Two decades of change in European general practice service profiles: conditions associated with the developments in 28 countries between 1993 and 2012

Objective: Evidence regarding the benefits of strong primary care has influenced health policy and practice. This study focuses on changes in the breadth of services provided by general practitioners (GPs) in Europe between 1993 and 2012 and offers possible explanations for these changes. Design: Data on the breadth of service profiles were used from two cross-sectional surveys in 28 countries: the 1993 European GP Task Profile study (6321 GPs) and the 2012 QUALICOPC study (6044 GPs). GPs’ involvement in four areas of clinical activity (first contact care, treatment of diseases, medical procedures, and prevention) was established using ecometric analyses. The changes were measured by the relative increase in the breadth of service profiles. Associations between changes and national-level conditions were examined though regression analyses. Data on the national conditions were used from various other public databases including the World Databank and the PHAMEU (Primary Health care Activity Monitor) database. Setting: A total of 28 European countries. Subjects: GPs. Main outcome measure: Changes in the breadth of GP service profiles. Results: A general trend of increased involvement of European GPs in treatment of diseases and decreased involvement in preventive activities was observed. Conditions at the national level were associated with changes in the involvement of GPs in first contact care, treatment of diseases and, to a limited extent, prevention. Especially in countries with stronger growth of health care expenditures between 1993 and 2012 the service profiles have expanded. In countries where family values are more dominant the breadth in service profiles decreased. A stronger professional status of GPs was positively associated with the change in first contact care. Conclusions: GPs in former communist countries and Turkey have increased their involvement in the provision of services. Developments in Western Europe were less evident. The developments in the service profiles could only to a very limited extent be explained by national conditions. A main driver of reform seems to be the changes in health care expenditure, which may indicate a notion of urgency because there may be a pressure to curb the rising expenditures.

• Key points

• Broad GP service profiles are an indicator of strong primary care in a country. It is expected that developments in the breadth of GP service profiles are influenced by various national conditions related to the urgency to reform, politics, and means.

• Between 1993 and 2012 the involvement of GPs in European countries in treatment of diseases increased and their involvement preventive activities decreased.

• The national conditions were found to be associated with changes in GPs’ involvement as first contact of care, treatment of diseases, and, to a limited extent, prevention.

• More specifically, in countries with a stronger growth in health care expenditures, service profiles of European GPs have expanded more in the past decades.

     

Self reported involvement in emergency medicine among GPs in Norway

Objective: To examine general practitioners’ (GPs’) perception of their role in emergency medicine and participation in emergency services including ambulance call outs, and the characteristics of the GPs and casualty clinics associated with the GPs’ involvement in emergency medicine.

Design: Cross-sectional online survey.

Setting: General practice.

Subjects: General practitioners in Norway (n?=?1002).

Main outcome measures: Proportion of GPs perceiving that they have a large role in emergency medicine, regularly being on call, and the proportion of ambulance callouts with GP participation.

Results: Forty six percent of the GPs indicated that they play a large role in emergency medicine, 63 percent of the GPs were regularly on call, and 28 percent responded that they usually took part in ambulance call outs. Multivariable logistic regression analyses indicated that these outcomes were strongly associated with participation in multidisciplinary training. Furthermore, the main outcomes were associated with traits commonly seen at smaller casualty clinics such as those with an absence of nursing personnel and extra physicians, and based on the distance to the hospital.

Conclusion: Our findings suggest that GPs play an important role in emergency medicine. Multidisciplinary team training may be important for their continued involvement in prehospital emergencies.

• Key Points

• Health authorities and other stakeholders have raised concerns about general practitioner’s (GPs) participation in emergency medicine, but few have studied opinions and perceptions among the GPs themselves.

• ? Norwegian GPs report playing a large role in emergency medicine, regularly being on call, and taking part in selected ambulance call outs.

• ? A higher proportion of GPs who took part in team training perceived themselves as playing a large role in emergency medicine, regularly being on call, and taking part in ambulance call outs.

• ? These outcomes were also associated with attributes commonly seen at smaller casualty clinics.

     

Reasons for attending a general emergency outpatient clinic versus a regular general practitioner – a survey among immigrant and native walk-in patients in Oslo,Norway

Objective: To explore reasons for attending a general emergency outpatient clinic versus a regular general practitioner (RGP).

Design: Cross-sectional study using a multilingual anonymous questionnaire.

Setting: Native and immigrant walk-in patients attending a general emergency outpatient clinic in Oslo (Monday–Friday, 08:00–23:00) during 2 weeks in September 2009.

Subjects: We included 1022 walk-in patients: 565 native Norwegians (55%) and 457 immigrants (45%).

Main outcome measures: Patients’ reasons for attending an emergency outpatient clinic versus their RGP.

Results: Among patients reporting an RGP affiliation, 49% tried to contact their RGP before this emergency encounter: 44% of native Norwegian and 58% of immigrant respondents. Immigrants from Africa [odds ratio (OR)?=?2.55 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.46–4.46)] and Asia [OR?=?2.32 (95% CI: 1.42–3.78)] were more likely to contact their RGP before attending the general emergency outpatient clinic compared with native Norwegians. The most frequent reason for attending the emergency clinic was difficulty making an immediate appointment with their RGP. A frequent reason for not contacting an RGP was lack of access: 21% of the native Norwegians versus 4% of the immigrants claimed their RGP was in another district/municipality, and 31% of the immigrants reported a lack of affiliation with the RGP scheme.

Conclusions and implications: Access to primary care provided by an RGP affects patients’ use of emergency health care services. To facilitate continuity of health care, policymakers should emphasize initiatives to improve access to primary health care services.

• KEY POINTS

• Access to immediate primary health care provided by a regular general practitioner (RGP) can reduce patients’ use of emergency health care services.

• The main reason for attending a general emergency outpatient clinic was difficulty obtaining an immediate appointment with an RGP.

• A frequent reason for native Norwegians attending a general emergency outpatient clinic during the daytime is having an RGP outside Oslo.

• Lack of affiliation with the RGP scheme is a frequent reason for attending a general emergency outpatient clinic among immigrants.

     

Writing information transfers for out-of-hours palliative care: a controlled trial among GPs

Objective: The aim was to evaluate the effect of the implementation of an information handover form regarding patients receiving palliative care. Outcome was the information available for the out-of-hours GP co-operative. Design: We conducted a controlled trial. Setting: All GPs in Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Intervention: The experimental group (N?=?240) received an information handover form and an invitation for a one-hour training, the control group (N?= 186) did not receive a handover form or training. We studied contacts with the GP co-operative concerning patients in palliative care for the presence and quality of information transferred by the patient's own GP. Main outcome measures: Proportion of contacts in which information was available and proportion of adequate information transfer. Results. Overall information was transferred by the GPs in 179 of the 772 first palliative contacts (23.2%). The number of contacts in the experimental group in which information was available increased significantly after intervention from 21% to 30%, compared to a decrease from 23% to 19% in the control group. The training had no additional effect. The content of the transferred information was adequate in 61.5%. There was no significant difference in the quality of the content between the groups. Conclusion: The introduction of a handover form resulted in a moderate increase of information transfers to the GP co-operative. However, the total percentage of contacts in which this information was present remained rather low. GP co-operatives should develop additional policies to improve information transfer.

• Key Points

• ?The out-of-hours period is potentially problematic for the delivery of optimal palliative care, often due to inadequate information transfer.

• ?Introduction of a handover form resulted in a moderate increase of transferred information.

• ?The percentage of palliative contacts remained low in cases where information was available.

• ?Adequate information was transferred in more than half of the cases.

     

The impact of primary care organization on avoidable hospital admissions for diabetes in 23 countries

Objective: Diabetes is a so-called ambulatory care sensitive condition. It is assumed that by appropriate and timely primary care, hospital admissions for complications of such conditions can be avoided. This study examines whether differences between countries in diabetes-related hospitalization rates can be attributed to differences in the organization of primary care in these countries. Design: Data on characteristics of primary care systems were obtained from the QUALICOPC study that includes surveys held among general practitioners and their patients in 34 countries. Data on avoidable hospitalizations were obtained from the OECD Health Care Quality Indicator project. Negative binomial regressions were carried out to investigate the association between characteristics of primary care and diabetes-related hospitalizations. Setting: A total of 23 countries. Subjects: General practitioners and patients. Main outcome measures: Diabetes-related avoidable hospitalizations. Results: Continuity of care was associated with lower rates of diabetes-related hospitalization. Broader task profiles for general practitioners and more medical equipment in general practice were associated with higher rates of admissions for uncontrolled diabetes. Countries where patients perceive better access to care had higher rates of hospital admissions for long-term diabetes complications. There was no association between disease management programmes and rates of diabetes-related hospitalization. Hospital bed supply was strongly associated with admission rates for uncontrolled diabetes and long-term complications. Conclusions: Countries with elements of strong primary care do not necessarily have lower rates of diabetes-related hospitalizations. Hospital bed supply appeared to be a very important factor in this relationship. Apparently, it takes more than strong primary care to avoid hospitalizations.

• Key points

• Countries with elements of strong primary care do not necessarily have lower rates of diabetes-related avoidable hospitalization.

• Hospital bed supply is strongly associated with admission rates for uncontrolled diabetes and long-term complications.

• Continuity of care was associated with lower rates of diabetes-related hospitalization.

• Better access to care, broader task profiles for general practitioners, and more medical equipment in general practice was associated with higher rates of admissions for diabetes.

     

Cancer patients’ use of primary care out-of-hours services: a cross-sectional study in Norway

Objective: To investigate how cancer patients in Norway use primary care out-of-hours (OOH) services and describe different contact types and procedures.

Design: A retrospective cross-sectional registry study using a billing registry data source.

Setting: Norwegian primary care OOH services in 2014.

Subjects: All patients’ contacts in OOH services in 2014. Cancer patients were identified by ICPC-2 diagnosis.

Main outcome measures: Frequency of cancer patients’ contacts with OOH services, contact types, diagnoses, procedures, and socio-demographic characteristics.

Results: In total, 5752 cancer patients had 20,220 contacts (1% of all) in OOH services. Half of the contacts were cancer related. Cancer in the digestive (22.9%) and respiratory (18.0%) systems were most frequent; and infection/fever (21.8%) and pain (13.6%) most frequent additional diagnoses. A total of 4170 patients had at least one cancer-related direct contact; of these, 64.5% had only one contact during the year. Cancer patients had more home visits and more physicians’ contact with municipal nursing services than other patients, but fewer consultations (p?p?Conclusion: There was no indication of overuse of OOH services by cancer patients in Norway, which could indicate good quality of cancer care in general.

• KEY POINTS

• Many are concerned about unnecessary use of emergency medical services for non-urgent conditions.

• ??There was no indication of overuse of out-of-hours services by cancer patients in Norway.

• ??Cancer patients had relatively more home visits, physician’s contact with the municipal nursing service, and weekend contacts than other patients.

• ??Cancer patients in the least central municipalities had relatively more contacts with out-of-hours services than those in more central municipalities.

     

Care managers can be useful for patients with depression but their role must be clear: a qualitative study of GPs’ experiences

Abstract

Objective: Explore general practitioners’ (GPs’) views on and experiences of working with care managers for patients treated for depression in primary care settings. Care managers are specially trained health care professionals, often specialist nurses, who coordinate care for patients with chronic diseases.

Design: Qualitative content analysis of five focus-group discussions.

Setting: Primary health care centers in the Region of Västra Götaland and Dalarna County, Sweden.

Subjects: 29 GPs.

Main outcome measures: GPs’ views and experiences of care managers for patients with depression.

Results: GPs expressed a broad variety of views and experiences. Care managers could ensure care quality while freeing GPs from case management by providing support for patients and security and relief for GPs and by coordinating patient care. GPs could also express concern about role overlap; specifically, that GPs are already care managers, that too many caregivers disrupt patient contact, and that the roles of care managers and psychotherapists seem to compete. GPs thought care managers should be assigned to patients who need them the most (e.g. patients with life difficulties or severe mental health problems). They also found that transition to a chronic care model required change, including alterations in the way GPs worked and changes that made depression treatment more like treatment for other chronic diseases.

Conclusion: GPs have varied experiences of care managers. As a complementary part of the primary health care team, care managers can be useful for patients with depression, but team members’ roles must be clear.

• KEY POINTS

• A growing number of primary health care centers are introducing care managers for patients with depression, but knowledge about GPs’ experiences of this kind of collaborative care is limited.

• GPs find that care managers provide support for patients and security and relief for GPs.

• GPs are concerned about potential role overlap and desire greater latitude in deciding which patients can be assigned a care manager.

• GPs think depression can be treated using a chronic care model that includes care managers but that adjusting to the new way of working will take time.

     

Potential cardiac arrest – an observational study of pre-hospital medical response

Objectives: A previous study showed that Norwegian GPs on call attended around 40% of out-of-hospital medical emergencies. We wanted to investigate the alarms of prehospital medical resources and the doctors' responses in situations of potential cardiac arrests. Design and setting: A three-month prospective data collection was undertaken from three emergency medical communication centres, covering a population of 816,000 residents. From all emergency medical events, a sub-group of patients who received resuscitation, or who were later pronounced dead at site, was selected for further analysis. Results: 5,105 medical emergencies involving 5,180 patients were included, of which 193 met the inclusion criteria. The GP on call was alarmed in 59 %, and an anaesthesiologist in 43 % of the cases. When alarmed, a GP attended in 84 % and an anaesthesiologist in 87 % of the cases. Among the patients who died, the GP on call was alarmed most frequently. Conclusion: Events involving patients in need of resuscitation are rare, but medical response in the form of the attendance of prehospital personnel is significant. Norwegian GPs have a higher call-out rate for patients in severe situations where resuscitation was an option of treatment, compared with other “red-response” situations.

• Key Points

• This study investigates alarms of and call-outs among GPs and anaesthesiologists on call, in the most acute clinical situations:

• Medical emergencies involving patients in need of resuscitation were rare.

• The health care contribution by pre-hospital personnel being called out was significant.

• Compared with other acute situations, the GP had a higher attendance rate to patients in life-threatening situations.

     

Treatment,transport, and primary care involvement when helicopter emergency medical services are inaccessible: a retrospective study

Abstract

Objective: To examine handling of cancelled helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) missions with a persisting medical indication.

Design: Retrospective observational study.

Setting and subjects: Cancelled HEMS missions with persisting medical indication within Sogn og Fjordane county in Norway during the period of 2010–2013. Both primary and secondary missions were included.

Main outcome measures: Primary care involvement, treatment and cooperation within the prehospital system.

Results: Our analysis included 172 missions with 180 patients. Two-thirds of the patients (118/180) were from primary missions. In 95% (112/118) of primary missions, GPs were alerted, and they examined 62% (70/112) of these patients. Among the patients examined by a GP, 30% (21/70) were accompanied by a GP during transport to hospital. GP involvement did not differ according to time of day (p?=?0.601), diagnostic group (p?=?0.309), or patient’s age (p?=?0.409). In 41% of primary missions, the patients received no treatment or oxygen only during transport. Among the secondary missions, 10% (6/62) of patients were intubated or received non-invasive ventilation and were accompanied by a physician or nurse anaesthetist during transport.

Conclusions: Ambulance workers and GPs have an important role when HEMS is unavailable. Our findings indicated good collaboration among the prehospital personnel. Many of the patients were provided minimal or no treatment, and treatment did not differ according to GP involvement.

• Key Points

• Knowledge about handling and involvement of prehospital services in cancelled helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) missions are scarce.

• Ambulance workers and general practitioners have an important role when HEMS is unavailable

• Minimal or no treatment was given to a large amount of the patients, regardless of which health personnel who encountered the patient.

     

General practitioners’ views on leadership roles and challenges in primary health care: a qualitative study

Objective: To explore general practitioners’ (GPs) views on leadership roles and leadership challenges in general practice and primary health care.

Design: We conducted focus groups (FGs) with 17 GPs.

Setting: Norwegian primary health care.

Subjects: 17 GPs who attended a 5 d course on leadership in primary health care.

Results: Our study suggests that the GPs experience a need for more preparation and formal training for the leadership role, and that they experienced tensions between the clinical and leadership role. GPs recognized the need to take on leadership roles in primary care, but their lack of leadership training and credentials, and the way in which their practices were organized and financed were barriers towards their involvement.

Conclusions: GPs experience tensions between the clinical and leadership role and note a lack of leadership training and awareness. There is a need for a more structured educational and career path for GPs, in which doctors are offered training and preparation in advance.

• KEY POINTS

• Little is known about doctors’ experiences and views about leadership in general practice and primary health care. Our study suggests that:

• There is a lack of preparation and formal training for the leadership role.

• GPs experience tensions between the clinical and leadership role.

• GPs recognize leadership challenges at a system level and that doctors should take on leadership roles in primary health care.

     

Prevalence of persons contacting general practice for psychological stress in Denmark

Objective: The prevalence of psychological stress has previously been estimated based on self-reported questionnaires. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of persons who contact the general practitioner (GP) for psychological stress and to explore associations between psychological stress and characteristics relating to the patient, the GP, and area-specific socioeconomic factors.

Design: Cross-sectional computer assisted journal audit.

Setting: General practice in the Region of Southern Denmark.

Subjects: Patients aged 18–65 years with a consultation during a six-month period that was classified with a stress-related diagnosis code.

Main outcome measures: Six months prevalence of GP-assessed psychological stress and characteristics relating to the patient, the GP, and area-specific socioeconomic factors.

Results: Fifty-six GPs (7% of the invited) identified 1066 patients considered to have psychological stress among 51,422 listed patients. Accordingly, a 2.1% six months prevalence of psychological stress was estimated; 69% of cases were women. High prevalence of psychological stress was associated with female sex, age 35–54 years, high education level and low population density in the municipality, but not with unemployment in the municipality or household income in the postal district. GP female sex and age <50 years, few GPs in the practice and few patients per GP were also associated with a higher prevalence of psychological stress.

Conclusions: A total of 2% of the working-age population contacted the GP during a six-month period for psychological stress. The prevalence of psychological stress varies with age, sex and characteristics of both the regional area and the GP.

• Key points

• Psychological stress is a leading cause of days on sick leave, but its prevalence has been based on population surveys rather than on assessment by health care professionals.

• ??This study found that during six months 2.1% of all working-age persons have at least one contact with the GP regarding psychological stress.

• ??The six months prevalence of psychological stress was associated with patient age and sex, GP age and sex, practices’ number of GPs and patients per GP, and area education and urbanization level.

     

Variations in older people’s use of general practitioner consultations and the relationship with mortality rate in Vantaa,Finland in 2003–2014

Abstract

Objective: It is generally expected that the growth of the older population will lead to an increase in the use of health care services. The aim was to examine the changes in the number of visits made to general practitioners (GP) by the older age groups, and whether such changes were associated with changes in mortality rates.

Design and setting: A register-based observational study in a Finnish city where a significant increase in the older population took place from 2003 to 2014. The number of GP visits made by the older population was calculated, the visits per person per year in two-year series, together with respective mortality rates.

Subjects: The study population consisted of inhabitants aged 65?years and older (65+) in Vantaa that visited a GP in primary health care.

Main outcome measures: The number of GP visits per person per year in the whole older population during the study years.

Results: In 2009–2010, there was a sudden drop in GP visits per person in the younger (65–74?years) age groups examined. In the population aged 85+, use of GP visits remained at a fairly constant level. The mortality rate decreased until the year 2008. After that, the positive trend ended and the mortality rate plateaued.

Conclusions: Simultaneously with the decline in GP visits per person in the older population, the mortality rate leveled off from its positive trend in 2009–2010. Factors identified being associated with the number of GP consultations were organizational changes in primary health care, economic recession causing retrenchment, and even vaccinations during the swine flu epidemic.

• Key points

• Along with an increasingly ageing population, concern over the supply of publicly funded health care has become more pronounced.

• The amount of GP visits of 65+ decreased in primary health care, especially in the youngest groups.

• However, in the oldest age groups (85+), the use of GPs remained unchanged regardless of changes in service supply.

• As the rate of GP visits among the population of 65+ declined, the positive trend in the mortality rate ceased.

     

Rural GPs’ attitudes toward participating in emergency medicine: a qualitative study

Objective: Health authorities want to increase general practitioner (GP) participation in emergency medicine, but the role of the GP in this context controversial. We explored GPs’ attitudes toward emergency medicine and call outs.

Design: Thematic analysis of focus group interviews.

Setting: Four rural casualty clinics in Norway.

Participants: GPs with experience ranging from one to 32 years.

Results: The GPs felt that their role had changed from being the only provider of emergency care to being one of many. In particular, the emergency medical technician teams (EMT) have evolved and often manage well without a physician. Consequently, the GPs get less experience and feel more uncertain when encountering emergencies. Nevertheless, the GPs want to participate in call outs. They believed that their presence contributes to better patient care, and the community appreciates it. Taking part in call outs is seen as being vital to maintaining skills. The GPs had difficulties explaining how to decide whether to participate in call outs. Decisions were perceived as difficult due to insufficient information. The GPs assessed factors, such as distance from the patient and crowding at the casualty clinic, differently when discussing participation in call outs.

Conclusion: Although their role may have changed, GPs argue that they still play a part in emergency medicine. The GPs claim that by participating in call outs, they maintain their skills and improve patient care, but further research is needed to help policy makers and clinicians decide when the presence of a GP really counts.

Norwegian health authorities want to increase participation by general practitioners (GPs) in emergency medicine, but the role of the GP in this context is controversial.

• KEY POINTS

• The role of the GP has changed, but GPs argue that they still play an important role in emergency medicine.

• GPs believe that their presence on call outs improve patient care, but they find it defensible that patients are tended to by emergency medical technicians (EMTs) only.

• GPs offered different assessments regarding whether to participate in call outs in seemingly similar cases.

     

Patients’ ideas,concerns, expectations and satisfaction in primary health care – a questionnaire study of patients and health care professionals’ perspectives

Abstract

Objective: Explore the perceptions of patients and health care professionals about patients’ ideas, concerns, expectations (ICE), and satisfaction in consultations with general practitioners (GPs), district nurses (DNs) and physiotherapists (PTs).

Design: Cross-sectional questionnaire study of participants in planned consultations.

Setting: Five primary health care centers and two rehabilitation centers in Stockholm, Sweden.

Subjects: Pairs of patients and GPs (n?=?156), patients and DNs (n?=?73), and patients and PTs (n?=?69).

Main outcome measures: Multiple-choice questions about patients’ ICE and satisfaction.

Results: Approximately 75% of patients and GPs reported that patients’ thoughts and explanations about their symptoms emerged during the consultation. For patient-DN pairs, the figure was 60%, and for patient-PT pairs, 80%. A majority of patients reported not having concerns and anxiety about the investigation/treatment, whereas health care professionals thought patients were more concerned. One-third of patients consulting GPs and PTs expected to receive a reason/explanation for their symptoms. Figures were lower for the DNs. About 70% of patients were satisfied with the consultation.

Conclusions: Most patients expressed their ideas, a minority had concerns, and a minority expected an explanation of their illness. Patients and health care professionals rated patient satisfaction high, but health care professionals tended to believe patients were less satisfied than patients reported they were.

• Key points

• Patient surveys show that important aspects of patient-centeredness remain weak in Swedish primary health care; for example, shared decision-making.

• In this study of planned consultations, few patients expected to receive an explanation of their symptoms, but most were satisfied with the consultation.

• Health care professionals thought patients’ experiences were more negative than they were.

• This discrepancy was observed in responses to questions about patients’ concerns, expectations and satisfaction.

     

First four years of operation of a municipal acute bed unit in rural Norway

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the use of a small municipality acute bed unit (MAU) in rural Norway resulting from the Coordination reform regarding occupancy-rate, patient characteristics and healthcare provided during the first four years of operation. Further, to investigate whether implementation of the new municipal service avoided acute hospital admissions.

Design: Observational study.

Setting: A two-bed municipal acute bed unit.

Subjects: All patients admitted to the unit between 2013 and 2016.

Main outcome measures: Demographics, comorbidity, main diagnoses and level of municipal care on admission and discharge, diagnostic and therapeutic initiatives, MAU occupancy rate, and acute hospital admission rate.

Results: Altogether, 389 admissions occurred, 215 first-time admissions and 174 readmissions. The mean MAU bed occupancy rate doubled from of 0.26 in 2013 to 0.50 in 2016, while acute hospital admission rates declined. The patients (median age 84.0 years, 48.9% women at first time admission) were most commonly admitted for infections (28.0%), observation (22.1%) or musculoskeletal symptoms (16.2%). Some 52.7% of the patients admitted from home were discharged to a higher care level; musculoskeletal problems as admission diagnosis predicted this (RR =1.43, 95% CI 1.20–1.71, adjusted for age and sex).

Conclusion: Admission rates to MAU increased during the first years of operation. In the same period, there was a reduction in acute hospital admissions. Patient selection was largely in accordance with national and local criteria, including observational stays. Half the patients admitted from home were discharged to nursing home, suggesting that the unit was used as pathway to a higher municipal care level.

• Key Points

• Evaluation of the first four years of operation of a municipality acute bed unit (MAU) in rural Norway revealed:

• ??Admission rates to MAU increased, timely coinciding with decreased acute admission rates to hospital medical wards.

• ??Most patients were old and had complex health problems.

• ??Only half the patients were discharged back home; musculoskeletal symptoms were associated with discharge to a higher care level.

     

Urological symptoms among 23,240 men in the general danish population – concerns about symptoms,their persistence and influence on primary care contacts

Objective: To analyse possible associations between men’s likelihood of contacting a general practitioner (GP) for urological symptoms and the persistence of the symptoms, the influence on daily activities and the level of concern about the symptoms.

Design: Web-based nationwide cross-sectional questionnaire study.

Setting: The general population in Denmark.

Subjects: 48,910 randomly selected men aged 20+ years.

Main outcome measures: Urological symptom prevalence and odds ratios for GP contact with urological symptoms in regard to concern for the symptom, influence on daily activities and the persistence of the symptom.

Results: Some 23,240 men responded to the questionnaire, yielding a response rate of 49.8%. The prevalence of at least one urological symptom was 59.9%. Among men experiencing at least one urological symptom almost one-fourth reported contact to general practice regarding the symptom. Approximately half of the symptoms reported to be extremely concerning were discussed with a GP.

Conclusion: Increased symptom concern, influence on daily activities and long-term persistence increased the likelihood of contacting a GP with urological symptoms. This research points out that guidelines for PSA testing might be challenged by the high prevalence of urological symptoms.

• Key points

• ?The decision process of whether to contact the general practitioner (GP) is influenced by different factors, but contradictory results has been found in triggers and barriers for help-seeking with urological symptoms.

• ??Increased symptom concern, influence on daily activities and long-term persistence consistently increased the likelihood of contacting a general practitioner with urological symptoms in men.

• ??Only 50% of the symptoms reported to be extremely concerning were however discussed with the GP.

• ??Guidelines for PSA testing might be challenged by the high prevalence of urological symptoms.

     

Schizophrenia and attendance in primary healthcare: a population-based matched cohort study

Abstract

Objective: Schizophrenia is associated with high mortality, somatic comorbidity and reduced life expectancy. The general practitioner (GP) plays a key role in the treatment of mental and physical multimorbidity. Nevertheless, it is unclear how much individuals with schizophrenia use primary healthcare. This study aims to investigate the yearly numbers of consultations in general practice for individuals with schizophrenia.

Design and Setting: We performed a population-based matched cohort study of 21,757 individuals with schizophrenia and 435,140 age- and gender-matched references from Danish National Registers. Monthly general practice consultations were analysed using a generalized linear model with log link and assuming negative binomial distribution.

Main outcome measures: Consultation rates in general practice up to17 years after index diagnosis.

Results: Individuals with schizophrenia attended their GP more than references throughout the study period. The cases had 82% (95% CI: 78-87) and 76% (95% CI: 71-80) more consultations in primary care after 1 year and 5 years, respectively. Individuals with both schizophrenia and comorbid somatic illness attended even more.

Conclusion: Individuals with schizophrenia are in regular contact with their GP, especially if they have comorbid illnesses. Whether an average of six consultations per year for individuals with schizophrenia is sufficient is up for debate. The study demonstrates a potential for an increased prevention and treatment of individuals with schizophrenia in general practice.

• KEY POINTS

• Schizophrenia is associated with high mortality, somatic comorbidity and reduced life expectancy. Little is known about the attendance pattern in primary care for individuals with schizophrenia.

• ?We found high attendance rates in primary care for individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia from index diagnosis and at least 17 years after diagnosis, which suggests opportunities for earlier intervention to improve their somatic health.

• ?We found an association between high illness comorbidity and increased risk of not attending the general practitioner. The most severely somatically and mentally ill individuals may thus be difficult to reach and support in the current healthcare system.