The family history of patients with primary or secondary antiphospholipid syndrome (APS)

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate familial history for evidence of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and autoimmune disease in rheumatology department patients with primary or secondary APS. METHODS: We retrospectively studied patients with APS and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) managed at the Rheumatology Department of the Bichat University Hospital, Paris, between 1987 and 1996. Data were collected by chart review and by a 1997 standardized telephone interview. RESULTS: We identified 108 patients with APS managed during the ten-year study period. According to classical classification criteria, 39 patients had primary antiphospholipid syndrome (PAPS) and 69 secondary antiphospholipid syndrome (SAPS). Family history data were obtained for 29 (74%) and 55 (80%) PAPS and SAPS patients. respectively (78% of the 108 patients). Twelve PAPS (41% and 19 SAPS (35%) patients had one or more relatives with evidence of at least one clinical feature of APS such as thrombosis or recurrent fetal loss; of these patients, seven in the PAPS (24%) and 11 in the SAPS (20%) group had two or more relatives with evidence of a clinical feature of APS. Three PAPS (10%) and 14 SAPS (25%) patients had one or more family members with an autoimmune disease. CONCLUSION: A positive family history for autoimmune disease and/or antiphospholipid syndrome is common in patients with PAPS or SAPS. This finding supports a genetic contribution to APS. The percentage of a positive family history for autoimmune disease tend to be higher in patients with SAPS than in those with PAPS.     

Is HLA class II susceptibility to primary antiphospholipid syndrome different from susceptibility to secondary antiphospholipid syndrome?

To assess whether the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) profile of patients presenting with primary antiphospholipid syndrome (PAPS) is different from that of patients with secondary antiphospholipid syndrome (SAPS), we studied 123 patients, 34 of whom presented PAPS and 35 SAPS due to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), 54 SLE patients without antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), and 166 controls. HLA-DRB1 and DQB1 alleles were typed using amplified DNA hybridized with sequence-specific primers. Compared to controls, PAPS patients exhibited a nonsignificantly increased frequency of DR53-associated alleles, and SAPS patients presented an increased frequency of HLA-DRB1*03 alleles (corrected P = 0.05). In addition, HLA-DRB1*03 alleles were over-represented in SAPS patients presenting anticardiolipin antibody (aCL) (Pc = 0.02), in SLE patients as a whole (Pc < 0.0001), and in SLE patients without APS (Pc = 0.02). The frequency of aCL among SLE patients presenting or not HLA-DRB1*03 alleles was closely similar. A trend to an increase in the frequency of the DQB1*0604 allele (14.3 versus 4.2%, P = 0.03) and of the DQB1*0302 allele (31.4 versus 12.7%, P = 0.01) was observed in SAPS. Taken together, these results indicate that the association of SAPS with HLA-DRB1*03 is due to the association with SLE and is not due to aCL, and suggest that the HLA class II profile of PAPS is different from that of SAPS.     

Increased level of tumor necrosis factor-�� in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome: marker not only of inflammation but also of the prothrombotic state

Connections between inflammation and thrombosis are intriguing, especially in a condition such as an antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), a disease characterized by immune-mediated thrombosis. Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) is a cytokine which shares proinflammatory and prothrombotic actions, while a soluble form of interlukin-2 receptor (sIL-2R) is considered a typical marker of (auto)immune inflammation with not known direct links to thrombosis. The differences in the pathogenesis of APS as compared to other autoimmune diseases might be connected with different serum levels of both mediators. To answer this question, we studied 147 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), 21 with SLE-like syndrome (SLE-LS), 20 with isolated APS (primary antiphospholipid syndrome, PAPS), and 32 healthy controls. Thirty-six patients from the SLE group fulfilled the updated APS criteria (secondary APS, SAPS). In comparison to healthy subjects, TNF-α concentration was increased in all patients, while sIL-2R rose significantly in the SLE group only. APS (both SAPS and PAPS) was characterized by the highest levels of TNF-α. Moreover, patients with lupus anticoagulant or elevated levels of IgG anticardiolipin or IgG anti-β₂-glycoprotein I antibodies had higher TNF-α levels than patients without the presence of any type of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). In conclusion, the presence of aPL is associated with higher TNF-α level, whereas increased level of sIL-2R is rather connected with definite SLE where inflammatory processes prevail. It might be hypothesized that TNF-α plays a major role in pathogenesis of APS thrombotic phenomena.     

Classification of an intermediate group of patients with antiphospholipid syndrome and lupus-like disease: primary or secondary antiphospholipid syndrome?

OBJECTIVE: (1) To classify an intermediate group of patients (IntAPS) with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and lupus-like disease either as primary (PAPS) or secondary APS (SAPS) and to discuss 2 different classifications. (2) To compare patients of a division of rheumatology with either PAPS or SAPS. METHODS: Patients with APS and patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) followed at the Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital Bichat, Paris, from 1987 to 1996 were analyzed. A chart review and a standardized telephone interview in 1997 completed the data of this study. RESULTS: (1) We found a total of 108 patients with APS: 22 with PAPS, 69 with SAPS, and 17 with IntAPS. The group of IntAPS did not differ from PAPS in any clinical or laboratory signs with the exception of antibodies to dsDNA and to extractable nuclear antigen (ENA). Between IntAPS and SAPS, there were several significant differences in clinical signs of SLE (malar rash, discoid rash, arthralgia) and in laboratory values (leukocytopenia). (2) Comparison of PAPS and SAPS showed statistically significant differences for positive Coombs' test, leukocytopenia, lymphocytopenia, antinuclear antibodies, antibodies to dsDNA and to ENA, and hypocomplementemia. CONCLUSION: The mainstay of the diagnosis of APS is the clinical event of thrombosis or miscarriage in the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies. Less important are laboratory values, which may help to differentiate PAPS from SAPS in order to initiate adequate therapy (e.g., anticoagulation in the first and additional corticosteroids in the second). Patients with IntAPS are more likely to be integrated into the group of PAPS than in the group of SAPS; therefore, special exclusion criteria for PAPS are not appropriate.     

Influence of antiphospholipid antibody levels and type on thrombotic manifestations: results from the Serbian National Cohort Study

Repeated thromboses are the most frequent clinical manifestation of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) in the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). The objective of this study was to observe the prevalence and localization of thrombosis, and to investigate the importance of aPL type and level for thrombosis-related events in patients diagnosed with APS. These are the first results of patients enrolled in Serbian National Cohort Study which comprises 256 patients: 162 with primary antiphospholipid syndrome (PAPS) and 94 with APS associated with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). aPL analysis included detection of aCL (IgG/IgM), β(2)GPI, and lupus anticoagulant. Thrombosis was diagnosed in 119 (46.5%) patients, with higher prevalence in PAPS compared with SLE patients (51.2% and 38.3%, respectively, p = 0.045). There was similar prevalence of arterial thrombosis in PAPS and SLE groups (34.6% and 34%, respectively, p = 0.932) although venous thrombosis was more frequent in PAPS (25.9% and 8.5%, respectively, p = 0.001). Thrombosis was observed in 92 (55.8%) patients who had more than one type of antibody (category I), in 13 (41.9%) patients with category IIa, in 19 (46.3%) patients with category IIb, and in 73 (44.2%) patients with category IIc (p = 0.10). The patients with thrombosis were older than those without thrombosis (49.8 and 39.8 years, respectively, p = 0.001). Overall, older age was a risk factor for thrombosis. The prevalence of venous thrombosis was higher in the PAPS group, but with lower frequency than in literature data. Any aPL type and level is a risk factor for thrombosis.     

Increased circulating platelet–leucocyte complexes and platelet activation in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome, systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis

It is possible that platelet activation may play a pathogenic role in the increased risk of thrombosis associated with antiphospholipid antibodies (APA). In this study, levels of in vivo platelet activation were measured in 20 patients with primary antiphospholipid syndrome (PAPS) and 30 systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients (14 of whom had secondary APS) using sensitive flow cytometry. Soluble P-selectin levels were also assayed. Platelet CD63 expression was significantly higher in PAPS than normal controls (P = 0.007), as well as SLE patients with and without secondary APS (P = 0.03 and P = 0.002 respectively). PAC-1 binding was significantly higher in PAPS than the control group (P = 0.007) and SLE patients without APS (P = 0.015). Platelet-leucocyte complexes were significantly higher in SLE patients than both PAPS and the control group, and platelet-monocyte complexes were significantly increased in PAPS compared with the control group. (Platelet-leucocyte complexes were also significantly higher than controls in 10 rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients without APA). Soluble P-selectin levels were significantly higher in PAPS and SLE patients than the control group. Platelet CD62p expression, annexin V binding and platelet microparticle numbers were not increased in PAPS or SLE patients. We conclude that there is evidence of increased platelet activation in PAPS and SLE, and this is important to note as it may have potential therapeutic implications with respect to use of antiplatelet agents in these patients.     

The prevalence of antibodies to anionic phospholipids in patients with the primary antiphospholipid syndrome, systemic lupus erythematosus and their relatives and spouses

OBJECTIVES: Antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) have been associated with syndromes involving thrombosis, fetal loss and thrombocytopenia. Genetic and environmental conditions are among the factors attributed to the cause of autoimmune diseases such as the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The aim of this study was to determine whether these factors determine the prevalence of aPL. METHODS: Three groups of patients were tested for the presence of IgG, IgM and IgA anticardiolipin (aCL), antiphosphatidylinositol (aPI), antiphosphatidylglycerol (aPG) and antiphosphatidylserine (aPS) antibodies: (i) patients with primary APS (PAPS); (ii) patients with SLE and secondary APS; and (iii) patients with SLE without APS. First-degree relatives and spouses of patients with SLE/APS were also tested for circulating aPL. RESULTS: IgG aPL were particularly prevalent in patients with PAPS. IgG aPI and aCL were more prevalent in patients with PAPS than the IgM equivalents (P < 0.0001). Notably, none of the patients with PAPS had IgA aPL. A significantly higher number of relatives of patients with SLE/APS possessed IgG aPL than the normal controls. Except for aPG (P < 0.03), the prevalence of these antibodies in the relatives was not significantly different from patients with SLE/APS. The relatives also had significantly higher prevalence of IgG aPI, aPS and aCL antibodies than IgM aPL antibodies. In contrast, the prevalence of IgG aPL in the spouses was no different than in the healthy controls. CONCLUSIONS: Genetic factors, shared by patients and their relatives, seem to have some effect on the prevalence of aPL in the subjects studied, while environmental factors shared by spouses appear to have no influence.     

Cardiac dysfunction in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and antiphospholipid syndrome

OBJECTIVE: To comparatively assess the parameters of systolic and diastolic cardiac function in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). METHODS: Consecutive patients (n=74) who were free of cardiovascular symptoms were divided into four groups: (1) SLE (n=23); (2) SLE with antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL; n=18); (3) SLE with APS (n=20); and (4) primary antiphospholipid syndrome (PAPS; n=13). Pulsed, continuous, colour Doppler echocardiography, and M-mode and B-mode studies were performed. RESULTS: Left ventricular end diastolic and end systolic dimensions were higher in SLE as compared with patients with PAPS (p=0.022 and 0.022, respectively), with a trend towards a lower fractional shortening in SLE (p=0.07), suggesting systolic dysfunction. Parameters of diastolic function were more impaired in patients with APS, reflected by lower left ventricular and right ventricular E wave to A wave (E:A) ratios in patients with APS (groups 3, 4) compared with those without APS (groups 1, 2; 1.15 (0.40) v 1.49 (0.43), p=0.001 and 1.19 (0.31) v 1.49 (0.41), p=0.001, respectively) and a more prolonged left ventricular isovolumic relaxation time (IVRT; 94.2 (24.6) v 84.4 (17) ms, respectively, p=0.055). Patients with APS were older than those without APS (47.12 (14.86) v 34.29 (12.6), p=0.0001). Patients with SLE were younger than those with PAPS (38.19 (14.68) v 48.53 (13.97), p=0.023). CONCLUSION: Abnormal echocardiographic findings were detected frequently in asymptomatic patients with SLE or PAPS. Although patients with SLE were younger, left ventricular systolic function was more impaired in patients with SLE compared with those with PAPS, whereas left ventricular and right ventricular diastolic function, as reflected by IVRT and E:A ratios, were significantly more impaired in patients with APS.     

Value of IgA anticardiolipin and anti-beta2-glycoprotein I antibody testing in patients with pregnancy morbidity

OBJECTIVE: To study the prevalence of IgA antiphospholipid antibodies, particularly anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL) and anti-beta(2)-glycoprotein I (abeta(2)GPI), in a cohort of patients with pregnancy morbidity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Serum samples from four groups of patients were studied by an in house enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Group I: 28 patients with primary antiphospholipid syndrome (PAPS) (median age 32.5 years, range 25-34). Twelve patients had a history of thrombosis. All were positive for IgG/M aCL or lupus anticoagulant (LA), or both. Group II: 28 patients with unexplained pregnancy morbidity (median age 35 years, range 23-48). Seven had history of thrombosis. Nine patients were positive for IgG/M aCL. None from this group fulfilled Sapporo criteria for APS. Group III: 28 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) (median age 34 years, range 25-52). Eleven had a history of thrombosis. Twenty one patients had IgG/M aCL and/or LA, but only 19 fulfilled Sapporo criteria for APS. RESULTS: IgA aCL were found in 12, 6, and 14 patients from the groups with PAPS, unexplained pregnancy morbidity, and SLE, respectively. Most patients had these antibodies together with IgG/IgM aCL. Three patients from the group with unexplained pregnancy morbidity and two with SLE had IgA aCL alone. IgA abeta(2)GPI was present in one patient from each group. All IgA abeta(2)GPI were present together with IgG and/or IgM abeta(2)GPI. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of IgA aCL is high in patients with pregnancy morbidity, although IgA aCL are usually present together with IgG and/or IgM aCL. IgA abeta(2)GPI are not useful in identifying additional women with APS and pregnancy morbidity.     

Distinct antibody profile: a clue to primary antiphospholipid syndrome evolving into systemic lupus erythematosus?

We have performed a retrospective study to determine if patients with antiphospholipid syndrome that developed systemic lupus erythematosus (APS/SLE) had distinct clinical and/or serological features. All 80 primary APS (PAPS) patients followed up at our APS unit were included in the study and divided into two groups: 14 APS/SLE and 66 PAPS. Prior or at onset of lupus manifestations, six patients were uniformly negative for lupus and Sjögren autoantibodies, and the other eight patients had persistent positive. In the first year after diagnosis of SLE, three patients remained with negative antibodies, the other seven patients maintained the same antibodies, and four patients developed other antibodies. APS/SLE group had a significant lower mean age at PAPS diagnosis (26.0?±?8.0 vs. 34.2?±?11.9 years, p?=?0.03) and a longer disease duration (14.0?±?7.0 vs. 6.0?±?5.0 years, p?<?0.0001). The mean time for PAPS to develop SLE was 5.2?±?4.3 years. The typical clinical and laboratorial findings of APS did not discriminate both groups of patients. At lupus onset, antinuclear antibodies were more frequently observed in those who evolved to SLE (100 vs. 51.5 %, p?=?0.0005). Anti-double-stranded DNA (dsDNA), anti-ribosomal P, anti-Ro/SS-A, anti-La/SS-B, and anti-U1RNP antibodies were exclusively found in the APS/SLE patients, whereas anti-Smith (Sm) antibodies were not detected in both groups. The detection of a distinct subgroup of lupus-associated autoantibody in PAPS patients seems to be a hint to overt SLE disease, particularly in those patients with young age at diagnosis.     

Autoantibodies against C-reactive protein: clinical associations in systemic lupus erythematosus and primary antiphospholipid syndrome

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prevalence of anti-C-reactive protein (CRP) autoantibodies in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and non-SLE patients with persistent antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) and their association with clinical manifestations. METHODS: Sera of 137 patients with SLE, 127 with persistent aPL and 30 with idiopathic venous thromboembolic disease, were assayed for the presence of anti-CRP reactivity by ELISA. Associations of anti-CRP reactivity with clinical features, with other autoantibodies, and with serum concentrations of C3 and CRP were assessed. RESULTS: Antibodies against CRP were seen in 51% (n = 137) of patients with SLE and in 54% (n = 127) of patients with aPL. SLE patients with anti-CRP antibodies showed increased frequencies of anti-dsDNA and aPL antibodies compared to those without anti-CRP (52% vs 26% and 68% vs 31%, respectively). Mean serum C3 levels were lower in the subgroup of patients with SLE positive for anti-CRP antibodies (79 +/- 25 vs 92 +/- 25 mg/dl; p = 0.004 ) and mean serum CRP levels were significantly higher (13 +/- 17 vs 5 +/- 8 mg/l; p = 0.01 ). The frequency of nephritis was higher in SLE patients with anti-CRP antibodies, than in those without (27% vs 13%; p = 0.058). In patients with clinical and serological evidence of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) the frequency of anti-CRP antibodies was significantly higher than in asymptomatic aPL carriers, in both SLE patients [85% (23 of 27) vs 59% (19 of 32); p = 0.021] and non-SLE patients [76% (38 of 50) vs 19% (9 of 47); p < 0.001]. Among patients with APS with or without SLE, 26 had arterial events, 31 had venous events, 6 had combined arterial and venous events, and 14 had fetal loss. Mean titers of IgG anti-CRP (29 +/- 21, 30 +/- 19, 60 +/- 37, and 26 +/- 12 AU/ml) and frequencies of anti-CRP antibodies (88%, 71%, 50%, and 71%) in these subgroups of patients were comparable. CONCLUSION: We confirmed the high prevalence of anti-CRP autoantibodies both in patients with SLE and in non-SLE and aPL-positive patients. We observed that the presence of these antibodies was associated with lupus nephritis and with clinical features of the APS in patients with lupus and non-lupus patients.     

Evolution of cardiac dysfunction in patients with antiphospholipid antibodies and/or antiphospholipid syndrome: A 10-year follow-up study

Objectives

To describe the evolution of valve involvement and myocardial dysfunction over time in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) with or without antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) and/or antiphospholipid syndrome (APS).

Methods

From an initial cohort of 150 patients assessed by transthoracic echocardiography 10 years ago, 17 patients with primary APS (PAPS), 23 with SLE-associated APS (SLE/APS), 19 with SLE positive for aPL without APS, and 23 with SLE negative for aPL were re-evaluated in the present echocardiography study.

Results

Valvulopathy was detected in 65% of PAPS and 62% of SLE patients with or without aPL. Disease duration [odds ratio (OR), 1.63; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.13–2.36; p = 0.009 for every 5 years of increase] and presence of SLE/APS (OR, 3.51; 95% CI, 1.27–9.67; p = 0.015) were the only factors associated with the progression of valvular disease in univariate and multivariate analyses. Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction similarly progressed over time, with deceleration time (DT) and isovolumic relaxation time (IVRT) being equally prolonged in each of the four groups (p < 0.05). Right ventricular DT was significantly prolonged in each of the three SLE patient groups (p < 0.001), whereas IVRT increased only in SLE/APS patients (p = 0.040).

Conclusions

Among patients with APS and SLE (with or without aPL), SLE/APS and disease duration were independent factors for valvular disease progression in the present 10-year follow-up echocardiography study. Anticoagulation did not arrest valvular disease progression. Ventricular diastolic dysfunction, primarily of the left ventricle, also progressed over the 10-year period.     

Clinical spectrum of males with primary antiphospholipid syndrome and systemic lupus erythematosus: a comparative study of 73 patients

The objective of this study was to compare the clinical findings, laboratory data, functional outcome and chronic damage in male patients with primary antiphospholipid syndrome (PAPS) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). We studied 29 male patients with PAPS and 44 with SLE. Clinical findings, laboratory data, lupus damage index (SLICC/ACR DI), and functional outcome in PAPS, were analysed in each group. The mean age at diagnosis was 29.8 +/- 10.4 years in patients with PAPS and 26 +/- 10.1 years in SLE patients. The duration of disease was 4.5 +/- 2.6 versus 5.2 +/- 3.8 years in patients with PAPS and SLE, respectively (P = NS). In patients with PAPS the most frequent clinical manifestations were venous thrombosis, thrombocytopenia, and pulmonary thromboembolism. Patients with SLE had joint, skin and renal involvement more frequently than those with PAPS (P = 0.0001). All PAPS patients had anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL), and 14 patients (48%) had lupus anticoagulant (LA). All SLE patients had antinuclear antibodies (ANAs). Anti-dsDNA antibodies were positive in 39% of SLE patients. Five patients died: one with 'catastrophic' APS and four with SLE. SLICC/ACR-DI score in SLE patients was 1.9 (SD = 1). In PAPS patients poor functional outcome was due to myocardial infarction, pulmonary thromboembolism, stroke and mesenteric thrombosis. Lupus nephritis was the principal organ damage in SLE. In conclusion, in male patients with PAPS and SLE, the clinical manifestations were significantly different. Arterial thrombosis was the major cause of functional impairment and permanent organ damage in PAPS. Renal involvement was the major cause of chronic damage in SLE.     

Pulmonary dysfunction in systemic lupus erythematosus and anti-phospholipid syndrome patients

OBJECTIVE: To assess and compare parameters of pulmonary function in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and anti-phospholipid syndrome (APS) patients. METHODS: Consecutive patients (n = 74) who were free of respiratory symptoms were divided into four groups: 1) SLE (n = 23); 2) SLE with anti-phospholipid antibodies (aPL) (n = 18); 3) SLE with APS (n = 20); and 4) primary APS (PAPS) (n = 13). Pulmonary function testing, single breath diffusion capacity of carbon monoxide (DLCO/SB) and echocardiography studies were performed. Induced sputum cytology was analysed. RESULTS: Forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), and DLCO were significantly reduced in SLE compared to PAPS patients (p = 0.039; p = 0.017; p = 0.029, respectively). Elevated pulmonary arterial pressure was observed in two patients with SLE and aPL and in two with SLE and APS. Lymphocyte and eosinophil counts in induced sputum showed no significant differences; however, a trend towards lower CD4 counts in SLE vs. PAPS was noted (p = 0.086), while in patients with both SLE and APS, a low CD4/CD8 ratio was seen. Patients with APS were older than patients without APS (47.12+/-14.86 vs. 34.29+/-12.6, p = 0.0001), while SLE patients were younger than PAPS patients (38.19+/-14.68 vs. 48.53+/-13.97, p = 0.023). CONCLUSION: Abnormal pulmonary functions tests were detected frequently in asymptomatic patients with SLE or PAPS. Although SLE patients were younger, pulmonary function was significantly more impaired in SLE as compared to PAPS patients.     

Preclinical vascular disease in systemic lupus erythematosus and primary antiphospholipid syndrome

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of preclinical vascular disease and associated risk factors in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) or primary antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). METHODS: We consecutively studied 70 SLE patients and 25 primary APS patients without clinical coronary artery disease. The control group included 40 healthy women. Carotid ultrasound was performed and the intima-media wall thickness (IMT) and presence of plaque was investigated in all patients and controls. Traditional vascular risk factors and SLE-disease and treatment related factors were also analysed. RESULTS: SLE patients had a higher prevalence of traditional atherosclerosis risk factors: hypertension (P<0.005) and dyslipidaemia (P<0.05) and higher levels of total cholesterol (P = 0.03), triglycerides (P = 0.004) and apolipoprotein B (P = 0.04). The prevalence of carotid plaque was higher and appeared earlier in SLE patients than in the primary APS patients or controls (P<0.001). The IMT was similar in the three groups. SLE patients with secondary APS had a higher prevalence of carotid plaque than patients with primary APS (37.5% vs 8%, P = 0.03). The presence of plaque in SLE patients was associated with a higher SLICC score (2.40 +/- 1.78 vs 1.02 +/- 1.18, P = 0.002), higher ECLAM score (3.10 +/- 2.32 vs 1.84 +/- 1.59, P = 0.02) and older age (47.3 +/- 8.44 vs 37.38 +/- 11.28, P = 0.003) at the time of carotid ultrasound study. CONCLUSION: Plaque prevalence in patients with primary APS is similar to that of controls and inferior to that of SLE patients with secondary APS. SLE patients have a high prevalence of early carotid atherosclerosis that is associated with cumulative disease damage and disease activity.     

Prevalence and clinical significance of antiprothrombin antibodies in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus or with primary antiphospholipid syndrome

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Antibodies to prothrombin (aII) have been identified in patients with antiphospholipid antibodies, but their clinical significance is not well known. The aim of our study was to investigate their prevalence and association with clinical manifestations of the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) in patients with primary APS or with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). DESIGN AND METHODS: A series of 177 patients with autoimmune diseases was studied: 70 with primary APS and 107 with systemic lupus erythematosus. A control group of 87 healthy volunteers were included in the study. aII were investigated in sera by an ELISA, using human prothrombin as antigen fixed in irradiated polystyrene plates. RESULTS: aII prevalence in patients with autoimmune disease was 47% (57% and 40% in patients with primary APS or with SLE, respectively) significantly higher than in controls (5%) (p<0.0001). In the whole series, thrombotic events were more prevalent in patients with aII (45% vs 28%; p=0.02). Moreover, aII was found to be an independent risk factor for arterial thrombosis (OR=2.4; p=0. 04). Similarly, in patients with SLE, aII were associated with both arterial and venous thrombosis (35% vs 14%; p=0.01), although only IgG-aII (OR=3.7; p=0.01) had an independent value as risk factor for thrombosis. However, a relationship between aII and thrombosis was not found in primary APS. aII were associated with thrombocytopenia only in patients with primary APS (OR=6.7; p=0.007). INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: aII seem to be a serological marker of thrombosis in autoimmune diseases, mainly in SLE patients and/or in the arterial territory.     

Comparison of renal disease severity and outcome in patients with primary antiphospholipid syndrome, antiphospholipid syndrome secondary to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and SLE alone

OBJECTIVE: To ascertain the clinical presentation, histopathology and outcome of renal involvement in patients with primary antiphospholipid syndrome (PAPS), antiphospholipid syndrome secondary to systemic lupus erythematosus (SAPS) and systemic lupus erythematosus alone. METHOD: A retrospective analysis was undertaken of 20 patients with PAPS, 25 patients with SAPS and 275 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus to ascertain the frequency and pattern of renal involvement. RESULTS: Renal involvement was found most frequently in patients with SAPS, in whom it occurred in 68% of patients. Renal disease was equally common in patients with PAPS and systemic lupus erythematosus alone where it was seen in 30% of patients. Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus most frequently presented with nephrotic syndrome due to glomerulonephritis, whereas those with PAPS and SAPS were more likely to present with hypertension and reduced glomerular filtration rate. No patients with PAPS developed end-stage renal failure compared with 5.9% of patients with SAPS and 16.9% of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus alone; 23.5% of patients with SAPS died compared with 15.7% of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus alone and no patients with PAPS. CONCLUSION: Renal involvement is a major feature of both PAPS and SAPS, where renal thrombosis frequently leads to reduced glomerular filtration rate and hypertension. One-third of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus alone develop glomerulonephritis leading to renal disease which most commonly presents with nephrotic syndrome. Patients with PAPS were less likely to develop end-stage renal failure or die during the follow-up period.     

Antibodies against the N-terminal domain of annexin A2 in antiphospholipid syndrome

Annexin A2 (ANXA2, an endothelial cell receptor for plasminogen and tissue plasminogen activator) has been identified as a new autoantigen in antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). The aim of the present study was to evaluate the presence of antibodies against the N-terminal domain of annexin A2 (ANXA2) in primary APS (PAPS). By using a synthetic peptide corresponding to the 31N-terminal amino acids of ANXA2 (ANXA2(N31)) as an antigen, we performed an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to measure anti-ANXA2(N31) IgG and IgM antibodies in the serum of PAPS patients (n=19), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients (n=50) and healthy blood donors (n=106). We did not find any statistically differences between the three groups in terms of IgG and IgM anti-ANXA2(N31) titres. Elevated IgG anti-ANXA2(N31) titres were not observed in the serum of PAPS or SLE patients who had previously tested positive for anti-ANXA2 antibodies. Thus, the ANXA2 N-terminal domain does not appear to be the target antigen for anti-ANXA2 antibodies in APS.     

Thrombin generation in antiphospholipid syndrome

Our objective was to study acquired Activated Protein C (APC) resistance in patients with antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) using a thrombin generation based assay. We compared patients with and without lupus (systemic lupus erythematosus, SLE). A parameter summarizing APC inhibition of thrombin generation with increasing APC concentrations (IC(50)-APC) was increased in all patient groups compared to controls: median values were 15.3 (interquartile range, IQR, 9.7 to 34.0) in patients with primary antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), 27.3 (IQR 23.5 to 43.5) in patients with SLE without APS, 64.1 (IQR 25.9 to 65.0) in patients with SLE/APS compared to 10.4 [IQR 8.5 to 15.8] in controls, respectively p = 0.003, p = 0.0001 and p = 0.0001. In conclusion, patients with SLE and primary APS displayed a hypercoagulable state characterized by APC resistance.     

Thrombotic risk in patients submitted to splenectomy for systemic lupus erythematosus and antiphospholipid antibody syndrome-related thrombocytopenia

Background: Splenectomy has been performed to treat refractory autoimmune thrombocytopenia. However, some reports have suggested that an increased risk of thrombosis could be present in splenectomized patients. This study aims to evaluate the possibility of an increased risk of thrombosis after splenectomy in patients with systemic lupus and antiphospholipid syndrome. Methods: Thrombotic-related events in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and/or primary antiphospholipid syndrome (PAPS), before and after splenectomy for severe thrombocytopenia, were compared. Clinical data, laboratory investigations, and anticoagulation or antiaggregation treatment data were collected from the notes of outpatients attending three European centers. Results: Twenty patients who had had a splenectomy were identified: eight with SLE, five with PAPS, and seven with SLE and APS. The mean time between diagnosis and splenectomy was 3.1 years and mean follow-up was 6.5 years. There were no differences in anticardiolipin antibody titers, lupus anticoagulant, anti-DNA or anti-nuclear antibodies before and after surgery. The incidence of venous events before and after splenectomy was not significantly different. There was a trend towards an increase in the total number of arterial events post-splenectomy. In aCL-positive patients, and in the pre-splenectomy period, the total number of miscarriages was higher (p=0.017), as was the number of patients who had had a miscarriage (p=0.025). Conclusions: The total risk of thrombosis in patients with PAPS and SLE was not increased after splenectomy, but there was a trend towards an increase in the number of arterial events. Splenectomy induced long-term remission of thrombocytopenia (partial or complete) in all patients.