Current use of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts

The principal indication for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) continues to be rescue therapy for variceal hemorrhage that cannot be controlled by endoscopic or medical therapy. TIPS provide no survival advantage in prevention of rebleeding or refractory ascites. The indications for TIPS continue to expand, however, especially for Budd-Chiari syndrome and hydrothorax. Other more novel indications include bleeding portal hypertensive gastropathy or ectopic varices, Budd-Chiari syndrome, veno-occlusive disease, hepatorenal syndrome, hepatopulmonary syndrome, hepatocellular carcinoma, and polycystic liver disease. Great strides have been made recently in models to predict mortality and complications following TIPS placement. Graft stents hold promise based on early studies. Finally, complications are common and may be life threatening.     

Portal hypertension, varices, and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts

Transjugular intrahepatic protosystemic shunts (TIPS) is the newest and the least invasive method of eradicating varices. This article defines portal hypertension succinctly, describes how it gives rise to varices and their consequences, and briefly reviews the development, short experience with, and current status of TIPS.     

Fasting hyperglucagonemia in patients with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS).

BACKGROUND: Hyperglucagonemia has been described to be associated with insulin resistance in patients with liver cirrhosis. Portosystemic shunts may be involved in the etiology of hyperglucagonemia. To test this hypothesis we investigated fasting peripheral plasma glucagon levels before and after portal decompression by transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunting (TIPS). METHODS: Glucagon, insulin, plasma glucose, HbA1c, and C-peptide were determined in peripheral venous samples from 21 non-diabetic (ND)- and 15 diabetic patients (D; 3 treated with insulin, 3 with sulfonylurea, 9 with diet alone) with liver cirrhosis, showing comparable clinical features (gender, age, BMI, creatinine, Child-Pugh-score, complications, and etiology of liver cirrhosis) before, 3 and 9 months after elective TIPS implantation. Insulin resistance was calculated as R (HOMA) according to the homeostasis model assessment (HOMA). RESULTS: Glucagon levels before TIPS were elevated in patients with diabetes compared to patients without diabetes (D: 145.4 +/- 52.1 pg/ml vs. ND: 97.3 +/- 49.8 pg/ml; p = 0.057). 3 and 9 months after TIPS implantation glucagon levels increased significantly in ND (188.9 +/- 80.3 pg/ml and 187.2 +/- 87.6 pg/ml) but not in D (169.6 +/- 62.4 pg/ml and 171.9 +/- 58.4 pg/ml). While plasma glucose, HbA1c, and C-peptide were significantly higher in D than in ND, they did not change significantly 3 and 9 months after TIPS implantation. Insulin was increased in D before TIPS (D: 31.6 +/- 15.9 mU/l vs. ND: 14.8 +/- 7.1 mU/l; p = 0.0001). 3 and 9 months after TIPS insulin significantly increased in ND (26.6 +/- 14.7 mU/l and 23.2 +/- 10.9 mU/l vs. 14.8 +/- 7.1 mU/l before TIPS) but not in D. In ND R (HOMA) also increased from 3.5 +/- 2 mU x mmol/l(2) to 5.7 +/- 3.3 mU x mmol/l(2) after 3 and 5.4 +/- 2.6 mU x mmol/l(2) after 9 months. BMI, liver and kidney function did not change with time. CONCLUSION: In non-diabetic cirrhotic patients TIPS implantation is followed by an increase of glucagon. However, this does not result in a worsening of glycemic control, probably because of a simultaneous increase of insulin.     

Effect of technical parameters on transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts utilizing stent grafts

AIM: To assess the effect of technical parameters on outcomes of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt(TIPS) created using a stent graft.METHODS: The medical records of 68 patients who underwent TIPS placement with a stent graft from 2008 to 2014 were reviewed by two radiologists blinded to the patient outcomes.Digital Subtraction Angiographic images with a measuring catheter in two orthogonal planes was used to determine the TIPS stent-to-inferior vena cava distance(SIVCD),hepatic vein to parenchymal tract angle(HVTA),portal vein to parenchymal tract angle(PVTA),and the accessed portal vein.The length and diameter of the TIPS stent and the use of concurrent variceal embolization were recorded by review of the patient's procedure note.Data on re-intervention within 30 d of TIPS placement,recurrence of symptoms,and survival were collected through the patient's chart.Cox proportional regression analysis was performed to assess the effect of these technical parameters on primary patency of TIPS,time to recurrence of symptoms,and all-cause mortality.RESULTS: There was no significant associationbetween the SIVCD and primary patency(P = 0.23),time to recurrence of symptoms(P = 0.83),or allcause mortality(P = 0.18).The 3,6,and 12-mo primary patency rates for a SIVCD ≥ 1.5 cm were 82.4%,64.7%,and 50.3% compared to 89.3%,83.8%,and 60.6% for a SIVCD of 1.5 cm(P = 0.29).The median time to stenosis for a SIVCD of ≥ 1.5 cm was 19.1 mo vs 15.1 mo for a SIVCD of 1.5 cm(P = 0.48).There was no significant association between the following factors and primary patency: HVTA(P = 0.99),PVTA(P = 0.65),accessed portal vein(P = 0.35),TIPS stent diameter(P = 0.93),TIPS stent length(P = 0.48),concurrent variceal embolization(P = 0.13) and reinterventions within 30 d(P = 0.24).Furthermore,there was no correlation between these technical parameters and time to recurrence of symptoms or all-cause mortality.Recurrence of symptoms was associated with stent graft stenosis(P = 0.03).CONCLUSION: TIPS stent-to-caval distance and other parameters have no significant effect on primary patency,time to recurrence of symptoms,or all-cause mortality following TIPS with a stent-graft.     

A model to predict poor survival in patients undergoing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) may worsen liver function and decrease survival in some patients. The Child-Pugh classification has several drawbacks when used to determine survival in such patients. The survival of 231 patients at 4 medical centers within the United States who underwent elective TIPS was studied to develop statistical models to (1) predict patient survival and (2) identify those patients whose liver-related mortality post-TIPS would be 3 months or less. Among these elective TIPS patients, 173 had the procedure for prevention of variceal rebleeding and 58 for treatment of refractory ascites. Death related to liver disease occurred in 110 patients, 70 within 3 months. Cox proportional-hazards regression identified serum concentrations of bilirubin and creatinine, international normalized ratio for prothrombin time (INR), and the cause of the underlying liver disease as predictors of survival in patients undergoing elective TIPS, either for prevention of variceal rebleeding or for treatment of refractory ascites. These variables can be used to calculate a risk score (R) for patients undergoing elective TIPS. Patients with R > 1.8 had a median survival of 3 months or less. This model was superior to both the Child-Pugh classification, as well as the Child-Pugh score, in predicting survival. Using logistic regression and the same variables, we also developed a nomogram that indicates which patients survive less than 3 months. Finally, the model was validated among an independent set of 71 patients from the Netherlands. This Mayo TIPS model may predict early death following elective TIPS for either prevention of variceal rebleeding or for treatment of refractory ascites.     

Safety and efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization in patients with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts

BackgroundTransarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is an important option as the majority of patients present with advanced disease. Data regarding treatment outcomes in patients who have undergone transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) are limited. The present study seeks to evaluate the safety and efficacy of TACE in HCC patients with a TIPS.MethodsA retrospective review identifying patients with HCC and concomitant TIPS who were treated with TACE was performed.ResultsFrom 1999 to 2014, 16 patients with HCC underwent a total of 27 TACE procedures; eight patients required multiple treatments. The median patient age at the time of the initial TACE was 60.5 years [interquartile range (IQR) : 52.5–67.5] with the majority being male (n = 12, 75%) and Childs–Pugh Class B (n = 12, 75%). At 6 weeks after TACE, 56.3% of patients achieved an objective response rate (complete and partial response) by mRECIST criteria. Clavien Grade 3 or higher complications occurred in 11.1% of TACE procedures. There were no peri-procedural deaths. The median progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 9 and 22 months, respectively, when censored for liver transplantation (median follow-up: 11.5 months).ConclusionTACE is an effective treatment strategy for HCC in TIPS patients; albeit may be associated with higher complication rates.     

Using transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts to control variceal bleeding before liver transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the safety and efficacy of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) in controlling bleeding from esophageal varices in patients awaiting liver transplantation. DESIGN: Prospective, uncontrolled trial. SETTING: University medical center with an active liver transplant program. PATIENTS: Thirteen patients referred for liver transplantation with either active variceal hemorrhage or recurrent variceal hemorrhage despite sclerotherapy; four patients had been previously treated with surgical portosystemic shunts. INTERVENTION: An intrahepatic portosystemic shunt created via a transjugular approach to the hepatic veins using expandable, flexible metallic stents. MEASUREMENTS: Portal pressures before and after the creation of the shunt, the direction of portal blood flow at differing diameters of the shunts, procedure-related complications, and outcome in terms of survival, liver transplantation, and recurrent variceal bleeding. MAIN RESULTS: The transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt was placed successfully in 13 patients, and bleeding was controlled acutely in all 13. After the procedure, the mean portal pressure decreased from 34 +/- 8.9 cm H2O to 22.4 +/- 5.4 cm H2O (P less than 0.001). No complications were associated with the procedure; however, two patients died of causes unrelated to the procedure. Seven patients subsequently underwent liver transplantation and are doing well, and three patients are being managed conservatively. Bleeding recurred in one patient 102 days after the procedure secondary to shunt occlusion caused by neointimal proliferation. CONCLUSION: Placement of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt is apparently safe and effective therapy for variceal hemorrhage in patients referred for liver transplantation.     

Passive expansion of sub-maximally dilated transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts and assessment of clinical outcomes

AIM To assess for passive expansion of sub-maximally dilated transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts(TIPS) and compare outcomes with maximally dilated TIPS.METHODS Polytetrafluoroethylene covered TIPS(Viatorr) from July 2002 to December 2013 were retrospectively reviewed at two hospitals in a single institution. Two hundred and thirty patients had TIPS maximally dilated to 10 mm(m TIPS), while 43 patients who were at increased risk for hepatic encephalopathy(HE), based on clinical evaluation or low pre-TIPS portosystemic gradient(PSG), had 10 mm TIPS sub-maximally dilated to 8 mm(sm TIPS). Group characteristics(age, gender, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score, post-TIPS PSG and clinical outcomes were compared between groups, including clinical success(ascites or varices), primary patency,primary assisted patency, and severe post-TIPS HE. A subset of fourteen patients with sm TIPS underwent follow-up computed tomography imaging after TIPS creation, and were grouped based on time of imaging( 6 mo and 6 mo). Change in diameter and crosssectional area were measured with 3D imaging software to evaluate for passive expansion.RESULTS Patient characteristics were similar between the sm TIPS and m TIPS groups, except for pre-TIPS portosystemic gradient, which was lower in the sm TIPS group(19.4 mm Hg ± 6.8 vs 22.4 mm Hg ± 7.1, P = 0.01). Primary patency and primary assisted patency between sm TIPS and m TIPS was not significantly different(P = 0.64 and 0.55, respectively). Four of the 55 patients(7%) with sm TIPS required TIPS reduction for severe refractory HE, while this occurred in 6 of the 218 patients(3%) with m TIPS(P = 0.12). For the 14 patients with follow-up computed tomography(CT) imaging, the median imaging follow-up was 373 d. There was an increase in median TIPS diameter, median percent diameter change, median area, and median percent area change in patients with CT follow-up greater than 6 mo after TIPS placement compared to follow-up within 6 mo(8.45 mm, 5.58%, 56.04 mm~2, and 11.48%, respectively, P = 0.01).CONCLUSION Passive expansion of sm TIPS does occur but clinical outcomes of sm TIPS and m TIPS were similar. Sub-maximal dilation can prevent complications related to overshunting in select patients.     

经颈静脉肝内门体分流术的规范化问题

经颈静脉肝门体分流术(transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt, TIPS)临床应用以来,避免了危险而复杂的外科开放手术以及由此带来的较大创伤和全身麻醉的危险,控制了病情的发展,挽救了患者的生命.     

Neurophysiological evidence of cognitive impairment in patients without hepatic encephalopathy after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to test the hypothesis that subclinical cognitive brain dysfunction in cirrhotic patients would deteriorate after a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) in the absence of clinically detectable hepatic encephalopathy. METHODS: Out of 49 consecutive cirrhotic patients receiving elective TIPS for recurrent variceal hemorrhage, we identified 22 patients who were not encephalopathic and had not undergone liver transplantation at 6-month follow-up and confirmed TIPS patency by Doppler ultrasound. Patients were tested before and 6 months after TIPS implantation using event-related (P300) cognitive evoked potentials, late somatosensory median nerve (N70) potentials, and standard psychometric tests (Mini-Mental State and trailmaking test A). Twenty-two age-matched healthy subjects served as controls. RESULTS: Relative to controls, patients showed significantly impaired P300 and N70 latencies and abnormal psychometric test results at baseline. Six months after the TIPS, a further impairment of P300 latency was observed (p = 0.005), whereas no relevant changes in N70 latency and psychometric test results occurred. CONCLUSIONS: In cirrhotic patients with portal hypertension, neurophysiological signs of cognitive brain dysfunction are detectable in the absence of hepatic encephalopathy. A further subclinical deterioration of cognitive processing was observed 6 months after the TIPS. These findings demonstrate an aggravation of subclinical hepatic encephalopathy after a TIPS.     

Course of thrombocytopenia of chronic liver disease after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS)

Thrombocytopenia associated with chronic liver disease presents a difficult management issue. Most reports conclude that portocaval and distal splenorenal shunts do not improve platelet counts in this setting. The response of thrombocytopenia after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt placement has not been studied. All platelet counts of 21 patients undergoing intrahepatic shunt placement were determined retrospectively to accumulate values at one month prior to procedure, weekly for the first month after the procedure, and monthly thereafter to six months. Comparison of pre- and postshunt platelet means showed a significant increase in counts in patients with a postshunt portal pressure gradient <12 mm Hg, with the increment evident by one week after the procedure. This response was not seen when preshunt thrombocytopenia was used as the lone variable. This study suggests that the transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt may improve the thrombocytopenia associated with liver cirrhosis when these pressure gradients are attained.     

Miscellaneous indications for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent-shunt

This review will discuss the use of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent-shunt in a number of relatively uncommon clinical situations. In particular, we will focus our paper on the use of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent-shunt for hepatic hydrothorax, hepatopulmonary syndrome, veno-occlusive disease, portal hypertensive gastropathy and gastric antral vascular ectasia, before surgery and after liver transplantation.     

Fluoroscopy-induced radiodermatitis after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt is a nonsurgical procedure used to manage the complications of portal hypertension. This report describes three cases of fluoroscopy-induced radiodermatitis after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt and reviews the characteristics and treatment of radiation-induced skin reactions.     

Hepatic encephalopathy after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) has been used for more than 20 years to treat some of the complications of portal hypertension. When TIPS was initially proposed, it was claimed that the optimal calibration of the shunt could allow an adequate reduction of portal hypertension, avoiding, at the same time, the occurrence of hepatic encephalopathy (HE), a neurologic syndrome. However, several clinical observations have shown that HE occurred rather frequently after TIPS, and HE has become an important issue to be taken into consideration in TIPS candidates and a problem to be faced after the procedure.