Utility of the combination of serum highly-sensitive C-reactive protein level at discharge and a risk index in predicting readmission for acute exacerbation of COPD

OBJECTIVE:

Frequent readmissions for acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD) are an independent risk factor for increased mortality and use of health-care resources. Disease severity and C-reactive protein (CRP) level are validated predictors of long-term prognosis in such patients. This study investigated the utility of combining serum CRP level with the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) exacerbation risk classification for predicting readmission for AECOPD.

METHODS:

This was a prospective observational study of consecutive patients hospitalized for AECOPD at Peking University Third Hospital, in Beijing, China. We assessed patient age; gender; smoking status and history (pack-years); lung function; AECOPD frequency during the last year; quality of life; GOLD risk category (A-D; D indicating the greatest risk); and serum level of high-sensitivity CRP at discharge (hsCRP-D).

RESULTS:

The final sample comprised 135 patients. Of those, 71 (52.6%) were readmitted at least once during the 12-month follow-up period. The median (interquartile) time to readmission was 78 days (42-178 days). Multivariate analysis revealed that serum hsCRP-D ≥ 3 mg/L and GOLD category D were independent predictors of readmission (hazard ratio = 3.486; 95% CI: 1.968-6.175; p < 0.001 and hazard ratio = 2.201; 95% CI: 1.342-3.610; p = 0.002, respectively). The ordering of the factor combinations by cumulative readmission risk, from highest to lowest, was as follows: hsCRP-D ≥ 3 mg/L and GOLD category D; hsCRP-D ≥ 3 mg/L and GOLD categories A-C; hsCRP-D < 3 mg/L and GOLD category D; hsCRP-D < 3 mg/L and GOLD categories A-C.

CONCLUSIONS:

Serum hsCRP-D and GOLD classification are independent predictors of readmission for AECOPD, and their predictive value increases when they are used in combination.     

Readmission within 30 days of Hospital Discharge among Children Receiving Chronic Dialysis

Background and objectives

The hospital admission rate for children receiving chronic dialysis has been increasing over the last decade. Approximately one third of patients with ESRD age 0–19 years are readmitted to the hospital within 30 days of discharge. The objective of this study was to examine hospital readmissions among a cohort of children receiving chronic dialysis to identify factors associated with higher rates of 30-day readmission.

Design, settings, participants, & measurements

A retrospective cohort of index admissions was developed among chronic dialysis patients age 3 months to 17 years at free-standing children’s hospitals reporting information to the Pediatric Hospital Information System between January 2006 and November 30, 2010, and followed until December 31, 2010. The primary outcome was any-cause 30-day readmission, and the secondary outcome was 30-day readmission for a cause similar to that of the index hospitalization.

Results

In this cohort, 25% of hospital admissions were followed by a readmission within 30 days. Children older than 2 years of age had a lower odds of readmission (odds ratio [OR], 0.6; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.5 to 0.8). Those receiving hemodialysis had a higher risk of readmission (OR, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.0 to 1.4), and admissions >14 days were also more likely to be followed by a readmission (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1 to 2.0). Approximately 50% of the readmissions were for a similar diagnosis as the index admission; however, the specific admitting diagnosis was not associated with readmission.

Conclusions

A significant number of admissions among children receiving long-term dialysis are followed by readmission within 30 days. Further investigation is required to reduce the high rate of readmissions in these children.     

Risk factors and outcomes associated with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations requiring hospitalization

BACKGROUND:

Acute respiratory exacerbations are the most frequent cause of medical visits, hospitalization and death for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients and, thus, exert a significant social and economic burden on society.

OBJECTIVE:

To identify the risk factors associated with hospital readmission(s) for acute exacerbation(s) of COPD (AECOPD).

METHODS:

A review of admission records from three large urban hospitals in Vancouver, British Columbia, identified 310 consecutive patients admitted for an AECOPD between April 1, 2001, and December 31, 2002. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for readmissions following an AECOPD.

RESULTS:

During the study period, 38% of subjects were readmitted at least once. The mean (± SD) duration from the index admission to the first readmission was 5±4.08 months. Comparative analysis among the three hospitals identified a significant difference in readmission rates (54%, 36% and 18%, respectively). Logistic regression analysis revealed that preadmission home oxygen use (OR 2.55; 95%CI 1.45 to 4.42; P=0.001), history of a lung infection within the previous year (OR 1.73; 95% CI 1.01 to 2.97; P=0.048), other chronic respiratory disease (OR 1.78; 95% CI 1.06 to 2.99; P=0.03) and shorter length of hospital stay (OR 0.97; 95% CI 0.945 to 0.995; P=0.021) were independently associated with frequent readmissions for an AECOPD.

CONCLUSIONS:

Hospital readmission rates for AECOPD were high. Only four clinical factors were found to be independently associated with COPD readmission. There was significant variability in the readmission rate among hospitals. This variability may be a result of differences in the patient populations that each hospital serves or may reflect variability in health care delivery at different institutions.     

Integrated interdisciplinary care for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease reduces emergency department visits and admissions: A quality assurance study

BACKGROUND:

Dedicated programs for the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) can reduce hospitalizations and improve quality of life.

OBJECTIVE:

To investigate whether health care utilization could be reduced by a newly developed integrated, interdisciplinary initiative that included a COPD nurse navigator who educates patients and families, transitions patients through various points of care and integrates services.

METHODS:

The present quality assurance, pre-post study included patients followed by a COPD nurse navigator from January 25, 2010 to November 5, 2011. Information regarding emergency department visits and hospitalizations, including lengths of stay, were obtained from hospital databases. Diagnoses were classified as respiratory or nonrespiratory, and used primary and secondary hospitalization diagnoses to identify acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD). Paired sign tests were performed.

RESULTS:

The sample consisted of 202 patients. Following nurse navigator intervention, significantly more patients experienced a decrease in the number of respiratory-cause emergency department visits (P<0.05), number of respiratory hospitalizations (P<0.001), total hospital days for respiratory admissions (P<0.001), number of hospitalizations with AECOPD (P<0.001) and total hospital days for admissions with AECOPD (P<0.001). Financial modelling estimated annual savings in excess of $260,000.

CONCLUSION:

The present quality assurance study indicated that the implementation of an integrated interdisciplinary program for the care of patients with COPD can improve patient outcomes despite the tendency of COPD to worsen over time.     

Hospital Evaluations by Social Media: A Comparative Analysis of Facebook Ratings among Performance Outliers

BACKGROUND

An increasing number of hospitals and health systems utilize social media to allow users to provide feedback and ratings. The correlation between ratings on social media and more conventional hospital quality metrics remains largely unclear, raising concern that healthcare consumers may make decisions on inaccurate or inappropriate information regarding quality.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to examine the extent to which hospitals utilize social media and whether user-generated metrics on Facebook^® correlate with a Hospital Compare^® metric, specifically 30-day all cause unplanned hospital readmission rates.

DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS

This was a retrospective cross-sectional study conducted among all U.S. hospitals performing outside the confidence interval for the national average on 30-day hospital readmission rates as reported on Hospital Compare. Participants were 315 hospitals performing better than U.S. national rate on 30-day readmissions and 364 hospitals performing worse than the U.S. national rate.

MAIN MEASURES

The study analyzed ratings of hospitals on Facebook’s five-star rating scale, 30-day readmission rates, and hospital characteristics including beds, teaching status, urban vs. rural location, and ownership type.

KEY RESULTS

Hospitals performing better than the national average on 30-day readmissions were more likely to use Facebook than lower-performing hospitals (93.3 % vs. 83.5 %; p < 0.01). The average rating for hospitals with low readmission rates (4.15 ± 0.31) was higher than that for hospitals with higher readmission rates (4.05 ± 0.41, p < 0.01). Major teaching hospitals were 14.3 times more likely to be in the high readmission rate group. A one-star increase in Facebook rating was associated with increased odds of the hospital belonging to the low readmission rate group by a factor of 5.0 (CI: 2.6–10.3, p <  0.01), when controlling for hospital characteristics and Facebook-related variables.

CONCLUSIONS

Hospitals with lower rates of 30-day hospital-wide unplanned readmissions have higher ratings on Facebook than hospitals with higher readmission rates. These findings add strength to the concept that aggregate measures of patient satisfaction on social media correlate with more traditionally accepted measures of hospital quality.KEY WORDS: Performance measurement, Patient satisfaction, Consumer health informatics     

Functional Status and Hospital Readmissions Using the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey

BACKGROUND

Hospital readmissions are expensive and they may signal poor quality of care. Whether functional status is related to hospital readmissions using a representative U.S sample remains unexplored .

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to assess the relationship between functional status and all-cause 30-day hospital readmissions using a representative sample of the US population.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective observational study (2003–2011).

PATIENTS

The study included 3,772 patients who completed the SF-12 before being hospitalized. Three hundred and eighteen (8.4 %) were readmitted within 30 days after being discharged.

MEASUREMENTS

The Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) was employed. Functional status was measured with the Short-Form 12-Item Health Survey Version 2® (SF-12). The probability of being readmitted was estimated using a logistic model controlling for demographic characteristics, comorbid conditions, insurance coverage, physical (PCS) and mental (MCS) summaries of the SF-12, reason for hospitalization, length of hospital stay, region, and residential area.

RESULTS

A one-unit difference in PCS reduced the odds of readmission by 2 % (odds ratio 0.98 [95 % CI, 0.97 to 0.99]; p < 0.001), which implies an 18 % reduction in the odds of readmissions for a ten-unit difference (one standard deviation) in PCS. The c-statistic of the model was 0.72.

CONCLUSION

Baseline physical function is associated with hospital readmissions. The SF-12 improves the ability to identify patients at high risk of hospital readmission.KEY WORDS: functional status, physical status, medical expenditure panel survey, hospital admission, readmission     

Readmission incidence and associated factors after a hepatic resection at a major hepato-pancreatico-biliary academic centre

Background

Reducing readmission is a key quality improvement target for policymakers. The purpose of the present study was to define incidence and identify factors associated with readmission after a hepatic resection.

Methods

Thirty-day readmission after discharge and factors associated with a higher risk of readmission were examined among patients undergoing a hepatic resection at Johns Hopkins Hospital between 2008 and 2012.

Results

Among the 338 patients, the median age was 57.9 years and 173 (51.2%) were men. Indications for surgery included colorectal cancer liver metastasis (38.2%), primary hepatic tumours (25.7%) and benign disease (3.3%). Surgical resection consisted of less than a hemi-hepatectomy in the majority of patients (n = 224, 66.3%). The median index hospitalization length-of-stay (LOS) was 5 days; 68.7% patients experienced at least one inpatient complication. Overall 30-day readmission was 14.2% (n = 48). The majority of readmitted patients (n = 46, 95.8%) had a complication prior to readmission. The median LOS for readmission was 4 [interquartile range (IQR) 2–6] days. On multivariable analysis, the strongest independent predictor of readmission was the presence of a major complication [odds ratio (OR) 5.30, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.38–11.78, P < 0.001].

Conclusions

Readmission after a hepatic resection occurs in approximately one out of every seven patients. Patients who experience a post-operative complication are greater than five times more likely to be readmitted. Prospective studies are needed to evaluate methods to reduce unplanned readmissions.     

The effect of weekend versus weekday admission on outcomes of esophageal variceal hemorrhage

BACKGROUND

Hospital staffing is often lower on weekends than weekdays, and may contribute to higher mortality in patients admitted on weekends. Because esophageal variceal hemorrhage (EVH) requires complex management and urgent endoscopic intervention, limitations in physician expertise and the availability of endoscopy on weekends may be associated with increased EVH mortality.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the differences in mortality, hospital length of stay (LOS), and costs between patients admitted on weekends versus patients who were admitted on weekdays.

METHODS

The United States Nationwide Inpatient Sample database was used to identify patients hospitalized for EVH between 1998 and 2005. Differences in mortality, LOS, and costs between patients admitted on weekends and weekdays were evaluated using regression models with adjustment for patient and clinical factors, including the timing of endoscopy.

RESULTS

Between 1998 and 2005, 36,734 EVH admissions to 2207 hospitals met the inclusion criteria. Compared with patients admitted on weekdays, individuals admitted on the weekend were slightly less likely to undergo endoscopy on the day of admission (45% versus 43%, respectively; P=0.01) and by the second day (81% versus 75%; P<0.0001). However, mortality (11.3% versus 10.8%; P=0.20) and the requirement for endoscopic therapy (70% versus 69%; P=0.08) or portosystemic shunt insertion (4.4% versus 4.7%; P=0.32) did not differ between weekend and weekday admissions. After adjusting for confounding factors, including the timing of endoscopy, the risk of mortality was similar between weekend and weekday admissions (OR 1.05; 95% CI 0.97 to 1.14). Although LOS was similar between groups, adjusted hospital charges were 4.0% greater (95% CI 2.3 to 5.8%) for patients hospitalized on the weekend.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with EVH, admission on the weekend is associated with a small delay in receiving endoscopic intervention, but no difference in mortality or the requirement for portosystemic shunt insertion. The weekend effect observed for some medical and surgical conditions does not apply to patients with EVH.     

The effect of place of residence on access to invasive cardiac services following acute myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND:

The Canadian health care system is mandated to provide reasonable access to health care for all Canadians regardless of age, sex, race, socioeconomic status or place of residence. In the present study, the impact of place of residence in Nova Scotia on access to cardiac catheterization and long-term outcomes following an acute myocardial infarction (MI) were examined.

METHODS:

All patients with an acute MI who were hospitalized between April 1998 and December 2001 were identified. Place of residence was defined by postal code and separated into three categories: metropolitan area (MA); nonmetropolitan urban area (UA); and rural area (RA). Rates of and waiting times for cardiac catheterization were determined, as were risk-adjusted long-term rates of mortality and readmission to the hospital.

RESULTS:

A total of 7351 patients were hospitalized with an acute MI during the study period. Rates of cardiac catheterization differed across the three groups (MA 45.6%, UA 37.3%, RA 37.3%; P<0.0001), as did mean waiting times (MA 15.0 days, UA 32.1 days, RA 28.7 days) (P<0.0001). After adjusting for differences among patients, residence in either UA or RA emerged as an independent predictor of lower rates of cardiac catheterization (UA: hazard ratio [HR] 0.77, P<0.0001; RA: HR 0.75, P<0.0001), greater waiting times (UA: an additional 14.1 days, P<0.0001; RA: an additional 10.8 days, P<0.0001) and increased long-term rates of readmission (UA: HR 1.24, P=0.0001; RA: HR 1.12, P=0.04).

CONCLUSION:

In patients admitted with an acute MI, residence outside of an MA was associated with diminished rates of cardiac catheterization, longer waiting times and increased rates of readmission. Despite universal health care coverage, Canadians are subject to significant geographical barriers to cardiac catheterization with associated poorer outcomes.     

New bundled world: quality of care and readmission in diabetes patients

Background

Hospital readmissions among patients with diabetes are substantial and costly. Although prior studies have shown that receipt of outpatient quality of care significantly reduces the risk of hospitalization among patients with diabetes, little is known about its impact on hospital readmission. The objective of this study is to assess the impact of outpatient quality of care on 30-day readmission among patients with diabetes.

Methods

We used deidentified administrative claims data from the IMS LifeLink and included commercially insured diabetes patients ≥ 19 years old discharged from hospitals in the United States in 2009 and 2010 (n = 30,139). The outcome was readmission within 2–30 days of discharge. The main independent variables were receipt of outpatient quality-of-care measures (i.e., two hemoglobin A1c tests, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) test, 90-day supply of statin, and 90-day supply of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers). Multivariate logistic regression was used to examine the impact of outpatient quality of care on hospital readmission while controlling for demographics, clinical characteristics, health care utilization, and insurance type in the year prior to admission.

Results

Overall 30-day readmission rates among patients with diabetes were 18.9%. Patients who received at least one LDL test [odds ratio (OR) = 0.918, 95% confidence interval (CI; 0.852 0.989), p < .025] and ≥90-day supply of statins (OR = 0.91, 95% CI [0.85 0.97], p < .01) were less likely to be readmitted to the hospital.

Conclusions

Receipt of LDL testing and adherence to statin medications were effective in decreasing the likelihood of 30-day hospital readmission and may be considered as elements of a quality focused incentive-based health care delivery package for diabetes patients.     

A Patient Navigator Intervention to Reduce Hospital Readmissions among High-Risk Safety-Net Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Background

Evidence-based interventions to reduce hospital readmissions may not generalize to resource-constrained safety-net hospitals.

Objective

To determine if an intervention by patient navigators (PNs), hospital-based Community Health Workers, reduces readmissions among high risk, low socioeconomic status patients.

Design

Randomized controlled trial.

Participants

General medicine inpatients having at least one of the following readmission risk factors: (1) age ≥60 years, (2) any in-network inpatient admission within the past 6 months, (3) length of stay ≥3 days, (4) admission diagnosis of heart failure, or (5) chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The analytic sample included 585 intervention patients and 925 controls.

Interventions

PNs provided coaching and assistance in navigating the transition from hospital to home through hospital visits and weekly telephone outreach, supporting patients for 30 days post-discharge with discharge preparation, medication management, scheduling of follow-up appointments, communication with primary care, and symptom management.

Main Measures

The primary outcome was in-network 30-day hospital readmissions. Secondary outcomes included rates of outpatient follow-up. We evaluated outcomes for the entire cohort and stratified by patient age >60 years (425 intervention/584 controls) and ≤60 years (160 intervention/341 controls).

Key Results

Overall, 30-day readmission rates did not differ between intervention and control patients. However, the two age groups demonstrated marked differences. Intervention patients >60 years showed a statistically significant adjusted absolute 4.1 % decrease [95 % CI: −8.0 %, -0.2 %] in readmission with an increase in 30-day outpatient follow-up. Intervention patients ≤60 years showed a statistically significant adjusted absolute 11.8 % increase [95 % CI: 4.4 %, 19.0 %] in readmission with no change in 30-day outpatient follow-up.

Conclusions

A patient navigator intervention among high risk, safety-net patients decreased readmission among older patients while increasing readmissions among younger patients. Care transition strategies should be evaluated among diverse populations, and younger high risk patients may require novel strategies.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11606-015-3185-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.KEY WORDS: care transitions, continuity of care, health care delivery, patient safety, underserved populations     

Paradoxical lower postmyocardial infarction mortality among veteran women – does a sex bias exist in the Veterans Affairs medical system?

BACKGROUND:

Outcomes after acute coronary disease are reportedly worse among women in general and more so among women with diabetes compared with men. Sex differences were evaluated in postmyocardial infarction (MI) mortality among veterans (who are predominantly male) to determine whether evaluation and treatment in Veterans Affairs hospitals amplifies sex differences in outcome.

METHODS:

All patients discharged with the primary diagnosis of acute MI from any Veterans hospitals in the United States between October 1990 and September 1997 were identified. Demographic, comorbidity, inpatient, outpatient, mortality and readmission data were extracted. Mortality, revascularization and readmissions were compared between male and female patients using Cox regression models.

RESULTS:

The authors identified 67,889 patients with MI, 17,756 (26%) of whom had diabetes. There were 951 women, 280 (29%) of whom had diabetes, and 66,938 men, 17,476 (26%) of whom had diabetes. Over the entire follow-up period, adjusted mortality was higher in men than women (hazard ratio [HR] 1.5, 95% CI 1.3 to 1.7). Cardiac procedures were significantly higher among men: HR for coronary bypass surgery was 2.1 (95% CI 1.6 to 2.8; P<0.001) for all men, while HR for catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention were higher for men among non-diabetics only – 1.5 (95% CI 1.2 to 1.8; P<0.001) and 2.0 (95% CI 1.4 to 2.9; P<0.001). Interaction between sex and diabetes was not significant.

CONCLUSIONS:

Contrary to previous observations in the nonveteran population, long-term mortality post-MI was lower among veteran women, despite higher procedure rates in men. The present study also failed to show increased mortality in women with diabetes.     

Mortality of elderly patients in Ontario after hospital admission for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

BACKGROUND:

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is associated with significant mortality. It is currently the fourth leading cause of death in Canada and the world.

OBJECTIVES:

To describe the mortality of elderly patients in Ontario after hospital admission for COPD.

METHODS:

A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the Discharge Abstract Database from the Canadian Institute for Health Information. Patients aged 65 years and older who were admitted to hospital between 2001 and 2004 with primary discharge diagnoses labelled with International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes 491, 492 and 496 were included in the study.

RESULTS:

Mortality rates were 8.81, 12.10, 14.53 and 27.72 per 100 COPD hospital admissions at 30, 60, 90 and 365 days after hospital discharge, respectively. Mortality also increased with age, and men had higher rates than women. No significant differences in mortality rates were found between different socioeconomic groups (P>0.05). Patients with shared care of a family physician or general practitioner and a specialist had significantly lower mortality rates than the overall rate (P<0.05), and their rates were approximately one-half the rate of patients with only one physician.

CONCLUSIONS:

Hospitalization with COPD is associated with significant mortality. Patients who were cared for by both a family physician or general practitioner and a specialist had significantly lower mortality rates than those cared for by only one physician, suggesting that continuous and coordinated care results in better survival.     

Risk factors of hospitalization and readmission of patients with COPD exacerbation �C systematic review

Background:

Chronic obstructive lung disease (COPD) exacerbations are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. Data regarding factors which causes or prevents exacerbations is very limited. The aim of this systematic review is to summarize the results from available studies to identify potential risk factors for hospital admission and/or re-admission among patients experiencing COPD exacerbations.

Methods:

We undertook a systematic review of the literature. Potential studies were identified by searching the electronic databases: PubMed, EMBASE, BIOSIS, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane library, reference lists in trial reports, and other relevant articles.

Results:

Seventeen articles that met the predefined inclusion criteria were identified. Heterogeneity of study designs, risk factors and outcomes restrict the result to only a systematic review and precluded a formal meta-analysis. In this review, three predictive factors: previous hospital admission, dyspnea and oral corticosteroids were all found to be significant risk factors of readmissions and variables including using long term oxygen therapy, having low health status or poor health related quality of life and not having routine physical activity were all associated with an increased risk of both admission and readmission to hospital.

Conclusions:

There are a number of potential modifiable factors that are independently associated with a higher risk of COPD exacerbation requiring admission/readmission to the hospital. Identifying these factors and the development of targeted interventions could potentially reduce the number and severity of such exacerbations.     

Surgical bypass vs. endoscopic stenting for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Background:

The majority of patients with pancreatic cancer are non-resectable and jaundiced at presentation. Methods of palliation in such patients with locally advanced disease comprise endoscopic placement of a biliary endoprosthesis or surgical bypass.

Methods:

This retrospective study compared morbidity, mortality, hospital stay, readmission rate and survival in consecutive patients with incurable locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Results:

We identified a total of 56 patients, of whom 33 underwent endoscopic stenting and 23 underwent a surgical bypass consisting of a hepaticojejunostomy-en-Y and a gastrojejunostomy. There were no significant differences in complication or mortality rates between patients undergoing palliative stenting and those undergoing palliative surgery. However, after excluding admissions for chemotherapy-related problems, the number of readmissions expressed as a percentage of the group population size was greater in stented patients compared with biliary bypass patients (39.4% vs. 13.0%, respectively; P < 0.05). Overall survival amongst patients undergoing palliative bypass was significantly greater than in stented patients (382 days vs. 135 days, respectively; P < 0.05).

Conclusions:

On analysis of these data and the published literature, we conclude that surgical bypass represents an effective method of palliation for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Patients need to be carefully selected with regard to both operative risk and perceived overall survival.     

Professional Language Interpretation and Inpatient Length of Stay and Readmission Rates

Background

The population of persons seeking medical care is linguistically diverse in the United States. Language barriers can adversely affect a patient’s ability to explain their symptoms. Among hospitalized patients, these barriers may lead to higher readmission rates and longer hospitalizations. Trained interpreters help overcome communication barriers; however, interpreter usage among patients is suboptimal.

Objective

To investigate differences among patients with limited English proficiency (LEP) in their length of stay (LOS) and 30-day readmission rate associated with their receiving professional interpretation at admission or discharge.

Design

We analyzed the rates of interpretation at admission and discharge of all LEP patients admitted to a tertiary care hospital over a three-year period. We calculated length of stay in days and as log of LOS. We also examined 30-day readmission. Using multivariable regression models, we explored differences among patients who received interpretation at admission, discharge, or both, controlling for patient characteristics, including age, illness severity, language, and gender.

Participants

All LEP patients admitted between May 1, 2004 and April 30, 2007.

Main Measures

Length of hospital stay as related to use of professional interpreters; readmission to the hospital within 30 days.

Key Results

Of the 3071 patients included in the study, 39 % received language interpretation on both admission and discharge date. Patients who did not receive professional interpretation at admission or both admission/discharge had an increase in their LOS of between 0.75 and 1.47 days, compared to patients who had an interpreter on both day of admission and discharge (P < 0.02). Patients receiving interpretation at admission and/or discharge were less likely than patients receiving no interpretation to be readmitted with 30 days.

Conclusions

The length of a hospital stay for LEP patients was significantly longer when professional interpreters were not used at admission or both admission/discharge.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11606-012-2041-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.Key Words: low English proficient (LEP), interpreters, length of stay (LOS)People living in the United States speak over 300 different languages according to the 2008 US census estimates and over 24 million individuals speak English less than very well, representing 8.6 % of the US population.¹ Low English proficient (LEP) patients seeking medical care often have a difficult time explaining their illness and understanding their doctor’s instructions and treatment plan. Language problems impact multiple aspects of health care including access, patient-physician communication, satisfaction with care and patient safety.² This results in LEP patients being more likely to experience adverse medical events of a serious nature and having difficulty adhering to their treatment plan.³ LEP patients receiving care without qualified interpreters have a poor self-reported understanding of their diagnosis and treatment plan and frequently wish their doctors had explained things better.⁴To avoid these problems, it is imperative that LEP patients be provided with qualified, professional interpreters to help them navigate our health care system. Kaliner et al. described a professional interpreter as one who is paid by a hospital or health system to interpreter.⁵ Training can vary between institutions. Research has shown that the use of untrained, ad hoc interpreters or family members can result in disastrous mistakes. Ad hoc interpreters can misinterpret or omit up to half of physicians’ questions, are more likely to commit errors with clinical significance, have a higher risk of not mentioning medication side effects, and may ignore embarrassing issues (especially when children are used to interpret).^3,6,7From an economical standpoint, it has been found that LEP patients stay in the hospital between 0.7 and 4.3 days longer than English speaking patients with similar conditions.⁸ In addition non-English speaking patient have a higher 30-day readmission rate compared to their English speaking counterparts.⁹ This research did not address the use of professional interpreters though and its effect on LOS or readmission. More recently it’s been shown that providing LEP inpatients with trained medical interpreters throughout their hospital stay can reduce their LOS by almost a day.¹⁰Our objective was to examine hospital length of stay (LOS) and 30-day readmission rates among LEP patients and compare those rates with a patient’s access to professional interpretation. We tried to determine if the timing of interpretation, at admission, discharge or some other time during a patient’s stay was associated was LOS and readmission.     

Hospital readmission after a pancreaticoduodenectomy: an emerging quality metric?

Background

Hospital readmission has attracted attention from policymakers as a measure of quality and a target for cost reduction. The aim of the study was to evaluate the frequency and patterns of rehospitalization after a pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD).

Methods

The records of all patients undergoing a PD at an academic medical centre for malignant or benign diagnoses between January 2006 and September 2011 were retrospectively reviewed. The incidence, aetiology and predictors of subsequent readmission(s) were analysed.

Results

Of 257 consecutive patients who underwent a PD, 50 (19.7%) were readmitted within 30 days from discharge. Both the presence of any post-operative complication (P = 0.049) and discharge to a nursing/rehabilitation facility or to home with health care services (P = 0.018) were associated with readmission. The most common reasons for readmission were diet intolerance (36.0%), pancreatic fistula/abscess (26.0%) and superficial wound infection (8.0%). Nine (18.0%) readmissions had lengths of stay of 2 days or less and in four of those (8.0%) diagnostic evaluation was eventually negative.

Conclusion

Approximately one-fifth of patients require hospital readmission within 30 days of discharge after a PD. A small fraction of these readmissions are short (2 days or less) and may be preventable or manageable in the outpatient setting.     

Measurement of von Willebrand factor as the marker of endothelial dysfunction in vascular diseases

BACKGROUND:

von Willebrand factor is a blood glycoprotein that is required for normal hemostasis. Its level can be increased by endothelial cell damage.

HYPOTHESIS:

von Willebrand factor is a suitable marker of endothelial dysfunction.

METHODS:

von Willebrand factor activity was determined by ELISA in patients with acute coronary syndromes, acute stroke and chronic vascular diseases, and was compared with the values of healthy controls.

RESULTS:

von Willebrand factor activity of patients in each group was significantly higher (P<0.001) than that of the control group. The values of patients with acute coronary syndrome and acute stroke were significantly higher (P<0.05 and P<0.01, respectively) than those of patients with chronic vascular diseases. von Willebrand factor activity was significantly higher in patients with acute coronary syndrome and acute stroke (P<0.05 and P<0.01, respectively) on the sixth day than on admission.

CONCLUSIONS:

By measuring von Willebrand factor activity, a considerable, significant difference could be found between healthy people and chronic and acute vascular patients. The routine measurement of von Willebrand factor activity in vascular patients as an index of endothelial dysfunction may have clinical importance, because detection of this marker can be a noninvasive way of assisting diagnosis and indicating disease progression.     

Variations in the management of acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

BACKGROUND:

Acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality for patients with COPD. AECOPD are the leading cause of hospital admissions in Canada. Although multiple guidelines have been developed for the acute and chronic management of COPD, there are few quality assurance studies investigating adherence to these guidelines.

METHODS:

A retrospective chart review of all patients admitted to a tertiary care hospital in 2009 for an AECOPD was performed. Using a standardized data abstraction tool, adherence to current guidelines across different physician groups and patient outcomes were assessed. Particular focus was centred on differences in management across physician groups.

RESULTS:

Overall, 293 patients were evaluated. Of these, 82.6% were treated with one or more chronic COPD medication(s) in the community, with only 17.7% of patients treated with a long-acting inhaled anticholinergic medication. For treatment of AECOPD, 58% of patients received corticosteroids and 84% received antibiotics. Compared with general medicine and the hospitalist service, the respiratory medicine service demonstrated significantly better adherence with current treatment guidelines; however, even this was less than optimal. In addition, there was poor follow-up of patients cared for outside of the respiratory service.

CONCLUSIONS:

The present study identified significant care gaps in the treatment of patients admitted with AECOPD and on their discharge.     

Improving health care efficiency through the integration of a physician assistant into an infectious diseases consult service at a large urban community hospital

BACKGROUND:

Physician assistants (PAs) have recently been introduced into the Canadian health care system in some provinces; however, there are little data demonstrating their impact.

METHODS:

A retrospective case-control study was conducted between January 2010 and December 2013. Length of stay (LOS) and mortality were examined in the infectious diseases consult service (IDCS) compared with hospital-wide controls. The two-year period before the introduction of the PA to the IDCS of a large urban community hospital in Canada (2010 to 2011) was compared with the two-year period following the introduction of the PA (2012 to 2013).

RESULTS:

Following the introduction of a PA to the IDCS, there was a decrease in time to consultation from 21.4 h to 14.3 h (P<0.0001). LOS was significantly decreased among IDCS patients by 3.6 days more than that seen in matched hospital-wide controls (P=0.0001). Mortality did not significantly change after PA introduction in either cases or controls.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION:

PAs can improve health efficiencies in the Canadian health care setting, leading to reduction in LOS.