8p23.1 duplication detected by array‐CGH with complete atrioventricular septal defect and unilateral hand preaxial hexadactyly

8p23.1 duplication syndrome is a genomic condition with variable phenotype. Isolated 8p23.1 duplication is rare. Here, we report on additional isolated 8p23.1 duplication in a fetus with complete atrioventricular septal defect and right hand preaxial hexadactyly diagnosed by array comparative genomic hybridization (array‐CGH). Array‐CGH indicated an ～1.43 Mb duplication between 8p23.1 olfactory receptor/defensin repeats (ORDRs) in this case, which contains 27 genes of which 21 are known and 6 are novel, including GATA4 and SOX7 and one micro‐RNA gene. In order to better understanding the genotype–phenotype association of 8p23.1 duplications, we summarized the present case and 10 previously reported patients with isolated 8p23.1 duplications between ORDRs and found that minor anomalies (6/11), congenital heart defect (6/11), developmental delay (5/11), and neurodevelopmental problems (5/11) are recurrent manifestations in 8p23.1 duplication patients. Thus, we suggest that 8p23.1 duplications between ORDRs generally result in clinical phenotypes and the phenotypes vary between patients. Because true duplications and euchromatic variants (EVs) of 8p23.1 are cytogenetically indistinguishable and usually lead to different clinical results, it is necessary to differentiate 8p23.1 duplications from EVs using molecular cytogenetic techniques. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Transmitted duplication of 8p23.1-8p23.2 associated with speech delay, autism and learning difficulties

Duplications of distal 8p with and without significant clinical phenotypes have been reported and are often associated with an unusual degree of structural complexity. Here, we present a duplication of 8p23.1-8p23.2 ascertained in a child with speech delay and a diagnosis of ICD-10 autism. The same duplication was found in his mother who had epilepsy and learning problems. A combination of cytogenetic, FISH, microsatellite, MLPA and oaCGH analysis was used to show that the duplication extended over a minimum of 6.8 Mb between 3 539 893 and 10 323 426 bp. This interval contains 32 novel and 41 known genes, of which only microcephalin (MCPH1) is a plausible candidate gene for autism at present. The distal breakpoint of the duplicated region interrupts the CSMD1 gene in 8p23.2 and the medial breakpoint lies between the MSRA and RP1L1 genes in 8p23.1.An interchromosomal insertion between a normal and polymorphically inverted chromosome 8 is proposed to explain the origin of this duplication. Further mapped imbalances of distal 8p are needed to determine whether the autistic component of the phenotype in this family results from the cumulative imbalance of many genes or dosage imbalance of an individual susceptibility gene.     

Direct duplication of 8p21.3→p23.1: A cytogenetic anomaly associated with developmental delay without consistent clinical features

We report six cases in two families and a sporadic case with a direct duplication of region 8p21.3→23.1. In one family, the duplication started in the mother and was transmitted to one son and one daughter. In the second family, the father was mosaic for the anomaly that was transmitted to his two daughters. The cytogenetic anomaly was initially described as an 8p+ with banding analysis and then delineated with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) using whole‐chromosome 8 painting, 8p specific painting, and 8p or 8p/8q subtelomeric probes. Deletion was not detected in the subtelomeric region of the abnormal chromosome 8 examined in one family and in the sporadic case. The phenotypic picture varies from normal to moderate mental retardation in the affected individuals. No consistent minor anomalies or congenital defects were observed among these cases. After comparing the chromosome region involved in our cases with those in others having direct or inverted duplications of 8p, it is thought that the segment 8p21.1→21.3 might be the critical region for an 8p duplication syndrome. The parental origin of the duplication does not seem to impact its clinical significance. © 2001 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Unmasking Kabuki syndrome: chromosome 8p22-8p23.1 duplication revealed by comparative genomic hybridization and BAC-FISH

Kabuki syndrome (KS) is a multiple congenital anomalies/mental retardation syndrome that heretofore has had an unknown etiology. Although several cases with KS features have been reported with different chromosome anomalies, none have had an autosomal cytogenetic aberration in common. We found an 8p22-8p23.1 duplication, using comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) in six unrelated patients diagnosed with KS. This observation was confirmed using BAC-FISH in all cases that delimited the duplicated region to approximately 3.5 Mb. No duplication of this region was found in two parents or 20 controls by either CGH or BAC-FISH. Two out of two mothers of KS patients and one out of 20 controls were found to have a heterozygous submicroscopic inversion at 8p23.1. As the six patients with KS represent different races, this duplication may represent a common etiologic basis for this disorder.     

一例8P倒位重复伴末端缺失综合征的细胞和分子遗传学研究

目的 明确1例智力低下患儿8号染色体短臂异常的片段来源和位置,探讨该异常核型的发生机制、临床表型特征和家庭再发风险.方法 高分辨显带分析患者及其父母外周血染色体核型,比较基因组杂交芯片(array comparative genomic hybridization,array CGH)精细定位拷贝数异常改变的染色体片段区域,荧光定量PCR验证芯片分析结果.结果 患儿异常染色体为8p11.2-p23.1倒位重复和8p23.2-pter缺失;在重复和缺失之间间隔有1个长为5.70 Mb的拷贝数正常片段,嗅觉受体(olfactory receptor,OR)基因簇位于该片段的两端.结论 这是1例典型的inv dup del(8p)综合征,临床上以重度智力低下、大脑发育不良和特殊面容为主要特征,由8p23.1上OR基因簇的重复序列发生非等位同源重组所致.再生育时,不仅要预防inv dup del(8p)的再发风险,还要注意由同一重组机制造成的另外3种不良结局的妊娠风险.就目前所知,这是国内第1例明确诊断的inv dup del(8p)综合征.     

Transmitted deletions of medial 5p and learning difficulties; Does the cadherin cluster only become penetrant when flanking genes are deleted?

The central portion of the short arm of chromosome 5 is unusual in that large, cytogenetically visible interstitial deletions segregate in families with and without phenotypic consequences. Here we present a family in which a transmitted interstitial deletion of 5p13.3 to 5p14.3 co-segregated with learning and/or behavioral difficulties in six family members. Facial dysmorphism was not striking but a father and daughter both had lacrimal fistulae. The deletion was 12.23 Mb in size (chr5:20,352,535-32,825,775) and contained fifteen known protein coding genes. Five of these (GOLPH3; MTMR12; ZFR; SUB1; and NPR3) and an ultra-conserved microRNA (hsa-miR-579) were present in an 883 kb candidate gene region in 5p13.3 that was deleted in the present family but not in previously reported overlapping benign deletions. Members of the cadherin precursor gene cluster, with brain specific expression, were deleted in both affected and benign deletion families. The candidate genes in 5p13.3 may be sufficient to account for the consistent presence or absence of phenotype in medial 5p deletions. However, we consider the possibility of position effects in which CDH6, and/or other cadherin genes, become penetrant when adjacent genes, or modifiers of gene expression, are also deleted. This could account for the absence of intellectual disability in benign deletions of the cadherin cluster, the cognitive phenotype in medial 5p deletion syndrome and the greater severity of intellectual disability in patients with cri-du-chat syndrome and deletions of 5p15 that extend into the region deleted in the present family.     

Clinical and cytogenetic findings in seven cases of inverted duplication of 8p with evidence of a telomeric deletion using fluorescence in situ hybridization

We report on the clinical and cytogenetic findings in 7 cases of inverted duplication of region 8p11.2-p23. The phenotype of inv dup (8p) compiled from this series and the literature (N = 29) consists of severe mental retardation (100%), minor facial alterations (97%), agenesis of the corpus callosum (80%), hypotonia (66%), orthopedic abnormalities (58%), scoliosis/kyphosis (40%), and congenital heart defect (26%). A telomeric deletion of region 8p23.3-pter was confirmed in 3 of our cases studied using fluorescent in situ hybridization with a telomeric probe for 8p. Thus, these karyotypes are inv dup del(8) (qter→p23.1::p23.1→p11.2:). Our findings sugest that most cases of inv dup(8p) probably have a telomeric deletion. © 1995 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Postzygotic telomere capture causes segmental UPD,duplication and deletion of chromosome 8p in a patient with intellectual disability and obesity

Using SNP array and FISH analysis, a patient with moderate intellectual disability and obesity was found to harbour an atypical 1.6 Mb inverted duplication on 8p23.1, directly flanked by a distally located interstitial deletion of 2.3 Mb and a terminal segmental uniparental disomy. The duplicated and deleted regions lie exactly between the two segmental duplication regions.These segmental duplications on chromosome 8p23.1 are known to be involved in chromosomal rearrangements because of mutual homology and homology to other genomic regions. Genomic instability mediated by these segmental duplications is generally caused by non-allelic homologous recombination, resulting in deletions, reciprocal duplications, inversions and translocations.Additional analysis of the parental origin of the fragments of this atypical inverted duplication/interstitial deletion shows paternal contribution in the maternal derivate chromosome 8. Combined with the finding that the normal chromosome 8 carries an inversion in 8p23.1 we hypothesize that a double strand break in 8p23.1 of the maternal chromosome was postzygotically repaired with the paternal inverted copy resulting in a duplication, deletion and segmental uniparental disomy, with no particular mediation of the 8p23.1 segmental duplication regions in recombination.     

Familial reciprocal translocation, t(2;10)(p24;q26), resulting in duplication 2p and deletion 10q

We describe a familial reciprocal translocation between the distal part of the short arm of chromosome 2 and the long arm of chromosome 10. Five individuals in two generations had multiple congenital anomalies. Their karyotypes were 46, XX or XY,−10, + der(10), t(2;10)(p24;q26). Seven persons were balanced translocation carriers whose karyotypes were 46, XX or XY, t(2;10)(p24;q26). Common manifestations included mental retardation, strabismus, narrow high-arched palate, wide alveolar ridges, other facial abnormalities, genital abnormalities and mutism. The phenotype of the unbalanced individuals is compared to that of previously published cases of the syndrome of partial duplication 2p and to reported patients with partial deletion of 10q.     

Inverted tandem (“mirror”) duplications in human chromosomes: Inv dup 8p, 4q, 22q

We have studied 4 patients with inverted tandem duplications of parts of chromosomes, a hitherto rarely identified from of a structural rearrangement involving a single chromosome in man. In Patients 1 and 2, the duplication involved parts of the short arm of chromosome 8 (regions 8p 12→8p23 and 8p21→8p23, respectively). Both patients manifested certain characteristics of the mosaic trisomy 8 syndrome. Elevated levels of glutathione reductase (GSR) in their erythrocytes supported the interpretation of a partial duplication of chromosome 8 and indicated a regional localization for the GSR gene locus. In Patient 3, the distal half of the long arm of chromosome 4 was duplicated (region4q26→4q35). Clinical evidence supported this interpretation, as Patient 3 resembled phenotypically the 13 reported cases with duplication of the distal 4q. The cytogenetic findings in Patient 4 suggested a possibly inverted duplication of 22q. The clinical correlation was less convincing due to the lack of a well-defined phenotype for trisomy 22. These chromosome aberrations had occurred de novo in all 4 cases. Although they involved different chromosomal regions, they might well have arisen by the same mechanism. Possible modes of origin that are discussed in detail include unequal exchange between homologous chromosomes, between chromatids of 1 chromosome or between strands of 1 DNA duplex.