Transplantation with pancreas after living donor kidney vs. living donor kidney alone in type 1 diabetes mellitus recipients*

Sampaio MS, Poommipanit N, Cho YW, Shah T, Bunnapradist S. Transplantation with pancreas after living donor kidney vs. living donor kidney alone in type 1 diabetes mellitus recipients.
Clin Transplant 2010: 24: 812–820. © 2009 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract: Living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) in type 1 diabetic recipients (T1DM) may be followed by a pancreas after living donor kidney (PALK). The impact of the PALK is largely unknown. Adult T1DM living donor kidney recipients (1997–2007) listed for pancreas transplantation were divided into those who subsequently received pancreas transplantation and those who did not (living donor kidney transplant alone [LDKA]). Outcomes were compared. A sub‐analysis was performed in recipients with at least one yr of kidney graft survival and limiting PALK to those who underwent pancreas transplantation in the first year. Of 4554 recipients, 23% received PALK. PALK had more favorable baseline characteristics. At the end of eight yr, we found significantly superior patient (85% vs. 75%) and kidney graft survival (75% vs. 62%) in PALK group. The adjusted hazard ratios of PALK (LDKA as reference) were 0.65 (95%CI: 0.52–0.81) for death and 0.63 (0.54–0.76) for renal graft loss. In sub‐group analysis, there was a trend toward decreased death in PALK (HR = 0.78: 0.57–1.07). In conclusion, only 23% of those wait‐listed received a pancreas with patient and kidney survival superior to LDKA. Pancreas transplant in the first year after kidney transplant was associated with a trend toward better long‐term patient survival.     

Surgical complications and renal function after kidney alone or simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation: a matched comparative study.

BACKGROUND: In selected type 1 diabetic (T1DM) patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPKT) offers higher long-term graft and patient survival, but also higher initial morbidity and mortality than cadaveric kidney transplantation alone (CKTA). The development of new immunosuppressive regimens and surgical approach has improved this initial outcome, but little is known about their effect on short-term renal function and surgical complications related to the renal graft. METHODS: We analysed retrospectively the short-term follow-up of 45 T1DM patients consecutively transplanted during 42 months (20 SPKT and 25 CKTA) in order to compare short-term (6 months) renal allograft function and surgical complications related to the renal allograft in both groups. RESULTS: There were no differences in donor characteristics. SPKT recipients had a significantly shorter time on dialysis and cold ischaemia time, with a higher number of HLA mismatches. There was no difference in acute rejection incidence, but delayed kidney graft function was less frequent in SPKT (5% vs 32%; P<0.05). Plasma creatinine level at discharge and 6 months was significantly lower in SPKT (1.1+/-0.3 vs 1.6+/-0.7; P<0.005 and 1.1+/-0.3 vs 1.5+/-0.6; P<0.05, respectively). There were no differences in surgical renal complications (haemorrhage, thrombosis or arterial stenosis, ureter leaks or stricture, lymphoceles or dehiscences). Two SPKT patients needed reintervention on the renal allograft and only one CKTA patient. CONCLUSIONS: In the modern transplant era, SPKT in ESRD diabetic patients, offers a slightly better short-term kidney allograft function without significant increase in surgical morbidity, compared with CKTA.     

The case for pancreas after kidney transplantation

Abstract:  Pancreas after kidney (PAK) transplantation has historically demonstrated inferior pancreas allograft survival compared to simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK) transplantation. Under our current immunosuppression protocol, we have noted excellent outcomes and rare immunological graft loss. The goal of this study was to compare pancreas allograft survival in PAK and SPK recipients using this regimen. This was a single center retrospective review of all SPK and PAK transplants performed between January 2003 and November 2007. All transplants were performed with systemic venous drainage and enteric exocrine drainage. Immunosuppression included induction with rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (thymoglobulin), early steroid withdrawal, and maintenance with tacrolimus and sirolimus or mycophenolate mofetil. Study end points included graft and patient survival and immunosuppression related complications. Transplants included PAK 61 (30%) and SPK 142 (70%). One-yr patient survival was PAK 98% and SPK 95% (p = 0.44) and pancreas graft survival was PAK 95% and SPK 90% (p = 0.28). Acute cellular rejection was uncommon with 2% requiring treatment in each group. Survival for PAK using thymoglobulin induction, early steroid withdrawal and tacrolimus-based immunosuppression is at least comparable to SPK and should be pursued in the recipient with a potential living donor.     

Renal outcomes of simultaneous liver–kidney transplantation compared to liver transplant alone for candidates with renal dysfunction

It is unclear whether a concomitant kidney transplant grants survival benefit to liver transplant (LT) candidates with renal dysfunction (RD). We retrospectively studied LT candidates without RD (n = 714) and LT candidates with RD who underwent either liver transplant alone (RD‐LTA; n = 103) or simultaneous liver–kidney transplant (RD‐SLKT; n = 68). RD was defined as renal replacement therapy (RRT) requirement or modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD)–glomerular filtration rate (GFR) <25 mL/min/1.73 m². RD‐LTAs had worse one‐yr post‐transplant survival compared to RD‐SLKTs (79.6% vs. 91.2%, p = 0.05). However, RD‐LTA recipients more often had hepatitis C (60.2% vs. 41.2%, p = 0.004) and more severe liver disease (MELD 37.9 ± 8.1 vs. 32.7 ± 9.1, p = 0.0001). Twenty RD‐LTA recipients died in the first post‐transplant year. Evaluation of the cause and timing of death relative to native renal recovery revealed that only four RD‐LTA recipients might have derived survival benefit from RD‐SLKT. Overall, 87% of RD‐LTA patients recovered renal function within one month of transplant. One yr after RD‐LTA or RD‐SLKT, serum creatinine (1.5 ± 1.2 mg/dL vs. 1.4 ± 0.5 mg/dL, p = 0.63) and prevalence of stage 4 or 5 chronic kidney disease (CKD; 5.9% vs. 6.8%, p = 0.11) were comparable. Our series provides little evidence that RD‐SLKT would have yielded substantial short‐term survival benefit to RD‐LTA recipients.     

Long-term renal allograft outcome after simultaneous kidney and pancreas transplantation.

BACKGROUND: In selected young patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus and end-stage renal failure, simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK) transplantation is the treatment of choice. We conducted a retrospective, case-controlled study to compare the function, survival and pathology of renal allografts after SPK and kidney-alone (KA) transplantations. METHODS: We studied 26 consecutive SPK patients and 67 KA controls matched for time of transplantation. Renal function was assessed by routine evaluation of serum creatinine and its course by the 1/serum creatinine vs time curve. Histologic evaluation of early biopsies (0-3 months post-transplantation, n=63), intermediate biopsies (3 months-1 year, n=75) and late biopsies (after 1 year, n=35) were performed by two independent reviewers. RESULTS: SPK and KA recipients differed significantly with regard to donor and recipient age, time on the waiting list, HLA sensitization, renal cold ischaemia time (CIT) and the incidence of delayed graft function. Acute rejection was more frequent after SPK than KA (54 vs 27%; P=0.01), despite higher trough levels of calcineurin inhibitors. After SPK and KA, actuarial patient and renal allograft survival and renal function were comparable at 1 and 4 years. Severe chronic lesions, especially vascular lesions, and calcineurin-inhibitor nephrotoxicity were more frequent in intermediate and late biopsies in the SPK group. CONCLUSIONS: We confirmed that patient and graft survival is comparable between SPK and KA recipients. Despite the use of optimal organs and shorter CIT in SPK, renal graft function was not different in the two groups. Histologic chronic lesions were more severe in SPK than in KA recipients. This might be caused by acute rejection episodes or be due to more severe nephrotoxicity after SPK, because of higher doses of calcineurin inhibitors, or higher sensitivity to calcineurin-inhibitor nephrotoxicity.     

Risk analysis for deterioration of renal function after pancreas alone transplant

The risk of progression to renal replacement after pancreas transplant alone (PTA) is a concern in patients with pre-transplant estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 70 mL/min/1.73 m(2). This is a retrospective, single-center risk analysis of potential factors affecting renal function after PTA. Twenty-four patients, transplanted over a three-yr period, with functioning pancreatic grafts at the study's end point were included. High tacrolimus levels (> 12 mg/dL) at six months post-transplant was the only independent risk factor identifying a substantial decline in native renal function by Cox regression analysis (HR = 14.300, CI = 1.271-160.907, p = 0.031). The presence of severe pre-transplant proteinuria (urine Pr/Cr ≥ 100 mg/mmol) marginally failed to reach significance (p = 0.056). Low eGFR levels alone (≤ 45 and ≤ 40 mL/min/1.73 m(2)) at the time of transplant did not correlate with substantial decline in renal function. Our data suggest that PTA is a justifiable therapy for patients with hypoglycemia unawareness or other life-threatening diabetic complications, even in those with borderline renal function, provided that they do not suffer from severe proteinuria and appropriate monitoring and tailoring of immunosuppression is ensured.     

Simultaneous pancreas–kidney transplantation in type 1 diabetes

The outcome of simultaneous pancreas–kidney (SPK) transplantation in type 1 diabetes has dramatically improved in recent years because of optimized surgical techniques and new immunosuppressive drug regimens. Normoglycemia is followed by stabilization or even regression of diabetic lesions, i.e., of heart and kidneys. However, these effects are only visible after more than five yr of normoglycemia (achieved by a functioning allograft). This is also a likely explanation for the conflicting results of studies that investigated patient or kidney graft survival in SPK transplantation compared to kidney transplantation alone. Most studies had too short follow-up periods, i.e., less than five yr, to compare effectively different transplant strategies in patients with type 1 diabetes and therefore failed to discover a survival benefit in favor of simultaneously transplanted patients. Recent data now indicate that, with a longer follow-up, there is an increasing survival benefit for simultaneously transplanted patients compared to patients who received a single kidney transplant. This is paralleled by the comparison of simultaneously transplanted patients to patients who received a single kidney transplant from a living donor. A survival benefit for the combined procedure was here visible after  10 yr of follow-up. We give a short overview on SPK transplantation, with a focus on the effects of this procedure on diabetic complications as well as patient and kidney graft survival.     

Increased morbidity and mortality in patients with diabetes mellitus after kidney transplantation as compared with non-diabetic patients.

The results of renal transplantation in patients with juvenile-onset diabetes mellitus were compared to those of a well-matched control group of non-diabetic patients. All transplantations were performed between 1977 and 1988. In the diabetic group hypertension (72 versus 41%), coronary artery disease (17 versus 0%), and peripheral vascular disease (19 versus 0%) had been significantly more frequent pretransplantation. Fewer diabetic patients had previously been treated with dialysis therapy (69 versus 97%). Graft function measured by creatinine clearance after 1 year follow-up, and incidence of proteinuria were not significantly different. The overall graft survival was significantly worse in the diabetic group compared to the control group: 42 versus 69% after 60 months and 21 versus 62% after 90 months. This was caused by a significantly worse patient survival in the diabetic group after 105 months: 28 versus 78% in the control group. The graft survival following exclusion of the patients who died with a functioning graft did not differ significantly between the groups after 60 and 90 months: 62 and 31% in the diabetic group and 69 and 62% in the control group. The existence of any vascular disease before transplantation, especially pre-existing peripheral vascular disease, had a significant effect on mortality in diabetic patients (P = 0.0003). After transplantation, diabetic patients had significantly more cerebrovascular accidents (23 versus 3%), peripheral vascular disease (31 versus 3%), and number of infections (1.9 versus 1.2). Retransplantation was carried out in each group to the same extent, with the same success rate.     

Outcomes of pancreas transplants for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to examine how effectively pancreas transplants provide long-term glucose control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). We used guidelines from the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the World Health Organization (WHO) to appropriately classify recipients with type 2 DM (vs. type 1 DM). RESULTS: From 1994 through 2002, a total of 17 patients with type 2 DM underwent a pancreas transplant at our center. Mean recipient age was 52.5 yr. The mean age at diabetes onset was 35.7 yr; mean duration, 16.8 yr. Most recipients had one or more secondary complications related to their diabetes: retinopathy (94%), neuropathy (76%), or nephropathy (65%). At the time of their transplant, three (18%) were on oral hypoglycemic agents alone and 14 (82%) were on insulin therapy. Of the 17 transplants, seven (41%) were a simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant (SPK); four (24%), pancreas after kidney transplant (PAK); and six (35%), pancreas transplant alone (PTA). One recipient died during the perioperative period because of aspiration. The other 16 recipients became euglycemic post-transplant and had a functional graft at 1 yr post-transplant (patient and graft survival rates, 94%). Now, with a mean follow-up of 4.3 yr post-transplant, the patient survival rate is 71%. The four additional deaths were because of sepsis (n = 2), suicide (n = 1), and unknown cause (n = 1). All four of these recipients were insulin-independent at the time of death, although one was on an oral hypoglycemic agent. Of the 12 recipients currently alive, 11 remain euglycemic without requiring insulin therapy or oral hypoglycemic agents; one began insulin therapy 1.2 yr post-transplant (current daily dose, 60 units). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that pancreas transplants can provide excellent glucose control in recipients with type 2 DM. All 16 (94%) of our recipients whose transplant was technically successful were rendered euglycemic. Long-term results were comparable with those seen in transplant recipients with type 1 DM.     

Greater early pancreas graft loss in women compared with men after simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND: Gender differences in graft survival has been reported after some types of organ transplantation, but not after pancreas transplantation. This study compares graft survival between women and men after simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPK). METHODS: All first time SPK (n = 163) transplants (109 M/54 F) performed between 1989 and 2000 at University of Nebraska Medical Center, where data was available, were analyzed for overall graft and patient survival. Graft failure was then subdivided into early (<6 months), and late (>6 months), and compared between women and men. RESULTS: The 5-yr pancreas and kidney graft survival rates for all SPK recipients was 86% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 81-92%] and 87% (95% CI = 82-93%), respectively. While overall pancreas graft survival in women was similar to men (p = 0.16), early pancreas graft failure was greater in women than men (p = 0.010) with no one cause for failure predominant. There was no gender difference in late pancreas graft failure or in early, or late kidney graft failure in the same recipients. The gender difference was unexplained by differences in age, immunosuppression, body mass index (BMI), or diabetes duration between women and men. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report of a gender difference in pancreas graft survival after SPK with greater early (<6 months) pancreas graft failure in women than men. With no gender difference in kidney graft failure in the same individuals, gender differences in immune responses are unlikely to be the cause. Multiple variables likely contribute.     

Outcome of cadaver kidney transplantation in 23 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) is a growing cause of end-stage renal failure worldwide. Yet, only a minority of type 2 diabetics are considered today for kidney transplantation (KT). The scarcity of data on the outcome of such patients after KT prompted us to review our experience. METHODS: Between 1 January 1983 and 30 June 1996, 23 patients with type 2 DM received a first cadaver KT at a mean age of 57+/-9 (41-73) years, after a dialysis period ranging from 5 to 72 (mean 25+/-18) months. Only nine patients had a history of coronary and/or peripheral vascular disease before KT. All were given cyclosporin- or tacrolimus-based immunosuppression. Post-KT follow-up ranged from 4 to 181 (mean 70+/-38) months. Outcome analysis focused on the impact of cardiovascular complications. RESULTS: Patient survival at 1, 5 and 8 years was 91, 83 and 76% respectively. Death was due to infection in three patients and to a cardiovascular event in two. The actuarial risk of coronary, cerebrovascular, peripheral vascular, and any cardiovascular event after KT was 14, 13, 9 and 30% at 1 year, 20, 13, 50 and 58% at 5 years, and 20, 46, 66 and 72% at 8 years respectively. Post-KT hospital readmissions averaged 10 days/patient-year and were mostly related to the management of peripheral vascular disease. CONCLUSION: KT is an excellent therapeutic option for selected patients with type 2 DM. Peripheral vascular disease is the leading cause of morbidity following KT. KT should be considered in type 2 diabetics with a low/medium cardiovascular risk.     

Macrovascular disease after simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation

The objective of this study was to evaluate the outcome of simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation (SPK) with focus on cardiovascular mortality and morbidity in relation to graft function. From January 1985 through 1999, 87 SPK were performed in the unit. Sixty recipients were males, median age at diabetes onset 13 yr (1-40) and age at transplantation 39 yr (29-54). No case was lost to follow-up. Morbidity and mortality during median 8 yr of follow-up (range 1-15 yr) were recorded. Major macrovascular disease (MVD) was defined as myocardial infarction or sudden death (AMI), stroke or peripheral gangrene requiring amputation of leg, foot or fingers. At the evaluation, 26 of 87 patients (30%) had died, 19 after loss of the pancreas graft and 20 after loss of the kidney. MVD was the dominant cause of death. Non-lethal MVD had previously been recorded in 62%. Of the 61 patients alive, 22 had lost their pancreas graft and 12 the concomitant kidney. MVD had occurred in 32%. Whereas 89% of the concomitant kidneys functioned when the pancreas graft did so, only 37% of the kidneys functioned if the pancreas had been lost, p < 0.0001. The mortality rate was significantly higher among patients who lost both grafts (16/26) than in those who lost only the pancreas graft (3/15), p = 0.01. Progressive MVD is a major clinical problem for SPK transplant patients, particularly if the kidney fails.     

Combined pancreas and kidney transplantation improves survival in patients with end-stage diabetic nephropathy

The purpose of this study was to find out whether prolonged normoglycemia, as achieved by a successful pancreas transplantation, can improve survival in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. A retrospective analysis of actual 10-yr patient survival rates was done for all renal graft recipients who were given transplants more than 10 yr ago but within the cyclosporin era (i.e. 1981-1988). The actual 10-yr patient survival rate in non-diabetic renal graft recipients was 72%, In recipients of pancreas and kidney grafts and with prolonged function of the pancreas graft, the survival rate was 60%, whereas in patients subjected to simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation, but where the pancreatic grafts failed within 2 yr, the survival rate was 33%. In diabetic recipients of kidney transplants alone, the survival rate was 37%. The patient survival rate was substantially higher in non-diabetic patients and patients with functioning pancreas grafts compared with diabetic patients with kidney transplants alone or with failed pancreas grafts. We speculate that the decrease in mortality was due to the beneficial effect of long-term normoglycemia on diabetic late complications.     

The time interval between kidney and pancreas transplantation and the clinical outcomes of pancreas after kidney transplantation

Pancreas after kidney (PAK) transplantation is one of the accepted pancreas transplant modalities. We studied the impact of time interval between kidney and pancreas transplantation on the outcomes of PAK transplantation. Using OPTN/SRTR data, we included 1853 PAK transplants performed between 1996 and 2005 with follow-up until November 1, 2008. Kaplan-Meier survival and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed using the time interval between kidney and pancreas transplantation either as a categorical (less than one yr, between one and less than three yr, and greater than or equal to three yr) or as a continuous variable (months) to assess kidney graft and patient survival. Patients who received a pancreas transplant three yr or later after kidney transplantation had higher risk of death-censored kidney graft loss (HR 1.56, 95% CI 1.04, 2.32, p = 0.03). Each month beyond three yr between kidney and pancreas transplantation incurred 1% higher risk of subsequent death-censored kidney graft loss (HR 1.01, 95% CI 1.001, 1.02, p = 0.03). In conclusion, time interval between pancreas and kidney transplantation is an independent risk factor of kidney graft loss following pancreas transplantation. Shortening the time interval between pancreas and kidney transplantation to less than three yr may reduce the risk of kidney graft loss in qualified PAK transplant candidates.     

Predictors and outcomes of delayed graft function after living‐donor kidney transplantation

Delayed graft function (DGF) following deceased donor kidney transplantation is associated with inferior outcomes. Delayed graft function following living‐donor kidney transplantation is less common, but its impact on graft survival unknown. We therefore sought to determine risk factors for DGF following living‐donor kidney transplantation and DGF's effect on living‐donor kidney graft survival. We analyzed living‐donor kidney transplants performed between 2000 and 2014 in the UNOS dataset. A total of 64 024 living‐donor kidney transplant recipients were identified, 3.6% developed DGF. Cold ischemic time, human leukocyte antigen mismatch, donor age, panel reactive antibody, recipient diabetes, donor and recipient body mass index, recipient race and gender, right nephrectomy, open nephrectomy, dialysis status, ABO incompatibility, and previous transplants were independent predictors of DGF in living‐donor kidney transplants. Five‐year graft survival among living‐donor kidney transplant recipients with DGF was significantly lower compared with graft survival in those without DGF (65% and 85%, respectively, P < 0.001). DGF more than doubled the risk of subsequent graft failure (hazard ratio = 2.3, 95% confidence interval: 2.1–2.6; P < 0.001). DGF after living‐donor kidney transplantation is associated with inferior allograft outcomes. Minimizing modifiable risk factors may improve outcomes in living‐donor kidney transplantation.     

Comprehensive review: Frailty in pancreas transplant candidates and recipients

Well-selected patients with kidney disease and diabetes mellitus who undergo simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation often experience dramatic improvements in quality of life and long-term survival compared to those who remain on medical therapy. Over the past several years the importance of frailty in the pancreas transplant candidate and recipient populations has grown. More patients with advanced age have entered the waitlist, and complications from prolonged diabetes, even in younger patients, have created increased evidence of risk for frailty. Given these concerns, and the broad challenges facing pancreas transplantation volumes overall, we generated this review to help establish the impact and implications. We summarize the interplay of immunological factors, aging, environmental factors, diabetes mellitus, and chronic kidney disease that put these patients at risk for frailty. We discuss its measurement and recommend a combination of two instruments (both well-validated and one entirely objective). We describe the outcomes for patients before and after pancreas transplantation who may have frailty, and what interventions can be taken to mitigate its effects. Broader investigation into frailty in the pancreas transplant population is needed to better understand how to select patients for pancreas transplantation and to how manage its consequences thereafter.     

A comparative study of pancreas transplantation between type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus

BackgroundPancreas transplantation remains the best long-term treatment option to achieve physiological euglycemia and insulin independence in patients with labile diabetes mellitus (DM). It is widely accepted as an optimal procedure for type 1 DM (T1DM), but its application in type 2 DM (T2DM) is not unanimously acknowledged.MethodsIn total, 146 diabetes patients undergoing pancreas transplantation were included in this study. Clinical data and outcomes were compared between the T1DM and T2DM groups.ResultsMajority (93%) of the pancreas transplantations in T2DM were for uremic recipients. Complications occurred in 106 (73%) patients, including 70 (48%) with early complications before discharge and 79 (54%) with late complications during follow-up period. Overall, rejection of pancreas graft occurred in 37 (25%) patients. Total rejection rate in T2DM recipients was significantly lower than that in T1DM. The short- and long-term outcomes for endocrine function in terms of fasting blood sugar and hemoglobin A1c levels and graft survival rates are comparable between the T2DM and T1DM groups.ConclusionsT2DM is not inferior to T1DM after pancreas transplantation in terms of surgical risks, immunological and endocrine outcomes, and graft survival rates. Therefore, pancreas transplantation could be an effective option to treat selected uremic T2DM patients without significant insulin resistance.     

High terminal creatinine donors should not preclude simultaneous kidney and pancreas transplantation

BackgroundSimultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation (SPK) in the setting of end-stage renal disease offers unmatched outcomes in insulin dependent diabetic patients. Donor pool expansion through the transplantation of kidneys with acute kidney injury (AKI) is controversial.Methods59 SPK transplants were classified by presence of donor AKI, defined as donor terminal creatinine ≥ 1.5x the initial creatinine or donor terminal creatinine > 4.0 mg/dL. Endpoints included graft and patient survival, delayed graft function (DGF), serum creatinine, glomerular filtration rate (GFR), Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and acute rejection.ResultsThe donor AKI group (n = 35) had significantly higher rates of DGF (38 v. 9%, p = 0.01). There was no difference in creatinine or GFR at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months. HbA1c was comparable at 3, 6 and 12 months. There was no significant difference in the percentage of patients that required anti-diabetic agents after transplant (14 v. 4%, p = 0.56).ConclusionsWe observed increased rates of DGF in SPK recipients with donor AKI. However, equivalent outcomes of pancreas and kidney function in both groups were observed.