Technical aspects of immediate breast reconstruction with implants: five year follow-up.

We describe the technical aspects of 249 patients who had immediate breast reconstruction with implants and a follow-up of at least five years. The type of reconstruction was permanent expander prostheses (n=208), permanent prostheses (n=32), and temporary expander prostheses (n=9). The median total number of operations required to complete the reconstruction was 3 (range 1-6) with nipple-reconstruction included. Thirty-two patients developed local complications (13%) and three had systemic complications (1%). Eighteen implants were lost, so the failure rate of reconstruction was 7%. The technique of immediate breast reconstruction with implants is associated with a low overall morbidity. This, combined with earlier reported psychological advantages, no increased risk of cancer relapse, and reasonable cost, indicates the importance of immediate reconstruction with implants in the treatment of breast cancer.     

Oncological results in women with wound complications following mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: A meta-analysis

We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the oncological results in women with wound complications following mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction. A systematic literature search up to August 2022 was performed and 1618 subjects with mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction at the baseline of the studies; 443 of them were with wound complications, and 1175 were with no wound complications as a control. Odds ratio (OR) and mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to assess the oncological results in women with wound complications following mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction using dichotomous or contentious methods with a random or fixed-effect model. The wound complications had a significantly longer length of time to adjuvant therapy (MD, 9.44; 95% CI, 4.07–14.82, P < .001) compared with no wound complications in subjects with mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction. However, no significant difference was found between wound complications and no wound complications in subjects with mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction in breast cancer recurrence (OR, 1.96; 95% CI, 0.95–4.06, P = .07), death rates (OR, 1.95; 95% CI, 0.89–4.27, P = .09), and kind of immediate breast reconstruction (OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.53–1.92, P = .98). The wound complications had a significantly longer length of time to adjuvant, however, no significant difference was found in breast cancer recurrence, death rates, and kind of immediate breast reconstruction. The analysis of outcomes should be done with caution even though no low sample size was found in the meta-analysis but a low number of studies was found in certain comparisons.     

Infection following breast reconstruction

Of 33 patients who underwent 49 breast implantations for reconstructive surgery, 8 (24%) patients developed implant infections. All 8 of these patients were among a subgroup of 15 having immediate breast reconstructions with tissue expander implants after simple or modified radical mastectomy (a 53% infection rate). The infection rate increased substantially when bilateral procedures involving implants were performed as opposed to unilateral implants. Nine implants were removed (an overall implant loss rate of 18%). Patients who underwent other breast reconstruction techniques (i.e., including immediate reconstruction with permanent implants or delayed reconstruction with or without tissue expanders) did not develop infection unless they had had simultaneous immediate reconstruction with a tissue expander in the contralateral breast. The most frequently isolated organism was the coagulase-negative staphylococcus. The study concludes that neither the tissue expander nor immediate reconstruction is a risk factor, but the combination may lead to an unacceptable infection rate, especially in the face of bilateral breast procedures.     

Update on one-stage immediate breast reconstruction with definitive prosthesis after sparing mastectomies

Immediate breast reconstruction after skin and nipple-sparing mastectomies is commonly performed as a two-stage procedure; to overcome the paradox of traditional two-stage tissue expander/implant reconstruction used to create a tight muscular pocket that needs expansion to produce lower pole fullness, while losing the laxity of the mastectomy skin flaps, the authors conceived a subpectoral-subfascial pocket by elevating the major pectoral muscle in continuity with the superficial pectoralis fascia up to the inframammary fold. This alteration allowed for the immediate insertion of the definitive implant.The authors present their experience in 220 cases of immediate one-stage breast reconstructions with definitive prostheses in sparing mastectomies. Immediate and long-term local complications were evaluated. Immediate breast reconstruction with definitive anatomical silicone-filled implants can produce excellent cosmetic results (78.6%) with a low rate of complications (17.7%); these results allow for agreement between oncologic, aesthetic and economic purposes.     

IMMEDIATE BREAST RECONSTRUCTION IN TWO STAGES USING ANATOMICAL TISSUE EXPANSION

Over the last four years, 43 modified radical mastectomies and 13 simple mastectomies were done for 56 patients with breast cancer followed by immediate reconstruction in two stages using anatomical tissue expansion. In 49 patients a permanent prosthesis was successfully implanted while three patients refused a further operation, and four required removal of the expander. Complications were seen in 21 cases, including infection (n=4), Baker III-IV contractures (n=5), radiodermitis with breast distorsion (n=3), and seroma (n=2). Four patients required removal of the expander, and no further attempts were made to reconstruct the breast. All 10 patients given radiotherapy developed some kind of complication. After a mean follow up of 2.5 years (range 6-48 months), the aesthetic result was rated 6.9 and patient satisfaction 7.8 on a 0-10 scale. We concluded that immediate breast reconstruction with anatomical tissue expansion gives predictable aesthetic results, which satisfied most patients. Although the complication rate is high, it does not exceed complication rates associated with mastectomy alone or delayed reconstruction. At present, only patients undergoing preoperative or postoperative radiotherapy and hesitant patients are not considered to be candidates for this procedure.     

Acute upper limb infections in a regional Scottish plastic surgery unit during COVID-19: Lessons learned

IntroductionSmoking is a risk factor for post-operative complications following breast reconstruction. Abruptly refraining from all nicotine products may be difficult for patients with a new cancer diagnosis. The goal of this study is to assess complications following a distinct approach to tissue expander reconstruction in nicotine users.MethodsPatients who underwent tissue expander reconstruction after mastectomy were retrospectively reviewed. The approach to optimize outcomes in smokers was to delay reconstruction at least 7 days after the mastectomy and place the expander submuscularly (Group I). The other patients underwent standard immediate reconstruction on the day of mastectomy and were divided into Group II (active smokers) and Group III (non-smokers). Group III was considered the control group.ResultsThere was a total of 195 patients (323 breast reconstructions): Group I (10 patients, 19 expanders); Group II (11 patients, 19 expanders) and Group III (174 patients, 285 expanders). In Group I, n = 1/19 breasts had wound dehiscence requiring surgical management, compared to n = 18/285 in Group III (p = 1.0). Group II exhibited more wound dehiscence (n = 6/19) compared to Group III (p = 0.002). There was no significant difference when comparing wound dehiscence in prepectoral expander placement (7.0%) versus submuscular placement (4.8%) in Group III (p = 0.60).ConclusionNicotine users who are offered tissue expander breast reconstruction 1) at least 7 days after the mastectomy (to allow for vascular delay and demarcation) and 2) in the submuscular plane can normalize their risk of skin necrosis to that of non-smokers who have standard (prepectoral or submuscular) reconstruction on the day of mastectomy.     

可扩张乳房假体在一期乳房再造术中的应用

目的探讨乳癌根治术后应用可扩张乳房假体置入一期乳房再造术的适应证、手术方法、手术效果。方法2002年1月至2006年3月，30例患者采用乳癌根治术后可扩张乳房假体置入一期乳房再造术，其中5例保留了乳头乳晕。结果手术效果较为满意，3例乳房出现微小并发症，其中2例皮瓣局灶坏死，另1例出现乳头乳晕部分坏死。结论可扩张乳房假体置入乳房再造术适用于不适合单纯乳房假体置入法乳房再造术者，其与先行扩张器置入进行皮肤软组织扩张，然后置换乳房假体的乳房再造方法相比，减少了1次大手术，术后恢复快，不增加额外瘢痕。     

背阔肌皮瓣联合假体在乳腺癌患者Ⅰ期乳房重建中的临床应用

目的介绍背阔肌皮瓣联合假体应用于乳腺癌患者Ⅰ期乳房重建的临床经验。方法回顾性分析14例应用背阔肌皮瓣联合假体行乳腺癌术后Ⅰ期乳房重建病例的临床资料,其中患者平均年龄44.2(20~54)岁,Ⅰ期乳腺癌4例,Ⅱa期8例,Ⅱb期2例。经背部和腋部切口分别为6例和8例。结果手术后无皮瓣坏死;无伤口感染;供区血清肿5例(35.7%),均经穿刺抽液治愈。平均随访32.6(4~58)月,2例患者接受了放射治疗未发现不良后果,患者对再造乳房形态非常满意8例,满意5例,一般1例,无不满意患者,乳房美学评价按照Ueda标准均6分,优良率为100%。结论对于选择性的乳腺癌患者,乳房切除后背阔肌皮瓣联合假体Ⅰ期乳房重建是一种并发症少、手术效果良好的乳房重建方法 。     

Postoperative Expansion is not a Primary Cause of Infection in Immediate Breast Reconstruction with Tissue Expanders

Perioperative infection is the most common and dreaded complication associated with tissue expander (TE) breast reconstruction. Historically, the expansion period was thought to be the time of greatest hazard to the implant. However, recent institutional observations suggest infectious complications occur prior to expansion. This investigation, therefore, was conducted to determine the timing of infectious complications associated with two‐stage TE breast reconstructions. Following IRB approval, a retrospective review of all consecutive two‐stage immediate TE breast reconstructions at a single institution from November 2007 to November 2011 was conducted. Reconstructions were then divided into two cohorts: those suffering infectious complications and those that did not. Infectious complications including minor cellulitis, major cellulitis, abscess drainage, and explantation were identified. Various operative and patient variables were evaluated in comparison. Eight hundred ninety immediate two‐stage TE breast reconstructions met inclusion criteria. Patients suffering infection were older (55.4 years versus 49.3 years; p < 0.001), and more likely to have therapeutic mastectomy (94% versus 61%; p < 0.0001), the use of acellular dermal matrix (ADM; 72.5% versus 54.9%; p = 0.001), and greater initial TE fill (448.6 mL versus 404.7 mL; p = 0.0078). The average time to developing of infectious symptoms was 29.6 days (range 9–142 days), with 94.6% (n = 87) of infections prior to the start of expansion. Perioperative infections in immediate two‐stage TE to implant breast reconstructions are significant and occur mostly prior to the start of expansion. Thus, challenging the conventional wisdom that instrumentation during expander filling as the primary cause of implant infections. Possible etiologic factors include greater age, therapeutic mastectomy versus prophylactic mastectomy, larger initial TE fill, and the use of ADM.     

FLUID RETENTION IN BIOPLASTY MISTI GOLD II BREAST PROSTHESES WITH DEVELOPMENT OF CAPSULAR CONTRACTURE

We compared the incidence of capsular contracture in an implant (Bioplasty Misti® Gold II) which has a textured surface and is filled with polyvinyl-pirrolidone (PVP)-hydrogel, with that in saline-filled implants with textured surfaces when the implants are placed subcutaneously during immediate reconstruction after subcutaneous mastectomy. In 41 patients, mean age 55 years (range 30-81), with breast cancer that was not suitable for breast conservation, 20 patients had 22 Misti Gold II prostheses inserted (two patients bilaterally) and 21 patients had saline-filled prostheses (one patient bilaterally). The development of capsular contracture was assessed using Baker's classification and applanation tonometry. Fourteen patients with Misti Gold II implants were classified one year postoperatively as Baker 2 and 3 compared with five with saline-filled implants (p     

Complete tissue expander coverage by musculo-fascial flaps in immediate breast mound reconstruction after mastectomy

Abstract

Immediate breast reconstruction with tissue expander has become an increasingly popular procedure. Complete coverage of the expander by a musculofascial layer provides an additional well-vascularised layer, reducing the rate of possible complications of skin necrosis, prosthesis displacement, and the late capsular contracture. Complete expander coverage can be achieved by a combination of pectoralis major muscle and adjacent thoracic fascia in selected patients. Seventy-five breast mounds in 59 patients were reconstructed, in the first stage a temporary tissue expander inserted immediately after mastectomy and a musculofascial layer composed of the pectoralis major muscle, the serratus anterior fascia, and the superficial pectoral fascia were created to cover the expander. The first stage was followed months later by implant insertion. Minor and major complications were reported in a period of follow-up ranging from 24–42 months (mean 31 months). Complete musculofascial coverage of the tissue expander was a simple and easy to learn technique providing that the patient has a well-formed and intact superficial pectoral and serratus anterior fascia. From a total of 75 breast mounds reconstructed, major complications rate was 4% (overall rate of 19.8%), including major seroma (n = 4), haematoma (n = 1), partial skin loss (n = 3), wound dehiscence (n = 1), major infection (n = 2), severe capsule contracture (n = 1), and expander displacement (n = 3). The serratus anterior fascia and the superficial pectoral fascia flaps can be effectively used as an autologous tissue layer to cover the lower and the lateral aspect of tissue expanders in immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy.     

Immediate breast reconstruction with expander in pregnant breast cancer patients

BackgroundBreast reconstruction after mastectomy is currently considered an essential component in managing breast cancer patients, particularly those diagnosed at a young age. However, no studies have been published on the feasibility of immediate breast reconstruction in patients diagnosed and operated during the course of gestation.MethodWe retrospectively identified all breast cancer patients who were subjected to mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction during pregnancy at the European Institute of Oncology between 2002 and 2012. Patient demographics, gestational age at surgery, tumor stage, adjuvant treatment, details of the surgical procedures, surgical outcomes and fetal outcomes were analyzed.ResultsA total of 78 patients with breast cancer diagnosed during pregnancy were subjected to a surgical procedure during the course of gestation. Twenty-two patients had mastectomy; of whom 13 were subjected to immediate breast reconstruction. Twelve out of 13 patients had a two-stage procedure with tissue expander insertion. Median gestational age at surgery was 16 weeks. No major surgical complications were encountered. Only one patient elected to have an abortion, otherwise, no spontaneous abortions or pregnancy complications were reported. Median gestational age at delivery was 35 weeks (range: 32–40 weeks). No major congenital malformations were reported. At a median follow-up of 32 months, all patients are alive with no long-term surgical complications.ConclusionsThis is the first study of immediate breast reconstruction in pregnant breast cancer patients. Tissue expander insertion appears to ensure a short operative time, and does not seem to be associated with considerable morbidity to the patient or the fetus. Hence, it could be considered in the multidisciplinary management of women diagnosed with breast cancer during pregnancy.     

Operative risk stratification in the obese female undergoing implant‐based breast reconstruction

The prevalence of obesity is growing, and breast reconstruction in the obese patient is becoming the norm rather than the exception. Our aim was to evaluate implant reconstruction outcomes in the obese female in the presence of coincident surgical risk factors and identify potential risk‐reducing interventions. A review of consecutive obese women (BMI ≥ 30) who underwent mastectomy and implant breast reconstruction was performed. Patient demographics, comorbidities, oncologic treatments, and reconstructive procedures and their complications were recorded. A total of 151 women (242 breast reconstructions) were included with mean follow‐up of 28 months. Average BMI was 36. Eighty percent of cases were immediate and 20% delayed. ADMs were utilized in 58% of cases. About 25% of patients had diabetes with one‐third achieving perioperative glycemic control. About 18% of women were active smokers, and 33% had radiotherapy. Major and minor complications occurred in 42% and 11% of patients, respectively. About 24% of reconstructed breasts required implant removal. Obese patients with prior radiation were three times as likely to develop infection (P = 0.008) and 2.5× as likely to undergo explantation (P = 0.002). Skin flap necrosis was three times as likely in obese smokers (P = 0.01). Increased rates of wound breakdown were identified in obese patients with increasing age (P = 0.005), smoking (P = 0.0035), and radiation (P = 0.023). In the obese radiated and smoking patient subgroups, surgical modifications (use of autologous tissue, delayed breast reconstruction timing, and no ADM) were associated with reduction in the relative risk for implant complications. While obesity alone increases implant breast reconstruction complication rates, the presence of additional risk factors compounds these rates. The use of surgical modifications may reduce the occurrence of perioperative complications in the obese female with coincident surgical risk factors undergoing implant breast reconstruction.     

Pre‐mastectomy Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy: A Strategy to Enhance Outcomes in Immediate Breast Reconstruction

The pre‐mastectomy sentinel lymph node biopsy (PM‐SLNB) is a technique that provides knowledge regarding nodal status prior to mastectomy. Because radiation exposure is associated with poor outcomes in breast reconstruction and reconstructed breasts can interfere with the planning and delivery of radiation therapy (RT), information regarding nodal status has important implications for patients who desire immediate breast reconstruction. This study explores the safety and utility of PM‐SLNB as part of the treatment strategy for breast cancer patients desiring immediate reconstruction. We reviewed the charts of adult patients (≥18 years old) who underwent PM‐SLNB from January 2004 to January 2011 at our institution. PM‐SLNB was offered to patients with stage I or IIa, clinically and/or radiographically node‐negative breast cancer who desired immediate breast reconstruction following mastectomy. PM‐SLNB was also offered to patients with ductal carcinoma in situ if features concerning for invasive carcinoma were present. Ninety‐one patients underwent PM‐SLNB of 94 axillae. PM‐SLNB was positive in 25.5% of breasts (n = 24). Nineteen node‐positive patients (79.2%) have undergone or planning to undergo delayed reconstruction at our institution. Seventeen of these 19 node‐positive patients (89.5%) have received adjuvant RT. Two patients (10.5%) elected against RT despite our recommendation for it. No biopsy‐positive patient underwent immediate reconstruction or suffered a radiation‐induced complication with their breast reconstruction. There were two minor complications associated with PM‐SLNB, both in node‐negative patients. This study demonstrates the utility of PM‐SLNB in providing information regarding nodal status, and therefore the need for adjuvant RT, prior to mastectomy. This knowledge can be used to appropriately counsel patients regarding optimal timing of breast reconstruction.     

The effect of timing of postmastectomy radiation on implant-based breast reconstruction: a retrospective comparison of complication outcomes

Background

The optimal timing of postmastectomy radiation for women undergoing delayed permanent implant exchange continues to remain controversial. The objective of our study is to compare complication rates when tissue expanders are exchanged for permanent implants pre- vs postradiation.

Methods

A retrospective review of 54 consecutive patients who underwent implant-based breast reconstruction and received postmastectomy radiation was conducted. Complications including infection, implant loss, and capsular contracture (measured in Baker score) were compared between the 2 groups.

Results

Of the patients studied, 32 patients had radiation before placement of permanent implants, whereas 22 patients received radiation after implant placement. There was no difference in individual complication rates between the 2 groups.

Conclusions

In our study of 54 patients, the timing of radiation did not affect individual complication rates for patients who underwent implant-based breast reconstruction after immediate tissue expander placement.     

A retrospective review of the incidence of various complications in different delayed breast reconstruction methods

Background: Breast reconstruction is a common standard procedure in many centres after breast cancer surgery. The aim of the present study was to investigate and compare the incidence of various complications in different reconstruction methods. Method: Six hundred and eighty-five patients were retrospectively classified into five groups: (1) Deep inferior epigastric perforator flap (DIEP), (2) latissimus dorsi flap (LD), (3) lateral thoracodorsal flap (LTDF), (4) expander with secondary implant (EXP), and (5) direct implant (DI). Demographic and perioperative data, the incidence of complications, and follow-up data were collected. Results: There was a significant difference between groups regarding overall early complications (p?<?0.001). The DIEP group had the highest incidence of overall complications (50.0%) (p?<?0.05). DIEP also had the highest incidence of fat necrosis (18.3%), skin necrosis (22.1%), and incidence of reoperation for complications (26.9%) compared to the other reconstruction methods. In the entire group of patients, the overall incidence of late complications (occurring >30 days after surgery) that needed surgical corrections was 54.7%. The incidence of late complications was 46.2% for DIEP, 66.4% for LD, 74.8% for LTDF, 44.9% for EXP, and 62.9% for DI. The DIEP group had higher incidences of late local complications (fat necrosis, skin necrosis, haematoma, seroma, and wound rupture combined), and scars requiring treatment than the other reconstruction methods. Conclusion: Meticulous registration of incidence of different complications in five different breast reconstruction methods revealed high complication rates with all methods. The differences in incidence of complications were related to the operation method used. Based on these results, careful individual planning of a breast reconstruction is mandatory.     

Does response to neo‐adjuvant chemotherapy impact breast reconstruction?

Neo‐adjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is administered in breast cancer treatment for downstaging of disease. Here, we determined the impact of response to NAC on breast reconstruction uptake. A prospective NAC and mastectomy database with or without reconstruction were reviewed with IRB approval. Univariable analyses were conducted using Kruskal‐Wallis or Fisher's exact tests. Multivariable logistic regression was used to adjust for potential confounders. We identified 271 patients with unilateral breast cancer receiving NAC and either unilateral or bilateral mastectomy from 9/2013 to 5/2016. Seventy patients (25.8%) had a pCR to NAC. One hundred and seventy‐five patients (64.6%) had immediate reconstruction (IR), and 96 had no IR. On univariable analysis, younger age (P < .001), lower T‐stage at presentation (P < .001), bilateral versus unilateral mastectomy (P<.001) and HR‐negative tumor subtype (P = .006) were significantly associated with higher IR rates. On multivariable analysis, pCR (P = .792) and tumor subtype (P = 0.061) were not significantly associated with IR; T‐stage was significantly associated with IR (P < .001), such that patients with T4 tumors at presentation had lower odds of IR (OR 0.10, 95% CI 0.02‐0.50), even when accounting for response to NAC. One hundred and seventy‐three patients (63.8%) received adjuvant radiation therapy; this was associated with lower IR frequency (P = .048) but was not associated with reconstruction type (tissue expander versus autologous, P = 1.0) among 175 patients who had IR. In patients who have mastectomy after NAC, IR is influenced by age, T‐stage at presentation, and choice of bilateral mastectomy, but not by response to NAC. A subset of patients who are young, with earlier T‐stage and pCR, is more likely to proceed with bilateral mastectomy.     

Multicenter Study on Breast Reconstruction Outcome Using Becker Implants

The use of tissue expanders and implants is the simplest option for breast reconstruction following mastectomy. In the 1980s, Hilton Becker introduced a round, inflatable breast implant that could be used as a permanent implant. Since then, the original implant has been improved in both design and architecture. The new Becker device consists of an anatomical implant composed of 35% cohesive silicone gel in the outer chamber and 65% normal saline in the inner chamber. This multicenter study describes our experience with the new anatomical Becker implants in a large series of patients, in both immediate and delayed breast reconstruction. We reviewed the clinical records of 204 patients who underwent a breast reconstruction with an anatomical Becker-type implant in the sub-muscular position between November 2004 and December 2006. Data on the patients’ characteristics, indications for reconstruction, operative technique, device size used, complications, and need for further operations were collected and analyzed. A total of 248 breast reconstructions were performed in 204 patients. One hundred forty-three patients (70%) underwent an immediate reconstruction; in the remaining 61 cases (30%), the breast reconstruction was performed later. The patients’ age ranged from 26 to 66 years, with a median age of 47.5 years. The implant was placed unilaterally in 160 women (78.5%) and bilaterally in the remaining 44 (21.5%). Complications occurred in 85 cases (34.2%), in both the immediate and delayed reconstruction groups, and were related to wound healing, bleeding, seroma, and problems with the inflatable expanders. Iatrogenic implant rupture was documented in one case (0.4%). Inflation was impossible in 7 cases (2.8%) as a result of valve obstruction (3 cases, 1.2%) and valve displacement (4 cases, 1.6%). Implant malposition was the most troublesome complication; indeed, 34 patients (13.7%) complained of device malposition. Capsular contracture was assessed in all the patients. Significant capsular contracture (Baker grade III and IV) was detected in 6 cases (2.4%) at the follow-up approximately 1 year after surgery. Breast reconstruction with permanent inflatable expanders is widely acknowledged as a useful technique for breast cancer patients undergoing simple or modified radical mastectomy. The use of this device eliminates the need to replace a temporary tissue expander with a breast implant, thus avoiding a second operation. Although we believe autologous tissues afford the best method of reconstruction in the majority of patients, the results of our study show that expander implant placement may yield a reasonable reconstruction.     

Long‐term complications and reconstruction failures in previously radiated breast cancer patients receiving salvage mastectomy with autologous reconstruction or tissue expander/implant‐based reconstruction

Salvage mastectomy (SM) is the standard of care for patients with local recurrence (LR) after breast conservation therapy (BCT), often with immediate reconstruction. Complications of reconstruction are a concern for these patients, and long‐term data are limited. We sought to compare rates of complications requiring re‐operation (CRR) and reconstruction failure (RF) between autologous reconstruction (AR) and tissue expander/implant reconstruction (TE/I). Patients with locally recurrent breast cancer after BCT, treated with SM and immediate AR or TE/I between 2000 and 2008, were identified. CRR was defined as unplanned return to operating room for wound infection, dehiscence, necrosis (including flap, skin, or fat), hematoma, or hernia (for AR) and extrusion, leak, or capsular contracture (for TE/I). RF was defined as conversion to another reconstruction technique or to flat chest wall. This study included 103 patients with 107 reconstructions. Median follow‐up was 6.6 years. CRR and RF were significantly higher with TE/I (n = 34) compared to AR (n = 73) at 5 years (50.9% vs 25.5%; P = 0.02) and (42.1% vs 5.8%; P < 0.001). On univariate analysis (UVA), TE/I (HR = 2.14; P = 0.02) and diabetes (HR = 5.10; P = 0.007) were significant predictors for CRR. On UVA, TE/I (HR = 7.30; P < 0.001) and older age at reconstruction (HR = 1.03; P = 0.003) were significant predictors for RF. In this population of previously irradiated patients, TE/I was associated with significantly higher CRR and RF. Complications continue to occur up to 10 years after TE/I. AR should be considered in appropriately selected patients, though TE/I may remain a reasonable option in patients without high‐risk factors for surgical complications.     

Bilateral immediate two-stage breast reconstruction in patients with unilateral breast cancer: Outcomes analysis and risk assessment

IntroductionContralateral prophylactic mastectomy has the potential to decrease the occurrence of cancer and reduce psychological burden. However, it is known that complications after bilateral mastectomy are higher compared with unilateral mastectomy. Our goal was to evaluate outcomes of immediate breast reconstruction in patients undergoing bilateral mastectomy and to compare complication rates between therapeutic and prophylactic sides.Patients and MethodsElectronic medical records of patients with unilateral breast cancer who underwent bilateral mastectomy and immediate reconstruction with expanders were reviewed. Postoperative complications were compared between therapeutic and prophylactic mastectomy sides.ResultsSixty-two patients were analyzed. The overall complication rate after both stages was 23.9% on the therapeutic side and 16.5% on the prophylactic side. Infection was the most common complication on both sides. All infections on the prophylactic mastectomy side were successfully treated with intravenous (IV) antibiotics (salvage rate of 100%), whereas 35.7% of infected tissue expander/implants on the therapeutic mastectomy side were explanted despite treatment.ConclusionCareful counselling of patients undergoing elective contralateral prophylactic mastectomy is essential as complications can develop in either breast after reconstruction.