Temperament-creativity relationships in mood disorder patients, healthy controls and highly creative individuals

OBJECTIVE: To investigate temperament-creativity relationships in euthymic bipolar (BP) and unipolar major depressive (MDD) patients, creative discipline controls (CC), and healthy controls (HC). METHODS: 49 BP, 25 MDD, 32 CC, and 47 HC (all euthymic) completed three self-report temperament/personality measures: the Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R), the Temperament Evaluation of the Memphis, Pisa, Paris, and San Diego Autoquestionnaire (TEMPS-A), and the Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI); and four creativity measures yielding six parameters: the Barron-Welsh Art Scale (BWAS-Total, BWAS-Like, and BWAS-Dislike), the Adjective Check List Creative Personality Scale (ACL-CPS), and the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking--Figural (TTCT-F) and Verbal (TTCT-V) versions. Factor analysis was used to consolidate the 16 subscales from the three temperament/personality measures, and the resulting factors were assessed in relationship to the creativity parameters. RESULTS: Five personality/temperament factors emerged. Two of these factors had prominent relationships with creativity measures. A Neuroticism/Cyclothymia/Dysthymia Factor, comprised mostly of NEO-PI-R-Neuroticism and TEMPS-A-Cyclothymia and TEMPS-A-Dysthymia, was related to BWAS-Total scores (r=0.36, p<0.0001) and BWAS-Dislike subscale scores (r=0.39, p<0.0001). An Openness Factor, comprised mostly of NEO-PI-R-Openness, was related to BWAS-Like subscale scores (r=0.28, p=0.0006), and to ACL-CPS scores (r=0.46, p<0.0001). No significant relationship was found between temperament/personality and TTCT-F and TTCT-V scores. CONCLUSIONS: Neuroticism/Cyclothymia/Dysthymia and Openness appear to have differential relationships with creativity. The former could provide affective (Neuroticism, i.e. access to negative affect, and Cyclothymia, i.e. changeability of affect) and the latter cognitive (flexibility) advantages to enhance creativity. Further studies are indicated to clarify mechanisms of creativity and its relationships to affective processes and bipolar disorders.     

Do cognitive complaints in euthymic bipolar patients reflect objective cognitive impairment?

BACKGROUND: In clinical practice, bipolar patients complain of cognitive deficits such as attentional or memory disturbances. The main aim of this study was to determine whether subjective cognitive complaints were associated with objective neuropsychological impairments. METHOD: Sixty euthymic bipolar patients were assessed through a neuropsychological battery. A structured clinical interview was used to determine subjective cognitive complaints in patients. Thirty healthy controls were also included in the study in order to compare the neuropsychological performance among groups. RESULTS: Bipolar patients with a higher number of episodes, especially the number of mixed episodes, longer duration of the illness and the onset of the illness at an earlier age showed more subjective complaints. Furthermore, bipolar patients with subjective complaints showed lower scores in several cognitive measures related to attention, memory and executive function compared with the control group. Nevertheless, patients without complaints also performed less well than controls in some neuropsychological measures. CONCLUSION: Bipolar patients who were aware of cognitive deficits were more chronic, had presented more previous episodes, especially mixed type, and their illness had started at an earlier age compared with patients who did not complain about cognitive problems. Moreover, patients with good cognitive insight also had a poorer social and occupational functioning as well as a poorer neuropsychological performance. However, the bipolar group without complaints also obtained lower scores in several tests compared with healthy controls. Cognitive status of bipolar patients should be routinely assessed, regardless of the patients awareness about their cognitive deficits.     

Bipolar disorder: balancing mood states early in course of illness effects long-term prognosis

The importance of observing swings above euthymic normality in patients with affective disorders has been emphasized by many research groups. The concept of mood bipolarity has not only established a Bipolar II disorder (with only hypomania, not mania, but also opened up for discussion of a Bipolar Spectrum, that would necessitate treatment with a broader range of agents, i.e., not only antidepressants. In order to understand the determinants of the patterns of mood swings in individuals with bipolar disorder we have used a computerized life-charting technique to analyze a large amount of clinical information in 100 patients with bipolar mood swings. In a cross-sectional set-up, we demonstrate clear evidence of achieving a better long-term stabilization when starting patients on mood stabilizer early after the first evidence of the mood disorder.     

Experience of subjective symptoms in euthymic patients with bipolar disorder

Bipolar patients often experience subjective symptoms even if they do not have active psychotic symptoms in their euthymic state. Most studies about subjective symptoms are conducted in schizophrenia, and there are few studies involving bipolar patients. We examined the nature of the subjective symptoms of bipolar patients in their euthymic state, and we also compared it to that of schizophrenia and normal control. Thirty bipolar patients, 25 patients with schizophrenia, and 21 normal control subjects were included. Subjective symptoms were assessed using the Korean version of the Frankfurter Beschwerde Fragebogen (K-FBF) and the Symptom Check List 90-R (SCL90-R). Euthymic state was confirmed by assessing objective psychopathology with the Positive and Negative Syndrome scale of Schizophrenia (PANSS), the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS), and the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). K-FBF score was significantly higher in bipolar patients than in normal controls, but similar to that in schizophrenia patients (F=5.86, p=0.004, R2=2033.6). In contrast, SCL90-R scores did not differ significantly among the three groups. Euthymic bipolar patients experience subjective symptoms that are more confined to cognitive domain. This finding supports the hypothesis that subtle cognitive impairments persists in euthymic bipolar patients.     

Cardiovascular risk factors in affective disorder

100 patients with affective disorder (unipolar affective disorder and bipolar affective disorder) were evaluated for evidence of increased risk for the major cardiovascular risk factors including hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, obesity, and cigarette use. Unipolar affective disorder patients showed no evidence of increased cardiovascular risk compared to population controls. Bipolar affective disorder patients displayed increased systolic blood pressure, definite hypertension, and use of cigarettes. These findings are consistent with a link between affective disorders and excess cardiovascular mortality.     

Trait impulsivity in patients with mood disorders

BACKGROUND: Impulsivity is a key component of the manic behavior of bipolar disorder and is reported to occur in bipolar patients as a stable characteristic, i.e. a trait. Nevertheless, impulsivity has not been widely studied in depressed bipolar patients. We assessed impulsivity in depressed and euthymic bipolar and unipolar patients and healthy controls. We hypothesized that bipolar subjects would have higher levels of trait impulsivity than the comparison groups. METHODS: Twenty-four depressed bipolar, 24 depressed unipolar, 12 euthymic bipolar, and 10 euthymic unipolar patients, as well as 51 healthy subjects were evaluated with the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS). Analysis of covariance with age and sex as covariates was used to compare mean group differences. RESULTS: Depressed bipolar, euthymic bipolar, and depressed unipolar patients did not differ, and showed greater impulsivity than healthy controls on all of the BIS scales. Euthymic unipolar patients scored higher than healthy controls only on motor impulsivity. LIMITATIONS: Higher number of past substance abusers in the bipolar groups, and no control for anxiety and personality disorders, as well as small sample sizes, limit the reach of this study. CONCLUSIONS: This study replicates prior findings of stable trait impulsivity in bipolar disorder patients, and extends them, confirming that this trait can be demonstrated in depressed patients, as well as manic and euthymic ones. Trait impulsivity may be the result of repeated mood episodes or be present prior to their onset, either way it would influence the clinical presentation of bipolar disorder.     

High harm avoidance and low self-directedness in euthymic young adults with recurrent, early-onset depression

BACKGROUND: The personality dimensions of harm avoidance (HA) and self-directedness (SD), as measured by the Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI), have been widely associated with depression and there is preliminary evidence that they may represent trait markers for depression. However, many studies in this area are limited by the use of heterogeneous samples of depressed patients and by the confounding effect of depressed mood during personality testing. The current study compares TCI personality dimension scores in a group of euthymic young adults with recurrent early-onset major depressive disorder (RE-MDD) to well-matched euthymic controls. METHODS: Fifty-two young adults with a past history of RE-MDD were recruited from consecutive referrals to a psychiatric clinic at a university health service. Eighty nine controls were also recruited. Euthymia was established in patients by a score of less than 9 on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) and in controls by a Becks Depression Inventory (BDI) score of less than 10. All participants completed the TCI-125. RESULTS: Patients and controls were well matched in terms of sociodemographic profile. Euthymic RE-MDD patients scored significantly higher than controls on the temperament dimension of harm avoidance (HA; mean score 14.5 versus 7.8, p<0.0001) and significantly lower than controls on the character dimension of self-directedness (SD; mean score 14.1 versus 19.9, p<0.0001). Covariance analysis suggested that both HA and SD contributed independently to the familial risk of depression. LIMITATIONS: Subjects and controls all came from relatively affluent social backgrounds-these findings may not generalise to more socioeconomically diverse populations. The possibility of a 'scarring effect' of depressive episodes on self-reported personality dimension scores cannot be excluded. CONCLUSIONS: High HA and low SD represent trait markers for liability to recurrent major depressive disorder in young adults. Further research is needed to replicate these findings and to assess the contribution that the experience of depressive episodes makes to self-reported personality dimension scores.     

Exercise tolerance is reduced in bipolar illness

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease is 2-3 times more common in bipolar patients than the general population. Asymptomatic bipolar patients have electrocardiogram abnormalities at high rates. The question of heart function in asymptomatic bipolar subjects arises. METHODS: This study examined the impact of exhaustive exercise on cardiac function in untrained euthymic bipolar and control subjects. Twenty-four non-athletic adults, 10 controls and 14 with bipolar type I, exercised on a treadmill at 70% of maximal oxygen consumption until physical exhaustion. Two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography were performed before and immediately after exercise. RESULTS: Bipolar subjects had significantly reduced exercise duration (75.9+/-40.5min for bipolar and 95.0+/-40.1 min for control, P<0.01). There were no statistical differences between bipolar illness and normal controls in echocardiographic variables either at rest or after exhaustive exercise. CONCLUSION: Medically asymptomatic, euthymic bipolar subjects appear to have reduced exercise tolerance but normal cardiac function. LIMITATIONS: More bipolar patients smoked (28.6% vs. 0% controls) and patients tended to be heavier (189.1+/-29.3 vs. 165.0+/-29.5 lb, t=2.0, P=0.06). None of the normal controls were taking any medications. These variables could have impacted the reduced exercise tolerance.     

Bipolar mood disorders among Polish psychiatric outpatients treated for major depression

BACKGROUND: Significant proportion of patients treated for depression may have various types of bipolar mood disorders. The aim of the study was to assess the frequency of bipolar disorders among outpatients having at least one major depressive episode, treated by 96 psychiatrists, representing all regions of Poland. METHODS: The study included 880 patients (237 male, 643 female), identified to following diagnostic categories: bipolar I, bipolar II, bipolar spectrum disorder and major depressive disorder. RESULTS: Bipolar mood disorders were found in 61.2% of patients studied, bipolar I more frequent in men and bipolar II in women, and bipolar spectrum in 12% of patients. Patients with age ranges 19-49 and 50-65 years did not differ as to the percentage of diagnostic categories. Patients with bipolar mood disorders compared to major depressive disorder had significantly more frequent family history of bipolar disorder, premorbid hyper- or cyclothymic personality, early onset of depression, symptoms of hypersomnia and hyperphagia, psychotic depression, post-partum depression, and treatment-resistant depression. Bipolar spectrum patients had most clinical features similar to classic types of bipolar disorders. LIMITATIONS: Neither structured interview for family history, nor formal criteria for a number of clinical manifestations were used. The population treated by psychiatrists may not be representative and present a subgroup with more severe mood disorders. CONCLUSIONS: Bipolar mood disorders may be very prevalent among depressive outpatients treated by psychiatrists in Poland, which is confirmed by the results of recent studies. Bipolar patients (including bipolar spectrum) significantly differ from major depressive disorder as to numerous clinical features related mostly to depressive episode.     

Temperamental commonalities and differences in euthymic mood disorder patients, creative controls, and healthy controls

OBJECTIVE: Understanding of mood disorders can be enhanced through assessment of temperamental traits. We explored temperamental commonalities and differences among euthymic bipolar (BP) and unipolar (MDD) mood disorder patients, creative discipline graduate student controls (CC), and healthy controls (HC). METHODS: Forty-nine BP, 25 MDD, 32 CC, and 47 HC completed self-report temperament/personality measures including: The Affective Temperament Evaluation of Memphis, Pisa, Paris and San Diego (TEMPS-A); the Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R); and the Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI). RESULTS: Euthymic BP, MDD, and CC, compared to HC, had significantly increased cyclothymia, dysthymia and irritability scores on TEMPS-A; increased neuroticism and decreased conscientiousness on NEO-PI-R; and increased harm avoidance and novelty seeking as well as decreased self-directedness on TCI. TEMPS-A cyclothymia scores were significantly higher in BP than in MDD. NEO-PI-R openness was increased in BP and CC, compared to HC, and in CC compared to MDD. TCI self-transcendence scores in BP were significantly higher than in MDD, CC, and HC. LIMITATIONS: Most of the subjects were not professional artists, and represented many fields; temperament might be different in different art fields. CONCLUSIONS: Euthymic BP, MDD, and CC compared to HC, had prominent temperamental commonalities. However, BP and CC had the additional commonality of increased openness compared to HC. BP had particularly high Cyclothymia scores that were significantly higher then those of MDD. The prominent BP-CC overlap suggests underlying neurobiological commonalities between people with mood disorders and individuals involved in creative disciplines, consistent with the notion of a temperamental contribution to enhanced creativity in individuals with bipolar disorders.     

Cognitive and motor features in elderly people with bipolar disorder

BACKGROUND: Although elderly people will represent one third of the bipolar population in a few years, data about cognitive and motor features in these patients are very scarce. The aim of this study was to compare the cognitive and motor functioning between elderly euthymic patients with bipolar disorder (BD) and healthy controls, as well as to determine the degree of correlation with psychosocial functioning. METHODS: Euthymic older adults with BD (n=20) and healthy controls (n=20) were evaluated with traditional clinical instruments and measures of exposure to psychotropic drugs and extrapyramidal symptoms. All subjects completed an extensive neuropsychological battery. RESULTS: Patients with BD had more extrapyramidal symptoms and worse performance than healthy controls in psychomotor speed, verbal memory, and executive functions even after controlling sub-clinical symptomatology. These findings were not associated with age at onset or length of illness or with current pharmacological exposure. Psychosocial functioning correlated negatively with performance in psychomotor speed and executive function, and with extrapyramidal symptoms. LIMITATIONS: The small sample size and cross-sectional design. CONCLUSIONS: Older adult patients with BD in a euthymic state could have a similar cognitive and motor profile to that described in younger euthymic bipolar patients. Cognitive-motor disturbances may help to explain impairments in daily functioning among elderly patients with bipolar disorder during remission.     

Comorbid disorders in patients with bipolar disorder and concomitant substance dependence

OBJECTIVE: Substance dependence is common in bipolar disorder and is associated with an increase in Axis I and II comorbidity. Little research has compared the relative rates of comorbidity among bipolar patients with dependence on different substances. METHODS: The Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) was used to assess 166 outpatients involved in one of three clinical trials of medications for bipolar disorder and substance dependence. Patients had concurrent alcohol dependence, cocaine dependence, or both conditions. RESULTS: Generalized anxiety disorder and current depressed mood were significantly more common in bipolar patients with alcohol dependence than bipolar patients with cocaine dependence. Those with cocaine dependence had significantly higher rates of post-traumatic stress disorder and antisocial personality disorder and were more likely to present in a mixed mood state than patients dependent on alcohol. Cocaine ENC dependent patients were more likely than alcohol dependent patients to have Bipolar I relative to Bipolar II. LIMITATIONS: This is a retrospective, cross-sectional data analysis using the MINI for diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Cocaine dependence and alcohol dependence were associated with different clinical features and comorbid disorders in bipolar patients. The results may help confirm the validity of integrative models of mood, behavioral, anxiety, and personality disorders. Further studies on the causal relationship between substance dependence and concurrent and lifetime Axis I disorders for patients with bipolar disorders are indicated.     

Dysfunctional assumptions in bipolar disorder

BACKGROUND: Despite the initial encouraging outcome in developing CBT for bipolar affective disorder [Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 2002 (in press); Psychol. Med. 31 (2001) 459-467], very little is known about whether there are any differences in dysfunctional attitudes between unipolar and bipolar patients. Both the behavioural activation system theory [J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 67 (1994) 488-498; Major Theories of Personality Disorder, Guilford Press, New York, 1996; Psychol. Bull. 117 (1995) 434-449] and the cognitive model for bipolar affective disorder [Cognitive Therapy for Bipolar Disorder: A Therapist's Guide to Concepts, Methods and Practise, Wiley, New York, 1999] postulate high goal striving as a risk factor for bipolar disorder. However, the existing subscales in the dysfunctional attitude scale (DAS) were derived from patients and relatives of patients suffering from unipolar depression, patients with a mixed psychiatric diagnosis or normal controls. None of the existing subscales reflects high goal striving beliefs. Using a sample of bipolar patients may yield different factors. METHODS: A total of 143 bipolar 1 patients filled in the short version of DAS 24. Principal component analysis was carried out to derive factors. The scores of these factors were compared with those of 109 unipolar patients to investigate if these factors distinguish bipolar patients from unipolar patients. RESULTS: Three factors were derived: factor 1 'Goal-attainment' accounted for 25.0% of the total variance. Factor 2 'Dependency' accounted for 11.0% of the total variance. Factor 3 'Achievement' accounted for 8.2% of the total variance. However, factor 1 appeared to consist of items that made a coherent theoretical construct. No significant differences were found when the validation sample was compared with 109 patients suffering from unipolar depression in any of the three factors. When subjects who were likely to be in a major depressive episode were excluded, the scores of bipolar patients (n=49) were significantly higher than euthymic unipolar patients (n=25) in factor 1 'Goal attainment'. Goal-attainment also correlated with the number of past hospitalisations due to manic episodes and to bipolar episodes as a whole. CONCLUSIONS: The Goal-attainment subscale captures the risky attitudes described by the behavioural activation system theory and the cognitive model for bipolar affective disorder. It is postulated that these beliefs may interact with the illness and predispose bipolar patients to have a more severe course of the illness.     

Age of onset in affective disorder: its correlation with hereditary and psychosocial factors

BACKGROUND: Affective disorders probably have a multifactorial aetiology, both biological and psychosocial factors may be of importance at onset as well as at relapses. The aim of the study was to investigate how the age of onset of bipolar and unipolar disorder relates to family history of affective disorder, early parental separation and life events. A second purpose of this study was to analyze the importance of life events preceding the first and subsequent episodes of affective disorder. METHODS: The case records of 282 patients (161 females/121 males; mean age 56) were investigated. They all had a DSM-IV based diagnosis of either bipolar I/II (67%) or unipolar (33%) disorder. Variables, such as family history, early parental loss and life events according to Paykel life events scale, were examined. RESULTS: We found a significantly lower age of onset in bipolar patients with a family history of affective disorder (28.9 vs. 33.9 years). Bipolar patients with preceding life events had a higher age of onset (33.1 vs. 28.3 years). Moreover, bipolar patients with heredity, had less life events at onset. For the bipolar, as well as the unipolar group, life stressors more frequently preceded the first episode of affective disorder than the subsequent episodes. Limitations: The major limitation of this study is the retrospective approach, with e.g. difficulties to decide whether a life event plays a role in aetiology of affective disorder or is its consequence. CONCLUSIONS: Bipolar patients with high constitutional vulnerability have an earlier age of onset and need less stress factors to become ill. Better knowledge about the stress- and the vulnerability-factors in affective disorder might contribute to development of individually tailored therapeutic strategies in future.     

Comparison of cognitive functions between first- and multi-episode bipolar affective disorders

BACKGROUND: Cognitive impairment has been commonly found in euthymic patients with bipolar affective disorder (BPAD). Information about onset and course of cognitive deficits is, however, scarce. This study examined the cognitive profile of patients following their first episode of BPAD to determine whether cognitive problems are present at such an early stage. METHODS: Executive functions, memory, IQ, attention-concentration and perceptuomotor function were assessed in 16 euthymic patients with BPAD following their first episodes, and compared with a group of 30 euthymic patients with multiple episodes of BPAD and 20 normal controls. Comparisons were controlled for educational status, current IQ and residual symptoms. RESULTS: First-episode patients were significantly impaired, compared to normal controls, on tests of executive function, sustained attention, perceptuomotor function and IQ. Additionally, their performance was significantly worse than patients with multi-episode BPAD on tests of executive functions, sustained attention and perceptuomotor function. Multi-episode patients had impaired memory, compared to normal controls, and performed poorly on a subtest of executive functions compared to first-episode patients. LIMITATIONS: Sample sizes were small, assessments cross-sectional; all confounds could not be controlled for. CONCLUSIONS: Widespread cognitive disturbances following the first episode of BPAD were found in this study. Whether these disturbances progress following repeated episodes was not entirely clear. Since cognitive impairment can have several adverse consequences for patients of BPAD in terms of disability, quality of life, outcome etc., this must remain a priority area for future research.     

Cognitive vulnerability in patients with bipolar disorder

BACKGROUND: No study has simultaneously explored key components of Beck's model of cognitive vulnerability to depression in people with bipolar disorders. METHODS: We compared 41 euthymic bipolar patients with 20 healthy control subjects. All subjects were assessed on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, the Autobiographical Memory Test and the Mean Ends Problem-Solving procedure and also completed the Beck Depression Inventory, the Dysfunctional Attitude Scale, the Sociotropy Autonomy Scale and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Questionnaire. RESULTS: In comparison to control subjects, patients with bipolar disorder demonstrated significantly higher levels of dysfunctional attitudes (particularly perfectionism and need for approval) and sociotropy, significantly greater over-general recall on an autobiographical memory test and significantly less ability to generate solutions to social problem-solving tasks. These between group differences remained significant when age, intelligence, latency to respond to autobiographical memory test cue words, and subjective mood ratings were included as co-variates in the statistical analysis. Within the patient group, cognitive dysfunction was significantly correlated with level of morbidity (as measured by number of previous illness episodes). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that cognitive vulnerability in patients with bipolar disorder is similar to that described in unipolar disorders. It is not clear whether this dysfunction is a cause or an effect of repeated episodes of bipolar disorder. However, the findings may have implications for clinical treatment as well as suggesting a number of important new avenues of research into psychological models of affective disorder.     

Head injury as a risk factor for bipolar affective disorder

BACKGROUND: Case reports have associated head injury with psychoses including affective disorders, but little is known regarding head injury as a risk factor for the onset of bipolar affective disorder. METHODS: The Danish Psychiatric Case Register and the Danish National Patients Register were linked together with the Danish Population Register, thus identifying 10,242 patients with bipolar affective disorder, and 102,420 matched controls. History regarding head injury was recorded from the National Patients Register data. Data were analysed using conditional logistic regression. RESULTS: Bipolar affective disorder was associated with an increased risk of a history of head injury (IRR=1.55; 95% CI 1.36-1.77). The increased risk was confined to head injury occurring less than 5 years before the first psychiatric admission. The finding could not be ascribed to increased accident proneness (as evaluated through the occurrence of other fractures not involving the skull). LIMITATIONS: In studies based on clinical diagnoses only and limited to patients who were hospitalised for psychiatric disorder, exposure was limited to injuries leading to admission to hospital. CONCLUSIONS: Head injury may be a contributing factor to the onset of bipolar affective illness. However, this factor is probably only relevant to a relatively small minority of cases.     

Cognitive functioning in patients with familial bipolar I disorder and their unaffected relatives

BACKGROUND: Impairments in verbal learning and memory, executive functions and attention are manifest in some euthymic patients with bipolar disorder (BPD). However, evidence is sparse on their putative role as aetiologically important genetic vulnerability markers for the disorder. This population-based study examined the cognitive functions of affected and unaffected individuals in families with BPD. The aim was to discover whether any cognitive function would indicate genetic liability to the disorder and could thus be regarded as endophenotypes of BPD. METHOD: A diagnostic interview and a neuropsychological test battery were administered to 32 familial bipolar I disorder patients, 40 of their unaffected first-degree relatives and 55 controls, all representing population-based samples. RESULTS: Unaffected first-degree relatives showed impairment in psychomotor performance speed and slight impairment in executive function. Bipolar patients were impaired in verbal learning and memory compared with unaffected relatives and controls. They also differed from controls in tasks of executive functions. There were no difference between the groups in simple attention and working memory tasks. CONCLUSIONS: Impaired psychomotor performance speed and executive function may represent endophenotypes of BPD, reflecting possible underlying vulnerability to the disorder. Verbal memory impairments appear to be more related to the fully developed disorder.     

Cognitive functions and cognitive styles in young euthymic patients with bipolar I disorder

Background

Recent evidences suggest that bipolar disorder patients do not return to premorbid functioning levels during the inter-episode periods. Cognitive deficits may impair patients working and functioning status and may also have negative impact on other aspects of thinking.

Objectives

To assess the prevalence of cognitive dysfunction in patients with bipolar disorder in euthymic state and to explore any evident cognitive style problems.

Method

Case-control naturalistic study 60 patients with bipolar I disorder in euthymic state according to DSM-IV were recruited and subdivided into two groups each contains of 30 patients; (Group BPM) euthymic patients with recent manic episode, and Group BPD euthymic patients with recent depressive episode. Both groups were further compared with control group (Group C) consisted of 30 frequency matched healthy volunteers. Groups were subjected to the following: 1-clinical psychiatric examination, 2-Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD-17) and Bech–Rafaelsen Melancholia Scale (MES) for patients’ group (BPD), 3-Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) and Bech–Rafaelsen Mania Scale (MAS) for patients’ group (BPM), 4-assessment of euthymic state of mood included both MAS and MES, 5-MMSE, MTS and CDT were performed to assess cognitive functions, 6-cognitive styles evaluation included Fear of Failure, Hopelessness Scale, (the Social Dysfunction and Aggression Scale SDAS-9 and Arabic Anger Scale.

Results

Definite cognitive function impairment and different patterns of cognitive style were detected in case groups. MMSE, MTS and CDT scores were statistically significant. Fear of Failure Scale Scores were higher in BPM; 16 (53.33%) reported severe intensity compared to 16 (53.33%) of BPD Group reporting moderate intensity and 30 (100%) of the control group reporting only mild intensity of fear of failure with statistically significant differences. Although patients were in euthymic state; Hopelessness Scale discriminated between those with affective disorders and controls and other scores for hostility SADS-9 and Arabic Anger Scale. Moreover, measures of cognitive styles showed differences among patients of the case groups who joined psychotherapy program in their management (28) compared to those who did not (32).

Limitation

Cognitive impact of psychotropic drugs could not be eliminated since the current study is naturalistic study.

Conclusions

Those with BAD in euthymic state suffer from cognitive dysfunction and some aspects of cognitive styles that may negatively interfere with their performance. Psychotherapeutic programs should consider these findings in their approaches for better impact on patients’ quality of life and overall treatment outcome.     

双相情感障碍患者人格特征的初步研究

双相情感障碍是一组常见的重性精神病 ,其主要的临床特征为反复发作的躁狂或抑郁 ,间歇期正常 ,预后良好。它的发病原因尚不完全清楚 ,临床观察和研究提示与病前的人格特征有一定的关系。如发现双相情感障碍患者比正常人外向 ,神经质 ,强迫 ,追求完美 ,开放[1- 5] 。由于双相情感障碍的患病率低 ,如国内流行病学调查表明只有 0 .0 76% [6] ,而且双相情感障碍的预后较好 ,有明显的间歇期 ,间歇期间临床症状消失 ,而且有研究表明双相情感障碍患者所测量的病前人格和间歇期的测量结果没有差异[4 ] ,所以通常把患者间歇期获得的人格特征作为其人…