聚丙烯网片修补巨大造口旁疝1例报告

造口旁疝是与肠造口有关的腹壁切口疝,发生率约5％～10％。但巨大切口旁疝罕见。我科对1例直肠癌Miles术后巨大切口旁疝的患者采用造口易位、疝原位聚丙烯网(Prolene)修补获得成功。现报道如下。 临床资料 患者女,61岁。17年前因直肠癌行Miles根治术。术后2年结肠造口旁有可回纳的肿块突出,以后肿块逐渐增大,呈半球状下垂于左侧腹股沟。 检查发现,患者造口旁疝呈半球状突出,约为40cm×25cm×30cm,经肠道准备在全麻下手术,先将结肠造口封闭。见结肠造口旁腹壁缺损,形成10mm×8cm疝口,左半结肠及大网膜经疝口进入皮下疝囊内,与疝囊壁明显粘连,     

聚丙烯网片修补巨大造口旁疝8例体会

造口旁疝是结肠造口术后最常见的并发症，发生率5%-50%。虽然造口旁疝有很多手术方法，但术后复发率较高，尤其巨大造口旁疝，仍然是疝外科的一个难点。目前，人工材料（聚丙烯或聚四氟乙烯网片）已被广泛应用于疝的修补，但造口旁疝的网片修补相对较少。现将我们1999年1月至2006年2月应用聚丙烯网片修补8例巨大造口旁疝的体会介绍如下。     

腹壁造口旁疝网片修补术1例报告

患者,女,70岁.1988年因直肠炎性狭窄行乙状结肠左下腹壁造口术,1995年因造口旁疝行原位修补术.术后3年因造口旁再次出现包块并逐渐增大,排便困难收入院.查体: 左下腹壁见人工肛门,其周围疝块为25 cm×20 cm×10 cm大,以外侧及下方为主,皮下见肠型及蠕动波,平卧时疝内容物不能全部回纳.手术方法: 手术切口选距人工肛门外侧8 cm,从外上向内下斜行切口,切开皮肤、皮下即入疝囊内,内容物为小肠,约1.2 m长,多处与皮下粘连,锐性剥离松解粘连,还纳小肠.     

腹腔镜造口旁疝修补术13例报告

目的探讨采用腹腔镜钥匙孔手术行造口旁疝修补术的可行性。方法回顾性分析2007年11月～2011年10月采用钥匙孔技术及Proceed补片完成的13例腹腔镜造口旁疝修补术的临床资料。2例回肠代膀胱造瘘,11例左下腹永久性乙状结肠造瘘,其中1例为造口旁疝修补术后复发。术中游离疝周粘连后,将补片适当修剪,中间留圆孔,置于疝囊下方,用5mm螺旋钉枪固定于腹壁。结果所有患者均顺利完成手术。术中并发症2例：横结肠系膜血管损伤1例,造瘘肠管损伤1例;术后并发症3例：切口感染1例,血清肿2例。术后随访5-52个月,平均26个月,1例复发,1例死于肺部感染。结论采用腹腔镜钥匙孔手术及Proceed补片行腹腔镜造口旁疝修补术是安全可行的,临床疗效较为满意,在降低造口旁疝修补术后补片相关并发症发生率和复发率方面具有一定的意义。     

腹腔镜造口旁疝修补术

造口旁疝是指病人接受造口手术后，由于各种因素导致腹腔内组织和器官突出于结肠、空肠或尿道等造口周围的人造通道中所形成的肿物。是各种造口手术常见的术后并发症之一，发生率约为造口手术的10％-25％．在Miles和Hartmann手术中发病率更是高达30％～50%。术后一旦发生造口旁疝往往会由于缺乏有效的治疗措施以及病人自身的疏忽，使得疝囊及其内容物不断增大。从而直接影响到造口装置的密封性；同时绝大部分病人都会出现皮肤刺激、局部胀痛及消化不良等不适症状，降低了病人术后的生活质量。     

造口旁疝的临床诊断与治疗体会

随着造口旁疝研究的深入、术式的改进和材料学的发展,造口旁疝术后复发率明显降低.本文通过回顾近期国内外的文献来探讨造口旁疝的预防和早期治疗的重要性.     

补片修补造口旁疝38例疗效

目的总结造口旁疝应用Keyhole补片及超普平片进行疝修补术的疗效。 方法回顾性分析2005年1月至2018年4月,上海交通大学附属第六人民医院采用Keyhole补片及超普平片对38例造口旁疝患者行疝修补术治疗的临床资料。 结果38例造口旁疝患者均采用置入补片的疝修补术实施修补。其中15例行开放手术,6例行纯腔镜下腹膜内补片植入手术,5例行开放结合腔镜的杂交手术,12例行Lap-re-Do手术。手术时间40～300 min,平均（150±72）min。全部随访时间2～46个月,其中造口旁疝复发2例（缝合疝环、补片加固）,浆液肿4例,切口感染3例,造口肠管血运轻度障碍1例,均处理痊愈。 结论造口旁疝应积极应用补片行疝修补手术,疗效可靠。术式需根据术前仔细评估和术中情况做相应选择。     

开放式造口旁疝修补术的手术要点

造口旁疝是造口术后常见的晚期并发症,其发病情况与术后时间呈正相关,随着随访时间的延长,其发病率从5%增加至50%,甚至有报道其发病率为100%.大部分病人对造口旁疝耐受性较好,可通过非手术治疗达到缓解症状的目的.25%～30%的病人最终需手术治疗[7].     

腹腔内放置复合补片原位修补巨大造口旁疝八例

目的总结应用复合补片腹腔内修补巨大造口旁疝的经验。方法回顾性分析复合补片经腹腔内修补巨大造口旁疝8例的临床资料,其中男性6例,女性2例,年龄46～63岁,平均54.7岁。患者均因直肠癌行Miles手术后发生造口旁疝,疝病史3～8年,其中复发性造口旁疝2例。疝环最大径11～15 cm,平均12.6 cm。根据疝环大小选择合适补片,补片边缘均超出疝环缘3 cm以上。在补片中心剪-3 cm直径的孔,并在孔的一侧剪开补片,将补片中心孔套入造口肠管,补片其他部分覆盖住腹壁缺损,补片聚四氟乙烯面朝向腹腔,聚丙烯面朝向腹壁。用2-0的Prolene线连续缝合补片被剪开的一侧裂口,并将补片中心孔的聚四氟乙烯材料缘与造口肠管用3-0的可吸收线间断缝合固定4～5针。然后用1-0的Prolene线经全腹壁穿刺缝合方式,将补片铺平并固定于腹壁,间隔距离5 mm。多余皮肤行适当整形。结果手术时间97～146min,平均109 min。伤口均一期愈合,1例发生浆液肿,2例发生术后近期修补区刺痛。随访3～27个月,平均20个月,无复发。结论复合补片经腹腔内修补巨大造口旁疝是一种安全有效的方法。     

Ultrapro轻量型网片在腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术中的应用

目的探讨Ultrapro轻量型网片在腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术中的优点和应用价值。方法回顾性总结分析我院2008年8月至2010年10月期间,腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术中应用Ultrapro轻量型网片的28例患者的临床资料。结果 28例患者共行疝修补术36例次,其中实施经腹腹膜前腹腔镜疝修补术(TAPP)9例次,腹腔镜全腹膜外疝修补术(TEP)27例次;1例TEP中转行TAPP。平均手术时间为(103.4±39.8)min,术中平均出血量为(7.7±4.9)ml,术后平均住院时间(4.8±1.4)d。术后修补区暂时性神经异常1例,阴囊积液2例,尿潴留1例。28例均随访(15±1.6)个月(1～25个月),期间未观察到网片感染、疝复发、慢性疼痛、异物感或睾丸萎缩等并发症。结论 Ultrapro轻量型网片在腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术中应用方便、视野清晰、柔软、硬度适中、放置定位容易,术后患者并发症少、恢复快,具有较好的临床应用价值。     

Repair of Parastomal Hernias with Biologic Grafts: A Systematic Review

Background  

Biologic grafts are increasingly used instead of synthetic mesh for parastomal hernia repair due to concerns of synthetic mesh-related complications. This systematic review was designed to evaluate the use of these collagen-based scaffolds for the repair of parastomal hernias.     

Results of Performing Mesh Plug Repair for Groin Hernias

The simplicity and good postoperative results of mesh plug repair for groin hernias have been reported in numerous articles. We have been performing this procedure in our department for more than 5 years, and the present study was conducted to reexamine its clinical outcome from our viewpoint. A total of 224 patients with a collective 244 groin hernias underwent mesh plug repair between March 1993 and August 1998. There were 155 (63.5%) indirect hernias, 79 (32.4%) direct hernias, 2 (0.8%) femoral hernias, and 8 (3.3%) compound hernias; 27 (11.1%) were recurrent hernias. Two plugs were inserted in all the compound hernias and in two of the direct hernias with a diffuse weak inguinal floor. The mean operating time was 32.2 min. The complications that developed during this study were continuous pain in four patients, seroma in two, and hematoma in one. The rates of recurrence were 0% for indirect hernias and 12.7% for direct hernias. The patients in whom recurrence developed underwent mesh plug repair again and have had no further recurrence. Our experience showed mesh plug repair to be an excellent technique for indirect hernias or recurrent hernias after mesh repair, but it might be unsuitable for direct hernias with a diffuse bulging weakness in the floor of the inguinal canal. Received: November 25, 1999 / Accepted: September 26, 2000     

Single-Center Experience With Parastomal Hernia Repair Using Retromuscular Mesh Placement

Background

Parastomal hernias (PHs) are frequent complications of enterostomies. We aimed to evaluate our outcomes of open PH repair with retromuscular mesh reinforcement.

Methods

From 2006 to 2013, 48 parastomal hernias were repaired in 46 consecutive patients undergoing open retromuscular repair. Surgical technique included stoma relocation, retromuscular dissection, posterior component separation, and retromuscular mesh placement. All stomas were prophylactically reinforced with cruciate incisions through mesh. Main outcome measures included demographics, perioperative details, wound complications (classified according to the CDC guidelines), and recurrences.

Results

There were 24 male and 22 female patients with a mean age of 61.8 and body mass index (BMI) of 31.7 kg/m². Twenty-four patients had recurrent PH with an average of 3.8 prior repairs. Ostomies included 18 colostomies, 20 ileostomies, and 10 ileal conduits. Thirty-two patients had a concurrent repair of a midline incisional hernia. All patients underwent mesh repair with either biologic (n?=?29), lightweight polypropylene (n?=?15), or absorbable synthetic mesh (n?=?2). There were 15 superficial surgical site infections (SSIs) and 6 deep SSIs. There was one case of an ischemic ostomy requiring surgical revision. No mesh grafts required removal and there were no mesh erosions. At a mean follow-up time of 13 months, five patients (11 %) developed a recurrence; three patients required re-repair.

Conclusion

In this largest series of complex open repairs with retromuscular mesh reinforcement and stoma relocation, we demonstrate that this results in an effective repair. This technique should be considered for complex parastomal hernia repair.     

Bulging of the Mesh After Laparoscopic Repair of Ventral and Incisional Hernias

Background and Objectives:

To investigate the prevalence, diagnosis, clinical significance, and treatment strategies for bulging in the area of laparoscopic repair of ventral hernia that is caused by mesh protrusion through the hernia opening, but with intact peripheral fixation of the mesh and actually a still sufficient repair.

Methods:

Medical records of all 765 patients who underwent laparoscopic ventral hernia repair were reviewed, and all patients with a swelling in the repaired area were identified and analyzed.

Results:

Twenty-nine patients were identified. They all underwent a computed tomography assessment. Seventeen patients (2.2% of the total group) had a hernia recurrence; in an additional 12 patients (1.6%), radiologic examinations indicated only bulging of the mesh but no recurrence. Bulging was associated with pain in 4 patients who underwent relaparoscopy and got a new, larger mesh tightly stretched over the entire previous repair. Eight asymptomatic patients decided on “watchful waiting.” All patients remained symptom free during a median follow-up of 22 months.

Conclusion:

Symptomatic bulging, though not a recurrence, requires a new repair and must be considered as an important negative outcome of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. In asymptomatic patients, “watchful waiting” seems justified.     

Open Intraperitoneal Mesh Repair for Umbilical Hernias A Technical Note

Background: Mesh techniques are the preferable methods for repair of small ventral hernias, including umbilical and epigastric hernias, as primary suture repair shows high recurrence rates. Recently, the Ventralex? (Davol Inc., C.R.Bard, Inc., RI, USA) hernia patch was introduced with promising preliminary short-term results. Methods: In this short technical note we describe both the surgical technique for adequate patch placement and the material characteristics of this device with associated pro’s and con’s.

Conclusion: For small ventral hernia repair the Ventralex? patch is a very elegant and quick to use mesh device. Although it is meant to be used intraperitoneally, it is also possible to place the patch in the preperitoneal space. However, probably due to the less controllable mesh deployment, and the interaction between the different materials, especially in the preperitoneal space, extra attention and some caution during placement is warranted using this device.