Is there a dose-response of medial wedge insoles on lower limb biomechanics in people with pronated feet during walking and running?

BackgroundAlthough the effects of medial wedge insoles on lower limb biomechanics have been investigated, information about the effects of different magnitudes of medial posting is still lacking.Research questionWhat are the dose-response effects of medial wedge insoles with postings varying between 0 °, 3 °, 6 °, and 9 ° of inclination on the lower limb biomechanics during walking and running in individuals with pronated feet?MethodsSixteen participants with an FPI ≥ 6 were recruited. Four arch-supported insole conditions with varying degrees of medial heel wedge were tested (0°, 3°, 6°, and 9°). A 3D motion analysis system with force plates was used to obtain the kinetics and kinematics of walking and running at self-selected speeds. To compare the ankle, knee, and hip angles and moments among conditions, a time series analysis was performed using Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM).ResultsA reduction in ankle eversion angle was observed during walking for all insoles. For running, the 6° and 9° insoles decreased the ankle eversion angle during early stance and increased this angle during the propulsive phase. A decrease in ankle eversion moment was observed in walking and running for 6° and 9° insoles. An increase in knee adduction moment occurred in walking and running for all insoles. For hip, the 6° and 9° insoles showed, during walking, a decrease in hip adduction angle and an increase in hip adduction and external rotation moments. For most variables, statistical differences were found for a greater period across the stance phase as the medial wedge increased, except for ankle eversion moment and hip external rotation moment during walking.SignificanceThe biomechanical effects over the time series for many of the parameters increased with the addition of insole inclination, showing a dose-response effect of medial wedge insoles on the lower limb biomechanics during walking and running in adults with excessive foot pronation.     

Addition of an arch support improves the biomechanical effect of a laterally wedged insole

In order to examine if the addition of an arch support could improve the biomechanical effect of the laterally wedged insole, three-dimensional gait analysis was performed on 20 healthy volunteers. Kinetic and kinematic parameters at the knee and subtalar joints were compared among the following four types of insoles; a 5-mm thick flat insole, a flat insole with an arch support (AS), a 6 degrees inclined laterally wedged insole (LW), and a laterally wedged insole with an arch support (LWAS). The knee adduction moment averaged for the entire stance phase was reduced by the use of LW and LWAS by 7.7% and 13.3%, respectively, from that with FLAT. The difference in knee adduction moment between LW and LWAS was most obvious in the late stance, which was ascribed to the difference in the progression angle between those insoles. The analyses also revealed that LW tended to increase step width, and that such an increase was completely eliminated by the addition of an arch support to LW. This reduction of step width could be another mechanism for the further reduction of the moment with LWAS. The analyses of biomechanical parameters at the subtalar joints suggested that LWAS allowed the subject to walk in a more natural manner, while exerting greater biomechanical effects than LW. Thus, the addition of an arch support to the laterally wedged insole reduced knee adduction moment more efficiently, possibly through the elimination of potential negative effects of the laterally wedged insole.     

Effects of medially wedged insoles on the biomechanics of the lower limbs of runners with excessive foot pronation and foot varus alignment

BackgroundExcessive foot pronation during running in individuals with foot varus alignment may be reduced by medially wedged insoles.Research questionThis study investigated the effects of a medially wedged insole at the forefoot and at the rearfoot on the lower limbs angles and internal moments of runners with excessive foot pronation and foot varus alignment.MethodsKinematic and kinetic data of 19 runners (11 females and 8 males) were collected while they ran wearing flat (control condition) and medially wedged insoles (insole condition). Both insoles had arch support. We used principal component analysis for data reduction and dependent t-test to compare differences between conditions.ResultsThe insole condition reduced ankle eversion (p = 0.003; effect size = 0.63); reduced knee range of motion in the transverse plane (p = 0.012; effect size = 0.55); increased knee range of motion in the frontal plane in early stance and had earlier knee adduction peak (p = 0.018; effect size = 0.52); reduced hip range of motion in the transverse plane (p = 0.031; effect size = 0.48); reduced hip adduction (p = 0.024; effect size = 0.50); reduced ankle inversion moment (p = 0.012; effect size = 0.55); and increased the difference between the knee internal rotation moment in early stance and midstance (p = 0.012; effect size = 0.55).SignificanceInsoles with 7˚ medial wedges at the forefoot and rearfoot are able to modify motion and moments patterns that are related to lower limb injuries in runners with increased foot pronation and foot varus alignment with some non-desired effects on the knee motion in the frontal plane.     

Foot alignments influence the effect of knee adduction moment with lateral wedge insoles during gait

Lateral wedge insoles (LWIs) reduce the peak external knee adduction moment (KAM). However, the efficacy of LWIs is limited in certain individuals for whom they fail to decrease KAM. Possible explanations for a lack of desired LWI response are variations in foot alignments. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the immediate biomechanical effects of LWIs depend on individual foot alignments during gait. Fifteen healthy adults participated in this study. Their feet were categorized as normal, pronated, and supinated using the foot posture index. All subjects were subsequently requested to perform a normal gait under barefoot and LWI conditions. A three-dimensional motion analysis system was used to record the kinematic and kinetic data, included peak KAM, KAM impulse (KAAI), center of pressure displacement, and knee-ground reaction force lever arm (KLA). Furthermore, lower limb frontal plane kinematic parameters at the rear foot, ankle, knee, and hip were evaluated. Among all feet, there was no significant difference in the peak KAM and KAAI between the conditions. In contrast, the peak KAM was significantly reduced under the LWI condition relative to the barefoot condition in the normal foot group. Reductions in the peak KAM were correlated with a more lateral center of pressure and reduced KLA. In addition, a reduced KLA was correlated with decreased hip adduction. LWIs significantly reduced the peak KAM in normal feet, indicating that biomechanical effects of LWIs vary between individual foot alignments. Our findings suggest that it is helpful to assess individual foot alignment to ensure adequate insole treatment for patients with knee osteoarthritis.     

An exploration of the effects of prefabricated and customized insoles on lower limb kinetics and kinematics during walking,stepping up and down tasks: A time series analysis

BackgroundPrefabricated and customized insoles are used in clinical practice to reduce foot pronation. Although data exist on the effects at key points within the stance phase, exploring the impact of different insoles using time series analysis may reveal more detail about their efficacy.Research questionWhat are the effects revealed by a time series analysis of arch-supported prefabricated insoles (PREFABRICATED) versus arch-supported prefabricated insoles customized with a 6º medial wedge (CUSTOMIZED) on the lower limb biomechanics during walking, stepping up and down tasks in individuals with pronated feet?MethodsNineteen individuals with excessive foot pronation performed walking, stepping up and down tasks using three insoles: CONTROL (flat insole), CUSTOMIZED, and PREFABRICATED. Angles and moments of ankle and knee coronal and hip transverse planes were compared between conditions using statistical parametric mapping (SPM).ResultsFor walking, CUSTOMIZED reduced ankle eversion moment compared to CONTROL during midstance and PREFABRICATED during propulsion. CUSTOMIZED decreased KAM during midstance and propulsion compared to PREFABRICATED. Compared to CONTROL, CUSTOMIZED and PREFABRICATED reduced hip internal rotation during propulsion and loading response, respectively. CUSTOMIZED decreased eversion movement during midstance and propulsion for the stepping up task. PREFABRICATED reduced eversion movement during midstance in comparison to CONTROL. For the stepping down task, CUSTOMIZED increased eversion movement during propulsion compared to PREFABRICATED. CUSTOMIZED reduced hip internal rotation angle for stepping up task during propulsion, decreased medial rotation movement during midstance compared to CONTROL, and reduced medial rotation during midstance compared to PREFABRICATED. CUSTOMIZED increased KAM for stepping up and down tasks during propulsion.SignificanceThese findings suggest that both CUSTOMIZED and PREFABRICATED reduce foot pronation. However, non-local effects, such as changes in KAM and hip internal rotation, were seen only in the CUSTOMIZED. Therefore, CUSTOMIZED may be preferable if the objective is to modify the knee and hip mechanics.     

Knee braces and foot orthoses multimodal treatment of medial knee osteoarthritis

BackgroundKnee braces and lateral wedge foot orthoses are two treatment options recommended for medial knee osteoarthritis, but the combination of both of them could further improve their effectiveness.Research questionThe aim was to evaluate whether the combination of lateral wedge foot orthoses with two types of knee brace enhances the biomechanical effects and pain relief during the stance phase of gait while maintaining comfort.MethodsTen patients with medial knee osteoarthritis were fitted with a standard valgus brace, an unloader brace with valgus and external rotation functions, and 7° lateral wedge foot orthoses. The pain relief, comfort, kinematics and kinetics of the lower limb were measured during walking without orthotics, with the combined and with the isolated treatments.ResultsThe valgus and external rotation brace significantly reduced the knee adduction moment and allowed more knee flexion both in isolation and in combination to foot orthoses compared to the valgus brace or without treatment. Pain relief was not significant with the different orthotic treatment modalities. The valgus brace and combined treatment with either brace significantly increased the discomfort level, whereas the valgus and external rotation brace or foot orthoses in isolation did not induce significant discomfort.SignificanceAmongst the tested orthotic treatment modalities, the valgus and external rotation brace obtained better biomechanical outcomes while maintaining comfort. The combined treatment with foot orthoses enhanced the effectiveness of the valgus brace, however foot orthoses may be unnecessary with the valgus and external rotation brace.     

The effect of modifying foot progression angle on the knee loading parameters in healthy participants with different static foot postures

BackgroundStudies have found that toe-in gait reduced the peak knee adduction moment (KAM) during early stance, while toe-out gait reduced the peak KAM during late stance. However, some other studies found that toe-in or toe-out gait could reduce the KAM throughout stance phase. There is still a divergence of opinion on the use of toe-in or toe-out gait for reducing the KAM.Research questionThis study aimed to investigate whether static foot posture affected participants’ biomechanical responses to three self-selected foot progression angles (FPA): neutral, toe-out and toe-in.MethodsTwenty-seven healthy participants were recruited for this FPA gait modification experiment and classified into three groups: neutral (n = 8), supination (n = 9) and pronation (n = 10), based on the Foot Posture Index (FPI). The kinematic and kinetic data were recorded with Vicon motion capture system and three force plates. The knee adduction moment and ankle eversion moment were calculated using an inverse dynamics model. The effect of the FPA modification on the knee loading parameters was analysed by the Friedman non-parametric test.ResultsThe KAM results in the neutral group showed that the toe-in gait modification reduced the first peak of the KAM (KAM1), while the KAM1 was increased in the supination group. The effect of the FPA modification on the KAM1 did not reach significance in the pronation group. The toe-out gait modification reduced the second peak (KAM2) regardless of the static posture.SignificanceDifferent static foot postures were correlated with different peak KAM during the early stance phase due to FPA modification. These data suggest that the assessment of static foot posture provides a reference on how to offer adequate FPA modification for knee OA patients with different foot postures.     

Running shoes, orthotics, and injuries

Running is the most visible expression of the continued interest in regular physical activities. Unfortunately injuries are common, primarily due to overuse, and a number of aetiological factors have been recognised. Of these, training errors can be responsible for up to 60% of injuries. The training surface, a lack of flexibility and strength, the stage of growth and development, poor footwear and abnormal biomechanical features have all been implicated in the development of running injuries. A thorough understanding of the biomechanics of running is a necessary prerequisite for individuals who treat or advise runners. Clinically, the configuration of the longitudinal arch is a valuable method of classifying feet and has direct implications on the development and management of running problems. The runner with excessively pronated feet has features which predispose him/her to injuries that most frequently occur at the medial aspect of the lower extremity: tibial stress syndrome; patellofemoral pain syndrome; and posterior tibialis tendinitis. These problems occur because of excessive motion at the subtalar joint and control of this movement can be made through the selection of appropriate footwear, plus orthotic foot control. The runner with cavus feet often has a rigid foot and concomitant problems of decreased ability to absorb the force of ground contact. These athletes have unique injuries found most commonly on the lateral aspect of the lower extremity: iliotibial band friction syndrome; peroneus tendinitis; stress fractures; trochanteric bursitis; and plantar fasciitis. Appropriate footwear advice and the use of energy-absorbing materials to help dissipate shock will benefit these individuals. Running shoes for the pronated runner should control the excessive motion. The shoes should be board-lasted, straight-lasted, have a stable heel counter, extra medial support, and a wider flare than the shoes for the cavus foot. For these athletes a slip-lasted, curve-lasted shoe with softer ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) and a narrow flare is appropriate. Orthotic devices are useful in selected runners with demonstrated biomechanical abnormalities that contribute to the injury. Soft orthotics made of a commercial insole laminated with EVA are comfortable, easily adjusted, inexpensive, and more for-giving than the semirigid orthotics which are useful in cases where the soft orthotic does not provide adequate foot control. A review of injury data shows an alarming rise in the incidence of knee pain in runners-from 18% to 50% of injuries in 13 years.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Long-term effects of lateral wedge orthotics on hip and ankle joint space widths

BackgroundLateral wedge insoles have been used for the treatment of medial knee osteoarthritis (OA) and have been shown to reduce loading of the medial compartment of the knee. However, as the entire lower extremity acts as a single kinetic chain, altering the biomechanics of the knee may also have significant effects at the ankles or hips. We aimed to evaluate the effects of lateral wedge orthotics on ankle and hip joints, compared to neutral orthotics, by assessing the changes in joint space width (JSW) during 36 months of continuous use.MethodsWe prospectively enrolled 109 subjects with symptomatic osteoarthritis of the medial knee according to the American College of Rheumatology criteria. The trial was double blind and patients were randomized to either wedged or neutral orthotic shoe inserts. Hip and ankle JSWs were quantified using plain radiographies at baseline and at 36-months follow-up.Findings45 patients completed the 36 month study. 31 of those who completed the study were using the lateral wedge versus 14 were using neutral orthotics. 2 patients in the wedge group had missing radiographs and were not included in the JSW analyses. There were no significant differences between the wedge and the neutral orthotics groups in the magnitude of JSW change at either the hip or the ankles at 36 month.InterpretationWe found no significant adverse effects of the lateral wedges on ankles or hips. (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00076453).     

Biomechanical effects of three types of foot orthoses in individuals with posterior tibial tendon dysfunction

BackgroundPosterior tibial tendon dysfunction (PTTD) is characterized by degeneration of this tendon leading to a flattening of the medial longitudinal arch of the foot. Foot orthoses (FOs) can be used as a treatment option, but their biomechanical effects on individuals with PTTD are not yet fully understood.Research questionThe aim of this study was to investigate the effects of three types of FOs on gait biomechanics in individuals with PTTD.MethodsFourteen individuals were recruited with painful stage 1 or 2 PTTD based on Johnson and Strom’s classification. Quantitative gait analysis of the affected limb was performed in four conditions: shoes only (Shoe), prefabricated FO (PFO), neutral custom FO (CFO) and custom varus FO (CVFO) with a 5° medial wedge and a 4 mm medial heel skive. A curve analysis, using 1D statistical parametric mapping, was undertaken to assess differences in lower limb joint motion, joint moments and muscle activity over the stance phase of gait across conditions.ResultsDecreased hindfoot eversion angles, decreased ankle inversion moments and increased ankle eversion moments were observed with custom FOs compared to the Shoe and PFO conditions (p < 0.001). CFOs and CVFOs induced an increased knee abduction moment compared to Shoe (p < 0.001). No changes in hip kinematics and kinetics or in EMG activity of tested muscles were observed between conditions.SignificanceCustom orthoses may be more suitable than PFOs to decrease the pathological biomechanical outcomes observed in PTTD. Decreased ankle inversion moments during the stance phase could explain why custom orthoses are effective at reducing pain in PTTD patients. However, clinicians should be careful when prescribing custom orthoses for PTTD since unwanted collateral biomechanical effects can be observed at the knee.     

The effects of foot orthosis and low-dye tape on lower limb joint angles and moments during running in individuals with pes planus

BackgroundPes Planus or Flat feet is one of the most common lower limb abnormalities. When runners with this abnormality participate in recreational running, interventional therapies could help in pain alleviation and enhance performance. To determine the most effective treatment, however, a biomechanical examination of the effects of each treatment modality is required.Research questionThe aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of Foot Orthoses (FOs) and Low-Dye Tape (LDT) on lower limb joint angles and moments during running in individuals with pes planus.Methodskinematic and kinetic data of 20 young people with pes planus were measured during running in three conditions: (1) SHOD (2) with shoes and FOs (3) with shoes and LDT. One-way repeated measure ANOVA was used to investigate the impacts of the FOs and LDT on the lower limb joint angles and moments throughout the stance phase of the running cycle.ResultsThe results showed that FOs reduced ankle eversion compared to SHOD and LDT (P < 0.001) and decreased the dorsiflexion angle (P = 0.005) and the plantarflexor moment compared to the SHOD (P < 0.001). FOs increased knee adduction angle (P = 0.021) and knee external rotator moment (P < 0.001) compared to both conditions and increased knee extensor and abductor moments compared to SHOD (P < 0.001). At the hip joint, FOs only increased hip external rotation compared with the LDT condition (P = 0.031); and LDT increased hip extensor moment compared to SHOD and FOs (P = 0.037) and also increased hip adduction angle compared to SHOD (P = 0.037).SignificanceFOs with a medial wedge appears to increase the external knee adduction moment and knee adduction angles, which are risk factors for the development and progression of knee osteoarthritis. Further, usage of FOs seems to reduce the ankle joint role in propulsion as it impacts the ankle sagittal angles and moments.     

Control conditions for footwear insole and orthotic research

Footwear insoles/orthotics alter variables associated with musculoskeletal injury; however, their clinical effectiveness is inconclusive. One explanation for this is the possibility that control conditions may actually produce biomechanical changes that induce clinical responses. The purpose of this study was to compare insole/orthotic control conditions to identify if variables at the ground, ankle and knee that are associated with injury are altered relative to what participants would normally experience in their own shoes. Gait analysis was performed on 15 participants during walking and running while wearing (1) their own shoes, (2) #1 with a 3 mm flat insole, (3) a standardized shoe, and (4) #3 with a 3 mm flat insole, where external knee adduction moments, external knee adduction angular impulses, internal ankle inversion moments, and vertical ground reaction force loading rates were determined. Conditions 2–4 were expressed as percent changes relative to condition 1, and tests of proportions assessed if there were a significant number of individuals experiencing a biomechanically relevant change for each variable. Repeated-measures ANOVAs were used to identify group differences between conditions. The majority of movement-footwear-variable combinations contained a proportion of individuals experiencing biomechanically relevant changes compared to condition 1 that was significantly greater than the expected proportion of 20%. No systematic differences were found between conditions. This suggests that conditions 2–4 may alter biomechanics relative to baseline for many participants, but not in a consistent way across participants. It is recommended that participant's own footwear be used as control conditions in future trials where biomechanics are primary variables of interest.     

The effect of foot orthoses on gait biomechanics and pain among people with rheumatoid arthritis: A quasi-experimental study

BackgroundFoot pain is frequent among people with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Foot orthoses (FO) are commonly prescribed with the intention to reduce pain symptoms and improve function.Research questionHow do a custom-made FO affect pain, gait biomechanics and daily activity among people with RA?MethodsTwenty-five participants with RA and foot pain completed this quasi-experimental study using a control insole for four weeks and then a custom-made FO in the following four weeks. The foot orthoses were customized by plantar foot shape targeting optimal restoration of normal arch height. A visual analog scale was used to monitor changes in ankle/foot, knee, hip joints, and global arthritis pain. In addition, the perceived pain area was measured using a body chart analysis. Kinematics and kinetics of the hip, knee and ankle joints during gait were analyzed using 3D-motion capture. Daily steps were measured with a wrist-based activity tracker for both the control insole and custom-made FO period, respectively.ResultsIn comparison to the control insole, the custom-made FO reduced ankle/foot pain intensity (p < 0.001) in addition to a reduction of the perceived pain areas in the feet (p < 0.001), legs (p = 0.012), as well as the arms and hands (p = 0.014). Ankle plantar flexion and eversion moments were also reduced (p < 0.001). No difference in daily steps was observed between the two periods (p = 0.657).SignificanceThis study has demonstrated an ankle/foot pain-relieving effect in conjunction with alterations of the ankle joint moments in people with RA using custom-made FO. The pain relief is plausibly attributed to alterations of the ankle joint moments when using the custom-made FO. However, future studies are needed to explore further into therapeutic implication of custom-made FO in pain management of people with RA.     

Relationship between foot muscle morphology and severity of pronated foot deformity and foot kinematics during gait: A preliminary study

BackgroundThe morphology of foot muscles that support the medial longitudinal arch differs between normal and pronated feet. The degree to which the difference depends on the severity of the pronated foot deformity is unclear. In the clinical setting, however, to reduce the pronated deformity, muscle-strengthening exercises are performed.Research questionDoes a relationship exist between foot muscle morphology and severity of the pronated foot deformity and foot kinematics during gait?MethodsUsing the six-item foot posture index (FPI-6), 26 study participants were assessed for their foot posture and divided into two groups of 13 participants each based on the FPI-6 score: pronated foot group (with a score of 6–9) and highly pronated foot group (with a score of 10–12). Select foot muscles were scanned with ultrasonography, and muscle thicknesses were measured. The following were the muscles of interest: abductor hallucis, flexor hallucis brevis and longus, flexor digitorum brevis and longus, and peroneus longus. Foot kinematic data during gait was collected using a three-dimensional motion capture system as a dynamic navicular drop.ResultsNo between-group differences were noted for muscle thickness and dynamic navicular drop. However, the abductor hallucis and flexor hallucis brevis thicknesses were correlated with the dynamic navicular drop, but not with the severity of the pronated foot deformity.SignificanceIn individuals with pronated foot deformity, more developed abductor hallucis and flexor hallucis brevis muscles may reduce the dynamic navicular drop that represents the degree of medial longitudinal arch deformation during the stance phase of gait.     

The effect of changing mediolateral center of pressure on rearfoot eversion during treadmill running

IntroductionAtypical rearfoot eversion is an important kinematic risk factor in running-related injuries. Prominent interventions for atypical rearfoot eversion include foot orthoses, footwear, and taping, yet a running gait retraining is lacking. Therefore, the aim was to investigate the effects of changing mediolateral center of pressure (COP) on rearfoot eversion, subtalar pronation, medial longitudinal arch angle (MLAA), hip kinematics and vertical ground reaction force (vGRF).MethodsFifteen healthy female runners underwent gait retraining under three conditions. Participants were instructed to run normally, on the lateral (COP lateral) and medial (COP medial) side of the foot. Foot progression angle (FPA) was controlled using real-time visual feedback. 3D measurements of rearfoot eversion, subtalar pronation, MLAA, FPA, hip kinematics, vGRF and COP were analyzed. A repeated-measures ANOVA followed by pairwise comparisons was used to analyze changes in outcome between three conditions. Data were also analyzed using statistic parameter mapping.ResultsRunning on the lateral side of the foot compared to normal running and running on the medial side of the foot reduced peak rearfoot eversion (mean difference (MD) with normal 3.3°, p < 0.001, MD with COP medial 6°, p < 0.001), peak pronation (MD with normal 5°, p < 0.001, MD with COP medial 9.6°, p=<0.001), peak MLAA (MD with normal 2.3°, p < 0.001, MD with COP medial 4.1°, p < 0.001), peak hip internal rotation (MD with normal 1.8°, p < 0.001), and peak hip adduction (MD with normal running 1°, p = 0.011). Running on the medial side of the foot significantly increased peak rearfoot eversion, pronation and MLAA compared to normal running.SignificanceThis study demonstrated that COP translation along the mediolateral foot axis significantly influences rearfoot eversion, MLAA, and subtalar pronation during running. Running with either more lateral or medial COP reduced or increased peak rearfoot eversion, peak subtalar pronation, and peak MLAA, respectively, compared to normal running. These results might use as a basis to help clinicians and researchers prescribe running gait retraining by changing mediolateral COP for runners with atypical rearfoot eversion or MLAA.     

The effectiveness of foot orthoses in the treatment of medial knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review

BackgroundKnee osteoarthritis is a disease of the joint causing decreased function and pain. Currently, treatments range from medication to surgery, with the use of different insoles and footwear recommended. These methods are effective by either correcting the position of the knee or providing shock absorption. However, there is little understanding of the effective characteristics of these devices.Research questionThis paper aims to investigate this question and provide future areas of research to help better define treatment guidelines. Foot orthoses are an example of non-pharmacological conservative treatments mentioned in National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines to treat knee osteoarthritis (OA). These include lateral wedge insoles (LWI), developed with the intention of load reduction of the knee. Different footwear has also been shown to affect pain, biomechanical and functional outcomes in knee OA patients.MethodsTo address what features of LWIs and footwear make them effective in the treatment of knee OA, scientific databases were used to search for papers on this topic and then selected to be included based on pre-defined criteria. Data were extracted and analysed from these studies to provide a basis for possible areas for future development of these foot orthoses, and research required to improve clinical treatment guidelines. Databases used were PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science.Results and significanceThirty-four out of 226 papers were included after application of inclusion and exclusion criteria. Regarding LWIs, the characteristics showing the most beneficial effect on either biomechanical, functional or pain outcomes were customisation, full-length, 5° elevation, shock absorption and arch support. For footwear, barefoot mimicking soles produced the most favourable biomechanics. Results also showed that insoles work in correcting the position of the knee, but it may or may not affect patients’ pain and function.     

Effects of idiopathic flatfoot deformity on knee adduction moments during walking

IntroductionFlatfoot deformity is commonly characterized by a subtalar valgus, a low medial longitudinal arch, and abduction of the forefoot. Although flatfoot deformity has been associated with lower first (KAM1) and second (KAM2) peak knee adduction moments during walking, the biomechanical connection remains unknown.Research questionWe hypothesized that hindfoot eversion, lateral calcaneal shift correlate with KAM1 and forefoot abduction and arch height with KAM2, due to the lateralization of the ground reaction force vector resulting from shifted heel and forefoot in flatfoot deformity.MethodsGait data from 103 children with flatfoot deformity who underwent three-dimensional gait analysis with the Oxford Foot Model were retrospectively included. Children with knee varus/valgus, in- and out-toeing were excluded. Fifteen healthy children with a rectus foot type were also collected from the database. Lateral calcaneal shift was defined as the distance between the projection of the ankle joint center onto the calcaneal axis and the midpoint of the calcaneal axis formed by the medial and lateral calcaneal markers. A subgroup of children with idiopathic flatfoot deformity that had received corrective surgery was also identified. Statistical analysis included Pearson’s correlations and independent and paired t-tests (α < .05).ResultsWhen compared to a norm cohort, flatfooted children had significant lower KAM1 and KAM2 (t-test, P < .001). Lateral calcaneal shift correlated with KAM1 and KAM2 (r = 0.42, p < .001 and r = 0.32, P < .001, respectively). Arch height correlated with KAM2 (r = 0.23, p = 0.017). KAM1 and KAM2 normalized after surgery and the change in KAM1 correlated with the change in lateral calcaneal shift for children who underwent corrective surgery.SignificanceLateral calcaneal shift explains the reduction of KAM1 by lateralization of the point of force application in flatfooted children. It is recommended to consider the lateral calcaneal shift when investigating KAM in gait analysis research.     

Immediate and 1 week effects of laterally wedge insoles on gait biomechanics in healthy females

It is estimated that approximately 45% of the U.S. population will develop knee osteoarthritis, a disease that creates significant economic burdens in both direct and indirect costs. Laterally wedged insoles have been frequently recommended to reduce knee abduction moments and to manage knee osteoarthritis. However, it remains unknown whether the lateral wedge will reduce knee abduction moments over a prolonged period of time. Thus, the purposes of this study were to (1) examine the immediate effects of a laterally wedged insole in individuals normally aligned knees and (2) determine prolonged effects after the insole was worn for 1 week. Gait analysis was performed on ten women with and without a laterally wedged insole. After participants wore the wedges for a week, a second gait analysis was performed with and without the insole. The wedged insole did not affect peak knee abduction moment, although there was a significant increase in knee abduction angular impulse after wearing the insoles for 1 week. Furthermore, there was a significant increase in vertical ground reaction force at the instance of peak knee abduction moment with the wedges. While the laterally wedged insole used in the current study did not alter knee abduction moments as expected, other studies have shown alterations. Future studies should also examine a longer acclimation period, the influence of gait speed, and the effect of different shoe types with the insole.     

Combined versus individual effects of a valgus knee brace and lateral wedge foot orthotic during stair use in patients with knee osteoarthritis

The aim of this study was to investigate the combined and individual biomechanical effects of a valgus knee brace and a lateral wedge foot orthotic during stair ascent and descent in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA). Thirty-five patients with varus alignment and medial knee OA were prescribed a custom valgus knee brace and lateral wedge foot orthotic. Knee angles and moments in the frontal and sagittal planes were determined from 3D gait analysis completed under four randomized conditions: (1) control (no knee brace or foot orthotic), (2) knee brace, (3) foot orthotic, and (4) combined knee brace and foot orthotic. Additional measures included the vertical ground reaction force, trunk lean, toe out and gait speed. During the combined use of a knee brace and foot orthotic, significant decreases in the knee adduction angle (2.17, 95%CI: 0.50-3.84, p = 0.013) and 2nd peak EKAM (0.35, 95%CI: 0.17–0.52, p < 0.001) were observed during stair descent; and significant increases in the EKFM were observed during stair ascent (0.54, 95%CI: 0.30–0.78, p < 0.001) and descent (1stpk: 0.48, 95%CI: 0.15-0.80, p = 0.005; 2ndpk: 0.55, 95%CI: 0.34–0.76, p < 0.001). Fewer gait compensations were observed between conditions during stair descent compared to ascent, except for toe out. Findings suggest greater effects on gait when both knee brace and foot orthotic are used together, resulting in a more normal gait pattern. However, whether or not a true change in knee joint load can be inferred when using these orthoses remains unclear. Further research is required to determine the clinical importance of the observed changes.