An evaluation of Doppler ultrasound and photoplethysmography in the investigation of venous insufficiency.

Non-invasive methods of venous assessment have been developed to improve diagnostic accuracy in the assessment of venous insufficiency. Of these, continuous wave Doppler (CWD) ultrasound and photoplethysmography are the cheapest and most simple to perform. In this study duplex scanning was used to test the accuracy of these two methods. One hundred and thirty-six patients attending the venous outpatient clinic at Middlesex Hospital, London were examined by all three techniques and a diagnosis was reached using each technique. The technicians performing the examinations were unaware of the diagnoses reached by the other methods. Continuous wave Doppler ultrasound was found to be most accurate in the diagnosis of long saphenous incompetence (sensitivity 73%, specificity 85%). Due to the variability of venous anatomy at the popliteal fossa and the 'blindness' of the technique, it was inaccurate in the diagnosis of short saphenous incompetence (sensitivity 33%) and deep vein reflux (sensitivity 48%). Photoplethysmography was found to be most accurate in the diagnosis of deep vein reflux (sensitivity 79%, specificity 70%) but was inaccurate in identification of the site of superficial vein reflux. Inaccuracies may be attributed to the presence of incompetent perforating veins and variation in arterial inflow.     

Valvular incompetence in superficial, deep and perforator veins of limbs with varicose veins

Venous valvular incompetence was investigated with Doppler technique in 296 limbs with untreated primary varicose veins. Partial or complete insufficiency of the long saphenous vein was found in 95%. Six patterns of incompetence of this vein could be distinguished. Insufficiency of the short saphenous vein was present in 15% of the limbs and perforator incompetence in 45%. Femoral and/or popliteal vein reflux was found in 20% of the limbs. In eight limbs (2.7%) with verified primary deep venous insufficiency there was a moderate or severe degree of femoral and popliteal venous reflux. Skin changes secondary to the venous disease were present in 18% of the limbs, mainly those with incompetence of perforator and long saphenous veins. Doppler investigation of varicose limbs give valuable information and can be recommended as a standard pre-treatment test.     

Errors in the differential diagnosis of incompetence of the popliteal vein and short saphenous vein by Doppler ultrasound

Doppler Ultrasound is now routinely used to demonstrate valvular reflux in the venous system. Incompetence detected at the back of the knee is located either in the short saphenous vein or in the popliteal vein. Whether the incompetence is in the deep or superficial venous system can be differentiated by digital compression over the short saphenous vein in the upper calf; if reflux is abolished then the incompetence is assumed to be in the superficial vein but if it is not prevented it must be in the popliteal vein. Sometimes the reflux is not controlled when the deep system is normal. This has been shown to be due to variations in the anatomy of the short saphenous vein and especially the pattern of its termination. Examples with venography are given, showing that in the presence of incompetence at the sapheno-popliteal junction there may be no reflux in the short saphenous vein; instead the proximal tributaries are involved and reflux in these veins is not controlled by pressure over the short saphenous vein. This explains the false positive diagnosis of valvular incompetence in the popliteal vein.     

Correction of lower extremity deep venous incompetence by ablation of superficial venous reflux

Chronic venous insufficiency which produces lipodermatosclerosis, varicosities, or ulceration, is frequently caused by superficial venous reflux and deep venous incompetence. The anatomy of venous insufficiency has been clarified with duplex ultrasound, thus allowing appropriately directed therapy. However, postoperative venous physiology in patients undergoing superficial venous ablation has been infrequently reported. This study was undertaken to document the effect of superficial venous ablation on deep venous reflux. Between April 1994 and May 1995, 45 patients were examined preoperatively with duplex ultrasound. All patients had symptomatic venous insufficiency and were found to have greater saphenous vein reflux. Clinical classification of venous insufficiency (according to the criteria of the joint councils of the vascular societies) included class I in 30 patients, class II in 12, and class III in 3. Seventeen patients (38%) had reflux in the femoral venous system in addition to superficial reflux. All patients underwent removal of the proximal greater saphenous vein in concert with multiple stab avulsions of identified varicosities. Postoperative interrogation of the venous system revealed that in 16 (94%) of 17 patients, coexistent femoral venous insufficiency completely resolved. Thus ablation of superficial venous reflux eliminated incompetence in the deep venous system in patients with combined disease. These preliminary results suggest that superficial venous incompetence may be a cause of deep venous insufficiency. Whereas alternative methods to correct deep venous insufficiency have met with limited success, it appears that saphenectomy (when combined disease is present) may be effective in correction of deep venous reflux.Presented at the Twentieth Annual Meeting of the Peripheral Vascular Surgery Society, New Orleans, La., June 10, 1995.     

Deep axial reflux, an important contributor to skin changes or ulcer in chronic venous disease

OBJECTIVE: We undertook this cross-sectional study to investigate the distribution of venous reflux and effect of axial reflux in superficial and deep veins and to determine the clinical value of quantifying peak reverse flow velocity and reflux time in limbs with chronic venous disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four hundred one legs (127 with skin changes, 274 without skin changes) in 272 patients were examined with duplex ultrasound scanning, and peak reverse flow velocity and reflux time were measured. Both parameters were graded on a scale of 0 to 4. The sum of reverse flow scores was calculated from seven venous segments, three in superficial veins (great saphenous vein at saphenofemoral junction, great saphenous vein below knee, small saphenous vein) and four in deep veins (common femoral vein, femoral vein, deep femoral vein, popliteal vein). Axial reflux was defined as reflux in the great saphenous vein above and below the knee or in the femoral vein to the popliteal vein below the knee. Reflux parameters and presence or absence of axial reflux in superficial or deep veins were correlated with prevalence of skin changes or ulcer (CEAP class 4-6). RESULTS: The most common anatomic presentation was incompetence in all three systems (superficial, deep, perforator; 46%) or in superficial or perforator veins (28%). Isolated reflux in one system only was rare (15%; superficial, 28 legs; deep, 14 legs; perforator, 18 legs). Deep venous incompetence was present in 244 legs (61%). If common femoral vein reflux was excluded, prevalence of deep venous incompetence was 52%. The cause, according to findings at duplex ultrasound scanning, was primary in 302 legs (75%) and secondary in 99 legs (25%). Presence of axial deep venous reflux increased significantly with prevalence of skin changes or ulcer (C4-C6; odds ratio [OR], 2.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.56-4.67). Of 110 extremities with incompetent popliteal vein, 81 legs had even femoral vein reflux, with significantly more skin changes or ulcer, compared with 29 legs with popliteal reflux alone (P =.025). Legs with skin changes or ulcer had significantly higher total peak reverse flow velocity (P =.006), but the difference for total reflux time did not reach significance (P =.084) compared with legs without skin changes. In contrast, presence of axial reflux in superficial veins did not increase prevalence of skin changes (OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.44-1.2). Incompetent perforator veins were observed as often in patients with no skin changes (C0-C3, 215 of 274, 78%) as in patients with skin changes (C4-C6, 106 of 127, 83%; P =.25). CONCLUSION: Continuous axial deep venous reflux is a major contributor to increased prevalence of skin changes or ulcer in patients with chronic venous disease compared with segmental deep venous reflux above or below the knee only. The total peak reverse flow velocity score is significantly higher in patients with skin changes or ulcer. It is questionable whether peak reverse flow velocity and reflux time can be used to quantify venous reflux; however, if they are used, peak reverse flow velocity seems to reflect venous malfunction more appropriately.     

Prevalence of varicose veins and venous anatomy in patients without truncal saphenous reflux.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence and distribution of primary venous reflux in the lower limbs in patients without truncal saphenous reflux. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One thousand and seven hundred and twelve patients with suspected venous disease were examined by duplex ultrasonography. Seven hundred and thirty-five patients had primary varicose veins with competent saphenous trunks. Limbs with truncal saphenous reflux, deep vein reflux or obstruction, previous injection sclerotherapy or vein surgery, arterial disease and inflammation of non-venous origin were excluded from further consideration. The CEAP classification system was used for clinical staging. Systematic duplex ultrasound examination was undertaken to assess the distribution of incompetent saphenous tributaries. RESULTS: The prevalence of primary reflux with competent saphenous trunks was 43%. Reflux of GSV calf tributaries was the most common. The majority of the limbs (96%) belonged to chronic venous disease classes C1 and C2 of the CEAP classification. CONCLUSIONS: Superficial venous reflux causing varicose veins in the presence competent saphenous trunks is very prevalent in this series in contrast to other studies, presumably reflecting differing patient populations. Our data clearly show that varicose veins may occur in any vein and do not depend on truncal saphenous incompetence. Careful duplex ultrasound evaluation allows the pattern of venous reflux to be established in this group of patient ensuring appropriate management of varices.     

The role of popliteal vein incompetence in the diagnosis of saphenous-popliteal reflux using continuous wave doppler.

INTRODUCTION: continuous wave Doppler (CWD) has good discriminatory power at the groin in the assessment of saphenous femoral junction (SFJ); however, it is not as accurate as duplex ultrasound scanning (DUS) in the popliteal fossa for assessment of saphenous popliteal junction (SPJ) in patients with primary short saphenous vein incompetence. AIM: the aim of this study was to compare the findings of CWD with those of DUS at the SPJ and assess the role of popliteal vein incompetence in the accuracy of CWD. METHOD: prospective study of consecutive patients presenting to a vein clinic requiring a duplex scan of their SPJ. Each patient was examined by one surgeon using CWD and by one radiologist using DUS. Each observer was unaware of the other's findings. Additional information on the competence of the popliteal vein on DUS was also recorded. RESULTS: some 171 limbs in 128 patients with varicose veins were studied. One hundred and sixteen limbs had reflux at SPJ on CWD whilst 55 did not. Their mean age was 54 (range 18-85). Female to male ratio was 3:1. Spearman's rank correlation between CWD and DUS has 0.49 (p =0.0001). CWD has a sensitivity of 92% and specificity of 53% (PPV=62%, NPV=89%, accuracy=70%). Twenty-nine limbs had an incompetent popliteal vein (IPV). Of those, 12 limbs also had incompetence on CWD and competence on DUS at the SPJ, which represent 28% of the total number of limbs with these findings (n =43). CONCLUSION: CWD is sensitive in detecting incompetence at SPJ, though its specificity is low. In this study 17% (n =29) of all patients had incompetence of popliteal vein. Up to 25% ( n =12) of patients with SPJ incompetence on CWD (Doppler +) and competence on DUS (duplex -) had incompetence of the underlying popliteal vein, which may explain the low specificity. The presence of SPJ incompetence on CWD should be confirmed on DUS prior to surgery.     

Reflux patterns in the ovarian and hypogastric veins in patients with varicose veins and signs of pelvic venous incompetence

Patients with varicose veins who also had clinical and/or duplex ultrasound findings suspicious of pelvic venous incompetence (PVI) underwent selective retrograde catheter phlebography of the pelvic veins. One hundred and one patients (all female, mean age 49.3 years) underwent selective phlebography of the pelvic veins. In 68 cases (67.3%) a varicose vein recurrence after previous stripping of the greater saphenous vein was present, and about half the patients (n=45, 44.6%) were multipara ( > or =2 episodes of childbirth). The presence and extent of any reflux was documented and the ovarian and pelvic veins affected by the reflux were recorded. Retrograde selective phlebography demonstrated a PVI in 75 patients (74.2%). The left ovarian vein and the right hypogastric vein were most frequently affected by reflux (n = 41, 54.6% each). The left hypogastric vein was incompetent in 35 patients (46.6%) and the right ovarian vein in 3 cases (4%). In about half the patients with pelvic venous incompetence, reflux was demonstrated in more than one of the main pelvic veins (n=38, 50.6%). Fifty-one (68%) of the 75 patients with pelvic venous incompetence had varicose vein recurrence after previous stripping of the greater saphenous vein. Extension of the reflux into varicose veins of the groin or lower leg was demonstrated in 44 patients (58.6%). Thirty-nine patients (52%) received treatment for their pelvic venous incompetence (coil embolisation, sclerotherapy or videoscopic ovarian vein ligation). Pelvic venous reflux was present in 75% of our study population. Combined reflux in more than one pelvic vein was common and in about 60% of cases the pelvic reflux was shown to feed varicose veins of the legs. Therefore, typical clinical and/or duplex findings should lead to a strong suspicion of pelvic venous incompetence and reduce the need for selective retrograde catheter phlebography in this selected group of patients.     

Ambulatory venous pressure revisited

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to describe a method for measuring the deep venous pressure changes in the lower extremity and compare it with those obtained in the dorsal foot vein. METHODS: After cannulation of the posterior tibial vein, a catheter with a pressure transducer in its tip was inserted and placed at the knee joint level. The dorsal foot vein was also cannulated. Pressures were recorded simultaneously at both sites during toe stands and repeated with the probe in the upper, middle, and lower calf. RESULTS: The study was performed in 45 patients with signs and symptoms of chronic venous insufficiency. Duplex Doppler scanning and ascending and descending venography performed before pressure measurements revealed saphenous vein incompetence in 11 lower extremities, incompetent perforators in 11 extremities (eight were combined with saphenous incompetence), and marked compression of popliteal vein with plantar flexion in 28 extremities. No significant deep axial reflux was observed on duplex Doppler examination or descending venography. No morphologic outflow obstruction was detected. The mean deep pressure at the knee joint level fell during toe stands, -15% +/- 27 (SD), and the mean dorsal foot vein pressure drop was even more marked, -75% +/- 22 (SD). Although the exercise pressure in the dorsal foot vein decreased in all patients (range, 13-90% drop), the popliteal vein pressure increased (4-72%) in nine limbs, decreased only marginally if at all in 15 limbs (0-15%), and fell more markedly in 21 extremities (22-65%). Deep vein recovery time was considerably shorter overall as compared with the findings by the dorsal vein measurement. In the comparison of limbs with and without superficial reflux, the recovery times in the deep system were significantly shorter in limbs with superficial incompetence. CONCLUSION: Ambulatory dorsal foot venous pressure is not always accurate in detecting changes in the pressure of the tibial and popliteal veins. Although dorsal foot venous pressure may be normal, deep venous pressure may decrease to a lesser degree or even increase.     

Chronic venous insufficiency in a chinese population: An anatomic and functional study by continuous-wave doppler and photoplethysmography

A total of 1583 limbs in 878 patients who presented with symptoms of chronic venous insufficiency of the lower limbs were examined in the vascular laboratory. The anatomic distribution of valvular insufficiency was determined by continuous-wave Doppler ultrasound and functional severity was determined by the venous refilling time (VRT) using photoplethysmography. Severity of reflux was assessed using a four-class grading scale (classes 0 to 3) based on clinical and VRT criteria. A mixed incompetence of the valves in the superficial system and the perforators was encountered in the majority of patients (44% in class 0 and 85% in class 3). Deep vein incompetence was less common and usually consisted of isolated proximal incompetence of the common femoral vein (up to 32% in class 3) or was of a mixed type (21% in class 3). Isolated distal deep vein incompetence was uncommon. Proximal femoral vein incompetence and superficial system incompetence at the saphenofemoral junction were associated with severe reflux. There was significant improvement in the VRT in patients with more severe reflux (class 2 or 3) after application of an ankle tourniquet. Symptoms of moderate to severe chronic venous insufficiency and ankle ulceration may be a result of long-standing superficial system incompetence rather than deep venous disease and may thus be amendable to simple saphenofemoral ligation and interruption of perforators.     

Doppler examination in varicocele. A standard method of evaluation

Doppler sonography is considered a reliable method for detecting reflux due to venous valvular incompetence, which occurs in varicocele. It is, however, a matter of debate whether the characteristics of this reflux can be correlated quantitatively in a clinical setting. In this study, a two-step method was utilized to identify reflux in basal conditions with the patient standing and breathing spontaneously and to determine the time of centrifugal secondary venous reflux of the distal spermatic cord during the squeezing and relaxing maneuver. This method is closely related to that used by the vascular surgeon to detect valvular incontinence of the saphenous vein. Since Doppler sonography is much more reproducible than Valsalva's maneuver, it is therefore much more reliable. In a 12-month period, 625 patients with pathologic findings in at least two spermiograms were studied. Thirty percent showed constant basal reflux not influenced by respiratory exhilation. The squeezing and relaxing maneuver induced secondary reflux longer than 1.6 seconds in 17%, between 0.8 and 1.6 seconds in 17% and less than 0.8 seconds in 36% of the patients. The higher sensitivity and specificity of Doppler examination compared with thermography and angiography, as well as its low cost and noninvasiveness, make this the procedure of choice in the diagnosis of venous reflux in varicocele.     

Evaluation of non-invasive and invasive methods in the assessment of short saphenous vein termination

Surgery of the short saphenous vein is associated with a high recurrence rate because of variations in the anatomy or inadequate clinical examination. To prevent this, accurate definition of the pattern and level of termination of the saphenopopliteal junction and flush ligation is necessary. Clinical examination, Doppler ultrasound, duplex scanning and peroperative venography have been compared to assess the level of termination of the short saphenous vein. In all, 64 limbs of 46 patients were examined. In 39 limbs there was primary short saphenous incompetence, in 13 limbs there was recurrent short saphenous incompetence; in ten of these there was incompetence of the gastrocnemius vein. In 12 limbs a duplex scan did not demonstrate incompetence of the short saphenous vein or gastrocnemius vein. The accuracy of these methods when locating incompetence of the short saphenous vein to within 2 cm of the saphenopopliteal junction was 56 per cent for clinical examination, 64 per cent for Doppler ultrasound and 96 per cent for duplex scanning. When there was no saphenopopliteal junction (9 per cent), duplex scanning correctly detected the pattern of the incompetent vein. The apparent success of clinical examination was because the vein was not felt above the femoral intercondylar groove and 52 per cent of the veins terminated at this level. Duplex scanning is a non-invasive technique which is almost as accurate as venography and provides additional haemodynamic information about the incompetent veins by demonstrating the presence and extent of reflux.     

Recurrent varicose veins following high ligation of long saphenous vein: a duplex ultrasound study

Duplex scanning was used to study recurrent varicose veins in 244 limbs with previous high ligation of the long saphenous vein. The recurrent varicose veins were classified into two types according to the presence or absence of a residual long saphenous vein. Varicose veins with a residual long saphenous vein (type I) occurred in 168 limbs (68.9%). A residual long saphenous vein with an incompetent saphenofemoral junction was present in 125 limbs and one without any residual saphenofemoral junction in 43 limbs. Besides the presence of an incompetent long saphenous vein in this group, an incompetent short saphenous vein was detected in 26 limbs, incompetent perforating vein(s) in 45 limbs and incompetent deep veins in 26 limbs. Varicose veins without a residual long saphenous vein (type II) occurred in 76 limbs (31.1%). An incompetent short saphenous vein was demonstrated in 44 limbs, incompetent perforating vein(s) in 18 limbs and incompetent deep veins in 32 limbs. Of the total 244 limbs with recurrent varicose veins, long saphenous vein incompetence was involved in 168 (68.9%), short saphenous vein incompetence in 70 (28.7%), perforating vein incompetence in 63 (25.8%) and deep venous incompetence in 58 (23.8%). Although saphenofemoral junction incompetence was found to be the main source of recurrence, a segment of incompetent residual long saphenous vein, an incompetent short saphenous vein, perforating vein and deep venous system incompetence are other common sources of recurrence. A precise assessment to identify underlying venous incompetence is important for the management of recurrent varicose veins.     

Relationship of venous reflux to the site of venous valvular incompetence: implications for venous reconstructive surgery

To evaluate the relationship of the site of venous valvular incompetence to the severity of venous reflux, legs of 71 patients with suspected chronic venous insufficiency were evaluated with Doppler ultrasonography and photoplethysmography. A venous recovery time (VRT) of less than 20 seconds after calf muscle exercise was considered indicative of significant reflux. Average VRTs were brief in 15 legs with stasis changes (10 +/- 7 seconds), longer in 42 legs with edema (26 +/- 23 seconds), and normal in 64 asymptomatic legs (37 +/- 24 seconds) and 16 legs with pain (53 +/- 19 seconds). Average VRTs in limbs with incompetent saphenous veins were abnormal. In limbs with competent superficial veins, only those with incompetent distal deep veins (popliteal and posterior tibial) had abnormal VRTs (14 +/- 10 seconds). VRTs in limbs with no detectable valvular incompetence and in those with incompetence limited to the proximal deep veins (common and superficial femoral) were normal (47 +/- 23 and 42 +/- 27 seconds, respectively). When superficial veins were incompetent, an ankle tourniquet normalized VRTs in 63% of legs with proximal deep venous incompetence and in only 33% of legs with distal deep venous incompetence. It is concluded that venous reflux is largely determined by saphenous and distal deep valvular function and that competence of the proximal valves has little effect. Decreased venous reflux would not be expected after proximal valvular reconstruction.     

DUPLEX ULTRASOUND MAPPING OF SITES OF DEEP TO SUPERFICIAL INCOMPETENCE IN PRIMARY VARICOSE VEINS

Most patients undergoing treatment for primary varicose veins have only a clinical assessment or examination with a continuous wave Doppler. In this study duplex ultrasound was used to determine the site of deep to superficial reflux in 137 limbs of 96 patients presenting with primary varicose veins. The incidence of saphenopopliteal (22%) and perforator (28%) incompetence was higher than that in previous studies based on clinical examination. Only five limbs had deep venous incompetence at the popliteal level and three of these limbs had lipodermatosclerosis or ulceration. The saphenopopliteal junction was either absent or more than lOcm from the knee joint in 13% of limbs. The information obtained from duplex scanning of patients with primary varicose veins facilitates surgical management and may lead to a lower recurrence rate.     

Prevalence, anatomic patterns, valvular competence, and clinical significance of the Giacomini vein

OBJECTIVE: Coursing the posterior thigh as a tributary or trunk projection of the small saphenous vein (SSV), the Giacomini vein's clinical significance in chronic venous disease (CVD) remains undetermined. This cross-sectional controlled study examined the prevalence, anatomy, competency status, and clinical significance of the Giacomini vein across the clinical spectrum of CVD in relation to the SSV termination. METHODS: One hundred eighty-nine consecutive subjects (301 limbs) with suspected CVD (109 men, 80 women; age, 18-87 years [median, 61 years]) underwent examination, clinical class (CEAP) stratification, and duplex ultrasound determination of the sites and extent of reflux >0.5 sec) and Giacomini vein's anatomy. RESULTS: A Giacomini vein was found in 70.4% of limbs (212 of 301; 95% confidence interval, 65%-75.6%). Extent, pattern, and sites of reflux in all named superficial and deep veins were evenly distributed in limbs with and without a Giacomini vein; perforator vein incompetence in thigh and calf was also balanced (all, P > .2). Giacomini vein had no effect ( P > .2) on SSV termination anatomy, displaying a similar prevalence in classes C(0-6) . In 212 limbs, either as a tributary or trunk projection of the SSV, the Giacomini vein ascended subfascially (n = 210) to the lower (8%; n = 17), middle (47.6%; n = 101), or upper (44.3%; n = 94) thigh, and terminated at the deep system (45.3%; n = 96) and/or perforated the fascia (64.2%; n = 136), to join the superficial system. Giacomini vein morphology was not affected by the SSV termination anatomy and CEAP clinical class. Incompetence was detected less often (P < .001) in the Giacomini vein (4.7%; n = 10 of 212) than in the saphenous trunks cumulatively (53.3%; n = 113 of 212). Yet the odds ratio of Giacomini incompetence was 11.94 (7 of 33 over 3 of 169) in the presence of SSV reflux, and 11.67 (6 of 23 over 4 of 179) when both the great saphenous vein (proximal, proximal plus distal) and SSV were incompetent. CONCLUSION: Found in more than two thirds of limbs, the Giacomini vein has a complex anatomy that is linked vastly to the deep or superficial veins of the posteromedial thigh, but is unaffected by the anatomy of SSV termination and CEAP clinical class. Its presence proved insignificant to the extent, pattern, sites, and clinical severity of venous incompetence, yet the Giacomini vein was far less often susceptible to reflux than the saphenous trunks were. Routine Giacomini vein investigation is not justified in view of these findings. Investigation could be considered selectively in limbs with SSV incompetence, with or without great saphenous vein incompetence, supported by the high odds of concomitant Giacomini vein reflux.     

Ultrasonography of postoperatively recurrent varicose veins in the area of the short saphenous vein]

STUDY AIM: The aim of this retrospective study was to classify postoperative recurrent varicose veins in the area of the short saphenous vein. PATIENTS AND METHOD: This retrospective ultrasound Doppler exploration was performed in 60 patients (77 limbs) who had been operated with crossectomy, isolated or associated with a stripping of the short saphenous vein, after a mean 9.2-year interval. RESULTS: Recurrences were classified in five categories: 14.8% of the patients had a recurrence in relation to a venous stump at the level of the crossectomy; 32.1% had a saphenous vein in its anatomical location, 21% had reflux due to incompetence; in 28.4%, recurrence was not correlated with the short saphenous vein; and in only 3.8%, there was a pseudo-angiomatosis appearance. In half of these patients, recurrence was related to an incomplete stripping of the short saphenous vein. CONCLUSION: In order to avoid incomplete and inefficient treatments leading to recurrent varicose veins, an ultrasound Doppler exploration is necessary before and after crossectomy and stripping of the short saphenous vein.     

How often is deep venous reflux eliminated after saphenous vein ablation?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Deep venous reflux resolution after great saphenous vein surgery has been reported, but the studies evaluated mainly patients with deep segmental reflux. We prospectively analyzed the effects of greater saphenous vein ablation on coexisting primary deep axial venous reflux compared with segmental venous reflux.Patients and methods Between February 1997 and June 2001, patients with primary deep venous reflux scheduled for greater saphenous vein surgery were included in the study. Limbs of patients with a history of deep venous thrombosis, thrombophlebitis, trauma, and orthopedic or venous surgery were excluded. After surgery, duplex scanning was repeated and patients were examined for persistent deep venous reflux. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients (38 limbs) were followed up with duplex scanning. Follow-up ranged from 2 weeks to 38 months. Preoperative axial deep reflux was present in 17 extremities, and segmental reflux was present in 21. The total number of incompetent segments was 59. Overall reflux abolishment rate was similar in extremities with axial and segmental reflux (30% vs 36%; P >.05). When segments were analyzed individually, abolishment of superficial femoral vein reflux was observed more often in extremities with segmental reflux than those with axial reflux (odds ratio, 4). In the extremities where deep reflux was not abolished with greater saphenous vein ablation, degree of reflux did not change significantly (P >.1). Duplex scanning was performed more than once during follow-up in 9 patients. In 3 of these patients reflux resolved by the second follow-up evaluation, and in 2 reflux was decreased at the second and third follow-up evaluations. CONCLUSION: In patients with concomitant deep and superficial venous reflux, saphenous vein ablation results in resolution of deep reflux in about a third of patients. Superficial femoral vein reflux is seldom corrected in limbs with axial reflux compared with those limbs with segmental reflux. To appreciate the effects of greater saphenous vein ablation, longer follow-up may be needed.     

Femoral venous reflux abolished by greater saphenous vein stripping

Preoperative venous duplex scanning has revealed unexpected deep venous incompetence in patients with apparently only varicose veins. Acting on the hypothesis that the deep vein reflux was secondary to deep vein dilation caused by reflux volume, the following was done. Between July 1990 and April 1993, 29 limbs in 21 patients (16 females) were examined by color-flow duplex imaging to determine valve closure by the method of van Bemmelen. Instrumentation included high-resolution ATL-9 venous interrogation using a pneumatic cuff deflation stimulus of reflux in the standing, nonweight-bearing limb. All limbs showed greater saphenous vein reflux. Twenty-nine showed superficial femoral vein reflux and of these three showed popliteal vein reflux. Duplex testing was performed by a certified vascular technologist whose interpretation was blinded as to the results of clinical examination and grading of the severity of venous insufficiency. Surgery was performed on an outpatient basis under general anesthesia using groin-to-knee removal of the greater saphenous vein by the vein inversion technique of Van Der Strict. Stab avulsion of varicose tributary veins was accomplished during the same period of anesthesia. In 27 of 29 limbs with preoperative femoral reflux, that reflux was abolished by greater saphenous stripping. In patients with popliteal reflux both femoral and popliteal reflux was abolished. Improvement of deep venous hemodynamics by ablation of superficial reflux supports the reflux circuit theory of venous overload. Furthermore, preoperative evaluation of venous hemodynamics by duplex scanning appears to provide useful pre- and postoperative information regarding venous insufficiency in individual patients.Presented at the Twelfth Annual Meeting of the Southern California Vascular Surgical Society, Coronado, Calif, September 17–19, 1993.     

Doppler ultrasound detection of saphenofemoral and saphenopopliteal incompetence and operative venography to ensure precise saphenopopliteal ligation

Recurrent varicose veins may result from inadequate assessment or inadequate surgery. In this study, 110 consecutive patients (165 limbs) were assessed pre-operatively for the presence or absence of reflux at the saphenofemoral (SF) and saphenopopliteal (SP) junctions by clinical assessment and by Doppler ultrasound. The pre-operative results where then compared with findings at the time of surgery. Doppler ultrasound as a means of predicting SF and SP incompetence was superior to clinical assessment. Doppler Doppler ultrasound detected 100% (two false positives) of incompetent SF junctions, and 100% (six false positives) of incompetent SP junctions, compared to the clinical detection of 72% (no false positives) and 64% (five false positives), respectively. Short saphenous venography was performed in 36 limbs in which SP reflux was suspected on clinical assessment and/or by Doppler ultrasound. It proved valuable in demonstrating the level and mode of termination of the short saphenous vein. This guided the placement of the skin incision.