Long-Term Treatment Efficacy and Safety of Clevudine Therapy in Na?ve Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B

Background/Aims

Clevudine (CLV) has potent antiviral activity against chronic hepatitis B (CHB) virus infection. The long-term efficacy and safety of CLV therapy in naïve patients with CHB were investigated.

Methods

In this retrospective study, 152 naïve Korean patients with CHB who received 30 mg of CLV once daily for at least 12 months were investigated.

Results

The cumulative rates at months 12, 24, and 36, respectively, were 65.8%, 74.7%, and 74.7% for undetectable serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA (<12 IU/mL); 77.6%, 86.2%, and 86.2% for normalization of serum alanine aminotransferase (<40 IU/L); 17.6%, 23.5%, and 23.5% for hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) loss or seroconversion; and 6.6%, 22.5%, and 30.0% for viral breakthrough. HBeAg positivity (p=0.010), baseline serum HBV DNA level ≥6 log₁₀ IU/mL (p=0.032) and detectable serum HBV DNA (≥12 IU/mL) at week 24 (p=0.023) were independently associated with the development of viral breakthrough. During follow-up, CLV-induced myopathy developed in 5.9% of patients.

Conclusions

The results of long-term CLV therapy for the treatment of naïve patients with CHB showed a high frequency of antiviral resistance and substantial associated myopathy. Therefore, we advise that CLV should not be used as a first-line treatment for naïve patients given the availability of other more potent, safer antiviral agents.     

Tenofovir in the Treatment of Na?ve and Refractory Chronic Hepatitis B: A Single Center Experience in Saudi Arabia

Background/Aims:

Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) is a nucleotide analog used in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) infection. This study evaluated the efficacy of TDF in achieving undetectable HBV DNA after 48 weeks of treatment in a Saudi cohort of CHB patients.

Patients and Methods:

This retrospective study included patients treated at a tertiary care center in Saudi Arabia from January 2009 to December 2012. Of the 68 eligible patients, 51 were treatment naïve and 17 were treatment-refractory. Twenty-three patients tested positive for HBeAg. The remaining 45 patients were HBeAg-negative.

Results:

The mean HBV DNA viral load decreased from 95 million IU/mL at baseline to 263 IU/mL after 48 weeks of treatment (P < 0.001). Overall, 62% of patients achieved a complete virological response (CVR) and 37% a partial virological response (PVR). Respective CVR and PVR rates according to subgroup were: HBeAg-positive (21.7% and 78.3%) and HBeAg-negative (84.4% and 15.6%). At 48 weeks, HBV DNA was undetectable in 66.7% of treatment-naïve and 53% of treatment-refractory patients (P = 0.3). Seroconversion occurred in 13 (57%) of HBeAg-positive patients. Two (3%) of the HBeAg-negative patients lost HBsAg at follow up. Mean alanine aminotransferase decreased significantly from 134 U/L before treatment to 37 U/L at 48 weeks (P < 0.001). Significant adverse events were not encountered during the study period.

Conclusion:

Forty-eight weeks of treatment with TDF reduced HBV DNA to undetectable levels in more than half of our patients regardless of whether they were treatment-naïve or refractory. HBeAg-negative (vs positive) patients experienced a better response rate.     

Continuous Long-Term Entecavir Therapy in Na?ve Chronic Hepatitis B Patients Showing Partial Virologic Response

Background/Aims

We investigated the efficacy of continuous long-term entecavir 0.5 mg treatment in naïve chronic hepatitis B patients showing a partial virologic response (PVR).

Methods

A total of 227 patients were included. PVR was defined as a more than 1 log₁₀ IU/mL decline in detectable serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA by polymerase chain reaction (PCR; ≥20 IU/mL) at week 48. A complete virologic response (CVR) was defined as undetectable serum HBV DNA by PCR (<20 IU/mL) at week 48.

Results

At week 48, the rate of the PVR was 64/227 (28.2%). Among patients with PVR, the cumulative rates of virologic response (serum HBV DNA <20 IU/mL) at weeks 96 and 144 were 45.2% and 73.8%, respectively. The cumulative rates of genotypic resistance were not significantly different between patients with a PVR and patients with a CVR (p=0.057). However, the cumulative rates of virologic breakthrough were higher in patients with PVR than in patients with CVR (4% vs 0% and 11.2% vs 0% at weeks 96 and 144, respectively; p<0.001).

Conclusions

Long-term continuous entecavir 0.5 mg treatment in patients with a PVR resulted in an additional virologic response without a significant increase in genotypic resistance. However, the rate of virologic breakthrough was higher in the partial responders.     

Partial Response to Entecavir and Tenofovir in Na?ve Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B: Clinical Relevance and Management

Entecavir and tenofovir are the currently recommended first line analogues for treatment of na?ve patients with chronic hepatitis B. Despite their overall efficacy and high genetic barrier granting for a low risk of resistance, both regimens will fail to completely suppress HBV DNA at week 48 in 10% of HBeAg-negative and 30% of HBeAg-positive patients. A pre-treatment level >8 log₁₀ IU/mL HBV DNA and poor medication adherence were the most significant predictors of a partial virological response (PVR). While the clinical relevance of PVR is still poorly understood, nucleos(t)ide (NUC)-naive PVR patients who maintained detectable levels of viremia in follow up, were at risk of developing resistance to ETV. Patients with a suboptimal decline of viremia during the first 48?weeks of therapy with ETV and/or a residual viremia >1,000?IU/mL, can be protected by a rescue switch to TDF. Resistance to TDF has not been described so far, yet the long-term risk of PVR in TDF-treated patients remains unclear.     

Virologic Response and Safety of Tenofovir Versus Entecavir in Treatment-Na?ve Chronic Hepatitis B patients

Background/Aims:

This study aimed to evaluate the antiviral response and safety of tenofovir (TDF) versus entecavir (ETV) in treatment-naïve CHB patients.

Patients and Methods:

We performed a retrospective cohort study of treatment-naive CHB patients who were treated with TDF or ETV. We analyzed virologic, biochemical, and serologic responses at 3, 6, and 12 months.

Results:

A total of 107 patients (TDF group = 49, ETV group = 58) were included. Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. The estimated proportion of complete virologic response (CVR) in the TDF or ETV group was 44.9% versus 39.7% at 6 months and 89.6% versus 83.2% at 12 months, respectively (P = 0.991). Viral breakthrough was not observed in both groups. One patient in the TDF group and two patients in the ETV group experienced HBeAg loss, respectively (P = 0.657). High HBV DNA level at baseline was a significant negative predictor of virologic response by Cox regression analysis (P = 0.007). The safety profile was similar between the two groups. There was no case with serious adverse event.

Conclusions:

Both TDF and ETV were effective in achieving CVR and had a favorable safety profile in treatment-naïve CHB patients. High viral load at baseline was a negative predictive factor of CVR.     

Effect and Predictive Elements for 52 Weeks' Telbivudine Treatment on Naïve HBeAg positive Chronic Hepatitis B

Background

Antiviral treatment with nucleoside analogs has been used for chronic hepatitis B (CHB). Each kind of nucleoside analog has its own characteristics and suitability for patients. Telbivudine (LdT, brand name: Sebivo, Beijing Novartis Pharma Ltd) is the newest nucleoside analog, with strong and rapid viral suppression. However, its resistance rate is relatively high during long-term application, due to low genetic barriers to resistance. So, it is necessary to increase the effect and reduce resistance with effective management, according to baseline factors and early on-treatment responses.

Objectives

To reveal possible predictive factors of the effect of telbivudine (LdT) treatment on naïve HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients to optimize treatment.

Patients and Methods

A total 71 naïve chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled. All patients were treated with LdT 600 mg Qd for at least 52 weeks. Multiple logistic regression analyses were done to investigate the predictive values of baseline factors and responses at Week 24.

Results

The reduction in hepatitis virus B (HBV) DNA level was 6.44 ± 2.38 lg copies/mL at Week 52 compared with baseline. The complete virus response (CVR), biochemical response (BR), serological response (SR), and drug resistance (DR) were 61.99%, 77.46%, 35.21%, and 8.45% respectively. By multiple regression analysis, baseline alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels significantly affected CVR (P = 0.024, OR = 1.008), and baseline ALT and baseline HBV DNA levels were independent compact factors of SR (P = 0.012, OR = 1.007; P = 0.001, OR = 0.423). The differences in CVR, SR, and DR in patients with ALT > 120 Iu/mL compared with patients with ALT ≤ 120 Iu/mL were statistically significant. The differences in SR in patients with HBV DNA > 107 copies/mL compared with patients with HBV DNA ≤ 107 copies/mL were statistically significant. Additionally, CVR, BR, and SR were differed significantly between patients with HBV DNA lower than 300 copies/mL at Week 24 and patients with HBV DNA higher than 300 copies/mL (P = 0.000, P = 0.0016, and P = 0.000, respectively).

Conclusions

There were more responders among naïve HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B patients with lower HBV DNA levels (especially lower than 107 copies/mL) and higher ALT values (especially higher than 120 Iu/mL at baseline) to LdT treatment. Adjustments for treatment strategy should be considered if HBV DNA > 300 copies/mL at Week 24 is observed.     

Very Low Viral Load (VLVL) Relapse Following Treatment of Naïve Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C

Background

Sustained virologic response (SVR) to treatment of naïve patients with chronic hepatitis C (HCV) with pegylated interferon and ribavirin is 50–60%. Patients who relapse have a poor response to re-treatment. We report a group of relapse patients with SVR to low-dose re-treatment after 6 months.

Aim

Characterization of HCV relapse patients with very low viral load (VLVL) (HCV RNA <5,000 IU/ml) 6 months after stopping full-dose initial treatment.

Methods

We identified 120 consecutive naïve patients over 4 years treated with pegylated interferon alpha-2a and ribavirin with full-dose therapy for 24 weeks (non-genotype 1) or 48 weeks (genotype 1) with baseline liver biopsy and at least 6 months of follow-up after treatment. HCV RNA by PCR and hepatic blood tests were obtained monthly during treatment and at least 1, 3, and 6 months post treatment.

Results

Of the initially treated patients, 54.2% had SVR, 25% non-response and 20.8% relapsed. Four of 25 who relapsed (16%) and one similar patient referred to our program had HCV RNA <5,000 IU/ml 6 months after stopping treatment (VLVL relapse). Significant differences (P < 0.05) compared with the 21 other relapse patients included all five patients who were genotype 1; 4/5 had cirrhosis, baseline HCV RNA was lower, and all had SVR to less intensive re-treatment for 6 months.

Conclusion

VLVL relapse patients should be sought, because SVR to re-treatment is common despite genotype 1 cirrhosis.

     

Improved Efficacy of a Pegylated Interferon-α-2a Stepwise Optimization Treatment Strategy in the Treatment of Hepatitis B e Antigen-positive Chronic Hepatitis B Patients

Current pegylated interferon-α (PEG-IFN) treatment for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) e-antigen (HBeAg)-positive patients are suboptimal, and effective ways of improving PEG-IFN treatment efficacy are needed.This retrospective cohort study compared the efficacy of a PEG-IFN stepwise optimization treatment (PEG-IFN SOT) strategy with that of a 48-week PEG-IFN standard therapy (PEG-IFN ST) in HBeAg-positive CHB patients.A total of 110 patients were included in our study. Of these, 70 received the PEG-IFN SOT and 40 received the PEG-IFN ST (control group). We based the decision whether to add adefovir and/or extend the PEG-IFN–based treatment to 96 weeks on the patients’ 12-week or 24-week early virological response (12W EVR, at least a 2 log₁₀ reduction in HBV DNA copies/mL at week 12; 24W EVR, at least 1 log₁₀ reduction in HBsAg IU/mL or HBsAg <1500 IU/mL at week 24) and their 48-week partial response (48W PR, 1.0 ≤HBeAg ≤10.0 S/CO or HBeAg >10.0 S/CO but HBsAg <1000 IU/mL).The HBeAg seroconversion rate 24 weeks post-PEG-IFN treatment was significantly higher in the PEG-IFN SOT than the PEG-IFN ST group (50% vs 22.5%, P = 0.005). The HBsAg clearance rates in the PEG-IFN SOT and ST groups were 10% and 0% (P = 0.04), respectively. Receiving PEG-IFN SOT (OR = 0.26, P = 0.01), ALT × ULN at baseline (OR = 0.74, P = 0.003), and achieving 12 and 24W EVR (OR = 0.29, P = 0.03) were independent factors associated with HBeAg seroconversion.PEG-IFN SOT is a promising strategy for achieving high rates of serological response in HBeAg-positive CHB patients.     

HCV Therapy in 2011: Development of New Treatment Paradigms for Na?ve and Non-Responder Patients

The approval of the first direct-acting antiviral (DAA) drugs for treatment of HCV in 2011 has lead to improved sustained viral response (SVR) rates up to 79% in treatment-na?ve or relapse genotype 1 (G1) patients, and up to 59% for non-responder G1 patients. This review discusses the clinical skills required for the use of direct-acting anti-viral drugs (DAA), the use of genetic tests and HCV RNA assays, resistance-associated variants (RAV), treatment of special populations, and future directions. The results of the pivotal phase 3 trials with both telaprevir and boceprevir are summarized, including the efficacy, safety and tolerability, drug-drug interactions and management of the most common side-effects. Treatment strategies implemented in order to minimize the development of resistance with these first-generation protease inhibitors are explored. The use of these drugs ushers in a new era for the treatment of HCV but should be done with both care and caution.     

Effectiveness of Sofosbuvir,Ribavirin and PEG-IFNα-2a in the Treatment of Naïve Egyptian Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 4

Background

Egypt is one of the largest epidemic areas of hepatitis C virus (HCV) in the world. Its prevalent genotype is 4 with a majority of subtype 4a. In 2013, the Food and Drug Administration approved a new direct-acting antiviral drug (sofosbuvir) to treat patients with chronic HCV infection. In Egypt, the patients are already being treated with sofosbuvir in conjunction with ribavirin and pegylated interferon alfa-2a (PEG-IFNα-2a) for 12 weeks since 2015. The present study was planned to explain the efficacy of this treatment regimen against the HCV genotype 4a in Egyptian patients and its pretreatment predictive factors of virological response.

Early Treatment Consideration in Patients with Hepatitis B ‘e’ Antigen-Positive Chronic Infection: Is It Time for a Paradigm Shift?

Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, due to the adverse sequelae of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). To date, antiviral therapy has been reserved for patients with ostensibly active liver disease, fibrosis or cirrhosis, and/or increased risk of HCC. Historically, patients with hepatitis B ‘e’ antigen (HBeAg)-positive chronic infection, were not offered antiviral therapy. Nevertheless, there has been compelling evidence emerging in recent years, demonstrating that this disease phase is in fact not characterized by immunological tolerance. HBV integration into the human genome is a frequent event found in these patients. Additionally, it may well be associated with active inflammation and fibrosis, even in the presence of persistently normal liver enzymes. Likewise, it appears that the mechanisms of hepatocarcinogenesis are already present during this early stage of the disease. This was reflected in the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) guidelines, where treating patients above the age of 30 years with HBeAg-positive chronic infection was proposed. Lowering the treatment threshold to broaden treatment eligibility is likely to slow disease progression and reduce the risk of developing HCC. The current review discusses the reasons to consider early antiviral therapy in HBeAg-positive chronic infection.     

Clinical Analysis of Polyethylene Glycol Interferon-α Treatment in 155 Hepatitis B e Antigen (HBeAg)-Positive Chronic Hepatitis B (CHB) Patients

PurposeThis study aims to investigate the antiviral effect of polyethylene glycol (PEG)-interferon α-2a and PEG-interferon α-2b treatment on hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive chronic hepatitis B (CHB) at the 48th week of treatment and the 24th and 48th week after withdrawal, in order to provide guidance on the antiviral treatment of HBeAg-positive CHB patients.Material and methodsAntiviral treatment was performed on 155 HBeAg-positive CHB patients. Among these patients, 66 patients received PEG-interferon α-2a treatment and 89 patients received PEG-interferon α-2b treatment; and these treatments were administered by subcutaneous injection, once per week, which lasted for 48 weeks. Other antiviral and hepatoprotective drugs were not used during the treatment.ResultsAt the 48th week of treatment, ALT recovery rate, HBsAg seroconversion rate, HBeAg seroconversion rate and HBV DNA titers dropped below 200 IU/mL rate were 69.7%, 6.1%, 27.3% and 50.0%, respectively, in the PEG-interferon α-2a group; and were 70.8%, 6.7%, 33.7% and 62.9%, respectively, in the PEG-interferon α-2b group. At the 24th and 48th week of follow-up after withdrawal, HBsAg seroconversion rate in these two groups did not change; and HBeAg seroconversion rate further increased. Furthermore, HBV DNA revealed a low recurrence rate. The difference between these two groups was not significantly significant.ConclusionsPEG-interferon α-2a and PEG-interferon α-2b are effective antiviral drugs for the treatment of HBeAg-positive CHB, which has a HBsAg seroconversion rate of more than 5%. Furthermore, this sustained response effect was maintained at the 24th and 48th week of follow-up after withdrawal.     

Digital Quantification Is More Precise than Traditional Semiquantitation of Hepatic Steatosis: Correlation with Fibrosis in 220 Treatment-Naïve Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C

Background  

Steatosis, as associated with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), has been considered a risk factor for development of fibrosis.     

Pentraxin-3: A Novel Marker for Indicating Liver Fibrosis in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients?

Background: Pentraxin-3 (PTX-3) is an important marker that plays a role in suppressing inflammation and tissue repair. The aim of this study is to investigate the diagnostic and prognostic characteristics of PTX-3 in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients and the relationship between PTX-3 levels and fibrosis.Methods: A total of 52 CHB patients and 40 healthy subjects were included in the study. All of the CHB patients underwent liver biopsy and were then scored using an Ishak histologic scoring system. Blood samples were collected to evaluate the PTX-3 levels.Results: Of the subjects who participated in the study, 53% were female. The PTX-3 levels were determined as 5.63 ng/mL in the control group, and as 0.88 ng/mL in the CHB patient group. PTX-3 levels were found to be 1.19 ng/mL in stage 1, 0.89 ng/mL in stage 2, 0.68 ng/mL in stage 3, and 0.55 ng/mL in stage 4. Of the CHB patients, 44.2% had significant fibrosis, while 55.7% were identified as not having significant fibrosis. The PTX-3 values were 0.64 and 1.0 ng/mL in patients with and without significant fibrosis, respectively. The cut-off value for PTX-3 in predicting the absence of significant fibrosis was estimated as 0.9 ng/mL.Conclusion: The CHB patients were found to have lower serum PTX-3 levels compared to the control group, and these levels decreased even further as the stage of fibrosis progressed. In addition, the significant decrease in PTX-3 levels in patients with stage 1 fibrosis compared to the control group shows that PTX-3 can be used as a non-invasive marker for the early detection of fibrosis (P < .001).