Inappropriate prescribing in older residents of Australian care homes

What is known and objective: The incidence of inappropriate prescribing is higher amongst the older age group than the younger population. Inappropriate prescribing potentially leads to drug‐related problems such as adverse drug reactions. We aimed to determine the prevalence of inappropriate prescribing in residents of Tasmanian (Australia) residential care homes using Beers and McLeod criteria. Methods: Patient demographics, medical conditions and medications were collected from medical records. The patients who fulfilled either Beers or McLeod criteria were identified and the characteristics of these patients were then compared. Results: Data for 2345 residents were collected between 2006 and 2007. There were 1027 (43·8%) patients prescribed at least one inappropriate medication. Beers criteria identified more patients (828 patients, 35·3%) as being prescribed inappropriate medication compared with McLeod criteria (438 patients, 18·7%). Patients taking psychotropic medication/s, more than six medications or diagnosed with five or more medical conditions were more likely to be prescribed an inappropriate medication (P < 0·001). The most frequently identified inappropriate medications included benzodiazepines, amitriptyline, oxybutynin and non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs. What is new and conclusion: Inappropriate prescribing, as defined by either Beers criteria or McLeod criteria, is relatively common in Australian nursing homes. The prevalence of inappropriate prescribing, and factors influencing it, are consistent with other countries. Both Beers and McLeod criteria are a general guide to prescribing, and do not substitute for professional judgment.     

Inappropriate prescribing for the elderly: beers criteria-based review

OBJECTIVE: To review currently available literature applying the Beers criteria for inappropriate medication use in the elderly to prescribing practices in various settings. DATA SOURCE: Key words including inappropriate, Beers, medication, prescribing, elderly, geriatric, and criteria were used to search MEDLINE records from January 1992 to June 1999. DATA EXTRACTION: Eight relevant studies were found that applied the Beers criteria in various healthcare settings. DATA SYNTHESIS: Each study was examined for methodologic issues, criteria used, prevalence, nature and extent of inappropriate medication use, and factors associated with their use. Despite the methodologic differences, the review revealed some consistent patterns across healthcare settings. This review has shown that: (1) most of the researchers modified the Beers criteria to examine inappropriate medication use in the elderly; (2) studies using patient-based prevalence showed that between nearly one in four (23.5%) and one in seven (14.0%) elderly patients received an inappropriate medication as defined by either the Beers list of 20 inappropriate medications or the Modified Beers list; (3) the majority of these patients received one inappropriate agent; and (4) long-acting benzodiazepines, dipyridamole, propoxyphene, and amitriptyline were among the most frequently prescribed inappropriate medications. Univariate analyses indicated that women, patients >80 years old, and Medicaid patients appeared to receive more inappropriate medications than others; however, multivariate analyses found that only a higher number of medications was consistently associated with inappropriate medication use. CONCLUSIONS: Inappropriate prescribing or use trends are noteworthy because they were observed despite methodologic differences. The findings can be instrumental in developing targeted interventions to influence future prescribing practices. More research is needed to address the national trends and healthcare impact of inappropriate drug use in the elderly.     

Factors influencing the use of potentially inappropriate medication in older patients in Slovakia

Background: Although increasing attention has been given to the evaluation of use of potentially inappropriate medication in the older European Union (EU) member countries, information on this topic from Central and Eastern Europe is scarce. Objectives: The aims of the present study were: to identify risk factors enhancing the probability of use of potentially inappropriate medication in hospitalized older patients under the conditions of the Slovak healthcare system and to compare our results with previously published European studies. Methods: The evaluation was performed in 600 patients aged ≥65 years, hospitalized in a general hospital between 1 December 2003 and 31 March 2005. To identify the use of potentially inappropriate medication, the Beers 2003 criteria were applied. Particular socio‐demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as comorbid medical conditions were evaluated among possible factors enhancing the probability of use of potentially inappropriate medication. Results: At least one potentially inappropriate medication was prescribed to 126 (21%) of 600 patients. Multivariate analysis identified polypharmacy [odds ratio (OR) 2·38; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1·50–3·79], depression (OR 2·03; 95% CI: 1·08–3·82), immobilization (OR 1·87; 95% CI: 1·16–3·00) and heart failure (OR 1·73; 95% CI: 1·13–2·64) as factors associated with an increased risk of use of inappropriate medication. In contrast, patients aged ≥75 years had a lower risk of being prescribed potentially inappropriate medication (OR 0·58; 95% CI: 0·39–0·88). Conclusions: Polypharmacy, immobilization, heart failure and depression were documented as predictors of use of potentially inappropriate medication. In depressive patients, drugs other than antidepressants contributed to the extensive use of potentially inappropriate medication. The observed prevalence of use of potentially inappropriate medication in older hospitalized Slovak patients was lower than the prevalence previously documented in Poland and the Czech Republic, but higher than in Croatia and Turkey. The identified risk factors were consistent with previous findings from other parts of Europe.     

Patterns of potentially inappropriate medication use across three cohorts of older Medicaid recipients

BACKGROUND: Potentially inappropriate medication use is a serious quality concern, especially when it occurs in more vulnerable older adults or for extended durations. OBJECTIVE: To characterize patterns of inappropriate medication use and duration among 3 cohorts with differing health status. METHODS: We identified unconditionally inappropriate drug use, using Beers 1997 criteria, among 3185 older Kansas Medicaid beneficiaries. Claims from May 2000 to April 2001 provided data for 3 cohorts: nursing facility (NF) residents, recipients of home- and community-based services through the Frail Elderly (FE) program, and persons with neither NF/FE care (Ambulatory). Duration, categorized as short-term (< or = 1 month's supply), extended (> 1-9 mo), or chronic (> 9-12 mo), was determined for each drug and cohort. Drug-disease associations were explored. RESULTS: Any inappropriate medication use occurred in 21%, 48%, and 38% of Ambulatory, FE, and NF cohorts, respectively. Inappropriate analgesics, antihistamines, antidepressants, muscle relaxants, and oxybutynin were most common, but prevalence and duration varied by cohort. Short-term analgesic and antihistamine use was common. FE cohort members had the highest use rates for all drugs. The NF cohort had less antidepressant and muscle relaxant use. Drug-disease associations were noted for amitriptyline use in diabetes mellitus, propoxyphene use in musculoskeletal and upper gastrointestinal conditions, and muscle relaxant use in musculoskeletal conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Cross-sectional, one-year prevalence figures are comprised of both short- and long-term use that varies by drug and cohort. NF residence is associated with reduced use of drugs scrutinized during mandated medication review. Relevant diseases are associated with specific inappropriate prescribing. Future efforts should target extended and chronic duration of use and persons at highest risk for adverse effects, including recipients of home- and community-based care.     

Inappropriate drug use and risk of transition to nursing homes among community-dwelling older adults

BACKGROUND: Adverse events from inappropriate medications are preventable risk factors for nursing home admissions. OBJECTIVE: We sought to investigate the relationship between inappropriate medications in older adults and transitions to nursing home. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of Medicare beneficiaries with employer-sponsored supplemental health insurance was analyzed using a longitudinal data set of Medicare supplemental insurance claims. After a baseline year with no nursing home admissions, subjects were followed until the first month of transition to nursing home, loss to follow-up, or the end of the 24-month follow-up period. Survival analysis was used to compare the risk of nursing home transition among those with and without inappropriate drug use in the previous 3 months. RESULTS: Of the 487,383 subjects in the cohort, 22,042 (4.5%) had a nursing home admission. Use of inappropriate drugs was associated with a 31% increase in risk of nursing home admission, compared with no use of inappropriate drugs (adjusted relative risk 1.31, 99% confidence interval [CI] 1.26-1.36). Analyses of individual drug classes showed the risk of nursing home admission was similar, or lower, for inappropriate drugs versus other drugs of the same class. For example, the relative risk of nursing home admission was 2.34 (99% CI 2.20-2.47) for inappropriate narcotics and 2.68 (99% CI 2.55-2.82) for other narcotics, compared with no narcotic use. CONCLUSION: Inappropriate drug use was associated with increased risk of nursing home transition, but the increased risk may be explained by underlying patient conditions for which the drugs were prescribed rather than the inappropriate drug.     

Permanent transition of homecare recipients with dementia to nursing homes in New York State: Risk factors

This retrospective cohort study uses the Minimum Data Set (MDS) and Outcome and Assessment Information Set (OASIS) to determine predictors associated with permanent transition to nursing homes among home care recipients with dementia. Study participants include older adults age 65+ with dementia who received home health services in New York State for at least 2 months prior to permanent transition to nursing homes. Multivariate logistic regression was used to quantify the association between predictors and permanent transition to nursing homes. Risk factors associated with permanent transition included increasing age (OR = 1.1; 95% CI 1.03-1.18); white compared to black (OR = 1.25; 95%CI 0.83-0.94), urinary and bowel incontinence vs. continence (OR = 1.46; 95% CI 1.37-1.56); depression vs. no depression (OR = 1.2; 95% CI 1.11-1.25); hip fracture vs. no hip fracture (OR = 2.63; 95% CI 2.27-3.05), and 3+ hospitalizations vs. no hospitalizations (OR = 3.02; 95% CI 2.77-3.29). Early diagnosis and treatment may delay or avert nursing home entry.     

Which organizational characteristics are associated with increased management of depression using antidepressants in US nursing homes?

BACKGROUND: There is universal agreement that organizational characteristics of nursing facilities can and do influence the quality of care and resident outcomes. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the relation between organizational characteristics and management of depression using antidepressants. RESEARCH DESIGN: This was a cross-sectional study of Medicare/Medicaid certified nursing homes in 6 states in 2000. SUBJECTS: We studied 87,907 residents with depression in 2,128 facilities. MEASURES: Minimum Data Set (MDS) provided information regarding use of antidepressants and resident factors. On-line Survey and Certification of Automated Records (OSCAR) provided facility characteristics information including structural, resource, and staffing levels. Adjusted estimates of organizational effects on antidepressant drug use were derived from generalized estimating equations. RESULTS: Increased treatment of depression with antidepressants was associated with facilities with a higher percentage of residents from payer sources other than Medicare/Medicaid (odds ratio [OR], 1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.06) and more professional nursing staff (OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.05-1.26). Decreased treatment tended to be related to larger homes (OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.68-0.84) or if the home employed full-time physicians (OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.78-0.96). Once the decision to treat was made, treatment with tricyclics tended to be inversely related to larger homes, for-profit facilities, and homes with more Medicare residents. CONCLUSIONS: Facilities that are required to be more fiscally conservative, be it larger facilities with fewer private pay patients or for profit facilities, have lower rates of pharmacologic treatment. Resource and structural characteristics influence the type of antidepressant being prescribed; resident characteristics may not be the over-riding factor in prescribing.     

Polypharmacy in nursing home residents in the United States: Results of the 2004 National Nursing Home Survey

Background: Despite the need for and benefits of medications, polypharmacy (defined here as concurrent use of ≥9 medications) in nursing home residents is a concern. As the number of medications taken increases, so does the risk for adverse events. Monitoring polypharmacy in this population is important and can improve the quality of nursing home care.Objectives: The aims of this article were to estimate the use of polypharmacy in residents of nursing homes in the United States, to examine the associations between select resident and facility characteristics and polypharmacy, and to determine the leading therapeutic subclasses included in the polypharmacy received by these nursing home residents.Methods: This was a retrospective, cross-sectional study of a nationally representative sample of US nursing home residents in 2004; the outcome was use of polypharmacy. The 2004 National Nursing Home Survey was used to collect medication data and other resident and facility information. Resident characteristics included age, sex, race, primary payment source, number of comorbidities, number of activities of daily living (ADLs) for which the resident required assistance, and length of stay (LOS) since admission. Facility characteristics included ownership and size (number of beds).Results: Of 13,507 nursing home residents who received care, 13,403 had valid responses for all 9 independent variables in the analyses. The prevalence of polypharmacy among nursing home residents in 2004 was ~40%. A multiple regression model controlling for resident and facility factors revealed that the odds of receiving polypharmacy were higher for residents who were female (odds ratio [OR] = 1.10; 95% CI, 1.00–1.20), were white, had Medicaid as a primary payer, had >3 comorbidities (OR = 1.57–5.18; 95% CI, 1.36–6.15), needed assistance with <4 ADLs, had an LOS since admission of 3 to <6 months (OR = 1.25; 95% CI, 1.04–1.50), and received care in a small, not- for-profit facility (data not shown for reference levels [OR = 1.00]). The most frequently reported medications for residents who received polypharmacy included gastrointestinal agents (laxatives, 47.5%; agents for acid/peptic disorders, 43.3%), drugs that affect the central nervous system (antidepressants, 46.3%; antipsychotics or antimanics, 25.9%), and pain relievers (nonnarcotic analgesics, 43.6%; antipyretics, 41.2%; antiarthritics, 31.2%).Conclusions: Despite awareness of polypharmacy and its potential consequences in older patients, results of our analysis suggest that polypharmacy remains widespread in US nursing homes. Although complex medication regimens are often necessary for nursing home residents, monitoring polypharmacy and its consequences may improve the quality of nursing home care and reduce unnecessary health care spending related to adverse events.     

Concerns and beliefs about medicines and inappropriate medications: An internet-based survey on risk factors for self-reported adverse drug events among older adults

Background: Adverse drug events (ADEs), which can be especially problematic in older adults, often can be prevented by detecting potential risk factors. Sociopsychological factors such as concerns and beliefs about medicines (patients' anxieties about the harmful effects of prescribed medications) may also be risk factors related to self-reported ADEs, even when considering clinical variables such as receiving an inappropriate medication.Objectives: This study was designed to quantify the use of inappropriate medications among older adult outpatients and to determine whether an association exists between the use of inappropriate medications, concerns and beliefs about medicines, and self-reported ADEs.Methods: This cross-sectional, Internet-based survey of Medicare beneficiaries was conducted in 2007. Harris Interactive®, a New York-based marketing research firm, invited participants from their online panel who were ≥65 years of age, residents of the United States, and enrolled in the Medicare health plan to participate in the survey. The updated Beers criteria and a modified version of the Assessing Care of Vulnerable Elders quality indicators were used to determine the appropriateness of medications. Respondents' concerns about their medicines were assessed using items from a validated scale such as “Having to take medicines worries me” and “I sometimes worry about the long-term effects of my medicines.” To establish self-reported ADEs, respondents were asked, “Did you see a doctor about any side effects, unwanted reactions, or other problems from medicines you were taking in the past year?”Results: Of the 1024 panelists who responded to the survey, 874 provided all of the information required for analysis. The respondents who were included in the analyses ranged in age from 65 to 94 years; 56.6% were female, 94.4% were white, and 20.3% self-reported an ADE. The frequency of patients receiving either an inappropriate medication or a medication that failed a quality indicator was 45.8%. Stronger concerns and beliefs about medicines (odds ratio [OR] = 1.57; 95% CI, 1.02–2.39; P = 0.04) and having more symptoms (OR = 2.26; 95% CI, 1.22–4.22; P = 0.01) were significantly related to self-reporting of ADEs, whereas receiving an inappropriate medication (OR = 1.03; 95% CI, 0.65–1.64) and the number of medications received (OR = 1.28; 95% CI, 0.52–3.13) were not.Conclusions: Stronger concerns and beliefs about medicines and having more symptoms were significantly related to self-reporting of ADEs. Receiving an inappropriate medication and the number of medicines received were not significantly related.     

Potential adverse drug events in an indigent and homeless geriatric population.

OBJECTIVE: To identify potential adverse drug events (ADEs) in a geriatric ambulatory population using the modified Beers criteria. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study of an indigent and homeless geriatric population served by a network of six primary healthcare clinics with clinical pharmacy services. Medical records of patients > or = 65 years old visiting the clinics between December 1999 and April 2000 were retrospectively reviewed by a clinical pharmacist. Medications meeting the modfied Beers criteria were evaluated for the most common drug classes involved, severity potential, and dose or disease state restrictions. Following the identification of medications meeting Beers criteria, the pharmacist left a written recommendation regarding use of alternative drugs or doses in the medical record. Physician acceptance of pharmacy recommendations was also evaluated. RESULTS: Medical records of 146 patients (71.9% women, average age 72.6 +/- 6.7 y) were reviewed. Overall, 52 patients (35.6%) had 70 medications with the potential for causing an ADE based on the modified Beers criteria The most commonly identified medication classes were narcotic analgesics (20.0%), antihypertensives (20.0%), and antihistamines (14.3%). Fifteen of these medications (21.4%) had a high severity potential. Identified medications met the following modified Beers criteria: 41.4% were inappropriate in a specific disease state, 38.6% were inappropriate for the elderly, 10.0% exceeded maximum dosage guidelines, and 10.0% were inappropriate for both the elerly and the patients disease state. Approximately 60% of pharmacy recommendations were accepted by physicians. CONCLUSIONS: The modified Beers criteria are a useful tool for reviewing medical records to identify potential ADEs in an ambulatory geriatric population.