Accuracy of Pedicle Screw Insertion Using Fluoroscopy-Based Navigation-Assisted Surgery : Computed Tomography Postoperative Assessment in 96 Consecutive Patients

Objective

Two-dimensional fluoroscopy-based computerized navigation for the placement of pedicle screws offers the advantage of using stored patient-specific imaging data in providing real-time guidance during screw placement. The study aimed to describe the accuracy and reliability of a fluoroscopy-based navigation system for pedicle screw insertion.

Methods

A total of 477 pedicle screws were inserted in the lower back of 96 consecutive patients between October 2007 and June 2012 using fluoroscopy-based computer-assisted surgery. The accuracy of screw placement was evaluated using a sophisticated computed tomography protocol.

Results

Of the 477 pedicle screws, 461 (96.7%) were judged to be inserted correctly. Frank screw misplacement [16 screws (3.3%)] was observed in 15 patients. Of these, 8 were classified as minimally misplaced (≤2 mm); 3, as moderately misplaced (2.1-4 mm); and 5, as severely misplaced (>4 mm). No complications, including nerve root injury, cerebrospinal fluid leakage, or internal organ injury, were observed in any of the patients.

Conclusion

The accuracy of pedicle screw placement using a fluoroscopy-based computer navigation system was observed to be superior to that obtained with conventional techniques.     

Measuring the performance of patient-specific solutions for minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion surgery

Pre-surgical planning using 3D-printed BioModels enables the preparation of a “patient-specific” kit to assist instrumented spinal fusion surgery. This approach has the potential to decrease operating time while also offering logistical benefits and cost savings for healthcare. We report our experience with this method in 129 consecutive patients undergoing minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF) over 27 months at a single centre and performed by a single surgeon. Patient imaging and surgical planning software were used to manufacture a 3D-printed patient-specific MIS TLIF kit for each patient consisting of a 1:1 scale spine BioModel, stereotactic K-wire guide, osteotomy guide, and retractors. Pre-selected pedicle screws, rods, and cages were sourced and supplied with the patient-specific kit. Additional implants were available on-shelf to address a size discrepancy between the kit implant and intraoperative measurements. Each BioModel was used pre-operatively for surgical planning, patient consent and education. The BioModel was sterilised for intraoperative reference and navigation purposes. Efficiency measures included operating time (153 ± 44 min), sterile tray usage (14 ± 3), fluoroscopy screening time (57.2 ± 23.7 s), operative waste (19 ± 8 L contaminated, 116 ± 30 L uncontaminated), and median hospital stay (4 days). The pre-selected kit implants exactly matched intraoperative measurements for 597/639 pedicle screws, 249/258 rods, and 46/148 cages. Pedicle screw placement accuracy was 97.8% (625/639) on postoperative CT. Complications included one intraoperative dural tear, no blood products administered, and six reoperations. Our experience demonstrates a viable application of patient-specific 3D-printed solutions and provides a benchmark for studies of efficiency in spinal fusion surgery.     

神经外科手术机器人置入椎弓根螺钉的精准性

目的 探讨神经外科手术机器人在人体腰椎模型进行椎弓根螺钉置入的精准性.方法 利用0型臂影像系统对模型进行正侧位扫描,并三维重建,获取3D-CT数据,传入手术机器人系统,规划椎弓根螺钉的最佳进钉点和进钉方向.手术机器人系统利用3D-CT数据自动注册后,置入椎弓根螺钉.应用置钉前后的3D融合图像,按照Gertzbein-R...     

Cortical bone trajectory technique’s outcomes and procedures for posterior lumbar fusion: A retrospective study

Cortical Bone Trajectory screws allow a limited soft tissue dissection with mechanical properties comparable to traditional pedicle screws. However, clinical results are still reported on limited samples.The study aimed to evaluate perioperative and mid-term follow up outcomes, clinical results and complications in 238 consecutive patients underwent CBT fusion for degenerative lumbosacral disease.Pre- and intraoperative data, clinical outcomes and complications were collected. The patients were stratified in three groups. The original technique was performed in the first 43 cases without a preoperative CT scan planning. The second group includes the patients who underwent preoperative CT scan for entry point and screw trajectory planning (158 patients). Surgical procedures in the last group were performed with patient-matched 3D printed guide (37 patients). The accuracy in screws positioning was evaluated on postoperative CT scan.The mean follow-up was 32.3 months. Mean ODI and VAS index improved with statistical significance. Mean procedural time was 187, 142 and 124 min in the three subgroups. The total amount of recorded complications was 4.2% (16.3%, 3.8% and 0.0% respectively). Screws entirely within the cortex of the pedicle were 78.9%, 90.5% and 93.9% in the three groups. Fusion was obtained in 92.4% of cases.The CBT technique is a safe procedure, especially with an accurate preoperative CT scan-based planning. This seems more evident with the 3D template patient-matched guide. More studies are needed to directly compare traditional pedicle screws and CBT screws on long-term outcomes.     

Design and application of a novel patient-specific 3D printed drill navigational guiding template in percutaneous thoracolumbar pedicle screw fixation: A cadaveric study

The conventional surgical method of percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PPSF) mainly uses X-ray fluoroscopy guidance to target the vertebral pedicle for screw placement. This study aimed to explore the feasibility of establishing a personalized drill guide template for PPSF based on a three-dimensional (3D) printing technique and to evaluate the accuracy and safety of the method for assisting screw insertion in cadaveric specimens. The T3-L3 trunk cadaveric specimens from six adults were subject to a computed tomography (CT) scan in the prone position. A three-dimensional model containing the back skin contour was reconstructed. A bilateral ideal pedicle screw in the T6-L1 segment was designed. Then, the reverse templates were designed. The two templates were fused and printed into an individualized guide template. PPSF was performed under the assistance of the guide template, and the CT scan was taken postoperatively to access the screw position. Ninety-six pedicle screws were successfully placed on the bilateral vertebral body of the T6-L1 segment with the assistance of a guide template. The guide plate was not loosened or displaced when operated by a single hand, and the operation time was 24.6 ± 7.9 s. The axial CT images after puncture indicated that in 96 puncture needles, 90 needles were grade I and 6 were grade II, with a puncture accuracy rate of 98.6%. In conclusion, an individualized PPSF navigation template was developed using Mimics software and 3D printing prototyping, which improved the accuracy of PPSF in cadaveric specimens.     

Routine spinal navigation for thoraco–lumbar pedicle screw insertion using the O-arm three-dimensional imaging system improves placement accuracy

Modern image-guided spinal navigation employs high-quality intra-operative three dimensional (3D) images to improve the accuracy of spinal surgery. This study aimed to assess the accuracy of thoraco-lumbar pedicle screw insertion using the O-arm (Breakaway Imaging, LLC, Littleton, MA, USA) 3D imaging system. Ninety-two patients underwent insertion of thoraco–lumbar pedicle screws guided by O-arm navigation over a 27 month period. Intra-operative scans were retrospectively reviewed for pedicle breach. The operative time of patients where O-arm navigation was used was compared to a matched control group where fluoroscopy was used. A total of 467 pedicle screws were inserted. Four hundred and forty-five screws (95.3%) were placed within the pedicle without any breach (Gertzbein classification grade 0). Sixteen screws (3.4%) had a pedicle breach of less than 2 mm (Gertzbein classification grade 1), and six screws (1.3%) had a pedicle breach between 2 mm and 4 mm (Gertzbein classification grade 2). The grade 2 screws were revised intra-operatively. There was no incidence of neurovascular injury in this series of patients. The mean operative time for O-arm patients was 5.25 hours. In a matched control group of fluoroscopy patients, the mean operative time was 4.75 hours. The difference in the mean operative time between the two groups was not statistically significant (p = 0.15, paired t-test). Stereotactic navigation based on intra-operative O-arm 3D imaging resulted in high accuracy in thoraco–lumbar pedicle screw insertion.     

Cervical Pedicle Screw Insertion Using the Technique with Direct Exposure of the Pedicle by Laminoforaminotomy

Objective

To present the accuracy and safety of cervical pedicle screw insertion using the technique with direct exposure of the pedicle by laminoforaminotomy.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 12 consecutive patients. A total of 104 subaxial cervical pedicle screws in 12 patients had been inserted. We also assessed the clinical and radiological outcomes and analyzed the direction and grade of pedicle perforation (grade 0: no perforation, 1: <25%, 2: 20% to 50%, 3: >50% of screw diameter) on the postoperative vascular-enhanced computed tomography scans. Grade 2 and 3 were considered as incorrect position.

Results

The correct position was found in 95 screws (91.3%); grade 0-75 screws, grade 1-20 screws and the incorrect position in 9 screws (8.7%); grade 2-6 screws, grade 3-3 screws. There was no neurovascular complication related with cervical pedicle screw insertion.

Conclusion

This technique (technique with direct exposure of the pedicle by laminoforaminotomy) could be considered relatively safe and easy method to insert cervical pedicle screw.     

术中CT辅助下椎弓根螺钉置入的精确性和安全性评估

目的 评估术中CT辅助下椎弓根固定技术的安全性和准确性。方法 回顾性分析2014年5月至2015年5月术中CT辅助下椎弓根固定手术治疗的39例脊柱脊髓疾病患者的临床资料,其中脊柱脊髓损伤6例,颅颈交界区畸形6例,脊柱退行性变14例,脊柱脊髓肿瘤13例;术后应用Gertzbein-Robbins分级评价螺钉植入的精确性。结果 椎弓根螺钉固定总数为112枚,术中根据CT影像进行位置修正的螺钉共38枚;其中脊柱脊髓损伤23枚,颅颈交界区畸形8枚,脊柱退行性变40枚,脊柱脊髓肿瘤41枚;颈椎 23枚,胸椎48枚,腰椎41枚。根据Gertzbein-Robbins分级0级105枚,1级5枚,2级2枚。术后发生切口感染4例、脑脊液漏2例、神经损伤1例,未发生与螺钉植入直接相关的并发症,也无二次翻修病例。结论 术中CT能够帮助术者在术中发现位置不良的椎弓根螺钉并对其进行修正,提高椎弓根螺钉植入固定术的精确性和安全性。     

Application of different thresholds for instrumentation device testing in minimally invasive lumbosacral spine fixation

The main aim of this study was evaluating the reliability of stimulus-evoked electromyography (using different thresholds for stimulation of the instrumentation devices) for minimally invasive pedicle screw placement in the lumbosacral spine. A threshold of 5 mA was applied for the pedicle access needle. 7 mA was applied for the tapscrew and pedicle screw stimulation. The existence of threshold differences between vertebral levels was also assessed. All patients underwent postoperative computed tomography (CT) to determine the accuracy of pedicle screw placement. A total of 172 percutaneous pedicle screws were placed in 52 patients. 94.1% of screws were placed at L4, L5 and S1 vertebral levels. No statistically significant differences existed in thresholds of the pedicle access needles, tapscrews and pedicle screws between vertebral levels. In four instances, the pedicle access needle stimulation had a threshold of 5 mA (no breaches were associated). In the rest of occasions, the pedicle access needles had stimulation thresholds above 5 mA. In all instances, tapscrew and pedicle screw thresholds were above 7 mA; the tapscrews and pedicle screws had significantly greater thresholds than the pedicle access needles. No statistically significant differences existed in thresholds between tapscrews and pedicle screws. Postoperative CT imaging revealed one lateral pedicle violation. Both breach rate and false negative rate were 0.5%. No false positive cases were observed. No patients experienced postoperative pedicle screw–related neurologic deficits. A threshold of 5 mA for the pedicle access needle stimulation seems to be safe. Greater than 7 mA should be used for the tapscrew and pedicle screw stimulation.     

Robotics in spine surgery: A systematic review

Robotic systems to assist with pedicle screw placement have recently emerged in the field of spine surgery. Here, the authors systematically reviewed the literature for evidence of these robotic systems and their utility. Thirty-four studies that reported the use of spinal instrumentation with robotic assistance and met inclusion criteria were identified. The outcome measures gathered included: pedicle screw accuracy, indications for surgery, rates of conversion to an alternative surgical method, radiation exposure, and learning curve. In our search there were five different robotic systems identified. All studies reported accuracy and the most commonly used accuracy grading scale was the Gertzbein Robbins scale (GRS). Accuracy of clinically acceptable pedicle screws, defined as < 2 mm cortical breech, ranged from 80% to 100%. Many studies categorized indications for robotic surgery with the most common being degenerative entities. Some studies reported rates of conversion from robotic assistance to manual instrumentation due to many reasons, with robotic failure as the most common. Radiation exposure data revealed a majority of studies reported less radiation using robotic systems. Studies looking at a learning curve effect with surgeon use of robotic assistance were not consistent across the literature. Robotic systems for assistance in spine surgery have continued to improve and the accuracy of pedicle screw placement remains superior when compared to free-hand technique, however rates of manual conversion are significant. Currently, these systems are successfully employed in various pathological entities where trained spine surgeons can be safe and accurate regardless of robotic training.     

Fluoroscopic versus CT-guided cortical bone trajectory pedicle screw fixation: Comparing trajectory related complications

Cortical bone trajectory (CBT) pedicle screw fixation is an emerging technique for treatment of degenerative spine disease which requires either intraoperative fluoroscopy or intraoperative CT guidance (iCT). To date, there has been no direct comparison of these two navigation modalities; here we compare fluoroscopic versus iCT navigation for CBT pedicle screw fixation. We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent CBT screw fixation with either fluoroscopic or iCT guidance for lumbar degenerative disease by the senior author. Trajectory-related complications such as medial or lateral breach were compared on postoperative CT, in addition to the incidence of trajectory-related dural tear. We also compared general surgical complications such as postoperative infection and decompression related durotomies. Thirty-eight patients (19 fluoroscopic, 19 CT-guided) who underwent placement of 182 cortical screws (88 fluoroscopic, 94 CT-guided) were identified. In terms of trajectory-related complications, the iCT cohort had fewer medial breaches (1/94) compared to the fluoroscopic cohort (6/88) (p = 0.05). Each group had one lateral breach (p = 0.73). There was one case of CSF leak from screw placement in the fluoroscopic cohort, but none in the iCT cohort (p = 0.48). Overall, there were eight trajectory-related complications in the fluoroscopic cohort versus two in the iCT cohort (p = 0.04). Our data suggests statistically significant decreased trajectory-related complications with iCT-guided CBT screw fixation as compared to fluoroscopically guided. In terms of general surgical complications, while we observed increased postoperative infections in our fluoroscopic cohort, there was no statistically significant difference.     

Accuracy and Safety in Pedicle Screw Placement in the Thoracic and Lumbar Spines : Comparison Study between Conventional C-Arm Fluoroscopy and Navigation Coupled with O-Arm? Guided Methods

Objective

The authors performed a retrospective study to assess the accuracy and clinical benefits of a navigation coupled with O-arm® system guided method in the thoracic and lumbar spines by comparing with a C-arm fluoroscopy-guided method.

Methods

Under the navigation guidance, 106 pedicle screws inserted from T7 to S1 in 24 patients, and using the fluoroscopy guidance, 204 pedicle screws from T5 to S1 in 45 patients. The position of screws within the pedicle was classified into four groups, from grade 0 (no violation cortex) to 3 (more than 4 mm violation). The location of violated pedicle cortex was also assessed. Intra-operative parameters including time required for preparation of screwing procedure, times for screwing and the number of X-ray shot were assessed in each group.

Results

Grade 0 was observed in 186 (91.2%) screws of the fluoroscopy-guided group, and 99 (93.4%) of the navigation-guided group. Mean time required for inserting a screw was 3.8 minutes in the fluoroscopy-guided group, and 4.5 minutes in the navigation-guided group. Mean time required for preparation of screw placement was 4 minutes in the fluoroscopy-guided group, and 19 minutes in the navigation-guided group. The fluoroscopy-guided group required mean 8.9 times of X-ray shot for each screw placement.

Conclusion

The screw placement under the navigation-guidance coupled with O-arm® system appears to be more accurate and safer than that under the fluoroscopy guidance, although the preparation and screwing time for the navigation-guided surgery is longer than that for the fluoroscopy-guided surgery.     

Pedicle Screw Placement in the Thoracolumbar Spine Using a Novel,Simple, Safe,and Effective Guide-Pin : A Computerized Tomography Analysis

ObjectiveTo improve pedicle screw placement accuracy with minimal radiation and low cost, we developed specially designed K-wire with a marker. To evaluate the accuracy of thoracolumbar pedicle screws placed using the novel guide-pin and portable X-rays.MethodsObservational cohort study with computerized tomography (CT) analysis of in vivo and in vitro pedicle screw placement. Postoperative CT scans of 183 titanium pedicle screws (85 lumbar and 98 thoracic from T1 to L5) placed into 2 cadavers and 18 patients were assessed. A specially designed guide-pin with a marker was inserted into the pedicle to identify the correct starting point (2 mm lateral to the center of the pedicle) and aiming point (center of the pedicle isthmus) in posteroanterior and lateral X-rays. After radiographically confirming the exact starting and aiming points desired, a gearshift was inserted into the pedicle from the starting point into the vertebral body through the center of pedicle isthmus.ResultsNinety-nine percent (181/183) of screws were contained within the pedicle (total 183 pedicle screws : 98 thoracic pedicle screws and 85 lumbar screws). Only two of 183 (1.0%) thoracic pedicle screws demonstrated breach (1 lateral in a patient and 1 medial in a cadaver specimen). None of the pedicle breaches were associated with neurologic or other clinical sequelae.ConclusionA simple, specially designed guide-pin with portable X-rays can provide correct starting and aiming points and allows for accurate pedicle screw placement without preoperative CT scan and intraoperative fluoroscopic assistance.     

Instrumentation Report An endoscopic pedicle probe: Preliminary development

Abstract

Insertion ofpedicle screws in the thoracolumbar spine can be challenging. Incorrect placement can lead to a failure. of fusion or to significant neurologic morbidity. Recently, techniques utilizing intraoperative monitoring and stereotaxis have been developed to achieve proper screw placement. While these techniques may be accurate, they are expensive and may reqLiire additional operating room personnel. We have developed an endoscopic pedicle probe for placement of pedicle screws that may overcome some of these limitations. A small 1.2 mm endoscope was adapted to fit within a hollow pedicle probe. Irrigation was provided via a separate channel within the endoscope. Images from the probe were displayed. both 6n a monitor screen and on a heads up display. The endoscopic pfobe was used to probe 3.6 sawbqne andc22 cadaver thoracolumbar pedicles. After cannulation each specimen was examined to assess Sanvisualized pedicle perforation. In sawbones, perforation was visualized endoscopically in 3 pedicles (8%) with no further perforations found on later direct examination. In cadavers the corticar ca(1cellous interface Was adequately visualized and no perforations occurred. These preliminary results suggest that the endoscopic probe may have utility in the placement of thoracolumbar pedicle screws. [Neurol Res 1997; 19: 657-661]     

Neurovascular complications of cervical pedicle screw fixation

We rarely use the cervical transpedicular fixation (CPF) technique in the neurosurgery departments of the authors' institutions because the pedicle is thin and there is a risk of neurovascular damage. In this study we investigated postoperative neurovascular injury caused by the transpedicular screws of 210 pedicles in 45 patients on whom we performed CPF for various cervical pathologies. Fixation was performed between C3 and C7, and the iliac crest and lamina were used as autografts for fusion. In 205 of 210 pedicles (97.6%), the screws were in the correct position, while a non-critical lateral orientation was detected in three pedicles (1.4%). Two screws (one in each of two patients) were positioned inappropriately (0.9%, Grade 3), unilaterally and directly in the vertebral foramen, as shown on postoperative CT scans; blood circulation was normal on angiography. The fusion rate was 100%. The average screw length used for C3 to C7 was 32 mm. The patients were followed up for an average of 35.7 months (range: 17-60 months). There was no morbidity or mortality in our study. We concluded that CPF provides very strong cervical spine fixation but also carries a risk of pedicle perforation without neurovascular injury. However, a free-hand technique performed by an experienced surgeon is acceptable for CPF for various cervical pathologies.     

神经导航在脊柱固定手术中的应用

目的：探讨应用神经导航系统进行椎弓根螺钉植入的优越性及近期疗效。方法在神经导航辅助下,对17例病人植入76枚椎弓根螺钉,记录单个椎体注册时间、钉道准备时间、术中出血量、术中“C”型臂照射次数、导航精度、术中螺钉重植次数及术后并发症;术后行CT检查评价椎弓根螺钉位置。结果平均单个椎体注册时间（6.3±2.1） min,平均钉道准备时间（2.6±1.3） min,平均术中出血量（253±70） ml;平均“C”型臂照射次数（3.5±0.5）;平均导航精度（0.9±0.1） mm。根据Richter法评估螺钉植入位置：优70枚,良5枚,差1枚;优良率98.68%。术中重植螺钉4枚,重植率5.26%。10例病人随访3～7个月,均无明显神经系统阳性体征。结论在神经导航辅助下,术者可以实时监测螺钉植入过程,前瞻性地判断植入椎弓根螺钉的大小、位置,使椎弓根螺钉植入有较高的准确性和安全性。     

Localization of the trunk muscles using musculoskeletal ultrasound guidance for pedicle screw stimulation during spine surgery

The precise placement of recording electrodes at the relevant myotome is mandatory while performing pedicle screw stimulation (PSS) during spine surgery; however, their placement at trunk muscles is challenging. This study aimed to determine whether ultrasound guidance is useful for trunk muscle localization for PSS during spine surgery. A retrospective clinical study was conducted from a prospective database. Eighty-four patients eligible for spine surgery were recruited. Ultrasound was used to localize the intercostal, rectus abdominis, and internal oblique and psoas muscles if pedicle screw placement was performed at T3 to L1. After the operation, patients were examined for any new neurological deficits related to this procedure, and computed tomography was performed to check screw position if indicated. Four to 22 pedicle screws were used for spinal fixation. The threshold of stimulus to obtain a compound muscle action potential ranged from 1.29 to >20 mA during PSS. Six of our patients sustained new postoperative deficits, and only one case was related directly to pedicel screw misplacement. Loss of motor evoked potential (MEP) over both the lower limbs was noted during pedicle screw placement, and the stimulus threshold during PSS were 1.29 mA at the left T9 and 3.8 mA at the right T5 level. MEP remained absent at the end of surgery despite removal of those two screws. The patient woke with significant weakness in both lower limbs (muscle power 0/0) and voiding difficulty. Fortunately, he regained walking ability 4.5 months later after intensive rehabilitation therapy.     

True accuracy of percutaneous pedicle screw placement in thoracic and lumbar spinal fixation with a CT-based navigation system: Intraoperative and postoperative assessment of 763 percutaneous pedicle screws

PurposeTo investigate intraoperative reinsertion of percutaneous pedicle screw (PPS) with intraoperative CT-based navigation and to evaluate the rate of deviation of PPS at postoperative radiographic examination.MethodsSeven hundred sixty-three screws were inserted in 138 patients. We investigated the rate of occurrence of intraoperative PPS reinsertion after the diagnosis of screw deviation by fluoroscopy and the causes of each screw deviation. The subsequent distribution of PPS deviation was evaluated by postoperative CT. We also assess the difference in variance between the group judged to be PPS misplaced intra-/postoperatively (IOD group/POD group) and appropriate PPS placement (ND group).ResultsAmong all the screws inserted, 10 (1.3%) were diagnosed as being deviated by fluoroscopy during surgery, and 74 (9.7%) screws were found to be deviated at postoperative CT evaluation. We found more pedicle screw mismatch in the POD group than in the ND group (52.7 vs 11.0%, P < 0.001). The distance between the screw and the reference was greater in the IOD group than that in the ND group (1.4 ± 1.2 vs 2.4 ± 1.1 vertebral levels, P = 0.016). In one patient in the IOD group, a motor function deficit was observed postoperatively.ConclusionPPS fixation under intraoperative CT-based navigation did not prevent screw deviation completely. It is necessary to consider errors that occur during surgery and to confirm placement with real-time assistance such as fluoroscopy even in a surgery performed under CT navigation assistance.     

Fijación lumbar posterior empleando el sistema de imagen quirúrgica O-arm: experiencia inicial

ObjectThe use of transpedicular screw fixation has been widely accepted for the treatment of degenerative and traumatic pathology of the lumbar spine. Complications of spinal instrumentation can be serious. Screw misplacement can result in unintended durotomy, nerve root and/or cauda equina injury. In comparison to fluoroscopy-assisted screw placement, computer-assisted image guidance has been shown to achieve overall higher rates of accuracy. The O-arm is able to obtain computed tomography (CT)-type images with multiplanar reconstruction. In this study we evaluated a cohort of patients who underwent posterior lumbar fusion with pedicle screws utilizing the O-arm imaging system.MethodsA retrospective review of 40 consecutive patients who underwent posterior lumbar fusion surgery with O-arm utilization, was performed. The study population included 14 males and 26 females. Age range was 39-85 years with an average of 63.8 years. Twenty one patients had degenerative lumbar stenosis (52.5%) and 19 had spondylolisthesis (47.5%). Intraoperative CT-images were obtained. The mean time for surgery and screw placement was assessed.ResultsA total of 252 pedicle screws were sited using O-arm navigation system, with a mean of 6.3 screws per patient (range 4-10). On the basis of intraoperative CT, 3 screws were redirected, representing a 98.81% accuracy rate.The mean duration of surgery was 157.2 (90-240) minutes and the mean time for screw placement was 7.13 (3.08-15) minutes per screw.Three patients (7.5%) developed superficial wound infections which were treated conservatively. No patients required a return to the operating room because of screw malposition.ConclusionThe use of intraoperative O-arm imaging system with computer-assisted navigation significantly increases the surgical accuracy and safety of pedicle screw placement in lumbar fusion surgery.     

New generation intraoperative three-dimensional imaging (O-arm) in 100 spine surgeries: Does it change the surgical procedure?

The O-arm (Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc., Memphis, TN, USA), an intraoperative CT scan imaging system, may provide high-quality imaging information to the surgeon. To our knowledge, its impact on spine surgery has not been studied. We reviewed 100 consecutive spine surgical procedures which utilized the new generation mobile intraoperative CT imaging system (O-arm). The most common diagnoses were degenerative conditions (disk disease, spondylolisthesis, stenosis and acquired kyphosis), seen in 49 patients. The most common indication for imaging was spinal instrumentation in 81 patients (74 utilized pedicle screws). In 52 (70%) of these, the O-arm was used to assess screw position after placement; in 22 (30%), it was coupled with Stealth navigation (Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc.) to guide screw placement. Another indication was to assess adequacy of spinal decompression in 38 patients; in 19 (50%) of these, intrathecal contrast material was used to obtain an intraoperative CT myelogram. In 20 patients O-arm findings led to direct surgeon intervention in the form of screw removal/repositioning (n = 13), further decompression (n = 6), interbody spacer repositioning (n = 1), and removal of kyphoplasty trocar (n = 1). In 20% of spine surgeries, the procedure was changed based on O-arm imaging findings. We found the O-arm to be useful for assessment of instrumentation position, adequacy of spinal decompression, and confirmation of balloon containment and cement filling in kyphoplasty. When used with navigation for image-guided surgery, it obviated the need for registration.