Cardiovascular outcome in treated hypertensive patients with responder, masked, false resistant, and true resistant hypertension

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the cardiovascular outcome in apparently responder hypertensive patients with responder and masked hypertension, and in apparently resistant hypertensive patients with false and true resistant hypertension. METHODS: The occurrence of fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events was evaluated in 340 patients with responder hypertension (clinic blood pressure [BP] <140/90 mm Hg and daytime BP <135/85 mm Hg), 126 with masked hypertension (clinic BP <140/90 mm Hg and daytime BP >135 or 85 mm Hg), 146 with false resistant hypertension (clinic BP >or=140 or 90 mm Hg and daytime BP <135/85 mm Hg), and 130 with true resistant hypertension (clinic BP >or=140 or 90 mm Hg and daytime BP >135 or 85 mm Hg). RESULTS: During follow-up period (4.98 +/- 2.9 years), the event-rate per 100 patient-years was 0.87, 2.42, 1.2, and 4.1 in patients with responder, masked, false resistant, and true resistant hypertension, respectively. After adjustment for several covariates, including clinic BP (forced into the model), Cox regression analysis showed that cardiovascular risk was significantly higher in masked hypertension (masked versus responder hypertension, relative risk [RR] 2.28, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-4.7, P < .05) and in true resistant hypertension (true resistant versus responder hypertension, RR 2.94, 95% CI 1.02-8.41, P < .05), whereas there was no significant difference between false resistant and responder hypertension. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that patients with masked hypertension are at higher risk than those with responder hypertension, and that those with false resistant hypertension are at lower risk than those with true resistant hypertension. Ambulatory BP monitoring should be performed in treated hypertensive patients to obtain a better prognostic stratification.     

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and risk of cardiovascular disease: a population based study

BACKGROUND: Information on the relationship between ambulatory blood pressure (BP) and cardiovascular disease in the general population is sparse. METHODS: Prospective study of a random sample of 1700 Danish men and women, aged 41 to 72 years, without major cardiovascular diseases. At baseline, ambulatory BP, office BP, and other risk factors were recorded. The end point was a combined end point consisting of cardiovascular mortality, ischemic heart disease, and stroke. RESULTS: After a mean follow-up of 9.5 years, 156 end points were recorded. In multivariate models, the relative risk (95% confidence interval) associated with increments of 10/5 mmHg of systolic/diastolic ambulatory BP were 1.35 (1.21-1.50) and 1.27 (1.16-1.39). The corresponding figures for office BP were 1.18 (1.09-1.29) and 1.11 (1.03-1.19). Compared with normotension (office BP <140/90 mm Hg; daytime BP <135/85 mm Hg) the relative risks associated with isolated office hypertension (office BP >/=140/90 mm Hg; daytime BP <135/85 mm Hg), isolated ambulatory hypertension (office BP <140/90 mm Hg; daytime BP >/=135/85 mm Hg), and sustained hypertension (office BP >/=140/90 mm Hg; daytime BP >/=135/85 mm Hg) were 0.66 (0.30-1.44), 1.52 (0.91-2.54), and 2.10 (1.45-3.06), respectively. A blunted BP decrease at night was a risk factor (P = .02) in subjects with daytime ambulatory hypertension, but not in subjects with daytime ambulatory normotension (P = .13). CONCLUSIONS: Ambulatory BP provided prognostic information about cardiovascular disease better than office BP. Isolated office hypertension was not a risk factor and isolated ambulatory hypertension tended to be associated with increased risk. A blunted BP decrease at night was a risk factor in subjects with daytime ambulatory hypertension.     

Prognosis of "masked" hypertension and "white-coat" hypertension detected by 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring 10-year follow-up from the Ohasama study

OBJECTIVES: We sought to investigate the prognosis in subjects with "white-coat" hypertension (WCHT) and "masked" hypertension (MHT), in which blood pressure (BP) is lower in clinical measurements than during ambulatory monitoring. BACKGROUND: The prognostic significance of WCHT remains controversial, and little is known about MHT. METHODS: We obtained 24-h ambulatory BP and "casual" BP (i.e., obtained in clinical scenarios) values from 1,332 subjects (872 women, 460 men) > or =40 years old in a representative sample of the general population of a Japanese community. Survival and stroke morbidity were then followed up for a mean duration of 10 years. RESULTS: Composite risk of cardiovascular mortality and stroke morbidity examined using a Cox proportional hazards regression model for subjects with WCHT (casual BP > or =140/90 mm Hg, daytime BP <135/85 mm Hg; relative hazards [RH])1.28; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.76 to 2.14) was no different from risk for subjects with sustained normal BP (casual BP <140/90 mm Hg, daytime BP <135/85 mm Hg). However, risk was significantly higher for subjects with MHT (casual BP <140/90 mm Hg, daytime BP > or =135/85 mm Hg; RH 2.13; 95% CI 1.38 to 3.29) or sustained hypertension (casual BP > or =140/90 mm Hg, daytime BP > or =135/85 mm Hg; RH 2.26; 95% CI 1.49 to 3.41) than for subjects with sustained normal BP. Similar findings were observed for cardiovascular mortality and stroke morbidity among subgroups by gender, use of antihypertensive medication, and risk factor level (all p for heterogeneity >0.2). CONCLUSIONS: Conventional BP measurements may not identify some individuals at high or low risk, but these people may be identifiable by the use of ambulatory BP.     

Evaluation of Criteria to Detect Masked Hypertension

The prevalence of masked hypertension (out‐of‐clinic daytime systolic/diastolic blood pressure (SBP/DBP) ≥135/85 mm Hg on ambulatory blood pressure monitoring [ABPM] among adults with clinic SBP/DBP <140/90 mm Hg) is high. It is unclear who should be screened for masked hypertension. The authors derived a clinic blood pressure (CBP) index to identify populations for masked hypertension screening. Index cut points corresponding to 75% to 99% sensitivity and prehypertension were evaluated as ABPM testing criterion. In a derivation cohort (n=695), the index was clinic SBP+1.3*clinic DBP. In an external validation cohort (n=675), the sensitivity for masked hypertension using an index ≥190 mm Hg and ≥217 mm Hg and prehypertension status was 98.5%, 71.5%, and 82.5%, respectively. Using National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data (n=11,778), the authors estimated that these thresholds would refer 118.6, 44.4, and 59.3 million US adults, respectively, to ABPM screening for masked hypertension. In conclusion, the CBP index provides a useful approach to identify candidates for masked hypertension screening using ABPM.     

Left ventricular changes in isolated office hypertension: a blood pressure-matched comparison with normotension and sustained hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Isolated office (IO) hypertension is a benign condition according to some researchers, whereas others believe it is associated with cardiovascular abnormalities and increased cardiovascular risk. The aim of this study is to compare morphofunctional characteristics of the left ventricle (LV) in IO hypertensive subjects, normotensive subjects (hereafter, hypertensives and normotensives), and never-treated sustained hypertensives. The 3 groups were matched not only by age, sex, and body mass index but also by clinic blood pressure (BP) (IO hypertensives and sustained hypertensives) and daytime BP (IO hypertensives and normotensives). METHODS: We enrolled 42 IO hypertensives (clinic BP > 140 and/or 90 mm Hg and daytime BP < or = 130/80 mm Hg), 42 sustained hypertensives (clinic BP > 140 and/or 90 mm Hg and daytime BP > or = 140 and/or 90 mm Hg) and 42 normotensives (clinic BP < 135 and/or 85 mm Hg and daytime BP < or = 130/80 mm Hg). Left ventricular morphologic features and function were assessed using digitized M-mode echocardiography. RESULTS: Compared with normotensives, IO hypertensives had significantly thicker LV walls, increased LV mass, reduced diastolic function, increased prevalence of LV hypertrophy, and preclinical diastolic dysfunction. Sustained hypertensives, compared with IO hypertensives, had significantly thicker LV wall, higher LV mass, and lower diastolic function, whereas the prevalence of LV hypertrophy and preclinical diastolic dysfunction was greater than in IO hypertensives, but the difference did not reach statistical significance (P = .29). CONCLUSIONS: Comparing matched BP groups, IO hypertensives have LV morphofunctional characteristics considerably different from normotensives and qualitatively similar to sustained hypertensives. Therefore, our results support the hypothesis that IO hypertension should not be considered as simply a benign condition.     

Significance of white-coat hypertension in older persons with isolated systolic hypertension: a meta-analysis using the International Database on Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring in Relation to Cardiovascular Outcomes population

The significance of white-coat hypertension in older persons with isolated systolic hypertension remains poorly understood. We analyzed subjects from the population-based 11-country International Database on Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring in Relation to Cardiovascular Outcomes database who had daytime ambulatory blood pressure (BP; ABP) and conventional BP (CBP) measurements. After excluding persons with diastolic hypertension by CBP (≥90 mm Hg) or by daytime ABP (≥85 mm Hg), a history of cardiovascular disease, and persons <18 years of age, the present analysis totaled 7295 persons, of whom 1593 had isolated systolic hypertension. During a median follow-up of 10.6 years, there was a total of 655 fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events. The analyses were stratified by treatment status. In untreated subjects, those with white-coat hypertension (CBP ≥140/<90 mm Hg and ABP <135/<85 mm Hg) and subjects with normal BP (CBP <140/<90 mm Hg and ABP <135/<85 mm Hg) were at similar risk (adjusted hazard rate: 1.17 [95% CI: 0.87-1.57]; P=0.29). Furthermore, in treated subjects with isolated systolic hypertension, the cardiovascular risk was similar in elevated conventional and normal daytime systolic BP as compared with those with normal conventional and normal daytime BPs (adjusted hazard rate: 1.10 [95% CI: 0.79-1.53]; P=0.57). However, both treated isolated systolic hypertension subjects with white-coat hypertension (adjusted hazard rate: 2.00; [95% CI: 1.43-2.79]; P<0.0001) and treated subjects with normal BP (adjusted hazard rate: 1.98 [95% CI: 1.49-2.62]; P<0.0001) were at higher risk as compared with untreated normotensive subjects. In conclusion, subjects with sustained hypertension who have their ABP normalized on antihypertensive therapy but with residual white-coat effect by CBP measurement have an entity that we have termed, "treated normalized hypertension." Therefore, one should be cautious in applying the term "white-coat hypertension" to persons receiving antihypertensive treatment.     

Masked hypertension in elderly managerial employees and retirees

Masked hypertension is reported to have the same level of hazard risk of cardiovascular mortality and stroke morbidity as sustained hypertension. The number of managerial employees suffering from cardiovascular disease and stroke is known to be greater than other employee. The aim of this study was to compare the 24-h blood pressure (BP) recordings between elderly male managerial employees and retirees and to propose a strategy for identifying masked hypertension. A total of 38 males (16 managerial employees aged 50-69 years and 22 retirees aged 60-65 years) who were not taking any antihypertensive medications participated in this study. Their 24-h BP was measured by an ambulatory BP monitoring device. Daytime (9:00-17:00 h) BPs of the employees (mean, 139/92 mm Hg) were significantly higher than in the retirees (mean 124/80 mm Hg), while there was no difference in BP before and during sleep. In all, 5 of 16 employees (31%) who were diagnosed as normotensive (<140/90 mm Hg) at a periodic health check had hypertension (>135/85 mm Hg) in the morning measured by ambulatory BP monitoring, while 6 (38%) had a similar level of hypertension during the daytime (9:00-17:00 h). These individuals were diagnosed as having masked hypertension. Multiple regression analyses showed that the job was the only factor that contributed to the difference in BP in the subjects during the daytime. This finding suggested that job stress seemed to be one of the main causes of masked hypertension. We argue that more frequent measurements of BP at the work place are necessary to identify subjects with masked hypertension.     

Prostasin: a possible candidate gene for human hypertension

BackgroundProstasin, a serine protease, is suggested to be a novel mechanism regulating the epithelial sodium channel (ENaC) expressed in the distal nephron. This study aimed to evaluate whether the human prostasin gene is a novel candidate gene underlying blood pressure (BP) elevation.MethodsIn a sample of healthy African-American (AA) and European-American (EA) twin subjects aged 17.6 +/- 3.3 years (n = 920, 45% AAs), race-specific tagging single-nucleotide polymorphisms (tSNPs) were identified to tag all the available SNPs +/- 2 kb up- and downstream of the prostasin gene from HapMap at r(2) of 0.8-1.0. Selection yielded four tSNPs in AAs and one in EAs, with one tSNP (rs12597511: C to T) present in both AAs and EAs.ResultsFor rs12597511, CT and TT genotypes exhibited higher systolic BP (SBP) than CC genotype (115.9 +/- 1.1 mm Hg vs. 113.7 +/- 0.6 mm Hg, P = 0.025 (AAs); and 110.7 +/- 0.5 mm Hg vs. 109.6 +/- 0.6 mm Hg, P = 0.115 (EAs)). CT and TT genotypes compared with CC genotype showed a significant increase in diastolic BP (DBP) in both racial groups (62.5 +/- 0.7 mm Hg vs. 60.4 +/- 0.4 mm Hg, P = 0.003 (AAs); and 58.2 +/- 0.3 mm Hg vs. 56.7 +/- 0.4 mm Hg, P = 0.007 (EAs)). Furthermore, there was an increase in radial pulse wave velocity (PWV) in subjects with CT and TT genotype as compared with those with CC genotype (6.5 +/- 0.1 vs. 6.1 +/- 0.1 m/s, P < 0.0001) (EAs); and 6.7 +/- 0.1 vs. 6.6 +/- 0.1 m/s, P = 0.354 (AAs)). Analyses combining AAs and EAs consistently demonstrated a statistical significance of rs12597511 on all the phenotypes including SBP/DBP and PWV.ConclusionGenetic variation of the prostasin gene may be implicated in the development of hypertension in youths.American Journal of Hypertension (2008). doi 10.1038/ajh.2008.224American Journal of Hypertension (2008); 21, 9, 1028-1033. doi 10.1038/ajh.2008.224.     

Masked Hypertension in Elderly Managerial Employees and Retirees

Masked hypertension is reported to have the same level of hazard risk of cardiovascular mortality and stroke morbidity as sustained hypertension. The number of managerial employees suffering from cardiovascular disease and stroke is known to be greater than other employee. The aim of this study was to compare the 24-h blood pressure (BP) recordings between elderly male managerial employees and retirees and to propose a strategy for identifying masked hypertension. A total of 38 males (16 managerial employees aged 50–69 years and 22 retirees aged 60–65 years) who were not taking any antihypertensive medications participated in this study. Their 24-h BP was measured by an ambulatory BP monitoring device. Daytime (9:00–17:00 h) BPs of the employees (mean, 139/92 mm Hg) were significantly higher than in the retirees (mean 124/80 mm Hg), while there was no difference in BP before and during sleep. In all, 5 of 16 employees (31%) who were diagnosed as normotensive (<140/90 mm Hg) at a periodic health check had hypertension (>135/85 mm Hg) in the morning measured by ambulatory BP monitoring, while 6 (38%) had a similar level of hypertension during the daytime (9:00–17:00h). These individuals were diagnosed as having masked hypertension. Multiple regression analyses showed that the job was the only factor that contributed to the difference in BP in the subjects during the daytime. This finding suggested that job stress seemed to be one of the main causes of masked hypertension. We argue that more frequent measurements of BP at the work place are necessary to identify subjects with masked hypertension.     

Menopause not aldosterone-to-renin ratio predicts blood pressure response to a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist in primary care hypertensive patients

BackgroundIt has been suggested that hypertensive patients with raised aldosterone-to-renin ratio (ARR) are specifically sensitive to mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs). We have previously shown that patients with an elevated ARR are relatively frequent in the setting of primary care. We therefore designed an interventional study to ascertain whether primary care hypertensive patients with an elevated ARR presented a superior response to MRA treatment than subjects with normal ratio.MethodsAccording to the previously observed distribution in general population, 1/3 and 2/3 of hypertensive patients with high or normal ARR, respectively, were treated with kanrenoate 50-100 mg/day for 2 months. To avoid uncontrolled blood pressure (BP), 49% of patients continued also "ARR-neutral" drugs such as verapamil and/or alpha-adrenergic blockers. Patients groups were matched for most features but an elevated ARR was more frequent in female than in male gender; moreover, 90% of women with raised ARR were in menopause.ResultsA clear reduction of BP values was recorded after both the first and the second month of treatment with kanrenoate, with the maximal effect obtained when the dosage titration at 100 mg/day was accomplished. However, patients previously identified by a raised ARR did not have a larger response to MRA treatment than patients with normal ratio. In contrast, MRA was twofold more effective in reducing SBP in women than in men (after 2 months of treatment -16.4 mm Hg vs.-8.2 mm Hg).ConclusionsThese results suggest that postmenopausal hypertension is largely dependent on mineralocorticoid receptor activation and selectively sensitive to MRAs.American Journal of Hypertension (2008). doi 10.1038/ajh.2008.234American Journal of Hypertension (2008); 21, 9, 976-982. doi 10.1038/ajh.2008.234.     

Effects of prehypertension and hypertension subtype on cardiovascular disease in the Asia-Pacific Region

The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Pressure defined blood pressure (BP) levels of 120 to 139/80 to 89 mm Hg as prehypertension and those of ≥ 140/90 mm Hg as hypertension. Hypertension can be divided into 3 categories, isolated diastolic (IDH; systolic BP <140 mm Hg and diastolic BP ≥ 90 mmHg), isolated systolic (systolic BP ≥ 140 mm Hg and diastolic BP <90 mmHg), and systolic-diastolic hypertension (systolic BP ≥ 140 mm Hg and diastolic BP ≥ 90 mmHg). Although there is clear evidence that isolated systolic hypertension and systolic-diastolic hypertension increase the risks of future vascular events, there remains uncertainty about the effects of IDH. The objective was to determine the effects of prehypertension and hypertension subtypes (IDH, isolated systolic hypertension, and systolic-diastolic hypertension) on the risks of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in the Asia-Pacific Region. The Asia Pacific Cohort Studies Collaboration is an individual participant data overview of cohort studies in the region. This analysis included a total of 346570 participants from 36 cohort studies. Outcomes were fatal and nonfatal CVD. The relationship between BP categories and CVD was explored using a Cox proportional hazards model adjusted for age, cholesterol, and smoking and stratified by sex and study. Compared with normal BP (<120/80 mmHg), hazard ratios (95% CIs) for CVD were 1.41 (1.31-1.53) for prehypertension, 1.81 (1.61-2.04) for IDH, 2.18 (2.00-2.37) for isolated systolic hypertension, and 3.42 (3.17-3.70) for systolic-diastolic hypertension. Separately significant effects of prehypertension and hypertension subtypes were also observed for coronary heart disease, ischemic stroke, and hemorrhagic stroke. In the Asia-Pacific region, prehypertension and all hypertension subtypes, including IDH, thus clearly predicted increased risks of CVD.     

Masked hypertension and target organ damage in treated hypertensive patients

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have shown that an elevated ambulatory or home blood pressure (BP) in the absence of office BP-a phenomenon called masked hypertension-is associated with poor cardiovascular prognosis. However, it remains to be elucidated how masked hypertension modifies target organ damage in treated hypertensive patients. METHODS: A total of 332 outpatients with chronically treated essential hypertension were enrolled in the present study. Patients were classified into four groups according to office (<140/90 or >or=140/90 mm Hg) and daytime ambulatory (<135/85 or >or=135/85 mm Hg) BP levels; ie, controlled hypertension (low office and ambulatory BP), white-coat hypertension (high office but low ambulatory BP), masked hypertension (low office but high ambulatory BP), and sustained hypertension (high office and ambulatory BP). Left ventricular mass index, carotid maximal intima-media thickness, and urinary albumin levels were determined in all subjects. RESULTS: Of the patients, 51 (15%), 65 (20%), 74 (22%), and 142 (43%) were identified as having controlled hypertension, white-coat hypertension, masked hypertension, and sustained hypertension, respectively. Left ventricular mass index, maximal intima-media thickness, and urinary albumin level in masked hypertension were significantly higher than in controlled hypertension and white-coat hypertension, and were similar to those in sustained hypertension. Multivariate regression analyses revealed that the presence of masked hypertension was one of the independent determinants of left ventricular hypertrophy, carotid atherosclerosis, and albuminuria. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that masked hypertension is associated with advanced target organ damage in treated hypertensive patients, comparable to that in cases of sustained hypertension.     

Can validated wrist devices with position sensors replace arm devices for self-home blood pressure monitoring? A randomized crossover trial using ambulatory monitoring as reference

BACKGROUND: Electronic devices that measure blood pressure (BP) at the arm level are regarded as more accurate than wrist devices and are preferred for home BP (HBP) monitoring. Recently, wrist devices with position sensors have been successfully validated using established protocols. This study assessed whether HBP values measured with validated wrist devices are sufficiently reliable to be used for making patient-related decisions in clinical practice. METHODS: This randomized crossover study compared HBP measurements taken using validated wrist devices (wrist-HBP, Omron R7 with position sensor) with those taken using arm devices (arm-HBP, Omron 705IT), and also with measurements of awake ambulatory BP (ABP, SpaceLabs), in 79 subjects (36 men and 43 women) with hypertension. The mean age of the study population was 56.7 +/- 11.8 years, and 33 of the subjects were not under treatment for hypertension. RESULTS: The average arm-HBP was higher than the average wrist-HBP (mean difference, systolic 5.2 +/- 9.1 mm Hg, P < 0.001, and diastolic 2.2 +/- 6.7, P < 0.01). Twenty-seven subjects (34%) had a > or =10 mm Hg difference between systolic wrist-HBP and arm-HBP and twelve subjects (15%) showed similar levels of disparity in diastolic HBP readings. Strong correlations were found between arm-HBP and wrist-HBP (r 0.74/0.74, systolic/diastolic, P < 0.0001). However, ABP was more strongly correlated with arm-HBP (r 0.73/0.76) than with wrist-HBP (0.55/0.69). The wrist-arm HBP difference was associated with systolic ABP (r 0.34) and pulse pressure (r 0.29), but not with diastolic ABP, sex, age, arm circumference, and wrist circumference. CONCLUSIONS: There might be important differences in HBP measured using validated wrist devices with position sensor vs. arm devices, and these could impact decisions relating to the patient in clinical practice.Measurements taken using arm devices are more closely related to ABP values than those recorded by wrist devices. More research is needed before recommending the widespread use of wrist monitors in clinical practice.American Journal of Hypertension doi:10.1038/ajh.2008.176American Journal of Hypertension (2008); 21, 7, 753-758. doi:10.1038/ajh.2008.176.     

Nighttime blood pressure dipping in postmenopausal women with coronary heart disease

BackgroundBlunted nighttime blood pressure (BP) dipping is prognostic of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. This relationship may be stronger among women than men. The present study hypothesized that coronary artery disease (CAD) and advancing age would be associated with reduced BP dipping in postmenopausal women. The effects of daytime physical activity and nighttime sleep quality on BP dipping were also examined.Methods54 postmenopausal women with CAD (≥50% occlusion of at least one major coronary vessel) and 48 age-matched (range 50-80 years) postmenopausal women without CAD (non-CAD) underwent 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring and actigraphic evaluations of daytime physical activity and nighttime sleep efficiency.ResultsWomen with CAD evidenced higher nighttime systolic BP (SBP) (P = 0.05) and blunted SBP dipping (P = 0.017), blunted diastolic BP (DBP) dipping (P = 0.047), and blunted pulse pressure dipping (P = 0.01), compared to non-CAD women. Multivariable regression models showed that the presence of CAD, age, daytime physical activity, and nighttime sleep efficiency were independently related to the magnitude of SBP dipping, together accounting for 25% of its variability. DBP dipping showed similar associations.ConclusionsFor postmenopausal women, the presence of CAD and advancing age are accompanied by blunted nighttime BP dipping, which may increase the risk of adverse cardiovascular events. Lifestyle changes that increase daytime physical activity and improve nighttime sleep quality may help improve cardiovascular risk by enhancing nighttime BP dipping.American Journal of Hypertension 2012; doi:10.1038/ajh.2012.95.     

Cardiovascular risk in patients receiving double therapy with false and true nonresponder hypertension

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate cardiovascular risk in hypertensive patients receiving double therapy with false and true nonresponder hypertension. METHODS: The occurrence of fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events was evaluated in 730 patients receiving double therapy with uncontrolled clinic blood pressure. Two hundred and seventy had false nonresponder hypertension (clinic blood pressure > or =140 or 90 mmHg and daytime blood pressure <135/85 mmHg) and 460 had true nonresponder hypertension (clinic blood pressure > or =140 or 90 mmHg and daytime blood pressure > or =135 or 85 mmHg). RESULTS: During the follow-up (4.77+/-2.9 years, range 0.2-11.7 years), 55 cardiovascular events occurred. The event rates per 100 patient-years in patients with false and true nonresponder hypertension were 1.03 and 1.9, respectively. Event-free survival was significantly different between the groups (P<0.05). After adjustment for several covariates, including clinic blood pressure (forced into the model), Cox regression analysis showed that cardiovascular risk was significantly higher in true than in false nonresponder hypertension (relative risk 2.33, 95% confidence interval 1.14-4.77, P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that, among treated hypertensive patients receiving double therapy with uncontrolled clinic blood pressure those with true nonresponder hypertension are at higher cardiovascular risk. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring should be performed in this population to achieve a better prognostic stratification.     

True Resistant Hypertension Following Observed Drug Ingestion: A Systematic Evaluation

The authors investigated the role of poor drug adherence in treatment‐resistant hypertension following observed drug ingestion in 102 patients. Median blood pressures (BPs) were 170/91 mm Hg at referral, 153/84 mm Hg prior to, and 142/79 mm Hg during a 4‐ to 6‐hour period after drug ingestion. Median daytime ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) over the following 24 hours was 142/80 mm Hg. Median BP at a final follow‐up clinic visit was 147/79 mm Hg. The cumulative number of patients achieving a goal of <140/90 mm Hg in clinic or <135/85 mm Hg mean on ABPM was 57 (56%), with a further nine (9%) controlled at the final follow‐up clinic visit. Thus, 65% of patients achieved a systolic BP <140 mm Hg at any point immediately prior to, or after, drug ingestion; the residual 35% were considered to have true resistant hypertension. In conclusion, among patients with suspected resistant hypertension, a minority were truly treatment‐resistant following observed drug ingestion and BP monitoring.     

Adrenalectomy improves arterial stiffness in primary aldosteronism

BackgroundAldosterone has been shown to substantially contribute to the accumulation of different types of collagen fibers and growth factors in the arterial wall, which increase wall stiffness. We previously showed that arterial wall stiffness is increased in primary aldosteronism (PA) independently of concomitant hypertension. This study was aimed at assessing the effects of specific treatment of PA on the arterial stiffness.MethodsTwenty-nine patients with confirmed PA (15 with aldosterone-producing adenoma treated by unilateral laparoscopic adrenalectomy, 14 treated with spironolactone (mainly idiopathic aldosteronism) were investigated by Sphygmocor applanation tonometer (using measurement of carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV) and augmentation index (AI)) at the time of the diagnosis and then approximately 1 year after the specific treatment.ResultsThe office blood pressure (BP) decreased from 167 +/- 18/96 +/- 9 to 136 +/- 12/80 +/- 7 mm Hg after adrenalectomy (P = 0.001), and from 165 +/- 21/91 +/- 13 to 151 +/- 22/88 +/- 8 mm Hg (not significant (n.s.)) on spironolactone. The mean 24-h BP decreased from 150 +/- 18/93 +/- 11 mm Hg to 126 +/- 17/80 +/- 10 mm Hg after adrenalectomy (P < 0.01), and from 155 +/- 16/94 +/- 12 to 139 +/- 18/88 +/- 8 mm Hg (n.s.) on spironolactone. The PWV significantly decreased after surgery from 9.5 +/- 2.7 m/s to 7.6 +/- 2 m/s (P = 0.001), and the AI (recalculated for heart rate 75/min) decreased significantly from 27 +/- 10 to 19 +/- 9% (P < 0.01). On the other hand, we did not find significant change of arterial stiffness indices in patients treated with spironolactone (PWV: 9.3 +/- 1.6 m/s vs. 8.8 +/- 1.3 m/s (n.s.); AI: 25 +/- 9% vs. 25 +/- 8% (n.s.)).ConclusionsSurgical but not conservative treatment of PA led to a significant decrease of BP and arterial stiffness parameters.American Journal of Hypertension (2008). doi:10.1038/ajh.2008.243American Journal of Hypertension (2008); 21, 10, 1086-1092. doi 10.1038/ajh.2008.243.     

Masked Hypertension Assessed by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Versus Home Blood Pressure Monitoring: Is It the Same Phenomenon?

BACKGROUND: Masked hypertension is defined as normal clinic blood pressure (CBP) and elevated out-of-clinic blood pressure assessed using either self-monitoring of blood pressure (BP) by the patients at home (HBP) or ambulatory BP (ABP) monitoring. This study investigated the level of agreement between ABP and HBP in the diagnosis of masked hypertension. METHODS: Participants referred to an outpatient hypertension clinic had measurements of CBP (two visits), HBP (4 days), and ABP (24 h). The diagnosis of masked hypertension based on HBP (CBP <140/90 mm Hg and HBP > or =135/85) versus ABP (CBP <140/90 and awake ABP > or =135/85) was compared. RESULTS: A total of 438 subjects were included (mean age +/- SD, 51.5 +/- 11.6 years; 59% men and 41% women, 34% treated and 66% untreated). Similar proportions of subjects with masked hypertension were diagnosed by ABP (14.2%) and HBP (11.9%). In both treated and untreated subjects, the masked hypertension phenomenon was as common as the white coat phenomenon. Among 132 subjects with normal CBP, there was disagreement in the diagnosis of masked hypertension between the HBP and the ABP method in 23% of subjects for systolic and 30% for diastolic BP (kappa 0.56). When a 5-mm Hg gray zone for uncertain diagnosis was applied to the diagnostic threshold, the disagreement was reduced to 9% and 6% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Similar proportions of subjects with masked hypertension are detected by ABP and HBP monitoring. Although disagreement in the diagnosis between the two methods is not uncommon, in the majority of these cases the deviation of the diagnostic BP above the threshold in not clinically important. Both ABP and HBP monitoring appear to be appropriate methods for the detection of masked hypertension.     

Current status and characteristics of hypertension treatment by primary physicians in Korea: data from Korean epidemiology study on hypertension (KEY study)

BackgroundThis study was designed to investigate the characteristics, control rate, and factors affecting BP control in hypertensive patients treated by primary physicians in Korea.MethodsThe study was a multicenter, nationwide, cross-sectional, population-based survey conducted to identify the current status of hypertension treatment in Korean patients. A direct mail survey was sent to a random sample of 800 primary-care clinics across the nation. A total of 529 physicians in 510 clinics agreed to participate in this study (63.8%). Among the recruited 13,452 patients, 13,184 were included in the analysis.ResultsBP was controlled in 6,723 patients (51.0%). However, the control rate was lower in patients with diabetes (21.6%) or chronic kidney disease (CKD) (19.9%). Furthermore, the mean systolic and diastolic BP levels were higher in patients with diabetes and/or CKD. The mean BP level was higher in patients undergoing combination therapy than those undergoing single-drug therapy. Male gender, cardiovascular comorbidities, long duration of hypertension, and unhealthy lifestyle were associated with poor control of hypertension. In multivariate analysis, diabetes (odds ratio: 5.57; 95% confidence interval: 5.05-6.13) and CKD (odds ratio: 3.40; 95% confidence interval: 2.54-4.54) were the most significant independent factors related to poor BP control.ConclusionBP control is still largely unsatisfactory, especially in patients with diabetes and kidney disease, who could benefit the most from effective BP control. The reasons for poor BP control and high BP levels in those patients need to be investigated to improve BP control in Korea.American Journal of Hypertension (2008). doi:10.1038/ajh.2008.191American Journal of Hypertension (2008); 21, 8, 884-889. doi:10.1038/ajh.2008.191.     

White-coat hypertension as a risk factor for the development of home hypertension: the Ohasama study

BACKGROUND: White-coat hypertension is a condition characterized by elevated blood pressure (BP) in medical settings combined with normal ambulatory-recorded BP or self-measured BP at home (home BP). However, it is unknown whether this condition represents a transient state in the development of hypertension outside medical settings. METHODS: We followed up 128 subjects with white-coat hypertension (home BP <135/85 mm Hg and office BP > or = 140/90 mm Hg) for 8 years and compared the risk of progression with home hypertension (home BP > or = 135/85 mm Hg or start of treatment with antihypertensive medication) with 649 sustained normotensive subjects (home BP <135/85 mm Hg and office BP <140/90 mm Hg) using data from population-based home BP measurement projects in Japan. RESULTS: During the 8-year follow-up period, 60 subjects (46.9%) with white-coat hypertension and 144 (22.2%) with sustained normotension progressed to home hypertension. The odds ratio of subjects with white-coat hypertension for progression to home hypertension (adjusted for possible confounding factors) was significantly higher than for subjects with sustained normotension (odds ratio, 2.86; P<.001). This association was observed independent of baseline home BP levels. CONCLUSION: The results from the present 8-year follow-up study demonstrate that white-coat hypertension is a transitional condition to hypertension outside medical settings, suggesting that white-coat hypertension may carry a poor cardiovascular prognosis.