Phase I dose-escalation study of intravenous aflibercept administered in combination with irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with advanced solid tumours

BackgroundTo determine dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), recommended phase II trial dose (RPTD), safety, preliminary antitumour activity and pharmacokinetics of intravenous aflibercept with irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (LV5FU2).Patients and methodsIn this open-label study, 38 patients with advanced solid tumours received aflibercept 2, 4, 5, or 6 mg/kg on day 1, then irinotecan and LV5FU2 on days 1 and 2 every 2 weeks.ResultsTwo grade 3/4 aflibercept-associated DLTs occurred with 4 mg/kg: proteinuria lasting >2 weeks and acute nephrotic syndrome with thrombotic microangiopathy. Two DLTs with 5 mg/kg (grade 3 stomatitis and grade 3 oesophagitis reflux) and three with 6 mg/kg (febrile neutropenia, grade 3 stomatitis and grade 3 abdominal pain) were considered related to concurrent chemotherapy and underlying disease. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia, hypertension and diarrhoea. Nine patients had partial responses, five with 4 mg/kg. Twenty-two patients had stable disease (five with 4 mg/kg), lasting >3 months in 17 patients. No anti-aflibercept antibodies were detected. Free aflibercept was in excess of bound in most patients on 4 mg/kg.ConclusionBased on pharmacokinetics, acceptable safety and encouraging antitumour activity, aflibercept 4 mg/kg was selected as the RPTD with irinotecan and LV5FU2 every 2 weeks.     

Phase I dose-escalation study of docetaxel, nedaplatin, and 5-fluorouracil combination chemotherapy in patients with advanced esophageal cancer

More effective protocols are needed for unresectable and recurrent esophageal cancer. Therefore, we conducted a phase I trial to establish the recommended dose of docetaxel, nedaplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (DNF) as combination chemotherapy. Fourteen patients with esophageal cancer were enrolled and received DNF combination therapy at different dose levels according to the treatment and examination plan. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) included febrile neutropenia. DLTs occurred in 3/5 patients at level 4. The recommended doses (level 3) of DNF were 60 mg/m² (day 1), 70 mg/m² (day 1), and 700 mg/m² (days 1–5), respectively, given at 3-week intervals. In conclusion, DNF combined chemotherapy for advanced esophageal cancer was associated with relatively minor adverse events and was safely administered at the recommended dose. A phase II study is now underway.     

Sunitinib in combination with docetaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors: a phase I dose-escalation study

Purpose

Sunitinib in combination with docetaxel enhances antitumor activity in xenograft models of human breast and non-small cell lung cancer. We assessed the maximum tolerated doses (MTDs), safety, pharmacokinetic profiles, and preliminary efficacy of sunitinib plus docetaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Methods

In this phase I study, successive patient cohorts received sunitinib 25, 37.5, or 50 mg/day for 4 weeks of a 6-week cycle (Schedule 4/2, 4 weeks on, 2 weeks off) or for 2 weeks of a 3-week cycle (Schedule 2/1, 2 weeks on, 1 week off) with docetaxel 60 or 75 mg/m² IV q21d to determine the MTDs of this treatment combination.

Results

Fifty patients enrolled: 10 on Schedule 4/2 and 40 on Schedule 2/1. MTDs were established as sunitinib 25 mg on Schedule 4/2 with docetaxel 60 mg/m² q21d, and as sunitinib 37.5 mg on Schedule 2/1 with docetaxel 75 mg/m² q21d. On Schedule 2/1, the most frequent dose-limiting toxicity was neutropenia (±fever; grade [G]3/4, n = 5) and the most common G3/4 non-hematologic adverse event (AE) was fatigue (G3, n = 8). Hematologic AEs were managed with growth factor support in 11 of 23 (48%) patients treated at Schedule 2/1 MTD. Three patients achieved a partial response at the Schedule 2/1 MTD. There were no pharmacokinetic drug–drug interactions with either schedule.

Conclusions

Oral sunitinib 37.5 mg/day on Schedule 2/1 with docetaxel 75 mg/m² IV q21d is a clinically feasible regimen with a manageable safety profile, no pharmacokinetic drug–drug interactions, and shows antitumor activity in patients with advanced solid tumors.     

Phase I dose-escalation study of brostallicin, a minor groove binder, in combination with cisplatin in patients with advanced solid tumors

Purpose

Brostallicin is a DNA minor groove binder which shows enhanced antitumor activity in cells which are resistant to several anticancer agents due to their high glutathione S-transferase (GST)/glutathione content. Phase I and II clinical trials of single-agent brostallicin have shown that myelotoxicity is the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), while hints of antitumor activity were mainly observed in soft tissue sarcoma. Preclinical studies showing a more than additive antitumor effect of the cisplatin–brostallicin combination paved the way to clinical combination studies. In particular, we set up the first clinical combination study of brostallicin and cisplatin in patients with advanced solid tumors. This study was to be followed by a phase II study in patients with recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN).

Methods

Escalating doses of brostallicin were administered in combination with a fixed dose of cisplatin (75 mg/m²) in patients with recurrent or metastatic advanced solid tumors who had previously received a cumulative dose of cisplatin not higher than 475 mg/m². The recommended dose of brostallicin was expanded in order to have a better estimate of antitumor activity and to better define the safety profile of the combination.

Results

Twenty-one patients were treated. Two DLTs (grade 3 fatigue and febrile neutropenia) were observed at dose level 3 (brostallicin 9 mg/m²). Dose level 2 (brostallicin 7 mg/m² and cisplatin 75 mg/m²) was recommended for future phase II studies. Main toxicity was hematologic; in fact, only 1 patient out of 21 did not develop neutropenia and only 2 patients did not have thrombocytopenia. Grade 3–4 neutropenia was observed in 90.5% of patients, grade 3–4 thrombocytopenia in 38.1%, grade 3–4 anemia in 23.8%. The cycle 1 nadir (ANC < 500 × 10⁹/L) for neutrophils was Day 14 (median; range 11–17) with recovery to an ANC of >1,500 3.5 days after nadir (median; range 2–4) at dose level 3. The cycle 1 nadir (median of 51,000 × 10⁹/L) for platelets occurred on Day 13 (median; range 10–15) with recovery to a platelet count of >100,000 4 days after nadir (median; range 2–8). No objective responses were observed, but seven patients had a long lasting (>18 weeks) stable disease.

Conclusions

Further studies of the combination of brostallicin and cisplatin are warranted.     

Phase I dose-escalation study of aflibercept in combination with docetaxel and cisplatin in patients with advanced solid tumours

Background:

This phase I cohort study investigated aflibercept (vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) trap) plus docetaxel and cisplatin in patients with advanced solid tumours.

Methods:

Patients received intravenous aflibercept 4, 5, or 6 mg kg⁻¹ with docetaxel and cisplatin (75 mg m⁻² each) on day 1 of a 3-week cycle until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity. Primary objectives were determining cycle 1 dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and the aflibercept recommended phase II trial dose (RP2D) for this combination.

Results:

During the dose-escalation phase (n=16), there were two DLTs of febrile neutropenia (at 4 and 5 mg kg⁻¹). Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor prophylaxis was subsequently recommended. The RP2D of aflibercept was established at 6 mg kg⁻¹ and administered to 14 additional patients. The most frequent grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) were neutropenia (43.3%), stomatitis (20.0%), asthenia/fatigue (20.0%), and hypertension (16.7%). All-grade AEs associated with VEGF blockade included epistaxis (83.3%), dysphonia (70.0%), proteinuria (53.3%), and hypertension (50.0%). There were five partial responses (16.7%) and 18 cases of stable disease (60.0%) (lasting >3 months in 10 patients). There were no pharmacokinetic (PK) interactions between the three drugs.

Conclusion:

Aflibercept 6 mg kg⁻¹ with docetaxel and cisplatin 75 mg m⁻² every 3 weeks is the RP2D based on tolerability, antitumour activity, and PKs.     

Phase I dose-escalation study of the HSP90 inhibitor AUY922 in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors

Purpose

AUY922 is a potent non-geldanamycin inhibitor of heat-shock protein 90. This study was carried out in Japanese patients to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and to characterize safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of single-agent AUY922.

Methods

Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors whose disease had progressed on at least one line of standard therapy, or for whom no standard therapy existed, were treated with AUY922 (intravenous, once-weekly, 28-day cycle, starting dose 8 mg/m²).

Results

Thirty-one patients were treated. Two DLTs were reported in one patient of the 54 mg/m² cohort; fatigue and decreased appetite (both Grade 3, resolving to Grade 1 within 8 days). No MTD was determined, and the dose recommended for Phase II studies was determined to be 70 mg/m² once-weekly. Most common drug-related toxicities were diarrhea, night blindness and nausea. Grade 1 and 2 visual toxicities at high AUY922 doses  ≥22 mg/m² were observed. Ten patients (32 %) achieved a best overall response of stable disease, and one patient (3 %) achieved a confirmed partial response.

Conclusion

Overall, AUY922 exhibited acceptable toxicities and demonstrated potential clinical activity in Japanese patients, with similar safety and pharmacokinetic profiles to those reported in a preceding global Phase I study in Western patients (CAUY922A2101).     

A Phase I study of pazopanib in combination with gemcitabine in patients with advanced solid tumors

Purpose

Pazopanib plus gemcitabine combination therapy was explored in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Methods

In a modified 3 + 3 enrollment scheme, oral once-daily pazopanib was administered with intravenous gemcitabine (Days 1 and 8, 21-day cycles). Three protocol-specified dose levels were tested: pazopanib 400 mg plus gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m², pazopanib 800 mg plus gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m², and pazopanib 800 mg plus gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m². Maximum-tolerated dose was based on dose-limiting toxicities during treatment Cycle 1. In the expansion phase, six additional patients were enrolled at the highest tolerable dose level.

Results

Twenty-two patients were enrolled. At the highest dose level tested (pazopanib 800 plus gemcitabine 1,250), patients received >80 % of their planned dose and the regimen was deemed safe and tolerable. The most common treatment-related adverse events included fatigue, neutropenia, nausea, and decreased appetite. Neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were the most common events leading to dose modifications. Pharmacokinetic interaction between pazopanib and gemcitabine was not observed. One objective partial response at the highest dose was observed in a patient with metastatic melanoma. Prolonged disease stabilization (>12 cycles) was reported in three patients (metastatic melanoma, cholangiocarcinoma, and colorectal carcinoma).

Conclusion

Combination pazopanib plus gemcitabine therapy is tolerable, with an adverse event profile reflective of that associated with the individual agents. There was no apparent pharmacokinetic interaction with pazopanib plus gemcitabine co-administration, although patient numbers were limited. Further investigation of combined pazopanib plus gemcitabine is warranted.     

Phase I dose-escalation study of AZD7762, a checkpoint kinase inhibitor,in combination with gemcitabine in US patients with advanced solid tumors

Purpose

AZD7762 is a Chk1 kinase inhibitor which increases sensitivity to DNA-damaging agents, including gemcitabine. We evaluated the safety of AZD7762 monotherapy and with gemcitabine in advanced solid tumor patients.

Experimental design

In this Phase I study, patients received intravenous AZD7762 on days 1 and 8 of a 14-day run-in cycle (cycle 0; AZD7762 monotherapy), followed by AZD7762 plus gemcitabine 750–1,000 mg/m² on days 1 and 8, every 21 days, in ascending AZD7762 doses (cycle 1; combination therapy).

Results

Forty-two patients received AZD7762 6 mg (n = 9), 9 mg (n = 3), 14 mg (n = 6), 21 mg (n = 3), 30 mg (n = 7), 32 mg (n = 6), and 40 mg (n = 8), in combination with gemcitabine. Common adverse events (AEs) were fatigue [41 % (17/42) patients], neutropenia/leukopenia [36 % (15/42) patients], anemia/Hb decrease [29 % (12/42) patients] and nausea, pyrexia and alanine aminotransferase/aspartate aminotransferase increase [26 % (11/42) patients each]. Grade ≥3 AEs occurred in 19 and 52 % of patients in cycles 0 and 1, respectively. Cardiac dose-limiting toxicities occurred in two patients (both AZD7762 monotherapy): grade 3 troponin I increase (32 mg) and grade 3 myocardial ischemia with chest pain, electrocardiogram changes, decreased left ventricular ejection fraction, and increased troponin I (40 mg). AZD7762 exposure increased linearly. Gemcitabine did not affect AZD7762 pharmacokinetics. Two non-small-cell lung cancer patients achieved partial tumor responses (AZD7762 6 mg/gemcitabine 750 mg/m² and AZD7762 9 mg cohort).

Conclusions

The maximum-tolerated dose of AZD7762 in combination with gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m² was 30 mg. Although development of AZD7762 is not going forward owing to unpredictable cardiac toxicity, Chk1 remains an important therapeutic target.     

Phase I study of pazopanib in combination with weekly paclitaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors

Purpose.

To evaluate the maximum tolerated regimen (MTR), dose-limiting toxicities, and pharmacokinetics of pazopanib, an oral small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor, platelet-derived growth factor receptor, and c-Kit, in combination with paclitaxel.

Patients and Methods.

Pazopanib was given daily with weekly paclitaxel on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days. Dose levels of pazopanib (mg/day)/paclitaxel (mg/m²) were 400/15, 800/15, 800/50, and 800/80. An expanded cohort was enrolled at the MTR. Plasma samples were collected to evaluate the effect of pazopanib, an inhibitor of cytochrome P450 (CYP)3A4, on the pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel, a CYP3A4 and CYP2C8 substrate.

Results.

Of 26 enrolled patients, 17 were treated at the MTR of 800 mg pazopanib and 80 mg/m² paclitaxel. Dose-limiting toxicities included a grade 3 abscess and grade 2 hyperbilirubinemia. Other toxicities included elevated liver transaminases and diarrhea. Six patients (23%) had partial responses and 15 patients (58%) had stable disease. Administration of 800 mg pazopanib resulted in a 14% lower paclitaxel clearance and a 31% higher paclitaxel maximal concentration than with administration of paclitaxel alone at 15, 50, and 80 mg/m². At the MTR, coadministration of 800 mg pazopanib and 80 mg/m² paclitaxel resulted in a 26% higher geometric mean paclitaxel area under the curve.

Conclusion.

Pazopanib, at a dose of 800 mg daily, can be safely combined with a therapeutic dose of paclitaxel at 80 mg/m² when administered on days 1, 8, and 15, every 28 days. The observed greater plasma concentrations of paclitaxel given concurrently with pazopanib suggest that pazopanib is a weak inhibitor of CYP3A4 and CYP2C8.     

Phase I, dose-escalation study of AZD7762 alone and in combination with gemcitabine in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumours

Purpose

AZD7762, a potent Chk1/Chk2 inhibitor, has shown chemosensitizing activity with gemcitabine in xenograft models.

Methods

This open-label, Phase I, dose-escalation study evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and preliminary efficacy (RECIST) of AZD7762 alone and in combination with gemcitabine in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumours (NCT00937664). Patients received intravenous AZD7762 alone on days 1 and 8 of a 14-day cycle (cycle 0), followed by AZD7762 plus gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m² on days 1 and 8 of 22-day cycles, in ascending AZD7762 dose cohorts.

Results

Twenty patients received AZD7762 at doses of 6 mg (n = 3), 9 mg (n = 3), 21 mg (n = 6) and 30 mg (n = 8). Dose-limiting toxicities occurred in 2/6 evaluable patients in the 30-mg cohort: one, CTCAE grade 3 elevated troponin T (cycle 0: AZD7762 monotherapy); one, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and elevated aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase (cycle 1: combination therapy). The 30 mg dose was therefore regarded as non-tolerable. The most common adverse events (AEs) in cycle 0 (AZD7762 monotherapy) were bradycardia (50 %), hypertension (25 %) and fatigue (15 %). Overall, the most common AEs were bradycardia (55 %), neutropenia (45 %) and hypertension, fatigue and rash (30 % each). Grade ≥3 AEs were reported in 11 patients, the most common being neutropenia (45 %) and leukopenia (25 %). AZD7762 exposure increased approximately linearly. Gemcitabine did not appear to affect AZD7762 PK. There were no objective responses; five patients (all lung cancer) had stable disease.

Conclusions

The maximum tolerated dose of AZD7762 in combination with gemcitabine, 1,000 mg/m² was determined as 21 mg in Japanese patients.     

Phase I study of olaratumab in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors

Olaratumab (IMC‐3G3) is a fully human IgG1 monoclonal antibody that selectively binds the external domain of human platelet‐derived growth factor receptor‐α with high affinity and blocks ligand binding. This was a single‐center, dose‐escalation, phase I trial of olaratumab in Japanese patients with advanced/refractory solid malignancies. Three to six patients were enrolled into each of three cohorts: Patients received i.v. olaratumab: 10 mg/kg on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (cohort 1); 20 mg/kg every 2 weeks (cohort 2); and 15 mg/kg on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (cohort 3). Doses were escalated from cohort 1 through cohort 3. The primary objective was to establish the safety and pharmacokinetic profile of olaratumab. Sixteen patients were treated across three cohorts. There were no dose‐limiting toxicities, so the maximum tolerated dose was not reached. The most common olaratumab‐related treatment‐emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were proteinuria (25.0%) and elevated aspartate transaminase (12.5%). One patient (cohort 2) had two olaratumab‐related Grade 3 TEAEs (increased aspartate aminotransferase and tumor hemorrhage); otherwise, olaratumab‐related TEAEs were Grade 1/2. Seven patients (43.8%) had a best response of stable disease. Based on the pharmacokinetic concentration profile of olaratumab, the trough concentrations following single and multiple doses at 15 mg/kg on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (cohort 3) and multiple doses at 20 mg/kg every 2 weeks (cohort 2) were above the 155 μg/mL target. Thus, these two doses could represent an acceptable schedule for future trials in Japanese patients. Olaratumab had an acceptable safety profile and was well tolerated.     

Phase I clinical trial of bortezomib in combination with gemcitabine in patients with advanced solid tumors

BACKGROUND: Bortezomib is the first proteasome inhibitor to show preliminary evidence of activity against solid tumors. Findings from preclinical studies prompted a Phase I trial to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of bortezomib in combination with gemcitabine in patients with recurring/refractory advanced solid tumors. The effect of gemcitabine on proteasome inhibition by bortezomib in whole blood was also investigated. METHODS: Bortezomib was administered as an intravenous bolus injection on Days 1, 4, 8, and 11, with gemcitabine (30-minute infusion) on Days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. Groups of > or =3 patients were evaluated at each dose level. Escalating doses of gemcitabine 500 mg/m(2) to 1000 mg/m(2) with bortezomib 1.0 mg/m(2) to 1.5 mg/m(2) were planned. RESULTS: There were no DLTs in patients receiving bortezomib 1.0 mg/m(2) and gemcitabine 500 mg/m(2) to 1000 mg/m(2) in the first 3 dose levels. Dose-limiting nausea, vomiting, gastrointestinal obstruction, and thrombocytopenia occurred in 4 of 5 evaluable patients in dose level 4 (bortezomib 1.3 mg/m(2), gemcitabine 800 mg/m(2)), establishing bortezomib 1.0 mg/m(2) and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) as the MTD. Most common Grade > or =3 toxicities were neutropenia (6 patients), thrombocytopenia (5 patients), gastrointestinal disorders (6 patients), and general disorders (4 patients) such as fatigue. One patient with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma achieved a partial response and 7 achieved stable disease. Inhibition of 20S proteasome activity by bortezomib was unaffected by gemcitabine coadministration. CONCLUSION: Dosages of bortezomib and gemcitabine suitable for further evaluation of antitumor activity have been established.     

Phase I trial of bortezomib in combination with docetaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors.

PURPOSE: Bortezomib (PS-341), a first-in-class proteasome inhibitor, is metabolized by deboronation involving cytochrome P4503A (CYP3A), which also metabolizes docetaxel. Preclinical studies have shown synergy between bortezomib and taxanes. We conducted a phase I study combining bortezomib and docetaxel in refractory solid tumor patients. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients received escalating doses of weekly docetaxel (days 1 and 8) and twice weekly bortezomib (days 2, 5, 9, and 12) in 3-week cycles. Two subjects were enrolled at each dose level, with cohort expansion to six for dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Dose levels 1, 2, and 3 consisted of docetaxel/bortezomib 25/0.8, 25/1.0, and 30/1.0 mg/m(2), respectively. CYP3A activity and docetaxel pharmacokinetic studies were conducted, and proteasome inhibition was assessed. RESULTS: Fourteen patients received a total of 34 cycles of treatment. Dose level 2 was expanded for DLT that occurred in two of six patients consisting of febrile neutropenia in one patient and grade 3 thrombocytopenia in one patient. One patient received two cycles at dose level 3 with dose reduction to dose level 2, where grade 3 thrombocytopenia occurred at cycle 3. Both episodes of grade 3 thrombocytopenia were transient (<7 days). Dose level 1 was then expanded to six patients where no DLTs occurred. CYP3A activity and docetaxel clearance did not change between weeks 1 and 5. CONCLUSIONS: The maximum tolerated dose was docetaxel 25 mg/m(2) (days 1 and 8) with bortezomib 0.8 mg/m(2) (days 2, 5, 9, and 12) given every 21 days. Bortezomib treatment did not alter CYP3A activity and docetaxel clearance.     

A dose-escalation study of oxaliplatin and vinorelbine in patients with advanced solid tumors

OBJECTIVES: Vinorelbine (V) and oxaliplatin (OX) have shown interesting activity in a wide range of solid tumors. A phase I study was conducted in order to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of their combination in patients with refractory solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-eight patients with histologically confirmed non-small-cell lung cancer, ovarian cancer and breast cancer who had failed at least one prior chemotherapy regimen were enrolled. The patients' median age was 60 years, 33 were female, and 27 had a performance status (WHO) of 0-1. V was administered on days 1 and 8 as a 1-hour intravenous infusion at escalated doses ranging from 20 to 27 mg/m2. OX was administered on days 1 and 8 at escalated doses ranging from 40 to 55 mg/m2, following V administration. Treatment was repeated every 3 weeks. RESULTS: At the dose of V 27 mg/m2 and OX 55 mg/m2 3 out of 6 enrolled patients presented DLTs (2 patients grade 4 neutropenia and 1 treatment delay at day 8), and, thus, the recommended MTD for future phase II studies are V 27 mg/m2 and OX 50 mg/m2. A total of 131 treatment cycles were administered. Grade 3/4 neutropenia complicated 23 (18%) treatment cycles. There was one septic death. The main nonhematologic toxicities were grade 2/3 nausea/vomiting (17 cycles; 13%), grade 2 neurotoxicity (6 cycles; 5%) and grade 2/3 asthenia (21 cycles; 16%). One CR (4%), 5 PR (20%) and 4 SD (16%) were observed amongst the 25 evaluable patients. All responses were observed in patients with ovarian and breast cancer. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this phase I study demonstrate that V and OX can be combined at clinically effective and relevant doses to be further evaluated in patients with breast and ovarian cancer.     

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of CCI-779, a novel cytostatic cell-cycle inhibitor, in combination with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with advanced solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: CCI-779 is a novel ester of the immunosuppressive agent sirolimus that exerts cytostatic effects by the inhibition of the translation of cell-cycle regulatory proteins. We investigated the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and pharmacokinetics (PK) of CCI-779 in combination with leucovorin (LV) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in patients with advanced solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were treated with LV at 200 mg/m(2) as a 1-h i.v. infusion directly followed by continuous 24-h i.v. infusion of 5-FU, in the first patient at 2000 mg/m(2) and in subsequent patients at 2600 mg/m(2). CCI-779 was administered directly prior to LV as a 30-min i.v. infusion at a starting dose of 15 mg/m(2) beginning at day 8 and escalated in subsequent cohorts of patients. One cycle consisted of six weekly administrations followed by 1 week of rest. Blood samples were drawn to assess PK of CCI-779 as well as its effect on steady-state 5-FU exposures. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients entered the study, the majority having tumor types for which 5-FU is used as a treatment. CCI-779 doses of 15, 25, 45 and 75 mg/m(2) were investigated. Skin toxicity (rash) was prominent at all dose levels examined. Stomatitis was the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) for 75 mg/m(2) doses of CCI-779. Subsequently the cohort at 45 mg/m(2) was expanded to a total of 15 patients, and at this dose level two treatment-related deaths occurred due to mucositis with bowel perforation. Based on the toxicities observed, it was decided to discontinue the study. Partial responses were observed in three patients with gastrointestinal tumors. No pharmacokinetic interaction between CCI-779 and 5-FU was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The safety profiles of CCI-779 and 5-FU/LV suggest an overlap of drug-related toxicities, and the administration of these drugs at these doses and schedule resulted in unacceptable toxicity and therefore cannot be recommended. If CCI-779 is to be used in combination with 5-FU/LV, other doses or schedules of administration will need to be explored.     

Phase I pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of lapatinib in combination with sorafenib in patients with advanced refractory solid tumors

BackgroundThe epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and ERBB2 (HER2) pathways and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-dependent angiogenesis have a pivotal role in cancer pathogenesis and progression. Robust experimental evidence has shown that these pathways are functionally linked and implicated in acquired resistance to targeted therapies making them attractive candidates for joined targeting. We undertook this phase I trial to assess the safety, the recommended dose for phase II trials (RPTD), pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and the preliminary antitumour activity of the combination of lapatinib and sorafenib in patients with advanced refractory solid tumours.MethodsFour cohorts of at least three patients each received lapatinib once daily and sorafenib twice daily together on a continuous schedule. Doses of lapatinib and sorafenib were escalated based on dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) in the first treatment cycle following a traditional 3 + 3 design until the RPTD was reached. Additional patients were treated at the RPTD to characterise PK profiles of this combination and to investigate the potential interaction between lapatinib and sorafenib. Serum samples were collected at baseline and then prospectively every two cycles to assess changes in PD parameters. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00984425.FindingsThirty patients with advanced refractory solid tumours were enroled. DLTs were grade three fatigue and grade 3 atypical skin rash observed at dose levels 3 and 4, respectively. The higher dose level explored (lapatinib 1250 mg/day and sorafenib 400 mg twice daily) represented the RPTD of the combination. The most common drug-related adverse events were fatigue (68%), hypocalcemia (61%), diarrhoea (57%), lymphopaenia (54%), anorexia (50%), rash (50%), and hypophosphatemia (46%). PK analysis revealed no significant effect of sorafenib on the PK profile of lapatinib. Of the 27 assessable patients for clinical activity, one achieved a confirmed complete response, four (15%) had a partial response, and 12 (44%) achieved disease stabilisation. The disease control rate overall was 63%.InterpretationCombination treatment with lapatinib and sorafenib was feasible with promising clinical activity and without significant PK interactions. Long term tolerability seems to be challenging.     

A phase I dose-escalation and pharmacokinetic study of enzastaurin and erlotinib in patients with advanced solid tumors

Purpose  

Enzastaurin, an oral serine/threonine kinase inhibitor, targets the protein kinase C and AKT pathways with anti-tumor and anti-angiogenic effects. Erlotinib, an oral epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor, has activity in solid tumors. Based on the promising combination of EGFR inhibitors and anti-angiogenic agents, this phase I trial was initiated.