Humanes Papillomavirus und Analkarzinom

The incidence of anal cancer is increasing worldwide, especially in male homosexual patients. The main risk factor for development of anal cancer is anal infection with the human papillomavirus (HPV). The prevalence of anal HPV infection in HIV-negative homosexual men is 50–60%, while in HIV-positive homosexual men the prevalence is nearly 100%. HPV-related anal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN) is the putative precursor of anal cancer. AIN can be found in approximately 20% of HIV-negative homosexual men and 5–10% of these patients have high-grade dysplasia (AIN II–III). The prevalence of high-grade dysplasia in HIV-positive homosexual men is, however, significantly higher being up to 50%. Despite the prevalence of HPV-related anal dysplasia and the increasing number of patients with anal cancer, there is still a lack of consensus regarding screening, surveillance and therapy of patients with AIN. The standard treatment for anal cancer is still radiochemotherapy with 5-FU and mitomycin C independent of the HPV or HIV status.     

HPV in anal squamous cell carcinoma and anal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN)

Background and aims Majority of cases of anal squamous cell carcinoma are human papilloma virus (HPV)-induced and result from anal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN). This study was conducted to examine methods which may enable the routine diagnosis of HPV-induced changes in the anal rim and the consequences of such detection especially in view of a more sensitive diagnosis of AIN. Results were clinically correlated.Methods The study included biopsy samples from 87 patients who had been diagnosed with the following disease patterns: 47 invasive anal carcinoma, 33 AIN of varying severity and seven condylomatous lesions. In 52 of these cases, a tumour was clinically suspected. All biopsies were retrospectively examined for microscopic indications of HPV infection. After microdissection, additional HPV analysis via PCR was carried out.Results In 38 of 47 cases of anal carcinoma, HPV DNA could be detected via PCR (80.9%), the majority of which were HPV 16 (33/38=86.8%). In 29 of the 33 cases of AIN, HPV DNA was detected (87.9%), most of these in AIN III (15/16=93.8%). Histological markers of HPV infection were detected in all 87 cases.Discussion In our series, the clinical diagnosis of the invasive anal carcinoma had a high sensitivity of 93.6%, with a specificity of 80%. The positive predictive value was 84.6%, and the negative predictive value 91.4%. In contrast, AIN had been detected clinically in none of the cases. In this situation, especially with high-risk patients, our findings recommend anal HPV screening in combination with anal cytology and anoscopy.Conclusion Based on our results, we urgently recommend for any histological report on excision of anal lesions to include a statement whether histological markers of HPV infection were detected. In individual cases, validation via HPV PCR must be considered.     

A trial of SGN-00101 (HspE7) to treat high-grade anal intraepithelial neoplasia in HIV-positive individuals

OBJECTIVES: To test a therapeutic vaccine consisting of a fusion of the human papillomavirus (HPV) 16 E7 protein and the Mycobacterium bovis heat shock protein 65 (SGN-00101) to treat high-grade anal intraepithelial neoplasia (HG-AIN) in HIV-positive individuals. DESIGN: A phase I/II trial with three cohorts of five participants each, sequentially assigned to receive 100, 500 or 1000 microg SGN-00101, injected three times subcutaneously in alternating thighs at 4-week intervals. Anal disease was assessed at baseline, 8, 12, 24 and 48 weeks and was classified as the more severe of anal cytology and anal biopsy. Anal HPV DNA was detected using L1 consensus primer-based PCR followed by type-specific probing and dot-blot hybridization (DBH). HPV16, 18 and 31 DNA copy numbers were measured using quantitative real-time PCR. SETTING: University-based research clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Thirteen HIV-positive men and two HIV-positive women with HG-AIN. RESULTS: There were no drug-related serious adverse events or significant changes in HIV viral load and CD4/CD8 ratio. At 48 weeks, two of five participants in both the 100 and 500 microg cohorts regressed to AIN 1 and one of five participants in the 1000 microg cohort regressed to atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US). All participants had at least one oncogenic HPV type at baseline. Three of five (60%) participants who regressed to AIN 1 or ASC-US became HPV-negative using DBH and real-time PCR, compared with none of 10 participants with no clinical response (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: SGN-00101 was well tolerated in HIV-positive individuals, with preliminary evidence for clinical activity.     

Anal intraepithelial neoplasia in the highly active antiretroviral therapy era among HIV-positive men who have sex with men

OBJECTIVES: The incidence of anal cancer among men who have sex with men (MSM) has continued to increase since the introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). The prevalence of the putative anal cancer precursor, anal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN) was high among HIV-positive MSM prior to the availability of HAART but little is known about AIN since HAART was introduced. We characterized the prevalence of AIN among HIV-positive MSM and examined the association between AIN and various factors including use of HAART. DESIGN AND METHODS: A baseline point-prevalence analyses in a prospective cohort study of AIN was performed at a university-based research clinic. A total of 357 HIV-positive MSM with no history of anal cancer completed a questionnaire detailing behaviors and medical history, anal cytology and human papillomavirus (HPV) testing, and high-resolution anoscopy with biopsy for detection of AIN. RESULTS: Eighty-one percent of participants with available CD4+ cell counts at baseline had AIN of any grade; 52% had AIN 2 or 3; and 95% had anal HPV infection. In multivariate analysis, detection of > or = 6 HPV types [odds ratio (OR), 36; 95% confidence interval (CI), 7.4-171) and use of HAART (OR, 10; 95% CI, 2.6-38) were associated with AIN after adjustment for length of time participants were HIV-positive, CD4+ cell count and HIV viral load. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of AIN has remained high among HIV-positive MSM after the introduction of HAART. Our data indicate that HAART is not associated with a reduced prevalence of AIN and support measures to prevent anal cancer among HIV-positive MSM whether or not they are using HAART.     

Improving the screening of precancerous anal lesions in high-risk subjects with normal cytology: A longitudinal cohort study using simple tests

For patients at high risk of anal cancer, annual screening strategies using invasive evaluation methods are stressful. According to a normal examination at baseline using simple and non invasive tests, the aim of the work was to quantify neoplastic events.Patients and methodData from patients with a normal evaluation at the first visit were retrospectively extracted from a prospective database. The individual follow-up period was at least two years and three evaluations. Patients with abnormal cytology were assessed using high-resolution anoscopy and targeted biopsies.ResultsA total of 182 subjects (F/M: 10/90, aged 48.1(10.6) years, HIV: 81%) were followed for 41(11) months. Anal cytology remained normal in 94 patients (52%), but high-grade anal neoplasms occurred in 28 patients (15%). Patients with a negative HPV16 status at baseline had cumulative probabilities of high-grade AIN of 0.4%(0.1%-1.9%), 2.6%(1.2%-5.9%) and 7.5%(4.5%-12.2%) after 1 year, 2 years and 3 years of follow-up, respectively. These probabilities were lower than those of patients with a positive HPV16 at baseline and those with a previous history of AIN.ConclusionIn patients with normal cytology and negative HPV16 at baseline, a three-year interval screening may be a less cumbersome alternative to traditional annual screening.     

Anal cancer in renal transplant patients

Purpose A comprehensive literature review was performed to examine the prevalence of anal cancer, anal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN) and anal human papillomavirus (HPV) infection in renal transplant recipients who are at risk of anal cancer due to iatrogenic immunosuppression.Methods Pertinent articles were identified from searches performed on the National Center for Biotechnology Information database using the following keywords: anal cancer, AIN, screening, renal transplant (or kidney transplant), organ transplant recipients and post-transplant malignancies.Results The prevalence of AIN is 20% in renal transplant patients. The prevalence of anal HPV infection in established transplant patients is 47%, and the prevalence of anal HPV infection in new transplant patients is 23%. The relative risk for anal cancer in renal transplant patients is 10.Conclusions As compared to HIV-positive male patients who practise anal intercourse, renal transplant patients showed a modest rise in relative risk for anal cancer. Screening programmes to detect AIN in HIV-positive patients who practise anal intercourse have been introduced on a preliminary basis in sexual health clinics in the US and may become standard practise in this population. The case for screening in renal transplant patients is unclear and would merit further investigation, especially with reference to the prevalence of anal HPV infection in this population. It may transpire that renal transplant patients would benefit more from HPV prophylaxis rather than screening for AIN.     

A retrospective clinical study of the treatment of high-grade anal dysplasia by infrared coagulation in a population of HIV-positive men who have sex with men

HIV-positive men who have sex with men (MSM) are at high risk of developing human papillomavirus-associated anal squamous cell cancer. Similar to the management of cervical dysplasia, clinicians are treating high-grade anal dysplasia to prevent progression to cancer. Initial treatments such as cold scalpel excision and electrofulguration have shown limited efficacy in a HIV-positive population. Infrared coagulation (IRC) is an outpatient treatment for high-grade anal dysplasia. This retrospective clinical study reports on 68 HIV-positive MSM with 78 biopsy proven high-grade anal lesions. Each lesion was treated with the IRC with re-biopsy of the treatment site a mean of 140 days later. Of the 74 evaluable lesions; 39 had anal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN) 1, 20 had AIN 2, seven had AIN 3, and eight had normal epithelium. The IRC showed 64% efficacy per treated lesion and shows promise as a treatment modality for high-grade anal dysplasia in this population.     

Anal carcinoma: incidence and effect of cumulative infections

INTRODUCTION: Human papilloma virus (HPV) causes anal condyloma that is a risk factor for anal carcinoma. The incidence and mechanism of invasive anal carcinoma in patients with anal condyloma are prospectively determined. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1993 to 2002, 228 consecutive patients (164 HIV positive) with anal canal condylomas were included in the study, after curing of their lesions. They were asked to attend follow-up visits at 3- or 6-month intervals. We checked for anal co-infection with syphilis, gonococci, viruses (Epstein-Barr virus, cytomegalovirus, herpes simplex, HPV types), and quantified Langerhans' cells (LC) in anal mucosa at baseline and during follow up. We cured and analysed relapsed condylomas during follow up (3-112 months; median 26). Serum HIV loads and CD4 T-lymphocyte counts were determined at each visit and the densities of LC in consecutive specimens from patients with cancers were compared with that for a matched control group (n = 23). RESULTS: Analysis of 199 patients showed high-grade dysplasia (HGD) in 13.6% of patients, more in HIV-positive (16%) than in HIV-negative (6%) patients at baseline. During follow up, 3.5% (7/199; six HIV positive) patients developed invasive carcinoma after 13-108 months and 112 (56%) patients relapsed condylomas. HIV and anal co-infection were identified as independent risk factors (P < 0.01) for HGD and cancer: odd ratio (95% confidence interval) of 9.4 (2.4-37.4) and 3.67 (0.95-14.2), respectively. LC densities in anal mucosa were lower in patients with invasive carcinoma than in controls. CONCLUSION: The risk of invasive carcinoma in HPV-infected patients is increased by HIV and anal co-infection. Decreases in LC numbers in anal mucosa may favour this outcome.     

HPV infection and intraepithelial lesions from the anal region: how to diagnose?

In the last years, the prevalence of HPV infection in the anal region has increased, especially in some groups like homosexual and HIV-positive people. Since this infection can be associated with the development of squamous anal cancer due to its progression from HPV infection to anal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN) and finally to cancer, the screening and evaluation of these conditions are important. Anal cytology and high resolution anoscopy are good methods that are available and can be used. Although useful, these methods should be performed correctly and not indiscriminately in all patients. Patients for whom anal cytology screening is recommended are: HIV-infected patients, homosexuals, women who present with high-grade vulvar squamous intraepithelial neoplasia, vulvar cancer or cervical cancer. An abnormal anal cytology should be further evaluated with high resolution anoscopy.     

Anal intraepithelial neoplasia and squamous cell carcinoma in HIV‐infected adults

Anal cancer is one of the most common non‐AIDS‐defining malignancies in the era of combination antiretroviral therapy. Its precursor lesion, anal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN), is highly prevalent in HIV‐infected populations. More than 90% of anal squamous cell cancers are attributable to human papillomavirus (HPV). While the biology of HPV‐related intraepithelial neoplasia is consistent across lower anogenital sites, the natural history of AIN is not well established and cannot be assumed to be identical to that of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Screening strategies to prevent anal cancer should be developed based on robust natural history data in HIV‐infected and uninfected populations. Likewise, treatments need to be tested in randomized clinical trials, and reserved for those at significant risk of progression to cancer. This review covers the epidemiology, pathogenesis and immunology of HPV infection, AIN and anal cancer, and summarizes the current diagnosis, screening and treatment strategies in HIV‐infected adults.     

Anal intraepithelial neoplasia in heterosexual and homosexual HIV-positive men with access to antiretroviral therapy

BACKGROUND: Studies of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive men have demonstrated high rates of anal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN), a precursor to anal carcinoma, mostly in white homosexual men and men not receiving effective antiretroviral therapy (ART). METHODS: Ninety-two participants--53% Latino, 36% African American, and 40% without a history of receptive anal intercourse (RAI)--were evaluated with a behavioral questionnaire, liquid-based anal cytological testing, Hybrid Capture 2 human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA assay and polymerase chain reaction, and anal colposcopy with biopsy of lesions. RESULTS: High-risk HPV DNA was identified in 61%, and this was associated with a history of RAI (78% vs. 33%; P<.001); 47% had abnormal cytological results, and 40% had AIN on biopsy. In multivariate analysis, both were associated with a history of RAI (odds ratio [OR], 10 [P<.001] and OR, 3.6 [P=.02], respectively) and lower nadir CD4(+) cell counts (P=.06 and P=.01). Current ART use was protective (OR, 0.09; P<.01 and OR, 0.18; P=.02). CONCLUSIONS: Although anal infections with high-risk HPV and AIN in HIV-positive men are associated with a history of RAI, both conditions are commonly identified in HIV-positive men without this history. Both lower nadir CD4(+) cell counts and lack of current ART were associated with AIN but not with the detection of anal HPV.     

Diagnosis,Treatment, and Prevention of Anal Cancer

Rare in the general population, anal cancer has reached epidemic proportions among HIV-infected men who have sex with men (MSM). These cancers are human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated, usually HPV type16, and are analogous to cervical cancer. At present, the rates of anal cancer in this group are 10-fold higher than that of cervical cancer occurring in women in the general population. Although there are no national guidelines for screening for anal intraepithelial dysplasia (AIN), many large HIV clinics are now performing anal cytologic screening in their at-risk patients. This paper outlines the current approach to screening for AIN and its management.     

Description of a pilot anal pap smear screening program among individuals attending a Veteran's Affairs HIV clinic

Despite the higher risk of anal cancer among HIV-infected individuals currently there are no national or international guidelines for anal dysplasia screening. We assessed acceptance and feasibility of screening for anal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN), the rate of abnormalities, and relationship between the presence of AIN and a history of receptive anal intercourse. Eighty-two percent of HIV-patients approached during routine clinic visit agreed to participate in the study with anal Pap smear collection; 53% had abnormal cytology results and among those undergoing high-resolution anoscopy with biopsy, 55% had high-grade AIN, including 2 cases of carcinoma in situ. Anal cytology was well accepted and it was feasible to be incorporated into HIV primary care practice. Abnormal cytology was not significantly associated with history of anal intercourse (p?=?0.767). The high rate of abnormal results reinforces the need for further evaluation of the role of systematic anal Pap smear screening for HIV patients.     

Utilidad de la detección del virus del papiloma humano en el cribado de neoplasia intraepitelial anal en pacientes con conductas de riesgo

Introduction

The incidence of intraepithelial anal neoplasia is increasing in certain risk behaviour groups, and human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is involved in its pathogenesis. The systematic use of anal cytology, and more recently HPV detection by hybrid capture and genotyping, have been introduced into screening programs in recent decades.

Material and methods

A retrospective cohort study was carried out on individuals with risk behaviours of developing intraepithelial anal neoplasia and who attended Sexually Transmitted Infections clinics in the Dermatology area of the Hospital Costa del Sol from January 2010 to December 2012. The intraepithelial anal neoplasia screening was performed using anal cytology and HPV genotyping.

Results

Half (50%) of the study population were HIV positive. A high frequency of anal dysplasia and presence of HPV in cytology (82.1%) and genotype (79%) was found. A statistically significant association (P < .005) was obtained between the presence of high-risk HPV genotypes and the presence of high-grade dysplasia in the second directed cytology. HPV genotyping enabled 17 cases (22%) of severe dysplasia to be identified that were under-diagnosed in the first cytology.

Conclusion

Cases of high-grade dysplasia can be under-diagnosed by a first anal cytology. Detection of HPV can supplement this procedure, leading to the identification of those patients most at risk of developing high-grade anal dysplasia.     

Long-term outcomes in children with pulmonary arterial hypertension treated with bosentan in real-world clinical settings

Treatment algorithms in pediatric pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) are derived from clinical trials in adult populations and from clinical practice, but experience in children is limited. In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed outcomes in a previously identified cohort of 86 consecutive children with PAH treated with bosentan as part of their treatment regimen. All children with idiopathic PAH or heritable PAH and PAH associated with congenital heart disease or connective tissue disease who started bosentan treatment from May 2001 to April 2003 in 2 tertiary pediatric referral centers were followed, with data collection ending August 2006. Eighty-six children (37 male, 49 female) 11 ± 5 years of age with idiopathic/heritable PAH (n = 36), PAH associated with congenital heart disease (n = 48), or PAH associated with connective tissue disease (n = 2) received bosentan as monotherapy (n = 42) or as an add-on to pre-existing continuous intravenous epoprostenol or subcutaneous treprostinil (n = 44). Median observation period was 39 months (range 2 to 60). Thirty-four patients (40%) received ≥1 additional PAH-specific therapy during follow-up. At end of data collection, 25 patients (29%) remained on bosentan, 43 (50%) had stopped bosentan, 11 (13%) had died while on bosentan, and 7 were lost to follow-up. At 4 years, the Kaplan-Meier estimate of disease progression in patients while on bosentan was 54% (7 patients at risk) with a survival estimate of 82% (16 patients at risk). Risk factors significantly associated with survival were World Health Organization functional class and indexed pulmonary vascular resistance. In conclusion, outcome in children with PAH managed with current treatment regimens appears favorable. However, despite current therapy options, disease progression remains a concern.     

Screening and therapy of anal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN) and anal carcinoma in patients with HIV-infection

Anal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN) is a potential precursor of invasive anal carcinoma. Introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) in the treatment of HIV infection substantially reduced the incidence of some diseases associated with opportunistic viral infections. However, the incidence of AIN is reported to increase and HAART seems to have only little impact on the regression or progression of AIN. Paradoxically, improvement of survival in the HAART era results in an increased risk of anal cancer. The incidence of anal carcinoma amongst homosexual men is substantially higher compared to the normal population (35/100.000). This incidence is similar to the incidence of cervical cancer before screening for CIN with cervical cytology. Recent data suggest that the incidence of AIN and anal cancer is even higher among HIV-infected individuals. Both cancer entities share biologic similarities, including the association with human papillomavirus infection (HPV). Screening for CIN with cervical cytology and early treatment has resulted in a significant decline in the incidence of cervical carcinoma. Like cervical cancer, anal carcinoma may be preventable through identification and treatment of its precursors. Future efforts should focus on a screening protocol, training of clinicians in the diagnosis and treatment of AIN and anal carcinoma, and novel approaches to treatment of these lesions. This screening protocol could help to reduce anal cancer in HIV-infection as well as save limited resources in health care system.     

High prevalence of anal squamous intraepithelial lesions and squamous-cell carcinoma in men who have sex with men as seen in a surgical practice

INTRODUCTION: Anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions are probable invasive anal squamous-cell cancer precursors, and although unproved, treatment of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions may prevent progression to anal squamous-cell cancer. Men who have sex with men are often treated for benign anorectal disorders without consideration given to the possibility of concurrent high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions or anal squamous-cell cancer. We determined the prevalence of anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and anal squamous-cell cancer in an urban surgical practice of men who have sex with men referred for treatment of anal condyloma and other benign noncondylomatous anal disorders. METHODS: One hundred thirty-one HIV-positive and 69 HIV-negative men who have sex with men referred for surgical treatment of presumed benign anorectal disease were evaluated by anal cytology, high-resolution anoscopy, and biopsy. Anal cytology and histology were reported with a modified Bethesda classification. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-seven patients (79 percent) were referred for condyloma, 4 (2 percent) for anal squamous intraepithelial lesions (anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions) diagnosed by primary care providers, and 39 (19 percent) for other benign anorectal disorders. One hundred forty-three patients (93 percent) had abnormal anal cytology, with 107 (54 percent) having high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions on cytology. Biopsy results revealed 120 patients (60.0 percent) with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and 5 patients (3 percent) with invasive squamous-cell carcinoma. Four of five men with anal squamous-cell cancer were HIV positive. Fourteen men (36 percent) who have sex with men referred for noncondylomatous benign anal disorders had high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, and three (8 percent) had anal squamous-cell cancer. High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and anal squamous-cell cancer were seen most often at the squamocolumnar junction. CONCLUSIONS: Men who have sex with men referred for treatment of either condyloma or noncondylomatous benign anorectal disease had a high prevalence of anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and anal squamous-cell cancer. All men who have sex with men referred for treatment of benign anorectal disease should have high-resolution anoscopy and aggressive biopsy of all abnormal areas. Treatment of external lesions alone could miss high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions or anal squamous-cell cancer.     

Condylomata, cytological abnormalities and human papillomavirus infection in the anal canal in HIV-infected men

BACKGROUND: Genital infections with low-risk (LR) and high-risk (HR) human papillomavirus (HPV) genotypes are associated with ano-genital condylomata and anal squamous cell cancer. HPV-related pathologies in HIV-infected men are a serious concern. In this study, the prevalence of anal condylomata and their association with cytological abnormalities and HPV infection in the anal canal in HIV-infected men [men who have sex with men (MSM) and heterosexuals] were estimated. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study based on the first visits of patients in the Can Ruti HIV-positive Men (CARH·MEN) cohort. Anal condylomata were assessed by clinical and proctological examination. Samples from the anal canal were collected for HPV genotyping and cytological diagnoses. RESULTS: A total of 640 HIV-infected men (473 MSM and 167 heterosexuals) were included in the study. The overall prevalence of anal condylomata was 25% [157 of 640; 95% confidence interval (CI) 21-28%]; in MSM it was 28% and in heterosexuals it was 15% [odds ratio (OR) 2.2; 95% CI 1.4-3.5]. In patients with anal condylomata, HPV infection in the anal canal was more prevalent (92% vs. 67% in those without anal condylomata; OR 8.5; 95% CI 3.2-22). This higher HPV prevalence involved at least two HPV genotypes (OR 4.0; 95% CI 2.2-7.1), mainly HR genotypes (OR 3.3; 95% CI 1.7-6.4). Similarly, the cumulative prevalence of HPV-6 and HPV-11 was higher in patients with anal condylomata (63% vs. 19% in those without anal condylomata). Having anal condylomata was associated with higher prevalences of cytological abnormalities (83% vs. 32% in those without anal condylomata; OR 6.9; 95% CI 3.8-12.7) and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSILs) (9% vs. 3% in those without anal condylomata; OR 9.0; 95% CI 2.9-28.4) in the anal canal. CONCLUSIONS: HIV-infected men with anal condylomata were at risk of presenting HSILs and harbouring multiple HR HPV infections in the anal canal. Although MSM presented the highest prevalence of anal condylomata, heterosexual men also had a clinically important prevalence. Our findings emphasize the importance of screening and follow-up for condylomata in the anal canal in HIV-infected men.     

Prevalence of high-grade dysplasia and cancer in the anal canal in human papillomavirus-infected individuals

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The incidence of anal cancer is higher in patients with anal canal condyloma, a sexually transmitted disease, than in the general population. We determined the prevalence of anal dysplasia and cancer in patients with anal canal condyloma with respect to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) status, immunity status, and human papillomavirus types. METHODS: In 174 consecutive patients (114 HIV positive, 60 HIV negative) with anal canal condyloma, lesions were cured, and the patients were then followed up prospectively. Langerhans cells (LCs) in normal anal mucosa were quantified, and viruses (Epstein-Barr virus, cytomegalovirus, human simplex virus 1, and various human papillomavirus [HPV] types) were characterized on inclusion. During follow-up (median 26 months), relapsed condylomas were resected and examined histologically. HIV load and CD4 T-lymphocyte counts in serum were determined at each visit. RESULTS: Several factors differed significantly between HIV-positive and HIV-negative patients: LCs/mm anal tissue (15 vs. 30), oncogenic HPV (27% vs. 13%), other current anal infections (44% vs. 0%), and sex ratio (93% vs. 73% male). During follow-up, condylomas relapsed in 75% of the HIV-positive patients, with 19 high-grade dysplasias (HGDs) and 1 invasive carcinoma, but in only 6% of HIV-negative patients, with 1 HGD. Male sex, HIV positivity, and <15 LCs/mm tissue were independent risk factors for condyloma relapse. HIV positivity, HGD before inclusion, and condyloma relapse were independent risk factors for HGD and cancer. Serum HIV load was associated with relapse, whereas CD4 T-lymphocyte counts were not. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of HGD and carcinoma is higher in HIV-positive than in HIV-negative patients, probably because of HPV activity. HIV-positive patients with high serum HIV load and/or a history of anal dysplasia should be examined by anoscopy, and condylomas should be analyzed histologically.     

The Diagnostic and Therapeutic Challenge of Anal Intraepithelial Neoplasia

Purpose of Review

No single modality of care serves as the defined best practice for the treatment of anal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN). This review aims to present the common treatment modalities germane to AIN while considering evolving evidence.

Recent Findings

AIN affords an opportunity to evaluate and treat patients before the development of invasive diseases. Efforts to screen for AIN have yielded mixed results. The major available pharmacotheraputic and surgical options offer efficacious options to reduce the bioburden of disease but can be met with high levels of recurrent disease. None affords a predictably durable response in severe disease.

Summary

Vaccination as primary prevention will likely reduce the overall upward trend in AIN. Evidence suggests vaccination also affords improvement in recurrent disease. Early evidence reveals potential benefit in multimodal approaches to control AIN. Valuable data is anticipated from the phase III, randomized ANCHOR study evaluating the management of high-grade AIN in HIV +patients.