Pharmacodynamic analysis of ceftriaxone, gatifloxacin,and levofloxacin against Streptococcus pneumoniae with the use of Monte Carlo simulation

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the pharmacodynamics of four intravenous antimicrobial regimens-ceftriaxone 1 g, gatifloxacin 400 mg, levofloxacin 500 mg, and levofloxacin 750 mg, each every 24 hours-against recent Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates. DESIGN: Pharmacodynamic analysis using Monte Carlo simulation. DATA SOURCE: The Surveillance Network (TSN) 2002 database. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates (7866 isolates) were stratified according to penicillin susceptibilities as follows: susceptible (4593), intermediate (1986), and resistant (1287). Risk analysis software was used to simulate 10,000 patients by integrating published pharmacokinetic parameters, their variability, and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) distributions from the TSN database. Probability of target attainment was determined for percentage of time above the MIC (%T > MIC) from 0-100% for ceftriaxone and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC):MIC ratio from 0-150 for the fluoroquinolones. For ceftriaxone, probability of target attainment remained 90% or greater against the three isolate groups until a %T > MIC of 70% or greater, and it remained 90% or greater against susceptible and intermediate isolates over the entire interval (%T > MIC 0-100%). For levofloxacin 500 mg, probability of target attainment was 90% at an AUC:MIC < or = 30, but the curve declined sharply with further increases in pharmacodynamic target. Levofloxacin 750 mg achieved a probability of target attainment of 99% at an AUC:MIC ratio < or = 30; the probability remained approximately 90% until a target of 70 or greater, when it declined steeply. Gatifloxacin demonstrated a high probability (99%) of target attainment at an AUC:MIC ratio < or = 30, and it remained above 90% until a target of 70. CONCLUSION: Ceftriaxone maintained high probability of target attainment over a broad range of pharmacodynamic targets regardless of penicillin susceptibility (%T > MIC 0-60%). Levofloxacin 500 mg maintained high probability of target attainment for AUC:MIC ratios 0-30; whereas, levofloxacin 750 mg and gatifloxacin maintained high probability of target attainment for AUC:MIC ratios 0-60. Rate of decline in the pharmacodynamic curve was most pronounced for the two levofloxacin regimens and more gradual for gatifloxacin and ceftriaxone.     

A critical review of the fluoroquinolones: focus on respiratory infections.

The new fluoroquinolones (clinafloxacin, gatifloxacin, gemifloxacin, grepafloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, sitafloxacin, sparfloxacin and trovafloxacin) offer excellent activity against Gram-negative bacilli and improved Gram-positive activity (e.g. against Streptococcus pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus) over ciprofloxacin. Ciprofloxacin still maintains the best in vitro activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Clinafloxacin, gatifloxacin, moxifloxacin, sitafloxacin, sparfloxacin and trovafloxacin display improved activity against anaerobes (e.g. Bacteroides fragilis) versus ciprofloxacin. All of the new fluoroquinolones display excellent bioavailability and have longer serum half-lives than ciprofloxacin allowing for once daily dose administration. Clinical trials comparing the new fluoroquinolones to each other or to standard therapy have demonstrated good efficacy in a variety of community-acquired respiratory infections (e.g. pneumonia, acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis and acute sinusitis). Limited data suggest that the new fluoroquinolones as a class may lead to better outcomes in community-acquired pneumonia and acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis versus comparators. Several of these agents have either been withdrawn from the market, had their use severely restricted because of adverse effects (clinafloxacin because of phototoxicity and hypoglycaemia; grepafloxacin because of prolongation of the QTc and resultant torsades de pointes; sparfloxacin because of phototoxicity; and trovafloxacin because of hepatotoxicity), or were discontinued during developmental phases. The remaining fluoroquinolones such as gatifloxacin, gemifloxacin, levofloxacin and moxifloxacin have adverse effect profiles similar to ciprofloxacin. Extensive post-marketing safety surveillance data (as are available with ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin) are required for all new fluoroquinolones before safety can be definitively established. Drug interactions are limited; however, all fluoroquinolones interact with metal ion containing drugs (eg. antacids). The new fluoroquinolones (gatifloxacin, gemifloxacin, levofloxacin and moxifloxacin) offer several advantages over ciprofloxacin and are emerging as important therapeutic agents in the treatment of community-acquired respiratory infections. Their broad spectrum of activity which includes respiratory pathogens such as penicillin and macrolide resistant S. pneumoniae, favourable pharmacokinetic parameters, good bacteriological and clinical efficacy will lead to growing use of these agents in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia, acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis and acute sinusitis. These agents may result in cost savings especially in situations where, because of their potent broad-spectrum activity and excellent bioavailability, they may be used orally in place of intravenous antibacterials. Prudent use of the new fluoroquinolones will be required to minimise the development of resistance to these agents.     

Evaluation of survival and pharmacodynamic relationships for five fluoroquinolones in a neutropenic murine model of pneumococcal lung infection

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the antistreptococcal activity of five fluoroquinolone antibiotics, using a neutropenic murine model of pneumococcal pulmonary infection. DESIGN: Animal experiment. SETTING: University-affiliated research center. ANIMALS: Neutropenic and control mice weighing 24-29 g. INTERVENTION: After induction of neutropenia, renal failure, and infection with Streptococcus pneumoniae, the mice received one of five fluoroquinolones twice/day for 72 hours beginning 12 hours after infection. Dosages were selected to approximate 0.1 x AUC0-24 (area under the concentration-time curve from 0-24 hours) and AUC0-24 achieved in humans. Control mice received normal saline. Survival was assessed at regular intervals for up to 10 days. At least 10 mice were included in each cohort (range 10-34). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Ciprofloxacin, clinafloxacin, grepafloxacin, levofloxacin, and moxifloxacin were studied at subtherapeutic and therapeutic dosages against three quinolone-susceptible isolates of S. pneumoniae that lacked mutations in parC, parE, and gyrA. Pharmacokinetic profile of each agent and dosing regimen was determined. A composite survival curve for all fluoroquinolones and isolates was constructed. Relationships between survival rate at 72 hours and AUC:MIC (minimum inhibitory concentration), peak:MIC, time above the MIC (percentage of dosing interval) for total and free drug concentrations were fit by using a sigmoid maximal effect (Emax) model. Survival was significantly better in the higher dosage group than in the lower dosage group. Time above MIC did not display a correlation with outcome. The AUC:MIC showed a greater correlation with outcome (R2 = 0.56 total, 0.54 free) than did peak:MIC (R2 = 0.52 total, 0.51 free). With use of composite data, total AUC:MIC ratios associated with 50%, 90%, and 99% of Emax were 34:1, 56:1, and 95:1, respectively CONCLUSIONS: In this model, efficacy was achieved with the fluoroquinolone antibiotics at dosages yielding AUC0-24 comparable to those obtained in humans. One pharmacodynamic parameter (i.e., AUC:MIC) may be applied to various fluoroquinolones and isolates of S. pneumoniae. The AUC:MIC was more predictive of outcome than was time above the MIC or peak:MIC.     

Comparison of gatifloxacin and levofloxacin administered at various dosing regimens to hospitalised patients with community-acquired pneumonia: pharmacodynamic target attainment study using North American surveillance data for Streptococcus pneumoniae

This work aimed at determining the target attainment potential of gatifloxacin and levofloxacin in specific age-related patient populations such as elderly (> or =65 years) versus younger (<65 years) hospitalised patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Previously described population pharmacokinetic models of gatifloxacin and levofloxacin administration in patients with serious CAP were utilised to simulate gatifloxacin and levofloxacin pharmacokinetics. Pharmacokinetic simulations and susceptibility data for Streptococcus pneumoniae from the ongoing national surveillance study, Canadian Respiratory Organism Susceptibility Study (CROSS), were then used to produce pharmacodynamic indices of free-drug area under the curve over 24h relative to the minimum inhibitory concentration (free-drug AUC(0-24)/MIC(all)). Monte Carlo simulations were then used to analyse target attainment both of gatifloxacin and levofloxacin to achieve free-drug AUC(0-24)/MIC(all)> or =30 against S. pneumoniae in patients with CAP. Dosing regimens for gatifloxacin were 400 mg once daily (qd) administered to younger patients (<65 years) and gatifloxacin 200 mg qd to elderly patients (> or =65 years). Dosing regimens for levofloxacin were simulated as 500 mg, 750 mg and 1000 mg qd administered to elderly patients as well as younger patients. Monte Carlo simulations using gatifloxacin 400mg against S. pneumoniae yielded probabilities of achieving free-drug AUC(0-24)/MIC(all) of 30 of 96.6% for all patients, 92.3% for younger patients and 97.7% for elderly patients. When administered to elderly patients, a reduced dose of gatifloxacin 200mg qd could achieve a target attainment potential of 91.4%. Monte Carlo simulation using levofloxacin 500 mg qd yielded probabilities of achieving free-drug AUC(0-24)/MIC(all) of 30 of 92.3% for all patients, 95.7% for elderly patients compared with 72.7% for younger patients. Using levofloxacin 750 mg and 1000 mg qd had probabilities of achieving free-drug AUC(0-24)/MIC(all) of 30 of 97.0% and 98.3%, 98.1% and 99.2%, and 90.1% and 95.2% for all patients, elderly patients and younger patients, respectively. The probability of achieving free-drug AUC(0-24)/MIC(all) of 100 was low both with gatifloxacin and levofloxacin, except in the case of elderly patients receiving levofloxacin in a dose of 1000 mg qd (78.5%). We conclude that gatifloxacin and levofloxacin pharmacokinetics in elderly patients with CAP are markedly different from those of younger patients. Higher gatifloxacin/levofloxacin AUC and longer half-life (t(1/2)) values in elderly patients with CAP compared with younger patients provide better pharmacodynamic parameters (free-drug AUC(0-24)/MIC) leading to a higher probability of pharmacodynamic target attainment and improved bacteriological outcome against S. pneumoniae. Gatifloxacin 400mg qd results in a high probability of target attainment and improved bacteriological outcome against S. pneumoniae both in young and elderly CAP patients. However, gatifloxacin administered at a lowered dose of 200 mg qd in elderly patients could still be successful in producing a favourable antibacterial effect. Levofloxacin administered at a dose of 750 mg qd results in a high probability of target attainment and improved bacteriological outcome against S. pneumoniae in all patients with CAP.     

Guide to selection of fluoroquinolones in patients with lower respiratory tract infections

Newer fluoroquinolones such as levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, gatifloxacin and gemifloxacin have several attributes that make them excellent choices for the therapy of lower respiratory tract infections. In particular, they have excellent intrinsic activity against Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis and the atypical respiratory pathogens. Fluoroquinolones may be used as monotherapy to treat high-risk patients with acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis, and for patients with community-acquired pneumonia requiring hospitalisation, but not admission to intensive care. Overall, the newer fluoroquinolones often achieve clinical cure rates in > or =90% of these patients. However, rates may be lower in hospital-acquired pneumonia, and this infection should be treated on the basis of anticipated organisms and evaluation of risk factors for specific pathogens such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa. In this setting, an antipseudomonal fluoroquinolone may be used in combination with an antipseudomonalbeta-lactam.Concerns are now being raised about the widespread use, and possibly misuse, of fluoroquinolones and the emergence of resistance among S. pneumoniae, Enterobacteriaceae and P. aeruginosa. A number of pharmacokinetic parameters such as the peak concentration of the antibacterial after a dose (C(max)), and the 24-hour area under the concentration-time curve (AUC24) and their relationship to pharmacodynamic parameters such as the minimum inhibitory and the mutant prevention concentrations (MIC and MPC, respectively) have been proposed to predict the effect of fluoroquinolones on bacterial killing and the emergence of resistance. Higher C(max)/MIC or AUC24/MIC and C(max)/MPC or AUC24/MPC ratios, either as a result of dose administration or the susceptibility of the organism, may lead to a better clinical outcome and decrease the emergence of resistance, respectively. Pharmacokinetic profiles that are optimised to target low-level resistant minor subpopulations of bacteria that often exist in infections may help preserve fluoroquinolones as a class. To this end, optimising the AUC24/MPC or C(max)/MPC ratios is important, particularly against S. pneumoniae, in the setting of lower respiratory tract infections. Agents such as moxifloxacin and gemifloxacin with high ratios against this organism are preferred, and agents such as ciprofloxacin with low ratios should be avoided. For agents such as levofloxacin and gatifloxacin, with intermediate ratios against S. pneumoniae, it may be worthwhile considering alternative dose administration strategies, such as using higher dosages, to eradicate low-level resistant variants. This must, of course, be balanced against the potential of toxicity. Innovative approaches to the use of fluoroquinolones are worth testing in further in vitro experiments as well as in clinical trials.     

Urinary concentrations and bactericidal activities of newer fluoroquinolones in healthy volunteers

Eleven healthy male subjects participated in a crossover study to compare the urine concentrations and bactericidal activities of newer fluoroquinolones against common uropathogens. Each volunteer received a single oral dose of gatifloxacin (400 mg), levofloxacin (250 mg), moxifloxacin (400 mg) and trovafloxacin (200 mg), and a urine sample was obtained at 2, 6, 12 and 24 h after the dose. Urine concentrations were highest with gatifloxacin and levofloxacin and lowest with trovafloxacin. Each drug concentration was studied against a levofloxacin susceptible and moderately-susceptible strain of Escherichia coli (minimal inhibitory concentration, MICs: 0.125 and 4 mg/l), K. pneumoniae (MICs: 0.125 and 4 mg/l), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MICs: 0.5 and 4 mg/l) and Enterococcus faecalis (MICs: 0.25 and 4 mg/l). The duration of urine bactericidal activity (UBA) was based upon the median bactericidal titre at each time period. Both gatifloxacin and levofloxacin exhibited prolonged (> or = 6 h) UBA against all of the study isolates. Moxifloxacin exhibited prolonged UBA against both isolates of E. coli, K. pneumoniae and E. faecalis but not against either strain of P. aeruginosa. Prolonged UBA was not observed for trovafloxacin against the moderately-susceptible strains with the exception of E. faecalis. Furthermore, UBA was not observed for trovafloxacin against the susceptible strain of P. aeruginosa. Although these newer fluoroquinolones exhibited similar in vitro activity against these uropathogens, only those compounds with the highest urinary concentrations (gatifloxacin and levofloxacin) produced prolonged UBA against both strains of P. aeruginosa. The findings from this study suggest that both microbiological activity and urinary concentrations are important parameters to consider when choosing a fluoroquinolone for empirical treatment of urinary tract infections (UTIs).     

In vitro susceptibility of 4903 bacterial isolates to gemifloxacin--an advanced fluoroquinolone

The in vitro activity of gemifloxacin against over 4900 bacterial isolates was determined by microbroth dilution with interpretation in accordance with NCCLS guidelines. Susceptibility results were compared with those for ciprofloxacin, gatifloxacin, levofloxacin and moxifloxacin. Gemifloxacin and the other fluoroquinolones were not affected by either beta-lactamase production or penicillin-resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae. The MIC90 values for gemifloxacin were: S. pneumoniae 0.063 mg/l; Haemophilus influenzae 0.016 mg/l; Moraxella catarrhalis 0.008 mg/l, methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus 0.063 mg/l; methicillin-susceptible Streptococcus pyogenes 0.031 mg/l; Enterobacteriaceae 0.031-0.16 mg/l; Pseudomonas aeruginosa 4 mg/l; Neisseria meningitidis 0.008 mg/l. The MIC90 for gemifloxacin was lower than those for the other quinolones tested against S. pneumoniae (ciprofloxacin 2-4 mg/l, gatifloxacin 0.5 mg/l, levofloxacin 1-2 mg/l, moxifloxacin 0.25 mg/l). This study confirms the enhanced potent activity of gemifloxacin against Gram-positive pathogens, its broad-spectrum, Gram-negative activity and indicates that gemifloxacin is likely to have an important role in treating patients with Gram-positive and/or Gram-negative infections.     

In vitro activity of four fluoroquinolones against clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa determined by the E test

Ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, ofloxacin, and trovafloxacin were tested by the E-test against 100 clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Ciprofloxacin was the most active of the tested agents with 82% of isolates having a MIC 8). Levofloxacin and trovafloxacin had nearly identical potency: 75% and 76% of the isolates were inhibited by 8 for levofloxacin; 0.19->8 for trovafloxacin). Ofloxacin was the least active of the four quinolones, with 43% of the isolates having a MIC >2 mg/l. All isolates resistant to ciprofloxacin were also resistant to the other agents, i.e. resistance to ciprofloxacin predicted resistance to all the quinolones tested in every case. This data demonstrates that fluoroquinolones are active agents against P. aeruginosa. In vitro susceptibility testing, however, is crucial to assess the resistance pattern in any specific location and for each individual agent.     

Intrapulmonary pharmacodynamics of high-dose levofloxacin in subjects with chronic bronchitis or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

The objective of this study was to determine the plasma and intrapulmonary pharmacokinetic parameters of intravenously administered levofloxacin in subjects with stable chronic lung disease. Three doses of 1000 mg levofloxacin were administered once daily to 16 adult subjects divided into four groups of 4 subjects each. Standardised bronchoscopy and timed bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) were performed at 4 h, 8 h, 12 h and 24 h following administration of the last dose. Blood was obtained for drug assay prior to drug administration, at the end of the last infusion (maximum concentration (Cmax)) and at the time of BAL. Levofloxacin was measured using a high-performance liquid chromatographic tandem mass spectrometric (HPLC/MS/MS) technique. Plasma, epithelial lining fluid (ELF) and alveolar cell (AC) pharmacokinetics were derived using non-compartmental methods. Cmax/MIC(90) and area under the concentration-time curve for 0-24 h after the last dose (AUC(0-24 h)/MIC(90) ratios were calculated for respiratory pathogens with minimum inhibitory concentrations for 90% of the organisms (MIC(90)) of 0.03-2 microg/mL. The Cmax (mean+/-standard deviation), AUC(0-24h) and half-life were, respectively, 9.2+/-2.7 microg/mL, 130 microg h/mL and 8.7 h for plasma, 22.8+/-12.9 microg/mL, 260 microg h/mL and 7.0 h for ELF and 76.3+/-28.7 microg/mL, 1492 microg h/mL and 49.5 h for ACs. Levofloxacin concentrations were quantitatively greater in ACs than in ELF or plasma at all time points, however only the differences between AC concentration and ELF or plasma concentrations in the 4-h and 8-h time groups were statistically significant. Cmax/MIC(90) and AUC/MIC(90) ratios in ELF were, respectively, 11.4 and 130 for Mycoplasma pneumoniae, 22.8 and 260 for Streptococcus pneumoniae, 91.2 and 1040 for Chlamydia pneumoniae and 760 and 8667 for Haemophilus influenzae. In ACs the ratios were 38.2 and 746 for M. pneumoniae, 76.3 and 1492 for S. pneumoniae, 305 and 5968 for C. pneumoniae and 2543 and 49 733 for H. influenzae. In conclusion, Cmax/MIC(90) and AUC/MIC(90) ratios provide a pharmacokinetic rationale for once-daily administration of a 1000 mg dose of levofloxacin and are favourable for the treatment of respiratory infection in patients with chronic lung disease.     

6种氟喹诺酮类药物对凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌的防耐药变异浓度分析

目的 比较6种氟喹诺酮类药物对临床分离凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌耐药突变体的选择能力.方法 选择呼吸道标本,对苯唑西林、环丙沙星敏感的凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌34株,采用标准琼脂二倍稀释法、标准琼脂平板稀释法,测定6种氟喹诺酮类药物对凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)、防耐药变异浓度(MPC).结果 MPC值比较,莫西沙星最低(MPC90为1 mg/L),左氧氟沙星和环丙沙星最高(MPC90均为32 mg/L).莫西沙星、卡屈沙星和加替沙星的MPC90/MIC90较低,均为2.结论 莫西沙星、卡屈沙星和加替沙星对凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌的MPC值较低,突变选择窗范围相对较窄.     

六种氟喹诺酮对肠球菌的体外抗菌活性及利血平的影响

目的：研究氟喹诺酮类抗菌药物对临床分离肠球菌的体外抗菌活性,以及多重耐药泵抑制剂利血平对抗菌活性的影响.方法：收集临床分离的101株肠球菌（66株粪肠球菌和35株屎肠球菌）,用琼脂稀释法测定应用利血平前后6种氟喹诺酮对菌株的最低抑菌浓度（MIC）.结果：诺氟沙星、环丙沙星、氧氟沙星、左氧氟沙星、加替沙星、莫西沙星对66株粪肠球菌的MIC90依次为256、64、64、16、16、8 mg/L,对35株屎肠球菌的MIC90依次为＞512、512、128、128、32、32 mg/L.应用利血平之后,上述6种药物对粪肠球菌抗菌活性提高（MIC下降2倍或2倍以上）的株数依次为66（100%）、54（81.8%）、4（6.1%）、4（6.1%）、32（48.5%）和3（4.5%）株,对屎肠球菌抗菌活性提高的株数依次为35（100%）、29（82.9%）、1（2.9%）、0（0%）、6（20.7%）和2（5.7%）株.结论：新氟喹诺酮加替沙星、莫西沙星增强了对肠球菌的抗菌活性,利血平能够提高全部或部分被检测肠球菌对诺氟沙星、环丙沙星和加替沙星的敏感性,但仅使少数被检测肠球菌对氧氟沙星、左氧氟沙星和莫西沙星的敏感性提高.     

In vitro activity of gatifloxacin compared with gemifloxacin, moxifloxacin, trovafloxacin, ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin against uropathogens cultured from patients with complicated urinary tract infections

Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of gatifloxacin were compared with those of gemifloxacin, moxifloxacin, trovafloxacin, ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin using an agar dilution method for 400 uropathogens cultured from the urine of urological patients with complicated and/or hospital-acquired urinary tract infections (UTI). The collection of strains was made up of Enterobacteriaceae (34.5%), enterococci (31.5%), staphylococci (21.2%) and non-fermenting bacteria (12.8%). The antibacterial activity of the three newer fluoroquinolones, gatifloxacin, gemifloxacin, and moxifloxacin, were similar, but showed some drug specific differences. Gemifloxacin was most active against Escherichia coli, but less so against Proteus mirabilis. In this series all isolates of E. coli were inhibited at a MIC of 0.25 mg/l gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin and by 0.125 mg/l gemifloxacin. The MIC distribution of all fluoroquinolones showed a bimodal distribution for staphylococci, enterococci and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The two modes for P. aeruginosa were 1 and 64 mg/l for gemifloxacin and moxifloxacin and 0.5 and 64 mg/l for gatifloxacin. For staphylococci the two modes were 0.125 and 2 mg/l for gatifloxacin, 0.03 and 4 mg/l for gemifloxacin, and 0.03 and 2 mg/l for moxifloxacin; for enterococci, 0.25 and 16 mg/l for gatifloxacin, 0.06 and 2 mg/l for gemifloxacin, and 0.25 and 8 mg/l for moxifloxacin. Compared with trovafloxacin the MICs were similar, but the newer fluoroquinolones were more active than ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin against Gram-positive bacteria. Of the newer fluoroquinolones gatifloxacin had the highest rate of renal excretion and could be considered a promising alternative fluoroquinolone agent for the treatment of UTI.     

Comparative in vitro activity of gemifloxacin to other fluoroquinolones and non-quinolone agents against Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis in the United States in 1999-2000

This study was undertaken to assess the in vitro activity of gemifloxacin, five other fluoroquinolone antimicrobial agents (ciprofloxacin, gatifloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin and ofloxacin) and other non-quinolone comparator agents (ampicillin, erythromycin, clindamycin, doxycycline, penicillin and trimethoprim/sulphamethoxazole) against Streptococcus pneumoniae collected in the United States. Susceptibility testing of 550 S. pneumoniae, 290 Haemophilus influenzae and 205 Moraxella catarrhalis showed that 38.2% of pneumococci were penicillin nonsusceptible, while 26.2 and 95.6% of H. influenzae and M. catarrhalis, respectively, produced beta-lactamase. Overall new fluoroquinolones were the most active agents. The in vitro activity (based on MIC90 in mg/l) of the six fluoroquinolones was gemifloxacin>moxifloxacin>gatifloxacin>levofloxacin>ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin.     

Influence of diminished susceptibility of Streptococcus pneumoniae to ciprofloxacin on the serum bactericidal activity of gemifloxacin and trovafloxacin after a single dose in healthy volunteers

The serum bactericidal activity against 2 Streptococcus pneumoniae strains (ciprofloxacin MIC 1 and 4 mg/l) was measured in 12 volunteers who received oral single doses of gemifloxacin 320 mg and trovafloxacin 200 mg in a crossover fashion. The 4-fold increase in ciprofloxacin MIC from the susceptible to the resistant strain resulted in a 2-fold increase in MIC (from 0.015 to 0.03 mg/l), a 2-fold decrease in C(max)/MIC (104 vs 52) and in AUC(0-24 h)/MIC (532 vs 266), but a 5.6-fold decrease in area under the bactericidal curve (AUBC: 168 vs 30) for gemifloxacin. Trovafloxacin showed a 4-fold higher MIC (0.25 vs 0.06 mg/l), a 4-fold lower C(max)/MIC (8.6 vs 36), a 4-fold lower AUC(0-24 h)/MIC (85 vs 356) and a 11-fold lower AUBCs (2 vs 22) against the resistant isolate compared with the susceptible one. Trovafloxacin serum bactericidal titres against the ciprofloxacin-resistant strain were measurable generally only at 1 h after dosing (median titre=2). Gemifloxacin showed similar ex vivo bactericidal activity against the ciprofloxacin-resistant strain to that of trovafloxacin against the ciprofloxacin-susceptible strain.     

In vitro activity of linezolid,synercid and telithromycin against genetically defined high level fluoroquinolone-resistant methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

The in vitro activity of levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, gatifloxacin, erythromycin, telithromycin, linezolid, synercid and vancomycin was measured against 36 genetically defined, gyrA/grlA double mutant MRSA clinical strains with an MIC to ciprofloxacin > or = 8 mg/l. The three newer fluoroquinolones tested were more active than ciprofloxacin. Resistance rates for levofloxacin and gatifloxacin were high (44.5 and 36.1%, respectively). All the strains were moxifloxacin-susceptible, though most of them had MICs close to the break point. All the strains were intermediate or resistant to erythromycin and most were also resistant to telithromycin. No strains were resistant to linezolid, synercid or vancomycin (MIC(90): 2, 1 and 2 mg/l, respectively).     

Antibacterial activity of tosufloxacin against major organisms detected from patients with respiratory infections

We determined the susceptibility of bacteria which were isolated from the patients with respiratory infections between January and October 2005, to tosufloxacin and other fluoroquinolones. A total of 900 isolate including 300 Streptococcus pneumoniae, 100 Streptococcus pyogenes, 100 Moraxella catarrhalis, 200 Haemophilus influenzae, 100 Klebsiella pneumoniae and 100 Pseudomonas aeruginosa were tested. Tosufloxacin, gatifloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, ciprofloxacin and prulifloxacin were used as the test antimicrobials. Tosufloxacin, gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin were potent antibiotics tested for the antibacterial activity against Streptococcus including penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae; the MIC90 were 0.12-0.5/ micromL. Fluoroquinolones exerted the potent antibacterial activity against M. catarrhalis and H. influenzae; the MIC90 of fluoroquinolones tested were < or =0.06 microg/mL. Tosufloxacin, ciprofloxacin and prulifloxacin showed to be more active against K. pneumoniae and P. aeruginosa, but parts of some strains were resistant. These results indicate that tosufloxacin has the potent antibacterial activity against major organisms detected from patients with respiratory infections. Since it was approved in 1990, tosufloxacin was considered to be useful as a therapeutic antimicrobial for the treatment of respiratory infections.     

Pharmacodynamic target attainment analysis against Streptococcus pneumoniae using levofloxacin 500 mg, 750 mg and 1000 mg once daily in plasma (P) and epithelial lining fluid (ELF) of hospitalized patients with community acquired pneumonia (CAP)

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of levofloxacin in patients with respiratory infections such as community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) are poorly documented. This work aimed at assessing the pharmacodynamic target attainment against Streptococcus pneumoniae using levofloxacin 500 mg, 750 mg and 1000 mg administered once daily in plasma (P) and epithelial lining fluid (ELF) of hospitalized patients with community acquired pneumonia. The pharmacokinetics of levofloxacin in elderly (>/=65 years) compared with younger patients (<65 years) hospitalized with CAP were simulated. Susceptibility data with S. pneumoniae from our ongoing national surveillance study (Canadian Respiratory Organism Susceptibility Study-CROSS) were then used to produce pharmacodynamic indices of AUC(0-24)/MIC(all.) Monte Carlo simulations were then used to analyse target attainment of levofloxacin using doses of 500 mg, 750 mg and 1000 mg once daily to achieve free drug AUC(0-24)/MIC(all) >/= 30-100 versus S. pneumoniae in patients with CAP. Pharmacokinetics of levofloxacin simulated after 500 mg, 750 mg and 1000 mg once daily dosing resulted in levofloxacin volume of distribution: elderly patients = younger patients, while levofloxacin clearance was: elderly patients < younger patients. Levofloxacin t(1/2) values were longer in elderly patients (9.8 +/- 2.5h) than younger patients with CAP (7.4 +/- 2.5h). Free levofloxacin AUC(0-24) as well as AUC(0-24)/MIC(all) for S. pneumoniae were higher in elderly patients than younger patients. Monte Carlo simulation using levofloxacin 500 mg yielded probabilities of achieving free-drug AUC(0-24)/MIC(all) of 30 in P and ELF (95.7% and 98.1%) in elderly and younger patients (72.7% and 80.6%) respectively. Levofloxacin 750 mg and 1000 mg once daily had probability of achieving free-drug AUC(0-24)/MIC(all) of 30 in P/ELF of 98.1%/98.6% and 99.2%/99.0%, respectively, in elderly patients compared with 89.9%/94.1% and 95.2%/96.5%, respectively, for younger patients. Probability of achieving of AUC(0-24)/MIC(all) of 100 in P or ELF was very low in both patient populations at different doses except in the case of elderly patients receiving levofloxacin in a dose of 1000 mg once daily P/ELF of 78.5%/87.0%. We conclude that levofloxacin pharmacokinetics in elderly patients with CAP are markedly different from those of younger patients. Levofloxacin 750 mg OD provides high probabilities of achieving free-drug AUC(0-24)/MIC(all) of 30 in both plasma and epithelial lining fluid in patients with CAP including younger patients. Levofloxacin 500 mg OD provides high probabilities of achieving free-drug AUC(0-24)/MIC(all) of 30 in elderly patients with CAP, although we favour the 750 mg dosing in these patients as well. Levofloxacin 750 mg OD results in high probability of pharmacodynamic target attainment and improved bacteriological outcome against S. pneumoniae in patients with CAP.     

In vivo activity of gemifloxacin, moxifloxacin and levofloxacin against pneumococci with gyrA and parC point mutations in a sepsis mouse model measured with the all or nothing mortality end-point

A dose-decreasing immunocompetent sepsis mouse model was used to evaluate the in vivo effect of levofloxacin, moxifloxacin and gemifloxacin, using a ciprofloxacin/levofloxacin susceptible serotype 6B strain (ciprofloxacin MIC: 1 mg/l) and two resistant serotype 14 and 19F strains with gyrA and parC point mutations (ciprofloxacin MICs of 32 and 64 mg/l, respectively). Significant higher in vivo activity was found for moxifloxacin and gemifloxacin than for levofloxacin against strains 1 and 2, and for gemifloxacin versus moxifloxacin or levofloxacin against strain 3. Gemifloxacin treatment resulted in 100% survival against strains 1 and 2(AUC0-24 h/MIC of 30 and 62) but against strain 3, survival was 60-80% (AUC0-24 h/MIC of 93). Similar AUC0-24 h/MIC values produced different therapeutic results suggesting that in vitro parameters other than the MIC could influence efficacy predictions based on in vitro susceptibility tests (MICs) or pharmacodynamic parameters (AUC0-24 h/MIC).     

Lack of interaction between levofloxacin and oxycodone: pharmacokinetics and drug disposition

Previous studies have demonstrated a significant reduction in the oral bioavailability of trovafloxacin and ciprofloxacin when administered concomitantly with an intravenous opiate such as morphine. This decrease in absorption results in a 36% and 50% lower AUC for trovafloxacin and ciprofloxacin, respectively, which could cause clinical failures. The authors investigated the possibility of a similar interaction between oxycodone and levofloxacin. Eight healthy volunteers were randomized in an open-label, two-way crossover study to receive oxycodone, 5 mg p.o. Q4H, and levofloxacin, 500 mg p.o. 1 hour after starting the oxycodone or levofloxacin 500 mg p.o. alone. Blood samples were drawn at 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, and 24 hours for Cmax, tmax, and AUC determinations. There was not a significant difference (p > 0.05) in AUC (48.59 +/- 8.52 vs. 49.9 +/- 9.93), Cmax (7.73 +/- 2.6 vs. 6.6 +/- 2.0), and tmax (1.1 +/- 0.6 vs. 1.6 +/- 1.1) for levofloxacin versus levofloxacin/oxycodone regimens. It was concluded that oral oxycodone and levofloxacin can be administered concomitantly without a significant decrease in AUC, Cmax, or tmax.