PUVA-gel vs. PUVA-bath therapy for severe recalcitrant palmoplantar dermatoses. A randomized, single-blinded prospective study

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: In order to avoid unwanted effects of systemic psoralen and ultraviolet A (PUVA) therapy, various topical PUVA treatment modalities have been developed and are being increasingly used. However, up to now very few controlled studies comparing the therapeutic efficacy of different topical photochemotherapy modalities are available. Thus, the aim of our study was to compare the clinical efficacy of conventional PUVA-bath therapy to topical PUVA-gel therapy in patients with recalcitrant dermatoses of the palms and soles. METHODS: Twenty patients with severe palmoplantar dermatoses or localized psoriatic plaques were enrolled in our observer-blinded, randomized half-sided study. The treatment modalities compared were: (i) aqueous 8-methoxypsoralen (8-MOP)-containing gel plus broadband UVA irradiation (PUVA-gel therapy) and (ii) 8-MOP bath of the hands and/or feet plus broadband UVA (PUVA-bath therapy). RESULTS: On the body half, which was randomized to PUVA-gel therapy, the median Area and Severity Index for palmoplantar dermatoses (ASIppd) decreased from 28 (range 6-56) to 1.5 (range 1-37, P = 0.00) after a median 33 (13-49) irradiations compared with a reduction from 26.5 (range 6-52.5) to 1.5 (range 0-38, P = 0.00) for PUVA-bath therapy. Both improvements of ASIppd scores were found to be statistically significant, with no significant difference between PUVA-gel and PUVA-bath therapy. Severe phototoxic reactions such as strong erythema, blistering and/or pain were not observed in any patient. CONCLUSION: PUVA-gel therapy seems to be an effective therapeutic alternative to conventional PUVA-bath therapy in treating localized dermatoses of the palms and soles. The advantage of PUVA-gel therapy is reduced organizational efforts and expenses.     

Treatment of severe recalcitrant dermatoses of the palms and soles with PUVA-bath versus PUVA-cream therapy

PUVA-bath therapy developed into a first line topical PUVA therapy, and gel and cream preparations have been described as alternative modes of topical 8-MOP application. Because bath-PUVA can be difficult to manage, topical PUVA therapy using 8-MOP gel or cream preparations may become an important alternative when treating localised skin diseases. However, controlled comparisons of efficacy with this alternative topical PUVA therapy are lacking. We therefore compared the efficacy of PUVA-cream therapy with PUVA-bath therapy in 12 patients with recalcitrant dermatoses of the palms and soles using a left/right trial design. These patients responded well to both treatment modalities, meaning that both could be used successfully to treat recalcitrant dermatoses of the palms and soles.     

Topical PUVA, etretinate, and combined PUVA and etretinate for palmoplantar pustulosis: comparison of therapeutic efficacy and the influences of tonsillar and dental focal infections

Twenty patients with palmoplantar pustulosis (PPP) were treated with topical PUVA, oral etretinate (Re), or combined PUVA and etretinate (Re-PUVA). Re and Re-PUVA treated sites improved and/or cleared more rapidly than PUVA treated sites. Complete clearance was observed in six of ten sites treated with Re-PUVA, two of ten with Re, and one of ten sites with PUVA within 12 weeks. UVA-control sites failed to be cleared within 12 weeks. Remission periods after stopping the treatment were 1.5 +/- 0.5 weeks (n = 2) with Re, 10.5 +/- 11.4 weeks (n = 6) with Re-PUVA, and one year (n = 1) with PUVA. These results overall suggested that Re-PUVA is the most effective treatment for PPP. Tonsillar focal infection (TFI) and dental focal infection (DFI) were found in 6/20 and 17/20 patients, respectively. However, the presence of focal infection (FI), TFI and/or DFI, did not appear to interfere with the therapeutic activities of Re and/or PUVA, because the complete clearance rates and remission periods in FI(+) patients were comparable with those in FI(-) patients.     

局部PUVA治疗白癜风的疗效观察

为了探讨局部PUVA治疗癜风的疗效,对80例白癜风患者进行局部PUVA治疗。结果表明经30次治疗后,总有效率为85.00%,其中125例（18.75%）患者痊愈。局限型白癜风有较好的疗效。疗效与病程相关,与皮肤光毒反应无关。     

Hand and foot PUVA soaks: An audit of the Massachusetts General Hospital''s experience from 1994 to 1998

Palmoplantar psoriasis and eczema can be chronic recalcitrant dermatoses. Oral psoralen plus ultraviolet A (PUVA) has proven effective for these, but has a number of unwanted side effects. Previous studies have shown that regional PUVA therapy using the 8-methoxypsoralen (8-MOP) soak method followed by immediate UVA irradiation is also beneficial and well tolerated. The purpose of this audit was to determine the efficacy of hand and foot PUVA soaks by reviewing the experience of the Massachusetts General Hospital's Phototherapy Unit with this treatment modality. Phototherapy records of all patients who underwent hand and foot PUVA soaks from 1994 to 1998 were reviewed. Details regarding the treatment procedure, patient compliance, patient response and incidence of side effects were noted and summarized. Of the 56 patients who underwent at least 20 treatments, 29% had excellent response, 42% had minimal to moderate response, and 29% had poor response. The average number of treatments to induce clearing was 41. The average maximum treatment dose at clearing was 5.85 J/cm2, while the average cumulative dose to achieve clearing was 267.17 J/cm2. 8-MOP PUVA soak therapy is quite useful for chronic hand and foot dermatoses. Patient compliance must be emphasized to obtain favorable results.     

The use of topical PUVA for palmoplantar dermatoses

Palmoplantar dermatoses have a tendency to be chronic and are frequently recalcitrant to treatment. We summarize our experience with paint PUVA in the treatment of 125 patients with palmoplantar dermatoses between the years 1996 and 2000. The dominant clinical picture of the lesions was hyperkeratosis in 84, pustulosis in 11 and exudative dermatitis in the remaining 30 patients. The treatment was applied thrice weekly on alternate days. The affected skin was painted with methoxsalen 0.1% solution, and exposed 30 minutes later to UVA radiation, starting at 0.25 J/cm(2), with increments of 0.25-0.50 J/cm(2) every third treatment. Complete response was considered if all signs disappeared, and partial response if improvement occurred in more than 75% of each of the clinical findings of scaling erythema, fissuring, pustule formation and infiltration. Sixty-nine percent of the patients had a good response (i.e. a complete or partial response), which was achieved in 78.5% of the exudative dermatitis lesions, but in only 46.7% of the pustular lesions. The average time to achieve good response was 13 weeks (range 1-42), with an average total dose of 50 J/cm(2) (range 0.50-366). Maintenance therapy every 1-4 weeks was recommended for all responding patients, but only 58 consented and were treated for an average period of 10 additional weeks. Side effects were minor and transient, mainly mild first-degree superficial skin burns in 10 patients, and patchy hyperpigmentation in three patients, which resolved after a few weeks.     

Paired comparison of bathwater versus oral delivery of 8-methoxypsoralen in psoralen plus ultraviolet: A therapy for chronic palmoplantar psoriasis

BACKGROUND: Both bath psoralen plus ultraviolet A (PUVA) and oral PUVA with 8-methoxypsoralen (8-MOP) have been successfully used for the treatment of recalcitrant palmoplantar psoriasis. This trial was designed to assess the efficacy and side effects of the different treatment modalities in a randomized half-side comparison. Methods: Eight patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis on soles (n = 6) and/or palms (n = 8) were randomly assigned to receive bath PUVA treatment on one side and oral PUVA on the other. Initial treatment dose was 50% of the minimal phototoxic dose evaluated for bath PUVA and oral PUVA. Treatment was given three times a week for 4 weeks. Before treatment and every week a severity index (SI) was assessed by summing the scores of erythema, infiltration, scaling and vesicles evaluated on a scale from 0 to 4. After 4 weeks of treatment the half-side trial was finished and the treatment was continued on both sides with the more effective treatment regimen. RESULTS: Both bath PUVA and oral PUVA achieved a reduction of the mean initial SI from 5.9 (95% confidence intervals (CI) 4.5-8.0) to 3.3 (1.8-6.0) (44% SI reduction, P < 0.005, Student's paired t-test) and 6.0 (5.0-7.8) to 2.9 (1.8-4.0) (52% SI reduction; P < 0.005), respectively. The statistical comparison of the entire 4-week study period revealed a significant better effect in lesions treated with oral PUVA compared with bath PUVA (P = 0.033). However, at 4 weeks, there was no significant difference between the achieved SI reduction of oral PUVA and bath PUVA. Systemic side effects (nausea and/or dizziness) were only observed after oral PUVA. CONCLUSION: This study gives evidence that in the first 4 treatment weeks oral PUVA is slightly more effective than bath PUVA but the former has more systemic side effects.     

Retrospective long‐term follow‐up in patients with chronic palmoplantar dermatoses after good response to bath PUVA therapy

Background: Numerous studies have confirmed the short‐term effectiveness of 8‐methoxypsoralen bath PUVA therapy in patients with chronic palmoplantar dermatoses; however, little is known about long‐term results. Patients and methods: In this retrospective study we examined the long‐term results in 79 patients (mean age: 48 years) with chronic palmoplantar dermatoses who were treated with bath PUVA three times a week over an 8‐year period. A good clinical response (a reduction of more than 50% of the skin lesions) occurred after a mean of 23 treatments and a mean cumulative UVA dose of 39 J/cm² in 51 patients (65%). In 2007 a questionnaire was sent to these 51 patients to assess the long‐term outcome. Results: With bath PUVA treatment, the best results were found in patients with hyperkeratotic eczema (17/22; 77% good clinical response) followed by patients with palmoplantar psoriasis (26/41; 63%) and patients with dyshidrotic eczema (8/16; 50%). Thirty‐four patients (67%) answered the questionnaire after a mean follow‐up interval of 4.3 years (10–87 months). Among these patients, 36% reported an improved course of disease after PUVA therapy with reduced frequency and/or intensity of the skin rash, and 29% of patients reported continued complete clearance. 79% of our patients reported a long‐term reduction in the use of topical corticosteroids during the follow‐up period (mean: 4.3 years). In addition, 67% of patients reported a lasting improvement in quality of life. Conclusions: These data show that bath PUVA may have a long‐term, beneficial influence on the course of disease in a majority of patients with recalcitrant chronic palmoplantar dermatoses.     

Oral PUVA and topical steroids for treatment of oral manifestations of chronic graft-vs.-host disease

BACKGROUND: Oral manifestations of chronic graft-vs.-host disease (cGVHD) can significantly affect the quality of life and severity often does not correlate with systemic manifestations. We evaluated the use of topical corticosteroids and the intraoral application of psoralen-UVA (PUVA) for treatment of oral manifestations of cGVHD. METHODS: Overall, 18 patients with oral manifestations of cGVHD were treated with either intraoral PUVA (n=7) or with topical corticosteroids (n=16). Four patients received intraoral PUVA after failure of topical steroids and one patient was treated with topical corticosteroids after failing treatment with intraoral PUVA. A glass fiber extension of an UVA source was used for manual intraoral application. Treatment with topical corticosteroids consisted of 0.1 mg/ml dexamethasone mouth wash four times a day in combination with antifungal prophylaxis. RESULTS: Four patients showed complete local response (CR) due to intraoral PUVA, two improved and one did not respond. Topical corticosteroids resulted in nine patients in CR, two improved and five did not respond. CONCLUSION: Intraoral PUVA as well as topical corticosteroids are effective in treatment of oral manifestations of oral GVHD with few side-effects and improve quality of life in patients with cGVHD.     

PUVA-bath photochemotherapy (PUVA-soak therapy) of recalcitrant dermatoses of the palms and soles

PUVA-bath therapy has proven to avoid many side effects associated with oral 8-methoxypsoralen (8-MOP) treatment. In order to investigate the effectiveness of topical PUVA-bath therapy (PUVA-soak therapy) on chronic palmoplantar dermatoses, 30 patients with plaque-type psoriasis, pustular psoriasis, endogenous eczema, dyshidrotic eczema and hyperkeratotic dermatitis of the palms and soles were treated over 8 weeks with PUVA-soak using 8-MOP. No additional treatment except skin moisturising cream such as unguentum emulsificans aquosum was used during the study period. The single UVA-doses applied ranged from 0.3 to 3.0 J/cm2 (mean single dose of 1.8 J/cm2), with a mean cumulative dose of 48.6 J/cm2 per patient. Altogether 26 of 30 patients responded well within 8 weeks of treatment with 63% of all patients showing a complete remission and 23% showing considerable improvement, as shown by flattening of plaques, decreased scaling and erythema, as well as decreased vesicle and pustule formation. The condition responding best to our therapy was palmoplantar psoriasis followed by atopic eczema. Hyperkeratotic dermatitis displayed the poorest responding rates in this study. Unwanted side effects such as erythema, pain, blistering or patchy hyperpigmentation were not observed in any of the patients. We conclude that PUVA-soak therapy can be highly efficient in the treatment of palmoplantar dermatoses, especially in the management of palmoplantar psoriasis.     

Oral vs. bath PUVA using 8-methoxypsoralen for chronic palmoplantar eczema

Background: Both oral and bath PUVA with 8-methoxypsoralen (8-MOP) have been shown to be effective in the treatment of chronic palmoplantar eczema. However, most studies were retrospective and did not include longer follow-up periods.
Aim: To compare the therapeutic efficacy, tolerability and duration of remission after oral vs. bath PUVA using 8-MOP in patients with chronic palmoplantar eczema.
Methods: Twenty-nine patients were randomly allocated to treatment with oral or bath PUVA. Treatment was given thrice weekly for a maximum of 20 weeks. The primary outcome measure was the improvement in eczema score at the end of treatment. After clearing patients were followed up until relapse or up to 40 months.
Results: Overall, both PUVA modalities appeared comparably effective. However, after stratifying according to eczema type, significant differences in therapeutic outcome in general as well as in response to the two regimes were found. Dyshidrotic eczema responded better to both treatments ( P =0.048) and remained longer in remission than hyperkeratotic eczema. Hyperkeratotic eczema cleared significantly better with oral than with bath PUVA ( P =0.03).
Conclusion: Oral PUVA is preferable for patients with hyperkeratotic eczema and bath PUVA for patients with dyshidrotic eczema.     

Topical 0.25% methotrexate gel in a hydrogel base for palmoplantar psoriasis

Palmoplantar psoriasis (PPP) is a chronic, disfiguring condition, and its management is difficult. The systemic side effects of methotrexate can be avoided if it is effective topically. We studied the efficacy and safety of a recently marketed topical methotrexate (0.25%) preparation in a hydrogel base in patients with palmoplantar lesions. A total of 14 adult patients diagnosed clinically as plaque type of palmoplantar psoriasis (>30% of the palm and/or sole areas involved) were included in the study. Topical methotrexate 0.25% in a hydroxygel base was applied twice daily to the lesions for twelve weeks. The lesions were assessed for degree of erythema, scaling, induration and fissuring (ESIF) and were scored on a severity score of 0-3 (0--clear, 1--mild, 2--moderate, 3--severe) every two weeks. The most severe condition was given 12 points; 0 denoted no disease. The response at the end of the study was graded as minimal if there was up to 25% reduction in the EISF score, mild as 26-50% reduction, moderate improvement as 51-75% reduction in score, and marked improvement as >75% reduction in score. The average age of the 11 male and female patients was 41.5 years (18-57 years) with the duration of the disease varying from 2 months to 15 years. Ten patients had both palmar and plantar lesions; two each had only palmar lesions or plantar lesions. The ESI score at baseline was 5.8 +/- 0.9 for the palms and 6.8 +/- 0.5 for the soles. The scores at the end of the study were 3.5 +/- 0.7 for palms and 4.8 +/- 0.2 for the soles. The average time taken for improvement was at least six weeks. None of the patients had complete clearance of lesions. The drug was well tolerated by all patients. Methotrexate 0.25% in a hydrophilic gel is well tolerated but is not very effective in controlling the lesions of psoriasis on the palms and soles. A higher concentration in a different base with better penetration could possibly provide better results.     

Case of punctate palmoplantar keratoderma type I treated with combination of low‐dose oral acitretin and topical salicylic acid and steroid

Palmoplantar keratodermas (PPK) are heterogeneous disorders characterized by abnormal keratinization. Especially, punctate PPK (PPPK), one of the subtypes of hereditary PPK, is a rare punctate keratoderma characterized by tiny “raindrop” keratoses having a tendency to coalesce on the edge of soles, which are exposed to sustained pressure. If typical punctate lesions are confined to the palms and soles and the patient has a family history and late onset, it can be considered as PPPK type I (PPKP1), also called Buschke–Fisher–Brauer disease. The exact etiology of PPPK has not been fully understood. Furthermore, no standardized treatment for PPPK has been established and treatment options are limited. Above all, traditional systemic retinoids have been used in several cases, but dose‐related adverse effects are common. Therefore, combination of low‐dose systemic retinoids and adjuvant topical therapy can be an alternative treatment option for PPPK. Herein, we report a case of PPKP1 treated with combination of low‐dose oral acitretin (10 mg/day) and topical salicylic acid and steroid. Despite low capacity, low‐dose acitretin showed excellent regression of the lesions by combined use of topical ointments. The supplementary topical therapy may be useful in reducing the dose of systemic retinoids and preventing potential toxicity.     

Treatment of a case of mycosis fungoides and one of parapsoriasis en plaque with topical PUVA using a monofunctional furocoumarin derivative, 4,6,4'-trimethylangelicin

A case of plaque stage mycosis fungoides and one of parapsoriasis en plaque were treated with topical PUVA therapy using a monofunctional furocoumarin derivative, 4,6,4'-trimethylangelicin (TMA). Both patients showed complete clearance of eruptions within 16 treatments. The therapeutic effectiveness of TMA was confirmed by the fact that those eruptions exposed to UVA alone, without TMA application, showed slower and less significant improvement. Histologically, dermal infiltrates of mycosis cells and associated epidermotrophism disappeared almost completely in response to TMA PUVA. No side effects or changes in values in laboratory examinations were observed during treatment.     

Satisfactory Remission Achieved by PUVA Therapy in Langerhans Cell Hisiocytosis in an Elderly Patient

Langerhans cell histiocytosis is currently regarded as a reactive proliferative process of Langerhans cells rather than a malignancy. The disease is characterized by Langerhans cell infiltration of skin, lung, bone and other organs. We report a 74-year-old man with Langerhans cell histiocytosis who had generalized hemorrhagic and crusted papules. He also had diabetes insipidus. Because he did not have any severe constitutional symptoms or failure of vital organs, we applied topical PUVA treatment to his skin lesions, which responded well to the therapy. Diabetes insipidus, however, remained, in spite of X ray radiotherapy for the pituiary lesion.     

Comparison of the efficacy of local narrowband ultraviolet B (NB-UVB) phototherapy versus psoralen plus ultraviolet A (PUVA) paint for palmoplantar psoriasis

Palmoplantar psoriasis is an idiopathic disabling condition, often resistant to conventional therapies. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of local narrowband ultraviolet B (NB-UVB) phototherapy and to compare it with local psoralen plus ultraviolet A (PUVA) paint in patients with palmoplantar psoriasis unresponsive to conventional therapies other than phototherapy. A cohort of 25 patients with palmoplantar psoriasis were included in this study, which was based on a left-to-right comparison pattern. The treatments were administered with local narrowband UVB irradiation on one side and local PUVA on the other side three times a week over 9 weeks. Clinical assessments were performed at baseline and every 3 weeks during the 9-week treatment. There was a statistically significant decrease in the mean clinical scores at the third, sixth and ninth week with both treatments. The difference in clinical response between the two treatment modalities was statistically significant at the end of the treatment period, with the percentage reduction in severity index scores with the PUVA-paint-treated side being 85.45% compared with 61.08% for the NB-UVB treated side (t = 5.379, P = 0.0001, Student's t-test for unpaired samples). Our results show that, although some clinical improvement was achieved with local NB-UVB phototherapy, the results were better with local PUVA, and such a treatment option may be reserved for patients with palmoplantar psoriasis who experience phototoxic reaction to psoralens.     

Guidelines for topical PUVA: a report of a workshop of the British photodermatology group

Psoralen photochemotherapy [psoralen ultraviolet A (PUVA)] plays an important part in dermatological therapeutics, being an effective and generally safe treatment for psoriasis and other dermatoses. In order to maintain optimal efficacy and safety, guidelines concerning best practice should be available to operators and supervisors. The British Photodermatology Group (BPG) have previously published recommendations on PUVA, including UVA dosimetry and calibration, patient pretreatment assessment, indications and contraindications, and the management of adverse reactions.1 While most current knowledge relates to oral PUVA, the use of topical PUVA regimens is also popular and presents a number of questions peculiar to this modality, including the choice of psoralen, formulation, method of application, optimal timing of treatment, UVA regimens and relative benefits or risks as compared with oral PUVA. Bath PUVA, i.e. generalized immersion, is the most frequently used modality of topical treatment, practised by about 100 centres in the U.K., while other topical preparations tend to be used for localized diseases such as those affecting the hands and feet. This paper is the product of a recent workshop of the BPG and includes guidelines for bath, local immersion and other topical PUVA. These recommendations are based, where possible, on the results of controlled studies, or otherwise on the consensus view on current practice.     

Mycosis fungoides: An important differential diagnosis for acquired palmoplantar keratoderma

Mycosis fungoides is the most common subtype of primary cutaneous lymphoma and has several clinical variants. We report a 74‐year‐old man presenting with an acquired palmoplantar keratoderma initially diagnosed and treated as psoriasis with suboptimal improvement. Several months later the patient developed patches and plaques that were histologically consistent with mycosis fungoides. These lesions were ameliorated with the treatment of the underlying mycosis fungoides and the palmoplantar keratoderma resolved promptly with radiotherapy. This case highlights the importance of considering mycosis fungoides as an infrequent but serious cause of acquired palmoplantar keratoderma.     

Comparison of therapeutic efficacy of topical PUVA, oral etretinate, and combined PUVA and etretinate for the treatment of psoriasis and development of PUVA lentigines and antinuclear antibodies

Sixty-two and 38 psoriatic patients were treated with topical PUVA and combined etretinate and topical PUVA (Re-PUVA), respectively. In both groups, 50% of the patients showed initial recovery after 6 weeks and over 90% after 14 weeks. Re-PUVA was more effective than PUVA alone in obtaining complete clearance (p<0.05). To clear psoriasis in 50% of the patients, PUVA and Re-PUVA required 63 and 26 weeks, respectively. Furthermore, the integrated clearance rates after 70 weeks were 50% in PUVA and 63% in Re-PUVA. Each therapy showed a similar remission period; psoriasis recurred in 50% of the patients after 4 months. In addition, 17 patients were treated with oral etretinate, and Re-PUVA was found to be more effective than etretinate monotherapy. Another aim was to determine whether etretinate would inhibit the development of PUVA side effects. Adding etretinate failed to inhibit the production of PUVA lentigines but clearly suppressed antinuclear antibody (ANA) expression. Six of 56 patients treated with PUVA alone developed ANA during the treatment. In marked contrast (p=0.05), ANA was detected in none of 34 patients treated with Re-PUVA.