Epigenetic events underlie the pathogenesis of sinonasal papillomas.

Benign inverted papillomas have been reported as monoclonal but lacking common genetic alterations identified in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Epigenetic changes alter the heritable state of gene expression and chromatin organization without change in DNA sequence. We investigated whether epigenetic events of aberrant promoter hypermethylation in genes known to be involved in squamous head and neck cancer underlie the pathogenesis of sinonasal papillomas. Ten formalin-fixed paraffin DNA samples from three inverted papilloma cases, two exophytic (everted) papilloma cases, and two cases with inverted and exophytic components were studied. DNA was obtained from microdissected areas of normal and papilloma areas and examined using a panel of 41 gene probes, designed to interrogate 35 unique genes for aberrant methylation status (22 genes) using the methylation-specific multiplex-ligation-specific polymerase assay. Methylation-specific PCR was employed to confirm aberrant methylation detected by the methylation-specific multiplex-ligation-specific polymerase assay. All seven cases indicated at least one epigenetic event of aberrant promoter hypermethylation. The CDKN2B gene was a consistent target of aberrant methylation in six of seven cases. Methylation-specific PCR confirmed hypermethylation of CDKN2B. Recurrent biopsies from two inverted papilloma cases had common epigenetic events. Promoter hypermethylation of CDKN2B was a consistent epigenetic event. Common epigenetic alterations in recurrent biopsies underscore a monoclonal origin for these lesions. Epigenetic events contribute to the underlying pathogenesis of benign inverted and exophytic papillomas. As a consistent target of aberrant promoter hypermethylation, CDKN2B may serve as an important epigenetic biomarker for gene reactivation studies.     

Identification of Novel Methylation Markers in Hepatocellular Carcinoma using a Methylation Array

Promoter CpG island hypermethylation has become recognized as an important mechanism for inactivating tumor suppressor genes or tumor-related genes in human cancers of various tissues. Gene inactivation in association with promoter CpG island hypermethylation has been reported to be four times more frequent than genetic changes in human colorectal cancers. Hepatocellular carcinoma is also one of the human cancer types in which aberrant promoter CpG island hypermethylation is frequently found. However, the number of genes identified to date as hypermethylated for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is fewer than that for colorectal cancer or gastric cancer, which can be attributed to fewer attempts to perform genome-wide methylation profiling for HCC. In the present study, we used bead-array technology and coupled methylation-specific PCR to identify new genes showing cancer-specific methylation in HCC. Twenty-four new genes have been identified as hypermethylated at their promoter CpG island loci in a cancer-specific manner. Of these, TNFRSF10C, HOXA9, NPY, and IRF5 were frequently hypermethylated in hepatocellular carcinoma tissue samples and their methylation was found to be closely associated with inactivation of gene expression. Further study will be required to elucidate the clinicopathological implications of these newly found DNA methylation markers in hepatocellular carcinoma.     

Clinicopathologic significance of DNA methyltransferase 1, 3a, and 3b overexpression in Tunisian breast cancers

DNA methyltransferase 1, 3a, and 3b affect DNA methylation, and it is thought that they play an important role in the malignant transformation of various cancers. The current study was designed to analyze DNA methyltransferase expression by immunohistochemistry in a series of 94 Tunisian sporadic breast carcinomas. Results were correlated to clinicopathologic parameters and promoter methylation status of 8 tumor suppressor genes (BRCA1, BRCA2, RASSFA1, TIMP3, CDH1, P16, RARβ2, and DAPK). Overexpression of DNA methyltransferase 1, 3a, and 3b was detected in 46.8%, 32%, and 44.7% of cases, respectively. A significant correlation was found between DNA methyltransferase 1 overexpression and Scarff-Bloom-Richardson histologic grade III (P = .01). DNA methyltransferase 3a overexpression was significantly associated with menopausal status (P = .01), Scarff-Bloom-Richardson histologic grade III (P = .0001), estrogen (P = .04) and progesterone (P = .007) receptor negativity, and HER2 overexpression (P = .004). However, DNA methyltransferase 3a overexpression was found less frequently in the luminal A intrinsic breast cancer subtype (9.7%) than in luminal B (53%), HER2 (41%), and triple-negative (50%) subtypes (P = .001). DNA methyltransferase 3b overexpression shows significant correlation with promoter hypermethylation of BRCA1 (P = .03) and RASSFA1 (P = .04) and with the hypermethylator phenotype (more than 4 methylated genes, P = .01). These data suggest that overexpression of various DNA methyltransferases might represent a critical event responsible for the epigenetic inactivation of multiple tumor suppressor genes, leading to the development of aggressive forms of sporadic breast cancer.     

DNA methylation patterns in hereditary human cancers mimic sporadic tumorigenesis.

Cancer cells have aberrant patterns of DNA methylation including hypermethylation of gene promoter CpG islands and global demethylation of the genome. Genes that cause familial cancer, as well as other genes, can be silenced by promoter hypermethylation in sporadic tumors, but the methylation of these genes in tumors from kindreds with inherited cancer syndromes has not been well characterized. Here, we examine CpG island methylation of 10 genes (hMLH1, BRCA1, APC, LKB1, CDH1, p16(INK4a), p14(ARF), MGMT, GSTP1 and RARbeta2) and 5-methylcytosine DNA content, in inherited (n = 342) and non-inherited (n = 215) breast and colorectal cancers. Our results show that singly retained alleles of germline mutated genes are never hypermethylated in inherited tumors. However, this epigenetic change is a frequent second "hit", associated with the wild-type copy of these genes in inherited tumors where both alleles are retained. Global hypomethylation was similar between sporadic and hereditary cases, but distinct differences existed in patterns of methylation at non-familial genes. This study demonstrates that hereditary cancers "mimic" the DNA methylation patterns present in the sporadic tumors.     

A developmentally regulated inducer of EMT,LBX1, contributes to breast cancer progression

Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) plays an important role during normal embryogenesis, and it has been implicated in cancer invasion and metastasis. Here, we report that Ladybird homeobox 1 (LBX1), a developmentally regulated homeobox gene, directs expression of the known EMT inducers ZEB1, ZEB2, Snail1, and transforming growth factor β2 (TGFB2). In mammary epithelial cells, overexpression of LBX1 leads to morphological transformation, expression of mesenchymal markers, enhanced cell migration, increased CD44^high/CD24^low progenitor cell population, and tumorigenic cooperation with known oncogenes. In human breast cancer, LBX1 is up-regulated in the unfavorable estrogen receptor (ER)/progesterone (PR)/HER2 triple-negative basal-like subtype. Thus, aberrant expression of LBX1 may lead to the activation of a developmentally regulated EMT pathway in human breast cancer.     

Gene silencing of TSPYL5 mediated by aberrant promoter methylation in gastric cancers

DNA methylation is crucial for normal development, but gene expression altered by DNA hypermethylation is often associated with human diseases, especially cancers. The gene TSPYL5, encoding testis-specific Y-like protein, was previously identified in microarray screens for genes induced by the inhibition of DNA methylation and histone deacetylation in glioma cell lines. The TSPYL5 showed a high frequency of DNA methylation-mediated silencing in both glioma cell lines and primary glial tumors. We now report that TSPYL5 is also inactivated by DNA methylation and could be a putative epigenetic target gene in gastric cancers. We found that the expression of TSPYL5 mRNA was frequently downregulated and inversely correlated with DNA methylation in seven out of nine gastric cancer cell lines. TSPYL5 mRNA expression was also restored after treating with a DNA methyltransferase inhibitor. In primary gastric tumors, methylation-specific PCR results in 23 of the 36 (63.9%) cases revealed that the hypermethylation at CpG islands of the TSPYL5 was detectable at a high frequency. Furthermore, TSPYL5 suppressed the growth of gastric cancer cells as demonstrated by a colony formation assay. Thus, strong associations between TSPYL5 expression and hypermethylation were observed, and aberrant methylation at a CpG island of TSPYL5 may play an important role in development of gastric cancers.     

GSTP1 promoter hypermethylation is an early event in breast carcinogenesis

Promoter hypermethylation in precursor lesions of the breast cancer may be biomarkers of cancer risk and targets for cancer chemoprevention. Pi-class glutathione-S-transferases (GSTP1) is inactivated by promoter hypermethylation in invasive breast cancers. However, little is known about epigenetic silencing of GSTP1 gene by promoter hypermethylation in precursor lesions. To determine the significance of GSTP1 promoter hypermethylation in breast carcinogenesis, methylation status of GSTP1 gene was studied by nested methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction, and GSTP1 expression was studied by immunohistochemistry in invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC), ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), usual ductal hyperplasia (UDH), and normal breast tissue. GSTP1 promoter hypermethylation was detected in 4/24 (16.7%) of UDH, 18/49 (36.7%) of DCIS, and 14/36 (38.9%) of IDC. No hypermethylation was detected in normal breast tissues. GSTP1 promoter hypermethylation was found to be progressively elevated during breast carcinogenesis (p < 0.01). GSTP1 promoter hypermethylation was associated with loss of GSTP1 expression (p < 0.01 for UDH, p < 0.001 for DCIS and IDC). Our results suggest that GSTP1 promoter hypermethylation is an early event in breast carcinogenesis and appears to functionally silence GSTP1 expression. GSTP1 promoter hypermethylation in the precursor lesions of breast cancer may be used as a target for cancer chemoprevention.     

Microarray analysis of promoter methylation in lung cancers

Aberrant DNA methylation is an important event in carcinogenesis. Of the various regions of a gene that can be methylated in cancers, the promoter is the most important for the regulation of gene expression. Here, we describe a microarray analysis of DNA methylation in the promoter regions of genes using a newly developed promoter-associated methylated DNA amplification DNA chip (PMAD). For each sample, methylated Hpa II-resistant DNA fragments and Msp I-cleaved (unmethylated + methylated) DNA fragments were amplified and labeled with Cy3 and Cy5 respectively, then hybridized to a microarray containing the promoters of 288 cancer-related genes. Signals from Hpa II-resistant (methylated) DNA (Cy3) were normalized to signals from Msp I-cleaved (unmethylated + methylated) DNA fragments (Cy5). Normalized signals from lung cancer cell lines were compared to signals from normal lung cells. About 10.9% of the cancer-related genes were hypermethylated in lung cancer cell lines. Notably, HIC1, IRF7, ASC, RIPK3, RASSF1A, FABP3, PRKCDBP, and PAX3 genes were hypermethylated in most lung cancer cell lines examined. The expression profiles of these genes correlated to the methylation profiles of the genes, indicating that the microarray analysis of DNA methylation in the promoter region of the genes is convenient for epigenetic study. Further analysis of primary tumors indicated that the frequency of hypermethylation was high for ASC (82%) and PAX3 (86%) in all tumor types, and high for RIPK3 in small cell carcinoma (57%). This demonstrates that our PMAD method is effective at finding epigenetic changes during cancer.Electronic Supplementary Material Supplementary material is available for this article at and is accessible for authorized users.     

Pattern of expression of genes linked to epigenetic silencing in human breast cancer

Epigenetic mechanisms such as DNA methylation are now recognized to play an important role in neoplasia. The aim of this study is to relate the pattern of expression of multiple cancer genes known to undergo epigenetic inactivation by promoter hypermethylation in breast cancer with histologic and outcome data. We used immunohistochemistry to study expression of the tumor suppressor gene p16, estrogen receptor (ER) alpha, ERbeta, progesterone receptor (PR), and the DNA repair gene MGMT (O6 -methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase) in a panel of 200 breast cancers. Methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction was used to confirm MGMT promoter methylation. Loss of expression of MGMT, ERalpha, ERbeta, PR, and p16 was observed in 19%, 24%, 13%, 40%, and 50% of cases, respectively. A significant correlation was seen between grade III tumor and loss of expression of ERalpha, ERbeta, PR (all P < .0001), and MGMT (P = .04), whereas loss of expression of p16 was associated with grades I and II tumors (P < .001). Cases that expressed 3 or less of the 5 proteins studied had significantly reduced survival (P = .0016). Methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction in a subset of 20 cancers showed DNA methylation associated with the loss of MGMT expression (P < .001). In conclusion, there is silencing of several key genes in breast cancer affecting molecular pathways involved in cell immortalization, DNA repair, and hormonal regulation, and this correlates significantly with risk of cancer-specific death. This expression profile could be linked to epigenetic events, and if so, these pathways have potential as targets for therapeutic strategies based on reversal of epigenetic silencing.     

Distinct patterns of promoter CpG island methylation of breast cancer subtypes are associated with stem cell phenotypes

Although DNA methylation profiles in breast cancer have been connected to breast cancer molecular subtype, there have been no studies of the association of DNA methylation with stem cell phenotype. This study was designed to evaluate the promoter CpG island methylation of 15 genes in relation to breast cancer subtype, and to investigate whether the patterns of CpG island methylation in each subtype are associated with their cancer stem cell phenotype represented by CD44+/CD24- and ALDH1 expression. We performed MethyLight analysis of the methylation status of 15 promoter CpG island loci involved in breast cancer progression (APC, DLEC1, GRIN2B, GSTP1, HOXA1, HOXA10, IGF2, MT1G, RARB, RASSF1A, RUNX3, SCGB3A1, SFRP1, SFRP4, and TMEFF2) and determined cancer stem cell phenotype by CD44/CD24 and ALDH1 immunohistochemistry in 36 luminal A, 33 luminal B, 30 luminal-HER2, 40 HER2 enriched, and 40 basal-like subtypes of breast cancer. The number of CpG island loci methylated differed significantly between subtypes, and was highest in the luminal-HER2 subtype and lowest in the basal-like subtype. Methylation frequencies and levels in 12 of the 15 genes differed significantly between subtypes, and the basal-like subtype had significantly lower methylation frequencies and levels in nine of the genes than the other subtypes. CD44+/CD24- and ALDH1+ putative stem cell populations were most enriched in the basal-like subtype. Methylation of promoter CpG islands was significantly lower in CD44+/CD24-cell (+) tumors than in CD44+/CD24-cell (-) tumors, even within the basal-like subtype. ALDH1 (+) tumors were also less methylated than ALDH1 (-) tumors. Our findings showed that promoter CpG island methylation was different in relation to breast cancer subtype and stem cell phenotype of tumor, suggesting that breast cancers have distinct patterns of CpG island methylation according to molecular subtypes and these are associated with different stem cell phenotypes of the tumor.     

HOXD13 methylation status is a prognostic indicator in breast cancer

Homeobox protein Hox-D13 is encoded by HOXD13 gene which is frequently methylated in cancer and has been recognized as a tumor suppressor in pancreatic cancer. In this study, we examined HOXD13 mRNA expression in 40 pairs of breast cancers and corresponding normal breast tissues. Bisulfite sequencing of HOXD13 promoter was performed in 6 pairs of breast tumors and corresponding normal breast tissues to examine the potential HOXD13 CpG methylated sites. HOXD13 DNA methylation frequency analysis was performed using MethyLight in 196 pairs of breast cancers and corresponding normal breast samples. DNA methylation status and clinico-pathological features were investigated. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards models were utilized to assess the effect of methylation status on overall survival. We found that 60% (24/40) of breast cancers showed low HOXD13 mRNA expression when compared with corresponding normal breast tissue. The predicted CpG island was located in the -1325 bp to +675 bp region. Next, the -332 bp site in HOXD13 gene promoter was further examined and in 57.7% (113/196) samples methylation was detected at this site. HOXD13 methylation was correlated with larger tumor size (P = 0.004), but not with other clinico-pathological parameters. In addition, patients with methylated -HOXD13 promoter had worse overall survival (OS) (P = 0.005). Based on our results we conclude that HOXD13 methylation is a common event in primary breast cancer and is associated with poor survival of breast cancer patients. HOXD13 methylation could therefore potentially be used as a prognostic factor for breast cancer.     

The phenotypic spectrum of basal-like breast cancers: a critical appraisal

There are 2 well-recognized cell populations lining the mammary duct system: the epithelial cells lining the lumen and the myoepithelial cells surrounding them. The mammary stem cell, a putative third cell type, has not yet been well characterized. It is not established whether the putative stem cell expresses the full complement, a subset, or none of the markers of normal epithelial and/or myoepithelial cells. However, it is likely that they would have distinctive markers of their own; whether these are retained or lost in their neoplastic progeny is unknown. All 3 cell types may theoretically undergo malignant transformation. Until recently, however, nearly all attention has been focused on carcinomas of epithelial derivation/differentiation. The advent of oligonucleotide and cDNA microarrays has facilitated gene expression profiling of breast cancers, revealing molecular subclasses that may be prognostically relevant. One such subclass, the basal-like breast carcinomas, has been found in numerous independent datasets to be associated with a comparatively worse overall and disease-free survival. These cancers show expression of molecules characteristic of the normal myoepithelial cell, such as basal cytokeratins, and reduced expression of estrogen receptor-related and Erb-B2-related genes and proteins. The classifier genes that formed the basis for the delineation of basal-like carcinomas were derived from datasets that were composed predominantly of ductal type cancers. Therefore, the clinical significance of a basal-like gene expression or immunohistochemical profile in the other breast cancer subtypes is presently unknown. Herein, we evaluate in detail the current state of knowledge on the pathologic features of breast carcinomas classified as basal-like by immunohistochemical and/or gene expression profiling criteria, with an emphasis on their full phenotypic spectrum and also previously underemphasized areas of heterogeneity and ambiguity where present. There seems to be a phenotypic and biologic spectrum of basal-like or myoepithelial-type carcinomas, just as there is a wide range among tumors of luminal epithelial derivation/differentiation. It is critical to promote lucid morphologic definitions of the molecular subtypes, if this information is intended for use in targeted therapies and patient management.     

Loss of TET2 in hematopoietic cells leads to DNA hypermethylation of active enhancers and induction of leukemogenesis

DNA methylation is tightly regulated throughout mammalian development, and altered DNA methylation patterns are a general hallmark of cancer. The methylcytosine dioxygenase TET2 is frequently mutated in hematological disorders, including acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and has been suggested to protect CG dinucleotide (CpG) islands and promoters from aberrant DNA methylation. In this study, we present a novel Tet2-dependent leukemia mouse model that closely recapitulates gene expression profiles and hallmarks of human AML1-ETO-induced AML. Using this model, we show that the primary effect of Tet2 loss in preleukemic hematopoietic cells is progressive and widespread DNA hypermethylation affecting up to 25% of active enhancer elements. In contrast, CpG island and promoter methylation does not change in a Tet2-dependent manner but increases relative to population doublings. We confirmed this specific enhancer hypermethylation phenotype in human AML patients with TET2 mutations. Analysis of immediate gene expression changes reveals rapid deregulation of a large number of genes implicated in tumorigenesis, including many down-regulated tumor suppressor genes. Hence, we propose that TET2 prevents leukemic transformation by protecting enhancers from aberrant DNA methylation and that it is the combined silencing of several tumor suppressor genes in TET2 mutated hematopoietic cells that contributes to increased stem cell proliferation and leukemogenesis.     

DNA methylation analysis of the HIF‐1α prolyl hydroxylase domain genes PHD1, PHD2, PHD3 and the factor inhibiting HIF gene FIH in invasive breast carcinomas

Huang K T, Mikeska T, Dobrovic A & Fox S B
(2010) Histopathology 57, 451–460
DNA methylation analysis of the HIF‐1α prolyl hydroxylase domain genes PHD1, PHD2, PHD3 and the factor inhibiting HIF gene FIH in invasive breast carcinomas Aims: Hypoxia‐inducible factor‐1 (HIF‐1) activity is regulated by prolyl hydroxylase (PHD1, PHD2, PHD3) and factor inhibiting HIF‐1 (FIH) that target the α subunit of HIF‐1 (HIF‐1α) for proteosomal degradation. We hypothesised that the elevated HIF‐1α level is due in some tumours to epigenetic silencing by DNA hypermethylation of the promoter region of one or more of the PHDs and FIH genes. The aims were to define the presence or absence of promoter methylation of PHDs and FIH in cell lines of various sources and breast carcinomas and, if present, determine its effect on mRNA and protein expression. Methods and results: Tumour cell lines (n = 20) and primary invasive breast carcinomas (n = 168) were examined for promoter region DNA methylation using methylation‐sensitive high‐resolution melting. There was evidence of PHD3 but not of PHD1, PHD2 or FIH DNA methylation in breast cancer (SkBr3) and leukaemic (HL60 and CCRF‐CEM) cell lines, but there was no evidence of methylation in any of 168 breast cancers. Only the high‐level PHD3 methylation seen in leukaemic cell lines correlated with absent mRNA and protein expression. Conclusions: Methylation‐induced epigenetic silencing of PHD1, PHD2, PHD3 and FIH is unlikely to underlie up‐regulated HIF‐1α expression in human breast cancer but may play a role in other tumour types.