Combination of interferon and ribavirin in chronic hepatitis C: re-treatment of nonresponders to interferon

Chronic infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV) may result in cirrhosis, liver failure, and hepatocellular carcinoma. A minority of patients have a sustained response to antiviral therapy, and nonresponders remain at risk of developing progressive liver disease. We conducted a randomized, controlled trial of therapy with the combination of interferon (IFN) and ribavirin in patients with chronic hepatitis C who had not responded to an initial course of therapy with IFN alone. A total of 124 patients were randomized to receive the combination of IFN and ribavirin for either 24 or 48 weeks and followed for an additional 24 weeks after stopping therapy. Thirty-eight treated patients (30.6%) achieved a sustained virologic response (undetectable HCV RNA at the 24-week follow-up point). This was associated with significant improvement in necroinflammatory activity noted on liver biopsy. Interestingly, there was not a statistically significant difference in response rates based on the duration of treatment; HCV genotype was the strongest predictor of a sustained response. Sustained responses were noted even in patients with poor predictive factors, including those with advanced hepatic fibrosis or cirrhosis, high levels of HCV RNA in serum, and those infected with HCV genotype 1. The study included 24 patients with normal serum alanine transaminase (ALT) values before therapy who had similar responses to those with initially elevated transaminase values. This study suggests that the combination of IFN and ribavirin is a useful modality of therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C who did not respond to IFN alone.     

Chronic hepatitis C virus patients with breakthroughs during interferon treatment can successfully be retreated with consensus interferon. The Consensus Interferon Study Group.

Patients with chronic hepatitis C who have not had a sustained hepatitis C virus (HCV)-RNA response or serum alanine transaminase (ALT) response to a 6-month course of interferon (IFN) may respond to higher dose retreatment with consensus interferon (CIFN). Some nonresponders to initial IFN treatment have a transient response defined as undetectable HCV RNA or normalization of ALT during treatment, but subsequently have a "breakthrough" while still on treatment. The aim of this study was to determine if nonresponders who had breakthroughs responded differently to CIFN retreatment than nonresponders without breakthroughs using data from a large, multicenter trial. ALT and HCV RNA were monitored frequently during initial IFN therapy (either 9 mcg CIFN or 3 MU IFN-alpha2b 3 times per week). HCV-RNA breakthroughs were observed in 86 of 467 (18%) of all treated patients, and ALT breakthroughs were observed in 90 of 467 (19%) of all treated patients. There was no association between breakthroughs and the presence of either binding or neutralizing anti-IFN antibodies. When the patients who were nonresponders to initial IFN treatment were retreated with CIFN (15 mcg) for 12 months, 27% of those with viral breakthroughs had a sustained viral response compared with 8% in prior nonresponders without breakthroughs (P =.102). Sustained ALT responses were observed in 39% with breakthroughs compared with 10% in those without breakthroughs (P =.014). The data suggest that prior nonresponders with breakthroughs have a greater chance of responding to retreatment than do nonresponders without breakthroughs. However, most breakthrough patients would be missed unless repeated HCV-RNA testing were conducted during therapy.     

重组复合干扰素治疗慢性丙型肝炎的临床研究

目的 比较两种剂量的重组复合干扰素（Ｃｏｎｓｅｎｓｕｓ Ｉｎｔｅｒｆｅｒｏｎ,ＣＩＦＮ）和重组干扰素α－２α（ＩＦＮα－２α）治疗慢性丙型肝炎患者的疗效和安全性。方法 １８７例初治的慢性丙型肝炎（丙肝）患者,随机分成三组,分别接受：ＣＩＦＮ１５μｇ（Ａ组）６１例、９μｇ（Ｂ组）６５例和ＩＦＮα－２α３ＭＵ（Ｃ组）６１例,１周３次,共２４周,在完成治疗后继续随访２４周。本试验以治疗结束时和随访时丙氨     

High dose consensus interferon in nonresponders to interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin with chronic hepatitis C

OBJECTIVES: Approximately 60% of patients with chronic hepatitis C treated with a combination of interferon (IFN) alpha-2b and ribavirin are nonresponders. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of treatment with high dose consensus IFN (CIFN) (15 microg/day) in nonresponders. METHODS: Patients were administered 15 microg CIFN/day. Treatment was stopped in those whose serum hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA remained detectable at 12 weeks. Those with undetectable HCV RNA at 12 weeks continued on 15 microg three times per week for a further 36 weeks. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients were recruited; six (25%) withdrew before 12 weeks because of side effects. Of the 18 patients who completed 12 weeks of therapy, nine (38%) had undetectable HCV RNA. Seven of nine patients who were HCV RNA-negative at week 12 completed 48 weeks of treatment and two withdrew because of intolerable side effects. At 48 weeks, HCV RNA remained undetectable in three patients. After six months of follow-up off treatment, two patients (8%) continued with no detectable HCV RNA in their sera. CONCLUSIONS: High dose induction therapy with CIFN 15 microg/day in prior nonresponders to IFN alpha-2b and ribavirin led to loss of detectable HCV RNA in 50% of patients, but this response was only sustained in 8% of patients on completion of therapy.     

Predicting response to initial therapy with interferon plus ribavirin in chronic hepatitis C using serum HCV RNA results during therapy

In patients with chronic hepatitis C, 48 weeks of therapy with interferon (IFN) plus ribavirin results in a sustained virologic response of 40%. Preliminary analysis suggests that measuring HCV RNA at week 24, rather than week 12, might provide the best prediction of treatment response. To assess the clinical utility of serum HCV RNA determinations at different times during therapy as a predictor of a sustained virologic response we evaluated 912 treatment‐naïve patients. Patients were randomized to receive IFN‐α2b, 3 million units (MU) three times weekly (tiw), for 24 or 48 weeks with either ribavirin or placebo, and then followed for 24 weeks. Serum HCV RNA was measured at weeks 4 and 12 in patients treated for 24 weeks; at 4, 12, and 24 weeks during therapy in those treated for 48 weeks, and week 24 post‐therapy in all patients. Sustained response was defined as loss of serum HCV RNA at week 24 follow‐up. Other patients were considered virologic nonresponders. For patients receiving 48 weeks of combination therapy, detectable serum HCV RNA at week 24 predicted nonresponse (positive predictive value) in 99% of patients compared to 89% at week 12. In patients treated for 24 weeks, testing at week 12 was more predictive of nonresponse than testing at week 4 in the combination‐therapy group but not in the monotherapy group. Hence, for combination therapy, testing for serum HCV RNA as a predictor of nonresponse is most accurate at week 24 of therapy; a positive test correctly identified 99% of nonresponders.     

High-dose interferon alfa-2b and ribavirin in patients previously treated with interferon: results of a prospective, randomized, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Kinetic studies have demonstrated a more rapid reduction in hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA levels among patients taking high daily doses of interferon compared with those taking standard-dose interferon. GOALS: To compare the efficacy and safety of high-dose interferon alfa-2b and ribavirin with standard-dose interferon alfa-2b and ribavirin in chronic hepatitis C patients previously treated with interferon. STUDY: One hundred seven patients (30 interferon relapsers and 77 interferon nonresponders) were randomized to take either high-dose interferon alfa-2b in combination with ribavirin (group A) (consisting of 5 MU/d for 4 weeks, 5 MU three times weekly for 8 weeks, and then 3 MU three times weekly for 36 weeks) or standard-dose interferon alfa-2b and ribavirin (group B) for 48 weeks. Serum alanine transaminase (ALT), HCV RNA levels, and safety data were prospectively collected and compared during treatment and at week 24 of follow-up. RESULTS: The mean serum ALT and HCV RNA levels, as well as the proportion of patients with genotype 1 and cirrhosis and who were African American, were similar in the two treatment groups at study entry. The rates of suppression of HCV RNA to undetectable levels at weeks 4, 12, and 48 were similar. In addition, the sustained virologic response rates at week 24 of follow-up were similar in groups A and B (29% vs. 39%, respectively, p = 0.277). Clinical variables that correlated with a sustained virologic response included a history of relapse to previous interferon therapy and non-1 HCV genotype ( p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Short-term, high-dose interferon alfa-2b and ribavirin failed to demonstrate a tangible benefit compared with standard-dose interferon alfa-2b and ribavirin. However, our study results and others suggest that standard-dose interferon and ribavirin for 48 weeks should be considered for selected patients who did not respond to previous interferon therapy.     

Evaluation of long-term efficacy of interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin in combination in naive patients with chronic hepatitis C: an Italian multicenter experience. Ribavirin-Interferon in Chronic Hepatitis Italian Group Investigators

BACKGROUND/AIMS: A combination of interferon alpha and ribavirin has been suggested to reach a higher rate of sustained virological response in patients with chronic hepatitis C than monotherapy. In this study we assessed the long-term efficacy of this combination therapy in the treatment of selected Italian naive chronic hepatitis C patients compared to interferon alpha monotherapy. METHODS: We enrolled 428 naive patients who were randomly assigned to receive either recombinant interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin for 24 weeks or interferon alpha-2b alone for 48 weeks. The primary end-point of the study was the rate of sustained virological response. Serum HCV RNA levels were determined before treatment; during treatment at weeks 12 and 24 in the patients receiving the combination therapy; at weeks 12, 24, 36 and 48 in the patients receiving monotherapy; and after therapy at weeks 12, 24 and 48 in the patients in both study groups. RESULTS: Sustained virological response was observed in 43% of the patients treated with combination therapy and in 14% of the patients treated with monotherapy. Logistic regression analysis showed that sustained response was associated with the combination therapy, with HCV genotype other than 1b, with an HCV viral load of 3x10(6) copies/ml or less, with an inflammation score of 7 or less, and with an estimated duration of disease of 10 years or less. CONCLUSIONS: A 24-week treatment course with interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin offers a greater chance of sustained virological response compared to treatment with interferon alpha-2b alone for 48 weeks, and may be indicated as initial therapy in such patients.     

Prognostic value of the soluble interleukin-2 receptor in chronic hepatitis C treated with interferon-alfa. Multicenter GER-CYT 04 Group.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: High serum levels of the soluble interleukin 2 receptor (sIL-2R) have been reported in patients with chronic hepatitis C. The aims of this study were to determine the evolution of sIL-2R considered as an indicator of activation of T cells in patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) treated with IFN-alpha and to correlate sIL-2R serum levels with parameters reflecting ongoing liver disease and with outcome of interferon treatment. METHODS: In a case-control study, we studied patients enrolled in a multicenter randomized clinical trial which had demonstrated the benefit of a reinforced regimen of interferon alpha. Each of the 26 sustained virological responders (SVR) was paired for treatment regimen with two non-responders (NR). RESULTS: Prior to treatment, higher levels of sIL-2R were found in the sera of 78 patients compared with healthy controls (3791+/-210 pg/ml versus 956+/-88 pg/ml (p<0.001)). In the 78 patients after 4 weeks of treatment, the levels of sIL-2R were higher than pretreatment levels (4308+/-206 pg/ml (p<0.01)). In the NR, levels of sIL-2R increased significantly after 4 weeks of treatment compared with pretreatment levels (p<0.01), and levels of sIL-2R at week 72 were not significantly different from those at pretreatment. Conversely, in the SVR, levels of sIL-2R at week 4 did not significantly increase compared to pretreatment values, and thereafter gradually decreased. At week 72, levels of sIL-2R were significantly lower than before treatment (p<0.001). The difference between levels of sIL-2R at week 4 and before initiation of treatment (delta s IL-2R) was smaller in the SVR than in the NR (142+/-219 pg/ml versus 704+/-107 pg/ml (p<0.02). The disappearance of HCV RNA from the serum at week 4 showed a sensitivity of 92% (95% confidence interval 86-98) and a specificity of 60% (95% confidence interval 49-71), delta sIL-2R had a sensitivity of 42% (95% confidence interval 31-53) and a specificity of 81% (95% confidence interval 79-90) for the prediction of a sustained virological response 6 months after stopping treatment. The disappearance of HCV RNA from serum at week 4 and delta sIL-2R were independent and early predictive factors for a sustained virological response 6 months after stopping treatment. CONCLUSIONS: At week 4, delta sIL-2R may be a more specific parameter than the disappearance of HCV RNA for assessing total, and hence more sustained, elimination of HCV infection 6 months after stopping treatment.     

Is delayed normalization of alanine aminotransferase a poor prognostic predictor in chronic hepatitis C patients treated with a combined interferon and ribavirin therapy?

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Decreased alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level is the accepted basic indicator of an interferon (IFN) therapeutic effect in chronic hepatitis C. This study assessed whether delayed normalization of ALT predicts a poor response to a combined therapy of IFN and ribavirin in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. METHODS: Patients were treated with IFN-alpha 2b three times weekly and oral ribavirin for 24 weeks. The ALT values were assessed monthly and patterns of changes in ALT activity were analyzed. Serum HCV-RNA was checked at weeks 0, 12, 24, and 48. RESULTS: A total of 103 patients completed therapy and 69 (67%) of them achieved a sustained viral response (SVR). There was no significant difference in the SVR between patients with or without early normalization (week 12) of ALT level (69 vs 56%). Of the sustained responders, nine patients (13%) with delayed ALT normalization had a SVR. Nine of the 12 patients (75%) with abnormal ALT and negative HCV-RNA at week 12 had a SVR compared with none of four patients who had positive HCV-RNA at week 12 (P = 0.0192). CONCLUSIONS: Lack of normalization of the ALT level at week 12 does not preclude successful virological outcome in hepatitis C patients receiving a combined therapy of IFN and ribavirin. Hepatitis C virus RNA at week 12 may be a useful predictor of treatment outcome in patients without early biochemical response.     

Iron reduction as an adjuvant to interferon therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C who have previously not responded to interferon: a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial

Hepatic iron concentration has consistently been observed as being directly correlated with the response to interferon therapy in chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV). We therefore conducted a randomized, controlled trial comparing iron reduction by phlebotomy with iron reduction followed by retreatment with interferon in 96 patients with chronic hepatitis C who had previously not responded to a course of interferon. During the initial phase when all patients were undergoing phlebotomy, we found that serum alanine transaminase (ALT) activities decreased but by less than 50% from baseline in 67 patients (89%), decreased by more than 50% in 12 patients (13%) and became normal in 9 patients (9%) with no overall change in HCV-RNA levels. Subsequently no patient in either treatment group achieved a sustained virologic response. Improvements in necroinflammatory changes were noted in liver biopsy specimens in those patients receiving phlebotomy plus interferon (mean index 8.59 vs. 7.37, P <. 05). A slight but not statistically significant decrease in histologic activity index was noted in those subjects treated by phlebotomy alone (mean index 8.4 vs. 7.75, P not significant). We conclude that, although prior phlebotomy therapy does not improve the rate of sustained response to interferon retreatment, it does result in less liver injury manifested by a decrease in serum transaminase activity and a slight improvement in liver histopathology.     

Combined interferon α2b and cyclosporin A in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C: controlled trial

Background. Only 15% to 20% of patients with chronic hepatitis C have a sustained virological response to interferon monotherapy. The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy and safety of interferon, in combination with oral cyclosporin A, with interferon monotherapy in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C. Methods. We assigned 120 patients with chronic hepatitis C to receive the standard Japanese dose of interferon α2b alone for 24 weeks or that dose of interferon α2b in combination with cyclosporin A, at doses of 200 mg daily for the first 4 weeks and 100 mg daily for the following 20 weeks. All patients were assessed for drug safety, tolerance, and efficacy at the end of weeks 4, 12, 24, and 48. Efficacy was assessed by the disappearance of serum hepatitis C virus (HCV)-RNA by polymerase chain reaction and normalization of serum aminotransferase. The primary endpoint was a sustained virological response; i.e., sustained undetectable serum HCV RNA at 48 weeks. Results. The sustained virological response rate was significantly higher in the combination therapy group (42/76) than in the monotherapy group (14/44; P = 0.01). The sustained biochemical response rate was also higher in the combination therapy group (46/76) than in the monotherapy group (17/44; P = 0.017). In patients with genotype 1 and high viral loads, the sustained virological response rate was markedly higher in the combination therapy group (16/38) than in the monotherapy group (1/21; P = 0.006). Side-effect profiles were similar in the two groups. Conclusions. In patients with chronic hepatitis C; combined interferon and cyclosporin A treatment was more effective than interferon monotherapy. The benefit was mostly achieved in patients with a high viral load and HCV genotype 1. Received: March 12, 2002 / Accepted: November 22, 2002 RID="*" ID="*" Reprint requests to: K. Inoue     

The efficacy of extended treatment with pegylated interferon plus ribavirin in patients with HCV genotype 1 and slow virologic response in Japan

Background

Which patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 can benefit from extended treatment with pegylated interferon (Peg-IFN) plus ribavirin is unknown, although the overall sustained virologic response (SVR) rate has been shown to improve in patients with a late virologic response (LVR), defined as detectable serum HCV RNA at week 12 and undetectable at week 24.

Methods

Among 1163 chronic hepatitis C patients with genotype 1 treated with Peg-IFN plus ribavirin combination therapy, 213 patients with an LVR were examined in this study. In addition, we selected 81 patients of matched sex and age from each of the 48- and 72-week treatment groups, using the propensity score, to compare the efficacy of the two treatment durations.

Results

With 72-week treatment, the timing of HCV RNA disappearance and the hemoglobin level at baseline showed a strong correlation with the SVR on multivariate analysis. Earlier HCV RNA disappearance was associated with a better SVR rate, regardless of the ribavirin dose (HCV RNA disappearance at week 16, 74%; at week 20, 52%; and at week 24, 31%, p?=?0.01). The SVR rate with 72-week treatment was higher than that with 48-week treatment, irrespective of age, sex, or the platelet value, and, especially in aged patients (??65?years old), the SVR rate increased markedly with 72-week treatment (48?weeks, 25% vs. 72?weeks, 56%; p?Conclusions An earlier response predicts a higher SVR rate in patients with an LVR given 72-week treatment. Extended treatment with Peg-IFN plus ribavirin for patients with an LVR improved the treatment efficacy, even for aged patients.     

Retreatment for 24 vs 48 weeks with interferon-alpha2b plus ribavirin of chronic hepatitis C patients who relapsed or did not respond to interferon alone

We assessed the efficacy of interferon (IFN) plus ribavirin over 24 or 48 weeks for the retreatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C who had relapsed or did not respond to a previous course of IFN. One-hundred and twenty patients (69 non-responders and 51 relapsers) were randomly assigned to receive IFN-alpha2b (3 million units thrice weekly) plus ribavirin (1,000-1,200 mg per day) for 24 weeks (group A: 58 patients) or 48 weeks (group B: 62 patients). Treatment was discontinued at week 12 if the alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level remained elevated. The rate of sustained response was 15.5% in group A and 37.1% in group B (P = 0.013). Relapsers treated for 48 weeks had a sustained response rate of 66.6% compared with a sustained response rate of only 25% in those treated for 24 weeks (P = 0.004). Moreover, a sustained response was seen in 14.3% of non-responders treated for 48 weeks and in 8.8% of those treated for 24 weeks (P = 0.71). Fifty-three per cent of patients with a normal ALT level and undetectable hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA at week 12 had a sustained response compared with 14% of those who were HCV RNA positive at week 12 (P < 0.001). Independent predictive factors of sustained response were: therapy for 48 weeks (P = 0.0026), relapse after IFN treatment (P = 0.0006), loss of HCV RNA at week 12 (P = 0.0008) and HCV genotype non-1 (P = 0.024). Hence, in patients with chronic hepatitis C who failed to respond to a previous course of IFN monotherapy, combination therapy with IFN plus ribavirin for 48 weeks seems to be more effective than IFN plus ribavirin for 24 weeks.     

Recent Ⅳ-drug users with chronic hepatitis C can be efficiently treated with daily high dose induction therapy using consensus interferon： An open-label pilot study

AIM： To investigate the use of high dose consensusinterferon in combination with ribavirin in former iv drug users infected with hepatitis C.
METHODS： We started, before pegylated （PEG）interferons were available, an open-label study to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of high dose induction therapy with consensus interferon （CIFN） and ribavirin in treatment of naiive patients with chronic hepatitis C. Fifty-eight patients who were former iv drug users, were enrolled receiving 18 μg of CIFN daily for 8 wk, followed by 9 μg daily for up to wk 24 or 48 and 800 mg of ribavirin daily. End point of the study was tolerability and eradication of the virus at wk 48 and sustained virological response at wk 72.
RESULTS： More than 62% of patients responded to the treatment with CIFN at wk 24 or 48, respectively, showing a negative qualitative PCR [genotype 1 fourteen patients （56%）, genotype 2 five （50%）, genotype 3 thirteen （87%）, genotype 4 four （50%）]. Forty-eight percent of genotype 1 patients showed sustained virological response （SVR） six months after the treatment. CONCLUSION： CIFN on a daily basis is well tolerated and side effects like leuko- and thrombocytopenia are moderate. End of therapy （EOT） rates are slightly lower than the newer standard therapy with pegylated interferons. CIFN on a daily basis might be a favourable therapy regimen for patients with GTI and high viral load or for non-responders after failure of standard therapy.     

Consensus interferon and ribavirin for patients with chronic hepatitis C and failure of previous interferon-alpha therapy.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of consensus interferon (CIFN), a synthetic IFN with optimised in vitro activity, was assessed in chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) patients who had failed the pretreatment with interferon-alpha (IFNalpha) and ribavirin. METHODS: One hundred and three patients after non-response (n=69) or relapse (n=34) to IFNalpha+/-ribavirin were randomly assigned to high-dose induction (CIFN 27-->9 microg daily for 24 weeks, 9 microg t.i.w. for 24 weeks) or low-dose treatment (CIFN 18 microg t.i.w. for 12 weeks, 9 microg t.i.w. for 36 weeks); each with ribavirin 800 mg/day. Follow-up was 24 weeks. RESULTS: Non-responder patients treated with high-dose induction had higher early virological response rates (63% vs. 39%, P<0.05). This initial positive effect was lost during the last 24 weeks of treatment yielding sustained virological response (SVR) rates of 26% in both groups. Relapse patients revealed SVR in 70% and 38% in groups A and B (NS). Treatment was well tolerated with side effect-related preterm discontinuations in 8% and 5%. CONCLUSIONS: CIFN and ribavirin treatment induced considerable SVR rates in patients with non-response or relapse to IFNalpha+/-ribavirin. Viral elimination rates might be further increased by continuous daily administration of CIFN and weight-adjusted ribavirin dosing.     

Current and future therapies of hepatitis C

With recent advances in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C, patients with elevated aminotransferase levels, detectable HCV RNA in the serum, and chronic inflammation are candidates for therapy. The best initial therapy is interferon plus ribavirin, achieving a sustained response rate in 40% of patients. The duration of therapy should be based on HCV genotype (48 weeks for genotype 1; 24 weeks for other genotypes). Serum HCV RNA should be measured at week 24 to assess response and guide further therapy in patients with genotype 1 infection. Patients unsuitable for combination therapy can be treated with interferon monotherapy. Side effects, dose modification and discontinuation are generally more frequent with interferon plus ribavirin, but can be managed with close follow-up and careful monitoring. With rapid developments in treatment, new therapies will require careful prospective evaluation according to HCV genotype and viral-load characteristics. Recommendations for therapy will probably change every few years, and novel approaches may provide effective therapy for most patients with hepatitis C.     

Recent Ⅳ-drug users with chronic hepatitis C can be efficiently treated with daily high dose induction therapy using consensus interferon: An open-label pilot study

AIM: To investigate the use of high dose consensusinterferon in combination with ribavirin in former iv drug users infected with hepatitis C.METHODS: We started, before pegylated (PEG)interferons were available, an open-label study to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of high dose induction therapy with consensus interferon (CIFN) and ribavirin in treatment of naiive patients with chronic hepatitis C. Fifty-eight patients who were former iv drug users, were enrolled receiving 18 μg of CIFN daily for 8 wk, followed by 9 μg daily for up to wk 24 or 48 and 800 mg of ribavirin daily. End point of the study was tolerability and eradication of the virus at wk 48 and sustained virological response at wk 72.RESULTS: More than 62% of patients responded to the treatment with CIFN at wk 24 or 48, respectively,showing a negative qualitative PCR [genotype 1 fourteen patients (56%), genotype 2 five (50%),genotype 3 thirteen (87%), genotype 4 four (50%)].Forty-eight percent of genotype 1 patients showed sustained virological response (SVR) six months after the treatment.CONCLUSION: CIFN on a daily basis is well tolerated and side effects like leuko- and thrombocytopenia are moderate. End of therapy (EOT) rates are slightly lower than the newer standard therapy with pegylated interferons. CIFN on a daily basis might be a favourable therapy regimen for patients with GT1 and high viral load or for non-responders after failure of standard therapy.