Coexisting endometrial cancer in patients with a preoperative diagnosis of atypical endometrial hyperplasia

AIM: To investigate the possibility of coexisting endometrial cancer (EC) in patients with atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH). METHODS: Forty-six consecutive women who underwent hysterectomy for AEH were analyzed. RESULTS: Final histopathological evaluation of hysterectomy specimens revealed EC in 11 patients (23.9%). Preoperative diagnosis of AEH was established by pipelle biopsy in eight patients and curettage was performed in the remaining patients. Of the patients with pipelle biopsy, two had a diagnosis of EC (25%), whereas nine women who underwent curettage, were further diagnosed as having EC (23.7%) (P > 0.05). Four (13.3%) of 30 women who had frozen sections at hysterectomy, were diagnosed with EC. Diagnosis of EC was missed in two patients (50%) at frozen section. In contrast, seven of 16 women (43.7%) who did not have frozen section, had EC. CONCLUSION: A relatively high incidence of EC is seen in patients with a diagnosis of AEH. Diagnostic results of pipelle biopsy and curettage were comparable. Frozen sections of hysterectomy specimens does not guarantee to exclude the possibility of EC, especially in patients with no myometrial invasion.     

Concurrent endometrial carcinoma following hysterectomy for atypical endometrial hyperplasia

Objective

To evaluate the prevalence of concurrent endometrial carcinoma in women diagnosed with atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH) by endometrial biopsy.

Study design

We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 126 patients who underwent hysterectomies for AEH diagnosed by endometrial biopsy from 1999 to 2008. AEH was initially diagnosed by dilatation and curettage (98 cases) or endometrial biopsy with a Z-sampler (24 cases). The remaining four cases were diagnosed by hysteroscopic polypectomy. The results of the endometrial biopsies were graded on an ordinal scale and were compared with pathologic features obtained at the hysterectomy.

Results

In patients preoperatively diagnosed with AEH by biopsy, hysterectomy specimens revealed a rate of simple or complex endometrial hyperplasia without atypia of 27% with AEH and normal proliferative phases found in 54.7 and 7.9% of specimens, respectively. The incidence of endometrial carcinoma was considerably high (13/126, 10.3%). Eleven of 13 cases were confined to the endometrium and the remaining two were located at the adenomyosis without myometrial invasion. All patients with endometrial carcinoma displayed coexisting atypical complex hyperplasia following hysterectomy.

Conclusions

Biopsy specimens showing AEH, particularly atypical complex hyperplasia, are associated with a risk of coexisting endometrial carcinoma. When considering management strategies for women with a biopsy diagnosis of AEH, clinicians should take into account the considerable rate of concurrent endometrial cancer and the discrepancy with pathologic diagnosis. Treatment modalities may differ depending on population as the rates of concurrent endometrial cancer with AEH and myometrial invasion vary by geographical location.     

Which is the best technique for endometrial sampling? Aspiration (pipelle) versus dilatation and curettage (D&C)

Purpose

To compare diagnostic accuracy and adequacy of pipelle endometrial biopsy with dilatation and curettage.

Methods

From October 2007 to November 2009, 673 patients were evaluated with pipelle endometrium biopsy, D&C and hysterectomy in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Istanbul University Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty. 478 patients underwent pipelle and D&C, 212 patients underwent pipelle and hysterectomy and 161 patients underwent D&C and hysterectomy. Uterine findings were grouped under five headings: normal, hyperplasia, focal lesion, atypia, and atrophy. Histologic sections from pipelle biopsy or D&C specimens were compared with each other and hysterectomy specimens. Chi-square, Mc.Nemar, and Fisher-exact tests were used as appropriate. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated for each method used in the study.

Results

We compared the histological results of pipelle biopsy and D&C. Statistically outcomes of pipelle and D&C were concordant with each other. Concordance rate was 67?% between pipelle and hysterectomy and 70?% between D&C and hysterectomy. Sensitivity of pipelle biopsy in detection of hyperplasia and aytpia was 67 and 75?%, respectively. Sensitivity of D&C for detecting hyperplasia and atypia was 62 and 83?%. NPV of pipelle biopsy and D&C was 99?% for malignancy.

Conclusions

Pipelle biopsy and D&C showed almost equal success rate in the diagnosis of endometrial pathologies. Neither pipelle nor D&C is adequate method for focal endometrial pathologies. Both biopsy methods are not perfect, but pipelle biopsy is a cheaper and easy technique compared with D&C, and ultrasonographic findings of endometrium should be considered prior to endometrial biopsy.     

Accuracy of endometrial biopsy with the Cornier pipelle for diagnosis of endometrial cancer and atypical hyperplasia

OBJECTIVE: To establish the accuracy of endometrial biopsy with the Cornier pipelle in the diagnosis of endometrial cancer and atypical endometrial hyperplasia in our milieu. MATERIAL AND METHOD: We reviewed 1,535 anatomopathologic reports on endometrial biopsies taken from outpatients using the Cornier pipelle between 1997 and 2000, in pre- and postmenopausal patients with abnormal vaginal bleeding. In 168 patients (10.9%), curettage and/or hysterectomy was subsequently carried out. In these cases, the anatomopathologic reports were compared to determine sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and likelihood ratio (LR). RESULTS: Sensitivity was 84.2%, specificity was 99.1%, accuracy was 96.9%, PPV was 94.1%, NPV was 93.7% and LR was 93.5. In 249 cases (16.09%) the material was insufficient for study. CONCLUSION: We determined that endometrial biopsy taken with the Cornier pipelle is, as we practice it, an accurate method for diagnosis of endometrial cancer and its precursor, atypical hyperplasia.     

Atypical hyperplasia of endometrium and hysteroscopy

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the risk of discovering an endometrial cancer when atypical hyperplasia was diagnosed by either endometrial samples using the pipelle device or hysteroscopic resection products. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective monocentric study from january 1990 to july 2000. Twenty-three patients with atypical hyperplasia were included. Initial endometrial status was provided by endometrial biopsyduring diagnosis hysteroscopy (12 cases) or by operative hysteroscopic resection products (11 cases). For 23 patients, operative hysteroscopy and analyse of products resected were performed. For all patients, there was no hysteroscopical aspect evocative of adenocarcinoma. For 23 patients, histopathological analysis of the hysterectomy piece precised the final diagnosis. RESULTS: Among the 23 hysterectomy pieces, 7 adenocarcinomas were diagnosed (30.4%). Risk for discovering adenocarcinoma when atypical hyperplasia was diagnosed by means of the pipelle biopsy device was 50% (6/12). Risk for discovering adenocarcinoma when atypical hyperplasia was diagnosed by means of operative hysteroscopy resection products was 5.9 % (1/17). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Atypical endometrial hyperplasia evidenced by pipelle biopsy device is often associated with adenocarcinoma. Diagnosis hysteroscopy however does not show evident pathological aspect of adenocarcinoma in such cases. Operative hysteroscopy allows in most cases correction of endometrial status. Risk of omitting adenocarcinoma when atypical hyperplasia is discovered on hysteroscopic resection pieces is low.     

人附睾蛋白4在子宫内膜非典型增生患者中筛查子宫内膜癌的临床价值

目的：探讨人附睾蛋白4（human epididymis protein 4,HE4）检测在诊断性刮宫（诊刮）病理为子宫内膜非典型增生（atypical endometrial hyperplasia,AEH）患者中筛查子宫内膜癌（endometrial carcinoma,EC）的临床价值。方法：选取2011年1月—2014年12月在天津市中心妇产科医院诊刮病理为AEH进而行手术治疗的患者,术前采用电化学发光免疫分析法检测患者血清HE4、CA125和CA199水平,根据术后病理分为EC组和AEH组,分析2组患者肿瘤标记物的水平差异。制作受试者工作特征曲线（ROC）,以曲线下面积（AUC）反映肿瘤标记物的诊断价值。结果：入选的118例诊刮病理为AEH的患者中,31例术后被诊断为EC（EC组）,其血清HE4、CA125和CA199水平分别为73.4 pmol/L、31.4 kU/L和23.3 kU/L;87例术后诊断仍为AEH（AEH组）,上述3种肿瘤标记物的水平分别为44.3 pmol/L、17.0 kU/L和19.0 kU/L;EC组HE4和CA125水平高于AEH组,差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）,而CA199水平差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。EC组以AEH组为参照时,HE4和CA125单独检测的AUC分别为0.785和0.706,两者联合检测的AUC为0.867,敏感度为76.6%。结论：EC患者血清HE4和CA125水平明显高于AEH患者,两者联合检测有助于筛查出诊刮病理为AEH人群中漏诊的EC患者。     

子宫内膜非典型增生行全子宫切除术159例临床分析

目的：探讨子宫内膜非典型增生（AEH）患者的临床特点及行全子宫切除术后病理升级为子宫内膜癌（EC）的危险因素。方法：回顾性分析2015年1月—2018年12月159例因AEH于首都医科大学附属北京妇产医院妇科微创中心行全子宫切除术患者的临床资料,按照术后病理情况分为非EC组134例（84.3%）、EC组25例（15.7%）,分析其术后病理升级的高危因素。结果：与非EC组相比,EC组肥胖、绝经、异常子宫内膜血流信号及糖尿病的发生率差异具有统计学意义（均P＜0.05）。多因素Logistic回归分析结果显示,肥胖（OR=3.196,95%CI：1.147～8.902,P=0.026）及糖尿病（OR=3.866,95%CI：1.019～14.673,P=0.047）是AEH患者术后病理升级为EC的危险因素。结论：AEH患者并发EC的发生率较高,对于合并肥胖及糖尿病的患者更应引起重视,术前综合评估,制定个体化治疗方案。     

Resectoscopic surgery may be an alternative to hysterectomy in high-risk women with atypical endometrial hyperplasia

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Endometrial hyperplasia is found in 2% to 10% of women with abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB). Up to 43% of patients with cytologic atypia harbor coexisting adenocarcinoma, and approximately 20% to 52% of atypical hyperplasias, if untreated, progress to cancer. The objective of this study was to estimate the incidence of atypical endometrial hyperplasia encountered during routine resectoscopic surgery in women with AUB and to evaluate the role of resectoscopic surgery in the management of women with AUB and atypical endometrial hyperplasia who refused and/or were at high risk for hysterectomy. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II-3). SETTING: University-affiliated teaching hospital. PATIENTS: From January 1990 through December 2005, the senior author (GAV) performed primary resectoscopic surgery in 3401 women with AUB. Among these, there were 22 women with atypical (17 complex, 5 simple) endometrial hyperplasia. INTERVENTIONS: All women underwent hysteroscopic evaluation and partial (n = 3) or complete (n = 19) endometrial electrocoagulation and/or resection. Subsequently, 6 women had hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The median (range) for age, parity, and body mass index were 55 years (24-78 years), 2 (0-4), and 30.1 kg/m2 (22.5-52.2 kg/m2), respectively. Among the 3401 women, there were 22 cases of atypical endometrial hyperplasia, 12 of which were incidentally diagnosed at the time of hysteroscopy (complex 10, simple 2, incidence 0.35%). After hysteroscopic diagnosis or confirmation of diagnosis, 6 women underwent hysterectomy and BSO. Of the remaining 16 women, followed for a median of 5 years (range 1.5-12 years), 1 was lost to follow-up, 1 had only a biopsy to preserve fertility, 1 died from lung cancer after 4 years, and 1 died from colon cancer after 5 years. One patient developed endometrial cancer after 10.5 years with postmenopausal bleeding. She remains alive and well 3.5 years after hysterectomy and BSO. The remaining 11 patients are amenorrheic at a median follow-up of 6 years (range 1.5-12 years). CONCLUSIONS: Resectoscopic surgery in 3391 women with AUB detected 12 incidental cases of atypical endometrial hyperplasia (incidence 0.35%). Skillful resectoscopic surgery may be an alternative to hysterectomy in women with AUB and atypical endometrial hyperplasia, who refuse or are at high-risk for hysterectomy and who are compliant with regular and long-term follow-up.     

Which surgical procedure for patients with atypical endometrial hyperplasia?

OBJECTIVE: To determine the occult coexistence of endometrial carcinoma in patients with atypical endometrial hyperplasia and to compare histological prognostic factors according to lymph node status in occult endometrial carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred and four patients from two referral centers (during the period 1990-2003) who were operated on within 1 month of endometrial biopsy for symptomatic endometrial hyperplasia without receiving any medical treatment were included retrospectively. Patients having preoperative endometrial biopsy results of concomitant endometrial hyperplasia and carcinoma were excluded from the study. Fifty-six patients having atypia in preoperative biopsy (group I) were compared with 148 patients without atypia (group II). Chi-square and Mann-Whitney U-tests were used for statistical analyses. RESULTS: No significant difference was observed between the two groups according to age or menopausal status. Patients in group II had significantly higher parity than patients in group I. In group I, 62.5% of the patients had endometrial carcinoma, 21.4% had endometrial hyperplasia, and 16.1% had normal endometrium in hysterectomy specimens. In group II, the percentages were 5.4, 38.5, and 56.1%, respectively. Complete surgical staging was performed in 20 patients. Four patients had metastatic lymph nodes. All of them had grade 2 tumors with lymphovascular space involvement. Three of them had nonendometrioid tumors. CONCLUSION: Careful intraoperative and preoperative evaluation of the endometrium must be the sine qua non for patients with atypical endometrial hyperplasia. It is reasonable to do frozen section at the time of hysterectomy for atypical endometrial hyperplasia, and if grade 2/3 of nonendometrioid cancer with lymphovascular space involvement is found, complete surgical staging should be performed.     

Hysteroscopic view in atypical endometrial hyperplasias: A correlation with pathologic findings on hysterectomy specimens

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether hysteroscopic imaging can contribute to decrease the rate of undetected endometrial carcinomas concurrent with atypical hyperplasia diagnosed by endometrial biopsy. DESIGN: Retrospective study. DESIGN CLASSIFICATION: Canadian Task Force Classification II-3. SETTING: Public hospital. PATIENTS: Hysteroscopic reports of 25 menopausal patients undergoing endometrial biopsy yielding a diagnosis of atypical hyperplasia were reviewed. On the basis of this diagnosis, all patients were treated by hysterectomy, and the pathologic findings on the uterine specimen were correlated with the diagnoses obtained by hysteroscopic view. INTERVENTIONS: Hysteroscopy was video-assisted and carried out with normal saline solution used as liquid distension medium; a 5-mm sheathed hysteroscope, with a working channel, was used for each examination. After hysteroscopic inspection, an endometrial sampling targeted under vision was performed by mechanical or electrosurgical instrumentation. When extensive features of hyperplastic or neoplastic growth were observed, we combined a blind sampling procedure with Vabra-curettage. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, and negative and positive predictive values of hysteroscopic inspection to foresee the diagnosis of endometrial cancer incidentally detected on hysterectomy specimen. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: On the basis of histopathologic study of uterine specimens, non atypical hyperplasias were detected in 3 patients, the diagnosis of complex atypical hyperplasia was confirmed in 11 patients, whereas a concurrent infiltrating endometrial adenocarcinoma was detected in 11 patients (44.0%). In the 14 patients with diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia, no feature suggesting endometrial malignancy was reported by hysteroscopic inspection. In the 11 cases showing infiltrating carcinomas, hysteroscopic view was consistent with endometrial malignancy in 9 patients and with endometrial hyperplasia in 2 patients. An intramucous endometrial carcinoma without evidence of myometrial invasion was found on hysterectomy specimens of these two latter patients. From these figures, sensitivity, specificity, and negative and positive predictive values of hysteroscopy to foresee a diagnosis of infiltrating carcinoma were 84.6%, 100%, 87.5%, and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Hysteroscopic view is a sensitive and specific method to identify among patients with a diagnosis of atypical hyperplasia on endometrial biopsy those with a coexisting infiltrating carcinoma.     

Frozen section pathology at time of hysterectomy accurately predicts endometrial cancer in patients with preoperative diagnosis of atypical endometrial hyperplasia

Objectives

A significant number of women diagnosed with atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH) on endometrial biopsy will be diagnosed with endometrial cancer (EC) on the hysterectomy specimen at permanent section. Surgical treatment for AEH and EC differ substantially. We have assessed the concordance in EC between frozen and permanent sections on patients undergoing hysterectomy for AEH.

Materials and methods

A retrospective review of 66 frozen sections on patients undergoing hysterectomy for AEH was performed. Frozen and permanent section diagnoses were categorized as negative or positive for malignancy. Permanent section carcinomas were classified as low or high risk based on their histopathology, myometrial invasion and differentiation. Correlation between frozen and permanent section and sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy of frozen section in predicting EC in permanent section were calculated. Likelihood of diagnosing EC on frozen section was compared based on risk stratification at permanent section.

Results

Frozen and permanent sections revealed malignancy in 43.9% and 56% of the patients respectively. 94.1% of high risk carcinomas were identified as EC at frozen section as compared to 55% of low risk EC. Concordance was good (κ = 0.75). Sensitivity, specificity, NPV, PPV and accuracy in predicting EC at frozen section were 73%, 93.1%, 73% and 93.1% respectively. Carcinomas were detected at frozen section significantly more often if they were at high risk.

Conclusions

The substantial agreement between frozen and permanent sections allows minimizing under- and overtreatment of women undergoing hysterectomy for AEH. High risk EC are efficiently identified in frozen section.     

Transvaginal ultrasound measurement of endometrial thickness and endometrial pipelle sampling as an alternative diagnostic procedure to hysteroscopy and dilatation and curettage in the management of post-menopausal bleeding.

In order to evaluate pipelle endometrial sampling combined with ultrasound measurement of endometrial thickness as an initial diagnostic procedure in the assessment of endometrial pathology in patients presenting with postmenopausal bleeding, 50 consecutive patients were studied prospectively. In each patient measurement of endometrial thickness and pipelle endometrial biopsy were performed as an out-patient procedure before hysteroscopy and dilatation and curettage (D&C). The diagnostic sensitivity with pipelle endometrial sampling alone in detecting endometrial pathology was 25% with a specificity of 100%. The measurement of endometrial thickness had a sensitivity of 62% with a specificity of 87.8%. Pipelle sampling combined with endometrial thickness increased the sensitivity to 87.5% with a specificity of 87.8%. Therefore, we suggest that pipelle sampling combined with sonographic measurement of endometrial thickness is an acceptable, less invasive alternative to hysteroscopy and D&C as a first-line investigation in the management of post-menopausal bleeding.     

Clinical over- and under-estimation in patients who underwent hysterectomy for atypical endometrial hyperplasia diagnosed by endometrial biopsy: the predictive value of clinical parameters and diagnostic imaging

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical and imaging characteristics in patients diagnosed with atypical endometrial hyperplasia based on endometrial biopsy in comparison with the final diagnosis from resected uteri; i.e. to determine the rates of underestimation (endometrial cancer), equivalent diagnosis (atypical hyperplasia), and overestimation (hyperplasia without atypia or non-hyperplastic lesion). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed 33 patients who were diagnosed with atypical endometrial hyperplasia by endometrial biopsy using a small curette and then underwent total abdominal hysterectomy between September 1992 and May 2002. Clinical parameters obtained from patients' charts, and imaging analyses using transvaginal ultrasonography (TUS) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging were retrospectively re-examined. RESULTS: Among 33 patients who underwent hysterectomy due to a diagnosis of atypical hyperplasia, nine cases (27.2%) were underestimated (cancer), nine cases (27.2%) were equivalent and 15 cases (45.6%) were overestimated as indicated by examination of the endometrium of the resected uterus. There was no difference among these groups in either clinical parameters or diagnostic images obtained by TUS or MR. CONCLUSION: Diagnosis of atypical endometrial hyperplasia by endometrial biopsy often resulted in under- or over-estimation, as shown by examination after hysterectomy. As there is neither a reliable clinical parameter nor imaging feature to distinguish between these groups, hysterectomy is still the best treatment for these patients if they are willing to give up their fertility.     

Pipelle endometrial sampling in patients with known endometrial carcinoma

The purpose of this prospective clinical trial was to determine the reliability of the Pipelle endometrial biopsy instrument in recovering adequate tissue for confirmation of the diagnosis of endometrial cancer in patients with known endometrial carcinoma, and to compare endometrial histology of the sampling specimen with that of the subsequent hysterectomy specimen. Forty patients were enrolled in this study. All biopsies were performed in the office without anesthesia. The patients had a median age of 62 years (range 40-83). Discomfort was reported by the patient as mild, moderate, or severe; only two patients (5.0%) reported severe pain. There were no complications experienced with endometrial sampling. Thirty-nine of 40 specimens (97.5%) confirmed endometrial carcinoma; therefore, this study yielded a 97.5% sensitivity for the Pipelle endometrial sampling device. Comparing Pipelle and hysterectomy histology for individual patients, the histologic grade was the same in 29 (74.4%), while the Pipelle demonstrated a more advanced degree of differentiation in five (12.8%) and a lesser degree in five (12.8%). There was no residual tumor identified in one hysterectomy specimen (2.5%). Among the 12 patients who had a D&C for diagnostic purposes before referral, the Pipelle biopsy correlated with the D&C histology in ten of 12 (83.3%) and revealed a more advanced grade of tumor in one (8.3%) and a more differentiated grade in one (8.3%). In one patient, the D&C histology was adenocarcinoma grade 1, with the Pipelle demonstrating atypical hyperplasia and the hysterectomy specimen interpreted as endometrial adenocarcinoma in situ. This study demonstrates the Pipelle to be an accurate device for endometrial sampling in patients with endometrial carcinoma.     

Vaginal hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy for treatment of endometrial cancer in the elderly

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to analyze the outcome of vaginal and abdominal hysterectomy for treatment of endometrial cancer in elderly patients. METHODS: In a retrospective series of 171 patients with age > or =70 years and at stages I-III, we evaluated operative and hospitalization data, as well as morbidity, mortality, and long-term survival associated with vaginal and abdominal hysterectomy. A total of 128 patients were operated on with vaginal hysterectomy and 43 cases underwent abdominal hysterectomy. RESULTS: Medically compromised patients were significantly more frequent in the vaginal surgery group (P = 0.01). Overall, the 10-year disease-specific survival rates after vaginal and abdominal hysterectomy were 80% and 78%, respectively (P = n.s.). Limiting the analysis to stage I (130 patients), 10-year disease-specific survival was 83% in 95 women operated on by the vaginal route and 84% in 35 patients operated by the abdominal approach (P = n.s.). Patients in the vaginal surgery group had a significantly shorter operative time (P = 0.01), less blood loss (P < 0.05), and were discharged earlier (P < 0.05). Severe complications occurred in 5.4% of the vaginal and in 7.0% of the abdominal procedures. Perioperative mortality was zero after vaginal hysterectomy and 2.3% after abdominal hysterectomy, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Vaginal hysterectomy showed a high cure rate, shorter operative time, less blood loss, reduced morbidity, and no mortality and therefore may be considered the elective approach for treatment of elderly patients with endometrial cancer.     

The value of curettage in diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the value of diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia by curettage and to determine the results of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) immunostaining in differentiating endometrial carcinoma from endometrial hyperplasia. METHODS: According to Kurman's criteria, we treated 150 patients with endometrial hyperplasia detected by curettage and compared retrospectively the diagnosis by curettage with that by hysterectomy. PCNA expression was examined using immunohistochemostaining on 60 patients with complex atypical hyperplasia detected by curettage. RESULTS: Simple hyperplasia was found by curettage in 53 patients, complex hyperplasia in 11, simple atypical hyperplasia in 26, and complex atypical hyperplasia in 60. All patients were rediagnosed after hysterectomy. As a result, 65 were found to have simple hyperplasia, 7 complex hyperplasia, 15 simple atypical hyperplasia, 29 complex atypical hyperplasia, and 34 endometrial carcinoma. The accuracy of histological diagnosis by curettage was 76.7-92.0% and was dependent on different types of hyperplasia. Simple atypical hyperplasia and complex atypical hyperplasia were more likely to coexist with endometrial carcinoma than both simple hyperplasia and complex hyperplasia (chi2 = 26.3, P < 0.001), and complex atypical hyperplasia was more likely to coexist with endometrial carcinoma than simple atypical hyperplasia (chi2 = 9.78, P < 0.005). In complex atypical hyperplasia patients, coexistence with endometrial carcinoma was more common after menopause than before menopause (chi2 = 3.93, P < 0.05). In complex atypical hyperplasia patients, the expression of PCNA in cases associated with endometrial carcinoma was higher or stronger than in cases associated without endometrial carcinoma (chi2 = 7.68, P < 0.01, or U = 252.00, P < 0.01). Conclusions. Curettage tends to be more highly accurate in diagnosing simple hyperplasia than complex atypical hyperplasia, which is often found by hysterectomy to be associated with endometrial carcinoma. The expression of PCNA may be helpful in differentiating complex atypical hyperplasia from endometrial carcinoma.     

Preoperative Factors of Endometrial Carcinoma in Patients Undergoing Hysterectomy for Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia

ObjectiveTo identify clinicopathological preoperative factors associated with concurrent endometrial carcinoma in patients undergoing surgical management of atypical endometrial hyperplasia.MethodsThe records of all patients who underwent hysterectomy for preoperatively diagnosed atypical endometrial hyperplasia at a tertiary care hospital from April 2017 to April 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Clinicopathological characteristics of patients were extracted. Patients who did not undergo hysterectomy or who had evidence of simple hyperplasia or carcinoma on initial biopsy were excluded. Univariate analysis was performed. A multivariate regression model for progression to endometrial carcinoma was developed.ResultsA total of 126 patients were included. Of these patients, 19 (15.1%) had a final diagnosis of endometrial carcinoma, whereas 86 (68.2%) retained the diagnosis of atypical endometrial hyperplasia and 21 (16.7%) were found to have no residual atypical endometrial hyperplasia. The odds of a patient being diagnosed with endometrial carcinoma were 6.1 times higher (95% CI 1.32–27.68) if they had an endometrial stripe thickness >1.1 cm and 13.5 times higher (95% CI 3.56–51.1) if there was histological suspicion of carcinoma. The odds of a patient being diagnosed with endometrial carcinoma were significantly lower if the patient had an initial diagnosis of atypical endometrial hyperplasia in a polyp (OR 0.07; 95% CI 0.02–0.34).ConclusionOur results suggest that an endometrial stripe thickness >1.1 cm, a histological suspicion of carcinoma on preoperative pathology, and the absence of polyp involvement on initial diagnosis are the strongest predictors of endometrial carcinoma at the time of hysterectomy in patients with atypical endometrial hyperplasia.     

Faut-il conserver l’utérus lors de la cure de prolapsus ? Réflexions à partir des résultats anatomo-pathologiques

ObjectivesTo evaluate the rate of pre-cancerous and cancerous endometrial lesions in hysterectomy during vaginal reconstructive pelvic surgery.Patients and methodsIn this retrospective and continuous study, a vaginal procedure including reconstructive pelvic surgery with vaginal mesh, hysterectomy and adnexectomy was performed in 152 patients between April 2001 and January 2006. An ultrasonography evaluation was done before surgery. A histopathological analysis of uterus, ovaries and tubes was also performed.ResultsIn the analysis of 136 cases, precancerous and cancerous lesions have been diagnosed while ultrasonography or cervical smear were normal: 2 (1.4%) endocervical dysplasia, 1 (0.7%) cervical epidermoid carcinoma, 10 (7.35%) endometrial complex non-atypical hyperplasia, 7 (5.1%) endometrial atypical hyperplasia and 2 (1.4%) endometrioid endometrial carcinoma. There was not any cancerous lesions in tubes or ovaries. At 10 months, mesh exposure was low at 2.9% (four cases).Discussion and conclusionThe important rate of cancerous and precancerous lesions raise the question of hysterectomy or hysteroscopy and endometrial biopsy in case of uterine preservation during a vaginal reconstructive pelvic surgery.     

Detection of benign intracavitary lesions in postmenopausal women with abnormal uterine bleeding: a prospective comparative study on outpatient hysteroscopy and blind biopsy

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the specificity of blind biopsy in detecting benign intracavitary lesions as causes of postmenopausal bleeding in comparison with directed biopsy via hysteroscopy. DESIGN: Prospective trial without randomization (Canadian Task Force classification II-1). SETTING: University hospital. PATIENTS: Three hundred nineteen postmenopausal women with abnormal uterine bleeding. INTERVENTIONS: All patients underwent both blind biopsy (Novak's curette) and directed biopsy via hysteroscopy (after at least a week). All patients with benign intracavitary lesions underwent operative hysteroscopy to enable the removal of polyps and intracavitary myomas or endometrial resection if required. All patients with pathologic reports of complex hyperplasia and atypical hyperplasia (20 patients) underwent vaginal hysterectomy with bilateral adnexectomy. All patients with histology reports of endometrial carcinoma (15 patients) underwent abdominal hysterectomy, bilateral adnexectomy, and pelvic lymphadenectomy. Histopathologic findings from endometrial specimens obtained after operative hysteroscopy or uterine specimens obtained after hysterectomy were used as a reference test to establish the prevalence of disease. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values of blind biopsy and hysteroscopy were assessed to distinguish benign intracavitary formations such as polyps, submucous myomas, and endometrial hyperplasia in postmenopausal patients with abnormal uterine bleeding. The level of agreement was evaluated by use of the coefficient of concordance kappa. Blind biopsy showed a sensitivity of 11% and a specificity of 93%, with an accuracy of 59% in detecting endometrial polyps, a sensitivity and specificity of 13% and 100%, respectively, with an accuracy of 98% for submucous myomas, and values of 25%, 92%, and 80%, respectively, in diagnosing hyperplasia. On the other hand, hysteroscopy demonstrated a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 97%, with an accuracy of 91% in diagnosing endometrial polyps, a sensitivity and specificity of 100% and 98%, respectively, with an accuracy of 99% for submucous myomas. The coefficient of concordance kappa (95% CI) was 0.12 for blind biopsy and 0.82 for hysteroscopy, corresponding, respectively, to slight concordance and almost perfect agreement with final pathologic diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Blind biopsy (Novak's curette) demonstrates very low sensitivity and accuracy in the diagnosis of benign focal intracavitary lesions. Hysteroscopy is confirmed as the gold standard in the assessment of abnormal uterine bleeding in menopause, permitting the elimination of the false-negative results of blind biopsy through direct visualization of the uterine cavity and the performance of targeted biopsy in case of doubt.     

Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal vs. abdominal surgery in patients with endometrial cancer stage 1

BACKGROUND: The development of new diagnostic and surgical methods has brought a differentiated approach to the surgery of endometrial cancer. The aim of this study was to verify the peri- and postoperative differences between laparoscopic and open procedures. METHODS: In the period from January 1995 to August 2001 a total of 86 patients were treated for endometrial cancer stage 1. Of these, 28 patients were treated by laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO), while 58 patients were treated by total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) and BSO. The two patient groups were comparable in all aspects. RESULTS: The average hospital stay in the LAVH group was 2.7 days compared to 5.4 days for the TAH group. There were fewer complications in the LAVH group (7%) compared to the laparotomy group (14%). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy seems to be acceptable in the treatment of stage 1 endometrial carcinoma.