Déterminants socio-géographiques de la prise en charge des cancers en France – Exemple des cancers colorectaux incidents entre 1997 et 2004 dans le département du Calvados

BackgroundNumerous studies have underlined an important deprivation gap in survival in all industrialized countries, prognosis being constantly poorer for the most deprived patients. Beside clinical factors, the explanation of this gap in survival could be partly explained by the influence of socio-geographical environment on cancer care management. The aim of this retrospective population-based study was to investigate the influence of socio-geographical determinants on access to a reference care centre.MethodsThe study population included all colorectal cancer patients with surgical treatment diagnosed between 1/01/1997 and 31/12/2004 in Calvados (n = 2318). Individual clinical data were supplied by the Calvados registry of the gastrointestinal tumors. Beside geographical variables (distance to nearest cancer center), aggregate socioeconomic data were derived from the last exhaustive census organized by the national statistics institute (INSEE) in 1999. The Townsend deprivation index was used for this study. Due to the hierarchical structure of such variables, a multilevel logistic model was used (Level 1: Patients; Level 2: IRIS2000).ResultsAfter adjustment on the individual variables, most remote patients were less frequently treated in a reference care center than those who were living near a reference care center (Odds Ratio adjust = 0.20 [0.15–0.28], p-trend < 0.001). Patients living in an IRIS2000 with high medical density were more likely to receive surgical treatment in a reference care centre (p-trend = 0.05). Townsend Deprivation index was not associated with access to reference care center.ConclusionAccess to a reference care center was strongly determined by the distance to nearest care center. Dissemination of clinical guidelines and improvement in treatment in non-reference care centers are crucial in ensuring equality in health care.     

Perception du malade chronique chez les professionnels de santé : une évolution marquée par les indicateurs d’évaluation de programmes d’éducation thérapeutique du patient entre 2011 et 2017 au CHU de Clermont-Ferrand,France

BackgroundSince 2010, in France, Therapeutic Patient Education (TPE) programs have applied to the Regional Health Agency (RHA) for authorization. Every four years, these programs are mandatorily re-evaluated, and the assessment allows for change in the program management criteria. In our hospital, we studied the evolution of the Therapeutic Patient Education (TPE) appraisal benchmarks, otherwise known as “indicators”, in the 17 programs having been authorized and renewed at least once by the RHA.MethodThe TPE program appraisal benchmarks are classified in terms of structure, process and outcomes; program activity itself as well as pedagogic, psychosocial and bioclinical indicators are taken into consideration. We wished to determine the extent to which these indicators were addressed, applied and renewed or created during renewal of the TPE programs. Statistical tests were carried out in order to compare changes in the number of benchmarks in each category before and after the renewal process.ResultsDuring the first authorization, there existed 533 appraisal benchmarks, while they numbered 550 for the second. As for “before-and-after” changes, they consisted in a reduced number of outcome indicators (43.7% to 35.1%), whereas process indicators increased (36.8% to 43.1%) (P = 0.0141). In comparison to the category pertaining to pedagogic, psychosocial and bioclinical indicators, the most widely registered indicator category (55.5%) and the most frequently collected indicator category involved the program activity itself (54.7%) (P < 0.0001), which increased pronouncedly during renewal periods (67.6%) (P = 0.0002). Conversely, the pedagogic and psychosocial indicators were little if at all collected. As regards the latter, there was nevertheless a considerable increase in indicators related to skills and changes favoring health-promoting behaviours. Strictly bioclinical indicators have been largely supplanted by those having to do with the disease evolution, its impact and risk management.ConclusionThe major role assigned to process and structure indicators reflects the fact that they are predominantly structured by RHA requests. Even if this initial study necessitates further research, it highlights a change in the design of educational and psychosocial assessments among caregivers, a change likely to reflect their interest in how patients go about managing their illnesses, (more or less healthy) lifestyles and daily lives.     

Comparaison des comités d’éthique de France et du Québec en regard de l’incapacité à consentir à la recherche

BackgroundFrench and Quebec legislation allow the inclusion of decisionally-incompetent subjects in research, provided certain conditions are met. In both jurisdictions, ethics committees are charged with ensuring that research protocols meet these conditions. We investigated committee members’ knowledge and opinions regarding substitute consent for research purposes.MethodsTwo consecutive postal surveys were conducted among all members of ethics committees from France and Quebec. Knowledge and opinions about proxy consent were measured with clinical vignettes describing hypothetical situations involving incapable adults. For each vignette, respondents were asked to either identify the person legally authorized to consent or choose the substitute decision-maker whom they considered best suited to do so.ResultsKnowledge of the legislation governing substitute consent was poor in both samples, especially in situations involving an incompetent person who did not have a legal representative. Knowledge was worse among French ethics committee members (p < 0.001). In hypothetical clinical studies that involved no risk to the subject's health, 59% of respondents favored consent from a close relative. As the risk increased, the proportion gradually decreased to 14.2%, while the proportion against soliciting the cognitively impaired older adult tended to increase (from 5.8 to 31.2%). These trends were observed in both samples.ConclusionThese findings underscore the need to better educate ethics committee members about legislation regarding prospective subjects who lack decisional capacity. Such efforts could improve both knowledge of and compliance with legal provisions that enable or restrict the participation of cognitively-impaired patients in research projects. Moreover, study findings provide some support for enlarging the category of persons who are authorized to consent to low-risk research on behalf of incapacitated adults who lack legal representation.