Knowledge,attitudes, and practices of private sector immunization service providers in Gujarat,India

BackgroundIndia is responsible for 30% of the annual global cohort of unvaccinated children worldwide. Private practitioners provide an estimated 21% of vaccinations in urban centers of India, and are important partners in achieving high vaccination coverage.MethodsWe used an in-person questionnaire and on-site observation to assess knowledge, attitudes, and practices of private immunization service providers regarding delivery of immunization services in the urban settings of Surat and Baroda, in Gujarat, India. We constructed a comprehensive sampling frame of all private physician providers of immunization services in Surat and Baroda cities, by consulting vaccine distributors, local branches of physician associations, and published lists of private medical practitioners. All providers were contacted and asked to participate in the study if they provided immunization services. Data were collected using an in-person structured questionnaire and directly observing practices; one provider in each practice setting was interviewed.ResultsThe response rate was 82% (121/147) in Surat, and 91% (137/151) in Baroda. Of 258 participants 195 (76%) were pediatricians, and 63 (24%) were general practitioners. Practices that were potential missed opportunities for vaccination (MOV) included not strictly following vaccination schedules if there were concerns about ability to pay (45% of practitioners), and not administering more than two injections in the same visit (60%). Only 22% of respondents used a vaccination register to record vaccine doses, and 31% reported vaccine doses administered to the government. Of 237 randomly selected vaccine vials, 18% had expired vaccine vial monitors.ConclusionsQuality of immunization services in Gujarat can be strengthened by providing training and support to private immunization service providers to reduce MOVs and improve quality and safety; other more context specific strategies that should be evaluated may involve giving feedback to providers on quality of services delivered and working through professional societies to adopt standards of practice.     

The introduction of Norplant in Cambodia through the private sector

The objectives of this study are to determine whether Norplant would be an acceptable contraceptive method for Cambodian women, given its technology and the socio-cultural context, and whether it can be delivered by a private sector clinic with good quality care. This is a prospective cohort study of the first 966 acceptors. It was found the one-year continuation rate was 90.5%, there were no pregnancies and client satisfaction was high. In general, Norplant was delivered with high quality of care. Findings indicate that Norplant suits the contraceptive needs of many Cambodian women and is appropriate for their socio-cultural context. Norplant can be introduced, with high quality care, in a private clinic in a developing country.     

Provider-staff discrepancies in reported immunization knowledge and practices

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study was to compare immunization-relevant knowledge, certainty about knowledge, self-efficacy, vested interest, and reported practices of providers and clinical staff in the same clinics. METHODS: A valid and reliable instrument measuring the aforementioned issues was developed and administered to a sample of 50 providers and 60 members of the clinical staff. RESULTS: Providers were significantly more knowledgeable than staff (P < 0.001); however, they were not more certain about their knowledge (P = 0.52) nor were they more confident in their capability to properly immunize all children in their practice (P = 0.10). Providers reported lower vested interest in immunizations than clinical staff (P < 0.05). Both groups were equally likely to immunize a child with a cold. Providers were less likely to defer needed immunizations for a 15-month-old child, and they were more likely to administer multiple injections to an 18-month-old (both P < 0.05). Providers were more likely than staff to immunize during acute and chronic illness visits (both P < 0.001), and both groups were equally likely to immunize during preventive visits. CONCLUSIONS: Discrepancies in reported immunization practices between providers and staff may be a barrier to full immunization.     

Evaluation of immunization practices in Naples-Italy.

This paper reports the results of a survey on vaccination coverage among children born in January 1995 and residing at the beginning of the study (March 1998) in the city of Naples, Italy. The percentages vaccinated, at various times from birth, with oral polio vaccine (OPV), have been compared with those found in a similar survey conducted at the end of 1985 regarding the cohort of children born in June 1983.By the fourth month of life 67% of the 1995 cohort were vaccinated with the first doses of OPV, an increase of about 26% on that found in the 1983 cohort. Similar results were found with the second doses. Among the 1995 cohort 49% were vaccinated with the third dose of OPV within the thirteenth month of life; the corresponding value for the 1983 cohort was 33%.Within the twenty-fourth month of life, in the 1995 cohort, 86% completed the primary cycle of vaccination with OPV; the corresponding figure for the 1983 cohort was 65%. At the end of the third year of life 80% of the 1995 cohort received the fourth dose of OPV. A significant association has been found between socioeconomic status and coverage level.     

Scope and magnitude of private sector financing and provision of immunization in Benin,Malawi and Georgia

BackgroundLittle is known about the role of private sector providers in providing and financing immunization. To fill this gap, the authors conducted a study in Benin, Malawi, and Georgia to estimate (1) the proportion of vaccinations taking place through the private sector; (2) private expenditures for vaccination; and (3) the extent of regulation.MethodsIn each country, the authors surveyed a stratified random sample of 50 private providers (private for-profit and not-for-profit) using a standardized, pre-tested questionnaire administered by trained enumerators. In addition, the authors conducted 300 or more client exit interviews in each country.ResultsThe three countries had different models of private service provision of vaccination. In Malawi, 44% of private facilities, predominantly faith-based organizations, administered an estimated 27% of all vaccinations. In Benin, 18% of private for-profit and not-for-profit facilities provided vaccinations, accounting for 8% of total vaccinations. In Georgia, all sample facilities were privately managed, and conducted 100% of private vaccinations. In all three countries, the Ministries of Health (MoHs) supplied vaccines and other support to private facilities. The study found that 6–76% of clients paid nominal fees for vaccination cards and services, and a small percentage (2–26%) chose to pay higher fees for vaccines not within their countries’ national schedules. The percentage of private expenditure on vaccination was less than 1% of national health expenditures. The case studies revealed that service quality at private facilities was mixed, a finding that is similar to those of other studies on private sector vaccination. The three countries varied in how well the MoHs managed and supervised private sector services.Discussion/ConclusionThe private sector plays a growing role in lower-income countries and is expanding access to services. Governments’ ability to regulate and monitor immunization services and promote quality and affordable services in the private sector should be a priority.     

Role of the private sector in the provision of immunization services in low- and middle-income countries

The authors conducted a literature review on the role of the private sector in low- and middle-income countries. The review indicated that relatively few studies have researched the role of the private sector in immunization service delivery in these countries. The studies suggest that the private sector is playing different roles and functions according to economic development levels, the governance structure and the general presence of the private sector in the health sector. In some countries, generally low-income countries, the private for-profit sector is contributing to immunization service delivery and helping to improve access to traditional EPI vaccines. In other countries, particularly middle-income countries, the private for-profit sector often acts to facilitate early adoption of new vaccines and technologies before introduction and generalization by the public sector. The not-for-profit sector plays an important role in extending access to traditional EPI vaccines, particularly in low-income countries. Not-for-profit facilities are situated in rural as well as urban areas and are more likely to be coordinated with public services than the private for-profit sector. Although numerous studies on non-governmental organizations (NGOs) suggest that the extent of NGO provision of immunization services in low- and middle-income countries is substantial, the contribution of this sector is poorly documented, leading to a lack of recognition of its role at national and global levels. Studies on quality of immunization service provision at private health facilities suggest that it is sometimes inadequate and needs to be monitored. Although some articles on public-private collaboration exist, little was found on the extent to which governments are effectively interacting with and regulating the private sector. The review revealed many geographical and thematic gaps in the literature on the role and regulation of the private sector in the delivery of immunization services in low- and middle-income countries.     

Influenza and pneumococcal immunization in the elderly: knowledge,attitudes, and practices among general practitioners in Italy

The purpose of the study was to evaluate general practitioners' knowledge, attitudes, and behaviours related to influenza and pneumococcal vaccination in the elderly. A random sample of 500 general practitioners in Calabria, Italy, received a questionnaire focusing on demographics and practice characteristics, their knowledge of the main groups to whom influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations were recommended, and attitudes and behaviours relating to disease prevention by influenza and pneumococcal immunization programs. Only 17.1% of the 148 respondents indicated every main group for whom influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations were recommended, whereas 84.5 and 65.5% were aware that influenza and pneumococcal vaccine respectively should be administered to the elderly. Knowledge that the elderly were the likely beneficiaries of both vaccinations was significantly greater in older general practitioners and those with fewer years of professional activity. A positive attitude was reported by a large majority, who believed that these vaccines might reduce the seriousness of influenza (91.2%) and pneumococcal disease (87.9%), as well as the risk of hospitalization (95.2 and 89.2%, respectively). This attitude was significantly more common in those with fewer years of professional activity, those who worked more hours per week, and those who relied on scientific journals as a source of information. Almost all administered or recommended influenza vaccine (95.2%), whereas the use of pneumococcal vaccine was less widespread (46.9%); recommending or administering both vaccines to the elderly was significantly more prevalent in those who knew that this group were the likely beneficiaries of these vaccines. Our study thus showed that there is a great need for efforts to improve general practitioners' knowledge of influenza and pneumococcal vaccines and their adherence to vaccination policies.     

Rapid assessment of injection practices in Cambodia, 2002

Background  

Injection overuse and unsafe injection practices facilitate transmission of bloodborne pathogens such as hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Anecdotal reports of unsafe and unnecessary therapeutic injections and the high prevalence of HBV (8.0%), HCV (6.5%), and HIV (2.6%) infection in Cambodia have raised concern over injection safety. To estimate the magnitude and patterns of such practices, a rapid assessment of injection practices was conducted.