Atopiform dermatitis

It is proposed to introduce the term 'atopiform dermatitis' to describe patients who have dermatitis with many of the characteristics of true atopic dermatitis, but who are not atopic. Atopy should be defined as the genetically determined and environmentally influenced syndrome in which the primary immunological abnormality is the production of allergen-specific IgE. It is suggested that by making a distinction between atopiform dermatitis and true atopic dermatitis, subsequent genetic, immunological and therapeutic studies will be improved. Furthermore, atopiform dermatitis would be a more appropriate diagnosis for the atopic dermatitis-like skin diseases that may occur in syndromes such as phenylketonuria, Schwachman's syndrome, Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome, Netherton's syndrome, Job's syndrome, selective IgA deficiency, agammaglobulinaemia and ataxia telangiectasia. In contrast to patients with true atopy, patients with atopiform dermatitis can logically be advised that allergen avoidance is not required, as they have no allergen-specific IgE.     

Validation and refinement of the Millennium Criteria for atopic dermatitis

There is no gold standard for a definite diagnosis of atopic dermatitis. For the time being, several lists of diagnostic criteria have been proposed, some of them in actual use. The Millennium Criteria have been proposed to diagnose atopic dermatitis and to differentiate it from atopiform dermatitis. Our aim was to further refine the Millennium Criteria into a manageable set that can differentiate between atopic and atopiform dermatitis and other entities. The hereby refined Millennium Criteria will be compared with the UK Working Party Criteria and the Hanifin & Rajka Criteria. Data of 210 included patients were used. After multiple logistic regression, a minimum set of five criteria was identified as best discriminators: (i) typical morphology; (ii) early age of onset; (iii) Dennie-Morgan fold; (iv) historical and (v) actual flexural involvement. The refined Millennium Criteria were constituted from these criteria. When comparing the different list for validity in diagnosing atopic dermatitis, the refined Millennium Criteria showed a sensitivity of 81.8% and a specificity of 98.8% compared to a sensitivity of 97.7% and specificity of 72.9% of the UK Criteria and a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 48.8% of the Hanifin & Rajka Criteria. This refinement and validity study shows that the refined Millennium Criteria are a valid tool to diagnose atopic and atopiform dermatitis in a hospital-based setting and therefore could be incorporated in clinical practice and trials.     

特应性皮炎临床特点和诊断标准的探讨

目的 探讨康克非和田润梅提出的特应性皮炎(AD)诊断标准(简称康田标准)的适用性。方法 用康田标准对917例经Hanifin和Rajka诊断标准(简称HR标准)确诊的AD患者进行诊断,并分析AD患者的遗传过敏史及其临床特点。结果 888例AD患者符合康田标准,占96.84%.有个人或家族过敏史者占83.21%.婴儿期AD患者面部皮炎的发生率高于儿童期和青少年、成人期,而其干皮症、鱼鳞病、毛周角化、眶周黑晕的发生率又低于儿童期和青少年、成人期。结论 遗传过敏史是AD诊断中的一个重要因素。康田标准是一个合理实用的诊断标准,值得推广使用。     

Comparative efficacy of Hanifin and Rajka''s criteria and the UK working party''s diagnostic criteria in diagnosis of atopic dermatitis in a hospital setting in North India

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of atopic dermatitis (AD) depends on clinical features because no definitive diagnostic test exists. Criteria proposed by Hanifin and Rajka (Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 1980; Suppl 92: 44-47) were acceptable for hospital-based studies but were found not to be suitable for field studies. A UK working party formulated clinical diagnostic criteria that could be used in both hospital and epidemiological settings. Validation studies of the criteria showed widely variable results, probably due to different clinical settings and ethnicity. AIM AND OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to validate Hanifin and Rajka's criteria and to assess the comparative efficacy of their criteria and the UK working party's diagnostic criteria in the diagnosis of AD in a hospital setting in North India. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: This study serially included 101 patients with AD and 48 controls of paediatric age group. The study period was from July 2003 to December 2004. RESULTS: Hanifin and Rajka's criteria (sensitivity 96%, specificity 93.75%, positive predictive value 97% (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) 91.84%) had a statistical advantage over the UK working party's diagnostic criteria (sensitivity 86%, specificity 95.83%, PPV 97.75% and NPV 76.67%), with a P-value < 0.005.     

Prominent pruritic periumbilical papules: A diagnostic sign in pediatric atopic dermatitis

Establishment of diagnostic criteria for atopic dermatitis has been a subject of controversy and frequent reevaluation. The diagnostic criteria of Hanifin and Rajka are those most frequently cited. In order to fit the diagnosis, a patient must demonstrate three major criteria plus four or more minor criteria. Although individually the minor criteria are not diagnostic, their presence suggests the possibility of atopic dermatitis. Recently we evaluated several children who developed prominent periumbilical papules as a major component of their atopic dermatitis. This finding, while not present in all children with atopic dermatitis, can provide a specific clue to diagnosis and should be considered as a new minor criterion for atopic dermatitis in children.     

Atopic dermatitis: which are the diagnostic criteria used in medical literature?

INTRODUCTION: Diagnosis of atopic dermatitis currently relies on diagnostic criteria scales developed by Hanifin and Rafka in 1980 and by the "United Kingdom Working party" in 1994. Some authors have proposed: "AEDS" [sM1] and "Atopiform Dermatitis", which has led to the distinction between different sub-populations and the exclusion of certain diseases from the diagnosis of atopic dermatitis. The aim of our study was to collect the criteria retained in the scientific medical literature during the year 2002 for the definition of atopic dermatitis and to try to understand not only the interest but also the questions that the various definitions lead to. METHOD: A PubMed research was launched with the key word "atopic dermatitis" from January to September of 2002. All the scientific articles either in French or in English were studied. RESULTS: Hanifin and Rafka's criteria were selected in 44 p. 100 of the scientific articles, and the "United Kingdom Working Party" criteria in 12 p. 100. Personal definitions were used in 21 p. 100 of the articles; these were based on the level of total and specific IgE or on personal clinical criteria. For twenty-three p. 100 of the authors, the definition of atopic dermatitis was not specified. DISCUSSION: There was not just one definition of atopic dermatitis. This may affect the interpretation of diagnostic or therapeutic papers concerning the disease, because there has been no proof that these definitions cover the same population of patients.     

A comparison of expression of surface-bound immunoglobulin E on antigen-presenting cells in cutaneous tissue between patients with allergic, irritant and atopic dermatitis

The expression of surface-bound immunoglobulin E by dendritic cells within cutaneous tissue has been compared in atopic and contact dermatitis. 45 patients were recruited into 4 groups using clinical criteria and patch testing to a standard series of allergens: atopic (12 cases), allergic contact dermatitis (14 cases), irritant contact dermatitis (10 cases) and the control group (9 cases); using clinical criteria and patch testing to a standard series of allergens. Skin biopsies from each patient were analysed by the indirect immunofluorescence technique. This differentiated 3 patterns of cutaneous IgE distribution: (i) no detectable cutaneous IgE; (ii) detection of IgE solely within the dermis; (iii) detection of IgE within both epidermis and dermis. Detection of IgE within the epidermis was always associated with the presence of IgE within the dermis. In each case, IgE was surface-bound by dendritic cells. Immunoglobulin E was detected within both epidermis and dermis in skin biopsies from 8 (66.7%) atopic patients and 2 (20%) patients with irritant contact dermatitis. No other cases demonstrated IgE deposition within both the epidermis and dermis. Atopic patients were significantly more likely to have detectable IgE deposition, within both epidermis and dermis, than patients with contact dermatitis (allergic and irritant groups combined, p = 0.0011) or controls (p = 0.0049). This finding suggests that the demonstration of IgE within both epidermis and dermis supports a diagnosis of atopic dermatitis. It would therefore be of value in differentiating between atopic and contact dermatitis, where clinical diagnosis is in doubt.     

Correlation of serum total IgE, eosinophil granule cationic proteins, sensitized allergens and family aggregation in atopic dermatitis patients with or without rhinitis

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a complex disease with both a genetic background and environmental interactions. Although multiple linkage-analyses about AD have been studied, there have been only a few family aggregation tests of AD or perennial allergic rhinitis (AR) to date. The association of allergen-specific IgE in AD and atopic dermatitis with allergic perennial rhinitis (ADR) have also been seldom discussed. The purpose of this study was to evaluate family aggregation and assess allergen-specific IgE in patients with AD and ADR. We also planned to investigate the effect of family history of AD on the prevalence of allergen-specific antibodies. The serum levels of IgE, eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) and major basic protein (MBP) were measured and compared in patients with AD and those with ADR. Proportional analysis compared allergen-specific IgE between AD and ADR. The family aggregation was conducted to estimate the odds ratio for various atopic diseases in different family members. Total IgE and allergen-specific antibodies in serum were compared between those patients who had AD with AR and those without. The result revealed that allergic rhinitis is the most common concomitant atopic disease associated with AD. The ADR group was more likely to have serum mite-, cockroach-, and feather-specific IgE. The positive rates for wheat, peanut and soybean were higher in those AD without rhinitis. In the family aggregation of AD, the odds ratio for siblings was higher than for parents, the ratios for brother and sister were 9.91 and 8.75, respectively. However, the odds ratio for parents of ADR was higher than siblings; the ratios for father and mother of ADR were 8.22 and 2.94, respectively. AD patients with family histories of AD were more likely to have mite-, soybean-, and peanut-specific antibodies in their serum. We concluded that aeroallergens are the most important allergens aggravating atopic diseases in Taiwan. Food plays an important role in the pathogenesis of AD. Measurement of serum total IgE combined with the MAST-CLA test could be helpful in the diagnosis of atopic diseases. The differential aggregation tendency for AD and ADR implicated the complexity of the gene-environment interaction in these atopic diseases.     

A half of schoolchildren with ‘ISAAC eczema’ are ill with allergic contact dermatitis

Background Similarity in clinical symptoms between atopic eczema (AE) and allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) may lead to misdiagnoses in both clinical practice and epidemiological studies. As patch testing for contact allergy does not seem popular among paediatric allergists, the resulting bias leads mainly to under diagnosing of ACD and over diagnosing of AE in children and adolescents. Objectives To assess the frequency of AE and ACD among children and adolescents who answered affirmatively the eczema module of ISAAC questionnaire. Methods Of 9320 schoolchildren involved in an allergy screening programme, 143 consecutive participants were recruited for the present study. The inclusion criterion was affirmative answers to questions from the eczema module of the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) questionnaire. The children were examined by two allergists: a paediatrician and a dermatologist, and the children underwent patch testing. Results We diagnosed AE in 46 (55.4%) children and 18 (30.0%) adolescents, whereas 32 (38.6%) children and 31 (51.7%) adolescents were diagnosed with ACD, with a considerable overlap of both diseases. Nine of 46 (19.6%) children and 13 of 25 (52.0%) adolescents with affirmative answers to the question about flexural eczema were diagnosed with ACD, while lacking features sufficient for the diagnosis of AE according to Hanifin and Rajka. Based on the indices from the whole population tested (9320 pupils), a rough estimate of the general ACD prevalence was 5.8% for adolescents, and 8.5% for children, which is close to the figure of 7.2% observed previously in Danish schoolchildren. Conclusions Our data demonstrate that ‘ISAAC eczema’ is an epidemiological entity that embraces comparable portions of cases of atopic eczema and allergic contact dermatitis, and possibly also other less frequent pruritic dermatoses. Each case of chronic recurrent dermatitis in children requires differential diagnosis aimed at allergic contact dermatitis and inflammatory dermatoses other than atopic eczema, even when predominantly localized in flexural areas.     

Correlation of nipple eczema in pregnancy with atopic dermatitis in Northern India: a study of 100 cases

BackgroundNipple eczema is a less common presentation of atopic dermatitis. No studies in the literature have correlated nipple eczema in pregnancy as a manifestation of atopic dermatitis.ObjectiveTo evaluate whether nipple eczema presenting in pregnancy is a manifestation of atopic dermatitis.MethodsThis was a prospective observational study including 100 women who presented with nipple eczema for the first time during pregnancy. The exclusion criteria were any patient with previous history of nipple eczema, those already on oral or topical treatment for atopic dermatitis or nipple eczema, and other disorders mimicking eczema. Patients were divided into two groups ‒ nipple eczema with atopic dermatitis and without atopic dermatitis. Demographic data, clinical features, total leukocyte count, differential leukocyte count, absolute eosinophil counts, and serum IgE levels were compared between the two groups to detect association between nipple eczema in pregnancy and atopic dermatitis.ResultsOut of 100 patients, 39 were diagnosed with atopic dermatitis, whereas 61 were ruled out to have any features suggestive of atopic dermatitis. There were no statistically significant differences in mean age, mean duration of symptoms, and serum IgE levels. In patients with atopic dermatitis, bilateral symptoms were noted more commonly than in patients without the disease, but this was statistically insignificant.Study limitationsLack of long term follow-up and no large studies in literature to compare results.ConclusionNipple eczema in pregnancy follows a similar pattern as in other age groups. The clinical profile of patients is similar in cases with and without atopic dermatitis.     

Prevalence of atopic dermatitis, asthma, allergic rhinitis, and hand and contact dermatitis in adolescents. The Odense Adolescence Cohort Study on Atopic Diseases and Dermatitis

BACKGROUND: Atopic diseases are common in children and adolescents. However, epidemiological knowledge is sparse for hand eczema and allergic contact dermatitis in this age group. Furthermore, no population-based studies have evaluated the prevalence of atopic diseases and hand and contact dermatitis in the same group of adolescents. OBJECTIVES: To assess prevalence measures of atopic dermatitis (AD), asthma, allergic rhinitis and hand and contact dermatitis in adolescents in Odense municipality, Denmark. METHODS: The study was carried out as a cross-sectional study among 1501 eighth grade school children (age 12-16 years) and included questionnaire, interview, clinical examination and patch testing. RESULTS: The lifetime prevalence of AD was 21.3% (girls 25.7% vs. boys 17.0%, P < 0.001) using predefined questionnaire criteria. The 1-year period prevalence of AD was 6.7% and the point prevalence 3.6% (Hanifin and Rajka criteria). In the interview the lifetime prevalence of inhalant allergy was estimated as 17.7% (6.9% allergic asthma, 15.7% allergic rhinitis). The lifetime prevalence of hand eczema based on the questionnaire was 9.2%, the 1-year period prevalence was 7.3% and the point prevalence 3.2%, with a significant predominance in girls. A significant association was found both between AD and inhalant allergy, and between AD and hand eczema using lifetime prevalence measures. The point prevalence of contact allergy was 15.2% (girls 19.4% vs. boys 10.3%, P < 0.001), and present or past allergic contact dermatitis was found in 7.2% (girls 11.3% vs. boys 2.5%). Contact allergy was most common to nickel (8.6%) and fragrance mix (1.8%). CONCLUSIONS: High prevalence figures were found for atopic diseases, hand eczema and allergic contact dermatitis, and the diseases were closely associated. A considerable number of adolescents still suffers from AD, and a considerable sex difference was noted for hand eczema and allergic contact dermatitis. Nickel allergy and perfume allergy were the major contact allergies. In the future this cohort of eighth grade school children will be followed up with regard to the course and development of atopic diseases, hand eczema and contact dermatitis.     

A comparison between criteria for diagnosing atopic eczema in infants

BACKGROUND: Epidemiological studies have shown different estimates of the frequency of atopic eczema (AE) in children. This may be explained by several factors including variations in the definition of AE, study design, age of study group, and the possibility of a changed perception of atopic diseases. The role of IgE sensitization in AE is a matter of debate. OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence and cumulative incidence of AE in a group of unselected infants followed prospectively from birth to 18 months of age using different diagnostic criteria; to evaluate the agreement between criteria; and to describe the association between atopic heredity and postnatal sensitization, respectively, and the development of AE according to the different diagnostic criteria. METHODS: During a 1-year period a consecutive series of 1095 newborns and their parents were approached at the maternity ward at the Odense University Hospital, Denmark and a cohort of 562 newborns was established. Infants were examined and followed prospectively from birth and at 3, 6, 9, 12 and 18 months of age. AE was diagnosed using four different criteria, the Hanifin and Rajka criteria, the Schultz-Larsen criteria, the Danish Allergy Research Centre (DARC) criteria developed for this study and doctor-diagnosed visible eczema with typical morphology and atopic distribution. Additionally, the U.K. diagnostic criteria based on a questionnaire were used at 1 year of age. Agreement between the four criteria was analysed at each time point and over time, and agreement between the four criteria and the U.K. questionnaire criteria was analysed. RESULTS: The cumulative 1-year prevalence of AE using the Hanifin and Rajka criteria was 9.8% (95% confidence interval, CI 7-13%), for the Schultz-Larsen criteria it was 7.5% (95% CI 5-10%), for the DARC criteria 8.2% (95% CI 6-11%), for visible eczema 12.2% (95% CI 9-16%) and for the U.K. criteria 7.5% (95% CI 5-10%). The pairwise agreement between criteria showed good agreement, with rates varying between 93% and 97% and kappa scores between 0.6 and 0.8. Agreement analysis of diagnoses between the four criteria demonstrated that cumulative incidences showed better agreement than point prevalence values. CONCLUSIONS: Agreement between different criteria for diagnosing AE was acceptable, but the mild cases constituted a diagnostic problem, although they were in the minority. Repeated examinations gave better agreement between diagnostic criteria than just one examination. Atopic heredity was less predictive for AE than sensitization to common food and inhalant allergens in early childhood.     

Atopic dermatitis and melanocytic naevi

A study was performed to test the clinical impression that adults with severe atopic dermatitis (AD) have a low number of common naevi (CN). The number of CN > or = 2 mm was investigated in 51 Caucasian patients aged 20-63 years with severe AD since early childhood. The control group consisted of 379 randomly selected subjects, aged 30-50 years, investigated in an earlier study. Patients with AD had a significantly (P < 0.0001) lower total body count of CN (mean 9, median 5) compared with the control group (mean 67, median 53). It was also found that in the AD group there was a significant (P < 0.001) negative correlation between serum IgE and number of CN [r(s) = -0.50, 95% CI (-0.69; -0.24)]. The explanation for the low number of naevi that we have found in this highly selected subgroup of AD patients is not known. The atopic inflammation in the skin, genetics and treatment used for eczema are possible factors that may influence the formation of melanocytic naevi.     

变应原特异性免疫治疗及其在特应性皮炎中的作用

变应原特异性免疫治疗是惟一可影响变态反应性疾病病程的治疗方法，通过调节抗原提呈细胞功能、诱生变应原特异性调节性T细胞、诱导抗体类别转换等机制起效。传统方法应用天然变应原提取物，近年发展出了重组变应原、肽疫苗、DNA疫苗等新型策略。临床试验表明，变应原特异性免疫治疗可用于部分特应性皮炎患者的治疗。     

Sensitization to thimerosal in atopic children

Thimerosal is an organic mercurial compound widely used as a preservative in vaccines, eyedrops, and contact lens cleaning and storage solutions. 5 infants, 2 female and 3 male, ranging in age from 7 to 28 months and affected by atopic dermatitis (AD) diagnosed according to the Hanifin and Rajka criteria, experienced an exacerbation of their clinical condition 2-10 days after mandatory vaccinations with vaccines containing thimerosal. Cutaneous lesions of nummular eczema appeared on the trunk, limbs and face. All patients were patch tested with serial dilutions of thimerosal in petrolatum. A positive patch test reaction to thimerosal 0.1% pet. was observed in all 5 children. 3 of them also showed a positive reaction at 0.01% and 0.05% pet. Despite their thimerosal-hypersensitivity, all children completed the entire series of mandatory vaccinations, care being taken to use different needles for injection and aspiration of the vaccine. The 2-year follow-up did not reveal other episodes of exacerbation of the AD after vaccination. The present study confirms the high frequency of sensitization to thimerosal in atopic children and suggests that vaccination can cause clinical symptoms in sensitized children. Nevertheless, sensitization to thimerosal does not prevent children from continuing with mandatory vaccinations.     

Clinical improvement and significant reduction of total serum IgE in patients suffering from severe atopic dermatitis treated with oral azathioprine

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common inflammatory skin disease: the incidence is increasing in many countries and treatment can be difficult. The aim of this retrospective case series was to examine the effect of oral azathioprine on the clinical severity and serum IgE levels in 38 patients with severe atopic dermatitis. The AD was well-controlled in nearly 80% (30/38). The maintenance dose required was in the range 25-200 mg per day. Four patients withdrew because of adverse affects, including one case of pancytopenia, and a further four ceased azathioprine after 4 months because of a lack of clinical improvement. Total serum IgE levels were measured before commencing azathioprine and after two years of treatment in 26 patients. IgE levels decreased in almost all patients and this was statistically significant (P = 0.012).     

Omalizumab for treatment of refractory severe atopic dermatitis. A pediatric perspective

Omalizumab is a monoclonal antibody, targeting Fc receptor of IgE, approved for the treatment of allergic asthma and chronic spontaneous urticaria. Its utility in atopic dermatitis appears controversial from data in literature since the molecule is well tolerated but it seems less effective than other medications used in adult patients (eg, Dupilumab). At present, the use of Dupilumab is not approved in pediatric patients therefore there are no second level treatments available in this age group. Here we report two clinical cases of patients (15 and 16 years old) suffering from both atopic dermatitis and asthma, treated with Omalizumab. Our experience suggests that atopic eczema of young patients with allergic comorbidities can benefit from asthma treatment with Omalizumab observing improvement on both conditions.     

ETFAD/EADV eczema task force 2009 position paper on diagnosis and treatment of atopic dermatitis

Background The diagnosis of atopic dermatitis (AD) is made using evaluated clinical criteria. Management of AD must consider the symptomatic variability of the disease. Methods EADV eczema task force developed its guideline for atopic dermatitis diagnosis and treatment based on literature review and repeated consenting group discussions. Results and Discussion Basic therapy relies on hydrating topical treatment and avoidance of specific and unspecific provocation factors. Anti‐inflammatory treatment based on topical glucocorticosteroids and topical calcineurin antagonists is used for exacerbation management and more recently for proactive therapy in selected cases. Topical corticosteroids remain the mainstay of therapy, but the topical calcineurin inhibitors, tacrolimus and pimecrolimus are preferred in certain locations. Systemic anti‐inflammatory treatment is an option for severe refractory cases. Microbial colonization and superinfection may induce disease exacerbation and can justify additional antimicrobial/antiseptic treatment. Systemic antihistamines (H1) can relieve pruritus, but do not have sufficient effect on eczema. Adjuvant therapy includes UV irradiation preferably of UVA1 wavelength or UVB 311 nm. Dietary recommendations should be specific and given only in diagnosed individual food allergy. Allergen‐specific immunotherapy to aeroallergens may be useful in selected cases. Stress‐induced exacerbations may make psychosomatic counselling recommendable. ‘Eczema school’ educational programmes have been proven to be helpful.     

Hand dermatitis among university hospital nursing staff with or without atopic eczema: assessment of risk factors

Background. Nurses are prone to develop hand dermatitis. Although an atopic constitution has been identified as a genetic risk factor, the behavioural risk factors associated with hand dermatitis in wet work conditions have not been fully explored. Objectives. This study aimed to clarify the impact of atopic eczema (fulfilling the diagnostic criteria during the past 1 year) on the occurrence of hand dermatitis and to identify the behavioural risk factors among non‐atopic nurses with hand dermatitis. Methods. From August 2007 to July 2009, nurses from Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital were recruited. The associations between different risk factors and hand dermatitis were documented. In addition, the behavioural risk factors among non‐atopic nurses were evaluated via observational study. Results. One thousand one hundred and thirty‐two nurses participated in the first part of the study, which revealed that individuals with atopic eczema had a 3.76‐fold increased risk for hand dermatitis. However, among 248 nurses with hand dermatitis, only 43 had atopic eczema. The observational study performed on 140 non‐atopic nurses identified frequency of hand washing as the behavioural risk factor associated with hand dermatitis. Conclusions. Although atopic eczema is the major risk factor for hand dermatitis, those with atopic eczema constitute only 17% of nurses with hand dermatitis. Decreasing hand washing frequency is the most effective strategy to reduce the occurrence of hand dermatitis among non‐atopic nurses.