How to use neoadjuvant medical treatment to maximize surgery in melanoma

Introduction: The aim of this work is to discuss the role of neoadjuvant therapy in melanoma patients, namely the potential to improve control and surgical resectability of locoregional disease. Moreover, potential survival benefits for high-risk stage III and IV melanoma patients will be addressed.

Areas covered: In this review, the different available neoadjuvant treatments including chemotherapy, bio-chemotherapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy and local therapy will be presented and discussed. The PubMed published articles were identified and searched using the following terms located in the publication title: neoadjuvant therapy and melanoma. Studies investigating targeted therapy, immunotherapy and local melanoma treatments were included. Clinicaltrial.gov was also used as a source for recruiting or ongoing but not recruiting neoadjuvant clinical trials, for which no published results are available.

Expert commentary: Targeted therapy and immunotherapy in a neoadjuvant setting are still under investigation and not yet approved, however several neoadjuvant trials are ongoing. Shortly, results from these trials will answer the question whether neoadjuvant treatment translates into survival benefit and improves local disease control in stage III and IV melanoma patients. Immunotherapy and targeted therapy will play as relevant a role as in the metastatic setting, whereas chemotherapy will be used seldom.     

Melanoma trials that defined surgical management: Brief overview of current/upcoming adjuvant/neoadjuvant trials

Adjuvant systemic therapy for cutaneous melanoma has experienced practice-changing shifts over the last decade. The successful results of immunotherapies and targeted therapies in the metastatic setting have allowed for investigative trials of the same therapies in the adjuvant and now neoadjuvant setting, with the potential for improved clinical outcomes in patients with high risk resected Stage III and IV melanoma.     

Pathological assessment of resection specimens after neoadjuvant therapy for metastatic melanoma

BackgroundClinical trials have recently evaluated safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy among patients with surgically resectable regional melanoma metastases. To capture informative prognostic data connected to pathological response in such trials, it is critical to standardize pathologic assessment and reporting of tumor response after this treatment.MethodsThe International Neoadjuvant Melanoma Consortium meetings in 2016 and 2017 assembled pathologists from academic centers to develop consensus guidelines for pathologic examination and reporting of surgical specimens from AJCC (8th edition) stage IIIB/C/D or oligometastatic stage IV melanoma patients treated with neoadjuvant-targeted or immune therapy. Patterns of pathologic response are provided context to inform these guidelines.ResultsBased on our collective experience and guided by efforts in well-established neoadjuvant settings like breast cancer, procedures directing handling of pre- and post-neoadjuvant therapy–treated melanoma specimens are provided to facilitate comparison of findings across different trials and centers. Definitions of pathologic response are provided together with guidelines for reporting and quantifying the extent of pathologic response. Finally, the spectrum of histopathologic responses observed following neoadjuvant-targeted and immune-checkpoint therapy is described and illustrated.ConclusionsStandardizing pathologic evaluation of resected melanoma metastases following neoadjuvant-targeted or immune-checkpoint therapy allows more robust stratification of patient outcomes. This includes recognizing the spectrum of histopathologic response patterns to neoadjuvant therapy and a standard approach to grading pathologic responses. Such an approach will facilitate comparison of results across clinical trials and inform ongoing correlative studies into the mechanisms of response and resistance to agents applied in the neoadjuvant setting.     

Updates in Neoadjuvant Therapy for Triple Negative Breast Cancer

Neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer refers to systemic therapy administered prior to definitive surgery. It was originally developed for patients with locally advanced breast cancer (stage III) with the intention of downstaging unresectable tumors, and decreasing the extent of surgical intervention, including axillary lymph node dissection. For patients with inflammatory breast cancer, neoadjuvant therapy is considered a standard of care. Increasingly, the neoadjuvant setting is being utilized to accelerate drug development and approval in triple negative breast cancer, a diverse and aggressive subgroup for which no approved targeted therapies are currently available. This review discusses the use of pathologic complete response as a clinical trial endpoint, the use of imaging and biomarkers to predict response to therapy, and standard of care treatment for triple negative breast cancer. Finally, we review novel targets and drug trials in the neoadjuvant setting.     

Current topics in melanoma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: New approaches to melanoma are emerging. This review summarizes developments over the past 12 months. RECENT FINDINGS: Surgical, chemotherapeutic, immunologic and targeted therapies for melanoma are evolving. Sentinel lymph node sampling is now accepted as the standard of care for patients with intermediate thickness primary melanomas. Temozolomide continues to be widely used as part of combination therapy, and recent evidence suggests that a combination of temozolomide and interferon-alpha may be superior to temozolomide alone. Meanwhile, temozolomide and thalidomide carries unacceptable thrombosis risk. In the area of immunotherapy, anti-CTLA-4 continues to show promise, but special attention must be paid to gastrointestinal toxicity. Interferon-alpha, in addition, has shown efficacy in the neoadjuvant setting with inflammatory infiltrates demonstrated in tumors. A better understanding of the complex genetic regulation of melanoma cell growth is emerging and this is expected to lead to the development of novel targeted therapies. SUMMARY: Research is producing a more complete understanding of melanoma genetics and immune regulation. These are beginning to produce therapeutics that are impacting clinical practice.     

Neoadjuvant Treatments for Advanced Resectable Melanoma

Neoadjuvant therapy has demonstrated promise as a treatment modality in resectable advanced-stage melanoma. Treatment has evolved beyond chemotherapy, with the utilization of biochemotherapy, immunotherapy, and targeted therapy in the neoadjuvant setting. These therapies have shown better progression-free survival and melanoma-specific survival when compared with patients that proceed directly to surgery. Ongoing clinical trials will continue to propel research forward to improve the available options for patients with resectable advanced regional disease.     

Total neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer

While outcomes for patients with locally advanced disease have improved considerably with combined modality therapy, there is now an emphasis on developing risk-adapted treatment strategies. Moreover, the primary cause of death from locally advanced rectal cancer is related to distant progression, which now exceeds the rate of local failure. Thus, the necessity to optimally address micrometastatic disease has led to increasing interest in delivering chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting rather than in the postoperative setting. This review critically appraises the emerging literature on the options for sequencing of therapy, focusing on the total neoadjuvant therapy paradigm as well as emerging options for omitting components of multimodality therapy.     

Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy in breast cancer

The use of endocrine therapy is well established as a primary treatment for locally advanced breast cancer. However, despite the current popularity of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for operable tumours, there is relatively little published evidence for pre-operative endocrine therapy in operable disease, particularly outside of the elderly population. The wider use of aromatase inhibitors (AIs) has encouraged studies that compare the efficacy of AIs with tamoxifen in the neoadjuvant setting, but there remains a lack of comparison of neoadjuvant with adjuvant endocrine therapies. This review discusses the current evidence regarding primary endocrine therapy, along with the factors involved in choosing appropriate patients for neoadjuvant therapy and the current opinions on length of treatment time and measurement of response prior to surgery.     

Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4/6 Inhibitors in Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy of Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer

The landscape of therapeutic options for the treatment of hormone receptor (HR)-positive (HR⁺) HER2⁻ breast cancer (BC) has been profoundly changed by the introduction of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors into the metastatic setting. Currently all CDK4/6 inhibitors are approved only in the metastatic setting by Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicine Agency (EMA), whereas their role in the neoadjuvant setting is still at an investigational stage. Exploitation of novel agents such as CDK4/6 inhibitors to improve the efficacy of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) or to overcome de novo resistance to ET is an area of research under active evaluation. We present a review of the currently available data and ongoing clinical trials that are evaluating the role of CDK4/6 inhibitors in neoadjuvant therapy of HR⁺ HER2⁻ early BC, and also illustrate translational aspects, such as the potential biomarkers of response to these new therapeutic agents.     

Neoadjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer: State of the Science and Future Directions

Systemic neoadjuvant chemotherapy has long been known to confer clinical benefits for breast cancer patients by downstaging inoperable disease or providing those with operable disease the opportunity for breast conservation, without compromising risk of recurrence. In recent years, its benefits have broadened as it has become a pivotal platform for clinical research, providing new prognostic and predictive insights into in vivo response to therapy and long-term outcomes. The use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the research setting has expanded our knowledge of heterogeneity in tumor biology and chemosensitivity and provided insights into the relationships between molecular signatures of tumors, pathologic complete response (pCR), and long-term outcomes. This has provided opportunities to specifically select patients who might benefit from novel therapies and test these in a more efficient manner. Despite these major advancements, however, the majority of patients do not attain a pathologic complete response with systemic neoadjuvant chemotherapy. This review describes the standard of care for systemic neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer and discusses current management controversies and ongoing clinical trials designed to increase the proportion of patients who currently achieve a pCR.     

Neoadjuvant therapy for high-risk bulky regional melanoma

Clinically detectable regional lymph node melanoma metastasis (AJCC stage IIIB-C) carries a risk of relapse and death that approaches 70% at 5 years. Surgical management is the cornerstone of therapy, with postoperative adjuvant therapy utilizing high-dose interferon alfa-2b (HDI). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or immunotherapy in addition to surgery has been demonstrated to improve outcome in the management of patients with a variety of solid tumors. In patients with melanoma, the characteristics of the host immune response differ between patients with earlier stage and those with more advanced stages of disease (and particularly between those with measurable active disease and those without measurable gross disease) providing rationale for neoadjuvant approaches with immunotherapy. Host immune tolerance is now understood to impede the results of therapy for advanced disease, but appears to be less an issue for patients with microscopic high-risk operable disease, where the host may be more susceptible to immunologic interventions. Phase II studies have shown that neoadjuvant biochemotherapy has limited activity in melanoma patients with local-regional metastases, where chemotherapy may potentially alter the effects of immunotherapeutic agents. Studies of neoadjuvant HDI therapy for high-risk melanoma patients with bulky regional stage IIIB-C lymphadenopathy have shown unexpectedly high clinical and pathologic response rates, without increased morbidity. Through the design of neoadjuvant trials utilizing promising emerging melanoma therapeutics in which it is possible to obtain biopsy samples before and after therapy, a greater understanding of the dynamic interaction between tumors and the immune system is possible. This should lead to the identification of new targets for the treatment of melanoma and aid the development of new immunotherapy that may have greater specificity and less toxicity. This will simplify the evaluation of promising new combinations of agents with HDI to build on the clinical, immunologic, and molecular effect of this therapy for patients with melanoma.     

Adjuvant therapy for malignant melanoma

Malignant melanoma is increasing in incidence worldwide, and many patients remain at a significant risk of recurrence following surgical resection. Over the past 30 years, interferon-α has been the only agent approved for adjuvant therapy of melanoma. This review summarizes the rationale for adjuvant therapy, and discusses the roles of interferon, immunotherapy, chemotherapy and radiation therapy in the adjuvant setting. New approaches and novel combinations that appear promising for the adjuvant therapy of malignant melanoma are also outlined.     

Neoadjuvant endocrine treatment of women with breast cancer

Neoadjuvant therapy has four goals in breast cancer: decrease tumor volume to operate tumors that initially were inoperable, increase the number of conservative surgeries, evaluate the chemosensitivity in vivo and analyze the management of micrometastases. Neoadjuvant treatment provides a unique setting in which we can monitor clinical, pathological, proliferative and molecular responses. Combining different strategies such us surgery, radiation therapy, chemotherapy, and endocrine therapy has contributed substantially to the survival improvement in breast cancer. Third-generation aromatase inhibitors have proven to be superior to tamoxifen in the adjuvant and, more recently, the neoadjuvant treatment of postmenopausal patients. The need to define how to select the patients that will benefit the most from these therapies, the optimal duration of treatment, the best method to evaluate the treatment response, the identification of predictive factors for response, and the superiority of certain endocrine agents over others have been reviewed. We have carried out a critical analysis of the current literature on the utilization of endocrine therapy in the neoadjuvant setting for breast cancer. This review discusses the current evidence regarding primary endocrine therapy and the current opinions on length of treatment and measurement of response prior to surgery.     

Adjuvant therapy for malignant melanoma

Malignant melanoma is increasing in incidence worldwide, and many patients remain at a significant risk of recurrence following surgical resection. Over the past 30 years, interferon-alpha has been the only agent approved for adjuvant therapy of melanoma. This review summarizes the rationale for adjuvant therapy, and discusses the roles of interferon, immunotherapy, chemotherapy and radiation therapy in the adjuvant setting. New approaches and novel combinations that appear promising for the adjuvant therapy of malignant melanoma are also outlined.     

Current status of adjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer

In this article, we review the rationale for and outcomes associated with the use of adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy for resectable and borderline resectable cancer of the pancreatic head and uncinate process. Localized pancreatic cancer is a systemic disease that requires nonoperative therapies to minimize the local and systemic recurrences that almost invariably occur in the absence of such therapy, even following complete surgical resection. A well-defined role exists for the systemic administration of gemcitabine or 5-fluorouracil in the postoperative setting. Although the survival benefit associated with adjuvant chemoradiation has not been as rigorously defined, its use is supported by extensive historic experience; chemoradiation should be considered particularly for patients at high risk for local recurrence. Delivery of chemotherapy and/or chemoradiation prior to surgery has multiple potential advantages, although the superiority of neoadjuvant therapy over standard postoperative therapy has yet to be demonstrated. Neoadjuvant therapy may be particularly beneficial among patients with borderline resectable cancers. Although the existing literature is confusing, and indeed controversial, available evidence suggests that systemic chemotherapy and/or chemoradiation should be offered to all patients with pancreatic cancer who undergo potentially curative resection. Well-designed prospective trials are needed to define the optimal adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy strategy for these patients.     

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for soft tissue sarcoma

Soft tissue sarcoma is a rare and very heterogeneous disease. The prognosis of these cancers is mainly influenced by histological grading size location and type of histology. Many aspects argue in favor of neoadjuvant chemotherapy but no singular trial could unambiguously prove an advantage of neoadjuvant therapy. This short review has a focus on neoadjuvant chemotherapy as induction therapy prior to chemoradiation or neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone.     

Neoadjuvant taxanes in the treatment of non-metastatic breast cancer: a systematic review

In recent years the role of neoadjuvant (primary, preoperative) chemotherapy has undergone rapid progress. Initially, neoadjuvant chemotherapy use was limited to those patients with inoperable locally advanced breast cancer in an attempt to try to down-size the tumour to make effective surgery possible. The advent of more effective chemotherapy regimens has led to an increased use of neoadjuvant therapy to shrink potentially operable tumours to allow for breast conservation when a mastectomy would have been required previously. While neoadjuvant treatment for operable tumours has indeed allowed increased rates of breast conserving surgery, it has not yet demonstrated any survival benefit over standard postoperative anthracycline-based chemotherapy. Echoing the evolution of taxane based chemotherapy from the metastatic setting through to the adjuvant situation, there has been increased interest in the role of taxanes in neoadjuvant regimens. The use of taxane-based therapies in this setting has so far shown improvements over more standard regimens in terms of clinical response rates, breast conservation, pathologic response rates, disease free survival, and overall survival. The aim of this review is to systematically summarize and interpret the results of published randomized controlled trials of neoadjuvant taxane chemotherapy for women with non-metastatic breast cancer.     

Systematic review of taxane-containing versus non-taxane-containing regimens for adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatment of early breast cancer

The use of taxanes in early breast cancer is increasing. However, there are few mature studies of taxanes in this setting, and their role is uncertain. Our systematic review of randomised trials of adjuvant or neoadjuvant systemic therapy identified ten reported trials comparing a taxane-containing group with a non-taxane-containing control group in women with early breast cancer. Four of five neoadjuvant trials showed higher rates of complete response with taxanes, although differences were not significant. All five adjuvant trials showed improvements in disease-free survival with taxanes, and these improvements were significant in three trials and independent of oestrogen-receptor status. Two trials showed a significant improvement in overall survival. These results support the use of adjuvant taxanes in women with early breast cancer and involved lymph nodes. Longer follow-up of these trials and results from continuing trials are needed to clarify the best use of taxanes in early breast cancer.     

Targeted therapy for uveal melanoma

Uveal melanoma is the most common primary intra-ocular malignancy in adults. Overall mortality rate remains high because of the development of metastatic disease, which is highly resistant to systemic therapy. Improved understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of cancers has led to a new generation of therapeutic agents that interfere with a specific pathway critical in tumor development or progression. Although no specific genes have been linked to the pathogenesis of uveal melanoma, which differs from that of cutaneous melanoma, progress has been made in identifying potential targets involved in uveal melanoma apoptosis, proliferation, invasion, metastasis, and angiogenesis. This review focuses on the prospects for improving the systemic therapy of uveal melanoma using molecularly targeted agents that are currently in clinical use as well as agents being tested in clinical trials. Preclinical studies suggest potential benefit of inhibitors of Bcl-2, ubiquitin-proteasome, histone deactylase, mitogen-activated protein kinase and phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase-AKT pathways, and receptor tyrosine kinases. Modifiers of adhesion molecules, matrix metalloproteinase, and angiogenic factors also have demonstrated potential benefit. Clinical trials of some of these approaches have been initiated in patients with metastatic uveal melanoma as well as in the adjuvant setting after primary therapy.     

Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy for breast cancer: an overview

The clinical benefits of endocrine therapy for patients with hormonosensitive breast cancer remains perfectly established. For instance, tamoxifen, the gold standard of the adjuvant treatment, has largely contributed of the effectiveness of such a therapy. The recent development of new endocrine agents (the third-generation aromatase inhibitors, selective estrogen receptors modulators), provides to physicians the opportunity of a more effective and tolerable therapeutic approach, in the metastatic disease setting or likely in adjuvant setting for breast cancer patients. Preoperative therapy has been widely used for the treatment of initially inoperable locally advanced breast cancers with the main objective of breast-conserving surgery. The benefits of neoadjuvant chemotherapy has widely been demonstrated; however, the success of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy is much recent. The clinical and pharmacological data of the main published studies using neoadjuvant hormonotherapy are presented herein this review. Therefore, clinical and histologic assessments of response brings essential informations about the breast cancer hormonal sensitivity, but may also be predictor of the future (adjuvant or metastatic) treatment responsiveness.