Oral daily ibandronate prevents bone loss in early postmenopausal women without osteoporosis.

Oral daily ibandronate was investigated for the prevention of bone loss in postmenopausal women without osteoporosis (n = 653). BMD at the lumbar spine and hip were significantly increased (3.1% and 1.8%, respectively; p < or = 0.0001 versus placebo) with 2.5 mg ibandronate after 24 months. Oral ibandronate is a promising option for the prevention of postmenopausal bone loss. INTRODUCTION: Further strategies to manage patients most at risk from developing postmenopausal osteoporosis are required. The objectives of this multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study were to examine the efficacy, tolerability, and optimal dose of oral daily ibandronate in the prevention of bone loss in postmenopausal women. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total, 653 women (mean bone mineral density [BMD] T-score > -2.5 at the lumbar spine), who had been postmenopausal for at least 1 year, were allocated to one of four strata based on time since menopause and baseline lumbar spine BMD. Women were randomized to receive calcium (500 mg daily) plus either placebo (n = 162) or ibandronate 0.5 mg (n = 162), 1 mg (n = 166), or 2.5 mg (n = 163) as once-daily oral treatment for 2 years. The primary endpoint was the mean percent change in lumbar spine BMD with ibandronate versus placebo. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: After 2 years, oral daily ibandronate produced a dose-related and sustained maintenance or increase in BMD at the lumbar spine and hip (total hip, femoral neck, trochanter), together with a dose-related reduction in the rate of bone turnover. The greatest nominal increases in spinal and hip BMD were observed with the 2.5-mg dose, which produced statistically significant BMD gains compared with placebo at 6 months and all subsequent time-points at the spine and hip (3.1% and 1.8% increase in lumbar spine and total hip BMD, respectively, versus placebo; p < or = 0.0001 after 24 months). Oral daily ibandronate was well tolerated with an incidence of upper gastrointestinal adverse events similar to placebo. No safety concerns were identified. In summary, oral daily ibandronate 2.5 mg decreases bone turnover, preserves or increases BMD in the spine and proximal femur, and is well tolerated. Oral ibandronate provides a promising option for the prevention of bone loss in postmenopausal women.     

Insufficiently dosed intravenous ibandronate injections are associated with suboptimal antifracture efficacy in postmenopausal osteoporosis

Less frequent bisphosphonate dosing in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis has the potential to promote therapy adherence through improved convenience. Ibandronate is a highly potent nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate, proven to significantly increase vertebral and nonvertebral bone mineral density (BMD) when administered as a convenient intravenous injection. A recent double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized phase III study explored the antifracture efficacy and safety of 1 and 0.5 mg iv ibandronate injections, given once every 3 months, in 2862 women (55-76 years) with postmenopausal osteoporosis [one to four prevalent vertebral fractures and lumbar spine (L1-L4) BMD T score of less than -2.0 and greater than -5.0 in >or=1 vertebra]. All participants received daily vitamin D (400 IU) and calcium (500 mg) supplementation. The primary endpoint was the incidence of new morphometric vertebral fractures after 3 years. However, although a consistent trend toward a reduction in the incidence of new morphometric vertebral fracture was observed in the active treatment arms compared with placebo (9.2% vs. 8.7% vs. 10.7% in the 1 mg, 0.5 mg and placebo groups, respectively), as well as in the incidence of nonvertebral and hip fractures, the magnitude of fracture reduction was suboptimal and was insufficient to achieve statistical significance. At the studied doses, intravenous ibandronate injections also produced dose-dependent, but comparatively small, increases in lumbar spine BMD (4.0% and 2.9%, respectively) and decreases in biochemical markers of bone resorption and formation, relative to placebo. Optimal fracture efficacy likely requires more substantial increases in BMD and more pronounced suppression of bone turnover. In light of the clear dose-response relationship observed in this and other studies, this is likely to be achieved with higher intravenous doses of ibandronate. The results of a recent phase II/III study (Intermittent Regimen Intravenous Ibandronate Study: the IRIS study) provide support for this hypothesis.     

Monthly oral ibandronate therapy in postmenopausal osteoporosis: 1-year results from the MOBILE study.

Once-monthly (50/50, 100, and 150 mg) and daily (2.5 mg; 3-year vertebral fracture risk reduction: 52%) oral ibandronate regimens were compared in 1609 women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. At least equivalent efficacy and similar safety and tolerability were shown after 1 year. INTRODUCTION: Suboptimal adherence to daily and weekly oral bisphosphonates can potentially compromise therapeutic outcomes in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Although yet to be prospectively shown in osteoporosis, evidence from randomized clinical trials in several other chronic conditions shows that reducing dosing frequency enhances therapeutic adherence. Ibandronate is a new and potent bisphosphonate with antifracture efficacy proven for daily administration and also intermittent administration with a dose-free interval of >2 months. This report presents comparative data on the efficacy and safety of monthly and daily oral ibandronate regimens. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MOBILE is a 2-year, randomized, double-blind, phase III, noninferiority trial. A total of 1609 women with postmenopausal osteoporosis were assigned to one of four oral ibandronate regimens: 2.5 mg daily, 50 mg/50 mg monthly (single doses, consecutive days), 100 mg monthly, or 150 mg monthly. RESULTS: After 1 year, lumbar spine BMD increased by 3.9%, 4.3%, 4.1%, and 4.9% in the 2.5, 50 /50, 100, and 150 mg arms, respectively. All monthly regimens were proven noninferior, and the 150 mg regimen superior, to the daily regimen. All monthly regimens produced similar hip BMD gains, which were larger than those with the daily regimen. All regimens similarly decreased serum levels of C-telopeptide, a biochemical marker of bone resorption. Compared with the daily regimen, a significantly larger proportion of women receiving the 100 and 150 mg monthly regimens achieved predefined threshold levels for percent change from baseline in lumbar spine (6%) or total hip BMD (3%). All regimens were similarly well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Monthly ibandronate is at least as effective and well tolerated as the currently approved daily ibandronate regimen in postmenopausal osteoporosis.     

A 1‐Year Randomized,Double‐Blind,Placebo‐Controlled Study of Intravenous Ibandronate on Bone Loss Following Renal Transplantation

The clinical profile of ibandronate as add‐on to calcitriol and calcium was studied in this double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial of 129 renal transplant recipients with early stable renal function (≤ 28 days posttransplantation, GFR ≥ 30 mL/min). Patients were randomized to receive i.v. ibandronate 3 mg or i.v. placebo every 3 months for 12 months on top of oral calcitriol 0.25 mcg/day and calcium 500 mg b.i.d. At baseline, 10 weeks and 12 months bone mineral density (BMD) and biochemical markers of bone turnover were measured. The primary endpoint, relative change in BMD for the lumbar spine from baseline to 12 months was not different, +1.5% for ibandronate versus +0.5% for placebo (p = 0.28). Ibandronate demonstrated a significant improvement of BMD in total femur, +1.3% versus ?0.5% (p = 0.01) and in the ultradistal radius, +0.6% versus ?1.9% (p = 0.039). Bone formation markers were reduced by ibandronate, whereas the bone resorption marker, NTX, was reduced in both groups. Calcium and calcitriol supplementation alone showed an excellent efficacy and safety profile, virtually maintaining BMD without any loss over 12 months after renal transplantation, whereas adding ibandronate significantly improved BMD in total femur and ultradistal radius, and also suppressed biomarkers of bone turnover. Ibandronate was also well tolerated.     

Efficacy of monthly oral ibandronate is sustained over 5 years: the MOBILE long-term extension study

Summary

The long-term efficacy and safety of once-monthly ibandronate were studied in this extension to the 2-year Monthly Oral Ibandronate in Ladies (MOBILE) trial. Over 5?years, lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) increased from baseline with monthly ibandronate 150?mg (8.4%). Long-term monthly ibandronate is effective and well tolerated for up to 5?years in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Introduction

Once-monthly therapy with ibandronate has been studied for up to 5?years in a long-term extension (LTE) to the 2?year MOBILE trial.

Methods

This multicenter, double-blind extension study of monthly ibandronate involved postmenopausal women who had completed 2?years of the MOBILE core study, with ≥75% adherence. Patients were reallocated, or were randomized from daily therapy, to ibandronate 100?mg monthly or 150?mg monthly for a further 3?years.

Results

A pooled intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis of 344 patients receiving monthly ibandronate from the core MOBILE baseline showed increases over 5?years in lumbar spine BMD (8.2% with 100?mg and 8.4% with 150?mg). Three-year data relative to MOBILE LTE baseline in the full ITT population of all 698 patients randomized or reallocated from MOBILE (including those previously on daily treatment) showed, on average, maintenance of proximal femur BMD gains achieved in the core 2-year study, with further small gains in lumbar spine BMD. In general, maintenance of efficacy was also indicated by markers of bone metabolism.

Conclusions

There were no tolerability concerns or new safety signals. Monthly treatment with ibandronate 100 and 150?mg is effective and well tolerated for up to 5?years in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis.     

Infusion of ibandronate once every 3 months effectively decreases bone resorption markers and increases bone mineral density in Chinese postmenopausal osteoporotic women: a 1-year study

The efficacy and safety of intravenous ibandronate were evaluated in postmenopausal osteoporosis women in China. In this multicenter, positive drug-controlled study, 158 postmenopausal osteoporotic women were randomized to receive 2 mg ibandronate given intravenously once every 3 months or 70 mg alendronate given orally once per week. All women also received supplemental calcium (500 mg) and vitamin D (200 IU) daily. One hundred fifty-one patients completed the 1-year study. Ibandronate produced mean increases in bone mineral density (BMD) by 4.27% at the lumbar spine, 3.48% at the femoral neck, and 2.03% at the trochanter. Mean increases in BMD by 4.24% at the lumbar spine, 2.72% at the femoral neck, and 2.99% at the trochanter were observed in the alendronate group. No significant difference was found between the two groups in BMD in all sites measured. Significant decreases in serum c-telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) were found in the two groups after 1 and 3 months of treatment, respectively; these serum CTX and ALP levels were then maintained at the decreased levels throughout the study period (12 months). No changes of stature were found in the patients of the two groups. Adverse events were similar in the two groups, except more mild muscle pain was observed in the first month after infusion of ibandronate than with oral alendronate (P < 0.001). The results observed in Chinese patients may support the observation that intravenous ibandronate significantly reduced bone resorption and increased BMD with good tolerance in Chinese postmenopausal osteoporotic women. Use of intravenous ibandronate possibly could potentially improve compliance as compared with other oral bisphosphonates because it may avoid the peptic side effects of oral bisphosphonate.     

Ibandronate: a comparison of oral daily dosing versus intermittent dosing in postmenopausal osteoporosis.

The objective of this study was to compare efficacy and safety of continuous versus intermittent oral dosing of ibandronate. Two hundred forty women aged 55-75 years with postmenopausal osteoporosis were randomized to active treatment or placebo. Similar total doses of ibandronate were provided by treatment regimens with either continuous 2.5 mg of ibandronate daily (n = 81) or intermittent 20 mg of ibandronate every other day for the first 24 days, followed by 9 weeks without active drug (n = 78). The placebo group (total, n = 81) was crossed over after 12 months to receive either continuous (n = 37) or intermittent ibandronate (n = 35). By 24 months, bone mineral density (BMD) had increased significantly relative to baseline in both active treatment groups. The continuous and intermittent groups showed statistically equivalent increases in lumbar spine BMD of +5.64% (+/-0.53) and +5.54% (+/-0.53) and in total hip of +3.35% (+/-0.40) and +3.41% (+/-0.40), respectively (per protocol population). Biochemical markers of bone turnover decreased significantly in both treatment groups. The level of marker suppression was similar, although the intermittent group displayed, as expected, more fluctuation over the treatment period. The frequency of adverse events was similar in the treatment groups. In conclusion, the intermittent and continuous regimens showed equivalent changes in BMD and bone turnover. These results confirm previous preclinical findings indicating that the efficacy of ibandronate depends on the total oral dose given rather than on the dosing schedule. This supports development of new flexible dosing regimens targeted to minimize the frequency of dosing, which are expected to improve convenience and lead to enhanced long-term patient compliance.     

A Randomized,Double‐Blind Phase 2 Clinical Trial of Blosozumab,a Sclerostin Antibody,in Postmenopausal Women with Low Bone Mineral Density

Sclerostin, a SOST protein secreted by osteocytes, negatively regulates formation of mineralized bone matrix and bone mass. We report the results of a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled multicenter phase 2 clinical trial of blosozumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody targeted against sclerostin, in postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density (BMD). Postmenopausal women with a lumbar spine T‐score –2.0 to –3.5, inclusive, were randomized to subcutaneous blosozumab 180 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W), 180 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W), 270 mg Q2W, or matching placebo for 1 year, with calcium and vitamin D. Serial measurements of spine and hip BMD and biochemical markers of bone turnover were performed. Overall, 120 women were enrolled in the study (mean age 65.8 years, mean lumbar spine T‐score –2.8). Blosozumab treatment resulted in statistically significant dose‐related increases in spine, femoral neck, and total hip BMD as compared with placebo. In the highest dose group, BMD increases from baseline reached 17.7% at the spine, and 6.2% at the total hip. Biochemical markers of bone formation increased rapidly during blosozumab treatment, and trended toward pretreatment levels by study end. However, bone specific alkaline phosphatase remained higher than placebo at study end in the highest‐dose group. CTx, a biochemical marker of bone resorption, decreased early in blosozumab treatment to a concentration less than that of the placebo group by 2 weeks, and remained reduced throughout blosozumab treatment. Mild injection site reactions were reported more frequently with blosozumab than placebo. In conclusion, treatment of postmenopausal women with an antibody targeted against sclerostin resulted in substantial increases in spine and hip BMD. These results support further study of blosozumab as a potential anabolic therapy for osteoporosis. © 2014 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR)     

Effective and rapid treatment of painful localized transient osteoporosis (bone marrow edema) with intravenous ibandronate

Localized transient osteoporosis (LTO; bone marrow edema syndrome) is a rare disorder of generally unknown etiology that is characterized by acute onset of disabling bone pain. Treatment options are currently limited and largely ineffective. The locally increased bone turnover and low bone mineral density (BMD) typical of LTO indicate a potential role for bisphosphonate therapy. Ibandronate, a potent nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate, has proven efficacy in the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis and corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis when administered as a convenient intermittent intravenous (IV) injection with a between-dose interval of 2 or 3 months. In a study of 12 patients with LTO, ibandronate was administered as an initial 4-mg IV dose with a second, optional injection of 2 mg at 3 months. Daily calcium and vitamin D supplements were provided. Pain was measured at baseline and at 1, 2, 3, and 6 months using a visual analog scale (VAS) of 1–10, and BMD was measured at baseline and 6 months. IV ibandronate provided rapid and substantial pain relief. The mean (SD) VAS score decreased from 8.4 (1.3) at baseline to 0.5 (0.7) at 6 months, at which time seven patients had achieved complete pain relief. At 6 months, mean lumbar spine BMD had increased by 4.0% (range –0.8 to 7.7%) in the overall population. IV ibandronate injection affords advantages over currently available oral and IV bisphosphonates and thus offers a promising therapeutic advance in the treatment of LTO.     

Two-year treatment with denosumab (AMG 162) in a randomized phase 2 study of postmenopausal women with low BMD.

Denosumab is a monoclonal antibody to RANKL. In this randomized, placebo-controlled study of 412 postmenopausal women with low BMD, subcutaneous denosumab given every 3 or 6 mo was well tolerated, increased BMD, and decreased bone resorption markers for up to 24 mo. Continued study of denosumab is warranted in the treatment of low BMD in postmenopausal women. INTRODUCTION: Denosumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that inhibits RANKL, a key mediator of osteoclastogenesis and bone remodeling. This prespecified exploratory analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of denosumab through 24 mo in the treatment of postmenopausal women with low BMD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four hundred twelve postmenopausal women with lumbar spine BMD T-scores of -1.8 to -4.0 or femoral neck/total hip T-scores of -1.8 to -3.5 were randomly assigned to receive double-blind, subcutaneous injections of placebo; denosumab 6, 14, or 30 mg every 3 mo; denosumab 14, 60, 100, or 210 mg every 6 mo; or open-label oral alendronate 70 mg once weekly. Outcome measures included BMD at the lumbar spine, total hip, distal one-third radius, and total body; bone turnover markers; and safety. RESULTS: Denosumab increased BMD at all measured skeletal sites and decreased concentrations of bone turnover markers compared with placebo at 24 mo. At the lumbar spine, BMD increases with denosumab ranged from 4.13% to 8.89%. BMD changes with denosumab 30 mg every 3 mo and > or =60 mg every 6 mo were similar to, or in some cases greater than, with alendronate. The incidence of adverse events was similar in the placebo, denosumab, and alendronate treatment groups. Exposure-adjusted adverse events over 2 yr of treatment were similar to those reported during the first year of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In these postmenopausal women with low BMD, treatment with denosumab for 2 yr was associated with sustained increases in BMD and reductions in bone resorption markers compared with placebo.     

The efficacy and tolerability of risedronate on bone mineral density and bone turnover markers in osteoporotic Chinese women: a randomized placebo-controlled study

Osteoporosis has become an important health problem in postmenopausal Asian populations as the prevalence of hip and vertebral fractures in some Asian countries has risen to approach that of Caucasian populations. Risedronate, a pyridinyl-bisphosphonate agent, is a potent inhibitor of bone resorption. Risedronate increases bone mineral density (BMD), reduces markers of bone turnover, and reduces the risk of fractures in Caucasian postmenopausal women. To determine the efficacy and tolerability of risedronate in Chinese, a multicenter, randomized, double blind, placebo controlled study was performed in Hong Kong. Sixty-five (65) postmenopausal osteoporotic Southern Chinese women, aged 67+/-6 years, were randomly assigned to receive either risedronate 5 mg daily (n=31) or placebo (n=34) for 12 months. All women received calcium carbonate 500 mg daily and vitamin D 400 IU daily. Mean baseline BMD T-score at the spine and total hip was -3.4 and -2.6, respectively. A significant increase in spine BMD was already evident at month 3 of risedronate treatment (P<0.001). Risedronate significantly increased BMD and reduced bone turnover markers as compared with placebo. The risedronate group had significant increase in BMD at 12 months at both the spine and hip when compared with the placebo group (L1-4 6.6% vs. 0.4%, P<0.001; total hip 2.7% vs. 0.3, P<0.0001; femoral neck 1.8% vs. 1.1%, P<0.02; trochanter 4% vs. 1.1%, P<0.0001, respectively). Significant changes in urine N-telopeptide (NTx) and serum osteocalcin were evident as early as 1 and 3 months, respectively, with risedronate treatment. No significant changes were seen in both BMD and bone markers in the placebo group. Risedronate was well tolerated without major adverse effects. We conclude that risedronate is an effective and well-tolerated agent for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis in Asian population.     

Parathyroid Hormone(1–84) Treatment of Postmenopausal Women with Low Bone Mass Receiving Hormone Replacement Therapy

Treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO) is based primarily on antiresorptive agents, including hormone replacement therapy (HT). To evaluate whether anabolic therapy together with HT provides additional benefits in the treatment of PMO, we evaluated the effects of parathyroid hormone (PTH) 1-84 in postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density (BMD) who were receiving chronic (>/=6 months) HT. Subjects were randomized to receive 100 mug PTH(1-84) or placebo injections daily for 24 months (n = 90/group). The primary efficacy outcome was change from baseline in lumbar spine BMD. Secondary end points included changes in hip and distal radius BMD, bone turnover markers, and fracture incidence. The study was terminated early following recommendations regarding HT for PMO. At 18 months, the mean increase in lumbar spine BMD was 7.9% for PTH(1-84) subjects vs. 1.5% for those receiving HT alone; between-group differences were significant at 6 months and persisted throughout the study. Lumbar spine BMD increased in 94% of women receiving PTH(1-84) compared to 59% for HT alone. Femoral neck BMD and bone turnover markers were significantly higher in PTH(1-84)-treated subjects, but the changes in total hip and distal radius BMD were not significant. PTH(1-84) treatment was generally well-tolerated, with hypercalciuria, hypercalcemia, nausea, vomiting, and dizziness reported more frequently in the HT + PTH(1-84) group. In conclusion, addition of PTH(1-84) to stable HT produced marked increases in lumbar spine BMD and may represent an additional approach to the treatment of PMO women receiving HT.     

Odanacatib,a cathepsin‐K inhibitor for osteoporosis: A two‐year study in postmenopausal women with low bone density

Cathepsin K, a cysteine protease expressed in osteoclasts, degrades type 1 collagen. Odanacatib selectively and reversibly inhibited cathepsin K and rapidly decreased bone resorption in preclinical and phase I studies. A 1‐year dose‐finding trial with a 1‐year extension on the same treatment assignment was performed in postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density (BMD) to evaluate the safety and efficacy of weekly doses of placebo or 3, 10, 25, or 50 mg of odanacatib on BMD and biomarkers of skeletal remodeling. Women with BMD T‐scores of ?2.0 or less but not less than ?3.5 at the lumbar spine or femoral sites were randomly assigned to receive placebo or one of four doses of odanacatib; all received vitamin D with calcium supplementation as needed. The primary endpoint was percentage change from baseline lumbar spine BMD. Other endpoints included percentage change in BMD at hip and forearm sites, as well as changes in biomarkers of skeletal remodeling. Twenty‐four months of treatment produced progressive dose‐related increases in BMD. With the 50‐mg dose of odanacatib, lumbar spine and total‐hip BMD increased 5.5% and 3.2%, respectively, whereas BMD at these sites was essentially unchanged with placebo (?0.2% and ?0.9%). Biochemical markers of bone turnover exhibited dose‐related changes. The safety and tolerability of odanacatib generally were similar to those of placebo, with no dose‐related trends in any adverse experiences. In summary, 2 years of weekly odanacatib treatment was generally well‐tolerated and increased lumbar spine and total‐hip BMD in a dose‐related manner in postmenopausal women with low BMD. © 2010 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research     

Comparison of the Effect of Denosumab and Alendronate on BMD and Biochemical Markers of Bone Turnover in Postmenopausal Women With Low Bone Mass: A Randomized,Blinded, Phase 3 Trial

Denosumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that inhibits bone resorption by neutralizing RANKL, a key mediator of osteoclast formation, function, and survival. This phase 3, multicenter, double‐blind study compared the efficacy and safety of denosumab with alendronate in postmenopausal women with low bone mass. One thousand one hundred eighty‐nine postmenopausal women with a T‐score ≤ ?2.0 at the lumbar spine or total hip were randomized 1:1 to receive subcutaneous denosumab injections (60 mg every 6 mo [Q6M]) plus oral placebo weekly (n = 594) or oral alendronate weekly (70 mg) plus subcutaneous placebo injections Q6M (n = 595). Changes in BMD were assessed at the total hip, femoral neck, trochanter, lumbar spine, and one‐third radius at 6 and 12 mo and in bone turnover markers at months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12. Safety was evaluated by monitoring adverse events and laboratory values. At the total hip, denosumab significantly increased BMD compared with alendronate at month 12 (3.5% versus 2.6%; p < 0.0001). Furthermore, significantly greater increases in BMD were observed with denosumab treatment at all measured skeletal sites (12‐mo treatment difference: 0.6%, femoral neck; 1.0%, trochanter; 1.1%, lumbar spine; 0.6%, one‐third radius; p ≤ 0.0002 all sites). Denosumab treatment led to significantly greater reduction of bone turnover markers compared with alendronate therapy. Adverse events and laboratory values were similar for denosumab‐ and alendronate‐treated subjects. Denosumab showed significantly larger gains in BMD and greater reduction in bone turnover markers compared with alendronate. The overall safety profile was similar for both treatments.     

Long-term administration of quarterly IV ibandronate is effective and well tolerated in postmenopausal osteoporosis: 5-year data from the DIVA study long-term extension

Summary

Long-term bone mineral density (BMD) gains, bone marker levels, and safety of 3?mg quarterly intravenous (IV) ibandronate were studied in this 3-year extension to the Dosing IntraVenous Administration (DIVA) trial. Quarterly IV ibandronate consistently increased lumbar spine bone mineral density measured with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA-BMD) over 5?years (8.1%) and was well tolerated in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Introduction

Treatment with IV ibandronate regimens, 2?mg bimonthly and 3?mg quarterly, has been studied for up to 5?years in a long-term extension (LTE) to the 2-year DIVA trial.

Methods

DIVA LTE is an open-label extension to a 2-year randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, noninferiority, phase III study (DIVA core). DIVA LTE involved postmenopausal women who had completed 2?years of DIVA core, comparing daily oral and IV ibandronate (≥75% adherence with IV ibandronate in year?2 of DIVA). Patients previously treated with 2?mg bimonthly or 3?mg quarterly IV ibandronate continued on the same regimen; patients who had received 2.5?mg daily oral ibandronate and placebo IV in DIVA core were switched to IV ibandronate.

Results

Pooled analysis of 497 intent-to-treat (ITT) patients receiving IV ibandronate from DIVA core baseline showed consistent increases over 5?years in lumbar spine DXA-BMD (8.4% [95% confidence interval (CI)?=?7.5, 9.3] with 2?mg bimonthly and 8.1% [95% CI?=?7.2, 8.9] with 3?mg quarterly). Three-year data relative to DIVA LTE baseline in the full ITT population (756 patients randomized or reallocated from DIVA, including those previously on daily treatment) showed maintenance of DXA-BMD gains from DIVA core with further gains in lumbar spine DXA-BMD. These benefits are supported by sustained reductions in markers of bone metabolism. No tolerability concerns or new safety signals were observed.

Conclusions

Treatment with IV ibandronate 2?mg bimonthly or 3?mg quarterly is effective and well tolerated for up to 5?years in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis.     

Bone mass continues to increase at the hip after parathyroid hormone treatment is discontinued in glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: results of a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis is the most common secondary cause of osteoporosis. In this 24-month study, we report changes in bone turnover and bone mass after 12 months of daily injections of human parathyroid hormone 1-34 [hPTH(1-34)] and 12 months off treatment in postmenopausal women (mean age, 63 years) with osteoporosis treated with glucocorticoid and hormone replacement therapy. Response to the treatment was assessed with bone mineral density (BMD) measurements of the lumbar spine by quantitative computed tomography (QCT); BMD measurements of the lumbar spine, hip, and forearm by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA); and biochemical markers of bone turnover. The mean (+/-SEM) change in BMD of the lumbar spine by QCT and DXA in the PTH group at 24 months was 45.9+/-6.4% and 12.6+/-2.2% (p < 0.001). The change in total hip and femoral neck BMD was not significant at 12 months but increased to 4.7+/-0.9% (p < 0.01) and 5.2+/-1.3% at 24 months, respectively, as compared with a relatively small change of 1.3+/-0.9% and 2.6+/-1.7% in the estrogen-only group. The mean percent differences in BMD of the lumbar spine by QCT and DXA between the groups at 24 months were 43.1% and 11.9%, respectively (p < 0.001). The mean percent differences over the estrogen-only group in hip BMD were 3.4% for total hip (p < 0.01) and 2.6% for femoral neck at 24 months. Biochemical markers of bone turnover increased to more than 150% during the first 6 months of therapy, remained elevated throughout the 12-month treatment period, and returned to baseline values within 6 months of discontinuing the PTH treatment. These results suggest that PTH dramatically increases bone mass in the lumbar spine and hip in postmenopausal women with glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis who are taking hormone replacement therapy. However, the maximum effect of this anabolic agent on bone mass at the hip after 12 months of treatment requires at least 6-12 months after the PTH treatment is discontinued.     

Daily and intermittent oral ibandronate normalize bone turnover and provide significant reduction in vertebral fracture risk: results from the BONE study

Increasing evidence suggests that a high rate of bone turnover is associated with low bone mineral density (BMD) and is strongly linked to fracture risk. Measurement of biochemical markers of bone turnover is therefore becoming a more widely used endpoint in clinical trials in postmenopausal osteoporosis. This multinational double-blind, fracture-prevention study enrolled 2946 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Patients were randomized to receive placebo or oral ibandronate administered daily (2.5 mg/day) or intermittently (20 mg every other day for 12 doses every 3 months). The primary endpoint was the incidence of new vertebral fractures after 3 years. Secondary outcome measures included changes in the rate of bone turnover as assessed by biochemical markers and increases in spinal and hip BMD. Daily and intermittent oral ibandronate significantly reduced the risk of vertebral fractures by 62% and 50%, respectively, and produced significant and sustained reductions in all the measured biochemical markers of bone turnover. By 3 months, the rate of bone turnover was reduced by approximately 50–60%, and this level of suppression was sustained throughout the remainder of the study. In summary, oral ibandronate, given daily or with a between-dose interval of >2 months, normalizes the rate of bone turnover, provides significant increases in BMD and a marked reduction in the incidence of vertebral fractures. Thus, intermittent ibandronate has potential to become an important alternative to currently licensed bisphosphonates in postmenopausal osteoporosis.     

The efficacy of 48-week oral ibandronate treatment in postmenopausal osteoporosis when taken 30 versus 60 minutes before breakfast

Since effective prevention and treatment of osteoporosis demands a high degree of long-term compliance, optimization of the dosing regimen in terms of efficacy and convenience of drug intake is a critical issue of oral bisphosphonate treatment. The purpose of the present study was to investigate whether the efficacy of the treatment with oral ibandronate, 2.5 mg daily, can be maintained if changing the postdose fast from 60 to 30 min. This was a 48-week, multicenter, open-label, randomized, parallel-group noninferiority study. Subjects were postmenopausal women 55-80 years old with lumbar spine (L1-L4) bone mineral density (BMD) corresponding to a T score < or =2.5. Women were randomly assigned to take 2.5 mg ibandronate exactly 30 or 60 min before breakfast. Lumbar spine and proximal femur (trochanter, femoral neck, total hip) BMD were measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry; serum osteocalcin and creatinine-corrected urinary C-telopeptide of type I collagen (u-CTX/Cr) excretion were measured by ELISA. After 48 weeks of treatment, the relative increase in lumbar spine BMD from baseline in the 30-min fast group was lower than that in the 60-min fast group (3.07% versus 4.95%, one-sided 97.5% CI = -2.89%) such that the prespecified noninferiority criteria were not met. The mean relative increases in BMD at the trochanter (3.04% versus 4.36%), femoral neck (1.82% versus 2.19%), and total hip (2.35% versus 3.21%) in the 30-min fast group were also lower than those in the 60-min fast group. Less suppression of the markers of bone turnover (u-CTX/Cr, -48.5% vs -61.8%; serum osteocalcin, -34.8% vs 43.8%) was observed in the 30-min compared with the 60-min group. In conclusion, if reducing the postdose fasting interval, dose-increase compensation would likely to be required to maintain efficacy of oral ibandronate treatment. Another potential solution for improving the convenience with bisphosphonate treatment is expected from weekly or monthly dosing regimens currently under clinical investigations.     

Multinational, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Trial of the Effects of Alendronate on Bone Density and Fracture Risk in Postmenopausal Women with Low Bone Mass: Results of the FOSIT Study

This randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled trial evaluated the safety, tolerability and effects on bone mineral density (BMD) of alendronate in a large, multinational population of postmenopausal women with low bone mass. At 153 centers in 34 countries, 1908 otherwise healthy, postmenopausal women with lumbar spine BMD 2 standard deviations or more below the premenopausal adult mean were randomly assigned to receive oral alendronate 10 mg (n = 950) or placebo (n = 958) once daily for 1 year. All patients received 500 mg elemental calcium daily. Baseline characteristics of patients in the two treatment groups were similar. At 12 months, mean increases in BMD were significantly (p相似文献   

Dose–response study of denosumab on bone mineral density and bone turnover markers in Japanese postmenopausal women with osteoporosis

Summary  

The efficacy and safety of denosumab were evaluated in Japanese postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Total hip and distal 1/3 radius bone mineral densities (BMDs) were increased, and lumbar spine BMD was increased in magnitude with increasing dose. Bone turnover markers significantly decreased compared with placebo. Denosumab was well tolerated in Japanese subjects.