Clinical activity of a new regimen combining gemcitabine and alemtuzumab in high‐risk relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients

Optimal treatment strategies are lacking in relapsed/refractory (R/R) chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Gemcitabine has shown activity and acceptable safety profile in B‐cell lymphomas. We present a retrospective case review of gemcitabine and alemtuzumab, every 21 d (for up to six courses) in 27 community‐based patients with high‐risk R/R CLL. Median age was 70 yr (44–83 yr), 55% patients had Binet stage C, deletion 17p (del(17p)) and/or deletion 11q (del(11q)) were found in 65% and 27%, bulky disease in 55.5%, and fludarabine‐refractoriness in 48% of cases, respectively. Overall response rate was 63% (29.6% clinical CR and 33.4% PR). At a median follow‐up of 31 months, median PFS and OS were 15.4 and 24 months. In multivariate analysis, median OS is influenced by prior lines of treatment = 3 and bulky disease. Combination of alemtuzumab and gemcitabine appears to be an active, easy to administrate treatment in routine practice, high‐risk R/R CLL patients.     

Platinum and high‐dose cytarabine‐based regimens are efficient in ultra high/high‐risk chronic lymphocytic leukemia and Richter's syndrome: results of a French retrospective multicenter study

Ultra high‐risk chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and Richter's syndrome (RS) usually display a poor prognosis. Platinum and cytarabine‐based regimens have not been evaluated in large cohorts of patients with CLL or RS. This retrospective study was aimed to assess the efficacy of these regimens in 75 patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) CLL or RS. Forty‐seven patients had R/R CLL (including 36 ultra high‐risk CLL) and 28 had RS. Median age was 62 years (range, 18–79 years). Median number of previous therapies was 3 (range, 1–7), including fludarabine‐based regimens (75%) and alemtuzumab (32%), and 61% of patients were refractory to their last treatment. Deletions of chromosomes 17p and 11q were found in 40% and 39% of cases, respectively. The overall response rates were 60% with 24% complete response (CR) in CLL, and 43% with 25% CR in RS. The median progression‐free survival and overall survival were 11 and 14.6 months, respectively. Fludarabine refractoriness and 17p deletion were not associated with a poorer outcome. The only factors predicting shorter survival were performance status ≥2 (P = 0.04) and albumin level <3.5 g/dL (P = 0.0004). Toxicities were mainly myelosuppression and infectious complications. Platinum and high‐dose cytarabine‐based regimens provide high response rates in high‐risk CLL and in RS. However, these results will be challenged by the new arriving agents at least in non‐transformed CLL.     

Fludarabine,cytarabine, and attenuated‐dose idarubicin (m‐FLAI) combination therapy for elderly acute myeloid leukemia patients

We performed a phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the modified fludarabine, cytarabine, and attenuated‐dose idarubicin (m‐FLAI) regimen in elderly acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. Elderly (≥60 years) AML patients who had not previously received chemotherapy were enrolled in the study. Patients received two consecutive cycles of m‐FLAI chemotherapy as an induction. The m‐FLAI regimen comprised fludarabine (25 mg/m², days 1–4), cytarabine (1,000 mg/m², days 1–4), and attenuated‐dose idarubicin (5 mg/m², days 1–3). The primary end point was complete remission (CR) rate. Secondary end points were overall survival (OS), event‐free survival (EFS), and treatment‐related mortality (TRM). There were 108 patients (median age 68.4 years, M:F = 64:44) enrolled in the study. CR was achieved in 56.5% of patients, and the TRM rate was 21.3%. Median OS and median EFS were 10.2 and 6.6 months, respectively. The mortality at 30 and 60 days was 15 and 21%, respectively. Performance status and comorbidity did not have prognostic value in this patient cohort. Bone marrow expression of CD117 was associated with increased EFS and OS. m‐FLAI is an effective induction regimen for previously untreated AML in elderly patients. In addition, bone‐marrow CD117 expression is an independent favorable prognostic factor in elderly AML patients. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01247493). Am. J. Hematol. 2013. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Bendamustine in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: Outcome according to different clinical and biological prognostic factors in the everyday clinical practice

Bendamustine proved to be effective for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). However, the relationship between its activity with clinico‐biological prognosticators has been addressed only in few studies. We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy of bendamustine, in a real‐life contest, on 142 patients, median age 70 years, median number of previous regimens 2 (0–8, 13% previously untreated). Bendamustine was administered for a median number of 4 cycles, in 84% of cases with rituximab. Overall (ORR) and complete response (CRR) rates were 68 and 16.5%, respectively. Multivariate analysis demonstrated a relationship between ORR and number of prior treatments (OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.08–0.71; P = 0.009), del(17p) (OR 0.10, 95% CI 0.03–0.32; P < 0.001) and concomitant rituximab (OR 4.37, 95% CI 1.12–17.04; P = 0.033). The estimated 1‐ and 2‐years overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) rates were 76, 61, 51, and 26%, respectively. Previous sensitivity to fludarabine (HR 0.36, 95% CI 0.16–0.82), response to bendamustine (HR 0.21, 95% CI 0.10–0.45), and del(17p) (HR 2.18, 95% CI 1.002–4.74) had a prognostic significance in multivariate analysis for PFS, while the number of previous therapies (HR 3.48, 95% CI 1.29–9.38; P = 0.014), concomitant use of rituximab (HR 0.32, 95% CI 0.11–0.93) and response to bendamustine (HR 0.22, 95% CI 0.07–0.66) were significant for OS. Side effects included grade 3–4 neutropenia, infections, thrombocytopenia and anemia which occurred in 40, 14, 14, and 10% of patients, respectively. These results confirm the activity and safety of bendamustine and rituximab combination even in patients with unfavorable clinical and biological features excluding del(17p). Am. J. Heamtol. 88:955–960, 2013. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Bendamustine compared with chlorambucil in previously untreated patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: updated results of a randomized phase III trial

The efficacy of bendamustine versus chlorambucil in a phase III trial of previously untreated patients with Binet stage B/C chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) was re‐evaluated after a median observation time of 54 months in May 2010. Overall survival (OS) was analysed for the first time. At follow‐up, investigator‐assessed complete response (CR) rate (21·0% vs 10·8%), median progression‐free survival (21·2 vs 8·8 months; P < 0·0001; hazard ratio 2·83) and time to next treatment (31·7 vs 10·1 months; P < 0·0001) were improved for bendamustine over chlorambucil. OS was not different between groups for all patients or those ≤65 years, >65 years, responders and non‐responders. However, patients with objective response or a CR experienced a significantly longer OS than non‐responders or those without a CR. Significantly more patients on chlorambucil progressed to second/further lines of treatment compared with those on bendamustine (78·3% vs 63·6%; P = 0·004). The benefits of bendamustine over chlorambucil were achieved without reducing quality of life. In conclusion, bendamustine is significantly more effective than chlorambucil in previously untreated CLL patients, with the achievement of a CR or objective response appearing to prolong OS. Bendamustine should be considered as a preferred first‐line option over chlorambucil for CLL patients ineligible for fludarabine, cyclophosphamide and rituximab.     

Clofarabine,idarubicin, and cytarabine (CIA) as frontline therapy for patients ≤60 years with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia

Clofarabine is a second generation nucleoside analogue with activity in adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). A phase I trial of clofarabine, idarubicin, and cytarabine (CIA) in relapsed and refractory AML had shown an overall response rate (ORR) of 48%. To explore this combination further, we conducted a phase II study of (CIA) in patients with newly diagnosed AML ≤60 years. Patients ≥18–60 years with AML and adequate organ function were enrolled. Induction therapy consisted of clofarabine (C) 20 mg m^?2 IV daily (days 1–5), idarubicin (I) 10 mg m^?2 IV daily (days 1–3), and cytarabine (A) 1 g m^?2 IV daily (days 1–5). Patients in remission received up to six consolidation cycles (C 15 mg m^?2 × 3, I 8 mg m^?2 × 2, and A 0.75 g m^?2 × 3). Fifty‐seven patients were evaluable. ORR was 79%. With a median follow up of 10.9 months, the median overall survival (OS) was not reached, the median event‐free survival (EFS) was 13.5 months. Most toxicities were ≤grade 2. Four week mortality was 2%. In subgroup analysis, patients ≤40 years had better OS (P = 0.04) and EFS (P = 0.04) compared to patients >40 years. Compared to historical patients treated with idarubicin and cyarabine (IA), the OS and EFS were significantly longer for CIA treated patients. In multivariate analysis, CIA retained its favorable impact on OS compared to IA. Thus, CIA is an effective and safe therapy for patients ≤60 years with newly diagnosed AML. Am. J. Heamtol. 88:961–966, 2013. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Bendamustine,bortezomib and rituximab produces durable complete remissions in patients with previously untreated,low grade lymphoma

This Phase II trial evaluated the efficacy of bendamustine, bortezomib and rituximab in patients with previously untreated low‐grade lymphoma. Eligible patients had low grade lymphoma with no previous systemic disease treatment. Treatment for all patients was given in 28‐day cycles for a maximum of 6 cycles. Patients received rituximab 375 mg/m² intravenously (IV) on days 1, 8 and 15 of cycle 1 and day 1 of cycles 2–6; bendamustine 90 mg/m² IV on days 1 and 2; and bortezomib 1·6 mg/m² IV on days 1, 8 and 15. Patients were permitted to begin maintenance treatment with rituximab 6 months after completion of study treatment and after 6‐month follow‐up assessments had been conducted. Fifty‐four eligible patients were enrolled. The most common grade 3/4 toxicities were leucopenia (28%), neutropenia (30%) and lymphopenia (17%). There were no treatment‐related deaths and 1 unrelated death on study (embolic stroke). The overall response rate was 94% for all patients. The median follow‐up was 54 months. Kaplan–Meier estimates of progression‐free survival and overall survival at 36 months were 75% and 88%, respectively. The treatment regimen was well tolerated and produced high response rates. Further study of this regimen in patients with previously untreated lymphoma is warranted.     

Lenalidomide,bendamustine and prednisolone exhibits a favourable safety and efficacy profile in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: final results of a phase 1 clinical trial OSHO – #077

This phase 1 dose finding study tested a combination of lenalidomide, bendamustine and prednisolone (RBP) in 21 patients in five cohorts with advanced multiple relasped/refractory myeloma (MM) to determine the maximum tolerable dose (MTD) of the combination. The first cohort received a starting dose of lenalidomide 10 mg/d, days 1–21, bendamustine 60 mg/m²/d, days 1–2, and prednisolone 100 mg/d, days 1–4. Dose escalation was done in cohorts of three to six patients with lenalidomide dose increasing to 15, 20 and 25 mg, and after reaching 25 mg/d, bendamustine was increased to 75 mg/m². A total of 21 patients were enrolled and all completed at least two cycles. Two patients developed dose‐limiting haemotoxicity: one patient on lenalidomide 25 mg/d and bendamustine 60 mg/m² and another patient at the highest dose level (lenalidomide 25 mg/d and bendamustine 75 mg/m²). The MTD was not reached. Sixteen patients (76%) responded after at least two cycles of RBP with one stringent complete response (CR), one near CR, five very good partial response and nine partial response. After a median observation time of 16 months, progression‐free survival at 18 months was 48% and overall survival was 64%. In conclusion, RBP with lenalidomide 25 mg/d, days 1–21 and bendamustine 75 mg/m² days 1–2 is well tolerated in patients with relapsed/refractory MM.     

Combination trial of duvelisib (IPI-145) with rituximab or bendamustine/rituximab in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma or chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Duvelisib, a potent δ- and γ-PI3K inhibitor, is a potential therapeutic for hematologic malignancies. Rituximab and bendamustine have demonstrated activity in non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Combining duvelisib with either rituximab alone or rituximab and bendamustine may improve response rates and remission durability. We conducted this Phase one study in relapsed/refractory NHL and CLL patients. During expansion, each arm enrolled to disease-specific cohorts to assess efficacy. Arm one received rituximab 375 mg/m² IV weekly for two 4-week cycles plus duvelisib until progression/intolerance. Arm two received rituximab 375 mg/m² IV Day one, bendamustine 90 mg/m² IV (NHL patients) or 70 mg/m² IV (CLL patients) Days one-two for six cycles, plus duvelisib until progression/intolerance. Duvelisib doses of 50 mg and 75 mg BID were tested during dose escalation. Forty-six patients (27 NHL, 19 CLL) were treated. The adverse events of the drug combinations were consistent with single agent toxicities. The most common AEs were neutropenia (47.7%), fatigue (41.3%), and rash (41.3%). A duvelisib expansion dose of 25 mg BID was chosen based on the monotherapy phase one study, IPI-145-02, which confirmed that dose for further clinical development. Overall response rate was 71.8%. Median progression-free survival was 13.7 months. Median overall survival has not been reached, but 30-month overall survival probability was 62%. Duvelisib combined with rituximab, or bendamustine and rituximab did not appear to increase toxicities beyond the known safety profile of the individual agents. Further study is needed to determine if these combinations improve efficacy.     

Bendamustine,thalidomide and dexamethasone combination therapy for relapsed/refractory myeloma patients: results of the MUKone randomized dose selection trial

There is a significant unmet need in effective therapy for relapsed myeloma patients once they become refractory to bortezomib and lenalidomide. While data from the front line setting suggest bendamustine is superior to melphalan, there is no information defining optimal bendamustine dose in multiply‐treated patients. We report a multi‐centre randomized two‐stage phase 2 trial simultaneously assessing deliverability and activity of two doses of bendamustine (60 mg/m² vs. 100 mg/m²) days 1 and 8, thalidomide (100 mg) days 1–21 and low dose dexamethasone (20 mg) days 1, 8, 15 and 22 of a 28‐d cycle. Ninety‐four relapsing patients were treated on trial, with a median three prior treatment lines. A pre‐planned interim deliverability and activity assessment led to closure of the 100 mg/m² arm due to excess cytopenias, and led to amendment of entry criteria for cytopenias. Non‐haematological toxicities including thromboembolism and neurotoxicity were infrequent. In the 60 mg/m² arm, treatment was deliverable in 61·1% subjects and the partial response rate was 46·3% in the study eligible population, with 7·5 months progression‐free survival. This study demonstrates bendamustine at 60 mg/m² twice per month with thalidomide and dexamethasone is deliverable for repeated cycles in heavily pre‐treated myeloma patients and has substantial clinical activity.     

A phase 2, multicenter study investigating ofatumumab and bendamustine combination in patients with untreated or relapsed CLL

The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of the combination of ofatumumab and bendamustine in patients with previously untreated or relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Patients received IV ofatumumab (cycle 1: 300 mg day 1 and 1,000 mg day 8; cycles 2–6: 1,000 mg on day 1 every 28 days) and IV bendamustine 90 mg m^?2 (previously untreated) or 70 mg m^?2 (relapsed) on days 1 and 2 of each 28‐day cycle, for up to 6 cycles. Forty‐four previously untreated and 53 relapsed patients were enrolled. Median age was 62.5 years (previously untreated) and 68 years (relapsed); relapsed patients had received a median of 1 (range 1–11) prior therapy. The investigator‐assessed overall response rate was 95% (43% complete response [CR]) for the previously untreated, and 74% (11% CR) for the relapsed patients. The regimen was well tolerated with 89% (previously untreated) and 85% (relapsed patients) receiving all 6 cycles. No unexpected toxicities were reported. Grade 3/4 events occurred in 57% of previously untreated, and 72% of relapsed patients. At ～29 months’ follow‐up, the median progression‐free survival (PFS) was not reached for the previously untreated population, and the 28‐month PFS estimate was 72.3%. The median PFS for the relapsed population was 22.5 months (95% CI: 14.0–27.3 months). The combination of ofatumumab and bendamustine was well tolerated and effective in these previously untreated or relapsed populations. Am. J. Hematol. 91:900–906, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Bendamustine compared to fludarabine as second-line treatment in chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Bendamustine demonstrated clinical activity in pre-treated hematological malignancies due to its unique mechanism of action distinct from standard alkylating agents. This study assessed its efficacy in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia pre-treated with an alkylator, in comparison to fludarabine. Patients with relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia requiring treatment after one previous systemic regimen (usually chlorambucil-based) were randomized to either receive bendamustine 100 mg/m² on days 1 and 2 of a 4-week cycle or standard fludarabine treatment consisting of 25 mg/m² on days 1 to 5 every 4 weeks. The primary objective was to achieve non-inferior progression-free survival (PFS) with bendamustine. Out of a total of 96 patients randomized, 92 were eligible, 49 allocated to bendamustine and 43 to fludarabine. About half of the patients received six or more cycles. Overall response rates were 76 % on bendamustine and 62 % on fludarabine, with clinical complete response rates of 27 and 9 %, respectively. Median PFS was 20.1 and 14.8 months (hazard ratio, 0.87; 90 % confidence interval, 0.60–1.27), median overall survival 43.8 and 41.0 months (hazard ratio, 0.82). Thrombocytopenia and gastrointestinal toxicities were marginally more frequent on bendamustine, albeit CTC grade 3/4 event incidence was similar. These data suggest at least comparable efficacy of bendamustine vs. fludarabine, pointing to an alternative treatment option in relapsing CLL patients after chlorambucil containing initial chemotherapy.     

Randomized phase 2 study of otlertuzumab and bendamustine versus bendamustine in patients with relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukaemia

Otlertuzumab (TRU ‐016) is a humanized anti‐CD 37 protein therapeutic that triggers direct caspase‐independent apoptosis of malignant B cells and induces antibody‐dependent cell‐mediated cytotoxicity. Patients with relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL ) received either otlertuzumab (20 mg/kg) weekly by IV infusion for two 28‐day cycles then every 14 days for four 28‐day cycles and IV bendamustine (70 mg/m²) on Days 1 and 2 of each cycle for up to six 28‐day cycles or bendamustine alone. Thirty‐two patients were treated with otlertuzumab and bendamustine and 33 with bendamustine alone. Overall response rate according to the International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia criteria was 69% in the otlertuzumab and bendamustine arm and 39% in the bendamustine alone arm (P  = 0·025). Median progression‐free survival (PFS ) was 15·9 months in the otlertuzumab and bendamustine arm and 10·2 months in the bendamustine alone arm (P  = 0·0192). There was a higher incidence of pyrexia (34% vs. 12%) and neutropenia (59% vs. 39%) with the combination but this did not result in a higher incidence of severe (grade 3/4) infections (13% vs. 27%). This combination significantly increased the response rate and prolonged the PFS over single agent bendamustine in patients with relapsed or refractory CLL .     

Salvage therapy for acute myeloid leukemia with fludarabine,cytarabine, and idarubicin with or without gemtuzumab ozogamicin and with concurrent or sequential G‐CSF

The current salvage therapies for relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are unsatisfactory. Over the past 7 years, we have used two salvage regimens: fludarabine, cytarabine, and idarubicin with (FLAG‐IM) or without gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) (9 mg/m² on Day 8) (FLAG‐I) in relapsed/refractory AML. Three‐quarters of patients also received concurrent G‐CSF. Seventy‐one patients were treated, 23 with FLAG‐I and 48 with FLAG‐IM. The median duration of follow‐up was 30.6 months. The treatment groups were well balanced with median ages of 48 years (range 18–70) and 47 years (range 20–68), unfavorable cytogenetics in 57% and 35%, prior allogeneic stem cell transplant in 43% and 42%, and CR1 duration <1 year in 60% and 67%, respectively, for FLAG‐I and FLAG‐IM. The complete remission (CR) rate in the FLAG‐I group was 39% with an additional 13% achieving a CRp [overall response rate (ORR) 52%]; the CR rate in the FLAG‐IM group was 29% with an additional 27% achieving a CRp (ORR 56%). The median duration of response (DOR; 16.8 vs. 8.3 months), event‐free survival (EFS; 7.4 vs. 4.1 months), and overall survival (OS; 8.8 vs. 5.0 months) trended to favor FLAG‐I over FLAG‐IM. The patients who received G‐CSF concurrent with chemotherapy had superior overall response rate (ORR; 62% vs. 29%, P = 0.026), median EFS (6.2 vs. 3.4 months, P = 0.010), and OS (8.8 vs. 3.9 months, P = 0.004) when compared with those who sequentially received G‐CSF and chemotherapy, regardless of chemotherapy regimen. The addition of GO, at this dose and schedule, to FLAG‐I failed to improve the outcomes in patients with relapsed/refractory AML. The patients who received G‐CSF concurrently with chemotherapy had improved outcomes. Am. J. Hematol., 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Bendamustine with or without rituximab in the treatment of relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: an Italian retrospective study

To retrospectively assess the efficacy of bendamustine alone and with rituximab (R-B), 109 patients with relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) were enrolled in 24 Italian centres. The median age was 66 years (range 39-85). Forty-three percent of patients had relapsed and 57% were resistant (median previous therapies = 3; range 1-8). Twenty-two patients received bendamustine alone and 87 patients received R-B (median B dosage: 100 mg/m(2) per day, range 90-130 mg/m(2) per day). The overall response rate was 69·6% (complete response 28·6%; partial response 41%), and was significantly higher in patients treated with R-B (P = 0·014) and in those responsive to the previous treatment (P=0·04). After a median follow-up of 7·9 months (range 1-148), the median progression-free survival was 16 months and the median duration of response was 13 months. Median overall survival (OS) was 16·8 months for the whole cohort; patients not responding to the treatment had a significantly worse outcome than those who attained a response (P = 0·0001). In multivariate analysis, only resistant disease status at start of bendamustine treatment (HR 3·2, 95% CI 1·4-7·3, P = 0·006) had an independent prognostic value for OS. Toxicity was manageable and mostly haematological. In conclusion, in our experience R-B was an effective and well-tolerated treatment for relapsed/refractory CLL patients, producing a remarkable high CR rate and mild toxicity.     

Long term follow‐up of allogeneic stem cell transplantation in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes using busulfan,cytosine arabinoside,and cyclophosphamide

We report here the 10‐year follow‐up of 86 patients who underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). All patients received the busulfan, cytosine arabinoside, and cyclophosphamide (BAC) preparative regimen which consisted of busulfan 16 mg/kg, cytosine arabinoside 8 g/m² IV, and cyclophosphamide 120 mg/kg IV. Fifty‐nine patients (69%) had de novo MDS; 26 (30%) had secondary MDS (treatment related), and one had a preceding aplastic anemia which progressed to MDS before transplant. Cytogenetics (80 patients) was classified as good (34%), intermediate (17%), or poor (42%). With a median follow‐up for survivors of 124 months, the 10‐year Kaplan‐Meier estimates for overall survival (OS) was 43% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 31–53%). Cumulative nonrelapse mortality (NRM) and relapse was 43% (95% CI: 32–54%) and 19% (95% CI: 11–27%), respectively. No patient relapsed after 2 years. In patients with RAEB‐T/AML, 10‐year relapse‐free survival (RFS), relapse, and NRM was 36%, 36%, and 27%, respectively. Younger age (P = 0.05), human leukocyte antigen (HLA) match (P = 0.002), good risk cytogenetics (P = 0.008), and having a related donor (P = 0.03) significantly improved overall and RFS in the multivariable analysis. The long‐term follow‐up of patients receiving the BAC regimen with ASCT in this study indicated durable relapse‐free and OS with acceptable toxicity in this group of patients with high‐risk features. Am. J. Hematol., 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Phase II study of bendamustine,bortezomib and dexamethasone (BBD) in the first‐line treatment of patients with multiple myeloma who are not candidates for high dose chemotherapy

The combination of bendamustine, bortezomib and dexamethasone (BBD ) was evaluated as a first‐line therapy for multiple myeloma. The original treatment regimen of bendamustine 80 mg/m², days 1, 4; bortezomib 1·3 mg/m², days 1, 4, 8, 11; dexamethasone 40 mg, days 1, 2, 3, 4 on a 28‐day cycle (up to 8 cycles) was efficacious but determined relatively toxic in an interim analysis. The regimen was amended to bendamustine 80 mg/m², days 1, 2; bortezomib 1·3 mg/m², days 1, 8, 15; dexamethasone 20 mg, days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16 every 28 days (up to 8 cycles), then maintenance 1·3 mg/m² IV bortezomib every 2 weeks. Fifty‐nine patients were enrolled. Primary endpoint was complete response (CR) rate. The original schema was given for a median of 7 cycles (range 1–8); modified schema was given for a median of 8 cycles (range 1‐8) plus maintenance. Overall response was 91%, CR was 9%. Median follow‐up was 19·1 months; median progression‐free survival was 11·1 months and 18·9 months on the original and modified regimens, respectively. The most common Grade 3/4 adverse events were fatigue and neuropathy. The combination of BBD is tolerable and efficacious in this patient population. Modifications to decrease intensity but increase duration translated to better outcomes.     

Evaluation of 230 patients with relapsed/refractory deletion 17p chronic lymphocytic leukaemia treated with ibrutinib from 3 clinical trials

Patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) with deletion 17p [del(17p)] have poor outcomes with chemoimmunotherapy. Ibrutinib is indicated for the treatment of CLL/SLL, including del(17p) CLL/SLL, and allows for treatment without chemotherapy. This integrated analysis was performed to evaluate outcomes in 230 patients with relapsed/refractory del(17p) CLL/SLL from three ibrutinib studies. With a median of 2 prior therapies (range, 1–12), 18% and 79% of evaluable patients had del(11q) or unmutated IGHV, respectively. With a median follow‐up of 28 months, overall response rate was 85% and estimated 30‐month progression‐free and overall survival rates were 57% [95% confidence interval (CI) 50–64] and 69% (95% CI 61–75), respectively. Patients with normal lactate dehydrogenase or no bulky disease had the most favourable survival outcomes. Sustained haematological improvements in haemoglobin, platelet count and absolute neutrophil count occurred in 61%, 67% and 70% of patients with baseline cytopenias, respectively. New onset severe cytopenias and infections decreased in frequency over time. Progression‐free and overall survival with ibrutinib surpass those of other therapies for patients with del(17p) CLL/SLL. These results provide further evidence of the robust clinical activity of ibrutinib in difficult‐to‐treat CLL/SLL populations.     

Rituximab with high‐dose methotrexate in primary central nervous system lymphoma

The addition of rituximab (R) to chemotherapy improves outcomes in patients with systemic B‐cell non‐Hodgkin lymphomas, but the impact in patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) receiving high‐dose methotrexate (HDMTX) is unknown. Patients diagnosed with PCNSL at the British Columbia Cancer Agency (BCCA) between 2000 and 2013 were treated with ≥1 cycle of HDMTX 8 g/m² every 2 weeks, to best response or 10 cycles. After 2006, rituximab 375 mg/m² was given every 2 weeks with HDMTX for a total of 4 doses. 49 (66%) patients received HDMTX alone and 25 (34%) HDMTX+R, with a median of 5 (range 1–10) HDMTX cycles, and no difference between groups. The median follow‐up was 5 years: 8.8 years (range 3.15–13.5 years) HDMTX and 1.9 years (range 0.5–7 years) HDMTX+R. The 5‐year PFS was 17%, with no difference between groups (HR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.41–1.35; P = 0.33). The 5‐year OS was 38%, with no difference between the groups OS (HR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.35–1.52; P = 0.39). In this retrospective study comparing two subgroups of patients treated in different eras, the addition of R to HDMTX did not appear to improve outcomes in PCNSL, possibly consistent with its known poor CNS penetration. It is possible that with a larger sample size, longer follow‐up, or different rituximab dosing/schedule, the addition of rituximab may lead to a statistically significant improvement in outcomes. Prospective randomized trials currently in progress will more definitively estimate the impact of the addition of rituximab to HDMTX‐based chemotherapy for PCNSL. Am. J. Hematol. 90:1149–1154, 2015. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Fractionated gemtuzumab ozogamicin and standard dose cytarabine produced prolonged second remissions in patients over the age of 55 years with acute myeloid leukemia in late first relapse

Gemtuzumab ozogamicin (fGO), a humanized anti‐CD33 monoclonal antibody linked to calicheamicin in combination with intensive chemotherapy gives high response rates in adult acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients in relapse. However, reduced intensity chemotherapy in combination with fractionated GO has not been tested in aged relapsing patients. Patients from our institution with CD33+ AML aged 55 years or more in first late relapse (≥6 months) were proposed participation in a GO compassionate use program. Induction therapy consisted in fractionated GO (fGO; 3 mg/m², days 1, 4, 7) with standard‐dose cytarabine (200 mg/m²/day, 7 days). Patients were consolidated with two courses of GO and intermediate dose cytarabine. Twenty‐four patients (median age 68 years) received fGO with cytarabine. Median follow‐up was 42 months. The response rate was 75%, including complete remission (CR) in 16 patients and CR with incomplete platelet recovery (CRp) in two patients. Two‐year overall survival (OS) was 51% (95% CI: 28–69) and 2 years relapse‐free survival (RFS) was 51% (95%CI: 25–72). Duration of second CR (CR2) was longer than first CR (CR1) in 9 out of 18 patients. Minimal residual disease (MRD) was negative in evaluable patients in CR2, particularly in NPM1 mutated cases. Toxicity was in line with that of the same fractionated single agent GO schedule. Fractionated GO with low intensity chemotherapy produced high response rates and prolonged CR2 in aged AML patients in first late relapse. Am. J. Hematol. 89:399–403, 2014. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.