized (4.3% [95% CI, 2.2% to 7.6%]). Seven occurred in women assigned to placebo and 4 occurred in women assigned to hormone therapy (P > 0.2). Women with unrecognized myocardial infarction were less likely to have diabetes mellitus or previous angina and were more likely to have had previous bypass surgery compared with women who had clinically recognized myocardial infarction. CONCLUSION: The incidence of unrecognized myocardial infarction in women with coronary disease was far lower than that observed in previous studies of populations without coronary heart disease.     

Renal insufficiency and cardiovascular events in postmenopausal women with coronary heart disease

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine the independent association of renal insufficiency with cardiovascular risk among women with known coronary heart disease (CHD). BACKGROUND: Although patients with end-stage renal disease and proteinuria are at high risk for cardiovascular events, little is known about the cardiovascular risk associated with moderate renal insufficiency. METHODS: The Heart and Estrogen/progestin Replacement Study (HERS) was a clinical trial among 2,763 women with coronary disease who were randomized to conjugated estrogen plus progestins or identical placebo and followed for a mean of 4.1 years. Women were categorized as having normal renal function (creatinine < 1.2 mg/dl; n = 2,012), mild renal insufficiency (1.2 mg/dl to 1.4 mg/dl; n = 567) and moderate renal insufficiency (>1.4 mg/dl; n = 182). We examined the independent association of renal function with incident cardiovascular events including CHD death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, hospitalization for unstable angina, stroke and transient ischemic attacks. RESULTS: Compared with women with normal renal function, those with mild and moderate renal insufficiency were older, more likely to be black, have a history of hypertension and diabetes and have higher serum levels of triglycerides and lipoprotein(a). After multivariate adjustment, both mild (relative hazards [RH] = 1.24; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.0 to 1.5) and moderate renal insufficiency (RH = 1.57; 95% CI: 1.2 to 2.1) were independently associated with increased risk for cardiovascular events compared with women with normal renal function. CONCLUSIONS: Renal insufficiency is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular events in postmenopausal women with known coronary artery disease. Renal function may add helpful information to CHD risk stratification.     

Brief report: Coronary heart disease events associated with hormone therapy in younger and older women

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of hormone therapy (HT) on coronary heart disease (CHD) events in younger and older postmenopausal women. DESIGN: A comprehensive database search identified randomized-controlled trials of HT of at least 6 months' duration that reported CHD events, defined as myocardial infarction or cardiac death. MEASUREMENTS: The pooled odds ratios (ORs) for CHD events were reported separately for younger and older women, defined as participants with mean time from menopause of less than or greater than 10 years, or mean age less than or greater than 60 years. MAIN RESULTS: Pooled data from 23 trials, with 39,049 participants followed for 191,340 patient-years, showed that HT significantly reduced CHD events in younger women (OR 0.68 [confidence interval (C I), 0.48 to 0.96]), but not in older women (OR 1.03 [CI, 0.91 to 1.16]). Hormone therapy reduced events in younger women compared with older women (OR 0.66 [CI, 0.46 to 0.95]). In older women, HT increased events in the first year (OR 1.47 [CI, 1.12 to 1.92]), then reduced events after 2 years (OR 0.79 [CI, 0.67 to 0.93]). CONCLUSIONS: Hormone therapy reduces the risk of CHD events in younger postmenopausal women. In older women, HT increases, then decreases risk over time.     

The HERS trial results: paradigms lost? Heart and Estrogen/progestin Replacement Study.

The Heart and Estrogen/progestin Replacement Study (HERS) found no overall effect of 4.1 years of therapy with estrogen plus progestin for secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in postmenopausal women. However, within the overall null effect, a 50% increase in cardiovascular events was seen in the first year, followed by fewer events after 2 years of treatment in the hormone therapy group than in the placebo group. Understanding the cause of this pattern of early increase and late reduction in risk is key to interpreting the HERS results and reconciling them with the large number of observational and other studies of the cardiovascular effects of estrogen. There are two possibilities. One is that the HERS regimen of estrogen plus progestin has no effect on risk for heart disease, and the pattern of changing risk over time is simply the result of chance or confounding. The other is that the pattern of early increase and late reduction in risk is due to real but opposing effects of this regimen. Several lines of evidence support each possibility. Attrition of a susceptible cohort of women uniquely at risk for a cardiovascular complication from hormone therapy coupled with a gradually progressive beneficial effect due to lipid lowering and other factors is a promising potential explanation. The HERS results remind us of the need for clinical trials to evaluate both the benefits and risks of new therapies. They also illustrate how much more we need to know about the cardiovascular effects of hormone replacement therapy.     

Hormone replacement therapy and cardiovascular risk

We are reexamining the role of hormone replacement therapy in cardiovascular risk in light of the results from the Heart and Estrogen/Progestin Replacement Study (HERS) trial. Prior to this trial, the wealth of evidence in the laboratory and in observational trials suggested that estrogen replacement was associated with significant cardioprotection. The HERS trial was the first randomized trial of this therapy in postmenopausal women with coronary artery disease, and it did not demonstrate a reduction in cardiovascular events in women taking hormone replacement therapy. These findings have made us rethink some of the basic science underlying the cardiovascular effects of hormone replacement therapy. Recent evidence regarding thromboembolic risk, inflammation, and types of hormone replacement therapy is discussed.     

Hormone replacement therapy in clinical cardiology

The relationship between coronary heart disease (CHD) and menopause remains controversial, but observational studies of hormone replacement therapy among postmenopausal women have found a lower risk of CHD among women taking postmenopausal estrogens or estrogen/progestin combination therapy. In contrast, the Heart and Estrogen/progestin Replacement Study (HERS) did not show any overall benefit of estrogen/progestin therapy over 4.1 years of follow-up in a sample of women with established CHD, despite the expected favorable changes in the participants' lipid profiles. There appeared to be an initial increase in CHD risk, but benefit with increasing duration of hormone use. More research on the relative benefits and risks of hormone replacement therapy in postmenopausal women is needed. For now, a cautionary approach to hormone replacement therapy appears warranted, at least among postmenopausal women with established coronary artery disease.     

The effect of estrogen plus progestin on knee symptoms and related disability in postmenopausal women: The Heart and Estrogen/Progestin Replacement Study, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: Most observational studies suggest that postmenopausal women taking hormone replacement therapy have a reduced risk of radiographic knee and hip osteoarthritis (OA). There are no randomized trial data on the association of hormone treatment with knee or hip OA, and no studies have been published regarding the relationship of hormone treatment to knee or hip symptoms. This study examined the association of hormone treatment with prevalent knee symptoms and disability related to knee pain as assessed at the final visit of the Heart and Estrogen/Progestin Replacement Study (HERS). METHODS: The HERS was a 4-year randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of estrogen plus medroxy progesterone acetate for prevention of coronary heart disease in postmenopausal women with documented coronary disease. Participants in this substudy on knee pain were 969 postmenopausal women, with a mean age of 66 years and mean body mass index of 28.6 kg/m2, attending the final visit at 9 clinical centers. Frequent knee symptoms were assessed by interview and the severity of knee pain and disability related to knee pain were determined using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). Knee symptoms and disability were compared between women assigned to receive hormones and those assigned to receive placebo. RESULTS: Frequent knee pain was reported in 24.1% of women assigned to receive hormone therapy versus 26.1% of those assigned to the placebo group, a difference of -2.0% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] -7.4% to 3.5%). Among women with knee pain, there were no differences in the severity of pain (score difference -0.2, 95% CI -1.2 to 0.8) or disability (score difference -0.7, 95% CI -3.8 to 2.4) as assessed on the WOMAC. All results were similar for women whose body mass index was either above or below the median. CONCLUSION: In a group of older, postmenopausal women with cardiac disease, we found no significant effect of 4 years of estrogen plus progestin therapy compared with placebo on knee pain and related disability. Our findings may not apply to other groups of women or to the effect of hormone therapy on the structural changes of knee OA.     

Lessons from hormone replacement therapy trials for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Coronary heart disease in women is a common cause of morbidity and mortality, particularly after menopause. It was thought that estrogen and progesterone protected women from coronary heart disease. The recommendations of the recent Women's Health Initiative, however, are that hormone replacement therapy should not be used for primary prevention of coronary heart disease in women. Here, we have made a comprehensive review of major studies and comment on the validity of this recommendation. We have also analyzed the importance of dietary modification in primary prevention. In addition, we have delineated the important predictors of cardiovascular disease in women from prior observational and clinical studies. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent major studies, including the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) and Heart and Estrogen/Progestin Replacement Study (HERS), studied the role of hormone replacement therapy in protecting women from coronary heart disease. These studies showed no significant reduction in coronary heart disease events. In addition, the dietary modification component of the Women's Health Initiative did not show any significant reduction in the incidence of coronary heart disease. SUMMARY: It can be summarized that hormone replacement is not generally recommended in postmenopausal women for primary prevention of coronary heart disease. Although the dietary modification trials did not show any significant reduction in the incidence of coronary heart disease, it is currently recommended to continue using a heart-healthy diet.     

Primary risk factors influence risk of recurrent myocardial infarction/death from coronary heart disease: results from the Stockholm Heart Epidemiology Program (SHEEP).

BACKGROUND: Prognosis after a first myocardial infarction (MI) is influenced by primary risk factors as well as secondary risk factors. There is still a lack of follow-up studies of well-characterized patient cohorts assessing the relative importance of these factors. DESIGN: A cohort of 1635 patients (aged 45-70 years) surviving at least 28 days after a first MI were followed for 6-9 years with regard to recurrent MI/fatal coronary heart disease (CHD). Data were collected through questionnaires, physical examinations, and medical records. METHODS: Hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for different risk factors were calculated using the Cox proportional hazard model. RESULTS: Of the primary risk factors, diabetes in both sexes was the most important predictor of recurrent MI/fatal CHD, multivariate-adjusted HR in men 1.6 (95% CI; 1.0-2.4) and in women 2.5 (95% CI; 0.9-6.9). Other primary risk factors with prognostic influence were job strain, HR 1.5 (95% CI; 1.0-2.1), and central obesity, HR 1.4 (95% CI; 1.0-2.0), in men and a low level of apolipoprotein A1, HR 2.3 (95% CI; 1.1-5.0), and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, HR 1.9 (95% CI; 0.9-4.1), in women. The secondary risk factors most detrimental for prognosis were heart failure in men, HR 2.2 (95% CI; 1.2-4.0), and a high peak acute cardiac enzyme level in women, HR 4.4 (95% CI; 2.0-9.7). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term follow-up of patients who survived at least 28 days after a first MI shows that several primary cardiovascular risk factors, particularly diabetes, contribute to the increased risk of recurrent MI/fatal CHD.     

Cardiovascular risk in women with non-specific chest pain (from the Women's Health Initiative Hormone Trials)

Women discharged with diagnoses of nonspecific chest pain (NSCP) may be at increased risk for subsequent coronary artery disease (CAD) events. The influence of hormone therapy on NSCP is unknown. The Women's Health Initiative (WHI) enrolled postmenopausal women aged 50 to 79 years. The duration of follow-up was 7.1 years in the WHI Estrogen-Alone trial (E-Alone) and 5.6 years in the WHI Estrogen Plus Progestin trial (E+P). After excluding women with previous cardiovascular disease, 9,427 women in E-Alone and 15,105 women in E+P were included in this analysis. NSCP, defined as having a primary hospital discharge diagnosis of NSCP by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, code, was reported in 322 women in E-Alone and 249 in E+P. Risks for subsequent CAD events were estimated using intent-to-treat Cox proportional-hazards models stratified by clinic and adjusted for age and other risk factors. In the fully adjusted models of the combined trials, women with NSCP had a twofold greater risk for subsequent nonfatal CAD events, including nonfatal myocardial infarction (2.3% vs 1.7%, hazard ratio [HR] 2.10, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11 to 3.98), revascularization (3.5% vs 2.6%, HR 1.99, 95% CI 1.20 to 3.30), and hospitalized angina (3.7% vs 2.3%, HR 2.39, 95% CI 1.46 to 3.92). Hormone therapy did not appear to have a significant effect on either the incidence of NSCP hospitalizations (E-Alone: HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.32; E+P: HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.02) or the risk for a subsequent CAD event. In conclusion, a hospitalization for NSCP doubles the risk for a subsequent CAD event in postmenopausal women over the next 5 to 7 years and identifies them as candidates for aggressive risk factor treatment.     

Kidney dysfunction and sudden cardiac death among women with coronary heart disease

We evaluated the association between kidney dysfunction and sudden cardiac death risk among ambulatory women with coronary heart disease. The Heart and Estrogen Replacement Study evaluated the effects of hormone treatment on cardiovascular events among 2763 postmenopausal women with coronary heart disease. Kidney dysfunction was categorized by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation. Multivariate proportional hazards models were used to adjust for cardiovascular risk factors, congestive heart failure, and myocardial infarction. At baseline, 37% (n=1027) had an eGFR of >60 mL/min, 54% (n=1503) had an eGFR of 40 to 60 mL/min, and 8% (n=230) had an eGFR of <40 mL/min. During the 6.8-year follow-up period, there were 136 adjudicated sudden cardiac deaths. The rate of sudden cardiac death was higher in those with lower kidney function (0.5% per year among those with an eGFR >60; 0.6% per year with an eGFR between 40 and 60; and 1.7% per year with an eGFR <40 mL/min; P for trend <0.001). After multivariate analysis with baseline risk factors, eGFR at 40 to 60 mL/min was not a significant predictor, but eGFR at <40 mL/min remained strongly associated with sudden cardiac death (hazard ratio: 3.2; 95% CI: 1.9 to 5.3); adjustment for incident congestive heart failure and myocardial infarction during follow-up diminished this association (hazard ratio: 2.3; 95% CI: 1.3 to 3.9), suggesting that congestive heart failure and myocardial infarction mediated only part of the association between kidney dysfunction and sudden cardiac death. Advanced kidney dysfunction is an independent predictor of sudden cardiac death among women with coronary heart disease.     

Fracture and the risk of coronary events in women with heart disease

BACKGROUND: Osteoporosis is associated with aortic calcification and cardiovascular mortality. However, whether skeletal fractures predict the risk of coronary events is unknown. METHODS: We used Cox proportional hazards models to determine whether postmenopausal fracture was associated with the risk of coronary heart disease events among the 2763 postmenopausal women with known coronary disease enrolled in the Heart and Estrogen/progestin Replacement Study. Because fractures occurred before enrollment (in 615 women) and during follow-up (in 276 women), we treated incident fracture as a time-dependent covariate in our models. RESULTS: During a mean follow-up of 4.1 years, 361 women had coronary heart disease events. The risk of these events was 25% lower in women who sustained fractures than in those without fractures (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.57 to 0.96; P = 0.02). This association was not confounded by physical activity or by factors associated with both fracture and coronary heart disease events (HR = 0.75; 95% CI: 0.57 to 0.98; P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Postmenopausal women with heart disease who had skeletal fractures had a reduced risk of subsequent coronary events. This unexpected association, if confirmed in future studies, could influence risk-related treatment strategies for cardiovascular disease.     

Homocysteine and major coronary events: a prospective population study amongst women

OBJECTIVES: To study serum homocysteine concentration for its prediction of major coronary heart disease events amongst women. DESIGN: A case-control study nested within a follow-up study. Subjects. A total of 74 and 75 major coronary events (coronary deaths or nonfatal myocardial infarction) which occurred in women with and without known heart disease, respectively, during a 13-year follow-up and two individually matched controls per case. Main outcome measure. Major coronary event. RESULTS: Amongst women with baseline heart disease, the relative risk (95% CI) of such events, adjusted for age, smoking, hypertension, diabetes, serum cholesterol and body mass index, was 3.32 (1.05-10.5) in the highest homocysteine quintile compared with the lowest quintile. Amongst women free of heart disease at baseline, the corresponding relative risk value was 0.77 (0.24-2.45). CONCLUSIONS: This prospective study support the hypothesis that homocysteine is a risk factor for coronary events in women with heart disease.     

Conjugated equine estrogens and coronary heart disease: the Women's Health Initiative

BACKGROUND: In recent randomized trials, conjugated equine estrogens (CEE) with continuous medroxyprogesterone acetate provided no protection against coronary heart disease in postmenopausal women and may have increased cardiac risk. These trials did not address the role of unopposed estrogen for coronary protection. METHODS: A total of 10 739 women aged 50 to 79 years at baseline (mean age, 63.6 years) who had previously undergone hysterectomy were randomized to receive CEE, 0.625 mg/d, or placebo at 40 US clinical centers beginning in 1993. The trial was terminated early after 6.8 years of follow-up (planned duration, 8.5 years). This report includes final, centrally adjudicated results for the primary efficacy outcome (myocardial infarction or coronary death), secondary coronary outcomes, and subgroup analyses. RESULTS: During the active intervention period, 201 coronary events were confirmed among women assigned to receive CEE compared with 217 events among women assigned to receive placebo (hazard ratio, 0.95; nominal 95% confidence interval, 0.79-1.16). Among women aged 50 to 59 years at baseline, the hazard ratio for the primary outcome was 0.63 (nominal 95% confidence interval, 0.36-1.08). In that age group, coronary revascularization was less frequent among women assigned to receive CEE (hazard ratio, 0.55; nominal 95% confidence interval, 0.35-0.86), as were several composite outcomes, which included the primary outcome and coronary revascularization (hazard ratio, 0.66; nominal 95% confidence interval, 0.44-0.97). CONCLUSIONS: Conjugated equine estrogens provided no overall protection against myocardial infarction or coronary death in generally healthy postmenopausal women during a 7-year period of use. There was a suggestion of lower coronary heart disease risk with CEE among women 50 to 59 years of age at baseline.     

Smoking cessation and risk of myocardial reinfarction in coronary patients: a nested case-control study

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Smoking cessation reduces mortality in coronary patients. The aim of this study was to estimate association measures between the risk of occurrence of fatal or non-fatal reinfarction in patients who either continue to smoke or stop after a first infarction and are treated with secondary prevention measures. PATIENTS AND METHOD: The study was a case-control (1:1) design nested in a cohort of 985 coronary patients under the age of 76 years who were not treated with invasive procedures and survived more than 6 months after the first acute myocardial infarction. Cases were all patients who suffered reinfarction (n = 137) between 1997 and 2000. A control patient was matched with each case by gender, age, hospital, interviewer, and the secondary prevention timeframe. RESULTS: Patients who smoke after the first acute myocardial infarction had an Odds ratio (OR) of 2.83 (95% CI, 1.47-5.47) for a new acute myocardial infarction. Adjustment for lifestyle, drug treatment, and risk factors (family history of coronary disease, high blood pressure, hypercholesterolemia, and diabetes mellitus) did not change the OR (2.80 [95% CI, 1.35-5.80]). Patients who quit smoking had an adjusted OR of 0.90 (95% CI, 0.47-1.71) compared with non-smokers before the first acute myocardial infarction. Continued smoking had an adjusted OR of 2.90 (95% CI, 1.35-6.20) compared to quitting after the first acute myocardial infarction. CONCLUSION: The risk of acute myocardial infarctions is three times higher in patients who continue to smoke after an acute coronary event compared with patients who quit. The risk of reinfarction in patients who stop smoking is similar to the risk of non-smokers before the first infarction.     

Fifteen percent of myocardial infarctions and coronary revascularizations explained by family history unrelated to conventional risk factors. The Reykjavik Cohort Study.

Aims To examine the relationship between history of myocardial infarction in first-degree relatives and the risk of developing coronary heart disease (myocardial infarction or coronary revascularization).Methods and Results A total of 9328 males and 10062 females, randomly selected residents of the Reykjavik area, aged 33-81 years, were examined in the period from 1967 to 1996 in a prospective cohort study. Cardiovascular risk assessment was based on characteristics at baseline. Information on history of myocardial infarction in first-degree relatives was obtained from a health questionnaire. Mean follow-up was 18 and 19 years for men and women, respectively. During follow-up 2700 men and 1070 women developed coronary heart disease. Compared with subjects without a family history, the hazard ratio of coronary heart disease was 1.75 (95% confidence interval, CI, 1.59-1.92) for men and 1.83 (95% CI, 1.60-2.11) for women, with one or more first-degree relatives with myocardial infarction. The risk factor profile was significantly worse in individuals with a positive family history. After allowance for these risk factors, the hazard ratio was still highly significant, 1.66 (CI, 1.51-1.82) and 1.64 (CI, 1.43-1.89) for men and women, respectively. Family history of myocardial infarction was attributed to 15.1% of all cases of coronary heart disease in men and 16.6% in women, independent of other known risk factors.Conclusion Family history of myocardial infarction increases the risk of developing coronary heart disease in both men and women and is largely independent of other classic risk factors. Approximately 15% of all myocardial infarctions can be attributed to familial factors that have not been measured in the study or remain to be elucidated.     

The effect of estrogen plus progestin on knee symptoms and related disability in postmenopausal women: The heart and estrogen/progestin replacement study,a randomized,double‐blind,placebo‐controlled trial

Objective

Most observational studies suggest that postmenopausal women taking hormone replacement therapy have a reduced risk of radiographic knee and hip osteoarthritis (OA). There are no randomized trial data on the association of hormone treatment with knee or hip OA, and no studies have been published regarding the relationship of hormone treatment to knee or hip symptoms. This study examined the association of hormone treatment with prevalent knee symptoms and disability related to knee pain as assessed at the final visit of the Heart and Estrogen/Progestin Replacement Study (HERS).

Methods

The HERS was a 4‐year randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial of estrogen plus medroxy progesterone acetate for prevention of coronary heart disease in postmenopausal women with documented coronary disease. Participants in this substudy on knee pain were 969 postmenopausal women, with a mean age of 66 years and mean body mass index of 28.6 kg/m², attending the final visit at 9 clinical centers. Frequent knee symptoms were assessed by interview and the severity of knee pain and disability related to knee pain were determined using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). Knee symptoms and disability were compared between women assigned to receive hormones and those assigned to receive placebo.

Results

Frequent knee pain was reported in 24.1% of women assigned to receive hormone therapy versus 26.1% of those assigned to the placebo group, a difference of −2.0% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] −7.4% to 3.5%). Among women with knee pain, there were no differences in the severity of pain (score difference −0.2, 95% CI −1.2 to 0.8) or disability (score difference −0.7, 95% CI −3.8 to 2.4) as assessed on the WOMAC. All results were similar for women whose body mass index was either above or below the median.

Conclusion

In a group of older, postmenopausal women with cardiac disease, we found no significant effect of 4 years of estrogen plus progestin therapy compared with placebo on knee pain and related disability. Our findings may not apply to other groups of women or to the effect of hormone therapy on the structural changes of knee OA.