Telithromycin in the treatment of pneumococcal community-acquired respiratory tract infections: a review.

OBJECTIVES: A pooled analysis of 14 Phase III studies was performed to establish the clinical and bacteriologic efficacy of telithromycin 800 mg once daily in the treatment of pneumococcal community-acquired respiratory tract infections (RTIs). METHODS: Data were examined from 5534 adult/adolescent patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB), or acute bacterial sinusitis, who had received telithromycin for 5-10 days or a comparator antibacterial. RESULTS: Streptococcus pneumoniae was identified in 704/2060 (34.2%) bacteriologically evaluable patients. The respective per-protocol clinical cure rates for telithromycin and comparators were 94.3% and 90.0% (CAP); 81.5% and 78.9% (AECB); 90.1% and 87.5% (acute sinusitis); 92.7% and 87.6% (all indications). Clinical cure rates were 28/34 (82.4%) and 5/7, respectively, for penicillin-resistant infections, and 44/52 (84.6%) and 11/14, respectively, for erythromycin-resistant infections. Of 82 patients with pneumococcal bacteremia, 74 (90.2%) were clinically cured after telithromycin treatment, including 5/7 and 8/10 with penicillin- or erythromycin-resistant strains, respectively. Adverse events considered possibly related to study medication were reported by 1071/4045 (26.5%) telithromycin and 505/1715 (29.4%) comparator recipients. These events were generally of mild/moderate severity, and mainly gastrointestinal in nature. CONCLUSIONS: As S. pneumoniae is the leading bacterial cause of community-acquired RTIs, and antibacterial resistance is increasing among this species, these findings support the use of telithromycin as first-line therapy in this setting.     

Telithromycin in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia: a pooled analysis

The efficacy of telithromycin has been assessed in six Phase III studies involving adults with mild to moderate community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) with a degree of severity compatible with oral therapy. Patients received telithromycin 800 mg once daily for 7-10 days in three open-label studies (n=870) and three randomized, double-blind, comparator-controlled studies (n=503). Comparator antibacterials were amoxicillin 1000 mg three-times daily, clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily and trovafloxacin 200 mg once daily. Clinical and bacteriological outcomes were assessed 7-14 days post-therapy. Among telithromycin-treated patients, per-protocol clinical cure rates were 93.1 and 91.0% for the open-label and comparative studies, respectively. Telithromycin treatment was as effective as the comparator agents. High eradication and clinical cure rates were observed for infections caused by key pathogens: Streptococcus pneumoniae including isolates resistant to penicillin G and/or erythromycin A (95.4%), Haemophilus influenzae (89.5%) and Moraxella catarrhalis (90%). Telithromycin was also highly effective in patients with infections caused by atypical and/or intracellular pathogens and those at increased risk of morbidity. Telithromycin was generally well tolerated. Telithromycin 800 mg once daily for 7-10 days offers a convenient and well-tolerated first-line oral therapy for the empirical treatment of mild to moderate CAP.     

Efficacy and Tolerability of Once-Daily Telithromycin Compared with High-Dose Amoxicillin for Treatment of Community-Acquired Pneumonia

Background: This randomized, double-blind study compared the efficacy and tolerability of the new ketolide antimicrobial telithromycin with that of high-dose amoxicillin in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Patients and Methods: Adult patients (n = 404), with signs and symptoms of CAP and radiologic confirmation were randomized to receive telithromycin 800 mg once daily (n = 199) or amoxicillin 1,000 mg three times a day (n = 205) for 10 days. Clinical and bacteriologic outcomes were assessed at post-therapy test-of-cure (days 17–24) and late post therapy (days 31–36). Results: The clinical cure rate for telithromycin-treated patients (per protocol) pst therapy (days 17–24) was 141/149 (94.6%) and compared well with that for amoxicillin (137/152 (90.1%)). Subset analysis of patients (per protocol) showed high clinical cure rates for patients aged ≥ 65 years (telithromycin 21/24, 87.5%; amoxicillin 22/29, 75.9%); those with documented pneumococcal bacteremia (telithromycin 10/10, 100%; amoxicillin 7/9, 77.8%); and patients with a Fine score ≥ III (telithromycin 31/34, 91.2%; amoxicillin 38/47, 80.9%). Bacterial eradication rates were comparable between treatments (telithromycin 42/48, 87.5%; amoxicillin 39/45, 86.7%), with 22/23 vs 18/21 Streptococcus pneumoniae strains 9/12 vs 11/13 Haemophilus influenzae strains and all Moraxella catarrhalis isolates (five and three patients, respectively) eradicated at the test-of-cure ivsit. Both treatments were generally well tolerated. Conclusion: Telithromycin 800 mg once daily is a convenient, optimal-spectrum, first-line treatment for CAP in adults, at least as effective and well tolerated as high-dose amoxicillin. Received: August 24, 2001 · Revision accepted: July 5, 2002 L. Hagberg (corresponding author)     

A Pooled Analysis of Telithromycin in the Treatment of Community-Acquired Respiratory Tract Infections in Adults

Abstract. Background: Thirteen multinational, Phase III studies were conducted to establish the efficacy of telithromycin 800 mg once daily in the treatment of community-acquired respiratory tract infections (RTIs). Patients and Methods: Data were analyzed from 4,743 adult patients participating across four indications: community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) of mild to moderate severity, acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB), acute maxillary sinusitis (AMS) and tonsillitis/pharyngitis. Results: Treatment with telithromycin for either 5 days (AECB, AMS and tonsillitis/pharyngitis) or 7–10 days (CAP and AMS) provided high rates of clinical and bacteriologic cure (5-day, 87.0% and 86.0%, respectively; 7 to 10-days, 90.3% and 90.5%, respectively) that were equivalent to those of a 10-day course of comparator antibacterials (86.5% and 86.5%, respectively). The clinical efficacy of telithromycin extended to high-risk CAP and AECB patients and to all key respiratory pathogens, including Streptococcus pneumoniae strains resistant to penicillin or erythromycin and atypical/intracellular pathogens. Telithromycin was generally well-tolerated across patient groups. Conclusion: These findings support the use of telithromycin as an effective therapy for the treatment of community-acquired RTIs.     

Clinical and bacteriological efficacy of 5-day telithromycin in acute maxillary sinusitis: a pooled analysis

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of a 5-day course of telithromycin (800 mg once daily) with a 10-day course of telithromycin or standard comparators (amoxicillin-clavulanate 500/125 mg three times daily or cefuroxime axetil 250 mg twice daily) in patients with acute maxillary sinusitis (AMS). METHODS: Data from three randomised double blind studies were pooled. The studies included patients with clinical symptoms of AMS and sinus X-ray findings of total opacity, air-fluid levels or mucosal thickening. RESULTS: Pooled analysis of results for 5-day telithromycin revealed overall clinical cure rates of 83.6% (383/458 patients) at post-therapy (days 17-24) and 78.9% (330/418 patients) at late post-therapy (days 31-45) in the per-protocol population. Clinical cure rates at post-therapy were equivalent to those observed with 10-day telithromycin (82.5% vs 81.7%) or comparator treatment (80.9% vs 77.4%). Moreover, clinical cure rates exceeded 80% in subgroups of patients of interest, including those with severe infection and those fulfilling more stringent criteria for bacterial AMS. A satisfactory bacteriological outcome was achieved in 87.6% of patients. The 5-day telithromycin regimen was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Telithromycin once daily for 5 days offers effective treatment for AMS and is comparable to 10-day courses of standard treatments.     

Efficacy of short-course therapy with the ketolide telithromycin compared with 10 days of penicillin V for the treatment of pharyngitis/tonsillitis

This randomized, double-blind study compared the efficacy and safety of a 5-d course of the new ketolide antimicrobial, telithromycin, with those of a standard 10-d course of penicillin V (phenoxymethylpenicillin) in patients with group A beta-hemolytic streptococci (GABHS) pharyngitis/tonsillitis. Patients aged 15-65 y (n = 395) with clinical signs and symptoms of pharyngitis/tonsillitis and a positive streptococcal antigen test or throat culture for GABHS were randomized to receive either telithromycin 800 mg once daily for 5 d (n = 198) or penicillin V 500 mg three times daily for 10 d (n = 197). Clinical and bacteriologic outcomes were assessed at post-therapy, test-of-cure (Days 16-20) and late post-therapy (Days 38-45) visits. Telithromycin for 5 d was equivalent to 10 d of penicillin V in terms of bacteriologic and clinical outcome (per-protocol): at post-therapy, test-of-cure visit, bacteriologic outcome was satisfactory in 84.3% and 89.1% of patients in the telithromycin and penicillin V groups, respectively, while clinical cure was achieved in 94.8% and 94.1% of patients, respectively. At late post-therapy, 82.4% of patients treated with telithromycin achieved a satisfactory bacteriologic outcome, compared with 84.7% of penicillin V recipients. The GABHS eradication rates for telithromycin and penicillin post-therapy were 85.2% and 89.1%, respectively, and 86.1% and 86.5%, respectively at late post-therapy. Both treatments were well tolerated, with a similar overall incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events. Short-course (5 d) therapy with telithromycin 800 mg once daily is comparable to a standard 10 d course of penicillin V for the treatment of GABHS pharyngitis/tonsillitis in adults and adolescents.     

Telithromycin is as effective as amoxicillin/clavulanate in acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis

This randomized, double-blind study evaluated the efficacy and safety of a short, 5-day course of telithromycin, a new ketolide antibacterial, compared with a standard 10-day course of amoxicillin/clavulanate, in the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB). The study enrolled 325 adult patients with AECB and a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Patients received either telithromycin 800 mg once daily (qd) for 5 days (followed by placebo for 5 days) or amoxicillin/clavulanate 500/125 mg three times daily (tid) for 10 days. Clinical cure rates for telithromycin post-therapy (Days 17-21, test-of-cure) and late post-therapy (Days 31-36) were 86.1 and 78.1%, respectively; 82.1 and 75.0% for amoxicillin/clavulanate. Excellent clinical cure rates were also observed for high-risk patients. Bacteriologic outcome was satisfactory for 69.2% of telithromycin recipients vs 70.0% for amoxicillin/clavulanate recipients. Both treatments were generally well tolerated, although the frequency of drug-related adverse events was almost two-fold higher for amoxicillin/clavulanate (25.0 vs. 13.1%). Thus, a 5-day course of telithromycin 800 mg qd is an effective and well-tolerated alternative to a standard 10-day course of amoxicillin/clavulanate 500/125 mg tid for first-line empiric treatment of AECB in adults with COPD.     

Activity of telithromycin against key pathogens associated with community-acquired respiratory tract infections

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the correlation between in vitro susceptibility of isolates and clinical outcomes with telithromycin in respiratory tract infections. METHODS: The activity of telithromycin was determined by in vitro susceptibility testing of key respiratory tract pathogens isolated from patients with community-acquired pneumonia, acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis or acute maxillary sinusitis enrolled in 14 Phase III/IV clinical trials evaluating the clinical efficacy of telithromycin. RESULTS: In this pooled analysis, telithromycin mode minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and MIC90, respectively, were: 0.016 and 0.03 mg/l against Streptococcus pneumoniae (n=626); 0.03 and 0.5 mg/l for penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae (n=56); 0.03 and 1 mg/l for erythromycin-resistant S. pneumoniae (n=81); 2 and 4 mg/l against Haemophilus influenzae (including beta-lactamase producers; n=627); both 0.12 mg/l for Moraxella catarrhalis (n=159) and both 0.25 mg/l for Staphylococcus aureus (n=124). Telithromycin (5 or 7-10 days) resulted in overall clinical and bacteriologic success rates of 88.1% (1593/1808) and 89% (1593/1789), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: High levels of in vitro susceptibility to telithromycin are paralleled by high rates of clinical cure and bacteriologic eradication.     

Efficacy of oral telithromycin in community-acquired pneumonia caused by resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae

The efficacy of oral telithromycin 800mg once daily for 7 days was evaluated in a multicentre, multinational study in patients with community-acquired pneumonia caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae resistant to penicillin and/or erythromycin. Per-protocol clinical and bacteriological outcomes were assessed 10-17 days post-therapy. Of the 129 patients with S. pneumoniae infection, 16 were infected with strains resistant to penicillin and/or erythromycin. Fifteen of these 16 patients (93.8%) were assessed as clinically and bacteriologically cured at the post-therapy visit.     

Oral moxifloxacin vs high-dosage amoxicillin in the treatment of mild-to-moderate, community-acquired, suspected pneumococcal pneumonia in adults

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Comparison of the efficacy and safety of moxifloxacin vs amoxicillin for treatment of mild-to-moderate, suspected pneumococcal community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in adult patients. DESIGN: Multinational, multicenter, double-blind, randomized study. SETTING: Eighty-two centers in 20 countries (Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Croatia, Czech Republic, Estonia, France, Hong Kong, Hungary, Lithuania, Mexico, Portugal, Russia, Slovenia, South Africa, Spain, Turkey, Ukraine, United Kingdom, and Uruguay). PATIENTS: Four hundred eleven adults (inpatients or outpatients) with suspected pneumococcal CAP. INTERVENTIONS: Randomization 1:1 to moxifloxacin, 400 mg/d, or amoxicillin, 1,000 g tid, for 10 days. RESULTS: Primary efficacy parameter was clinical response, 3 to 5 days after therapy (end of therapy [EOT]) in the per protocol (PP) population (362 patients). The clinical success rate in the PP population was 91.5% (moxifloxacin) and 89.7% (amoxicillin; two-sided 95% confidence interval, -4.2 to 7.8%). The clinical cure rate in patients with proven pneumococcal pneumonia was similar in both treatment groups (87.8%). The bacteriologic success rate in 136 bacteriologically evaluable patients at the EOT was 89.7% (moxifloxacin) and 82.4% (amoxicillin). The bacteriologic success rate against Streptococcus pneumoniae was 89.6% (moxifloxacin) and 84.8% (amoxicillin). The frequency of adverse events was comparable in both treatment groups. Digestive symptoms were the most common drug-related adverse events in both treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Moxifloxacin was statistically at least as effective as high-dose amoxicillin for treatment of mild-to-moderate, suspected pneumococcal CAP. Moxifloxacin may be an alternative for empiric CAP treatment, especially in areas where multidrug resistance in S pneumoniae is sufficiently prevalent to preclude routine penicillin.     

The presence of pneumococcal bacteremia does not influence clinical outcomes in patients with community-acquired pneumonia: results from the Community-Acquired Pneumonia Organization (CAPO) International Cohort study

BACKGROUND: It remains unknown whether pneumococcal bacteremia increases the risk of poor outcomes in hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). The objective of this study was to investigate whether the presence of pneumococcal bacteremia influences the clinical outcomes of hospitalized patients with CAP. METHODS: We performed secondary analyses of the Community-Acquired Pneumonia Organization database of hospitalized patients with CAP and pneumococcal bacteremia, and patients with CAP and negative blood culture findings. To identify the effect of pneumococcal bacteremia on patient outcomes, we modeled all-cause mortality and CAP-related mortality using logistic regression analysis, and time to clinical stability and length of hospital stay using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: We studied 125 subjects with pneumococcal bacteremic CAP and 1,847 subjects with nonbacteremic CAP. The multivariable regression analysis revealed a lack of association of pneumococcal bacteremic CAP and time to clinical stability (hazard ratio, 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.7 to 1.1; p = 0.25), length of hospital stay (hazard ratio, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.91 to 1.43; p = 0.25), all-cause mortality (odds ratio [OR], 0.68; 95% CI, 0.36 to 1.3; p = 0.25), and CAP-related mortality (OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.35 to 2.06; p = 0.73). CONCLUSIONS: Pneumococcal bacteremia does not increase the risk of poor outcomes in patients with CAP. Factors related to severity of disease are confounders of the association between pneumococcal bacteremia and poor outcomes. This study indicates that the presence of pneumococcal bacteremia by itself should not be a contraindication for deescalation of therapy in clinically stable hospitalized patients with CAP.     

Linezolid versus ceftriaxone/cefpodoxime in patients hospitalized for the treatment of Streptococcus pneumoniae pneumonia

Intravenous (i.v.) to oral linezolid (600 mg twice daily for both, with optional aztreonam) and a cephalosporin regimen (i.v. ceftriaxone 1 g twice daily followed by oral cefpodoxime 200 mg twice daily) were compared for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), with emphasis on patients with Streptococcus pneumoniae. This multicenter, randomized, open-label trial was conducted in 27 countries in 6 continents. Efficacy was assessed 12-28 d following treatment. Clinical and laboratory safety assessments were evaluated; isolates for microbiologic assessments were identified primarily by sputum or blood culture. In all treated patients (linezolid, n = 381; ceftriaxone/cefpodoxime, n = 366), linezolid had a higher clinical cure rate than ceftriaxone/cefpodoxime (83.0% vs. 76.4%, respectively; p = 0.040). S. pneumoniae was isolated in 73.2% (186/254) of patients at baseline, with similar eradication rates in the linezolid and ceftriaxone/cefpodoxime groups (88.7% vs. 89.9%, respectively; p = 0.830). Linezolid had a superior clinical cure rate (93.1% vs. 68.2%; p = 0.021) in patients with S. pneumoniae bacteremia. Logistic regression analyses revealed that linezolid-treated patients with bacteremia, pleural effusion, cardiac comorbidities, diabetes or abnormal white blood cell counts had significantly better outcomes than cephalosporin-treated patients. Both regimens were well tolerated, although the incidence of drug-related adverse events was higher in the linezolid group than in the ceftriaxone/cefpodoxime group (21.3% vs. 11.2%, respectively; p = 0.0002). In summary, empiric i.v./oral linezolid was more effective than ceftriaxone/cefpodoxime in patients hospitalized with CAP, with comparable cure rates in S. pneumoniae pneumonia and higher cure rates in pneumonia complicated by bacteremia.     

Clarithromycin extended-release tablet: a review of its use in the management of respiratory tract infections

Clarithromycin is an orally active, advanced-generation macrolide that has been reformulated as an extended-release tablet (Biaxin) XL Filmtab allowing convenient once-daily administration. The reformulation is intended to improve patient compliance and the tolerability of the drug. Although maximum plasma clarithromycin concentrations are lower and reached later with the extended-release tablets than with the immediate-release tablets, the two formulations are bioequivalent with respect to the area under the plasma concentration-time curve. Bioequivalence is also achieved between the formulations for the microbiologically active metabolite, 14-hydroxy-clarithromycin. Two randomized trials in patients with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB) showed that a 7-day course of clarithromycin extended-release 1000 mg once daily produced clinical cure rates of 83% and 85% and bacteriologic cure rates of 86% and 92% at the test-of-cure study visit. Similar rates of cure were achieved with a 7-day course of twice-daily clarithromycin immediate-release and with a 10-day course of twice-daily amoxicillin/clavulanic acid.A 7-day course of clarithromycin extended-release 1000 mg once daily produced clinical and bacteriologic cure rates of 88% and 86%, respectively, in patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Similar cure rates were achieved in recipients of once-daily levofloxacin in the same trial. In patients with acute maxillary sinusitis, a 14-day course of either once-daily clarithromycin extended-release or twice-daily clarithromycin immediate-release produced statistically equivalent clinical cure rates of 85% and 79%, respectively. Both treatment groups achieved similar rates of radiographic success and resolution of sinusitis. Recent results indicate that clarithromycin extended-release 500 mg once daily for 5 days is also effective in the treatment of patients with streptococcal pharyngitis/tonsillitis and in the treatment of AECB. The most frequently reported drug-related events with clarithromycin extended-release were abnormal taste (7% incidence), diarrhea (6%) and nausea (3%). Most adverse drug reactions were of a mild and transient nature. In comparative clinical trials, clarithromycin extended-release had an improved gastrointestinal tolerability profile compared with the immediate-release formulation. In addition, clarithromycin extended-release was better tolerated than amoxicillin/clavulanic acid and as well tolerated as levofloxacin. Further studies are required to assess the cost-effectiveness ratio of clarithromycin relative to comparator antibacterial agents. CONCLUSION: Clarithromycin extended-release is an effective treatment for AECB, CAP, acute maxillary sinusitis, and pharyngitis (although not approved for the latter in the US), and is administered in a convenient dosage regimen that has the potential to encourage good compliance. The reformulation modulates clarithromycin absorption kinetics thereby improving tolerability. Therefore, clarithromycin extended-release provides a useful option for the treatment of specific respiratory tract infections.     

Five-day telithromycin once daily is as effective as 10-day clarithromycin twice daily for the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis and is associated with reduced health-care resource utilization

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To demonstrate equivalence in the clinical efficacy of telithromycin vs clarithromycin treatment of outpatients with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB), and to compare the tolerability and respiratory-related health-care resource utilization associated with these treatment regimens. DESIGN AND PATIENTS: A randomized, double-blind, multicenter, clinical study was conducted at 105 centers in 14 countries. Adult outpatients (age > or = 30 years) received oral telithromycin, 800 mg qd for 5 days (n = 270), or oral clarithromycin, 500 mg bid for 10 days (n = 282), for the treatment of AECB. Clinical and bacteriologic outcomes were assessed at the posttherapy/test-of-cure (TOC) visit (days 17 to 24; per-protocol population). Health-care resource utilization data were collected for each patient by investigators blinded to study medication up to the late posttherapy visit (days 31 to 36). RESULTS: Clinical cure rates at the posttherapy/TOC visit were comparable between the groups (telithromycin, 193 of 225 patients [85.8%]; clarithromycin, 206 of 231 patients [89.2%]); bacteriologic outcome was satisfactory for 59 of 72 telithromycin-treated patients (81.9%) vs 63 of 76 clarithromycin-treated patients (82.9%). Health-care resource utilization assessed up to the late posttherapy visit was lower in the telithromycin treatment group than the clarithromycin treatment group, with significantly fewer hospitalizations for respiratory-related causes (one hospitalization vs eight hospitalizations for a total of 4 inpatient days vs 39 inpatient days, respectively), significantly fewer AECB-related emergency department visits (0 vs 8), and fewer unscheduled outpatient visits (11 vs 18). Fewer telithromycin-treated patients reported days lost from work (21 of 91 patients [23.1%]; 133 days) compared with those receiving clarithromycin (30 of 98 patients [30.6%]; 141 days). Telithromycin was well tolerated; adverse events considered possibly related to study medication were reported by 61 of 269 patients (22.7%) and 100 of 280 patients (35.7%) receiving telithromycin and clarithromycin, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, 5-day telithromycin treatment was as effective and well tolerated as 10-day clarithromycin treatment for patients with AECB, and was associated with a reduced utilization of health-care resources.     

Gemifloxacin once daily for 7 days compared to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid thrice daily for 10 days for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia of suspected pneumococcal origin

CONTEXT: Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is common among adults and contributes considerably to morbidity and mortality. OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety and efficacy of gemifloxacin to high-dose amoxicillin/clavulanate for the treatment of CAP of suspected pneumococcal origin. DESIGN: Randomized, multicentre, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel group Phase III study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: From September 1998 to July 1999, 324 patients with CAP were randomized at 102 centers in France, Poland and the Republic of South Africa. INTERVENTION: Patients were double-blind randomized to receive either oral gemifloxacin 320 mg once daily for 7 days or oral amoxicillin/clavulanate 1 g/125 mg three times daily for 10 days. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome measures were clinical, bacteriological, and radiological responses at the end of therapy (day 12-14) and follow-up (day 24-30) visits. RESULTS: In 228 PP patients, clinical resolution at follow-up was 88.7% for 7-day gemifloxacin and 87.6% for 10-day amoxicillin/clavulanate [95% CI, -7.3, 9.5]. In 249 PP patients, clinical resolution at end of therapy was 95.3% for 7-day gemifloxacin vs. 90.1% for 10-day amoxicillin/clavulanate [95% CI, -1.2, 11.7]. Bacteriologic response rates for the PP patients at end of therapy were 96.3% for 7-day gemifloxacin and 91.8% for the amoxicillin/clavulanate group [95% CI, -4.7, 13.6]. Bacteriologic response rates at follow-up were 87.2% for 7-day gemifloxacin and 89.1% for the amoxicillin/clavulanate group [95% CI, -15.0, 11.2]. Specifically gemifloxacin eradicated 95.7% of Streptococcus pneumoniae including penicillin and macrolide resistant strains. Radiological response rates for the PP patients at end of therapy were 89.1% for 7-day gemifloxacin and 87.6% for the amoxicillin/clavulanate group. The most frequently reported drug-related events were in the gemifloxacin group, diarrhea (6.0%) and rash (3.0%) and in the amoxicillin/clavulanate group, diarrhea (11.1%) and fungal infection, vaginitis and vomiting (each 2.0%). Overall there were statistically fewer withdrawals due to lack of therapeutic effect in the gemifloxacin group compared with the amoxicillin/clavulanate cohort, (95% CI, -8.8;0.6; P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Gemifloxacin 320 mg once daily for 7 days was found to be clinically, bacteriologically, and radiologically as effective as 10 days of amoxicillin/clavulanate 1 g/125 mg three times daily for the treatment of suspected pneumococcal CAP.     

Streptococcus pneumoniae infections in 47 hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients: clinical characteristics of infections and vaccine-breakthrough infections, 1989-2005

Streptococcus pneumoniae infections can cause serious systemic disease in patients following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), and the response to pneumococcal vaccine is inadequate in most HSCT recipients. We evaluated the clinical spectrum of pneumococcal disease and vaccine-breakthrough infections in HSCT recipients at our cancer center in a retrospective analysis of all consecutive episodes of S. pneumoniae infection from 1989 through 2005. During the study period, 7888 patients underwent HSCT at our center; we identified 47 HSCT recipients with 54 S. pneumoniae infections. The overall incidence of S. pneumoniae infection was 7 per 1000 HSCTs. The incidence was higher in recipients of allogeneic grafts than in recipients of autologous grafts (9 vs. 5 per 1000 HSCTs, respectively; p 相似文献   

Relief of symptoms in patients with group A beta-hemolytic streptococcus tonsillopharyngitis: comparison between telithromycin and penicillin V

This study compared the resolution of symptoms in patients with group A beta-hemolytic streptococcus tonsillopharyngitis treated with 5 d of telithromycin 800 mg once daily, or 10 d of penicillin V 500 mg 3 times daily. At days 3-5 of treatment, the mean improvement in total symptom score was greater with telithromycin than with penicillin V (p = 0.042). Thus, telithromycin provided faster symptom relief than penicillin V.     

The efficacy and safety of two oral moxifloxacin regimens compared to oral clarithromycin in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia.

An international multi-centre, randomized, prospective, double-blind study compared oral moxifloxacin (200 mg or 400 mg once daily for 10 days) with oral clarithromycin (500 mg, twice daily for 10 days) in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). The clinical success rate in the evaluable population at the primary efficacy assessment, 3-5 days after the end of study treatment, was 93.9% in patients treated with 200 mg moxifloxacin; 94.4%, with 400 mg moxifloxacin; and 94.3%, with clarithromycin. Clinical success rates were maintained at follow-up, 21-28 days after the end of treatment: 90.7% (200 mg moxifloxacin), 92.8% (400 mg moxifloxacin) and 92.2% (clarithromycin). The 95% confidence intervals indicated that all three treatment regimens were equally effective in treating CAP. At follow-up, the 400 mg moxifloxacin dose had a slightly higher observed cure rate than the 200 mg moxifloxacin dose, but this was not statistically significant. The most frequently isolated pathogens were Streptococcus pneumoniae (42%), Haemophilus influenzae (19%), Haemophilus parainfluenzae (10%), Moraxella catarrhalis (6%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (5%) and Staphylococcus aureus (4%). The bacteriological success rate (eradication and presumed eradication) was 72.5% (29/40) for 200 mg moxifloxacin, 78.7% (37/47) for 400 mg moxifloxacin and 70.7% (29/41) for clarithromycin. The adverse event profile was comparable between the three treatment groups. Most adverse events, possibly or probably related to the study drug, were generally mild or moderate in severity and mostly related to the digestive system: diarrhoea, nausea and abdominal pain in 200 mg moxifloxacin patients; diarrhoea, liver function abnormalities and nausea in 400 mg moxifloxacin patients and liver function abnormalities, diarrhoea, nausea and taste perversion in clarithromycin patients. Study drugs were discontinued because of adverse events in 7/229 (3%) patients treated with 200 mg moxifloxacin, 11/224 (5%) with moxifloxacin 400 mg and 11/222 (5%) with clarithromycin. In all assessments, moxifloxacin was at least as effective clinically, and as well tolerated as clarithromycin in the treatment of CAP. Bacteriological success rates in moxifloxacin-treated patients were greater than those of clarithromycin. Moxifloxacin, given once daily, is free of many drug-drug interactions and requires no dosage adjustments in most renal hepatic deficient patients.     

Streptococcus pneumoniae infections and bacteremia in patients with acquired immune deficiency syndrome, with report of a pneumococcal vaccine failure

Five patients had Streptococcus pneumoniae infections among the 35 hospitalized with acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) at the New York Veterans Administration Medical Center between January 1, 1982, and June 30, 1983. Three of these patients had pneumococcal bacteremia and 2 had pneumonia without bacteremia. Twenty-seven bacteremic S. pneumoniae infections occurred among 5,143 patients without AIDS admitted to the Medical Service of this hospital during the same period. Thus, pneumococcal bacteremia was more likely to occur in patients with AIDS than in the general hospitalized population (x2 = 26, p = less than 0.001). Two of the bacteremic infections were caused by S. pneumoniae type 4. One of these occurred in a patient who had been inoculated with the 14 valent pneumococcal vaccine 5 months earlier. There were no significant differences in concentrations of radioimmunoassay antibody to type 4 pneumococcal polysaccharide in sequential serum samples collected from this patient, and opsonic titers to this organism were not detected. It is concluded that pneumococcal infections are very common among patients with AIDS, and may not be prevented by active immunoprophylaxis.     

Treatment of acute exacerbation of severe-to-very severe COPD with azithromycin in patients vaccinated against Streptococcus pneumoniae

Sixty-five consecutive eligible adult patients, who were treated as outpatients for stable severe-to-very severe COPD, were enrolled in the study. All of them received 23-valent pneumococcal capsular polysaccharide vaccine intramuscularly. Patients were seen monthly, as well as whenever they had symptoms suggestive of an exacerbation, at our outpatient clinic. Eighteen out of 65 patients suffered from acute exacerbation (AECOPD). Three of these patients presented two episodes of AECOPD. Patients with an acute exacerbation of COPD received azithromycin 500 mg/day once daily for 3 days and a short course of oral prednisolone 25 mg/die. In 16 cases, a single species was isolated, while in the remaining 5 cases at least two species were recovered. Clinical cure or improvement at the end of therapy (3-5 days post-therapy) was reported in 17 episodes of AECOPD with no relapse at the late post-therapy (10-14 days after the completion of treatment). Bacteriologic eradication or presumptive eradication rates at the end of therapy were 86% (24 out of 28 isolates). Azithromycin eradicated all isolates of Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, H. parainfluenzae, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Klebsiella spp. isolated at baseline. Eradication of Sta aureus occurred in 1 of 3 isolates whereas azithromycin was unable to eradicate Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates. Our data seem to indicate that pneumococcal vaccination reduces the possibility that an AECOPD is caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae. This finding allows the use of antibiotics such as azithromycin, which, otherwise, should be avoided because of resistances.