Patterns of saphenous reflux in women with primary varicose veins

OBJECTIVE: Varicose veins have been linked to great saphenous vein (GSV) reflux and in particular, with reflux at the saphenofemoral junction (SFJ). Early stages of disease, however, may be associated with limited, localized reflux in segments of the GSV and/or small saphenous vein (SSV). Ultrasound mapping of saphenous veins was performed to determine patterns of GSV and SSV reflux in women with simple, primary varicose veins. METHODS: Ultrasound mapping was performed prospectively in 590 extremities of 326 women with varicose veins (CEAP C 2 class) but without edema, skin changes, or ulcers (C 3 to C 6 ). Average age was 42 +/- 13 (SD) years (range, 8 to 87). Patterns of GSV and SSV reflux, obtained in the upright position, were classified as I: perijunctional, originating from the SFJ or saphenopopliteal junction (SPJ) tributaries into the GSV or SSV; II: proximal, from the SFJ or SPJ to a tributary or perforating vein above the level of the malleoli; III: distal, from a tributary or perforating vein to the paramalleolar GSV or SSV; IV: segmental, from a tributary or perforating vein to another tributary or perforating vein above the malleoli; V; multisegmental, if two or more distinct refluxing segments were detected; and VI: diffused, involving the entire GSV or SSV from the SFJ or SPJ to the malleoli. RESULTS: Reflux was detected in 472 extremities (80%): 100 (17%) had reflux in both the GSV and SSV, 353 (60%) had GSV reflux only, and 19 (3%) had SSV reflux only, for a total prevalence of 77% at the GSV and 20% at the SSV. The most common pattern of GSV reflux was segmental (types IV and V) in 342 (58%) of 590; either one segment in 213 (36%) or more than one segment with competent SFJ in 99 (17%), or incompetent SFJ in 30 (5%), followed by distal GSV reflux (type III) in 65 (11%), proximal GSV reflux (type II) in 32 (5%), diffused throughout the entire GSV (type VI) in 10 (2%), and perijunctional (type I) in 4 (<1%). GSV refluxing segments were noted in the SFJ in 72 (12%) and in the thigh in 220 (37%), and leg (or both) in 345 (58%). CONCLUSIONS: The high prevalence of reflux justifies ultrasound mapping of the saphenous veins in women with primary varicose veins. Correction of SFJ reflux, however, may be needed in 相似文献   

Segmental hypoplasia of the great saphenous vein and varicose disease.

OBJECTIVES: Primitive narrowing of great saphenous vein segments (saphenous hypoplasia) has been described in healthy limbs. The aim of the present study was to detect great saphenous vein segmental hypoplasia in limbs with varicose veins and to evaluate the local anatomical and haemodynamic patterns. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The incidence of saphenous hypoplasia and the local haemodynamic rearrangement were evaluated by duplex ultrasonography in 676 normal limbs and in 320 limbs with varicose veins. RESULTS: Segmental hypoplasia was demonstrated in 84 normal limbs and in 79 limbs with saphenous reflux. In the latter, the retrograde flow leaves the GSV at the proximal end of the hypoplastic segment to feed tributary veins. CONCLUSIONS: Saphenous hypoplasia occurs in varicose limbs more frequently than in healthy ones (p= >0.001). It greatly influences the path of the reflux and the anatomy of the varicose veins. GSV segmental hypoplasia can be detected preoperatively by duplex ultrasonography. Its occurrence may influence surgical management for two main reasons: in about 68% of varicose limbs with segmental hypoplasia, the distal GSV is competent. If the distal GSV is varicose, its size and flow direction is normalised by treating the accessory vein that bypasses the hypoplastic segment.     

Anatomical Patterns of the Above Knee Great Saphenous Vein and its Tributaries: Implications for Endovenous Treatment Strategy

Objective: The aim of the present study was to analyse the anatomical patterns of the above knee great saphenous vein (GSV) and its tributaries in limbs with varicose veins in view of potential suitability for endovenous treatment. Methods: Limbs of a consecutive series of new patients with varicose veins presenting at the phlebologic clinic during a 4 month period were studied. In 73 limbs of 56 patients with varicose veins and both saphenofemoral junction and GSV reflux, anatomical patterns of the above knee GSV were defined as :

-‘complete’ GSV: main trunk visualised within the saphenous compartment from the groin to the knee

-‘incomplete’ GSV: main trunk partially visualised from the groin to mid thigh with a non-refluxing mostly hypoplastic distal GSV and a superficial tributary vein (STV) parallel to the GSV.

Results: 51 limbs (70 %) had a ‘complete’ GSV. In 4 of these 51 limbs reflux passed from the main GSV trunk to a STV at mid thigh level leaving a non-refluxing part of the GSV from mid thigh to the knee.

Conclusion: In only 64% of limbs with varicose veins the entire above knee GSV was involved in the disease. This may have implications for endovenous treatment strategy.     

Clinical and hemodynamical findings in legs with previous surgery of the great saphenous vein: role of the small saphenous vein

AIM: To assess the role of small saphenous vein (SSV) reflux in patients with a long history of varicose disease and previous stripping of the great saphenous vein (GSV). METHODS: Consecutive patients with a history of GSV stripping 5-19 years earlier were enrolled in this prospective clinical study. A total of 101 legs of 75 consecutive patients fulfilled the study criteria: previous stripping of GSV from ankle to groin at least 5 years earlier, no history of thromboembolism and no previous surgery of deep veins or SSV. All patients were studied clinically using standardized classifications: clinical class, clinical disability score (CDS) and venous clinical scoring system (VCSS). Colour flow duplex imaging (CFDI) was used to assess reflux in deep and superficial veins. Details of prior surgery were evaluated. RESULTS: Overall, SSV reflux was noted in 28 (28%) of the legs, recurrent GSV (rGSV) in the thigh in 41 (41%), reflux in tributaries alone in 28 (28%) and a combination of SSV and rGSV reflux in 4 (3%). Segmental deep reflux was measured in 23 (23%) of the legs; the prevalence of deep reflux was significantly higher in complicated than in uncomplicated legs (12% versus 47%; P<0.05). Deep reflux was more frequently associated with SSV reflux than with rGSV reflux (50% versus 22%; P<0.05). The prevalence of SSV with or without deep reflux increased from 17% to 50% (P<0.05) when uncomplicated (C2-3) and complicated (C4-6) legs were compared. A similar increase was not seen in the legs with rGSV (39% versus 44%; P>0.05). SSV reflux without deep reflux was observed in 25% of the legs with complicated (C4-6) disease, whereas the prevalence of SSV reflux was low (9%) in uncomplicated (C2-3) legs. VCSS was higher in the legs with SSV reflux than in those with rGSV reflux. CDS scores tended to be higher in the SSV reflux group than in the legs with rGSV reflux or tributary reflux alone. After exclusion of deep reflux, the results remained at the same level. CONCLUSION: Small saphenous vein (SSV) reflux is common in legs with recurrent varicose veins and previous stripping of the GSV. SSV reflux alone is frequent in complicated legs, and SSV reflux is typically associated with segmental deep reflux. Clinical and hemodynamical findings stress the role of SSV reflux in this selected venous population.     

Subfascial endoscopic perforator vein surgery combined with saphenous vein ablation: results and critical analysis

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to determine the results of subfascial endoscopic perforator vein surgery (SEPS) combined with ablation of superficial venous reflux. METHODS: Clinical data were retrospectively analyzed for 74 consecutive limbs (65 patients) in which this combination treatment was performed at a university medical center. Preoperatively, 58 lower extremities had an open venous ulcer (CEAP clinical class 6 [C(6)]) and 16 had healed ulceration (C(5)). Preoperative and postoperative ulcer care remained constant. Main outcomes measured included perioperative complications, ulcer healing, and ulcer recurrence. Clinical severity and disability scores were tabulated before and after surgery. Mean patient follow-up was 44 months. RESULTS: Greater saphenous vein (GSV) stripping and varicose vein excision accompanied SEPS in 57 limbs (77%), and SEPS was performed alone or with varicose vein excision in 17 limbs that had previously undergone GSV stripping. Postoperative complications occurred in 12 limbs (16%), all with C(6) disease (P =.04). Ulcer healing occurred in 91% (53 of 58) of limbs with C(6) disease at a mean of 2.9 months (range, 13 days-17 months). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that ulcer healing was negatively affected by previous limb trauma (P =.011). Ulceration recurred in 4 limbs (6%) at 7, 20, 21, and 30 months, respectively. This was associated with a history of limb trauma (P =.027) and preoperative ultrasound evidence of GSV reflux combined with deep venous obstruction (P(R,O); P =.043). Clinical severity and disability scores improved significantly after surgery (both, P <.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Most venous ulcers treated with SEPS with ablation of superficial venous reflux heal rapidly and remain healed during medium-term follow-up. Ulcer healing is adversely affected by a history of severe limb trauma, and ulcer recurrence is similarly affected by a history of limb trauma in addition to superficial venous reflux combined with deep venous obstructive disease. Overall, there was marked improvement of postoperative clinical severity and disability scores compared with those obtained before surgery.     

Deep venous thrombosis and superficial venous reflux

OBJECTIVE: Although superficial venous reflux is an important determinant of post-thrombotic skin changes, the origin of this reflux is unknown. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the frequency and etiologic mechanisms of superficial venous reflux after acute deep venous thrombosis (DVT). METHODS: Patients with a documented acute lower extremity DVT were asked to return for serial venous duplex ultrasound examinations at 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, every 3 months for the first year, and every year thereafter. Reflux in the greater saphenous vein (GSV) and lesser saphenous vein (LSV) was assessed by standing distal pneumatic cuff deflation. RESULTS: Sixty-six patients with a DVT in 69 lower extremities were followed up for a mean of 48 (SD +/- 32) months. Initial thrombosis of the GSV was noted in 15 limbs (21.7%). At 8 years, the cumulative incidence of GSV reflux was 77.1% (SE +/- 0.11) in DVT limbs with GSV involvement, 28.9% (+/- 0.09%) in DVT limbs without GSV thrombosis, and 14.8% (+/- 0.05) in uninvolved contralateral limbs (P <.0001). For LSV reflux, the cumulative incidence in DVT limbs was 23.1% (+/- 0.06%) in comparison with 10% (+/- 0.06%) in uninvolved limbs (P =.06). In comparison with uninvolved contralateral limbs, the relative risk of GSV reflux for DVT limbs with and without GSV thrombosis was 8.7 (P <.001) and 1.4 (P =.5), respectively. The relative risk of LSV reflux in thrombosed extremities compared with uninvolved extremities was 3.2 (P =.07). Despite these observations, the fraction of observed GSV reflux that could be attributable to superficial thrombosis was only 49%. CONCLUSIONS: Superficial venous thrombosis frequently accompanies DVT and is associated with development of superficial reflux in most limbs. However, a substantial proportion of observed reflux is not directly associated with thrombosis and develops at a rate equivalent to that in uninvolved limbs.     

Patterns of Saphenous Venous Reflux in Women Presenting with Lower Extremity Telangiectasias

BACKGROUND: Telangiectasias have been treated with sclerotherapy without concomitant assessment or treatment of saphenous veins. OBJECTIVE: To clarify if ultrasound (US) mapping of saphenous veins is justifiable, this investigation determined prevalence of specific patterns of saphenous vein reflux in women with telangiectasias. METHODS: US mapping of the great and small saphenous veins (GSV, SSV) was performed in 1,740 extremities of 910 consecutive patients, mostly women (86%). A subgroup of 269 limbs of women with telangiectasias (CEAP C1 class) was included in this study. Patterns of GSV and SSV reflux were classified as perijunctional, proximal, distal, segmental, multisegmental, and diffuse. RESULTS: Reflux was detected in 125 extremities (46%): 5% had reflux in both the GSV and the SSV, 39% had GSV reflux, and 2% had SSV reflux. The most common pattern of GSV reflux was segmental (73%, 87/119). Prevalence of reflux was significantly greater in GSV versus SSV (p < .001). GSV segmental plus distal reflux (40%, 108/269) was significantly more prevalent than saphenofemoral junction or near junction reflux (4%, 11/269; p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: US mapping of the GSV in women with telangiectasias is justifiable, even in asymptomatic extremities. Further research will determine if segmental reflux should be treated to avoid evolution to severe valvular insufficiency.     

Neovascularization: an "innocent bystander" in recurrent varicose veins

OBJECTIVE: Varicose vein recurrence after surgery occurs in up to 60% of patients. A variety of technical factors have been implicated, but biological factors such as neovascularization have more recently been proposed. The objective of this study was to characterize the relative contribution of technical and biological factors to recurrence in a large prospective series of recurrent varicose veins. METHODS: Duplex and operative findings were recorded prospectively in a consecutive series of 500 limbs undergoing surgery for recurrent varicose veins between 1995 and 2005 in a university teaching hospital. Only limbs with previous saphenofemoral junction surgery were included. All limbs had preoperative duplex mapping by an accredited vascular technician who assessed the status of the great saphenous vein (GSV) in the thigh and groin, sought sonographic evidence of neovascularization, and reported on the presence of reflux in the short saphenous vein and perforator sites (typical and atypical). All operations were performed with an attending vascular surgeon as the lead operator. RESULTS: Primary GSV surgery was incomplete in 83.2% of limbs. A completely intact GSV system was present in 17.4% of limbs. An incompetent thigh saphenous vein was present in 44.2% of limbs, 37.6% had GSV stump incompetence with one or more intact tributaries, and 16% had both a residual thigh GSV and an incompetent stump with intact tributaries. Non-GSV sites of reflux were identified in 25% of limbs. Neovascularization was identified on duplex scanning in 41 (8.2%) limbs. However, in 27 of these, surgical exploration revealed a residual GSV stump with 1 or more significant tributaries. Each of the remaining 14 (2.8%) limbs had a residual incompetent thigh GSV. CONCLUSIONS: Despite reports to the contrary, neovascularization occurs in a relatively small proportion of patients with recurrent varicose veins. All recurrent varicose veins associated with duplex-diagnosed neovascularization are also associated with persistent reflux in the GSV stump tributaries, thigh GSV, or both. Recurrence after primary varicose vein surgery is associated with inadequate primary surgery or progression of disease, and neovascularization alone is not a cause of recurrent varicose veins.     

Pregnancy-induced changes in lower extremity superficial veins: an ultrasound scan study

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to follow changes in superficial veins of the lower extremities during pregnancy and the postpartum period in women with varicose veins. METHODS: This was a prospective study with the use of duplex scanning during the first and third trimesters of pregnancy and postpartum period. Competent veins were defined as veins with an absence of reflux, and incompetent veins were defined as veins with reflux. The diameter of the competent or incompetent greater saphenous vein (GSV) and lesser saphenous vein (LSV) was measured. The diameter of the largest varicose dilatations was measured in all three networks: GSV and its tributaries, LSV and its tributaries, and nonsaphenous varicose veins. RESULTS: Sixty-six women were studied prospectively (mean age, 32.2 +/- 4 years; 85 affected extremities). The diameter of competent and incompetent GSVs and competent LSVs increased between the first and third trimester (P <.001) and decreased between the third trimester and the postpartum period (P <.001). The diameter of the largest varicose dilatations of the GSV and its tributaries and nonsaphenous networks increased between the first and third trimester (P <.001) and decreased between the third trimester and the postpartum period (P <.001). No statistically significant variation of the diameter was demonstrated for any of these veins between the first trimester and the postpartum period. CONCLUSION: The diameters of competent and incompetent superficial veins increased during pregnancy and decreased during the postpartum period to return to their baseline values.     

Factors influencing the effectiveness of endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) in the treatment of great saphenous vein reflux.

OBJECTIVE: Endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) is an alternative to surgery for treating sapheno-femoral and great saphenous vein (GSV) reflux. This study assesses factors that might influence its effectiveness. DESIGN: Prospective, observational study. METHOD: EVLA was used to treat the great saphenous vein in 644 limbs as part of the management of varicose veins. Body mass index (BMI), maximum GSV diameter, length of vein treated, total laser energy (TLE) and energy density (ED: Joules/cm) delivered were recorded prospectively. Data from limbs with ultrasound confirmed GSV occlusion at 3-months were compared with those where the GSV was partially occluded or patent. Complications were recorded prospectively. RESULTS: GSV occlusion was achieved in 599/644 (93%) limbs (group A). In 45 limbs (group B) the vein was partially occluded (n=19) or patent (n=26). Neither BMI [group A: 25.2 (23.0-28.5); group B: 25.1 (24.3-26.2)], nor GSV diameter [A: 7.2mm (5.6-9.2); B: 6.9 mm (5.5-7.7)] influenced success. TLE and ED were greater p<0.01) in group A (median [inter-quartile range]: 1877J (997-2350), 48 (37-59)J/cm) compared to group B (1191J (1032-1406), 37 (30-46)J/cm). Although TLE reflects the greater length of GSV ablated in Group A (33 cm v 29 cm, p=0.06) this does not influence ED. GSV occlusion always occurred when ED>/=60 J/cm with no increase in complications. CONCLUSIONS: ED (J/cm) of laser delivery is the main determinant of successful GSV ablation following EVLA.     

Endovenous ablation of the great saphenous vein may avert phlebectomy for branch varicose veins

BACKGROUND: Endovenous ablation of the great saphenous vein (GSV) may be performed simultaneously with stab phlebectomy of branch varicose veins or as a stand-alone procedure. A clinical approach of performing radiofrequency ablation (RFA) alone as initial treatment for varicose veins was reviewed. METHODS: Patients with duplex ultrasound-documented reflux in the GSV and CEAP clinical stage 2 to 6 were selected for RFA. Patients were examined within a week preoperatively with duplex ultrasound imaging. Patients were seen within a week postoperatively and again at 2 to 3 months to ascertain if further treatment was required. A retrospective review of the initial 184 procedures in a series from June 2002 through February 2005 was performed, allowing for a 9-month follow-up period. RESULTS: Three procedures were performed under general anesthesia and 181 with intravenous sedation and tumescent anesthesia. Postoperative duplex scans showed total occlusion or partial patency of <10 cm in 155 limbs. Seven (4.5%) had concomitant stab phlebectomy, seven subsequently had sclerotherapy, and 39 (25.2%) underwent subsequent stab phlebectomy of persistent symptomatic varicosities. In 101 limbs (65.1%), symptoms resolved and had no further therapy, and 24 limbs had a GSV that was patent for >10 cm on postoperative duplex imaging. Nine limbs had no further therapy (37.5%), eight (33.3%) had subsequent stab phlebectomy, and three had stripping of the GSV and stab phlebectomy. Four limbs had a redo RFA, four limbs had an aborted RFA procedure, and one limb was lost to follow-up. Failure of total GSV occlusion was more often associated with use of a 6F catheter. Complications were generally mild, and there was no postoperative deep vein thrombosis. CONCLUSION: Endovenous ablation of the GSV can be performed safely and effectively as the initial treatment for lower extremity varicose veins. Because most patients show clinical improvement after RFA, an algorithm of reassessment of the limb and branch varicose veins several months post-RFA allows most patients to defer stab phlebectomy.     

Residual varicose veins below the knee after varicose vein surgery are not related to incompetent perforating veins

OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were to investigate the occurrence of residual varicose veins (visible and ultrasonic) at the below-knee level after short-stripping the great saphenous vein (GSV) and to investigate the possible role of preoperative incompetent perforating veins (IPVs) on the persistence of these varicose veins. METHODS: In this prospective study in 59 consecutive patients (74 limbs) with untreated primary varicose veins, a preoperative clinical examination and preoperative color flow duplex imaging were performed. Re-evaluation (clinical examination and color flow duplex imaging) was performed 6 months after surgery. Dissection of the saphenofemoral junction and short-stripping of the GSV from the groin to just below the knee level was performed without additional stab avulsions on the lower leg. The association between postoperative reflux in the three GSV branches below the knee level and preoperative IPV and the association between postoperative visible varicose veins in the GSV below knee level and preoperative IPV were determined with odds ratios with the help of a univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Preoperative varicosities in the GSV below the knee were visible in 62 limbs (70%) and were visible after surgery in 12 limbs (16%). The number of limbs with reflux in the 3 below-knee GSV branches was as follows: anterior branch, 34 (49%) before surgery and 31 (44%) after surgery; main stem, 59 (79%) before surgery and 62 (91%) after surgery; and posterior branch, 49 (67%) before surgery and 46 (63%) after surgery. No statistically significant association between postoperative reflux in the three GSV branches and preoperative IPV nor between postoperative visible varicose veins and preoperative IPV was found. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that reflux in the GSV below knee level after the short-stripping procedure persists in all below-knee GSV branches. Approximately 20% of patients with visible varicose veins in the GSV area below the knee level will have visible varicose veins in this area 6 months after the short-strip procedure. These clinical and ultrasonic residual varicose veins are not significantly related to the presence of preoperative IPV.     

Deep venous thrombosis after radiofrequency ablation of greater saphenous vein: a word of caution

PURPOSE: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of the greater saphenous vein (GSV; "closure") is a relatively new option for treatment of venous reflux. However, our initial enthusiasm for this minimally invasive technique has been tempered by our preliminary experience with its potentially lethal complication, deep venous thrombosis (DVT). METHODS: Seventy-three lower extremities were treated in 66 patients with GSV reflux, between April 2003 and February 2004. There were 48 (73%) female patients and 18 (27%) male patients, with ages ranging from 26 to 88 years (mean, 62 +/- 14 years). RFA was combined with stab avulsion of varicosities in 55 (75%) patients and subfascial ligation of perforator veins in 6 (8%) patients. An ATL HDI 5000 scanner with linear 7-4 MHz probe and the SonoCT feature was used for GSV mapping and procedure guidance in all procedures. GSV diameter determined the size of the RFA catheter used. Veins less than 8 mm in diameter were treated with a 6F catheter (n = 54); an 8F catheter was used for veins greater than 8 mm in diameter (n = 19). The GSV was cannulated at the knee level. The tip of the catheter was positioned within 1 cm of the origin of the inferior epigastric vein (first GSV tributary). All procedures were carried out according to manufacturer guidelines. RESULTS: All patients underwent venous duplex ultrasound scanning 2 to 30 days (mean, 10 +/- 6 days) after the procedure. The duplex scans documented occlusion of the GSV in 70 limbs (96%). In addition, DVT was found in 12 limbs (16%). Eleven patients (92%) had an extension of the occlusive clot filling the treated proximal GSV segment, with a floating tail beyond the patent inferior epigastric vein into the common femoral vein. Another patient developed acute occlusive clots in the calf muscle (gastrocnemius) veins. Eight patients were readmitted and received anticoagulation therapy. Four patients were treated with enoxaparin on an ambulatory basis. None of these patients had pulmonary embolism. Initially 3 patients with floating common femoral vein clots underwent inferior vena cava filter placement. Of the 19 limbs treated with the 8F RFA catheter, GSV clot extension developed in 5 (26%), compared with 7 of 54 (13%) limbs treated with the 6F RFA catheter (P =.3). No difference was found between the occurrence of DVT in patients who underwent the combined procedure (RFA and varicose vein excision) compared with patients who underwent GSV RFA alone (P =.7). No statistically significant differences were found in age or gender of patients with or without postoperative DVT (P = NS). CONCLUSION: Patients who underwent combined GSV RFA and varicose vein excision did not demonstrate a higher occurrence of postoperative DVT compared with patients who underwent RFA alone. Early postoperative duplex scans are essential, and should be mandatory in all patients undergoing RFA of the GSV.     

Duplex ultrasound scan findings two years after great saphenous vein radiofrequency endovenous obliteration

OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical and duplex ultrasound scan findings in the groin and thigh 2 years after great saphenous vein (GSV) radiofrequency endovenous obliteration (RFO). METHODS: Sixty-three limbs in 56 patients with symptomatic varicose veins and GSV incompetence were treated with RFO, usually with adjunctive stab-avulsion phlebectomies, and examined at a median follow-up of 25 months, by using a color-coded, duplex sonography protocol that mandated views in at least two planes of the saphenofemoral junction (SFJ) and its tributaries and at three GSV levels in the thigh. RESULTS: The commonest duplex finding in the groin was an open, competent, SFJ with a < or =5-cm patent terminal GSV segment conducting prograde tributary flow through the SFJ (82%). Despite the presence of a total of 104 patent junctional tributaries, SFJ reflux was uncommon, affecting only five limbs. GSV truncal occlusion was observed in 90% of treated GSVs. Limited segmental treatment was successful in three limbs with a midthigh reflux source well below competent terminal and subterminal valves. Six GSV trunks had partial or no occlusion, but only one refluxed. These were anatomical RFO failures (9.5%) but were clinically improved, including the refluxing limb. Neovascularity was not identified in any groin. Thigh varicosities were observed in 12 limbs, including telangiectasias and isolated small tributary branches. New varicosities, linked to refluxing thigh perforators (two), or patent SFJ tributaries (three), were present in five limbs. CONCLUSION: RFO is the ideological opposite of high ligation without GSV stripping. It leaves physiologic tributary flow relatively undisturbed, does not incite groin neovascularity, eliminates the GSV as a refluxing conduit in >90% of limbs and has a 2-year, postadjunctive phlebectomy varicosity prevalence of 7.9%, with symptom score improvement in 95% of limbs with an initial score higher than zero.     

Fate and clinical significance of saphenofemoral junction tributaries following endovenous laser ablation of great saphenous vein

BACKGROUND: Unlike surgery, endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) abolishes great saphenous vein (GSV) reflux but does not specifically interrupt the GSV tributaries at the groin. The fate and clinical significance of these tributaries were assessed in a prospective study. METHODS: Eight-one legs (70 patients) underwent colour flow duplex ultrasonography 12 months after GSV ablation for primary varicose veins. Saphenofemoral junction (SFJ) reflux, tributary patency, and recurrent or residual varicosities were recorded, and Aberdeen Varicose Vein Severity Scores (AVVSS) were compared with pretreatment values. RESULTS: The GSV had recanalized without evidence of reflux in two patients. None of the 81 legs showed SFJ reflux although one or more patent tributaries were visible in 48 (59 per cent); all were competent. In 32 legs (40 per cent) there was flush GSV occlusion with the SFJ and no tributaries were detectable. One leg showed evidence of neovascularization in the groin. AVVSS values were similar in groups with or without visible tributaries, both before and after EVLA: median (interquartile range) 13.9 (7.6-19.2) before EVLA and 2.9 (0.6-4.8) at follow-up in patients with visible tributaries, and 14.9 (9.2-20.2) and 3.1 (0.8-5.1) respectively in those without. Recurrent varicosities were present in one leg only, due to an incompetent mid-thigh perforating vein. CONCLUSION: Persistent non-refluxing GSV tributaries at the SFJ did not appear to have an adverse impact on clinical outcome 1 year after successful EVLA of the GSV.     

Recurrence rates following external valvular stenting of the saphenofemoral junction: a comparison with simultaneous contralateral stripping of the great saphenous vein.

OBJECTIVES: The incidence of recurrent varicose veins remains high despite the development of new ablative treatments for varicose veins associated with incompetence of the saphenofemoral junction. External valvular stenting (EVS) of the terminal and/or subterminal valves of the great saphenous vein (GSV) provides a reparative, physiological approach that requires long-term evaluation. The aim of this study was to compare recurrences following EVS with perforate invaginate (PIN) stripping of the GSV. METHODS: Included in the study were 193 patients (386 limbs) all of whom underwent simultaneous PIN-stripping of the GSV in one limb and EVS in the contralateral limb. Duplex scanning of the GSV and venous valves established suitability for each procedure. Only valves with visible, mobile cusps on ultrasound imaging are suitable for EVS. Stents were specifically designed Dacron reinforced silicone for left and right saphenofemoral junctions and for the subterminal valve. In a separate group of patients identified from a database where unilateral and bilateral stents had been implanted, 39 limbs with recurrent varices were examined clinically and ultrasonically to determine the aetiology of recurrences. RESULTS: Follow up was available to a maximum of 147 months. The total recurrence rate was 12.4%; stripping (22.2%) and EVS (4.6%) (P<0.01). The residual reflux as measured by postoperative Valsalva on duplex was 9% but rarely was associated with recurrences. The most common cause of recurrence was incompetent perforators and ovarian vein incompetence filling varices of the pudendal veins. CONCLUSION: This non-randomised study included more severely affected limbs in the PIN stripping limbs, favouring a better outcome in the EVS group. In those patients at an early stage of the disease process where venous valve structure is essentially intact, EVS is a physiological alternative to PIN stripping in the treatment of varicose veins.     

下肢静脉曲张伴溃疡患者的病因分析和疗效观察

目的 探讨下肢静脉曲张伴溃疡（C6级）患者的常见病因和治疗效果,为临床诊治提供参考。方法 收集2020年7月至2021年12月深圳市第二人民医院收治的84例下肢静脉曲张伴溃疡患者的临床资料（共86条患肢）,汇总患者的下肢静脉彩色多普勒超声和顺行造影检查数据,观察患肢的髂静脉压迫情况、深静脉瓣膜反流情况和穿通支静脉反流情况。对患者给予综合治疗,比较治疗前后患者的静脉临床严重程度评分（VCSS）,观察治疗效果。结果 下肢静脉曲张伴溃疡患者中,髂静脉压迫患肢62条（72.1%）;深静脉瓣膜反流患肢47条（54.7%）;穿通支静脉反流患肢64条（74.4%）。溃疡患者在术后3个月的随访期内,经过规律换药,溃疡均得到了愈合,随访期内溃疡未再发。所有患者的术后VCSS为（5.83±1.19）分,低于术前的（11.86±1.89）分,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论 下肢静脉曲张伴溃疡患者中存在较高比例的髂静脉压迫、深静脉瓣膜反流、穿通支静脉反流,经过综合治疗后疗效显著。     

Defining the role of extended saphenofemoral junction ligation: a prospective comparative study

OBJECTIVE: This study explores the added effect of extended saphenofemoral junction (SFJ) ligation when the greater saphenous vein (GSV) has been eliminated from participating in thigh reflux by means of endovenous obliteration. GSV obliteration, unlike surgical stripping, can be done with or without SFJ ligation to isolate and study SFJ ligation's specific contribution to treatment results. METHODS: Sixty limbs treated with SFJ ligation and 120 limbs treated without high ligation were selected from an ongoing, multicenter, endovenous obliteration trial on the basis of their having primary varicose veins, GSV reflux, and early treatment dates. RESULTS: Five (8%) high-ligation limbs and seven (6%) limbs without high ligation with patent veins at 6 weeks or less were excluded as unsuccessful obliterations. Treatment significantly reduced symptoms and CEAP clinical class in both groups (P =.0001). Recurrent reflux developed in one (2%) of 49 high-ligation limbs and eight (8%) of 97 limbs without high ligation by 6 months (P =.273). New instances of reflux did not appear thereafter in 57 limbs followed to 12 months. Recurrent varicose veins occurred in three high-ligation limbs and four limbs without high ligation by 6 months and in one additional high-ligation limb and two additional limbs without high ligation by 12 months. Actuarial recurrence curves were not statistically different with or without SFJ ligation (P >.156), predicting greater than 90% freedom from recurrent reflux and varicosities at 1 year for both groups. CONCLUSION: These early results suggest that extended SFJ ligation may add little to effective GSV obliteration, but our findings are not sufficiently robust to warrant abandonment of SFJ ligation as currently practiced in the management of primary varicose veins associated with GSV vein reflux.     

Clinical significance of ostial great saphenous vein reflux.

PURPOSE: To evaluate anatomical and haemodynamic differences in patients with great saphenous vein (GSV) insufficiency by duplex scanning and air plethysmography. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Duplex scanning and air plethysmography examination were undertaken. One hundred and twenty-one limbs in 91 patients were selected prospectively and divided into three groups: group A consisted of 27 controls; group B consisted of 25 limbs with GSV reflux and normal saphenous femoral junction (SFJ) and group C consisted of 69 limbs of patients with GSV and SFJ reflux. The presence of reflux and GSV diameter (SFJ, proximal and medial thirds of the thigh, the knee and medial and distal thirds of the calf) were assessed by duplex scanning. Air plethysmography was used to evaluate haemodynamic parameters: total venous volume (VV), venous filling index (VFI), residual volume fraction (RVF) and ejection fraction (EF). RESULTS: There was a significant difference in GSV diameter among the three groups in almost all segments evaluated (e.g. medial thigh group A = 2.4 SD 0.3 mm; B = 3.2 SD 0.7 mm; C = 5.9 SD 2.2mm p<0.001, Anova). A significant difference in VFI was found among the groups (group A = 1.2 SD 0.5; B = 2.0 SD 1.4; C = 4.0 SD 2.5 p<0.05, Anova). VV was statistical different between groups A and C (p = 0.004) and B and C(p = 0.03). EF and RVF were comparable in all groups. The VFI was normal in 68% in group B comparing with only 14.5% in group C patients, finding a reflux more than 5ml/s (determined by VFI) in 26.1% of the group C patients, comparing with only 4% of group B patients (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: We have shown that in patients with GSV reflux those with incompetence of the ostial valve of the GSV show greater venous reflux and dilatation of the saphenous trunk than those in whom the ostial valve is competent.     

Validation of a new duplex derived haemodynamic effectiveness score, the saphenous treatment score, in quantifying varicose vein treatments

ObjectivesTo evaluate a duplex-derived score for varicose vein treatments using numerical values of haemodynamic effectiveness.DesignThe saphenous treatment score (STS) was developed prospectively to compare the effect of endovenous treatments on reflux within saphenous segments.PatientsSixty-six patients were randomised to endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) or ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy (UGFS) to the great saphenous vein (GSV).MethodsAssessments included the Aberdeen varicose vein severity score (AVVSS), the venous clinical severity score (VCSS), the venous filling index (VFI) and the STS.ResultsA mean STS of 5.70 decreased to 3.30, P < .0005, post-treatment. The median (IQR) AVVSS, VCSS and VFI (ml/sec) decreased from 21.52(15.48) to 18.86(11.27), P = .14, from 6(4) to 3(4), P < .0005 and from 7.1(6.9) to 1.9(.9) P < .0005, respectively. In 15 patients requiring additional UGFS the mean STS values decreased from 5.8 to 4.13 and then to 2.6 P < .0005, respectively. The individual above and below knee mean treatment differences in STS on 38 EVLA and 28 UGFS patients were 1.92 and .87 (EVLA) compared to 1.57and .29 (UGFS) P = .001, respectively.ConclusionsThe STS has been shown to grade the haemodynamic effects of different treatments as well as ongoing treatments on the GSV.