Peanut allergen Ara h 2-specific T cells are activated via Ras-Erk MAP kinase pathway signalling and identified by CD154 expression

Background. Peanut allergy is driven by peanut-specific Th2 cells. Ara h 2, a peanut 2S albumin, is one of the major peanut allergens. Methods. An Ara h 2-specific T cell line was generated from peanut sensitised C3H/HeJ mice and used to analyse allergen-induced cytokine secretion and activation of signalling molecules. Results. Peanut stimulated splenocytes from peanut sensitised mice had strong proliferation responses and highly elevated IL-4 secretion. The Ara h 2-specific T cells generated from sensitised mice were mainly CD4+ T helper cells with a Th2 cytokine profile. The expression of CD154 on the surface of these T cell clones was detected following Ara h 2 stimulation. Ara h 2 stimulation induced phosphorylation of ZAP-70 and Erk1/2 in the T cells. Conclusions. CD154 is a useful marker for identifying activated, allergen-specific T cells. The Ras-Erk mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway is involved in the activation of Ara h 2-specific Th2 cells.     

Children with peanut allergy recognize predominantly Ara h2 and Ara h6, which remains stable over time

BACKGROUND: In peanut-allergic adults, IgE is mainly directed to Ara h1 and Ara h2. More recently, a role for Ara h6 has been suggested. In contrast to adults, IgE in children can fluctuate over time. Therefore, children may have a more dynamic reactivity to peanut. OBJECTIVE: To examine the IgE reactivity to major peanut allergens in peanut-allergic children at two subsequent time-points. METHODS: Twenty children (3-15 years old) with peanut allergy, confirmed by a double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC), were included. Just before and 20 months after DBPCFC, IgE reactivity to purified Ara h1, Ara h2, Ara h3 and Ara h6 was studied by immunoblots and skin prick tests (SPTs). RESULTS: Before DBPCFC, all peanut-allergic children showed IgE reactivity to Ara h2; Ara h6 was recognized by 16 children, and Ara h1 and Ara h3 by 10 children. After 20 months, peanut-specific IgE levels (median 23 kU/L) and the individual recognition of major allergens were comparable with the levels and recognition before challenge (median 28.2 kU/L). SPT with Ara h2 and Ara h6 was positive in most children, whereas SPT with Ara h1 and Ara h3 was positive in approximately half of the children. Ara h6 induced the largest weals. None of the parameters were related to the severity of peanut allergy. CONCLUSION: Ara h2 and Ara h6 are the most frequently recognized major peanut allergens in children. The individual reactivity to the major peanut allergens remained stable over time, despite DBPCFC.     

Characterization of the T-cell epitopes of a major peanut allergen, Ara h 2

BACKGROUND: The development of safe and effective immunotherapy for peanut allergy has been complicated by the high anaphylactic potential of native peanut extracts. We sought to map the T-cell epitopes of the major peanut allergen, Ara h 2 in order to develop T-cell targeted vaccines. METHODS: A panel of eight peanut-specific CD4+ T-cell lines (TCL) was derived from eight peanut-allergic subjects and proliferative and cytokine responses to stimulation with a set of overlapping 20-mer peptides representing the entire sequence of Ara h 2 determined. Proliferation was assessed in 72 h assays via tritiated thymidine incorporation, while interleukin (IL)-5 and interferon (IFN)-gamma production were assessed via sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) of cell culture supernatants. RESULTS: Eight of the 17 Ara h 2 peptides were recognized by one or more subjects, with the two peptides showing highest reactivity [Ara h 2 (19-38) and Ara h 2 (73-92)] being recognized by three subjects each. Adjoining peptides Ara h 2 (28-47) and Ara h 2 (100-119) induced proliferative responses in two subjects. Each of these peptides was associated with a Th2-type cytokine response. CONCLUSION: Two highly immunogenic T-cell reactive regions of Ara h 2 have been identified, Ara h 2 (19-47) and Ara h 2 (73-119), providing scope for the development of safe forms of immunotherapy for peanut allergy.     

Relevance of Ara h1, Ara h2 and Ara h3 in peanut-allergic patients, as determined by immunoglobulin E Western blotting, basophil–histamine release and intracutaneous testing: Ara h2 is the most important peanut allergen

BACKGROUND: A number of allergenic proteins in peanut has been described and the relative importance of these allergens is yet to be determined. OBJECTIVES: We have investigated the relevance of previously identified peanut allergens in well-characterized peanut-allergic patients by in vitro, ex vivo and in vivo assays. METHODS: Thirty-two adult peanut-allergic patients were included based on careful and standardized patient history and the presence of peanut-specific IgE. The diagnosis peanut allergy was confirmed using double-blind placebo-controlled food challenges in 23 patients. Major peanut allergens Ara h1, Ara h2 and Ara h3 were purified from peanuts using ion-exchange chromatography. IgE immunoblotting was performed and IgE-cross-linking capacity was examined by measuring histamine release (HR) after incubating patient basophils as well as passively sensitized basophils with several dilutions of the allergens. Intracutaneous tests (ICTs) using 10-fold dilution steps of the purified allergens and crude peanut extract were performed. RESULTS: Ara h2 was recognized most frequently (26 out of 32) in all tests and induced both positive skin tests and basophil degranulation at low concentrations, whereas Ara h1 and Ara h3 were recognized less frequently and reacted only at 100-fold higher concentrations as analysed with HR and intracutaneous testing (ICT). Next to the three tested allergens, proteins with molecular weights of somewhat smaller than 15 kDa were identified as a IgE-binding proteins on immunoblot in the majority of the patients (20 out of 32). CONCLUSION: We conclude that Ara h2 is, for our patient group, the most important peanut allergen, and that previously unidentified peanut proteins with molecular weights of somewhat smaller than 15 kDa may be important allergens as well. ICT in combination with basophil-HR and IgE immunoblotting provides insight in the patient specificity towards the individual peanut allergens.     

Capacity of purified peanut allergens to induce degranulation in a functional in vitro assay: Ara h 2 and Ara h 6 are the most efficient elicitors

Background Peanut is a most common and potent food allergen. Many peanut allergens have been characterized using, in particular, IgE-binding studies.
Objectives We optimized an in vitro functional assay to assess the capacity of peanut allergens to degranulate humanized rat basophilic leukaemia cells, RBL SX-38 cells, after sensitization by serum IgE from peanut-allergic patients. We thus compared the activity of the main peanut allergens, i.e. Ara h 1, Ara h 2, Ara h 3 and Ara h 6, purified from roasted peanut.
Methods Sera of 12 peanut-allergic patients were collected and total and peanut-specific IgE were measured. They were used to sensitize RBL SX-38 cells and the degranulation was induced by incubation with ranging concentrations of a whole peanut protein extract or of purified peanut allergens. The mediator release was quantified by the determination of β-hexosaminidase activity in the supernatant. The intensity of the degranulation was expressed as maximum release and as EC50, corresponding to the dose of allergen that induced 50% of the maximum release.
Results For each serum, only 10 IU/mL of human IgE was necessary to sensitize the cells and obtain an optimal degranulation. With all the allergens, the release was positively correlated with the concentration of allergen-specific IgE in the serum used to sensitize the cells. The medians of EC50 obtained for Ara h 2 and Ara h 6 were 2.1 and 2.8 p m , respectively, while they were much higher for Ara h 3 and Ara h 1 (65 and 150 p m , respectively).
Conclusion The RBL SX-38 release assay proved to be sensitive, specific and reproducible. It allowed the comparison of the degranulation potential of different peanut allergens. For all the sera tested, Ara h 2 and Ara h 6 were more potent than Ara h 1 or Ara h 3.     

T cell responses to major peanut allergens in children with and without peanut allergy

Background T cell responses involved in peanut allergy are poorly understood. Objective To investigate T cell responses towards major peanut allergens in peanut‐allergic (PA) subjects compared with peanut‐sensitized (PS) non‐allergic children and non‐atopic (NA) controls. Methods Eighteen PA children, seven non‐allergic PS children and 11 NA adults were included. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were stimulated with a crude peanut extract (CPE). Short‐term T cell lines were generated and subsequently stimulated with CPE and purified Ara h 1, Ara h 2, Ara h 3 and Ara h 6. The proliferation and production of IL‐13, IFN‐γ, IL‐10 and TNF‐α were analysed. Results Proliferation to CPE and major allergens was enhanced in PA subjects. The primary response to CPE was comparable with PS subjects, with increased production of IL‐13 and IFN‐γ compared with NA. Production of IL‐10 was not observed. In short‐term T cell lines, the response to CPE was stronger in PA than in PS and NA subjects. Only PA children had a detectable response to major peanut allergens, characterized by IL‐13 production. The response was the highest after Ara h 3 stimulation, and the lowest after Ara h 2 stimulation. No significant correlation was observed between peanut‐specific IgE levels and T cell responses to CPE. Conclusion T cell responses to CPE in PA and PS children were characterized by Th1 and Th2 cytokines. Only PA children showed enhanced Th2 responses to Ara h 1, Ara h 3 and Ara h 6. Cite this as: A. E. Flinterman, S. G. M. A. Pasmans, C. F. den Hartog Jager, M. O. Hoekstra, C. A. F. M. Bruijnzeel‐Koomen, E. F. Knol and E. van Hoffen, Clinical & Experimental Allergy, 2010 (40) 590–597.     

Ara h 8, a Bet v 1-homologous allergen from peanut, is a major allergen in patients with combined birch pollen and peanut allergy

BACKGROUND: We recently described patients with soybean allergy mainly mediated by cross-reactivity to birch pollen allergens. A majority of those patients were reported to have peanut allergy. OBJECTIVE: We sought to study the occurrence of peanut allergy in patients allergic to birch pollen and characterized the Bet v 1-homologous peanut allergen Ara h 8. METHODS: Recombinant Ara h 8 was cloned with degenerated primers and expressed in Escherichia coli. Nine Swiss and 11 Dutch patients with peanut and birch pollen allergy and a positive double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge result to peanut were investigated for IgE reactivity to birch pollen and purified peanut allergens and cross-reactivity between birch and peanut. Ara h 8 stability against digestion and roasting was assessed by means of RAST inhibition. The IgE cross-linking potency of Ara h 8 was tested on the basis of basophil histamine release. RESULTS: During double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge, all patients experienced symptoms in the oral cavity, progressing to more severe symptoms in 40% of patients. CAP-FEIA detected recombinant (r) Ara h 8-specific IgE in 85%. IgE binding to Ara h 8 was inhibited by Bet v 1 in peanut extract immunoblotting and in RAST inhibition. In EAST inhibition recombinant rAra h 8 inhibited IgE binding to peanut in 4 of 7 tested patient sera. Antipeanut response was dominated by Ara h 8 in 12 of 17 tested patients. Furthermore, our results demonstrate a low stability of Ara h 8 to roasting and no stability to gastric digestion. Basophil histamine release with rAra h 8 was more than 20% in 5 of 7 tested sera. CONCLUSIONS: Peanut allergy might be mediated in a subgroup of our patients by means of cross-reaction of Bet v 1 with the homologous peanut allergen Ara h 8.     

Gastro-duodenal digestion products of the major peanut allergen Ara h 1 retain an allergenic potential

BACKGROUND: The process of gastro-duodenal digestion may play a role in determining the allergenic properties of food proteins. The sensitizing and allergenic potential of digestion products of highly degraded allergens, such as the major peanut allergen Ara h 1, is currently under debate. We evaluated the effect of in vitro gastro-duodenal digestion of Ara h 1 on T cell reactivity and basophil histamine release. METHODS: An in vitro model of gastro-duodenal digestion was used to investigate changes in the allergenic properties of Ara h 1 using in vitro assays monitoring T cell reactivity (proliferation, cytokine production) and histamine release of basophils from peanut allergic individuals. The digestion process was monitored using an SDS-PAGE gel. RESULTS: In vitro gastric digestion led to rapid degradation of Ara h 1 into small fragments M(r) L5600. Gastric digestion did not affect the ability of Ara h 1 to stimulate cellular proliferation. Gastro-duodenal digestion significantly reduced its ability to stimulate clonal expansion (P<0,05; Wilxocon's signed rank test). The Th-2 type cytokine polarization of T cells from peanut allergic donors (IFN-gamma/IL-13 ratio and IFN-gamma/IL-4 ratio of CFSE(low) CD4(+) T cells) remained unchanged regardless of the level of digestion. Histamine release of basophils from peanut allergic individuals was induced to the same extent by native Ara h 1 and its digestion products. CONCLUSION: Gastro-duodenal digestion fragments of Ara h 1 retain T cell stimulatory and IgE-binding and cross-linking properties of the intact protein.     

Quantification of major peanut allergens Ara h 1 and Ara h 2 in the peanut varieties Runner, Spanish, Virginia, and Valencia, bred in different parts of the world

BACKGROUND: The serology of peanut allergy seems to be different in various parts of the world. We analyzed the composition of 13 samples of three varieties of peanut in order to compare their allergenic nature. METHODS: Peanut cultivars that are commonly processed in the West were analyzed for protein content, protein composition, and Ara h 1 and Ara h 2 content by biochemical methods. IgE-binding properties were analyzed by ELISA using serum from patients with documented peanut allergy. RESULTS: Total protein contents were comparable for all tested samples (24-29%), and proteins were extractable to the same extent. SDS-PAGE patterns differed slightly, but all major bands were visible in all samples (molecular masses of approximately 14100 kDa under reducing conditions). Ara h 1 and Ara h 2 were quantified by SDS PAGE densitometry and were expressed as percentage of the total protein content. Ara h 1 was in the range 12-16%, whereas Ara h 2 was 5.9-9.3%. In view of the analytic uncertainty of this determination, the content of both Ara h 1 and Ara h 2 was not significantly different between the tested samples. In an IgE-binding inhibition ELISA, the affinities of the peanut proteins for peanut-specific IgE were measured. Minor differences were observed between the tested samples, with the most potent IgE-binding sample having a two times higher ability to bind IgE than the weakest IgE-binding sample. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that peanuts of different varieties and from different parts of the world contain similar proteins, including Ara h I and Ara h 2. Consequently, the IgE-binding properties are similar to a great extent. This indicates that differences in the serology of peanut allergy may not originate from differences in the allergen composition of the peanut.     

Purification and immunoglobulin E-binding properties of peanut allergen Ara h 6: evidence for cross-reactivity with Ara h 2

BACKGROUND: IgE-binding peanut proteins smaller than 15 kDa were previously identified as potential allergens in the majority of our peanut allergic population. OBJECTIVE: To characterize the novel allergen in order to determine whether it was similar to one of the thus far identified recombinant peanut allergens (Ara h 1-7). METHODS: An IgE-binding protein of <15 kDa was purified and identified via N-terminal sequencing. Its IgE-binding properties were investigated using immunoblotting, basophil degranulation, and skin prick testing. Possible cross-reacting epitopes with other peanut allergens were studied using IgE-immunoblotting inhibition. RESULTS: The purified protein is a monomeric protein with a molecular weight of 14,981 Da as determined using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectroscopy. The amino acid sequence of the first 39 N-terminal residues is identical to that of Ara h 6, indicating that the allergen is Ara h 6. It is recognized by 20 out of 29 peanut-allergic patients on IgE-immunoblot, and its potent biological functionality is demonstrated by the degranulation of basophils, even at concentrations below 10 pg/mL, and by positive skin prick reactions. Ara h 6 has homology to Ara h 2, especially in the middle part and at the C-terminal part of the protein. Almost complete inhibition of IgE-Ara h 6 interaction with Ara h 2 demonstrates that at least part of the epitopes of Ara h 6 are cross-reactive with epitopes on Ara h 2. CONCLUSIONS: Peanut-derived Ara h 6 is a biologically active allergen recognized by the majority of our peanut-allergic patient population and can be considered a clinically relevant peanut allergen.     

Current developments in peanut allergy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Peanut allergy is among the most serious, life-threatening food sensitivities, and recent studies indicate increasing prevalence, particularly among children. Our objective is to highlight recent advances in the immunology and treatment of peanut allergy. RECENT FINDINGS: Peanut sensitization may be both a Th1- and Th2-driven process, and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) may play a role in regulating the response intensity. Preliminary work shows that the food matrix is important in the immune response to peanut and that purified peanut allergens may have little intrinsic stimulatory capacity. Studies characterizing peanut allergens have revealed Ara h 1 and Ara h 2 as the most potent allergens, but Ara h 3 may be more allergenic than previously thought. There appears to be a relationship between the diversity of IgE-binding patterns and the severity of clinical symptoms. Multiple novel approaches to treatment are being investigated, which include traditional Chinese medicine, various forms of modified immunotherapy and the use of adjuvants in modified immunotherapy. SUMMARY: By understanding the immunologic response to peanut and the roles of the major peanut allergens, it may be possible to predict those at risk for severe reactions, prevent peanut sensitization and effectively treat those already sensitized.     

Monitoring peanut allergen in food products by measuring Ara h 1

BACKGROUND: Peanut allergy is an important health problem in the United States, affecting approximately 0.6% of children. Inadvertent exposure to peanut is a risk factor for life-threatening food-induced anaphylaxis. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this investigation was to develop an immunoassay for a major peanut allergen, Ara h 1, to detect peanut allergen in foods so that the risk of inadvertent exposure can be reduced. METHODS: A specific 2-site monoclonal antibody-based ELISA was developed to measure Ara h 1 in foods. The sensitivity of the assay was 30 ng/mL. Ara h 1 was measured in foods (n = 83) with or without peanut and in experiments to optimize allergen yield and to determine peanut contamination in spiked foods. RESULTS: Ara h 1 levels in food products ranged from less than 0.1 microg/g to 500 microg/g. Ara h 1 measured in ng/mL was transformed to microg/g for food products. Peanut butter contained the highest amounts of Ara h 1. Peanut extracts contained from 0.5 to 15 mg Ara h 1/g of peanut depending on the extraction conditions. Optimal extraction of Ara h 1 was obtained by using phosphate buffer with 1 mol/L NaCl and Tween at 60 degrees C. Ara h 1 was not always detected in presence of chocolate under the extraction conditions tested. Spiking experiments showed that the assay could detect approximately 0.1% Ara h 1 contamination of food with ground peanut. There was an excellent correlation between Ara h 1 levels and peanut content measured by using a commercial polyclonal antibody-based ELISA (r = 93, n = 31, P <.001). CONCLUSION: A new sensitive and specific monoclonal antibody-based ELISA was used to monitor Ara h 1 content in food products. This assay should be useful for monitoring peanut contamination in the food manufacturing and processing industry and in developing thresholds for sensitization or allergic reaction in persons with peanut allergy.     

Peanut- and cow's milk-specific IgE, Th2 cells and local anaphylactic reaction are induced in Balb/c mice orally sensitized with cholera toxin

BACKGROUND: The development of animal models developing specific immunoglobulin (Ig)E presenting the same specificity as human IgE and similar clinical symptoms as those observed in allergic patients are of great interest for the understanding of mechanisms involved in the induction and regulation of food allergy. METHODS: Balb/c female mice were sensitized with whole peanut protein extract (WPPE) by means of intraperitoneal (i.p.) injections with alum or gavages with cholera toxin (CT). The WPPE specific IgE, IgG1 and IgG2a were monitored. Th2 cells activation was analysed assaying interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-5 vs IFNgamma on reactivated splenocytes. Local anaphylactic reaction was evaluated by assaying histamine in faecal samples. The oral sensitization protocol was further extended to cow's milk proteins (CMP). RESULTS: Balb/c mice developed high peanut-specific IgE and IgG1 responses either after i.p. or oral sensitizations. In both cases, antibodies were specific to polymer of glycinin fragments, containing polypeptides from Ara h3/4, and to a lesser extent to Ara h1 and Ara h2. Interleukin-4 and IL-5 production were evidenced. Balb/c mice could also be sensitized to CMP, as demonstrated by CMP-specific IL-4 and IL-5 secretions and induction of IgE specific for whole caseins, beta-lactoglobulin, serum bovine albumin and lactoferrin. Of interest was the occurrence of a local anaphylactic reaction in the peanut and CM models. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast with previous authors, Balb/c mice were sensitized and evidenced an allergic reaction after oral administrations of peanut or CMP plus CT, providing an interesting model for further studies on immunopathogenic mechanisms.     

The diagnostic accuracy of specific IgE to Ara h 6 in adults is as good as Ara h 2

Specific IgE (sIgE) to Ara h 2 is useful in diagnosing peanut allergy. Our aim was to assess the diagnostic value of sIgE to Ara h 6, another 2S albumin, in an adult population suspected of peanut allergy. Subjects with suspected peanut allergy between 2002 and 2013 were included if a diagnostic double‐blind, placebo‐controlled food challenge with peanut was performed. sIgE to Ara h 2 and Ara h 6 was measured by ImmunoCAP ISAC 112. Of 107 challenged subjects, 65 had a positive challenge (61%). The discriminative ability of sIgE to Ara h 2 and Ara h 6 was comparable: AUC 0.81 vs 0.82. Positive predictive value for both tests was 95% using a cutoff value ≥1 ISU/l with poor corresponding sensitivity values (58% for Ara h 2, 62% for Ara h 6), but good specificity values (95% for both tests). In conclusion, the diagnostic value of sIgE to Ara h 6 on population level was as good as sIgE to Ara h 2. On individual level, however, 5% of the subjects showed contradicting results between both tests using a cutoff of 0.3 ISU/l, leading to a risk of misdiagnosis if only one of both tests is used.     

Analysis of the effector activity of Ara h 2 and Ara h 6 by selective depletion from a crude peanut extract

It is important to know the contribution of specific allergens to a complex allergenic extract and to have a dependable method to assess the effector activity of an extract specifically depleted of that allergen. We have previously shown that removal of the major peanut allergen, Ara h 2, from a crude peanut extract (CPE) minimally altered the effector activity of the extract. Here we describe in detail the methodology used to generate specific rabbit anti-peptide antibodies to remove a related peanut allergen, Ara h 6, from CPE and describe an improvement in the RBL SX-38 cell assay used to assess the effector activity of treated extracts. Our results show that although Ara h 2 and Ara h 6 can be selectively removed from a CPE, removal of each alone from a CPE had no significant effect on the effector activity. However, removal of Ara h 2 and Ara h 6 together significantly reduced the effector activity of CPE.     

IgE cross-reactivity between the major peanut allergen Ara h 2 and tree nut allergens

Allergy to peanut and tree nuts is characterised by a high frequency of life-threatening anaphylactic reactions and typically lifelong persistence. Although peanut is the most common cause of nut allergy, peanut allergic patients are frequently also sensitive to tree nuts. It is not known if this is due to cross-reactivity between peanut and tree nut allergens. In this study, the major peanut allergen Ara h 2 was cloned from peanut cDNA, expressed in E. coli cells as a His-tag fusion protein and purified using a Ni-NTA column. Immunoblotting, ELISA and basophil activation indicated by CD63 expression all confirmed the IgE reactivity and biological activity of rAra h 2. To determine whether or not this allergen plays a role in IgE cross-reactivity between peanut and tree nuts, inhibition ELISA was performed. Pre-incubation of serum from peanut allergic patients with increasing concentrations of almond or Brazil nut extract inhibited IgE binding to rAra h 2. Purified rAra h 2-specific serum IgE antibodies also bound to proteins present in almond and Brazil nut extracts by immunoblotting. This indicates that the major peanut allergen, Ara h 2, shares common IgE-binding epitopes with almond and Brazil nut allergens, which may contribute to the high incidence of tree nut sensitisation in peanut allergic individuals.     

Serological characteristics of peanut allergy in children

BACKGROUND: Food challenge is considered an excellent clinical tool for the diagnosis of specific food allergy. However in the case of peanut allergy it may be difficult to perform because of the severity of the reactions. The quantitation of a specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) response to different peanut allergens could also contribute to the improvement of the diagnosis. We characterized the IgE response to a whole peanut protein extract and to Ara h 1 and Ara h 2 in different groups of patients classified according to the severity of their allergic reactions. METHODS: Specific serum IgE were analyzed in 96 children by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay tests using a whole protein extract or purified peanut proteins and anti-human IgE monoclonal antibodies labeled with acetylcholinesterase. RESULTS: A parallel was observed between levels of peanut-specific IgE and the classification in five groups and subgroups of patients upon increasing severity of symptoms, especially within the group of highest severity. Moreover, the highest frequency of positive response and the highest levels of specific IgE were observed with whole peanut protein extract. CONCLUSION: In a retrospective evaluation of peanut allergy in children, we have shown that quantitation of peanut-specific IgE could be used to avoid a food challenge particularly in the case of severe reactions. When compared to Ara h 1 and Ara h 2, whole peanut protein extract appeared to be the most appropriate allergen to perform the test.     

Epicutaneous exposure to peanut protein prevents oral tolerance and enhances allergic sensitization

BACKGROUND: Food allergies are an important cause of life-threatening hypersensitivity reactions. Oral tolerance can be considered the default immune response to dietary antigens, with immune deviation resulting in allergic sensitization. However, primary sensitization to food allergens may not solely be through the gastrointestinal mucosa, as strong T-helper type 2 (Th2)-biased immunity can result from exposure to protein allergens on barrier-disrupted skin. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine whether exposure to allergens through the skin may interfere with the normal development of oral tolerance and promote allergic sensitization to food proteins. METHODS: Female BALB/c mice were exposed epicutaneously to peanut protein and induction of systemic oral tolerance through high dose feeds of peanut protein was subsequently assessed. Other mice were rendered tolerant prior to epicutaneous peanut exposure. Sensitivity to peanut was determined by assessing delayed-type hypersensitivity, proliferative, cytokine and antibody responses. RESULTS: Epicutaneous exposure to peanut protein induced potent Th2-type immunity with high levels of IL-4 and serum IgE. Primary skin exposure prevented the subsequent induction of oral tolerance to peanut in an antigen-specific manner. Upon oral challenge, mice became further sensitized and developed strong peanut-specific IL-4 and IgE responses. Furthermore, animals with existing tolerance to peanut were partly sensitized following epicutaneous exposure. CONCLUSION: Epicutaneous exposure to peanut protein can prevent induction of oral tolerance, and may even modify existing tolerance to peanut. Epidermal exposure to protein allergens selectively drives Th2-type responses, and as such may promote sensitization to food proteins upon gastrointestinal exposure.     

Basophil response to peanut allergens in Mediterranean peanut‐allergic patients

Ara h 1, Ara h 2, and Ara h 3 are important sensitizers in peanut allergy. Ara h 9 has also been shown to be relevant in the Mediterranean area. We evaluated the basophil response to peanut allergens and Pru p 3 in Mediterranean patients: Group 1, peanut and peach allergy; Group 2, peanut allergy and tolerance to peach; Group 3, peach allergy and tolerance to peanut; Group 4, nonallergic subjects that tolerate both peanut and peach. Compared to controls (Group 4), there was an increased basophil activation with Ara h 2 (P = 0.031) and Pru p 3 (P = 0.009) in Group 1 and with Ara h 1 (P = 0.016), Ara h 2 (P = 0.001), and Ara h 9 (P = 0.016) in Group 2. Importantly, only Ara h 2 showed an increased activation (P = 0.009) in Group 2 compared to Group 3. Ara h 2 is the best discriminating allergen for peanut allergy diagnosis in a Mediterranean population showing two patterns: patients also allergic to peach, responding to Ara h 2 and Pru p 3, and patients allergic only to peanut, responding to Ara h 1, Ara h 2, and Ara h 9.