Neostigmine and edrophonium as antagonists of atracurium and pancuronium

Edrophonium 0.5 mg/kg or neostigmine 0.04 mg/kg were administered to two groups of 30 patients each for antagonism of atracurium- or pancuronium-induced neuromuscular block at 25% single twitch recovery. Neuromuscular block was studied using both single twitch and train-of-four (TOF) nerve stimulation. The times to 100% single twitch recovery were significantly more rapid for patients receiving edrophonium (P less than 0.01) in both groups (atracurium and pancuronium); the TOF ratios were similar for atracurium, but for pancuronium they were greater after neostigmine than after edrophonium, and only at 25 min were these ratios similar. It is concluded that edrophonium in a dose of 0.5 mg/kg antagonizes neuromuscular blockade induced by atracurium, as does neostigmine in a dose of 0.04 mg/kg, but the former does not consistently antagonize neuromuscular blockade induced by pancuronium even at 25% of single twitch recovery.     

Edrophonium and Neostigmine for Reversal of the Neuromuscular Blocking Effect of Vecuronium

The effect of edrophonium for reversal of the non-depolarizing neuromuscular blockade produced by a continuous infusion of vecuronium was compared to that of neostigmine in 20 adult patients during neurolept anaesthesia. When antagonism was attempted at 10% twitch height recovery, reversal time to a train-of-four ratio of 0.7 was significantly shorter following neostigmine 0.04 mg/kg than after edrophonium 0.75 mg/kg (9.8 min and 18.7 min, respectively) but the same after edrophonium 1.5 mg/kg (10.3 min). There was no statistically significant difference in reversal time between neostigmine 0.04 mg/kg given at 10% twitch height and edrophonium 0.75 mg/kg given at 25% twitch height recovery (6.0 min). Additional doses of atropine were necessary following edrophonium 1.5 mg/kg.     

Dose-response curves for edrophonium, neostigmine, and pyridostigmine after pancuronium and d-tubocurarine

To determine the potencies of neostigmine, pyridostigmine, and edrophonium in reversing pancuronium and d-tubocurarine blockade, dose-response curves were established for first twitch height recovery and train-of-four ratio. One hundred and twenty ASA physical status I or II patients scheduled for elective surgery received either 0.06 mg/kg pancuronium or 0.36 mg/kg d-tubocurarine during a thiopental-nitrous oxide-enflurane anesthetic. Train-of-four stimulation was applied every 12 s, and the force of contraction of the adductor pollicis muscle was recorded. When first twitch height had recovered spontaneously to 10% of its initial value, neostigmine (0.005, 0.01, 0.02 or 0.05 mg/kg), pyridostigmine (0.02, 0.04, 0.1, or 0.2 mg/kg), or edrophonium (0.1, 0.2, 0.4 or 1 mg/kg) was injected by random allocation. Recovery was measured 10 min after the injection of the antagonist. First twitch ED50's were 0.013, 0.085, and 0.17 mg/kg after pancuronium, and 0.017, 0.11, and 0.27 mg/kg after d-tubocurarine, for neostigmine, pyridostigmine, and edrophonium, respectively. The ED50 for pyridostigmine and edrophonium obtained after d-tubocurarine was significantly larger (P less than 0.05) than that after pancuronium. The train-of-four dose-response curves were significantly flatter for edrophonium than for the other two agents, indicating a greater ability of edrophonium to antagonize fade at low doses. It is concluded that the potency of reversal agents may be different for different relaxants, and that potency ratios might depend upon the end-point chosen as full neuromuscular recovery.     

Reversal of pancuronium

Moderate to deep (67-99% single twitch depression) pancuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade was antagonised with neostigmine (30 micrograms/kg, 60 micrograms/kg, or 80 micrograms/kg) in combination with glycopyrronium. Twenty-seven patients were reversed from 91%-99% twitch depression. Recovery of the first twitch of a train-of-four to 95% of control twitch took at least 20 minutes with neostigmine 30 micrograms/kg. The higher doses were significantly faster (60 micrograms/kg p less than 0.05, 80 micrograms/kg p less than 0.01) and took 15.8 and 14.8 minutes respectively. Reversal to a train of four ratio of 0.75 was not consistently achieved in under 30 minutes with any dose of neostigmine. Nineteen patients were antagonised from a 67%-80% depression of first twitch and in all but two recovery to 95% of control took under 10 minutes. To achieve a train of four ratio of 0.75 took less than 12.5 minutes except in three patients, two of whom, both given neostigmine 30 micrograms/kg, took longer than 20 minutes. Neostigmine 60 micrograms/kg produced as rapid a degree of antagonism as 80 micrograms/kg. Heart rates after reversal decreased gradually in all groups, although the decrease was initially greater in the low dose neostigmine (30 micrograms/kg) group. A fixed 5:1 ratio of neostigmine and glycopyrronium will usually antagonise a moderate (70%-80%) pancuronium block to a train of four of greater than 75% within 12.5 minutes if at least 60 micrograms/kg of neostigmine is administered. More than 30 minutes may be required for reversal whatever the dose of neostigmine, for antagonism from greater than 90% twitch depression.     

Dose-response relationships for edrophonium and neostigmine as antagonists of atracurium and vecuronium neuromuscular blockade

To determine the potencies of edrophonium and neostigmine as antagonists of nondepolarizing neuromuscular blockade produced by atracurium and vecuronium, dose-response curves were constructed for both antagonists when given at 10% spontaneous recovery of first twitch height. Ninety ASA physical status 1 and 2 adults were given either 0.4 mg/kg atracurium or 0.08 mg/kg vecuronium during thiopental-nitrous oxide-enflurane anesthesia. Train-of-four stimulation was applied to the ulnar nerve every 12 s, and the force of contraction of the adductor pollicis muscle was recorded. When spontaneous recovery of first twitch height reached 10% of its initial control value, edrophonium (0.1, 0.2, 0.4, or 1 mg/kg) or neostigmine (0.005, 0.01, 0.02, or 0.05 mg/kg) was administered by random allocation. Neuromuscular function in another ten subjects was allowed to recover spontaneously. Assisted recovery was defined as actual recovery minus mean spontaneous recovery observed in patients who were not given antagonists. First twitch recovery was initially more rapid when vecuronium was antagonized compared with atracurium, but no difference was detected after 10 min. At 10 min the neostigmine ED80 was 0.022 +/- 0.003 (SEM) mg/kg after atracurium and 0.024 +/- 0.003 mg/kg after vecuronium. The edrophonium ED80 was 0.44 +/- 0.11 mg/kg with atracurium and 0.46 +/- 0.12 mg/kg with vecuronium, giving a neostigmine:edrophonium potency ratio of 20. Atracurium train-of-four fade could be antagonized more easily with edrophonium, whereas that of vecuronium was more easily antagonized by neostigmine. It is concluded that edrophonium and neostigmine are not equally effective against atracurium and vecuronium.     

Recovery times following edrophonium and neostigmine reversal of pancuronium, atracurium, and vecuronium steady-state infusions

The ability of edrophonium and neostigmine to antagonize nondepolarizing neuromuscular blockade produced by steady-state infusions of atracurium, pancuronium, and vecuronium was studied in 71 adult patients anesthetized with nitrous oxide and halothane. Infusion rates of blocking drugs were adjusted so that single twitch depression as measured by the evoked integrated EMG of the hypothenar muscles was kept at 10% of control. Two minutes after the termination of the infusion either edrophonium (0.75 mg/kg) or neostigmine (0.05 mg/kg) was administered. Single twitch depression and train-of-four (T4/T1) fade was recorded during the recovery period. T4/T1 fade ratios observed at 20 min postreversal were 0.80 (atracurium-edrophonium); 0.76 (vecuronium-edrophonium); 0.44 (pancuronium-edrophonium); 0.95 (atracurium-neostigmine); 0.89 (vecuronium-neostigmine); and 0.68 (pancuronium-neostigmine). Under conditions of this study neostigmine produced more rapid and complete recovery than did edrophonium. Although edrophonium produced adequate antagonism of atracurium if 20-30 min were allowed to elapse, edrophonium reversal of pancuronium was rarely acceptable even at 30 min. Increasing the dose of edrophonium to 1.0 mg/kg produced single twitch values of 0.90 at 5 min postreversal but did not increase the rate of recovery of the train-of-four fade ratio. Neostigmine reversal of pancuronium, on the other hand, generally produced T4/T1 ratios of greater than 0.70 in 20-30 min. Although the pattern of recovery seen after reversal of vecuronium was in general quite similar to that seen after atracurium, two patients in the vecuronium-edrophonium group showed delayed recovery and also failed to respond significantly to subsequent doses of neostigmine.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Dose-response relationships for edrophonium and neostigmine as antagonists of moderate and profound atracurium blockade

To measure the ability of neostigmine and edrophonium to reverse moderate and profound atracurium blockade, dose-response relationships were established for these reversal agents given at 1% and 10% twitch height recovery. Eighty-five ASA I and II adult patients received atracurium, 0.4 mg/kg, during a thiopental-nitrous oxide-enflurane anesthetic. Train-of-four stimulation was applied every 12 seconds, and the force of contraction of the adductor pollicis muscle was recorded. Edrophonium, 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, or 1 mg/kg; neostigmine, 0.005, 0.01, 0.02 or 0.05 mg/kg; or no reversal agent was given when there was either 1% or 10% recovery of the first twitch response. With profound blockade, the slope of the edrophonium dose-response relationship was significantly flatter (P less than 0.05) than that of neostigmine. The dose of neostigmine required to achieve 80% first twitch recovery (ED80) after 10 minutes was 0.013 +/- 0.003 mg/kg (mean +/- SEM) if given at 10% recovery, and 0.032 +/- 0.004 mg/kg if given at 1% recovery. The ED80 for edrophonium was 0.22 +/- 0.04 mg/kg and 1.14 +/- 0.33 mg/kg, respectively. These values corresponded to neostigmine:edrophonium potency ratios of 16.6 +/- 3.5 and 35.3 +/- 8.9 at 90% and 99% blockade respectively (P less than 0.006). We conclude that the relative potency of neostigmine is greater than that of edrophonium for antagonism of profound atracurium blockade.     

Impairment of the antagonism of vecuronium-induced paralysis and intra-operative disopyramide administration

A 63-year-old male was admitted to hospital for a cholecystectomy, vagotomy and gastro-enterostomy. Muscle paralysis was induced with 70 micrograms/kg vecuronium, followed by increments of 20 micrograms/kg when the initial twitch height returned to 25% of control. The patient received 3 doses of 10 mg disopyramide intravenously, on account of supraventricular ectopic beats, followed by an infusion of 25 mg/hour. Paralysis was reversed using 0.75 mg atropine and 2.5 mg neostigmine once the twitch height had returned spontaneously to 25% of its initial value. Fifteen minutes later, twitch height had returned to control value and the train-of-four was above 85%, but the responses to tetanic stimulation at 100 Hz and 50 Hz remained severely depressed (10% and 45%, respectively). The patient's trachea was extubated after 20 minutes, but residual fade was still observed. This impairment of neuromuscular transmission, detected only with high frequency stimulation, was present with a measured concomitant plasma level of disopyramide of 5.1 micrograms/ml.     

Twitch depression and train-of-four ratio after antagonism of pancuronium with edrophonium, neostigmine, or pyridostigmine

During N2O-O2-halothane anesthesia pancuronium (3 mg/70 kg) was antagonized with neostigmine (2.5 or 5 mg/70 kg), pyridostigmine (10 or 20 mg/70 kg), or edrophonium (50 or 100 mg/70 kg) in 36 human subjects (6 in each group). Reversal was attempted at 10% spontaneous recovery of muscle twitch, which was measured using train-of-four stimulation. When first twitch tension was less than 70% of the control it was found that for the same tension, the train-of-four ratio was greater with edrophonium than with neostigmine, and greater with neostigmine than with pyridostigmine. It was concluded that the three antagonists have different mechanisms of action. In comparison with neostigmine, edrophonium is more and pyridostigmine is less effective at presynaptic (or fade) receptors.     

Profound atracurium induced neuromuscular blockade

Speed of reversal of profound atracurium induced neuromuscular blockade following edrophonium (0.5 or 1.0 mg/kg) or neostigmine (0.04 or 0.08 mg/kg) was measured using the train-of-four pattern of nerve stimulation. In all patients adequate clinical reversal was present when the ratio of the strength of the fourth to the first twitch (T4 ratio) was 0.5. Both doses of edrophonium were associated with a significantly faster speed of reversal than the smaller dose of neostigmine (p less than 0.05 in both cases). However, the larger dose of neostigmine was associated with a reversal time approaching that of edrophonium. Possible explanations for these findings are discussed in terms of contemporary theories of neuromuscular pharmacology.     

Neostigmine and edrophonium antagonism of varying intensity neuromuscular blockade induced by atracurium, pancuronium, or vecuronium

To compare the time course of neostigmine and edrophonium antagonism of varying intensity neuromuscular blockade induced by atracurium, pancuronium, or vecuronium, the authors studied 98 patients anesthetized with nitrous oxide (60%) and halothane or enflurane. Neuromuscular blockade, as monitored by single stimulus-induced twitch tension (TT), was antagonized at varying degrees of spontaneous recovery (2-80% of control TT). Time to antagonism (time from injection of neostigmine or edrophonium to 90% recovery of control TT) was not different between edrophonium, 0.5 mg/kg, and neostigmine, 0.04 mg/kg, when spontaneous recovery had been allowed to occur to at least 11% of control TT prior to antagonist administration (P greater than 0.05). For profound neuromuscular blockade (TT less than or equal to 10% of control) induced by pancuronium or vecuronium, time (mean +/- SD) to antagonism with neostigmine, 0.04 mg/kg, was 7.0 +/- 2.2 min and 5.6 +/- 1.7 min, respectively, while the same for edrophonium, 0.5 mg/kg, was 20.0 +/- 8.0 min and 15.0 +/- 12.5 min, respectively (P less than 0.05). Time to antagonism of profound atracurium-induced neuromuscular blockade was 8.5 +/- 3.3 min for neostigmine, 0.04 mg/kg, and 9.8 +/- 7.0 min for edrophonium, 0.5 mg/kg, (P less than 0.05). For profound vecuronium-and pancuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade, time to antagonism by edrophonium, 1.0 mg/kg, was 4.6 +/- 3.0 min and 3.9 +/- 1.6 min respectively. The authors conclude that neostigmine, 0.04 mg/kg, antagonizes neuromuscular blockade within 12 min when TT is greater than 2% of control at time of reversal. When TT is greater than 10% of control, edrophonium, 0.5 mg/kg, produces similar time to antagonism.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Antagonism of vecuronium paralysis: comparison between edrophonium and neostigmine.

The reversal of vecuronium paralysis was studied in three series of anesthetized (methohexital, fentanyl, N2O/O2) informed adult patients receiving either 40 micrograms/kg neostigmine (NEO40) (n = 6), either 500 micrograms/kg edrophonium (EDRO500) (n = 6) or 1000 micrograms/kg edrophonium (EDRO1000) (n = 6). These drugs were given randomly once the adductor pollicis twitch height regained 10% of its initial value. The neuromuscular transmission recovery was assessed during 15 minutes after the antagonist administration, by recording twitch height (TH), train of four--2 Hz--every 3 minutes (TOF Ratio) and finally tetanic fade--50 Herz (TET50) and 100 Hz (TET100), 5 seconds duration, one minute apart--. At 15 minutes, the TH values (mean +/- SEM) were for EDRO500 92% +/- 7, for EDRO1000 93% +/- 3 and for NEO40 100% +/- 4 percent (n.s.). For the TOF Ratio, a statistical difference (p less than 0.05) was found between NEO40 86% +/- 4 and the two other groups: EDRO500 73% +/- 3, EDRO1000 69% +/- 4. For the TET50, the values were: EDRO500 93% +/- 3, EDRO1000 86% +/- 5 and NEO40 94% +/- 2 (n.s.). At 100 Hz, the values were: NEO40 61% +/- 8, EDRO500 43 +/- 151 and EDRO1000 31 +/- 12 (p less than 0.01). In conclusion, in the conditions studied, 40 micrograms/kg neostigmine restores the neuromuscular transmission of the adductor pollicis at a higher level than edrophonium 500 micrograms/kg does. Edrophonium, 1000 micrograms/kg instead of 500 micrograms/kg does not change the neuromuscular transmission recovery.     

Time to peak effect of neostigmine at antagonism of atracurium- or vecuronium-induced neuromuscular block

Study Objective: (1) To determine the time to peak effect of neostigmine (time to peak antagonism) during atracurium- or vecuronium-induced neuromuscular block; and (2) to determine the effect on time to peak effect of neostigmine during atracurium-induced neuromuscular block, when the dose of neostigmine is increased from 35 μg/kg to 70 μg/kg.

Design: Prospective, randomized clinical study.

Setting: Gynecologic operating room suite at a university hospital.

Patients: 45 ASA I and II women admitted for gynecologic laparotomy.

Interventions: Anesthesia was performed with thiopental sodium, fentanyl, halothane, nitrous oxide, and atracurium or vecuronium. Train-of-four (TOF) stimulation and mechanomyography were used to monitor neuromuscular transmission. Neostigmine was administered while a constant degree of neuromuscular block was maintained at a twitch height at a point between 4% and 11% of the control twitch height, using a continuous infusion of atracurium or vecuronium. The patients were randomized to three groups, with 15 patients in each group. Group 1 received atracurium block antagonized with neostigmine 35 μg/kg; group 2 received vecuronium block antagonized with neostigmine 35 μg/kg; and group 3 received atracurium block antagonized with neostigmine 70 μg/kg.

Measurements and Main Results: The degree of neuromuscular block at antagonism was similar in the three groups. Time to peak effect (mean ± SD) on TOF ratio was significantly longer in Group 1 (9.7 ± 3.0 minutes) versus Group 2 (6.6 ± 1.4 minutes; (p < 0.05). The time to peak effect on TOF ratio during atracurium-induced block was reduced from 9.7 ± 3.0 minutes to 6.3 ± 2.0 minutes when the dose of neostigmine was increased from 35 μg/kg to 70 μg/kg (p < 0.05). The peak effect on TOF ratio was significantly greater in Group 3 compared with Group 1 (p < 0.05), while it was similar in groups 1 and 2.

Conclusion: The time to peak effect of neostigmine 35 μg/kg is about 6 to 10 minutes when antagonizing a constant degree of atracurium- or vecuronium-induced neuromuscular block at a twitch height at a point between 4% and 11%. Even though the time to peak effect was longer with atracurium than with vecuronium, clinically significant differences between the antagonizing effect of atracurium versus vecuronium block were not demonstrated. The time to peak effect during atracurium-induced block decreased when the dose of neostigmine was increased from 35 μg/kg to 70 μg/kg.     

Priming with anticholinesterases — the effect of different combinations of anticholinesterases and different priming intervals

This study was designed to investigate the effect of different combinations of neostigmine and edrophonium when administered in divided doses and the effect of different intervals (priming intervals) between the doses. Seventy-two patients divided into 12 groups (n = 6 in each) were included in the study. An initial dose of neostigmine 0.012 mg.kg-1 or edrophonium 0.2 mg.kg-1 was administered, followed at different priming intervals (1, 2 or 3 min) by either edrophonium 0.8 mg.kg-1 or neostigmine 0.048 mg.kg-1 for antagonism of atracurium-induced neuromuscular blockade. Reversal was attempted at 10 per cent spontaneous recovery of twitch height. Adequate reversal of neuromuscular block (train-of-four ratio of 0.75) was achieved in all patients. Significant (p less than 0.05) acceleration of the recovery index (time taken for the twitch height to recover from 25 to 75 per cent of control) and reversal time (time taken from the end of injection of the priming dose until TOF ratio value had reached 0.75) was obtained in groups which received edrophonium-edrophonium combination. Recovery indices and reversal times were found to be significantly shorter (p less than 0.05) with a 1 min priming interval. In two additional groups of patients premedicated and anaesthetized as the others equipotent mixtures of the antagonists were administered as a single bolus dose. Reversal times were significantly longer (p less than 0.05) when compared to those given the same amounts of the combination but in divided doses with a 1 min priming interval.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Dose-response relationships for edrophonium and neostigmine antagonism of atracurium and cisatracurium- induced neuromuscular block

PURPOSE: To study the dose-response relationships for neostigmine and edrophonium during antagonism of neuromuscular block induced by atracurium and cisatracurium. METHODS: One hundred and twenty eight, ASA group 1 or 2 adults were given either 0.5 mg x kg(-1) atracurium or 0.1 mg x kg(-1) cisatracurium during fentanyl-thiopental-nitrous oxide-isoflurane anesthesia. The neuromuscular block was measured by an acceleration-responsive transducer. Responses were defined in terms of percent depression in the first twitch (T1) and train-of-four (TOF) response. When spontaneous recovery of first twitch height reached 10% of its initial control value, edrophonium (0.1, 0.2, 0.4, or 1 mg x kg(-1)) or neostigmine (0.005, 0.01, 0.02, or 0.05 mg x kg(-1)) was administered by random allocation. Neuromuscular function in another sixteen subjects was allowed to recover spontaneously. RESULTS: At five minutes, unlike edrophonium, neostigmine was equally effective against atracurium and cisatracurium with respect to T1 recovery. The neostigmine T1-ED50 was 10.3 +/- 1.06 (SEM) microg x kg(-1) after atracurium and 11.2 +/- 1.06) microg x kg(-1) after cisatracurium. The edrophonium ED50 was 157 +/- 1.07 microg x kg(-1) with atracurium and 47.4 +/- 1.07 microg x kg(-1) with cisatracurium, giving a neostigmine:edrophonium potency ratios of 15.2 +/- 1.7 and 4.2 +/- 0.41 (P < 0.001) for atracurium and cisatracurium, respectively. At 10 min neostigmine was 13 +/- 1.4 times as potent as edrophonium for achieving 50% TOF recovery after atracurium paralysis. After cisatracurium the potency ratio was 11.8 +/- 1.3 (NS). CONCLUSIONS: Although there were differences at five minutes, neostigmine:edrophonium potency ratios at 10 min, were similar in both relaxants studied.     

Conditions to optimise the reversal action of neostigmine upon a vecuronium-induced neuromuscular block

Background: Since neostigmine was introduced for reversal of neuromuscular block, there has been controversy about the optimum dose for antagonizing neuromuscular block. The purpose of this study was to characterise recovery of neuromuscular transmission following a vecuronium-induced block 15 min after neostigmine administration using different stimulation patterns, and to determine the effects of different doses of neostigmine given at various pre-reversal twitch heights. Methods: Adductor pollicis (AP) mechanical activity in response to low (0.1 and 2 Hz) and high (50 and 100 Hz) frequency stimulation, was recorded 15 min after 20, 40 and 80 μg/kg neostigmine, given to reverse a vecuronium-induced block at 10, 25 and 50% pre-reversal twitch height (TH). Fifty four ASA class I and II anaesthetised (methohexital, fentanyl, N₂O/O₂) young adult patients were studied and randomly allocated into 9 groups of 6 patients each. Results: In contrast to twitch height (TH) and residual force after 50 Hz, 5 s tetanic stimulation (RF50_Hz), the greater sensitivity of train-of-four (TOF) ratio and residual force after 100 Hz, 5 s tetanic stimulation (RF100_Hz) points out the best reversal conditions (prereversal TH and the optimal neostigmine dose) (P<0.001, two-way analysis of variance). The highest reversal scores (about 0.9 TOF ratio and RF100_Hz) were obtained when 40 μg/ kg of neostigmine was given at 25 and 50% TH. A 0.9 TOF ratio was also observed when 40 μg/kg of neostigmine was given at 10% TH, but, under these conditions, RF100_Hz was only 0.6 (P<0.05, Duncan test). Conclusion: To optimise the reversal action of neostigmine in order to obtain the highest neuromuscular transmission recovery (0.9 TOF ratio and RF100_Hz) during a vecuronium-induced neuromuscular block, the 40 μg/kg dose has to be given at 25 to 50% recovery of TH.     

Train-of-Four recovery after pharmacologic antagonism of pancuronium-, pipecuronium-, and doxacurium-induced neuromuscular block in anaesthetized humans

Previous studies have suggested that the increased duration of action of long-acting neuromuscular relaxants may make their pharmacologic antagonism more difficult and, thus, increase the likelihood of residual block. This hypothesis was tested in healthy, adult humans who received a background of isoflurane/N₂O/fentanyl anaesthesia.
Study subjects were paralyzed with either pancuronium (N=8), pipecuronium (N=8), or the longer-acting relaxant, doxacurium (N=8). Neuromuscular function was monitored, and, using a blinded, randomized study design, the relaxants were titrated to identify the ED₉₅ dose in each patient. Thereafter, spontaneous recovery was observed until there was 25% ofbaseline response to the first supramaximal twitch (Tl) in a train-of-four (TOF). At this time, the block was antagonized with neostigmine 0.07 mg/kg and glycopyrrolate 0.014 mg/kg i.v., and recovery of TOF was recorded.
Spontaneous recovery to 25% of the baseline Tl response occurred at 52± 14 min (mean±SD) following administration of either pancuronium and pipecuronium, and 85 ±33 min following doxacurium ( P <0.05 for doxacurium versus pancuronium and pipecuronium). In doxacurium-rreated patients, reversal of block with neostigmine was less predictable and less complete than with the other two relaxants. For example, the ratio of the fourth to first twitch (T4/T1) of the TOF at 10 and 15 min after reversal was significantly less with doxacurium (59 ±14% and 61±16%, respectively) than with either pancuronium (75±6% and 75±10%) or pipecuronium (76±9% for both). At 30 min post-neostigmine, the incidence of residual block (i.e. T4/T1 <0.70) was: pancuronium 2 patients, pipecuronium 1 patient, and doxacurium 5 patients.
These studies support the hypothesis that incomplete reversal of neuromuscular block is more likely with longer-acting neuromuscular relaxants.     

Dose-response studies of atracurium, vecuronium and pancuronium in the elderly

Dose-response curves were constructed for atracurium, vecuronium and pancuronium in elderly subjects in order to assess potency of these relaxants. The results were compared to data previously obtained for adult subjects using the same method. A single-dose method of potency determination was used in both studies. The results indicate no significant difference in the potency of these relaxants between elderly and adult subjects; the ED95S were 249 and 226 micrograms/kg for atracurium, 43.1 and 39.6 micrograms/kg for vecuronium and 65.9 and 60 micrograms/kg for pancuronium respectively in the elderly and the adults.     

A comparison of the neuromuscular blocking effects and reversibility of cisatracurium and atracurium

The neuromuscular blocking effects and the reversibility of cisatracurium 0.1 or 0.15 mgkg⁻¹ were compared with those of atracurium 0.5 mgkg⁻¹ during anaesthesia with propofol, nitrous oxide and isoflurane. Neuromuscular block was monitored using train-of-four stimulation while recording the mechanomyographic response of the adductor pollicis muscle. The block was either allowed to recover spontaneously or was antagonised with neostigmine 50 μgkg⁻¹ at 10% or 25% recovery of the first twitch of the train-of-four. The median times to maximum block were 2.7, 2.2 and 1.5 min following cisatracurium 0.1 and 0.15 mgkg⁻¹ and atracurium 0.5 mgkg⁻¹, respectively. After cisatracurium 0.1 mgkg⁻¹ had been given, the median time to recovery of the train-of-four ratio to 0.8 ('adequate recovery') was 74 min during spontaneous recovery, 48 min after reversal with neostigmine when the first twitch of the train-of-four had returned to 10% of control and 50 min after reversal when the first twitch of the train-of-four had returned to 25% of control. These times for cisatracurium 0.15 mgkg⁻¹ and atracurium 0.5 mgkg⁻¹ were 90, 66 and 57 min and 75, 56 and 54 min, respectively. Administration of neostigmine significantly shortened the time to adequate recovery for both drugs but there were no significant differences in the case of either neuromuscular blocking drug between the groups of patients given neostigmine at 10 or 25% recovery of the first twitch of the train-of-four.     

Effects of neostigmine, edrophonium, 4-aminopyridine and their combinations

A study was carried out in the in-vitro rat phrenic nerve hemidiaphragm preparation to find a fast and strong working antagonist of non-depolarizing muscle relaxants. We studied neostigmine, edrophonium, 4-aminopyridine and their combinations from the cumulative concentration response curves of pancuronium. Neostigmine, edrophonium and 4-aminopyridine all antagonized the effect of pancuronium. Neostigmine and 4-aminopyridine did potentiate each other as did neostigmine and edrophonium. The combination of edrophonium and 4-aminopyridine showed less total effect than the addition of their individual effect. We conclude that the mechanisms of action of neostigmine and edrophonium are different.