Influence of an antidiabetic treatment with sulfonylurea drugs on long-term survival after acute myocardial infarction in patients with type 2 diabetes. The LAngendreer Myocardial infarction and Blood glucose in Diabetic patients Assessment (LAMBDA).

INTRODUCTION: Patients with type 2 diabetes show a significantly higher mortality after acute myocardial infarction than non-diabetic patients. The influence of sulfonylureas on the survival after acute myocardial infarction is still under debate. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Survival of 562 patients, consecutively admitted to an intensive care unit with the diagnosis acute myocardial infarction, was prospectively assessed for > 3 years. At the time of hospital admission, patients were grouped as (a) non-diabetic patients; (b) patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes; (c) patients with known type 2 diabetes not treated with sulfonylureas and (d) patients with known type 2 diabetes treated with sulfonylureas. Survival-analysis was performed according to Kaplan-Meier. RESULTS: 324 patients were non-diabetics, in 86 cases type 2 diabetes was newly diagnosed at the time of hospital admission, 77 patients with known diabetes had taken sulfonylureas (glibenclamide in all cases) prior to the acute myocardial infarction, 75 patients were on any other antidiabetic treatment. Long-term-survival was significantly shorter in patients with type 2 diabetes compared to the non-diabetic patients (p < 0.0001). However, no significant differences were observed between the patients with type 2 diabetes treated with sulfonylurea-drugs and those receiving any other antidiabetic treatment (p = 0.53) CONCLUSIONS: An antidiabetic treatment with sulfonylurea-drugs prior to acute myocardial infarction does not have negative effects on the long-term survival. Larger prospective studies will be necessary to finally clarify this question.     

Myocardial infarction in diabetic vs non-diabetic subjects. Survival and infarct size following therapy with sulfonylureas (glibenclamide)

AIMS: Sulfonylureas may interfere with 'ischaemic preconditioning' and worsen the prognosis in diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction. METHODS AND RESULTS: Three hundred and fifty-seven non-diabetic patients admitted with acute myocardial infarction to one hospital over 6.5 years (72 deaths, in-hospital mortality 20.2%) were compared to 245 Type 2 diabetic patients categorized as having taken sulfonylureas (glibenclamide 7+/-3 mg x day(-1); n = 76, 25 deaths = 32.9%;P = 0.025), not having taken sulfonylureas (n = 89, 29 deaths = 33.0%;P = 0.012), and newly diagnosed as having diabetes (n = 80, 20 deaths = 25.0%). Survival was significantly different (log-rank test: P = 0.03). Increments in creatine kinase and creatine kinase(MB)activity were higher in non-diabetic patients (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In-hospital mortality in Type 2 diabetic patients is higher than in non-diabetic patients suffering acute myocardial infarction regardless of whether or not they had been treated with sulfonylureas. Glibenclamide does not enlarge myocardial necroses.     

Acute coronary syndrome in a diabetic population--risk factors and clinical and angiographic characteristics.

INTRODUCTION: Diabetes is not only a risk factor for coronary artery disease but also influences its presentation and evolution. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this work is to define the risk factors, clinical and angiographic characteristics, and evolution of acute coronary syndrome in a population of diabetic patients. METHODOLOGY: We studied 521 patients suffering from acute coronary syndrome, consecutively hospitalized in the Cardiology Intensive Care Unit who underwent cardiac catheterization during their hospitalization, in terms of risk factors for coronary disease, pathology (unstable angina versus acute myocardial infarction), coronary morphology, left ventricular function, need for intervention during hospitalization, evolution and complications during one-year follow-up. The characteristics of the diabetic patients with acute coronary syndrome were compared to those of non-diabetic patients. RESULTS: Of the 521 patients suffering from acute coronary syndrome (391 male), 159 (30.5%) were diabetic. The diabetic patients suffering from acute coronary syndrome generally presented fewer risk factors for coronary artery disease, with a lower prevalence of smoking (p < 0.001), greater prevalence of family history of coronary artery disease (p < 0.01), more unstable angina and less acute myocardial infarction (both p < 0.001), than the nondiabetic patients. After the acute coronary syndrome the diabetic patients more frequently presented disease of the left anterior descending artery, left ventricular function was worse and there was a greater need for coronary artery bypass graft surgery and less percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty than in the non-diabetic patients (p < 0.05 for all). In terms of evolution, they presented greater complications and more mortality over a year (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Diabetes constitutes a powerful risk factor for coronary artery disease and its complications, and should therefore be taken into consideration in clinical approaches to this pathology.     

Hospital outcome of acute myocardial infarction in patients with and without diabetes mellitus.

AIMS: To assess hospital mortality and morbidity in diabetic and non-diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction and to compare the results between the two groups. METHODS: All patients admitted in 1999 to the intensive care unit of the Schwabing City Hospital with diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction were assessed for hospital mortality and co-morbidity. RESULTS: Three hundred and thirty patients with acute myocardial infarction were admitted. Of those, 126 (38%) were diabetic and 204 (62%) were non-diabetic patients. Mortality within 24 h after admission was 13.5% in diabetic patients and 5.4% in non-diabetic patients (P<0.01). Mortality during entire hospitalization was higher in diabetic than in non-diabetic patients (29.4% vs. 16.2%; P=0.004). Diabetic patients were resuscitated more frequently than non-diabetic patients (24% vs. 11%, P<0.01). In diabetic patients, heart rate at admission was increased (91 +/- 27 vs. 82 +/- 23/min; P<0.01) and presence of angina pectoris was reported less frequently (59% (n=72) vs. 82% (n=167); P<0.001). Preceding myocardial infarction, microalbuminuria, peripheral artery disease and arterial hypertension were more frequent in diabetic than in non-diabetic patients. Diabetic patients demonstrated higher C-reactive protein (CRP) levels than non-diabetic patients (91.4 +/- 78.2 mg/l vs. 45.2 +/- 62.4 mg/l; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction, early hospital mortality is increased and signs of cardiac autonomic dysfunction and microangiopathy are detected more frequently than in non-diabetic patients. The need for advanced treatment strategies early in the course of diabetic patients with myocardial infarction is emphasized.     

Role of previous treatment with sulfonylureas in diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction: results from a nationwide French registry

BACKGROUND: The cardiovascular effects of sulfonylureas (SU) in diabetic patients are controversial and it has been suggested that diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction while on SU were at increased risk. OBJECTIVES: To assess the in-hospital outcome of patients with acute myocardial infarction according to the use of SU at the time of the acute episode. METHODS: Of 443 intensive care units in France, 369 (83%) prospectively collected all cases of infarction admitted within 48 h of symptom onset in November 2000. RESULTS: Among the 2320 patients included in the registry, 487 (21%) had diabetes, of whom 215 (44%) were on SU. Patients on SU were older and had a more frequent history of hyperlipidemia than those not receiving SU. Type and location of infarction were similar in the two groups, and there was no difference in Killip class on admission. In-hospital mortality was lower in patients on SU (10.2%) than in those without SU (16.9%) (p = 0.035). There was a trend toward less frequent ventricular fibrillation (2.3% vs 5.9%, p = 0.052). In two models of multivariate analyses, SU therapy was associated with decreased in-hospital mortality (model 1: relative risk: 0.44, p = 0.012; model 2: relative risk: 0.37, p = 0.020). CONCLUSIONS: In this nationwide registry reflecting real-world practice, the use of sulfonylureas in diabetic patients was not associated with increased in-hospital mortality.     

Antecedent angina pectoris predicts worse outcome after myocardial infarction in patients receiving thrombolytic therapy: experience gleaned from the International Tissue Plasminogen Activator/Streptokinase Mortality Trial.

The significance of antecedent angina in predicting clinical outcome was assessed in 8,329 patients with acute myocardial infarction who received thrombolytic therapy with either recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator or streptokinase. There were 2,370 patients with antecedent angina for greater than 1 month, 1,512 patients with antecedent angina for less than or equal to 1 month and 4,447 patients with no antecedent angina. The longer the duration of angina, the worse the baseline characteristics in the three groups: the mean patient age was 65 versus 62 versus 61 years, respectively (p less than 0.0001); the rate of previous myocardial infarction was 37% versus 18% versus 10% (p less than 0.0001); and the rate of hypertension was 40% versus 31% versus 27% (p less than 0.0001). Antecedent angina was associated with a longer hospital stay (11.3 and 11.7 days vs. 10.8 days, p less than 0.0001), a higher incidence of bypass surgery (2.2% vs. 1.2% vs. 0.7%, p = 0.0001), a worse Killip class at discharge (10.6% of patients in class greater than 1 vs. 8.7% vs. 6.4%, p = 0.0001), and a higher hospital and 6-month mortality (12.1% and 18% vs. 8.9% and 11.6% vs. 6.6% and 9.2%, respectively, p less than 0.0001). A multivariate analysis taking into account all baseline characteristics confirmed the independent association of antecedent angina with mortality, with a relative risk of 1.4 to 1.47 (p less than 0.001). Antecedent angina predicts a worse clinical outcome and a more intense use of medical resources in patients with acute myocardial infarction receiving thrombolytic therapy.     

Plasminogen activator inhibitor: a risk factor for myocardial infarction in diabetic patients.

OBJECTIVE--To determine whether diabetic patients admitted with acute myocardial infarction have impaired fibrinolytic activity due to raised plasminogen activator inhibitor compared with non-diabetic patients. SETTING--A district general hospital. PATIENTS--90 non-diabetic and 38 diabetic patients admitted with acute myocardial infarction. RESULTS--Both plasminogen activator inhibitor activity and antigen were significantly higher in diabetic than in non-diabetic patients (24.7 (6.8) v 18.5 (6.8) AU/ml; p = 0.0001 and 64.2 (range 13.1 to 328.8) v 38.5 (range 10.9 to 173.7 ng/ml; z = 3.3; p = 0.0008) with a positive correlation between activity and antigen (rs = 0.51; p = 0.0001). In both groups, activity and antigen concentrations were significantly higher than in diabetic and non-diabetic subjects without coronary artery disease (p = 0.002 to 0.0001 for each comparison). Plasminogen activator inhibitor activity correlated significantly with admission plasma glucose (r = 0.32; p = 0.0001), glycated haemoglobin (r = 0.32; p = 0.0001), admission plasma insulin (rs = 0.48; p = 0.001), and Killip grade of heart failure both on admission (rs = 0.27; p = 0.001) and on discharge (rs = 0.22; p = 0.006), but not with cumulative creatine kinase MB isoenzyme release (rs = -0.08). There were similar but weaker correlations between tissue plasminogen activator antigen and admission plasma glucose, glycated haemoglobin, and insulin. In 18 patients (12 non-diabetic and six diabetic) plasminogen activator inhibitor activity was measured between six and 12 months (8.3 (1.6)) after the acute infarct and remained similar to activity on admission (24.8 (1.9) AU/ml (NS) for diabetic and 17.9 (6.9) AU/ml (NS) for non-diabetic patients) and was still significantly higher in diabetic than in non-diabetic patients (p = 0.007). CONCLUSION--These results show that diabetic patients have higher plasminogen activator inhibitor activity than non-diabetic patients both on admission with acute myocardial infarction and at follow up six to 12 months later. Raised plasminogen activator inhibitor activity may predispose diabetic patients to myocardial infarction and may also impair pharmacological and spontaneous reperfusion after acute myocardial infarction thus contributing to the poor outcome in these subjects.     

Underuse of evidence-based treatment modalities in diabetic patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome. A prospective nation wide study on acute coronary syndrome (FINACS)

This study was designed to evaluate how new treatment guidelines of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) without ST elevation have been implemented in clinical practice especially in diabetic patients. A prospective follow-up was performed on 501 consecutive patients with suspected ACS without ST elevation admitted to nine hospitals in Finland between 15 January and 11 March 2001. The study group included 143 (29%) diabetic patients. Their risk profile was more severe than in non-diabetic patients; ST-depression on admission electrocardiography 57 versus 38%; P<0.0001, elevated troponin levels 66 versus 56%; P<0.05. Six months composite incidence of death, new myocardial infarction (MI), refractory angina or readmission for unstable angina was 39% in diabetic patients and 20% in non-diabetic patients (P<0.0001). In spite of this more severe risk profile, glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists and statins were used with similar frequency in non-diabetic and diabetic patients (15 vs. 19 and 48 vs. 54%, respectively; P=NS for both). In diabetic patients mean delay for in hospital coronary angiography was longer (6.4 vs. 4.2 days, P<0.05) and it was performed less often (32 vs. 45% P<0.05). Our results show that diabetic patients with ACS have higher risk profile and worse outcome than non-diabetic patients. Despite their indisputable benefits in diabetic patients, statins, GP IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists and invasive strategy were underused or often neglected. Further education is needed to change attitudes and to better implement new guidelines into clinical practice.     

Prognostic significance of microalbuminuria in non-diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to examine whether the presence of microalbuminuria (20-200 microg/min) can predict in-hospital morbidity and mortality in non-diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction. METHODS: Two hundred twenty-three (172 men and 51 women) non-diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction were studied prospectively. The main outcome measures of the study were based on a comparison of in-hospital mortality and major non-fatal in-hospital events (pulmonary edema, post-infarction angina, infarct extension, mechanical complications, conduction disturbances and ventricular arrhythmias) between microalbuminuric and normoalbuminuric patients. RESULTS: A significant proportion of patients (33.6%) had microalbuminuria. Seventy-six patients (34%) developed an in-hospital event (fatal or non-fatal). Six patients (2.7%) with acute myocardial infarction died in the hospital. Patients with microalbuminuria had a higher mortality rate in comparison with normoalbuminuric patients (6.6% vs. 0.68%, p = 0.01). For non-fatal events, the incidence of pulmonary edema and ventricular arrhythmias was significantly higher in patients with microalbuminuria (14.6% vs. 3.4%, p < 0.001 and 12% vs. 3.4%, p = 0.01, respectively). The combined end-point of the total number of fatal and non-fatal events was significantly higher in patients with microalbuminuria (57.3% vs. 22.3%, p < 0.001). In multiple logistic regression analysis, microalbuminuria (p < 0.001) and ejection fraction (p = 0.01) were independently related to the occurrence of major in-hospital events. CONCLUSIONS: Microalbuminuria is a significant predictor of in-hospital morbidity and mortality in non-diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction.     

Clinical Characteristics,Left and Right Ventricular Ejection Fraction,and Long-term Prognosis in Patients with Non-insulin-dependent Diabetes Surviving an Acute Myocardial Infarction

Patients with diabetes mellitus have a high morbidity and mortality from acute myocardial infarction, the reason for which is not fully understood. The relationship between congestive heart failure symptoms, left ventricular ejection fraction, and long-term mortality was examined in 578 hospital survivors of acute myocardial infarction, 47 of whom had Type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus. None of the patients were treated with insulin. The prevalence of congestive heart failure during hospitalization was similar in patients with and without diabetes, although mean diuretic dose was higher in the former patients. Left and right ventricular ejection fraction was measured with radionuclide ventriculography in the second week after acute myocardial infarction. At discharge from the coronary care unit, patients with and without diabetes had similar left ventricular ejection fraction (with diabetes: median 46% vs without diabetes: median 43%; p = 0.89). Median right ventricular ejection fraction (62 %) was within normal limits in both groups and did not differ statistically. Survival data were obtained for all patients. The 5-year mortality was increased in patients with diabetes compared with non-diabetic patients independent of left ventricular ejection fraction. Univariate analysis showed that the cumulative 5-year mortality rate was 53 % in the group with diabetes compared with 43% in the non-diabetic group (p = 0.007). Using multivariate regression analysis presence of diabetes was found to have a significant association with long-term mortality after myocardial infarction, that was independent of age, history of hypertension, congestive heart failure symptoms during hospitalization or of either left or right ventricular ejection fractions at discharge. We conclude that the excess mortality in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus is not explained by available risk markers after myocardial infarction. Even though left ventricular ejection fraction and serum creatinine did not differ significantly, the apparent higher dose of Frusemide in patients with than without non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus might indicate that heart failure, if present, is more severe in patients with than in those without diabetes. The importance of diastolic dysfunction in this context needs to be determined.     

Diabetes worsens the outcome of acute ischemic stroke

OBJECTIVE: To characterize acute stroke events in diabetic patients in a population-based stroke register and to determine the influence of diabetes on the outcome of acute stroke. METHODS: Four thousand three hundred and ninety patients were recorded in the FINMONICA and FINSTROKE registers after their first ischemic stroke from 1990 to 1998. We followed mortality and stroke outcome for up to 4 weeks after the onset of acute stroke. RESULTS: Of the 4390 patients who had had an ischemic stroke, 43.6% were male and 25.1% (1103) had diabetes. Their mean age was 72.4 (S.D. 12.0) years and this was similar in patients with and without diabetes (72.9 years versus 72.3 years, p=0.18). Subjects with diabetes were more likely to be hypertensive (55% versus 38%, p<0.001) and have a history of myocardial infarction (20% versus 16%, p<0.001) than the non-diabetic stroke patients. Mortality at 4 weeks from the onset was higher in diabetic than in non-diabetic patients (20.0% versus 16.9% p=0.020). At day 28 after the stroke attack, diabetic patients were more likely to be disabled when compared with non-diabetic subjects (43.3% versus 33.5%, p<0.001). Using logistic regression analysis, adjusted for age-group, sex, previous medical history (MI, AF or TIA), diabetes was found to be a significant predictor of disability after stroke (OR=1.51, 95% CI 1.27-1.81). CONCLUSIONS: Diabetes, which affected one-fourth of the ischemic stroke patients on our register, was associated with a higher risk of death and disability after the onset of stroke. Preventing diabetes in the elderly population improves the short-term prognosis of acute ischemic stroke.     

Mortality, mode of death and risk indicators for death during 5 years after coronary artery bypass grafting among patients with and without a history of diabetes mellitus

OBJECTIVE: To describe mortality, mode of death, risk indicators for death and symptoms of angina pectoris among survivors during 5 years after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) among patients with and without a history of diabetes mellitus. METHODS: All patients in western Sweden who underwent CABG without concomitant valve surgery and who had no previous CABG between June 1988 and June 1991 were entered prospectively in this study. After 5 years, information on deaths that had occurred was obtained for the analysis. RESULTS: In all, 1998 patients were included in the analysis; 242 (12%) had a history of diabetes. Among the non-diabetic patients, 5-year mortality was 12.5%; the corresponding relative risk for diabetic patients was 2.1 (95% confidence interval 1.6 to 2.9). A history of diabetes was an independent risk indicator of death; there was no significant interaction between any other risk indicator and diabetes. Independent risk indicators for death among diabetic patients were: current smoking, renal dysfunction and left ventricular ejection fraction < 0.40. Compared with non-diabetic patients, those with diabetes more frequently died in hospital, died a cardiac death, or had death associated with the development of acute myocardial infarction and with symptoms of congestive heart failure. Among survivors, diabetic patients tended to have more angina pectoris 5 years after CABG than did those without diabetes. CONCLUSION: During a period of 5 years after CABG, diabetic patients had a mortality twice that of non-diabetic patients. The increased risk included death in hospital, cardiac death and death associated with development of acute myocardial infarction and with symptoms of congestive heart failure.     

Antihyperglycemic treatment in diabetics with coronary disease: increased metformin-associated mortality over a 5-year follow-up.

Mortality rates are considerably higher in chronic ischemic heart disease (IHD) patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) than in those who are nondiabetics. The relationship between different types of antihyperglycemic pharmacological therapy and mortality rate in this NIDDM population is uncertain. We aimed to examine the survival in NIDDM patients with IHD using various types of oral antidiabetic treatments over a 5-year follow-up period. The study sample comprised 11,440 patients with a previous myocardial infarction and/or stable anginal syndrome, aged 45-74 years, who were screened, but not included in the Bezafibrate Infarction Prevention study. Among them, 9,045 were nondiabetics and 2,395 diabetics. The diabetic patients were divided into four groups on the basis of their therapeutic regimen at screening: diet alone (n = 990), sulfonylureas (n = 1,041), metformin (n = 78) and a combination of a sulfonylurea and metformin (n = 266). All NIDDM groups were similar with regard to age, gender, hypertension, smoking, heart failure, angina and prior myocardial infarction. Crude mortality rate was lower in the nondiabetic group (11.21 vs. 21.8%; p < 0.001). In the diabetic group, mortality was 18.5% for patients on diet alone, 22.5% for those on sulfonylureas, 25.6% for patients on metformin, and 31.6% for the combined sulfonylurea/metformin group (p < 0.01). When analyzing age-adjusted mortality rate and actuarial survival curves, the lowest mortality was found in patients on diet alone and the highest in patients on metformin (alone or in combination with sulfonylureas). After adjustment for variables connected with long-term prognosis, the use of metformin was associated with increased relative risk (RR) for all-cause mortality of 1.42 (95% CI 1.10-1.85), whereas the use of sulfonylureas alone was not [RR 1.11 (95% CI 0.90-1.36)]. NIDDM patients with IHD using metformin, alone or in combination with sulfonylureas, exhibited a significantly increased mortality. Until the results of problem-oriented prospective studies on oral control of NIDDM will be available, alternative therapeutic approaches should be investigated in these patients.     

Effect of coronary occlusion site on angiographic and clinical outcome in acute myocardial infarction patients treated with early coronary intervention

In acute myocardial infarction that is treated with thrombolysis, proximal coronary artery occlusion is associated with worse prognosis, irrespective of the infarcted artery. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is currently the treatment of choice for ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction. Therefore, we evaluated the prognostic significance of proximal versus distal coronary artery occlusion in patients with acute myocardial infarction that was treated with primary PCI. Between 1994 and 2001, patients with a first acute myocardial infarction that was treated with primary PCI were analyzed. A lesion was considered proximal if it was located proximal to the first diagonal branch in the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD), the first marginal obtuse branch in the left circumflex coronary artery, and the first right acute marginal branch in the right coronary artery. Lesions distal of these side branches were considered distal. In total, 1,468 patients were analyzed. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) for proximal LAD lesions was lower than that for distal ones (37 +/- 11% vs 42 +/- 11%, p <0.0001). Adjusted relative risk of 3-year mortality for proximal versus distal LAD was 4.04 (95% confidence interval 1.95 to 8.38). In patients with infarcts related to the right or left circumflex coronary artery, no significant association between lesion location and LVEF or mortality was seen. No difference was seen in adjusted 3-year mortality between distal LAD and non-LAD-related infarcts (p = 0.145). In conclusion, our analysis shows that, even in patients with acute myocardial infarction that is treated with primary PCI, infarcts related to the proximal LAD have the worst 3-year survival and lowest residual LVEF compared with distal LAD or non-LAD-related infarcts.     

Prognosis of Acute Myocardial Infarction in Diabetic and Non-diabetic Patients

We evaluated the prognosis of 858 patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI), of whom 97 (11%) had a history of diabetes mellitus. Among patients with diabetes the 1-year mortality rate was 41% versus 26% for non-diabetic patients (p < 0.01), and the 1-year reinfarction rates were 23% and 14%, respectively (p = 0.05). Diabetic patients with a history of hypertension had a similar mortality rate as comapred with diabetic patients without hypertension. In a multivariate analysis including age and history of cardiovascular disease, diabetes did not significantly contribute to death or reinfarction. Among diabetic patients the only independent risk factor for death was age. The place and mode of death appeared similar in the two groups. Patients with and without a history of diabetes had a similar infarct size. We conclude that diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction have a very poor prognosis. Within 1 year nearly half of them are dead and one-quarter develop reinfarction. The mode of death appeared to be similar in diabetic patients as compared with non-diabetic patients.     

Influence of vessel size on early and late outcomes after primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction

Small vessel size is associated with worse outcomes after elective angioplasty, but the effect of vessel size on outcomes after primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction has not been studied. We evaluated outcomes in 1,490 consecutive patients treated with primary angioplasty comparing patients with small (< 3.0 mm) versus large ( 3.0 mm) vessels. Outcomes were worse in patients with small vessels with lower procedural success rates (92% versus 96%; p = 0. 002), higher rates of reinfarction (5.5% vs. 3.4%; p = 0.07), more late reocclusion (12.5% vs. 4.1%; p = 0.002), less improvement in ejection fraction (1.8% vs. 4.2%; p = 0.04), lower follow-up ejection fraction (53.7% vs. 56.5%; p = 0.03), and higher 30-day and late mortality (12.5% vs. 6.4%; p = 0.0002). The higher mortality can be explained by a higher baseline risk profile combined with worse procedural results and higher rates of reocclusion and reinfarction. These data stress the importance of developing new strategies to improve procedural and late outcomes after primary angioplasty in patients with small vessels.     

The in-hospital development of cardiogenic shock after myocardial infarction: incidence, predictors of occurrence, outcome and prognostic factors. The MILIS Study Group

The incidence, outcome and predictors of the in-hospital development of cardiogenic shock and its prognostic significance were analyzed in 845 patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction. Cardiogenic shock developed after hospitalization in 60 patients (7.1%). In half of these patients, cardiogenic shock developed at least 24 h after hospital admission. The in-hospital mortality rate was greater than 15 times higher for patients with cardiogenic shock than for patients without shock (65.0% versus 4.3%, respectively, p less than 0.001). Enzymatic evidence of infarct extension occurred in 23.3% of the patients with shock compared with 7.4% of those without shock (p less than 0.0001). Multivariate analysis indicated that independent predictors for the in-hospital development of cardiogenic shock were age greater than 65 years (p = 0.007), left ventricular ejection fraction on hospital admission less than 35% (p = 0.007), large infarct as estimated from serial enzyme determinations (that is, peak creatine kinase-MB isoenzyme greater than 160 IU/liter (p = 0.008), history of diabetes mellitus (p = 0.011) and previous myocardial infarction (p = 0.012). Patients with three, four or five of these risk factors had a 17.9%, 33.7% or 54.4% probability, respectively, of developing cardiogenic shock after hospital admission. Left ventricular function, as reflected by left ventricular ejection fraction (p = 0.04) and severity of left ventricular wall motion abnormality (p = 0.04), was the most important determinant of in-hospital mortality in the patients with cardiogenic shock.     

Acute Myocardial Infarction in Diabetic Patients in the Thrombolytic Era

To examine the benefits of thrombolytic therapy in diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction a retrospective study of all diabetic and non-diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction admitted to the coronary care unit of the General Hospital, Birmingham between January 1984 and December 1987 was made and findings compared to corresponding groups admitted between January 1990 and May 1992 when thrombolytic therapy was routine. In-hospital mortality and morbidity were assessed in 208 diabetic and 1029 non-diabetic patients with acute myocardial infraction admitted between 1984 and 1987 and in 115 diabetic and 501 non-diabetic patients admitted with myocardial infarction between January 1990 and May 1992. Following the introduction of thrombolytic therapy, there was a reduction in mortality among non-diabetic patients from 17 % to 8.5 %; p± 0.001 (observed reduction: 49 %; 95 % Cl: 30–70 %) and in the incidence of left ventricular failure (from 22 % to 8 %, p ± 0.01 (observed reduction: 52 %; 95 % Cl: 40–85.5 %). Diabetic patients showed a reduction in mortality from 30 % to 17 %; p = 0.02 (observed reduction: 42 %; 95 % Cl: 9.4–73.8 %) and in the incidence of left ventricular failure from 39 % to 21 %; p ± 0.01 (observed reduction: 45 %; 95 % Cl: 20.3–72.5 %). Thrombolytic therapy confers a major benefit on diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction, although this group remains at a prognostic disadvantage compared to non-diabetic patients.     

Myocardial infarct size and mortality in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus

Abstract. Objectives. To study the infarct size and mortality in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) and in non-diabetic subjects with their first acute myocardial infarction. Design. Seven year follow-up study of large representative cohorts of patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and non-diabetic subjects (study 1) and the FINMONICA acute myocardial infarction register study in 1988-89 (study 2). Setting. Populations of the districts of the Kuopio University Hospital and Turku University Central Hospital (study 1). Populations of Kuopio and North Karelia provinces and Turku/Loimaa area (study 2). Subjects. Study 1: 1059 patients with non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus and 1373 non-diabetic subjects aged 45–64 years at baseline; during the follow-up 166 patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (91 men and 75 women) and 30 non-diabetic subjects (25 men and five women) were hospitalized for their first acute myocardial infarction. Study 2: 1622 patients aged 25–64 years hospitalized for their first acute myocardial infarction; 144 patients (90 men and 54 women) had non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and 1153 (890 men and 263 women) were non-diabetic. Main outcome measures. The infarct size was assessed on the basis of maximum levels of serum cardiac enzymes (studies 1 and 2) and QRS-score (study 1). Results. No differences were found in maximum levels of serum cardiac enzymes between diabetic and non-diabetic patients. Similarly QRS-score gave no suggestion of a difference in infarct size between diabetic and non-diabetic patients. In both studies mortality before hospital admission was similar in diabetic and non-diabetic patients, but mortality within 28 days from hospital admission was twice as high in diabetic patients as in non-diabetic patients. Cardiac failure was the main cause of death significantly more often in diabetic patients than in non-diabetic patients (study 2). Conclusions. Poorer prognosis of acute myocardial infarction in diabetic patients appears not to be explained by a larger infarct size but probably by adverse effects of the diabetic state itself on myocardial function.     

The impact of heart failure on prognosis of diabetic and non-diabetic patients with myocardial infarction: a 15-year follow-up study

BACKGROUND: Information about the occurrence of heart failure in the acute phase of myocardial infarction (MI) in diabetic patients and its impact on prognosis are sparse. AIM: The purpose of the present study was to describe how MI patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) differed from MI patients without DM with respect to the occurrence of heart failure and with respect to the influence of heart failure on mortality during follow-up 30 days extending to 15 years. METHODS: The study is a retrospective long-term follow-up of prospectively recorded data concerning 1954 consecutive cases of MI admitted to one coronary care unit (CCU) between 1979 and 1983. DM was diagnosed in 10% (n=194), with 17% (n=33) on insulin therapy. Patients with DM comprised of a higher proportion of women (DM 36% vs. no DM 26%, P<0.001) compared with non-diabetic patients. Baseline risk factors were more prevalent in the patients with DM. The cumulative incidence of heart failure was higher among patients with than without DM (DM 54% vs. no DM 34%, P<0.001). The incidence of life-threatening arrhythmias were similar in both groups. Only 2% of patients with DM and heart failure survived 10 years of follow-up compared with 15% of the non-diabetic patients with heart failure (P<0.001). In multivariate analysis DM was not independently associated with 30 days mortality. During long-term follow-up DM was an important risk factor for mortality independent on the presence of heart failure. CONCLUSION: DM disposes to the development of heart failure. In acute myocardial infarction diabetic patients with heart failure have a worse prognosis than non-diabetic patients with heart failure.